Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

🇮🇷 EMERGENCY INTERVIEW: U.S. TO STRIKE IRAN - WHAT COMES NEXT It’s almost definite now, Trump is planning to strike Iran. The only question is: What’s his objective? Is it a complete regime change, or a Venezuela-like goal to replace the Supreme Leader with a more lenient member of...

MarioNawfal's profile picture

Mario Nawfal

3,566,423 subscribers

3,979,356 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Who is Reza Pahlavi, the son of the last king of Iran, who wants to lead the country during its transition period after the U.S. and Israel killed the leader of its Islamic regime, Ayatollah Ali Khameini. Pahlavi's family was forced from power in 1979 by Iran's revolution and has lived in exile since then, mainly in the U.S., and has never returned to Iran. Khameinei's death has not brought the regime to an end, so far. But if it does eventually fall, Reza Pahlavi is hoping for a chance to take over. #iran
2:59

Who is Reza Pahlavi, the son of the last king of Iran, who wants to lead the country during its transition period after the U.S. and Israel killed the leader of its Islamic regime, Ayatollah Ali Khameini. Pahlavi's family was forced from power in 1979 by Iran's revolution and has lived in exile since then, mainly in the U.S., and has never returned to Iran. Khameinei's death has not brought the regime to an end, so far. But if it does eventually fall, Reza Pahlavi is hoping for a chance to take over. #iran

CBS News

89,191 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

🇮🇷 "THE REGIME SURVIVES NOT BECAUSE OF LEGITIMACY, BUT BECAUSE OF SHEER INTIMIDATION AND TERROR" Reza Pahlavi is the exiled crown prince of Iran and a leading figure in the opposition to the Islamic Republic of Iran. He breaks down how Iran went from one of the fastest-growing, Western-aligned countries in the world, with close ties to the U.S., France, UK, and even Israel, to a brutal theocracy ruled by fear, militias, and repression. "Iran was not only growing faster than the superpowers back then… it was allies with the West, including West Germany, and even allied with Israel. Khomeini stepped in claiming to be the sole representative of God on Earth. He cut off other clerics from power and funding, and imposed a religious dictatorship. They created the IRGC [Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps] to protect the regime, not the country, and it became a mafia. The regime survives not because of legitimacy, but because of sheer intimidation and terror. If the free world keeps appeasing the regime, change in Iran will never happen." Reza Pahlavi
6:22

🇮🇷 "THE REGIME SURVIVES NOT BECAUSE OF LEGITIMACY, BUT BECAUSE OF SHEER INTIMIDATION AND TERROR" Reza Pahlavi is the exiled crown prince of Iran and a leading figure in the opposition to the Islamic Republic of Iran. He breaks down how Iran went from one of the fastest-growing, Western-aligned countries in the world, with close ties to the U.S., France, UK, and even Israel, to a brutal theocracy ruled by fear, militias, and repression. "Iran was not only growing faster than the superpowers back then… it was allies with the West, including West Germany, and even allied with Israel. Khomeini stepped in claiming to be the sole representative of God on Earth. He cut off other clerics from power and funding, and imposed a religious dictatorship. They created the IRGC [Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps] to protect the regime, not the country, and it became a mafia. The regime survives not because of legitimacy, but because of sheer intimidation and terror. If the free world keeps appeasing the regime, change in Iran will never happen." Reza Pahlavi

Mario Nawfal

43,784 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Iran’s Nightmare Scenario: The Civil War That Could Topple the Regime. Iran’s Regime Change Scenario Has Begun And It Starts With the Kurds. While the world focuses on U.S. and Israeli attacks on Iranian military targets, a new front may be opening inside Iran itself — the Kurdish front. The Kurds are the largest stateless nation in the world, with around 10 million living inside Iran’s western provinces. Historically oppressed and repeatedly targeted by the Iranian regime, Kurdish armed groups could become a major internal challenge to Tehran. In this video, I explain why the Kurdish factor could dramatically change the strategic equation in Iran. Airstrikes can weaken a regime, but history shows that real regime collapse usually comes from internal pressure. If Kurdish forces launch a ground offensive while Iran is weakened militarily, it could trigger a chain reaction across the country.
13:19

Iran’s Nightmare Scenario: The Civil War That Could Topple the Regime. Iran’s Regime Change Scenario Has Begun And It Starts With the Kurds. While the world focuses on U.S. and Israeli attacks on Iranian military targets, a new front may be opening inside Iran itself — the Kurdish front. The Kurds are the largest stateless nation in the world, with around 10 million living inside Iran’s western provinces. Historically oppressed and repeatedly targeted by the Iranian regime, Kurdish armed groups could become a major internal challenge to Tehran. In this video, I explain why the Kurdish factor could dramatically change the strategic equation in Iran. Airstrikes can weaken a regime, but history shows that real regime collapse usually comes from internal pressure. If Kurdish forces launch a ground offensive while Iran is weakened militarily, it could trigger a chain reaction across the country.

