Video wird geladen...
Video konnte nicht geladen werden
Every entrepreneur I know thinks the fundraising process is broken. Why capital formation should be onchain: - It’s more efficient - The process is fairer for both sides - Much more transparency
313,656 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten •via X (Twitter)
34 Kommentare

The only counter I would make is many private companies prefer to keep their own data private (non transparent). Two way street.

Capital formation on a blockchain only makes sense if you choose the right one, where the native token has been distributed fairly and securely since its introduction. Capital formation on a blockchain to which insiders and early investors had access is fraught with uncertainty.

DECENTRALIZED FINANCE.

We know the solution 👀

It's already like this on Bittensor $TAO

I think the listing process on Coinbase is more broken. You list VC backed fartcoins instead fair launch, ethos first protocols that meet ALL of your listing requirements. Focus on fixing coinbase before fixing even bigger problems.

movement on @base

charities should also be onchain 👀

icm coded

Capital formation should be on chain and on a Coinbase product so you can freeze the capital and ask for 100 forms of KYC to release it.

At @mintlayer we have launched our Tokenized Fundraise for Pre Series A, two weeks ago, by tokenizing 5% of our equity. We have the ability to support any startup that would like to do the same.

Transparency and fairness? Sure. Let’s beta-test on $WLUNA… $LUNA = $WLUNA 1:1? After 3 years of silence… #FixWLUNA

Loki this whole thing just screams @0xCapx

it IS onchain on bittensor. whale-deterrent fair launches.

Not only that: 1) how tokens are being handled, SAFT regulation 2) transparency on distribution 3) MMs, Founders, Exchanges tokens holding transparency 4) legal enforcement if anyone is breaking things.

There are currently about $600 million on chain funding 128 startups building on @bittensor through Bitcoin style emission. Fully market driven from day one. But you won't mention it because you want VC control. $TAO

@jessepollak $tibbir 🐸

Gribbit 🐸🐸🐸

What are your thoughts on on-chain being used to raise money for charity through tax tokens?

onchain pay $Boo

ICOs are so back! 🤪 thank you for your efforts lobbying Mr Brian

From the man who has never posted an accurate POR.

$tibbir about to open a blackhole for these types of things

Every CEO, except you, does right by their customers and doesnt scam them. $wluna

You’ve just described Bittensor $TAO

Ah yes, the ‘efficient’ process where 12 VCs ghost you after asking for your deck in 7 formats.

@brian_armstrong you can add to that the fact that it's more accessible to both founders and investors

Based

👀

Several questions What happened to Bitcoin Cash? What do you think about Roger Ver? There is a lack of criticism from You can appeal about what happened to the block size.

Brian's baldhead is just so mesmerizing to stare at

we built decentralized money before we built decentralized funding. feels backwards.

Eventually, the entire world will be tokenized. This is just the beginning.

This is only way. Captables onchain is such an obvious thing that it’s weird that we have had Bitcoin known to the general public since 2011, but done nothing about this. I kick myself for being this stupid.


