Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Ever wondered why the world acts so confusingly (and hypocritically) toward Iran? ‼️ You noticed the double standards, freedom for Palestine, but not for Iran ? I made this video to explain the ugly truth behind Western reactions. I chose dark humor satire because it's sometimes the only way... to say the unsayable things out loud. This is my first attempt at something like this, be gentle, watch it till the end and tell me what you think. It will hit you with very harsh reality checks as well. Do you know these actual facts that fuel the hypocrisy? 1. In 1973, the Shah pushed for higher oil prices, global prices quadrupled, triggering recession & gas shortages across the West (long lines at pumps, economic shock). That put the West in a very uneasy situation toward the Shah. 2. Khomeini was in France (near Paris) before returning to Iran. Western media painted him as a peaceful "sage under the apple tree", he gave 132+ interviews, had huge access, and flew back to Tehran first-class on chartered Air France. 3. Khomeini and Western elite networks ran a huge smear campaign against the Shah, fabricating false stories, blood libels (like exaggerated massacre claims and distorted death numbers), and portraying him as a murderous ruler. 4. Another big lie pushed by Western left elites: Mosaddegh was "democratically elected" and overthrown only by CIA coup. Truth: He was never directly elected by people, he was appointed by the Shah, under constitutional system where Shah chose PM and parliament approved. He was dismissed in 1952 due to internal protests over his ties to Tudeh Party (communists), sabotage, and issues like assassination attempts (Jahanara assassination linked to Tudeh party). The constant narrative of "CIA puppet Shah" was amplified to hide these domestic reasons. 5. Right after the revolution, Khomeini turned super hostile toward the West: US Embassy hostage crisis. 6. The woman the West pushes as the next leader (2023 Nobel Peace Prize winner Narges Mohammadi) is an imprisoned activist, widely unpopular and rejected by majority of Iranians, die to her link to the regime. She is considered « controlled opposition » 7. Iranians protested massively several times in the past few decades, every time oppressed brutally with thousands murdered: 2009 (Green Movement, election fraud), Nov 2019 (nationwide internet blackout, and Woman Life Freedom, Mahsa uprising(2022) Every time, West does symbolic sanctions/ useless statements. 8. In crackdowns, security forces deliberately targeted protesters' eyes with pellets, blinding hundreds permanently (many lost one or both eyes) to intimidate and disable them. 9. Qatar supports the regime financially and diplomatically, while showing reluctance toward real regime change, preferring stability over chaos that could affect the region. 10. In January 2026, Western media, leftist networks, and elites heavily downplay the scale of protests inside and outside Iran, and dismiss the millions demanding Reza Pahlavi as leader, through hostile interviews and heavily biased reports aimed at damaging his image. 11. Sanctions have almost no real effect on the regime's power, they evade them through corruption, smuggling, and networks, but they devastate ordinary people's lives, causing extreme poverty. It also has no impact on regime’s oppression forces. 12. Iran has one of the oldest continuous monarchical traditions in the world, with over 2500 years of kingship from the Achaemenid Empire to Pahlavi era, a system deeply rooted in Persian culture, governance, and national identity long before Islam arrived. 13. Don't forget: 15 of the 19 hijackers on 9/11 were Saudi nationals, yet the West still treads carefully around Saudi Arabia and avoids upsetting them 🛑 Please share and help us Iranians in this unequal narrative war #IranMassacreshow more

Ida Turan 🇮🇷 ایده توران

40,323 subscribers

17,698 views • 7 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

IRAN WAS TURNED INTO A PROBLEM for the west by the west, a top CIA agent reveals in a stunning new documentary. Peter Sichel, former CIA station chief based in Hong Kong, gave an interview in a documentary, The Last Spy, before he died last year, aged 102. In the 1950s, Iranian Prime minister Mohammad Mossadegh wanted to nationalize the oil industry to share the profits with the people of Iran, Sichel said. So MI6 and the CIA overthrew him and installed the authoritarian Shah of Iran, M Reza Pahlavi, who promised to keep Iran’s oil money going to western oil corporations. But the whole thing was so brutally unfair that Iranians complained for decades, and eventually toppled Pahlavi in 1979. . REPEATING HISTORY Today, US President Donald Trump wants to get the US-serving Pahlavi faction reinstated, and Iran’s oil profits to be again controlled by the west. None of this was necessary. “If we had not got rid of Mossadegh, Iran today would be a good member of the family of nations,” Sichel says in the documentary. CIA historians acknowledge that the success of the US-UK operation against the Iranians in the 1950s prompted similar actions elsewhere—a long list of regime change operations. . DISLOYAL CIA AGENT When Sichel complained to his CIA bosses about the endless fearmongering about socialists and communists, he was painted as disloyal. The communist threat simply wasn't real. The MI6-CIA’s Iran coup model was used multiple times. In 1954, the US installed a military dictator in Guatemala, sparking a civil war that killed 245,000 people. Under the unwritten rules of western global dominance, the US, UK and Israel are never held accountable for crimes, however many innocent people die. And that’s why things have to change.

IRAN WAS TURNED INTO A PROBLEM for the west by the west, a top CIA agent reveals in a stunning new documentary. Peter Sichel, former CIA station chief based in Hong Kong, gave an interview in a documentary, The Last Spy, before he died last year, aged 102. In the 1950s, Iranian Prime minister Mohammad Mossadegh wanted to nationalize the oil industry to share the profits with the people of Iran, Sichel said. So MI6 and the CIA overthrew him and installed the authoritarian Shah of Iran, M Reza Pahlavi, who promised to keep Iran’s oil money going to western oil corporations. But the whole thing was so brutally unfair that Iranians complained for decades, and eventually toppled Pahlavi in 1979. . REPEATING HISTORY Today, US President Donald Trump wants to get the US-serving Pahlavi faction reinstated, and Iran’s oil profits to be again controlled by the west. None of this was necessary. “If we had not got rid of Mossadegh, Iran today would be a good member of the family of nations,” Sichel says in the documentary. CIA historians acknowledge that the success of the US-UK operation against the Iranians in the 1950s prompted similar actions elsewhere—a long list of regime change operations. . DISLOYAL CIA AGENT When Sichel complained to his CIA bosses about the endless fearmongering about socialists and communists, he was painted as disloyal. The communist threat simply wasn't real. The MI6-CIA’s Iran coup model was used multiple times. In 1954, the US installed a military dictator in Guatemala, sparking a civil war that killed 245,000 people. Under the unwritten rules of western global dominance, the US, UK and Israel are never held accountable for crimes, however many innocent people die. And that’s why things have to change.

Nury Vittachi

31,140 views • 4 months ago

Noor Pahlavi, daughter of Razi Pahlavi and granddaughter of the last Shah, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, recently delivered a powerful speech in the United States about Iran’s future. She spoke directly to the longing of millions of Iranians: freedom, dignity, and an end to 46 years of theocratic oppression. Iran has approximately 90 million inhabitants. According to reports from people inside the country, diaspora networks, and independent observers on the ground, around 80% of Iranians are rejoicing - many with tears of joy - over the regime’s fall and the ongoing liberation of their country through American and Israeli strikes. The remaining 20% are the hardline extremists, regime loyalists, and those who benefited from the mullahs’ rule. They are mourning and calling for revenge. The vast majority of Iranians - the silent, suffering majority - want Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi, who has lived in exile in the United States for decades, to return and lead a democratic transition. Not as a new dictator or eternal Shah, but as a bridge to free elections, a secular constitution, and genuine self-determination for the Iranian people. I believe them. I believe in the courage on the streets and the quiet hope that has survived decades of terror. Most countries in the Middle East - especially the UAE, Saudi Arabia, and others who have long viewed the Iranian regime as the greatest regional threat - have quietly or openly welcomed the regime’s collapse. They see it as the beginning of a more stable, less aggressive Middle East. This is not the end of history - the liberation is still unfolding. But it is a turning point that millions have prayed for. Iran deserves better. The Iranian people deserve freedom. May God protect the Iranian freedom fighters. May truth and justice prevail. May light break through - for Iran and for the entire region. ✝️❤️‍🔥🪽🙏

Noor Pahlavi, daughter of Razi Pahlavi and granddaughter of the last Shah, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, recently delivered a powerful speech in the United States about Iran’s future. She spoke directly to the longing of millions of Iranians: freedom, dignity, and an end to 46 years of theocratic oppression. Iran has approximately 90 million inhabitants. According to reports from people inside the country, diaspora networks, and independent observers on the ground, around 80% of Iranians are rejoicing - many with tears of joy - over the regime’s fall and the ongoing liberation of their country through American and Israeli strikes. The remaining 20% are the hardline extremists, regime loyalists, and those who benefited from the mullahs’ rule. They are mourning and calling for revenge. The vast majority of Iranians - the silent, suffering majority - want Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi, who has lived in exile in the United States for decades, to return and lead a democratic transition. Not as a new dictator or eternal Shah, but as a bridge to free elections, a secular constitution, and genuine self-determination for the Iranian people. I believe them. I believe in the courage on the streets and the quiet hope that has survived decades of terror. Most countries in the Middle East - especially the UAE, Saudi Arabia, and others who have long viewed the Iranian regime as the greatest regional threat - have quietly or openly welcomed the regime’s collapse. They see it as the beginning of a more stable, less aggressive Middle East. This is not the end of history - the liberation is still unfolding. But it is a turning point that millions have prayed for. Iran deserves better. The Iranian people deserve freedom. May God protect the Iranian freedom fighters. May truth and justice prevail. May light break through - for Iran and for the entire region. ✝️❤️‍🔥🪽🙏