Ken Cao-The China Crash Chronicle

22,884 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Are U.S. and Israeli goals in Iran diverging? “For Israel, Iran is a regional adversary… and they want Iran to collapse… But Iran’s collapse is not in America’s interest. We did have an interest in Iran not developing a nuclear weapon, but we could have achieved that diplomatically… So I think that there is a divergence of interest between Israel and the U.S.” The American Conservative senior editor Andrew Day argues the United States’ and Israel’s interests in Iran are diverging, as Israel seeks regime collapse while the U.S. prefers stability and cooperation. Watch The Matt Gaetz Show on YouTube TV Today!
2:09

Are U.S. and Israeli goals in Iran diverging? “For Israel, Iran is a regional adversary… and they want Iran to collapse… But Iran’s collapse is not in America’s interest. We did have an interest in Iran not developing a nuclear weapon, but we could have achieved that diplomatically… So I think that there is a divergence of interest between Israel and the U.S.” The American Conservative senior editor Andrew Day argues the United States’ and Israel’s interests in Iran are diverging, as Israel seeks regime collapse while the U.S. prefers stability and cooperation. Watch The Matt Gaetz Show on YouTube TV Today!

One America News

22,300 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Regime change is not our decision. We learned that the hard way in Iraq and Afghanistan - I fought in both of those wars. We ended up there for a long time in a war we didn’t understand. Regime change can only come from one place: the people of Iran. But let’s be clear - we may not be at war with Iran, but they are at war with us. I support Israel’s strikes fully and hope they are successful in debilitating Iran’s military.
1:07

Regime change is not our decision. We learned that the hard way in Iraq and Afghanistan - I fought in both of those wars. We ended up there for a long time in a war we didn’t understand. Regime change can only come from one place: the people of Iran. But let’s be clear - we may not be at war with Iran, but they are at war with us. I support Israel’s strikes fully and hope they are successful in debilitating Iran’s military.

Tim Sheehy

222,751 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🇮🇷🇮🇱 "ISRAEL KNOWS THE REAL THREAT ISN’T IRAN’S BOMBS, IT’S THE REGIME ITSELF" Reza Pahlavi, former crown prince of Iran and leading voice for regime change, says Israel understands the difference between the people of Iran and the system that rules over them. And it’s betting on the people. He says if the world helps speed up internal change, the need for military intervention disappears. So does the threat. "Israel’s leadership talks to the Iranian people directly. That’s not a coincidence. The regime is more afraid of its own people than it is of Israel. The nuclear issue is only part of it, their missile program can already reach Europe. If change comes fast, we won’t need to talk about strikes or timelines. As long as this regime exists, every scenario has to stay on the table. The best way to stop the threat is to end the regime from within." Reza Pahlavi
3:53

🇮🇷🇮🇱 "ISRAEL KNOWS THE REAL THREAT ISN’T IRAN’S BOMBS, IT’S THE REGIME ITSELF" Reza Pahlavi, former crown prince of Iran and leading voice for regime change, says Israel understands the difference between the people of Iran and the system that rules over them. And it’s betting on the people. He says if the world helps speed up internal change, the need for military intervention disappears. So does the threat. "Israel’s leadership talks to the Iranian people directly. That’s not a coincidence. The regime is more afraid of its own people than it is of Israel. The nuclear issue is only part of it, their missile program can already reach Europe. If change comes fast, we won’t need to talk about strikes or timelines. As long as this regime exists, every scenario has to stay on the table. The best way to stop the threat is to end the regime from within." Reza Pahlavi

Mario Nawfal

36,352 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

The last time an American administration actively worked to replace a regime in the Middle East was at Iran’s back door. In 2003, the U.S. invasion of Iraq ended with the arrest—and eventual hanging—of Saddam Hussein. Absurdly, that war helped Iran twice over. First, the West, in what can only be described in hindsight as strategic folly, eliminated Tehran’s most dangerous regional enemy—one that had been draining Iran’s blood, money, and resources for decades. Freed from that pressure, Iran could refocus its full attention on confronting what it calls the “little devil” and the “big devil.” Second, the chaos and trauma unleashed by regime change in Iraq turned the very concept into a taboo. How far off the agenda is it? Just last Tuesday—in the press conference with Benjamin Netanyahu—Donald Trump explicitly said that regime change in Iran is not the objective. But was that statement genuine—or misdirection? Iran did not take Trump seriously when he gave it 60 days to negotiate, warning that on day 61 Israel would strike and destroy Iran’s nuclear facilities. They ignored that warning. Yesterday, Trump issued another warning: if the regime kills protesters, the United States will respond. The regime did not listen. Protesters were killed. The question now is whether Iran will listen the third time. If it does, we may be witnessing the early stages of a historic shift in the Middle East. Trump has referenced Iran twice in this context—and in both cases, his words were backed by action: the strike at Fordow and the elimination of Qassem Soleimani. Trump is signalling. I believe there is a clear link between the attempted change of government in Venezuela and the possibility of change in Tehran. Let it be so.
1:30