Krisztina Maria

168,088 views • 5 months ago

REVEALED: Israeli spy agency Mossad sold Donald Trump a plot to instantly take out Iran—but it had one fatal flaw. And that one little mistake has put the United States firmly in the crosshairs of a war it cannot win—and is creating global panic over oil prices. . The top secret dossier, sold to the US by Mossad director David Barnea had a clear argument, that we can summarize as a four part narrative. One: A network of fake “Iranian NGOs” in the west would circulate a story that Iran had massacred 30,000 or more peaceful protesters, The story would be spread in order to manufacture consent for the west to launch a war against Iran. Two: The Americans would demand to have negotiations with the Iranians to distract them, by having them focusing on peace plans. Three: During this distraction, the US and Israeli air forces would then launch an attack that would take out the entire government of Iran, leaving all seats of power empty—including the peace negotiators. Four: Radical extreme opposition members in Iran, cultivated by Mossad, the CIA, and the NED, would then take control of the country—and install US puppet Reza Pahlavi as a proxy for Washington and Tel Aviv. . IT WORKED. AT FIRST And you know what? Every part of that plan worked perfectly. Except there was one key detail they had got wrong. And that brought the whole edifice crashing down. . ONE: DEMONIZING IRAN The story really starts in January. Mossad and the CIA worked with radical opposition members in Iran to launch a coup at the start of January in which armed men destroyed 700 shops, 305 ambulances and buses, 414 civil service buildings and 750 banks. [SEE VIDEO] They attacked 350 mosques, which is very strange for supposedly Muslim rioters– but they attacked not one synagogue. This was a major insurrection in which people on all sides lost their lives, with more than 3,000 dead after the coup was put down. But this armed coup was repackaged by fake NGOs in the west as a massacre of at least 30,000 peaceful protesters - or maybe 50,000 or 70,000 - by “the regime”. Mossad wanted the fake number to be more than the actual number of people the IDF killed in Gaza. This part worked perfectly. Here’s Time magazine [video] reporting that 30,000 died. Most of the western media supported this. Not one of them reported that the funding for these NGOs could be traced back to western political propaganda groups such as the NED, a CIA spin-off group. . TWO: FAKE PEACE NEGOTIATIONS Part Two of the plan also went better than they could have hoped for. The Americans not only successfully held "peace negotiations", but the Iranians actually made multiple concessions, giving Washington virtually everything it wanted. So the Americans could simply have proceeded with those and got what they wanted anyway. But the US and Israel decided to go ahead with Part Three anyway. (More 'fun'?) . THREE: KILLING GOVERNMENT LEADERS And you know what? That also worked perfectly, from beginning to end – in a surprise, unprovoked attack, the US and Israel killed not just the leader, but 40 members of the Iranian government. Now just imagine the outrage if any country took out the entire government of the UK or Germany or Canada or Australia. The world’s media would be writing editorials about it for years, literally years. . FOUR: THE PUPPET The Mossad-CIA plot was going exactly as planned. All they needed to do was achieve part four: the transfer of power to a US Juan Guaidó figure—a man already selected and waiting in the wings. The western media found supporters of the opposition in Iran to film expressing happiness, and tried to pretend that this was “all” the Iranians. But this was clearly not true. The vast majority of Iranians, including people involved in the violent protest of January, were horrified. . FATAL FLAW Now here’s where the fatal error showed up. Mossad’s plan failed to take into account one thing. There had been a change of attitude last year. Between June the 13th and the 24th of 2025, Israel attacked Iran, killing nuclear scientists, politicians and civilians, as well as members of the armed forces. That was also, clearly an illegal, unprovoked attack. No western leader cared—but the people of Iran, all the political parties, did care. They were outraged. Why are Israel and the United States allowed to just murder people in other countries and get away it? Support for the Iranian government rose dramatically. Mossad assumed that because their contacts, the extreme radical members of the opposition groups, still opposed the government, that many Iranians did. But that just was not true. The Iranians in general had become far more supportive of their government, and opposed to the US and Israel, than Mossad believed. . IRANIANS UNITED Donald Trump told the Iranian people that it was now over to you – signalling that part four should go ahead: a takeover by people allied to Washington and Tel Aviv. But it didn’t happen. So part four of the plan did not work. The Iranians drew together and fought back. Under United Nations law, they had full legal rights to respond to an illegal attack. They made defensive forays to take out the military bases around the gulf which were attacking them, and they closed the Strait of Hormuz. Trump was horrified and furious – not with the Iranians but with Netanyahu and Barnea, the Mossad chief. And this explains why he kept making contradictory statements – he kept saying things that implied the war would be over very quickly, as the original plan said, while also acknowledging that the opposite was true. Remember how he used the phrase “short term excursion”. He also said the war would last four days only. And he also said the war was “already over”. And so on. So we can see that the plan, as sold to him, was a quick in-and-out operation, just as it had been in Venezuela – so that was what he had in his head. . IF YOU SHOOT THE KING… Netanyahu, deeply embarrassed to have helped sell a war to Trump that had spiralled out of control, went into hiding—he was so deep undercover that rumours circulated that said he was dead. For Mossad and the CIA, the plot failed. There’s an ancient saying that all plotters know. “If you are going to shoot at the king, you better kill the king.” What the US and Israel did was shoot the leadership of Iran. But they failed to kill the leadership of Iran. So now they are in trouble. And you know what? I don’t think there is any sympathy for them.

REVEALED: Israeli spy agency Mossad sold Donald Trump a plot to instantly take out Iran—but it had one fatal flaw. And that one little mistake has put the United States firmly in the crosshairs of a war it cannot win—and is creating global panic over oil prices. . The top secret dossier, sold to the US by Mossad director David Barnea had a clear argument, that we can summarize as a four part narrative. One: A network of fake “Iranian NGOs” in the west would circulate a story that Iran had massacred 30,000 or more peaceful protesters, The story would be spread in order to manufacture consent for the west to launch a war against Iran. Two: The Americans would demand to have negotiations with the Iranians to distract them, by having them focusing on peace plans. Three: During this distraction, the US and Israeli air forces would then launch an attack that would take out the entire government of Iran, leaving all seats of power empty—including the peace negotiators. Four: Radical extreme opposition members in Iran, cultivated by Mossad, the CIA, and the NED, would then take control of the country—and install US puppet Reza Pahlavi as a proxy for Washington and Tel Aviv. . IT WORKED. AT FIRST And you know what? Every part of that plan worked perfectly. Except there was one key detail they had got wrong. And that brought the whole edifice crashing down. . ONE: DEMONIZING IRAN The story really starts in January. Mossad and the CIA worked with radical opposition members in Iran to launch a coup at the start of January in which armed men destroyed 700 shops, 305 ambulances and buses, 414 civil service buildings and 750 banks. [SEE VIDEO] They attacked 350 mosques, which is very strange for supposedly Muslim rioters– but they attacked not one synagogue. This was a major insurrection in which people on all sides lost their lives, with more than 3,000 dead after the coup was put down. But this armed coup was repackaged by fake NGOs in the west as a massacre of at least 30,000 peaceful protesters - or maybe 50,000 or 70,000 - by “the regime”. Mossad wanted the fake number to be more than the actual number of people the IDF killed in Gaza. This part worked perfectly. Here’s Time magazine [video] reporting that 30,000 died. Most of the western media supported this. Not one of them reported that the funding for these NGOs could be traced back to western political propaganda groups such as the NED, a CIA spin-off group. . TWO: FAKE PEACE NEGOTIATIONS Part Two of the plan also went better than they could have hoped for. The Americans not only successfully held "peace negotiations", but the Iranians actually made multiple concessions, giving Washington virtually everything it wanted. So the Americans could simply have proceeded with those and got what they wanted anyway. But the US and Israel decided to go ahead with Part Three anyway. (More 'fun'?) . THREE: KILLING GOVERNMENT LEADERS And you know what? That also worked perfectly, from beginning to end – in a surprise, unprovoked attack, the US and Israel killed not just the leader, but 40 members of the Iranian government. Now just imagine the outrage if any country took out the entire government of the UK or Germany or Canada or Australia. The world’s media would be writing editorials about it for years, literally years. . FOUR: THE PUPPET The Mossad-CIA plot was going exactly as planned. All they needed to do was achieve part four: the transfer of power to a US Juan Guaidó figure—a man already selected and waiting in the wings. The western media found supporters of the opposition in Iran to film expressing happiness, and tried to pretend that this was “all” the Iranians. But this was clearly not true. The vast majority of Iranians, including people involved in the violent protest of January, were horrified. . FATAL FLAW Now here’s where the fatal error showed up. Mossad’s plan failed to take into account one thing. There had been a change of attitude last year. Between June the 13th and the 24th of 2025, Israel attacked Iran, killing nuclear scientists, politicians and civilians, as well as members of the armed forces. That was also, clearly an illegal, unprovoked attack. No western leader cared—but the people of Iran, all the political parties, did care. They were outraged. Why are Israel and the United States allowed to just murder people in other countries and get away it? Support for the Iranian government rose dramatically. Mossad assumed that because their contacts, the extreme radical members of the opposition groups, still opposed the government, that many Iranians did. But that just was not true. The Iranians in general had become far more supportive of their government, and opposed to the US and Israel, than Mossad believed. . IRANIANS UNITED Donald Trump told the Iranian people that it was now over to you – signalling that part four should go ahead: a takeover by people allied to Washington and Tel Aviv. But it didn’t happen. So part four of the plan did not work. The Iranians drew together and fought back. Under United Nations law, they had full legal rights to respond to an illegal attack. They made defensive forays to take out the military bases around the gulf which were attacking them, and they closed the Strait of Hormuz. Trump was horrified and furious – not with the Iranians but with Netanyahu and Barnea, the Mossad chief. And this explains why he kept making contradictory statements – he kept saying things that implied the war would be over very quickly, as the original plan said, while also acknowledging that the opposite was true. Remember how he used the phrase “short term excursion”. He also said the war would last four days only. And he also said the war was “already over”. And so on. So we can see that the plan, as sold to him, was a quick in-and-out operation, just as it had been in Venezuela – so that was what he had in his head. . IF YOU SHOOT THE KING… Netanyahu, deeply embarrassed to have helped sell a war to Trump that had spiralled out of control, went into hiding—he was so deep undercover that rumours circulated that said he was dead. For Mossad and the CIA, the plot failed. There’s an ancient saying that all plotters know. “If you are going to shoot at the king, you better kill the king.” What the US and Israel did was shoot the leadership of Iran. But they failed to kill the leadership of Iran. So now they are in trouble. And you know what? I don’t think there is any sympathy for them.

Nury Vittachi

366,788 views • 4 months ago

Here are 10 mind-blowing realities about Iran that many don’t know. Without knowing them you miss out on so much of what is really happening right now. 1. You have probably heard restoring the old flag emoji is a hot topic now. The current regime's flag has "Allah" in Arabic script right in the middle. If you look closely you can see it. On the green and red borders there are 22 "Allahu Akbar". You never hear a single "Allahu Akbar" from all these huge protests in Iran. It is no coincidence. The entire fight is about Iranians distancing themselves from exactly that forced Islamic slogan. Elon Musk already turned back the true ancient Iran flag emoji on X. The one with the Lion and Sun. There are thousands of years of history behind it. The Lion is the king of the jungle symbol of the Shah. The Sun stands for Mitra the ancient Iranian god of light. The sword in the lion's hand stands for the Shah's legitimacy to use force only to defend the people and deliver justice. 2. The color of ayatollahs' turbans has deep meaning. Black turbans mean descent from the Prophet Muhammad who was Arab not Persian. White turbans mean purely Iranian roots. Khomeini and Khamenei wear black. That is why many Iranians see them as foreigners not legitimate rulers. These days many slogans call Khamenei Zahhak. Zahhak is an evil foreign tyrant from the Shahnameh. He fed two snakes on his shoulders with the brains of young Iranians. Kaveh the Blacksmith lost his last son to Zahhak. He raised his leather apron on a stick as a banner and rallied the people. They overthrew Zahhak. In 2017 housewife Vida Movahed tied her white hijab to a stick like Kaveh's banner. She waved it silently on a utility box for half an hour. She was arrested and jailed for years. That quiet act became the turning point. It reminded people of their power. Today's protests are the result of years of daily struggle following Vida. 3. Khomeini was in Paris before the 1979 revolution. No Middle Eastern country took him because of terror links. France welcomed him. Western leftists especially pro-Palestine ones who hated the Shah for supporting Israel turned him into an anti-colonialist hero. They ran huge anti-Shah campaigns distorted death tolls spread blood libels and painted the Shah as a monster. They showed Khomeini as the freedom fighter who would bring democracy. Khomeini returned on Air France with French escort. Western countries recognized him instead of the Shah. Once in power he used Iran's money to start terrorist attacks across the West. He executed thousands of those same leftists and buried them in mass graves. The monster they created turned on them first. 4. Very few knew when Khomeini returned the Shah had advanced cancer. Many blamed him for not fighting harder. One year later he died in exile in Cairo. He refused to kill his people because he was dying anyway. At his funeral former U.S. President Richard Nixon and Anwar Sadat honored him. Sadat called him a true friend. One year later Sadat was assassinated by the same pro-Palestinian leftists for supporting Israel and standing by the Shah. 5. The regime tried hard to destroy the Shah's children. They had all the money and power. They wanted to kill them like the Romanovs or scare them away forever like Afghanistan's royals. But Reza Pahlavi stayed strong and became the voice of the people. The constant harassment threats and pressure took two siblings. Ali Reza and Leila died by suicide in exile. The pain of losing country father and endless attacks is heartbreaking. That is why we Iranians adore Reza so much. We are deeply grateful. We know he had every reason to walk away. Yet he chose to stay and stand with us. He is the real voice who stayed through all the pain. Share if any shocked you. Stay tuned for the next 5. #IranRevolution2026 #Iran #IranProtests #MIGA #جاويدشاه‌

Here are 10 mind-blowing realities about Iran that many don’t know. Without knowing them you miss out on so much of what is really happening right now. 1. You have probably heard restoring the old flag emoji is a hot topic now. The current regime's flag has "Allah" in Arabic script right in the middle. If you look closely you can see it. On the green and red borders there are 22 "Allahu Akbar". You never hear a single "Allahu Akbar" from all these huge protests in Iran. It is no coincidence. The entire fight is about Iranians distancing themselves from exactly that forced Islamic slogan. Elon Musk already turned back the true ancient Iran flag emoji on X. The one with the Lion and Sun. There are thousands of years of history behind it. The Lion is the king of the jungle symbol of the Shah. The Sun stands for Mitra the ancient Iranian god of light. The sword in the lion's hand stands for the Shah's legitimacy to use force only to defend the people and deliver justice. 2. The color of ayatollahs' turbans has deep meaning. Black turbans mean descent from the Prophet Muhammad who was Arab not Persian. White turbans mean purely Iranian roots. Khomeini and Khamenei wear black. That is why many Iranians see them as foreigners not legitimate rulers. These days many slogans call Khamenei Zahhak. Zahhak is an evil foreign tyrant from the Shahnameh. He fed two snakes on his shoulders with the brains of young Iranians. Kaveh the Blacksmith lost his last son to Zahhak. He raised his leather apron on a stick as a banner and rallied the people. They overthrew Zahhak. In 2017 housewife Vida Movahed tied her white hijab to a stick like Kaveh's banner. She waved it silently on a utility box for half an hour. She was arrested and jailed for years. That quiet act became the turning point. It reminded people of their power. Today's protests are the result of years of daily struggle following Vida. 3. Khomeini was in Paris before the 1979 revolution. No Middle Eastern country took him because of terror links. France welcomed him. Western leftists especially pro-Palestine ones who hated the Shah for supporting Israel turned him into an anti-colonialist hero. They ran huge anti-Shah campaigns distorted death tolls spread blood libels and painted the Shah as a monster. They showed Khomeini as the freedom fighter who would bring democracy. Khomeini returned on Air France with French escort. Western countries recognized him instead of the Shah. Once in power he used Iran's money to start terrorist attacks across the West. He executed thousands of those same leftists and buried them in mass graves. The monster they created turned on them first. 4. Very few knew when Khomeini returned the Shah had advanced cancer. Many blamed him for not fighting harder. One year later he died in exile in Cairo. He refused to kill his people because he was dying anyway. At his funeral former U.S. President Richard Nixon and Anwar Sadat honored him. Sadat called him a true friend. One year later Sadat was assassinated by the same pro-Palestinian leftists for supporting Israel and standing by the Shah. 5. The regime tried hard to destroy the Shah's children. They had all the money and power. They wanted to kill them like the Romanovs or scare them away forever like Afghanistan's royals. But Reza Pahlavi stayed strong and became the voice of the people. The constant harassment threats and pressure took two siblings. Ali Reza and Leila died by suicide in exile. The pain of losing country father and endless attacks is heartbreaking. That is why we Iranians adore Reza so much. We are deeply grateful. We know he had every reason to walk away. Yet he chose to stay and stand with us. He is the real voice who stayed through all the pain. Share if any shocked you. Stay tuned for the next 5. #IranRevolution2026 #Iran #IranProtests #MIGA #جاويدشاه‌

Ida Turan 🇮🇷 ایده توران

133,366 views • 7 months ago

This is Mohammed Reza Shah of Iran before 1979. The father of Reza Pahlavi, the same man who now wants to rule Iran and fool the West into thinking Iran is “occupied” by Islamists or that the current Persian Islamic regime is somehow “un-Iranian.” Meanwhile, Iran’s system is Persian-centralized. Persians make up about 55% of the population, yet they account for 78% of high-ranking officials. Reza Pahlavi claims Persians aren’t Muslim, yet his own father, Mohammed Reza, was a practicing Shia Muslim who visited Mecca regularly and ruled with an iron fist over minorities. Now we live in a world where Pahlavi and his supporters are spreading propaganda and outright lies, and non-Iranians in the West are falling for it and victimizing Persians in their own country under the same regime they chose. Let this sink in: Iran, like most of the Middle East, is majority Muslim, specifically Shia Muslim. So if you continue to fall for their fake narrative, just know I warned you with FACTS.

This is Mohammed Reza Shah of Iran before 1979. The father of Reza Pahlavi, the same man who now wants to rule Iran and fool the West into thinking Iran is “occupied” by Islamists or that the current Persian Islamic regime is somehow “un-Iranian.” Meanwhile, Iran’s system is Persian-centralized. Persians make up about 55% of the population, yet they account for 78% of high-ranking officials. Reza Pahlavi claims Persians aren’t Muslim, yet his own father, Mohammed Reza, was a practicing Shia Muslim who visited Mecca regularly and ruled with an iron fist over minorities. Now we live in a world where Pahlavi and his supporters are spreading propaganda and outright lies, and non-Iranians in the West are falling for it and victimizing Persians in their own country under the same regime they chose. Let this sink in: Iran, like most of the Middle East, is majority Muslim, specifically Shia Muslim. So if you continue to fall for their fake narrative, just know I warned you with FACTS.

Ashti Waissi

61,930 views • 4 months ago

Here is Yasmin Vossoughian Reports talking to someone inside Iran. This is journalism, not what CNN is doing by sending Frederik Pleitgen to Iran as journalist who is controlled by the regime and only reports regime propaganda narratives. Also, this is for the “Pahlavi has no support in Iran” & “no one knows who Pahlavi is in Iran” crowd. And for those who have been attacking the diaspora/Iranians inside Iran, calling them “vatan foroush” aka “one who sells out their own country” People need to stop pretending they speak for Iranians inside Iran while ignoring what many inside Iran are actually saying. Even in this clip, our brother inside Iran clearly says people support Reza Pahlavi and need someone like him. You do not have to “want war” to understand why many Iranians believe the regime cannot be defeated by bare hands against Basij, and the IRGC. No sane Iranian wants to see their homeland bombed, but the blame for where we are belongs first and foremost to the Islamic Republic, not to Iranians in the diaspora and not to Iranians inside Iran who believe outside help is necessary. We heard the same arguments during the June 2025 war, and I told y’all, if the regime survives more Iranians will be killed than you can imagine. Less than a year later, 32k+ Iranians were killed in the regime’s own crackdown as I called it. Compare that to the numbers during these two wars, which include high rate of IRGC & regime officials. So I genuinely want to understand the logic of attacking the very people who are standing with Iranians inside Iran. I personally have always echoed the voices of people inside Iran and what they tell me. If your position is always “I hate the regime, but…” and that “but” always ends with protecting the conditions that keep it alive, then what exactly are you offering the Iranian people besides more death and more time under this regime? So before you jump to attack, please just listen to what people are saying in Iran. I’m not attacking anyone, I’m just trying to have a fair dialogue, to get an understanding on where my misunderstanding might be. Long Live Iran 🇮🇷

Here is Yasmin Vossoughian Reports talking to someone inside Iran. This is journalism, not what CNN is doing by sending Frederik Pleitgen to Iran as journalist who is controlled by the regime and only reports regime propaganda narratives. Also, this is for the “Pahlavi has no support in Iran” & “no one knows who Pahlavi is in Iran” crowd. And for those who have been attacking the diaspora/Iranians inside Iran, calling them “vatan foroush” aka “one who sells out their own country” People need to stop pretending they speak for Iranians inside Iran while ignoring what many inside Iran are actually saying. Even in this clip, our brother inside Iran clearly says people support Reza Pahlavi and need someone like him. You do not have to “want war” to understand why many Iranians believe the regime cannot be defeated by bare hands against Basij, and the IRGC. No sane Iranian wants to see their homeland bombed, but the blame for where we are belongs first and foremost to the Islamic Republic, not to Iranians in the diaspora and not to Iranians inside Iran who believe outside help is necessary. We heard the same arguments during the June 2025 war, and I told y’all, if the regime survives more Iranians will be killed than you can imagine. Less than a year later, 32k+ Iranians were killed in the regime’s own crackdown as I called it. Compare that to the numbers during these two wars, which include high rate of IRGC & regime officials. So I genuinely want to understand the logic of attacking the very people who are standing with Iranians inside Iran. I personally have always echoed the voices of people inside Iran and what they tell me. If your position is always “I hate the regime, but…” and that “but” always ends with protecting the conditions that keep it alive, then what exactly are you offering the Iranian people besides more death and more time under this regime? So before you jump to attack, please just listen to what people are saying in Iran. I’m not attacking anyone, I’m just trying to have a fair dialogue, to get an understanding on where my misunderstanding might be. Long Live Iran 🇮🇷