The last time an American administration actively worked to replace a regime in the Middle East was at Iran’s back door. In 2003, the U.S. invasion of Iraq ended with the arrest—and eventual hanging—of Saddam Hussein. Absurdly, that war helped Iran twice over. First, the West, in what can only be described in hindsight as strategic folly, eliminated Tehran’s most dangerous regional enemy—one that had been draining Iran’s blood, money, and resources for decades. Freed from that pressure, Iran could refocus its full attention on confronting what it calls the “little devil” and the “big devil.” Second, the chaos and trauma unleashed by regime change in Iraq turned the very concept into a taboo. How far off the agenda is it? Just last Tuesday—in the press conference with Benjamin Netanyahu—Donald Trump explicitly said that regime change in Iran is not the objective. But was that statement genuine—or misdirection? Iran did not take Trump seriously when he gave it 60 days to negotiate, warning that on day 61 Israel would strike and destroy Iran’s nuclear facilities. They ignored that warning. Yesterday, Trump issued another warning: if the regime kills protesters, the United States will respond. The regime did not listen. Protesters were killed. The question now is whether Iran will listen the third time. If it does, we may be witnessing the early stages of a historic shift in the Middle East. Trump has referenced Iran twice in this context—and in both cases, his words were backed by action: the strike at Fordow and the elimination of Qassem Soleimani. Trump is signalling. I believe there is a clear link between the attempted change of government in Venezuela and the possibility of change in Tehran. Let it be so.

Amit Segal

17,445 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

🇮🇱Israeli opposition vows to restart war with Iran if elected “The countdown to regime change in Iran will begin once there is a change of government in Israel,” former Israeli PM and opposition leader Naftali Bennett declared. Bennett and his political allies have repeatedly criticized Netanyahu for supposedly not being decisive enough in dealing with Iran, Hezbollah, and Hamas. The former Israeli PM has also argued that the Israel needs to adopt a more aggressive stance towards Turkey, whom he deemed has “the new Iran.”
0:39

🇮🇱Israeli opposition vows to restart war with Iran if elected “The countdown to regime change in Iran will begin once there is a change of government in Israel,” former Israeli PM and opposition leader Naftali Bennett declared. Bennett and his political allies have repeatedly criticized Netanyahu for supposedly not being decisive enough in dealing with Iran, Hezbollah, and Hamas. The former Israeli PM has also argued that the Israel needs to adopt a more aggressive stance towards Turkey, whom he deemed has “the new Iran.”

S p r i n t e r

42,368 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

I spoke today with Bianna Golodryga and Dan Senor about where this war may be heading. There’s a clear divergence in war aims: the U.S. is careful not to commit to regime change, while Israel is formally pushing in that direction. Change in Iran is already underway- the supreme leader and much of the leadership are gone. The real question is what kind of change. If the regime survives, it may emerge even more radical. That’s one reason Israel will push to keep degrading Iran’s capabilities- until Washington draws the line. CNN Breaking News
10:12

I spoke today with Bianna Golodryga and Dan Senor about where this war may be heading. There’s a clear divergence in war aims: the U.S. is careful not to commit to regime change, while Israel is formally pushing in that direction. Change in Iran is already underway- the supreme leader and much of the leadership are gone. The real question is what kind of change. If the regime survives, it may emerge even more radical. That’s one reason Israel will push to keep degrading Iran’s capabilities- until Washington draws the line. CNN Breaking News

נדב איל Nadav Eyal

49,546 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

🚨🇮🇷EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW: THE PRINCE OF IRAN VS. THE REGIME THAT DESTROYED HIS COUNTRY Before 1979, Iran was booming—one of the world’s fastest-growing economies, a U.S. ally, and a rising global power. Women had rights. The military was elite. The country was on track to become the Japan of the Middle East. Then, the revolution happened. Radical clerics seized power. The economy collapsed. Freedom vanished. Iran became a global pariah—funding terror, oppressing its people, and sinking into endless conflict. Now, after 45 years, the regime is weaker than ever. Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi (Reza Pahlavi) reveals how Iran fell, and what it will take to finally bring down the Islamic Republic—before it’s too late. 02:08 – What was Iran really like before 1979? A nation on the rise, with a future that never came. 06:09 – How Iran went from a U.S. ally to one of the West’s greatest adversaries. 10:27 – "Iran should have been the South Korea of the Middle East—now it’s the North Korea." 12:32 – How did the country turn from a secular powerhouse into a theocratic dictatorship? 17:28 – "Why does the West still appease this regime? It has never worked." 19:06 – Did the Shah make fatal mistakes? Could history have taken a different path? 26:42 – Why have Iran’s protest movements failed? The key missing piece. 28:58 – The Iranian people are rediscovering their national identity—and the regime is terrified. 32:44 – Could a foreign power intervene? Should they? Who stands to gain? 36:06 – What would outside intervention look like? How far would it go? 40:16 – Could Iran strike a game-changing deal with the U.S. like Ukraine did? 49:43 – Has Reza Pahlavi had secret discussions about foreign support for Iranian protests? 57:03 – Why a free Iran wouldn’t just change the Middle East—it would change the world. 1:01:09 – Has Reza Pahlavi spoken to Russia and China about their support for the regime? 1:03:27 – If the U.S. and Russia become allies again, what does that mean for Iran? 1:06:14 – "This regime has devastated not just Iran, but the entire region." 1:09:54 – If the people wanted him to lead, would Reza Pahlavi step up? 1:13:25 – How close are Israel and Iran to all-out war? Is it inevitable? 1:20:56 – What does Reza Pahlavi think about Israel’s influence on global politics? 1:23:42 – If Pahlavi could sit with Trump and Putin, what would he tell them about Iran’s future?
1:27:19

🚨🇮🇷EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW: THE PRINCE OF IRAN VS. THE REGIME THAT DESTROYED HIS COUNTRY Before 1979, Iran was booming—one of the world’s fastest-growing economies, a U.S. ally, and a rising global power. Women had rights. The military was elite. The country was on track to become the Japan of the Middle East. Then, the revolution happened. Radical clerics seized power. The economy collapsed. Freedom vanished. Iran became a global pariah—funding terror, oppressing its people, and sinking into endless conflict. Now, after 45 years, the regime is weaker than ever. Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi (Reza Pahlavi) reveals how Iran fell, and what it will take to finally bring down the Islamic Republic—before it’s too late. 02:08 – What was Iran really like before 1979? A nation on the rise, with a future that never came. 06:09 – How Iran went from a U.S. ally to one of the West’s greatest adversaries. 10:27 – "Iran should have been the South Korea of the Middle East—now it’s the North Korea." 12:32 – How did the country turn from a secular powerhouse into a theocratic dictatorship? 17:28 – "Why does the West still appease this regime? It has never worked." 19:06 – Did the Shah make fatal mistakes? Could history have taken a different path? 26:42 – Why have Iran’s protest movements failed? The key missing piece. 28:58 – The Iranian people are rediscovering their national identity—and the regime is terrified. 32:44 – Could a foreign power intervene? Should they? Who stands to gain? 36:06 – What would outside intervention look like? How far would it go? 40:16 – Could Iran strike a game-changing deal with the U.S. like Ukraine did? 49:43 – Has Reza Pahlavi had secret discussions about foreign support for Iranian protests? 57:03 – Why a free Iran wouldn’t just change the Middle East—it would change the world. 1:01:09 – Has Reza Pahlavi spoken to Russia and China about their support for the regime? 1:03:27 – If the U.S. and Russia become allies again, what does that mean for Iran? 1:06:14 – "This regime has devastated not just Iran, but the entire region." 1:09:54 – If the people wanted him to lead, would Reza Pahlavi step up? 1:13:25 – How close are Israel and Iran to all-out war? Is it inevitable? 1:20:56 – What does Reza Pahlavi think about Israel’s influence on global politics? 1:23:42 – If Pahlavi could sit with Trump and Putin, what would he tell them about Iran’s future?

Mario Nawfal

3,639,544 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Mark Levin admits he is extremely worried about regime change, but not in Iran, in Israel, and admits Benjamin Netanyahu may have overplayed his hand. Levin says the end of his friend Netanyahu could be right around the corner. “Netanyahu has to navigate a lot of waters.” “We could have a situation where the regime in Iran survives.” “I’m worried about that a lot.”
1:10

Mark Levin admits he is extremely worried about regime change, but not in Iran, in Israel, and admits Benjamin Netanyahu may have overplayed his hand. Levin says the end of his friend Netanyahu could be right around the corner. “Netanyahu has to navigate a lot of waters.” “We could have a situation where the regime in Iran survives.” “I’m worried about that a lot.”