🇺🇸🇮🇷پیام-Payam

60,394 views • 5 months ago

Kishore Mahbubani (Kishore Mahbubani): The West has, in global terms, become a lonely, narcissistic civilization, self-absorbed in itself, very happy with itself, and therefore, with this narcissism, has blinded itself to the mistakes that it has made in dealing with the rest of the world. And I want to begin the story, in some ways, with the end of the Cold War in 1990, because I’m sure you all remember how the West celebrated, how happy the West was that it defeated the Soviet Union without firing a shot, and the West thought, “Hey, we have arrived.” And you even believed—this is amazing—almost everyone in the West believed that you had reached the end of history. Hooray! We don’t have to struggle anymore. We’ve made it. We made it to the top. We’ve achieved these liberal democratic societies, which are the best societies in the world. We succeeded. We have made it. The rest of you, the rest of the world, you’re going to struggle. We don’t have to struggle. And one statistic that I’m surprised that so few in the West are aware of is that the West only makes up 12% of the world’s population. Twelve percent. Eighty-eight percent lives outside the West. And the West crazily assumed at that moment of history, when it reached the end of history, that the rest of the world would come and become replicas of the West. Copy you. Follow you. And become like you. I’m sure you’ll all agree that that’s a somewhat arrogant assumption on the part of the West. But that arrogance dominated the worldview of all the Western intellectuals at that time. I know it so well because, by an accident of history, I spent a year in Harvard in ’91–’92. And I drowned in that arrogance. I could feel how the West had arrived and succeeded, and the rest of you poor chaps, get used to it, adjust to it, move on. So, the reason why that arrogance at that point was a major strategic mistake was because that arrogance put the West to sleep at precisely the moment when the other civilizations decided to wake up. So, you close your eyes when the rest of the world was waking up. And remember, China had started its Four Modernizations program in 1979 and, by 1989–1990, was gaining a lot of momentum. And then India also woke up around the early 1990s as a result of crisis, by the way. In both cases, China went through a major crisis and said, “Okay, enough is enough. Time for us to get sensible and do the right thing.” India went through a major crisis and said, “Enough is enough. Let’s do the right thing.” And, of course, what you’ve seen since then, in the case of the Chinese, the Chinese civilization has been around for 4,000 years, and the last 40 years of economic and social development in China have been the best 40 years in 4,000 years of Chinese history. And the West said, “It cannot be. They’re not like us. They cannot be succeeding. Right?” Because you assume to succeed, you must be liberal democratic. So, that clearly, that’s why I think the end-of-history moment was a disastrous moment for the West because they put the West to sleep at precisely the moment when the rest was waking up.

Kishore Mahbubani (Kishore Mahbubani): The West has, in global terms, become a lonely, narcissistic civilization, self-absorbed in itself, very happy with itself, and therefore, with this narcissism, has blinded itself to the mistakes that it has made in dealing with the rest of the world. And I want to begin the story, in some ways, with the end of the Cold War in 1990, because I’m sure you all remember how the West celebrated, how happy the West was that it defeated the Soviet Union without firing a shot, and the West thought, “Hey, we have arrived.” And you even believed—this is amazing—almost everyone in the West believed that you had reached the end of history. Hooray! We don’t have to struggle anymore. We’ve made it. We made it to the top. We’ve achieved these liberal democratic societies, which are the best societies in the world. We succeeded. We have made it. The rest of you, the rest of the world, you’re going to struggle. We don’t have to struggle. And one statistic that I’m surprised that so few in the West are aware of is that the West only makes up 12% of the world’s population. Twelve percent. Eighty-eight percent lives outside the West. And the West crazily assumed at that moment of history, when it reached the end of history, that the rest of the world would come and become replicas of the West. Copy you. Follow you. And become like you. I’m sure you’ll all agree that that’s a somewhat arrogant assumption on the part of the West. But that arrogance dominated the worldview of all the Western intellectuals at that time. I know it so well because, by an accident of history, I spent a year in Harvard in ’91–’92. And I drowned in that arrogance. I could feel how the West had arrived and succeeded, and the rest of you poor chaps, get used to it, adjust to it, move on. So, the reason why that arrogance at that point was a major strategic mistake was because that arrogance put the West to sleep at precisely the moment when the other civilizations decided to wake up. So, you close your eyes when the rest of the world was waking up. And remember, China had started its Four Modernizations program in 1979 and, by 1989–1990, was gaining a lot of momentum. And then India also woke up around the early 1990s as a result of crisis, by the way. In both cases, China went through a major crisis and said, “Okay, enough is enough. Time for us to get sensible and do the right thing.” India went through a major crisis and said, “Enough is enough. Let’s do the right thing.” And, of course, what you’ve seen since then, in the case of the Chinese, the Chinese civilization has been around for 4,000 years, and the last 40 years of economic and social development in China have been the best 40 years in 4,000 years of Chinese history. And the West said, “It cannot be. They’re not like us. They cannot be succeeding. Right?” Because you assume to succeed, you must be liberal democratic. So, that clearly, that’s why I think the end-of-history moment was a disastrous moment for the West because they put the West to sleep at precisely the moment when the rest was waking up.

🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

32,390 views • 1 month ago

🚨PRINCE REZA PAHLAVI JUST DROPPED THE TRUTH BOMB! "One of the reasons the regime wants a TOTAL INTERNET BLACKOUT is that people like yourselves won't hear what the people in Iran actually have to SAY about this." "The narrative is CONTROLLED completely by the REGIME, and that's what he's trying to push, whether it’s the mainstream media in the outside world to let you believe that people are in fact REJECTING that INTERVENTION." It's actually quite the OPPOSITE. The majority of the Iranian people look at this as LIBERATION CAMPAIGN. "imagine the circumstances during the second world war, imagine you were a French person who was living under the occupation of the Nazi regime, and when the the allies disembarked in on the British of Normandy, that was a campaign for liberation of a country that would otherwise have to face Hitler and his regime." "in this case we are dealing with the regime that has from the very beginning taken our compatriots at their first HOSTAGES and have kept them behind bars, this intervention is LIBERATION for US, so it's a welcome act that will help us finally get RID of this regime, which is the final ask of the Iranian people." "They have had it with this regime, they no longer want it, this regime is totally ILLEGITIMATE, it's just trying to use COERCION and FEAR to maintain itself in POWER. And try to buy TIME and ride the storm so there's no longer a Bibi Netanyahu in Jerusalem or Donald Trump in the white house that could really put pressure on this regime. That's why tactically they are trying to buy time and that has always been their modus operandi in all these years." #RezaPahlavi‌ForIran Reza Pahlavi

🚨PRINCE REZA PAHLAVI JUST DROPPED THE TRUTH BOMB! "One of the reasons the regime wants a TOTAL INTERNET BLACKOUT is that people like yourselves won't hear what the people in Iran actually have to SAY about this." "The narrative is CONTROLLED completely by the REGIME, and that's what he's trying to push, whether it’s the mainstream media in the outside world to let you believe that people are in fact REJECTING that INTERVENTION." It's actually quite the OPPOSITE. The majority of the Iranian people look at this as LIBERATION CAMPAIGN. "imagine the circumstances during the second world war, imagine you were a French person who was living under the occupation of the Nazi regime, and when the the allies disembarked in on the British of Normandy, that was a campaign for liberation of a country that would otherwise have to face Hitler and his regime." "in this case we are dealing with the regime that has from the very beginning taken our compatriots at their first HOSTAGES and have kept them behind bars, this intervention is LIBERATION for US, so it's a welcome act that will help us finally get RID of this regime, which is the final ask of the Iranian people." "They have had it with this regime, they no longer want it, this regime is totally ILLEGITIMATE, it's just trying to use COERCION and FEAR to maintain itself in POWER. And try to buy TIME and ride the storm so there's no longer a Bibi Netanyahu in Jerusalem or Donald Trump in the white house that could really put pressure on this regime. That's why tactically they are trying to buy time and that has always been their modus operandi in all these years." #RezaPahlavi‌ForIran Reza Pahlavi

Neo

105,064 views • 3 months ago

🚨 WHAT HAPPENED TO IRAN IN 1979 DIDN’T START WITH A REVOLUTION — IT STARTED WITH A LIE In this powerful moment from my interview with Ida Turan, she explains how propaganda can reshape reality — and how the same tactics were used before the 1979 Iranian Revolution. As she describes it, the strategy was simple: Create a lie that is highly emotional — something involving children, suffering, or outrage — and repeat it so often that people stop questioning it. Eventually the narrative becomes accepted as fact. According to Ida, this is exactly what happened in the final years before the Shah was overthrown. Smear campaigns painted him as a monster. False stories spread through media networks. And one of the most notorious incidents — the Cinema Rex fire — was blamed on the Shah at the time, despite later evidence pointing elsewhere. The effect was devastating. Public trust collapsed. The army hesitated. And the door was opened for Khomeini’s Islamist regime to seize power. For many Iranians who lived through those events, the lesson is painfully clear: When propaganda replaces truth, entire nations can be pushed toward disaster. Ida’s message is not just about Iran’s past. It is a warning about how powerful narratives can shape history itself. Reza Pahlavi Reza Pahlavi Communications Ida Turan 🇮🇷 ایده توران

🚨 WHAT HAPPENED TO IRAN IN 1979 DIDN’T START WITH A REVOLUTION — IT STARTED WITH A LIE In this powerful moment from my interview with Ida Turan, she explains how propaganda can reshape reality — and how the same tactics were used before the 1979 Iranian Revolution. As she describes it, the strategy was simple: Create a lie that is highly emotional — something involving children, suffering, or outrage — and repeat it so often that people stop questioning it. Eventually the narrative becomes accepted as fact. According to Ida, this is exactly what happened in the final years before the Shah was overthrown. Smear campaigns painted him as a monster. False stories spread through media networks. And one of the most notorious incidents — the Cinema Rex fire — was blamed on the Shah at the time, despite later evidence pointing elsewhere. The effect was devastating. Public trust collapsed. The army hesitated. And the door was opened for Khomeini’s Islamist regime to seize power. For many Iranians who lived through those events, the lesson is painfully clear: When propaganda replaces truth, entire nations can be pushed toward disaster. Ida’s message is not just about Iran’s past. It is a warning about how powerful narratives can shape history itself. Reza Pahlavi Reza Pahlavi Communications Ida Turan 🇮🇷 ایده توران