Shadow of Ezra

251,598 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Former Israeli ambassador to the United States and Free Press contributor Michael Oren said there “is not much choice” but to support regime change in Iran. Oren, a former member of Israel’s Knesset and founder of the Israel Advocacy Group, argued that Iran would have never agreed to American demands to cease uranium enrichment and stop supporting proxy terror organizations. “That was basically a demand for the Iranian regime to self-destruct,” Oren said. “It is literally what they’re about. It was regime suicide, not regime change.” Critics argue that any significant military or covert action aimed at Iran should require prior approval from Congress under Article 1 of the Constitution which gives Congress the power to declare war, not the president.
2:18

Former Israeli ambassador to the United States and Free Press contributor Michael Oren said there “is not much choice” but to support regime change in Iran. Oren, a former member of Israel’s Knesset and founder of the Israel Advocacy Group, argued that Iran would have never agreed to American demands to cease uranium enrichment and stop supporting proxy terror organizations. “That was basically a demand for the Iranian regime to self-destruct,” Oren said. “It is literally what they’re about. It was regime suicide, not regime change.” Critics argue that any significant military or covert action aimed at Iran should require prior approval from Congress under Article 1 of the Constitution which gives Congress the power to declare war, not the president.

CBS News

30,686 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

🚨🇮🇷 PBD INTERVIEW: WILL TRUMP STRIKE IRAN? WILL THE REGIME FALL? Patrick Bet-David’s family fled Iran when he was a child. He’s been an avid supporter of the previous Shah, and a critic of the current regime However he has reservations of opposition leader Reza Pahlavi, and worries any U.S. strikes on the country could destabilize the region He rightly points out that the real challenge comes after the regime falls. Rebuilding Iran will be brutal, messy, and unforgiving, but avoiding it isn’t an option either. We get into: * Why negotiations with Khamenei’s leadership are a dead end * What a post-regime Iran would realistically look like * How the U.S. could influence outcomes without owning another war * And why the hardest part of Iran’s future starts after the fighting stops 03:03 - Regime's delay tactics: drag out negotiations one more day until the world moves on 04:32 - Prince Reza Pahlavi finally playing offense, meeting key US politicians 05:44 - Criticism of Reza sparks cult-like backlash 07:09 - Trump knows leadership: it’s not about doing everything right, it’s about being strong 08:42 - Trump avoids war but won’t let himself be publicly humiliated 10:18 - Iran isn’t just a threat to Israel 11:45 - Trust Trump’s instincts, even if not every move is perfect 13:02 - Don’t waste time taking out Khamenei 14:27 - 47 years of brainwashing won’t vanish overnight 15:59 - The hate for the Pahlavi name runs deep in Iran 17:23 - Reza can’t rely on foreign generals 18:51 - Why the West once felt safe holding a historic summit in Iran 20:17 - Regime’s brutality started day one 21:46 - Iran needs a strong hand and realism 23:12 - Civil war in Iran could happen regardless of U.S. action 24:34 - Sanctions are the regime’s fault because of their failed diplomacy 26:08 - Iranians are suffering not because of sanctions, but because of corrupt leadership 27:33 - Reza Pahlavi burned too many bridges 29:01 - Mossad is absolutely involved in Iran Patrick Bet-David
40:11

🚨🇮🇷 PBD INTERVIEW: WILL TRUMP STRIKE IRAN? WILL THE REGIME FALL? Patrick Bet-David’s family fled Iran when he was a child. He’s been an avid supporter of the previous Shah, and a critic of the current regime However he has reservations of opposition leader Reza Pahlavi, and worries any U.S. strikes on the country could destabilize the region He rightly points out that the real challenge comes after the regime falls. Rebuilding Iran will be brutal, messy, and unforgiving, but avoiding it isn’t an option either. We get into: * Why negotiations with Khamenei’s leadership are a dead end * What a post-regime Iran would realistically look like * How the U.S. could influence outcomes without owning another war * And why the hardest part of Iran’s future starts after the fighting stops 03:03 - Regime's delay tactics: drag out negotiations one more day until the world moves on 04:32 - Prince Reza Pahlavi finally playing offense, meeting key US politicians 05:44 - Criticism of Reza sparks cult-like backlash 07:09 - Trump knows leadership: it’s not about doing everything right, it’s about being strong 08:42 - Trump avoids war but won’t let himself be publicly humiliated 10:18 - Iran isn’t just a threat to Israel 11:45 - Trust Trump’s instincts, even if not every move is perfect 13:02 - Don’t waste time taking out Khamenei 14:27 - 47 years of brainwashing won’t vanish overnight 15:59 - The hate for the Pahlavi name runs deep in Iran 17:23 - Reza can’t rely on foreign generals 18:51 - Why the West once felt safe holding a historic summit in Iran 20:17 - Regime’s brutality started day one 21:46 - Iran needs a strong hand and realism 23:12 - Civil war in Iran could happen regardless of U.S. action 24:34 - Sanctions are the regime’s fault because of their failed diplomacy 26:08 - Iranians are suffering not because of sanctions, but because of corrupt leadership 27:33 - Reza Pahlavi burned too many bridges 29:01 - Mossad is absolutely involved in Iran Patrick Bet-David

Mario Nawfal

2,028,912 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

🇫🇷 MACRON IS RIGHT: REGIME CHANGE NEVER WORKS - AND IRAN WOULD BE NO DIFFERENT Trump just threatened to join Israel in bombing Iran. It’s not just saber-rattling - it signals yet another U.S. push for regime change. Macron warns: “Anyone who has sought in the past to change regimes through military strikes or operations has made strategic errors.” He’s right - and history proves it. In 1953, the CIA overthrew Iran’s elected leader Mossadegh. It planted the seeds of the 1979 revolution, and the regime we’re dealing with now. In Iraq, Saddam’s removal sparked a civil war and the rise of ISIS. Libya? Gaddafi gone, the country disintegrated. Syria? A devastating proxy war the U.S. helped inflame. Emmanuel Macron said it best: “I believe that peoples are sovereign, that they change their leaders themselves.” A former CIA officer told me: when Bush first said “regime change,” even U.S. intelligence panicked - they knew it would backfire. Iran would be no exception.
0:23

🇫🇷 MACRON IS RIGHT: REGIME CHANGE NEVER WORKS - AND IRAN WOULD BE NO DIFFERENT Trump just threatened to join Israel in bombing Iran. It’s not just saber-rattling - it signals yet another U.S. push for regime change. Macron warns: “Anyone who has sought in the past to change regimes through military strikes or operations has made strategic errors.” He’s right - and history proves it. In 1953, the CIA overthrew Iran’s elected leader Mossadegh. It planted the seeds of the 1979 revolution, and the regime we’re dealing with now. In Iraq, Saddam’s removal sparked a civil war and the rise of ISIS. Libya? Gaddafi gone, the country disintegrated. Syria? A devastating proxy war the U.S. helped inflame. Emmanuel Macron said it best: “I believe that peoples are sovereign, that they change their leaders themselves.” A former CIA officer told me: when Bush first said “regime change,” even U.S. intelligence panicked - they knew it would backfire. Iran would be no exception.

Mario Nawfal

295,641 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🇺🇸🇮🇷 SHOULD THE U.S. STRIKE IRAN? "IF THE GOAL IS WEAKEN THE REGIME AND NEGOTIATE, I'M IN" Patrick Bet-David, an Iranian-American entrepreneur and journalist, shares his opinion on the complex decision of whether the U.S. should strike Iran. He’s critical of the Iranian regime but highlights the risks involved. "If the goal is to completely destroy the regime, I worry about a massive power vacuum and chaos like Libya or Iraq. But if the intention is to weaken the regime and pressure them into negotiation, I could get behind it. I’d be open to pressuring Iran for a peaceful resolution but definitely not a full-scale war. I trust Trump’s instincts on these matters, but the real question is, how do we handle this situation long-term?" Patrick Bet-David
5:40

🇺🇸🇮🇷 SHOULD THE U.S. STRIKE IRAN? "IF THE GOAL IS WEAKEN THE REGIME AND NEGOTIATE, I'M IN" Patrick Bet-David, an Iranian-American entrepreneur and journalist, shares his opinion on the complex decision of whether the U.S. should strike Iran. He’s critical of the Iranian regime but highlights the risks involved. "If the goal is to completely destroy the regime, I worry about a massive power vacuum and chaos like Libya or Iraq. But if the intention is to weaken the regime and pressure them into negotiation, I could get behind it. I’d be open to pressuring Iran for a peaceful resolution but definitely not a full-scale war. I trust Trump’s instincts on these matters, but the real question is, how do we handle this situation long-term?" Patrick Bet-David