Jim Ferguson

30,912 views • 5 months ago

The reason Iranian protesters are burning mosques, is not blind hatred, we are not Palestinians. It has a concrete, practical reason, and there is a very important lesson in it for you in the West. ‼️ These mosques are not places of worships, they serve as operation bases for the regime's militias in residential neighborhoods. Mosques house armories for the Basij militias. They function as headquarters for repression and temporary detention centers for protesters. Protesters burn these structures as a strategic step to weaken the regime's local oppression forces. Here is where you in the west must pay attention: In iran, for decades, mosques served as recruitment and indoctrination centers for the regime. The regime uses them to radicalize vulnerable people and transform them into hate filled killing machine against their own society. Decades of this preparation are now producing results. The same pattern is currently building in Western cities through mosques and community centers. These efforts are tied to groups such as the Muslim Brotherhood and pro-Palestine networks. Critics who point out this process are quickly accused of "Islamophobia". This accusation is a deliberate tactic. Do not accept it at face value. Iranians used to respect mosques as genuine places of worship. Photos show the Shah visiting the Imam Reza shrine with respect. They also show him performing Hajj in Mecca. Iranians rejected Islam only when the regime weaponized it for political power and control. Western societies should not fall for the same deceptions. Identify these structures and stop them before it is too late. #IranRevoIution2026

The reason Iranian protesters are burning mosques, is not blind hatred, we are not Palestinians. It has a concrete, practical reason, and there is a very important lesson in it for you in the West. ‼️ These mosques are not places of worships, they serve as operation bases for the regime's militias in residential neighborhoods. Mosques house armories for the Basij militias. They function as headquarters for repression and temporary detention centers for protesters. Protesters burn these structures as a strategic step to weaken the regime's local oppression forces. Here is where you in the west must pay attention: In iran, for decades, mosques served as recruitment and indoctrination centers for the regime. The regime uses them to radicalize vulnerable people and transform them into hate filled killing machine against their own society. Decades of this preparation are now producing results. The same pattern is currently building in Western cities through mosques and community centers. These efforts are tied to groups such as the Muslim Brotherhood and pro-Palestine networks. Critics who point out this process are quickly accused of "Islamophobia". This accusation is a deliberate tactic. Do not accept it at face value. Iranians used to respect mosques as genuine places of worship. Photos show the Shah visiting the Imam Reza shrine with respect. They also show him performing Hajj in Mecca. Iranians rejected Islam only when the regime weaponized it for political power and control. Western societies should not fall for the same deceptions. Identify these structures and stop them before it is too late. #IranRevoIution2026

Ida Turan 🇮🇷

687,951 views • 7 months ago

BOOKMARK, COPY OR DOWNLOAD THIS. Every time someone says “but the Iranians massacred 30,000 or 50,000 of their own peaceful protesters”, just share these 10 facts and/or the video. 1. In early January, Mossad and CIA assets armed radical opposition members in Iran to undertake an armed insurrection in which 3,000 people (on all sides) lost their lives. There’s plenty of video evidence for that. 2. That was turned into a fake massacre story of 30,000 or 50,000 or 70,000 victims, by so called “activist groups”, widely quoted, as fact, by the western mainstream media—although no evidence was provided. A simple investigation shows that every single one of these groups can be traced back to the US or its “five eyes” partners, the UK and Canada. 3. The western mainstream started pushing the fake story by quoting from a group called Human Rights in Iran, which is not in Iran—it’s from Virginia, home of the CIA, and is financed by the NED, the CIA’s soft-power spin off. 4. The fake news was backed up by a group called the Center for Human Rights in Iran, which is also NOT in Iran, and is also in the US. 5. Another group, Iran International, can be traced back to the UK. 6. Then there was the International Center for Human Rights, which turned out to be in Canada. 7. Still other sources backing the fake massacre turned out to be supporters of America’s Reza Pahlava (Juan Guaido II), such as the one quoted by Time magazine. 8. The most quoted person on western mainstream television is Masih Alinejad, who said “millions” were massacred. She worked for many years as a full-time anti-Iran propagandist, with financing from the NED and a salary from Voice of America. 9. The fake tale was further pushed by the Bouramond Center for Human Rights, another group financed by the NED, and 10. Tavaana, started by the US State Department and financed by USAID, a notorious group that disguises CIA politicking as aid. Those are the facts. Now here’s the key question: why does every western mainstream media group, not most, but… Every. Single. One. hide the above facts from their audiences? Delete the western mainstream media. Find out the truth for yourself.

BOOKMARK, COPY OR DOWNLOAD THIS. Every time someone says “but the Iranians massacred 30,000 or 50,000 of their own peaceful protesters”, just share these 10 facts and/or the video. 1. In early January, Mossad and CIA assets armed radical opposition members in Iran to undertake an armed insurrection in which 3,000 people (on all sides) lost their lives. There’s plenty of video evidence for that. 2. That was turned into a fake massacre story of 30,000 or 50,000 or 70,000 victims, by so called “activist groups”, widely quoted, as fact, by the western mainstream media—although no evidence was provided. A simple investigation shows that every single one of these groups can be traced back to the US or its “five eyes” partners, the UK and Canada. 3. The western mainstream started pushing the fake story by quoting from a group called Human Rights in Iran, which is not in Iran—it’s from Virginia, home of the CIA, and is financed by the NED, the CIA’s soft-power spin off. 4. The fake news was backed up by a group called the Center for Human Rights in Iran, which is also NOT in Iran, and is also in the US. 5. Another group, Iran International, can be traced back to the UK. 6. Then there was the International Center for Human Rights, which turned out to be in Canada. 7. Still other sources backing the fake massacre turned out to be supporters of America’s Reza Pahlava (Juan Guaido II), such as the one quoted by Time magazine. 8. The most quoted person on western mainstream television is Masih Alinejad, who said “millions” were massacred. She worked for many years as a full-time anti-Iran propagandist, with financing from the NED and a salary from Voice of America. 9. The fake tale was further pushed by the Bouramond Center for Human Rights, another group financed by the NED, and 10. Tavaana, started by the US State Department and financed by USAID, a notorious group that disguises CIA politicking as aid. Those are the facts. Now here’s the key question: why does every western mainstream media group, not most, but… Every. Single. One. hide the above facts from their audiences? Delete the western mainstream media. Find out the truth for yourself.

Nury Vittachi

243,057 views • 4 months ago

In ancient times, the Greeks, the Romans, and the entire West held Iran in profound respect. They were in awe of our civilizational prowess. We deeply inspired thinkers like Plato, Socrates, Heraclitus, and Nietzsche. Under the Pahlavis, Iran commanded the world's admiration once more. Reza Shah was reviving our Zoroastrian identity. But the Islamic Republic's arrival changed everything - in recent decades, we've lost our true identity to Islam. Iran has burned in the name of Islam, and that's the image the Western world absorbed: just another desert country filled with terrorist Muslims. This national uprising is shattering that paradigm. A free Iran, led by Pahlavi, will make Iran great again. The end of the Islamic regime will remind the world who we truly are: the land of the Aryans, progenitors of civilization, poetry, and philosophy - not a horde of terrorist Muslims. We gave humanity Zoroastrianism, the loftiest religious thought in history. Islam will remain a dark stain on our glorious past. We are rising again, as we always have - and despite the mainstream media's silence, the world is witnessing it.

In ancient times, the Greeks, the Romans, and the entire West held Iran in profound respect. They were in awe of our civilizational prowess. We deeply inspired thinkers like Plato, Socrates, Heraclitus, and Nietzsche. Under the Pahlavis, Iran commanded the world's admiration once more. Reza Shah was reviving our Zoroastrian identity. But the Islamic Republic's arrival changed everything - in recent decades, we've lost our true identity to Islam. Iran has burned in the name of Islam, and that's the image the Western world absorbed: just another desert country filled with terrorist Muslims. This national uprising is shattering that paradigm. A free Iran, led by Pahlavi, will make Iran great again. The end of the Islamic regime will remind the world who we truly are: the land of the Aryans, progenitors of civilization, poetry, and philosophy - not a horde of terrorist Muslims. We gave humanity Zoroastrianism, the loftiest religious thought in history. Islam will remain a dark stain on our glorious past. We are rising again, as we always have - and despite the mainstream media's silence, the world is witnessing it.

Zarathustrian

60,467 views • 7 months ago

This is hands-down the best explanation I've heard on why sanctions on Russia backfired, and why they were never going to succeed in the first place. By economist James K. Galbraith, professor at the University of Texas at Austin. Best quote of his explanation: "This is a situation in which the sanctions were imposed by one important sector of the world economy which then cut itself off from resources that it needs - and that's particularly true of Western Europe - in return for cutting Russia off from various things that Russia doesn't really need." Second best quote: "If you go back to the period before the introduction of the sanctions [...] the Russian economy was very heavily colonized by Western firms. That was true in automobiles, it was true in aircrafts, it was true in everything from fast food restaurants to big box stores. Western firms were present all throughout the Russian economy. A great many of them [...] either chose to exit Russia or were pressured to exit Russia after early 2022. So on what terms did they leave? Well, they were required, if they were leaving permanently, to sell their capital equipment, their factories and so forth, to let's say a Russian business which would get a loan from Russian banks or maybe have other sources of financing, at a very favorable price for the Russians. So effectively a lot of capital wealth, which was partly owned by the West, has been transferred to Russian ownership. And you now have an economy which is moving forward and has the advantage compared to Europe of relatively low resource costs because Russia is a great producer of resources, oil and gas and fertilizer and food stuff and so forth. And so while the Europeans are paying maybe twice in Germany what they were paying for energy, the Russians are not, they're paying perhaps less than they were paying before the war. So again I characterize the effect of the sanctions, in fact as being in certain respects a gift to the Russian economy. And this is, I think, quite different from what the authors of the sanctions expected. [...] And the essence of the situation is this would not have happened without the sanctions. You could have had the war, and it would have gone pretty much as it has gone. But the Russian government in 2022 was in no position to force the exit of Western firms. It didn't want to, wouldn't have done that. It was in no position to force its oligarchs to choose between Russia and the West. It didn't wish to do that. These choices were imposed by the West, and the results were actually, in many respects, favorable to the long-term independent development of the Russian Federation's economy."

This is hands-down the best explanation I've heard on why sanctions on Russia backfired, and why they were never going to succeed in the first place. By economist James K. Galbraith, professor at the University of Texas at Austin. Best quote of his explanation: "This is a situation in which the sanctions were imposed by one important sector of the world economy which then cut itself off from resources that it needs - and that's particularly true of Western Europe - in return for cutting Russia off from various things that Russia doesn't really need." Second best quote: "If you go back to the period before the introduction of the sanctions [...] the Russian economy was very heavily colonized by Western firms. That was true in automobiles, it was true in aircrafts, it was true in everything from fast food restaurants to big box stores. Western firms were present all throughout the Russian economy. A great many of them [...] either chose to exit Russia or were pressured to exit Russia after early 2022. So on what terms did they leave? Well, they were required, if they were leaving permanently, to sell their capital equipment, their factories and so forth, to let's say a Russian business which would get a loan from Russian banks or maybe have other sources of financing, at a very favorable price for the Russians. So effectively a lot of capital wealth, which was partly owned by the West, has been transferred to Russian ownership. And you now have an economy which is moving forward and has the advantage compared to Europe of relatively low resource costs because Russia is a great producer of resources, oil and gas and fertilizer and food stuff and so forth. And so while the Europeans are paying maybe twice in Germany what they were paying for energy, the Russians are not, they're paying perhaps less than they were paying before the war. So again I characterize the effect of the sanctions, in fact as being in certain respects a gift to the Russian economy. And this is, I think, quite different from what the authors of the sanctions expected. [...] And the essence of the situation is this would not have happened without the sanctions. You could have had the war, and it would have gone pretty much as it has gone. But the Russian government in 2022 was in no position to force the exit of Western firms. It didn't want to, wouldn't have done that. It was in no position to force its oligarchs to choose between Russia and the West. It didn't wish to do that. These choices were imposed by the West, and the results were actually, in many respects, favorable to the long-term independent development of the Russian Federation's economy."

Arnaud Bertrand

988,108 views • 2 years ago

NEW: The Iranian Army officers who publicly defected from the Islamist regime in Iran and pledged allegiance to Iran’s King-in-Exile Reza Shah Pahlavi II (Reza Pahlavi) and raised Iran’s Lion and Sun flag, have been identified as Colonel Ebrahim Aghaei Kamazani and Lieutenant Mohammad Reza Mohammadzadeh. Both served at the Parandak Air Defense Base and were residents of the Mehrabad Military Complex. The two officers said farewell to their friends the previous day, stating that they intended to undertake a “major deed,” and asked fellow military personnel to remain loyal to His Majesty Iran's King-in-Exile & National Leader, Reza Shah Pahlavi II and Iran's Lion and Sun flag. The viral video below appears to show the moment these Army (Artesh) officers were arrested by regime agents, as bystanders cheered for them and some attempted to intervene. In the footage, prior to their arrest, the officers call on Iranians to prepare for upcoming uprising against the regime to finally remove the regime. Other circulating videos also show them playing archival speeches of the late Shah of Iran, His Majesty Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi, Shahanshah Aryamehr and father of Reza Shah Pahlavi II. Commentary on social media has included calls for identifying the criminal regime agents involved and reporting them to the campaign, which was established by King Reza Pahlavi and a part of it is intended to document the totalitarian regime's crimes and abuses for future accountability. Parandak Air Defense Group 99 is an Iranian Air Defense unit within the Army’s Ground Forces and operates under the Khatam-al-Anbia Air Defense Headquarters, considered one of the regime's most strategic military commands. The unit is responsible for managing anti-aircraft systems, providing air-defense coverage, and conducting low-altitude protection for five of Iran’s nuclear facilities. This highlights the depth of defections within strategic units of Iran's Armed Forces. Such acts of defections, have become commonplace in Iran following the launch of the “National Cooperation to Save Iran” campaign by King Reza Pahlavi. The campaign seeks to organize and coordinate large-scale defections from inside Iran’s armed forces. According to the official reports, tens of thousands of Iranian military officers have already made contact through secure communications channels established under the direct oversight of King Reza II. Source: Iran Briefing via Amir Farshad EBRAHIMI #ابراهیم_آقایی_کمازانی #محمدرضا_محمدزاده #EbrahimAghaeiKamazani #MohammadRezaMohammadzadeh #KingRezaPahlavi

NEW: The Iranian Army officers who publicly defected from the Islamist regime in Iran and pledged allegiance to Iran’s King-in-Exile Reza Shah Pahlavi II (Reza Pahlavi) and raised Iran’s Lion and Sun flag, have been identified as Colonel Ebrahim Aghaei Kamazani and Lieutenant Mohammad Reza Mohammadzadeh. Both served at the Parandak Air Defense Base and were residents of the Mehrabad Military Complex. The two officers said farewell to their friends the previous day, stating that they intended to undertake a “major deed,” and asked fellow military personnel to remain loyal to His Majesty Iran's King-in-Exile & National Leader, Reza Shah Pahlavi II and Iran's Lion and Sun flag. The viral video below appears to show the moment these Army (Artesh) officers were arrested by regime agents, as bystanders cheered for them and some attempted to intervene. In the footage, prior to their arrest, the officers call on Iranians to prepare for upcoming uprising against the regime to finally remove the regime. Other circulating videos also show them playing archival speeches of the late Shah of Iran, His Majesty Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi, Shahanshah Aryamehr and father of Reza Shah Pahlavi II. Commentary on social media has included calls for identifying the criminal regime agents involved and reporting them to the campaign, which was established by King Reza Pahlavi and a part of it is intended to document the totalitarian regime's crimes and abuses for future accountability. Parandak Air Defense Group 99 is an Iranian Air Defense unit within the Army’s Ground Forces and operates under the Khatam-al-Anbia Air Defense Headquarters, considered one of the regime's most strategic military commands. The unit is responsible for managing anti-aircraft systems, providing air-defense coverage, and conducting low-altitude protection for five of Iran’s nuclear facilities. This highlights the depth of defections within strategic units of Iran's Armed Forces. Such acts of defections, have become commonplace in Iran following the launch of the “National Cooperation to Save Iran” campaign by King Reza Pahlavi. The campaign seeks to organize and coordinate large-scale defections from inside Iran’s armed forces. According to the official reports, tens of thousands of Iranian military officers have already made contact through secure communications channels established under the direct oversight of King Reza II. Source: Iran Briefing via Amir Farshad EBRAHIMI #ابراهیم_آقایی_کمازانی #محمدرضا_محمدزاده #EbrahimAghaeiKamazani #MohammadRezaMohammadzadeh #KingRezaPahlavi

Shayan News

15,740 views • 9 months ago

$🇮🇷 EMERGENCY INTERVIEW: U.S. TO STRIKE IRAN - WHAT COMES NEXT It’s almost definite now, Trump is planning to strike Iran. The only question is: What’s his objective? Is it a complete regime change, or a Venezuela-like goal to replace the Supreme Leader with a more lenient member of the same regime? If it’s the former, then Iran, and the region, are in deep trouble. My guest today, Quincy Institute’s Trita Parsi, escaped Iran during the 1979 revolution, and his family has been targeted and jailed by both the current regime and the previous Monarchy. He breaks down the repercussions of a regime change, how Iran will retaliate to U.S. strikes, and the increasing risk of a civil was in the country. He also makes a very interesting point: Iran is at the mercy of Israeli ambitions (the destruction of the current regime and the country’s military capabilities) and American/Gulf ambitions (a stable regime with possibly a new leader more friendly to the West). I enjoyed this interview as Trita, an expert in the region, does not take sides. He’s very critical of the current regime, not a fan of the previous one, and thinks any American strikes on the country could have devastating consequences. We both agreed: The current regime is terrible, but a regime change may end up being worse if not executed properly and carefully. 03:25 – The protests in Iran were not the trigger for war planning; if anything, they delayed it. 04:02 – The original justification for attacking Iran came from Israeli concerns over missile threats, not internal unrest. 06:41 – The roots of Iran's current instability lie in sanctions that intentionally devastated the middle class. 09:16 – Some Iranians now view outside military intervention as the only path to regime change due to desperation. 11:32 – Gulf states are alarmed by Israeli aggression and fear instability from regime collapse, despite opposing Iran. 14:13 – A power vacuum in Iran could lead to civil war, refugee flows, and wider regional destabilization. 17:24 – Saudi, Turkey, and Pakistan may be quietly forming a bloc to counterbalance Israeli hegemony in the region. 20:11 – Iran’s fractured opposition lacks strength partly because sanctions crushed the middle class that fuels reform. 23:17 – Reza Pahlavi has grown closer to Israel, leading to division and backlash within the exile opposition. 25:07 – Monarchist support in Iran is hard to quantify—some chants back him, others reject him outright. 26:09 – Pahlavi says he wants democracy, but critics argue his conduct and followers cast doubt on that claim. 31:50 – Trita Parsi’s family fled Iran before the revolution; both the Shah and the Islamic Republic persecuted them. 34:24 – Iran’s internet blackout has cut off communications, and exact casualty numbers remain unclear. 37:10 – Hundreds of regime security forces have also been killed, suggesting an unprecedented level of resistance. 39:42 – Kurdish separatist groups may be exploiting the unrest, but aren't representative of the broader protest movement. 43:32 – Israel may see Iran’s total collapse as a strategic goal, even if it causes long-term regional chaos. 45:28 – Sanctions have historically made democratic transitions harder by weakening civil society more than regimes. 47:16 – US interests differ from Israel’s: Washington may want regime change, but not a failed or fragmented state. 50:23 – A Maduro-style solution could be attempted, but unlike Venezuela, the US has fewer internal contacts in Iran. 51:39 – Israel may push for not just regime change but destruction of Iran’s entire military infrastructure.$

🇮🇷 EMERGENCY INTERVIEW: U.S. TO STRIKE IRAN - WHAT COMES NEXT It’s almost definite now, Trump is planning to strike Iran. The only question is: What’s his objective? Is it a complete regime change, or a Venezuela-like goal to replace the Supreme Leader with a more lenient member of the same regime? If it’s the former, then Iran, and the region, are in deep trouble. My guest today, Quincy Institute’s Trita Parsi, escaped Iran during the 1979 revolution, and his family has been targeted and jailed by both the current regime and the previous Monarchy. He breaks down the repercussions of a regime change, how Iran will retaliate to U.S. strikes, and the increasing risk of a civil was in the country. He also makes a very interesting point: Iran is at the mercy of Israeli ambitions (the destruction of the current regime and the country’s military capabilities) and American/Gulf ambitions (a stable regime with possibly a new leader more friendly to the West). I enjoyed this interview as Trita, an expert in the region, does not take sides. He’s very critical of the current regime, not a fan of the previous one, and thinks any American strikes on the country could have devastating consequences. We both agreed: The current regime is terrible, but a regime change may end up being worse if not executed properly and carefully. 03:25 – The protests in Iran were not the trigger for war planning; if anything, they delayed it. 04:02 – The original justification for attacking Iran came from Israeli concerns over missile threats, not internal unrest. 06:41 – The roots of Iran's current instability lie in sanctions that intentionally devastated the middle class. 09:16 – Some Iranians now view outside military intervention as the only path to regime change due to desperation. 11:32 – Gulf states are alarmed by Israeli aggression and fear instability from regime collapse, despite opposing Iran. 14:13 – A power vacuum in Iran could lead to civil war, refugee flows, and wider regional destabilization. 17:24 – Saudi, Turkey, and Pakistan may be quietly forming a bloc to counterbalance Israeli hegemony in the region. 20:11 – Iran’s fractured opposition lacks strength partly because sanctions crushed the middle class that fuels reform. 23:17 – Reza Pahlavi has grown closer to Israel, leading to division and backlash within the exile opposition. 25:07 – Monarchist support in Iran is hard to quantify—some chants back him, others reject him outright. 26:09 – Pahlavi says he wants democracy, but critics argue his conduct and followers cast doubt on that claim. 31:50 – Trita Parsi’s family fled Iran before the revolution; both the Shah and the Islamic Republic persecuted them. 34:24 – Iran’s internet blackout has cut off communications, and exact casualty numbers remain unclear. 37:10 – Hundreds of regime security forces have also been killed, suggesting an unprecedented level of resistance. 39:42 – Kurdish separatist groups may be exploiting the unrest, but aren't representative of the broader protest movement. 43:32 – Israel may see Iran’s total collapse as a strategic goal, even if it causes long-term regional chaos. 45:28 – Sanctions have historically made democratic transitions harder by weakening civil society more than regimes. 47:16 – US interests differ from Israel’s: Washington may want regime change, but not a failed or fragmented state. 50:23 – A Maduro-style solution could be attempted, but unlike Venezuela, the US has fewer internal contacts in Iran. 51:39 – Israel may push for not just regime change but destruction of Iran’s entire military infrastructure.

Mario Nawfal

3,979,356 views • 7 months ago

I hope Americans wake up and realize that Muslims do not want to take away only your dogs. They want to take away your freedom of having dogs. It is about control and dominance. This pro-Palestinian Mamdani supporter Nerdeen Kiswani just posted that finally NYC is coming to Islam. She means Islam is taking over New York. She added that dogs definitely have a place in society but just not as indoor pets. She said like we have said all along they are unclean. She puts herself in a position to dictate what her host society in the West should look like. Then Congressman Randy Fine replied that if they force us to choose the choice between dogs and Muslims is not a difficult one. As an Iranian and a Muslim I am totally in line with this statement. He is totally right. I have been to Mecca and I own a dog myself. But then Jake Tapper the CNN guy came to the rescue screaming disgusting bigotry. Gavin Newsom said resign now you racist slob. Apparently the Governor of California is not educated enough to know that Islam is not a race. He does not seem to understand that Muslims can actually choose to be civilized respectful citizens and not dominating savages. This is not about dogs. This is not about Islam. It is about control and domination. I am Iranian. We have been through this before. Iranians are Muslims. Our Shah our king his first name was “Mohammad” Reza for God's sake. But still they managed to take power in Iran in the name of Islam. Back in 1979, Islamists had no luck until France welcomed Khomeini as a refugee. There the same exact cult the pro-Palestine leftists helped him to portray the Shah of Iran as the ultimate enemy a corrupt regime that must be annihilated. Among all Shah’s crimes being pro-West pro-US pro-Israel supportive of women's rights his worst crime was loving dogs. Not just as family members but he funded and equipped hospitals for pets. The leftists liberals Democrats corrupt elite in academia and media portrayed this monster as a freedom fighter spread lies about the Shah on BBC rioted against him. They enabled Islamists secretly gave weapons to them. They took Iran toppled the Shah through extreme violence. Now in Iran dogs are not legally allowed as pets. People still have them of course but they have to hide them and wait until dark to take them out. Because authorities not only seize them and kill them they fine them massively or punish by 70 lashes. This is the reality under Shia Islamic rule the Islamo-leftists. The issue with many Americans is that they only know Sunni Islam from 9/11. But Mamdani Khomeini Khamenei they are Shia Muslims. They play the oppressed card and use Islam as a tool for power. Mamdani's mother was partying with Bill Clinton and Jeff Bezos at Epstein place in 2009. He has been groomed to seize power behind this façade of a grassroots pro-Palestine Muslim. And just like in Iran the enablers which I call traitors are the Democrats and the corrupt elite in academia and media. So Americans please do not be naive. Do not hand your freedom to these enemies of life. Protect what you have unapologetically and fiercely. Otherwise you will have to fight to get it back just like Iranians are still fighting today. Do not think it will not happen to you. It will if you do not stand up now. Choose freedom. Do not give in to their lies. Choose dogs. Be like Congressman Randy Fine not Jake Tapper 🦅 . Share if this wakes you up. From an Iranian who lived it.

I hope Americans wake up and realize that Muslims do not want to take away only your dogs. They want to take away your freedom of having dogs. It is about control and dominance. This pro-Palestinian Mamdani supporter Nerdeen Kiswani just posted that finally NYC is coming to Islam. She means Islam is taking over New York. She added that dogs definitely have a place in society but just not as indoor pets. She said like we have said all along they are unclean. She puts herself in a position to dictate what her host society in the West should look like. Then Congressman Randy Fine replied that if they force us to choose the choice between dogs and Muslims is not a difficult one. As an Iranian and a Muslim I am totally in line with this statement. He is totally right. I have been to Mecca and I own a dog myself. But then Jake Tapper the CNN guy came to the rescue screaming disgusting bigotry. Gavin Newsom said resign now you racist slob. Apparently the Governor of California is not educated enough to know that Islam is not a race. He does not seem to understand that Muslims can actually choose to be civilized respectful citizens and not dominating savages. This is not about dogs. This is not about Islam. It is about control and domination. I am Iranian. We have been through this before. Iranians are Muslims. Our Shah our king his first name was “Mohammad” Reza for God's sake. But still they managed to take power in Iran in the name of Islam. Back in 1979, Islamists had no luck until France welcomed Khomeini as a refugee. There the same exact cult the pro-Palestine leftists helped him to portray the Shah of Iran as the ultimate enemy a corrupt regime that must be annihilated. Among all Shah’s crimes being pro-West pro-US pro-Israel supportive of women's rights his worst crime was loving dogs. Not just as family members but he funded and equipped hospitals for pets. The leftists liberals Democrats corrupt elite in academia and media portrayed this monster as a freedom fighter spread lies about the Shah on BBC rioted against him. They enabled Islamists secretly gave weapons to them. They took Iran toppled the Shah through extreme violence. Now in Iran dogs are not legally allowed as pets. People still have them of course but they have to hide them and wait until dark to take them out. Because authorities not only seize them and kill them they fine them massively or punish by 70 lashes. This is the reality under Shia Islamic rule the Islamo-leftists. The issue with many Americans is that they only know Sunni Islam from 9/11. But Mamdani Khomeini Khamenei they are Shia Muslims. They play the oppressed card and use Islam as a tool for power. Mamdani's mother was partying with Bill Clinton and Jeff Bezos at Epstein place in 2009. He has been groomed to seize power behind this façade of a grassroots pro-Palestine Muslim. And just like in Iran the enablers which I call traitors are the Democrats and the corrupt elite in academia and media. So Americans please do not be naive. Do not hand your freedom to these enemies of life. Protect what you have unapologetically and fiercely. Otherwise you will have to fight to get it back just like Iranians are still fighting today. Do not think it will not happen to you. It will if you do not stand up now. Choose freedom. Do not give in to their lies. Choose dogs. Be like Congressman Randy Fine not Jake Tapper 🦅 . Share if this wakes you up. From an Iranian who lived it.

Ida Turan 🇮🇷

128,007 views • 6 months ago

The dictator Khomeini in Iran on May 17th 2025 …rejecting Trump’s diplomacy and deals, while inciting chants of: “Death to America” “Death to England” “Death to Israel” And people think that Israel should just sit around, waiting for Iran to develop its weapons, so it can be nuked? 🤣 In the 6 waves of strikes so far, Israel has destroyed enough material for Iran to have made NINE nuclear bombs. Iran have been threatening Israel and the west for about 45 years, and they fund the main Islamic terror proxy organisations that have killed THOUSANDS of people in the Middle East and around the world. The Khomeini regime was installed in 1979 by means of an ISLAMO-MARXIST alliance (like what is happening in the west now with pro-Palestine and the left) …after which the Marxist co-conspirators were rounded up and EXECUTED by the fundamentalist Islamic regime. Women’s and minority rights literally disappeared, enforced by the sharia police. Many thousands dissidents (including women protesting the Hijab) have been arrested and killed. In recent surveys of Iranian citizens, 80-90% REJECT the IRGC regime, and only 40% identify as Muslims. The branch of Shia Islam called ‘Twelver Shia’ is the official state enforced religion in Iran, and is characterised by its belief in twelve divinely appointed Imams, with the twelfth Imam currently in occultation. Twelvers believe that the twelfth Imam, Muhammad al-Mahdi, is currently in a state of occultation and will reappear as the Mahdi at the end of time (the destruction of Israel) to establish justice on Earth. So, destroying Israel is actually a religious duty, and a means of hastening the reappearance of the twelfth Imam Mahdi. Many Iranians who lived in or remember the Pahlavi dynasty stand proudly WITH Israel, and you can often see the Iranian and Israeli flags being FLOWN TOGETHER at anti-antisemitism rallies and counter protests to the pro-Palestine / Hamas rallies. Iranians want their country back, and Iranians living in Australia SUPPORT Israel. The utter ignorance of history and the lack of knowledge you display is only matched by your ramblings about ‘The Deep State’ and your arrogant labelling of ANYONE as a Zionist SHILL (not shrill) who DARES to pull you up on your factual falsehoods and polyfilled narratives. You clearly cannot admit that you are ever WRONG, and you clearly cannot admit that you have drifted into topics and areas that are OUT OF YOUR DEPTH. This is not the attitude and behaviour of a party leader, or a statesman, or even of a conservative. It is an attitude and behaviour more resembling someone from the LOONY LEFT. Many people used to LIKE you Gerard (myself included), but on this hill you are leaking more morally intact, informed, rational followers than you care to know or admit.

The dictator Khomeini in Iran on May 17th 2025 …rejecting Trump’s diplomacy and deals, while inciting chants of: “Death to America” “Death to England” “Death to Israel” And people think that Israel should just sit around, waiting for Iran to develop its weapons, so it can be nuked? 🤣 In the 6 waves of strikes so far, Israel has destroyed enough material for Iran to have made NINE nuclear bombs. Iran have been threatening Israel and the west for about 45 years, and they fund the main Islamic terror proxy organisations that have killed THOUSANDS of people in the Middle East and around the world. The Khomeini regime was installed in 1979 by means of an ISLAMO-MARXIST alliance (like what is happening in the west now with pro-Palestine and the left) …after which the Marxist co-conspirators were rounded up and EXECUTED by the fundamentalist Islamic regime. Women’s and minority rights literally disappeared, enforced by the sharia police. Many thousands dissidents (including women protesting the Hijab) have been arrested and killed. In recent surveys of Iranian citizens, 80-90% REJECT the IRGC regime, and only 40% identify as Muslims. The branch of Shia Islam called ‘Twelver Shia’ is the official state enforced religion in Iran, and is characterised by its belief in twelve divinely appointed Imams, with the twelfth Imam currently in occultation. Twelvers believe that the twelfth Imam, Muhammad al-Mahdi, is currently in a state of occultation and will reappear as the Mahdi at the end of time (the destruction of Israel) to establish justice on Earth. So, destroying Israel is actually a religious duty, and a means of hastening the reappearance of the twelfth Imam Mahdi. Many Iranians who lived in or remember the Pahlavi dynasty stand proudly WITH Israel, and you can often see the Iranian and Israeli flags being FLOWN TOGETHER at anti-antisemitism rallies and counter protests to the pro-Palestine / Hamas rallies. Iranians want their country back, and Iranians living in Australia SUPPORT Israel. The utter ignorance of history and the lack of knowledge you display is only matched by your ramblings about ‘The Deep State’ and your arrogant labelling of ANYONE as a Zionist SHILL (not shrill) who DARES to pull you up on your factual falsehoods and polyfilled narratives. You clearly cannot admit that you are ever WRONG, and you clearly cannot admit that you have drifted into topics and areas that are OUT OF YOUR DEPTH. This is not the attitude and behaviour of a party leader, or a statesman, or even of a conservative. It is an attitude and behaviour more resembling someone from the LOONY LEFT. Many people used to LIKE you Gerard (myself included), but on this hill you are leaking more morally intact, informed, rational followers than you care to know or admit.

Mark Rowley

11,604 views • 1 year ago

Yesterday, I had the honor of speaking before thousands of Iranians and Iranian-Americans at the National Mall in Washington, D.C., in front of the Capitol.🇺🇸 I stood there to be the voice of students living in darkness under a total internet blackout. We will not let their voices be silenced. Thanks to the incredible organizers, especially Salar Gholami, for bringing us together and giving us the chance to be a voice for the voiceless 🇮🇷 Here was my speech: First, thank you America for giving us a voice while the regime in Iran has been trying to silence our voices for the past 47 years. I stand before you today as a small member of the Iranian Community I am one of thousands of students from Aryamehr University who should have been building our future in our own homeland, but were pushed out by a system that fears educated, free-thinking minds. I left Iran because an oppressive regime made it impossible to live there with dignity, freedom, and hope. I was one of the lucky ones to get a chance to live in the free world and experience real freedom in the United States. But today, I speak for the students sitting in darkness under a total internet blackout, cut off from the world as the regime tries to silence them. I speak for those who have been jailed, beaten, and threatened. For those who, even with their lives on the line, still choose to stand up. They told us: If you don’t like it, leave. So many of us did. And now, across the world, we have become their nightmare. They shut down the internet to isolate our people. They censor, surveil, and punish to keep the truth hidden. But they cannot silence millions of Iranians beyond their borders. For 47 years, this regime has tried to erase our identity. To suppress our voices. To control our lives, our culture, even our thoughts. But they have failed. They have failed because Iran is not the regime. Iran is its people. Iran is its students, its women and men, its workers, a generation that continues to rise, even when facing bullets, prison, and darkness. And no force on earth can stop a people who have decided to rise. To the leaders of the free world, I say this: Listen to the voices of the Iranian people. Stand with those who are risking everything for the same values you claim to defend. Because this is not just the Iranians’ fight. This is a fight between civilization and barbarity. This is a fight for freedom. For dignity. For the right of a nation to live without oppression. And as long as even one of us remains, inside Iran or in exile, this fight will continue. We did not leave Iran behind. We carry it with us. And one day, We will take our country back and return to a free Iran. Long live Iran, God bless the United States of America, Javid Shah.

Yesterday, I had the honor of speaking before thousands of Iranians and Iranian-Americans at the National Mall in Washington, D.C., in front of the Capitol.🇺🇸 I stood there to be the voice of students living in darkness under a total internet blackout. We will not let their voices be silenced. Thanks to the incredible organizers, especially Salar Gholami, for bringing us together and giving us the chance to be a voice for the voiceless 🇮🇷 Here was my speech: First, thank you America for giving us a voice while the regime in Iran has been trying to silence our voices for the past 47 years. I stand before you today as a small member of the Iranian Community I am one of thousands of students from Aryamehr University who should have been building our future in our own homeland, but were pushed out by a system that fears educated, free-thinking minds. I left Iran because an oppressive regime made it impossible to live there with dignity, freedom, and hope. I was one of the lucky ones to get a chance to live in the free world and experience real freedom in the United States. But today, I speak for the students sitting in darkness under a total internet blackout, cut off from the world as the regime tries to silence them. I speak for those who have been jailed, beaten, and threatened. For those who, even with their lives on the line, still choose to stand up. They told us: If you don’t like it, leave. So many of us did. And now, across the world, we have become their nightmare. They shut down the internet to isolate our people. They censor, surveil, and punish to keep the truth hidden. But they cannot silence millions of Iranians beyond their borders. For 47 years, this regime has tried to erase our identity. To suppress our voices. To control our lives, our culture, even our thoughts. But they have failed. They have failed because Iran is not the regime. Iran is its people. Iran is its students, its women and men, its workers, a generation that continues to rise, even when facing bullets, prison, and darkness. And no force on earth can stop a people who have decided to rise. To the leaders of the free world, I say this: Listen to the voices of the Iranian people. Stand with those who are risking everything for the same values you claim to defend. Because this is not just the Iranians’ fight. This is a fight between civilization and barbarity. This is a fight for freedom. For dignity. For the right of a nation to live without oppression. And as long as even one of us remains, inside Iran or in exile, this fight will continue. We did not leave Iran behind. We carry it with us. And one day, We will take our country back and return to a free Iran. Long live Iran, God bless the United States of America, Javid Shah.

Sana Ebrahimi Ledene

18,300 views • 4 months ago

Protests are spreading rapidly across both small towns and major cities in Iran. The slogans echoing through the streets speak of one thing only: love for Iran. The Iranian people have never accepted—and never will accept—being reduced to an abstract “Muslim ummah” under a coercive regime that seeks to erase their national identity. Iranian patriotism stands firm against a government that has tried, unsuccessfully, to redefine a nation with a civilization thousands of years old. While the Islamic Republic has spent Iran’s oil and gas wealth on terrorist groups such as Hamas and Hezbollah, the Iranian people respond with a clear and powerful cry: “Neither Gaza nor Lebanon — my life for Iran.” Another widely chanted slogan, “This is the final battle; Pahlavi will return,” is born from the same deep love for the homeland. For many Iranians, the Pahlavi name symbolizes national security, dignity, and a strong sense of national pride. Iranians have only one identity: Iranian. They were never an “Islamic ummah,” and they will never embrace terrorists who kill innocent people in the name of ideology. The world must understand this: when Iran is free, and a secular democratic government comes to power, political Islam will begin to lose its influence far beyond Iran’s borders. Just as Khomeini once taught radicalization to the so-called “Muslim ummah,” a free Iran—at the heart of the Middle East—will lead the way in dismantling this dark ideology worldwide. The international community must support the Iranian people’s revolution. A free Iran means a safer Middle East—and for Europe, Iran’s neighbor, it means trade, stability, and legitimate energy partnerships instead of terrorism, chaos, and endless crises. I share with you some images of Iran during the Pahlavi dynasty to help you understand what the future of a free and prosperous Iran can look like. #پاينده_ایران #جاويدشاه‌

Protests are spreading rapidly across both small towns and major cities in Iran. The slogans echoing through the streets speak of one thing only: love for Iran. The Iranian people have never accepted—and never will accept—being reduced to an abstract “Muslim ummah” under a coercive regime that seeks to erase their national identity. Iranian patriotism stands firm against a government that has tried, unsuccessfully, to redefine a nation with a civilization thousands of years old. While the Islamic Republic has spent Iran’s oil and gas wealth on terrorist groups such as Hamas and Hezbollah, the Iranian people respond with a clear and powerful cry: “Neither Gaza nor Lebanon — my life for Iran.” Another widely chanted slogan, “This is the final battle; Pahlavi will return,” is born from the same deep love for the homeland. For many Iranians, the Pahlavi name symbolizes national security, dignity, and a strong sense of national pride. Iranians have only one identity: Iranian. They were never an “Islamic ummah,” and they will never embrace terrorists who kill innocent people in the name of ideology. The world must understand this: when Iran is free, and a secular democratic government comes to power, political Islam will begin to lose its influence far beyond Iran’s borders. Just as Khomeini once taught radicalization to the so-called “Muslim ummah,” a free Iran—at the heart of the Middle East—will lead the way in dismantling this dark ideology worldwide. The international community must support the Iranian people’s revolution. A free Iran means a safer Middle East—and for Europe, Iran’s neighbor, it means trade, stability, and legitimate energy partnerships instead of terrorism, chaos, and endless crises. I share with you some images of Iran during the Pahlavi dynasty to help you understand what the future of a free and prosperous Iran can look like. #پاينده_ایران #جاويدشاه‌

Darya Safai MP

29,039 views • 7 months ago