Mario Nawfal

27,639 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Massive crowds in every big city: Iranians took to the streets to celebrate the 47th Anniversary of Iran’s Islamic Revolution in 1979, when the Western-backed Shah was finally deposed in a popular uprising. Now the shadow of a US regime change war hangs over not only Iran, but the entire region. Despite a relentless campaign of economic sabotage by Washington designed to impoverish Iranians and overthrow the Iranian government, the Islamic Republic still survives and clearly, still enjoys support from much of Iran’s 93 million people. A regime change war on Iran would be nothing short of an unprecedented disaster, with violence and bloodshed that would dwarf the illegal Iraq War of 2003.
4:01

Massive crowds in every big city: Iranians took to the streets to celebrate the 47th Anniversary of Iran’s Islamic Revolution in 1979, when the Western-backed Shah was finally deposed in a popular uprising. Now the shadow of a US regime change war hangs over not only Iran, but the entire region. Despite a relentless campaign of economic sabotage by Washington designed to impoverish Iranians and overthrow the Iranian government, the Islamic Republic still survives and clearly, still enjoys support from much of Iran’s 93 million people. A regime change war on Iran would be nothing short of an unprecedented disaster, with violence and bloodshed that would dwarf the illegal Iraq War of 2003.

Afshin Rattansi

22,312 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

🇺🇸🇮🇷🇮🇱 INTERVIEW: TRUMP PREPARES FOR WAR WITH IRAN Former Army Colonel Daniel Davis is sounding the alarm: a major U.S. attack on Iran is “virtually certain”, and no one’s paying attention. A few weeks ago, everyone was waiting for airstrikes. Then the headlines moved on. But behind the scenes? Troops, tanks, warplanes, and even Delta Force have been moving into the region. Davis says Trump’s not bluffing. The goal? Not just a symbolic hit, but something much bigger: take out Iran’s leadership, crush their military, and maybe even end the regime altogether. Why risk all this? Daniel Davis Deep Dive says it's not about national security. It’s regime change. Just like Syria. Tear Iran apart, keep it weak, and walk away. The problem? That never ends well. 03:16 - Trump likely delayed Iran strike due to Netanyahu's request for more prep time 04:15 - U.S. may be preparing for a massive regional war, not just limited strikes 05:22 - If Iran sees war as existential, they may abandon self-restraint entirely 06:45 - U.S. bases in the region are less defended than Israel's Iron Dome system 07:58 - Iran likely won’t target Gulf cities—wants to avoid widening the war 09:48 - Could Iran’s Supreme Leader Khamenei be targeted in a decapitation strike? 11:12 - Iran now more prepared than during the 12-day war, no surprise possible 13:24 - Iran's missile production was moved underground and continues actively 15:21 - Delta Force capture mission like in Venezuela? Unlikely and dangerous 17:07 - Houthis and Hezbollah might rise if Iran inflicts serious damage on Israel 18:43 - Could an Iranian military success provoke an Israeli nuclear response? 20:54 - Civil war in Iran post-regime change could be worse than current regime 22:47 - Iran's ethnic diversity and separatist movements make regime change risky 24:30 - Israel may prefer chaos in Iran over a functioning successor regime 27:06 - As the world watches other crises, Ukraine quietly loses more ground 30:52 - Ukraine’s frontline collapse or grinding defeat both seem inevitable 33:45 - Europe is drifting from U.S. leadership, considering talks with Russia 36:17 - Trump might dare Europe over Greenland with a troop deployment bluff 38:09 - Trump’s behavior may be more irrational than strategic/cognitive decline? 40:03 - NATO’s future is crumbling, Europe IS preparing for post-U.S. security 43:31 - No real military or economic reason for U.S. to “take” Greenland 45:00 - Trump likely to escalate further: Iran war, Venezuela unrest, NATO collapse
47:42

🇺🇸🇮🇷🇮🇱 INTERVIEW: TRUMP PREPARES FOR WAR WITH IRAN Former Army Colonel Daniel Davis is sounding the alarm: a major U.S. attack on Iran is “virtually certain”, and no one’s paying attention. A few weeks ago, everyone was waiting for airstrikes. Then the headlines moved on. But behind the scenes? Troops, tanks, warplanes, and even Delta Force have been moving into the region. Davis says Trump’s not bluffing. The goal? Not just a symbolic hit, but something much bigger: take out Iran’s leadership, crush their military, and maybe even end the regime altogether. Why risk all this? Daniel Davis Deep Dive says it's not about national security. It’s regime change. Just like Syria. Tear Iran apart, keep it weak, and walk away. The problem? That never ends well. 03:16 - Trump likely delayed Iran strike due to Netanyahu's request for more prep time 04:15 - U.S. may be preparing for a massive regional war, not just limited strikes 05:22 - If Iran sees war as existential, they may abandon self-restraint entirely 06:45 - U.S. bases in the region are less defended than Israel's Iron Dome system 07:58 - Iran likely won’t target Gulf cities—wants to avoid widening the war 09:48 - Could Iran’s Supreme Leader Khamenei be targeted in a decapitation strike? 11:12 - Iran now more prepared than during the 12-day war, no surprise possible 13:24 - Iran's missile production was moved underground and continues actively 15:21 - Delta Force capture mission like in Venezuela? Unlikely and dangerous 17:07 - Houthis and Hezbollah might rise if Iran inflicts serious damage on Israel 18:43 - Could an Iranian military success provoke an Israeli nuclear response? 20:54 - Civil war in Iran post-regime change could be worse than current regime 22:47 - Iran's ethnic diversity and separatist movements make regime change risky 24:30 - Israel may prefer chaos in Iran over a functioning successor regime 27:06 - As the world watches other crises, Ukraine quietly loses more ground 30:52 - Ukraine’s frontline collapse or grinding defeat both seem inevitable 33:45 - Europe is drifting from U.S. leadership, considering talks with Russia 36:17 - Trump might dare Europe over Greenland with a troop deployment bluff 38:09 - Trump’s behavior may be more irrational than strategic/cognitive decline? 40:03 - NATO’s future is crumbling, Europe IS preparing for post-U.S. security 43:31 - No real military or economic reason for U.S. to “take” Greenland 45:00 - Trump likely to escalate further: Iran war, Venezuela unrest, NATO collapse

Mario Nawfal

1,910,543 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Will There Be Regime Change in Iran or are we moving towards World War 3? ✅ Iran’s Defence Minister Amir Nasirzadeh is reportedly killed in Israeli strikes along with a senior IRGC commander, marking a direct hit on Iran’s top military leadership and sharply escalating tensions. ✅ Saudi Arabia and Qatar are joining the United States against Iran, signalling a broader regional alignment beyond just Israel–Iran tensions. ✅ The countries involved now include the U.S., Israel, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, UAE, Bahrain, Kuwait and Iraq. Power blocs are clearly forming, while Russia and China are closely observing the situation. If the U.S. pushes for regime change like it did in Iraq, it may attempt to remove Iran’s leadership and install a puppet government. That could trigger internal instability and long-term chaos. If Iran responds by expanding attacks or disrupting oil routes like the Strait of Hormuz, global markets will feel the shock. And if major powers such as Russia or China get directly involved, the conflict could grow beyond the region and might convert into world war 3!!!
2:50

Will There Be Regime Change in Iran or are we moving towards World War 3? ✅ Iran’s Defence Minister Amir Nasirzadeh is reportedly killed in Israeli strikes along with a senior IRGC commander, marking a direct hit on Iran’s top military leadership and sharply escalating tensions. ✅ Saudi Arabia and Qatar are joining the United States against Iran, signalling a broader regional alignment beyond just Israel–Iran tensions. ✅ The countries involved now include the U.S., Israel, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, UAE, Bahrain, Kuwait and Iraq. Power blocs are clearly forming, while Russia and China are closely observing the situation. If the U.S. pushes for regime change like it did in Iraq, it may attempt to remove Iran’s leadership and install a puppet government. That could trigger internal instability and long-term chaos. If Iran responds by expanding attacks or disrupting oil routes like the Strait of Hormuz, global markets will feel the shock. And if major powers such as Russia or China get directly involved, the conflict could grow beyond the region and might convert into world war 3!!!

Praffulgarg

34,818 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

🇮🇱🇮🇷 RITTER: “IRAN’S ONLY HOPE IS TO BREAK ISRAEL’S BACK... POLITICALLY” Scott Ritter: "If Iran can repeat this tomorrow, and the next night, and the next... Israel can’t survive that politically. It’ll be the end of the Netanyahu regime. Iran’s goal is not to change Netanyahu’s mind; it’s to collapse his government through domestic pressure and a vote of no confidence. Iran has no choice but to deliver the maximum harm to Israel, but must focus on infrastructure, military, and leadership targets. Not civilians."
3:46

🇮🇱🇮🇷 RITTER: “IRAN’S ONLY HOPE IS TO BREAK ISRAEL’S BACK... POLITICALLY” Scott Ritter: "If Iran can repeat this tomorrow, and the next night, and the next... Israel can’t survive that politically. It’ll be the end of the Netanyahu regime. Iran’s goal is not to change Netanyahu’s mind; it’s to collapse his government through domestic pressure and a vote of no confidence. Iran has no choice but to deliver the maximum harm to Israel, but must focus on infrastructure, military, and leadership targets. Not civilians."

Mario Nawfal

1,222,577 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr