Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Everyone overcomplicates apps That’s exactly why they don’t win It’s actually much simpler than people think Like Alex Nguyen says: Use AI to solve a real problem faster then wrap that solution in a B2C app That’s it People want to pay They’re just not paying you because there’s... show more

Jah Mills

6,052 subscribers

25,723 views • 8 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

personal brand is more than followers - it’s trust when you like someone for who they are, you naturally root for them. you buy their products, recommend them and even defend them at times. when I think of testimonials, I don’t just think about a product - I think of he’s kind, helpful, real. a father like me and someone you just like. and that’s the power of a personal brand - it becomes your moat people buy from people they trust, not faceless logos. if you’re a founder, real leverage isn’t just building products - it’s being someone others actually want to see win. that’s real distribution

Tibo

16,055 views • 10 months ago

If you’re not using AI to build apps, you’re not going to make it The real question isn’t “Should I use AI?” It’s: → which model → and how you use it Using + Opus 4.5, I’ve been building Flow State with just a few prompts Almost ready for App Store approval Update #3 below Built entirely on my iPhone from a hot tub in Miami And every time I got distracted, Rork pulled me back with a notification Building has changed forever Don’t be like those business that never adapted to the internet and were forced to close their doors

If you’re not using AI to build apps, you’re not going to make it The real question isn’t “Should I use AI?” It’s: → which model → and how you use it Using + Opus 4.5, I’ve been building Flow State with just a few prompts Almost ready for App Store approval Update #3 below Built entirely on my iPhone from a hot tub in Miami And every time I got distracted, Rork pulled me back with a notification Building has changed forever Don’t be like those business that never adapted to the internet and were forced to close their doors

Jah Jiren

31,802 views • 8 months ago

Google just gave away the real secret to showing up in AI answers. And honestly, it contradicts a lot of the viral vidoes you’ve been watching. Because Google basically said: stop obsessing over tricks like llms.txt, PerfectSchema, and all these technical hacks people are trying to sell you. That’s not what gets you cited. Here’s what does. AI doesn’t need to cite generic content. If your article says the same thing as everyone else, the AI can answer the question without you. But if your content has something original. A real test, a number you measured, a customer insight, a process you actually use, now the AI has a reason to reference you. That’s the difference between commodity content and non-commodity content. But here’s where most people get stuck. They don’t know what to create first. That’s why tools like AnswerThePublic are useful. You can see the real questions people are already asking around your topic, then use those questions as the starting point. But don’t just answer them generically. Add something only you know. Your data. Your experience. Your customer conversations. Your examples. Because in the AI era, the goal isn’t just to write content. It’s to become the source AI wants to cite.

Google just gave away the real secret to showing up in AI answers. And honestly, it contradicts a lot of the viral vidoes you’ve been watching. Because Google basically said: stop obsessing over tricks like llms.txt, PerfectSchema, and all these technical hacks people are trying to sell you. That’s not what gets you cited. Here’s what does. AI doesn’t need to cite generic content. If your article says the same thing as everyone else, the AI can answer the question without you. But if your content has something original. A real test, a number you measured, a customer insight, a process you actually use, now the AI has a reason to reference you. That’s the difference between commodity content and non-commodity content. But here’s where most people get stuck. They don’t know what to create first. That’s why tools like AnswerThePublic are useful. You can see the real questions people are already asking around your topic, then use those questions as the starting point. But don’t just answer them generically. Add something only you know. Your data. Your experience. Your customer conversations. Your examples. Because in the AI era, the goal isn’t just to write content. It’s to become the source AI wants to cite.

Neil Patel

16,728 views • 1 month ago

Q: How will I know when it’s the right time to go full-time on a startup idea? Tony Fadell is the co-creator of the iPod, iPhone, and Nest. As he puts it in the clip below: “Great ideas chase you.” He continues: “In this world, there are so many people who have more ideas than they have time to implement… I used to be like that. But the best ideas are the ones that you can really focus on… Now I try to run away from a great idea. And then it stalks me. It hunts you down because you’re like: ‘Ah, that’s going to have this problem, I’m going to put it aside.’ And then a few days later, you’re like: ‘Actually I think I know how to solve that problem.’ At some point it just becomes this black hole that sucks you in and you can’t think about anything else but this.” Mark Zuckerberg gave similar advice in a previous Startup Archive answer: “I always think the most important thing entrepreneurs should do is pick something they care about and work on it, but don’t actually commit to turning it into a company until it’s working. If you look at the data of the very best companies, I think a tremendous percentage of them have been built that way and not from people who decided upfront that they wanted to start a company because you just get locked into a local maxima a lot of the time.” Let great ideas chase you and don’t turn it into a company until it’s working. There’s almost always a ton of work you you can do upfront to de-risk an idea before turning it into a company. And perhaps just as important: you want to make sure you’re still excited about the idea after a few months and the novelty has worn off—it should be all you can think about. Companies are almost always a 10 year project if they work and a 2-3 year project if they fail. It’s worth it to be patient before jumping in with two feet.

Q: How will I know when it’s the right time to go full-time on a startup idea? Tony Fadell is the co-creator of the iPod, iPhone, and Nest. As he puts it in the clip below: “Great ideas chase you.” He continues: “In this world, there are so many people who have more ideas than they have time to implement… I used to be like that. But the best ideas are the ones that you can really focus on… Now I try to run away from a great idea. And then it stalks me. It hunts you down because you’re like: ‘Ah, that’s going to have this problem, I’m going to put it aside.’ And then a few days later, you’re like: ‘Actually I think I know how to solve that problem.’ At some point it just becomes this black hole that sucks you in and you can’t think about anything else but this.” Mark Zuckerberg gave similar advice in a previous Startup Archive answer: “I always think the most important thing entrepreneurs should do is pick something they care about and work on it, but don’t actually commit to turning it into a company until it’s working. If you look at the data of the very best companies, I think a tremendous percentage of them have been built that way and not from people who decided upfront that they wanted to start a company because you just get locked into a local maxima a lot of the time.” Let great ideas chase you and don’t turn it into a company until it’s working. There’s almost always a ton of work you you can do upfront to de-risk an idea before turning it into a company. And perhaps just as important: you want to make sure you’re still excited about the idea after a few months and the novelty has worn off—it should be all you can think about. Companies are almost always a 10 year project if they work and a 2-3 year project if they fail. It’s worth it to be patient before jumping in with two feet.

Michael McGuiness

62,662 views • 2 years ago

we all dream of those big wins in life the 100x, the multi-million dollar trade, or even just 10x of what you started with in 7 days i’ve been fortunate enough to experience a few of those over the past few years, and the reality is when you do win big, it doesn’t feel like it at all it hits for a split second, and then your brain just normalizes it it's a part of how to get there in the first place, but makes it a lot easier to lose it if you don't have the right guardrails in place and in that exact moment, you being even keeled doesn’t mean the number in front of you isn’t life changing it is this is where you have to slow down a bit, breathe, settle your mind don’t just roll it into some bullshit take some off the table, step away for a few days if you have to, funny enough, blowing let's say 10k of it on a beautiful trip to tokyo will save you so much because once you actually process what just happened, your future self will thank you for it the truth is, even if you think you’re going for a certain number, the moment you hit it, you’ll want more and more, and more anyone who's been in the same position will tell you the exact same thing ironically the people that win are addicted to winning and if you ask the same people in a year after that big win, what they regret and where are they proud of themselves? they will tell you they regretted rolling it over and giving some/all back or they are proud for switching back on the switch all of this is real, but it’s also exactly how i imagined it would feel years ago before it ever happened manifest your life, the feeling not just the number everything happens twice, first in your mind, then in reality

we all dream of those big wins in life the 100x, the multi-million dollar trade, or even just 10x of what you started with in 7 days i’ve been fortunate enough to experience a few of those over the past few years, and the reality is when you do win big, it doesn’t feel like it at all it hits for a split second, and then your brain just normalizes it it's a part of how to get there in the first place, but makes it a lot easier to lose it if you don't have the right guardrails in place and in that exact moment, you being even keeled doesn’t mean the number in front of you isn’t life changing it is this is where you have to slow down a bit, breathe, settle your mind don’t just roll it into some bullshit take some off the table, step away for a few days if you have to, funny enough, blowing let's say 10k of it on a beautiful trip to tokyo will save you so much because once you actually process what just happened, your future self will thank you for it the truth is, even if you think you’re going for a certain number, the moment you hit it, you’ll want more and more, and more anyone who's been in the same position will tell you the exact same thing ironically the people that win are addicted to winning and if you ask the same people in a year after that big win, what they regret and where are they proud of themselves? they will tell you they regretted rolling it over and giving some/all back or they are proud for switching back on the switch all of this is real, but it’s also exactly how i imagined it would feel years ago before it ever happened manifest your life, the feeling not just the number everything happens twice, first in your mind, then in reality

۟

23,017 views • 4 months ago

Since January 2020 the US dollar has lost 28% of its value. If you owned assets, a house, stocks, AI plays, you’re probably fine. Your nominal numbers went up. If you didn’t own assets during that period, you lost purchasing power and you’re in a personal crisis. And you’re furious at the politicians. That’s why people like Zohran Mamdani are gaining traction. They’re speaking directly to that pain. And people are going to vote for them. We have a severe structural problem in this country. If we don’t address it, it gets worse. That’s not a prediction. That’s just math.

Since January 2020 the US dollar has lost 28% of its value. If you owned assets, a house, stocks, AI plays, you’re probably fine. Your nominal numbers went up. If you didn’t own assets during that period, you lost purchasing power and you’re in a personal crisis. And you’re furious at the politicians. That’s why people like Zohran Mamdani are gaining traction. They’re speaking directly to that pain. And people are going to vote for them. We have a severe structural problem in this country. If we don’t address it, it gets worse. That’s not a prediction. That’s just math.

Anthony Scaramucci

26,486 views • 2 months ago

MOST OF THESE APPS DON'T HAVE A BUSINESS MODEL. NO VALUE. Builders, let me share a simple thought. Just because AI can build an app in minutes doesn't mean the world needs that app. We're already seeing thousands of apps that look fancy but solve nothing. They get launched, get a few clicks, and then nobody uses them again. Before building anything, ask yourself: "Would I use this app every day? Does it solve a real problem? Does it save time, make life easier, educate, entertain, or help someone earn money?" If the answer is no, go back to the drawing board. People don't pay for apps. People pay for value. If your app helps them achieve something important, they'll use it. If it doesn't, they'll ignore it no matter how beautiful the design looks. There are still huge opportunities in healthcare, education, media, productivity, gaming, finance, local services, and many other areas. The next big app on Pi Network might not be the most complicated one. It might be a simple app that solves one problem extremely well. Stop building copycats. Stop building for hype. Build something useful. Build something people need. Build something that even you would use every day. That's how real adoption happens. That's how you attract users. And that's how builders create lasting value.

MOST OF THESE APPS DON'T HAVE A BUSINESS MODEL. NO VALUE. Builders, let me share a simple thought. Just because AI can build an app in minutes doesn't mean the world needs that app. We're already seeing thousands of apps that look fancy but solve nothing. They get launched, get a few clicks, and then nobody uses them again. Before building anything, ask yourself: "Would I use this app every day? Does it solve a real problem? Does it save time, make life easier, educate, entertain, or help someone earn money?" If the answer is no, go back to the drawing board. People don't pay for apps. People pay for value. If your app helps them achieve something important, they'll use it. If it doesn't, they'll ignore it no matter how beautiful the design looks. There are still huge opportunities in healthcare, education, media, productivity, gaming, finance, local services, and many other areas. The next big app on Pi Network might not be the most complicated one. It might be a simple app that solves one problem extremely well. Stop building copycats. Stop building for hype. Build something useful. Build something people need. Build something that even you would use every day. That's how real adoption happens. That's how you attract users. And that's how builders create lasting value.

0NEDEEL

16,169 views • 2 months ago

$100k/m startup idea: People aren't going to stop eating fast food. So I built Cheat Day - an app that ranks every fast food so you always know the smartest thing to order. Designed in Figma. Built into a real app with Superapp AI in just a few hours. Would you use it?

$100k/m startup idea: People aren't going to stop eating fast food. So I built Cheat Day - an app that ranks every fast food so you always know the smartest thing to order. Designed in Figma. Built into a real app with Superapp AI in just a few hours. Would you use it?

Satya

16,935 views • 1 month ago

Why Rust is overused right now Martin Odersky (Creator of Scala): "Right now, rust is actually overused because a lot of people push Rust for things higher up in the stack Where a garbage collector is fine, but essentially you still want to code without. And that is, for me, a bit an exercise in doing it intellectually just because you can I don't really think there's a big sense in it. If you have the memory for a garbage collector, you should absolutely use one, because it makes a lot of things simpler. So, yes, of course, if given enough brains, I can write code around and I can do that, but why should you? It can be much simpler."

Why Rust is overused right now Martin Odersky (Creator of Scala): "Right now, rust is actually overused because a lot of people push Rust for things higher up in the stack Where a garbage collector is fine, but essentially you still want to code without. And that is, for me, a bit an exercise in doing it intellectually just because you can I don't really think there's a big sense in it. If you have the memory for a garbage collector, you should absolutely use one, because it makes a lot of things simpler. So, yes, of course, if given enough brains, I can write code around and I can do that, but why should you? It can be much simpler."

Ryan Peterman

215,156 views • 12 days ago

As I always said, the worst thing you can do to a finsub is NOT draining it to zero… actually that’s a real privilege for it If you actually want to punish a finsub for real the best thing you can do is sending it back the money and not letting it send Seeing him crying and begging like that turned me on even more than draining him lmao

Sensitive content

As I always said, the worst thing you can do to a finsub is NOT draining it to zero… actually that’s a real privilege for it If you actually want to punish a finsub for real the best thing you can do is sending it back the money and not letting it send Seeing him crying and begging like that turned me on even more than draining him lmao

The Cheating CashMaster (21k)

37,032 views • 1 year ago

jihoon answering teumes’ worries at dawn live 👤: I really wanted to receive a psychiatric (treatment) but I don’t have the courage to do it. Should I go? I think I’m going to have a hard time accepting that I am falling apart. 🐶: but I recommend going to the psychiatrist, whether if it’s receiving a psychological counselling or a psychiatric examination, it’s good to receive a treatment for it. Everyone, going to the psychiatrist doesn’t make you weird. If you caught a cold, you go to the internal medicine department, If your joints or bones hurts, you go to the orthopaedics. It’s just a cold that come to the mind. It’s not that going to the psychiatrist makes me a weird person, no it’s not that. It’s just that I’m exhausted for a while, it’s just a hospital. There’s more people going there more than you think, if you go to hospital, the queuing are the longest. Nowadays, it’s the same as the past too but there’s no one who doesn't have a hard time. In this hard world, although there are people who look at the hard times in a good way, & there are also people who don’t look at it in a good way… but since it’s a world where we lived together, there's nothing we can do about it, right? But those kind of, “ah I went to the psychiatrist & I collapsed” I don’t think you have think of that. It’s just, “I am having a hard time these days so I’m just going to get help for it” just think of it as if you caught a cold. I hope you don’t think of this deeply. Of course you can go. If your stomach hurt, you can go to the internal medicine, if your head hurts, you can go to the Otolaryngology. It’s just that your heart is having a hard time for a while. This is not something to be ashamed of, you don’t need to read the air with the people around you for this. Always cheer up, even if you collapse, let's practice the strength that can make you rise again slowly, treasure makers. You can do it, everyone, I know you can do it.

jihoon answering teumes’ worries at dawn live 👤: I really wanted to receive a psychiatric (treatment) but I don’t have the courage to do it. Should I go? I think I’m going to have a hard time accepting that I am falling apart. 🐶: but I recommend going to the psychiatrist, whether if it’s receiving a psychological counselling or a psychiatric examination, it’s good to receive a treatment for it. Everyone, going to the psychiatrist doesn’t make you weird. If you caught a cold, you go to the internal medicine department, If your joints or bones hurts, you go to the orthopaedics. It’s just a cold that come to the mind. It’s not that going to the psychiatrist makes me a weird person, no it’s not that. It’s just that I’m exhausted for a while, it’s just a hospital. There’s more people going there more than you think, if you go to hospital, the queuing are the longest. Nowadays, it’s the same as the past too but there’s no one who doesn't have a hard time. In this hard world, although there are people who look at the hard times in a good way, & there are also people who don’t look at it in a good way… but since it’s a world where we lived together, there's nothing we can do about it, right? But those kind of, “ah I went to the psychiatrist & I collapsed” I don’t think you have think of that. It’s just, “I am having a hard time these days so I’m just going to get help for it” just think of it as if you caught a cold. I hope you don’t think of this deeply. Of course you can go. If your stomach hurt, you can go to the internal medicine, if your head hurts, you can go to the Otolaryngology. It’s just that your heart is having a hard time for a while. This is not something to be ashamed of, you don’t need to read the air with the people around you for this. Always cheer up, even if you collapse, let's practice the strength that can make you rise again slowly, treasure makers. You can do it, everyone, I know you can do it.

ain

376,990 views • 2 years ago

Camilla Araujo explains why people spend so much money on OF: “One person spent $1.4M in a year” “If you can convince someone that you’re in a relationship with Sophie Rain, they’re buying it. You know how much one person spent? Like $1.4 million in a year. You’re selling an illusion. You’re selling a relationship. You’re selling an experience. But the reason people do it is because it’s a drug. It’s addiction. It’s a serious thing. And it’s also the person. If you drop a link and you are Logan Paul, people are going to buy it because you’re Logan Paul. It’s because of who you are. People want to feel that experience with me.”

Sensitive content

Camilla Araujo explains why people spend so much money on OF: “One person spent $1.4M in a year” “If you can convince someone that you’re in a relationship with Sophie Rain, they’re buying it. You know how much one person spent? Like $1.4 million in a year. You’re selling an illusion. You’re selling a relationship. You’re selling an experience. But the reason people do it is because it’s a drug. It’s addiction. It’s a serious thing. And it’s also the person. If you drop a link and you are Logan Paul, people are going to buy it because you’re Logan Paul. It’s because of who you are. People want to feel that experience with me.”

Mikli

1,457,692 views • 4 months ago

Urijah Faber discusses pay in Real American Freestyle: “The pay is important... You can make as much as a doctor or a lawyer if you have four or five matches in a year. That’s never been heard of, and that’s why people are going to be tuning in. There’s going to be bigger hype, and this thing is going to have a lot of success.”

Urijah Faber discusses pay in Real American Freestyle: “The pay is important... You can make as much as a doctor or a lawyer if you have four or five matches in a year. That’s never been heard of, and that’s why people are going to be tuning in. There’s going to be bigger hype, and this thing is going to have a lot of success.”

Ariel Helwani

257,793 views • 4 months ago

Building apps that actually make money is hard So I built a platform that validates app ideas for you Instead of spending months building an app that flops.. now you can validate your app ideas within a few days Just enter your app idea and this tool does the rest for you: → analyses your target market → generates the ads → creates an entire fake sales funnel to assess REAL purchase intent… to find out whether you should actually build the thing.. or try something else its called prelauncher and its available now

Building apps that actually make money is hard So I built a platform that validates app ideas for you Instead of spending months building an app that flops.. now you can validate your app ideas within a few days Just enter your app idea and this tool does the rest for you: → analyses your target market → generates the ads → creates an entire fake sales funnel to assess REAL purchase intent… to find out whether you should actually build the thing.. or try something else its called prelauncher and its available now

Adam Lyttle

100,263 views • 3 months ago

Palantir CEO Alex Karp says people think we’re in an AI bubble because a lot of AI just doesn’t work: “If you just buy LLMs off the shelf and try to do any of this, it won’t work.” “It’s not precise enough. You can’t do underwriting. You can’t do these things that are regulated.” “People have tried things that just can never work. You buy a LLM, put it on your stack, and wonder why it’s not working.” “What you’re going to see, especially in America, is people trying to do something like Ontology by hand.” “Once you build a software layer to orchestrate and manage the LLMs in a language your enterprise understands, you actually can create value.” “There’s a lot of discussion on if we’re in an AI bubble. What is the meaning of this bubble? If anything, we’re just in a lag. There’s a lot of AI, some of it works.” “Go back to the battlefield context: everybody in the world assumed this would not work. But now it does work. Now the question is, ‘How can I get it to work for my country?’” “Palantir barely has a sales force. In fact, it seems to be getting smaller and smaller every time I go see them.”

Palantir CEO Alex Karp says people think we’re in an AI bubble because a lot of AI just doesn’t work: “If you just buy LLMs off the shelf and try to do any of this, it won’t work.” “It’s not precise enough. You can’t do underwriting. You can’t do these things that are regulated.” “People have tried things that just can never work. You buy a LLM, put it on your stack, and wonder why it’s not working.” “What you’re going to see, especially in America, is people trying to do something like Ontology by hand.” “Once you build a software layer to orchestrate and manage the LLMs in a language your enterprise understands, you actually can create value.” “There’s a lot of discussion on if we’re in an AI bubble. What is the meaning of this bubble? If anything, we’re just in a lag. There’s a lot of AI, some of it works.” “Go back to the battlefield context: everybody in the world assumed this would not work. But now it does work. Now the question is, ‘How can I get it to work for my country?’” “Palantir barely has a sales force. In fact, it seems to be getting smaller and smaller every time I go see them.”

Jawwwn

695,479 views • 7 months ago

Marc Andreessen explains why startups are an “irrational act” “The biggest thing people don’t understand about what it’s like to be a startup founder is it gets very romanticized. Even whey they fail, it still gets romanticized about what a great adventure it was. But the reality of it is most of what happens is people telling you no, and then they usually follow that with ‘you’re stupid.’ No, I will not come to work for you. No, I’m not going to buy your product.” Marc explains why: “When you’re a founder, you cannot let on that this is happening because it will cause people to think that you’re weak and they’ll lose faith in you. So you have to pretend you’re having a great time when you’re dying inside. Just misery.” Why do it then? “For most of these people - on a risk-adjusted basis - it’s probably an irrational act. They could probably be more financially successful on average if they just got like a real job in a big company. But some people just have an irrational need to do something new and build something for themselves and some people just can’t tolerate having bosses.” Video source: Lex Fridman (2023)

Marc Andreessen explains why startups are an “irrational act” “The biggest thing people don’t understand about what it’s like to be a startup founder is it gets very romanticized. Even whey they fail, it still gets romanticized about what a great adventure it was. But the reality of it is most of what happens is people telling you no, and then they usually follow that with ‘you’re stupid.’ No, I will not come to work for you. No, I’m not going to buy your product.” Marc explains why: “When you’re a founder, you cannot let on that this is happening because it will cause people to think that you’re weak and they’ll lose faith in you. So you have to pretend you’re having a great time when you’re dying inside. Just misery.” Why do it then? “For most of these people - on a risk-adjusted basis - it’s probably an irrational act. They could probably be more financially successful on average if they just got like a real job in a big company. But some people just have an irrational need to do something new and build something for themselves and some people just can’t tolerate having bosses.” Video source: Lex Fridman (2023)

Startup Archive

70,042 views • 1 year ago

They call you racist, and think the conversation is over. News flash, this is not 1964 anymore. The American people are a lot smarter than that, and they’re not buying it. Because the reality is, people like me exist. What does that tell you? It tells you this country has made real progress. It tells you that millions of Americans are doing exactly what Martin Luther King Jr. called for, judging people not by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character. That’s not theory, that’s reality. But instead of celebrating that progress, some want to drag us backwards, into a system where race is everything, where success is assigned, where outcomes are engineered. That’s not empowerment, that’s limitation. The idea that someone can only succeed if a district is drawn for them, or if a box is checked for them, is an insult to the very people it claims to help. Here’s a better idea, be a great candidate. Work hard. Earn trust. Serve people. Put your name on the ballot and let voters decide.

They call you racist, and think the conversation is over. News flash, this is not 1964 anymore. The American people are a lot smarter than that, and they’re not buying it. Because the reality is, people like me exist. What does that tell you? It tells you this country has made real progress. It tells you that millions of Americans are doing exactly what Martin Luther King Jr. called for, judging people not by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character. That’s not theory, that’s reality. But instead of celebrating that progress, some want to drag us backwards, into a system where race is everything, where success is assigned, where outcomes are engineered. That’s not empowerment, that’s limitation. The idea that someone can only succeed if a district is drawn for them, or if a box is checked for them, is an insult to the very people it claims to help. Here’s a better idea, be a great candidate. Work hard. Earn trust. Serve people. Put your name on the ballot and let voters decide.

Wesley Hunt

267,628 views • 4 months ago

I built a real app today by describing what I wanted in plain English. That’s the promise of Replit ⠕. You start with an idea. You explain it in natural language. Replit turns it into a working app with hosting, auth, data, and AI already wired in. No setup. No tool switching. No fragile prototypes. What stood out is how far you can take it. From a rough concept to something you can actually ship, all in one place. Even on mobile. This is vibe coding as a complete workflow, not a shortcut. If you’ve ever wanted to turn an idea into a real product without friction, this is worth trying. Build here →

I built a real app today by describing what I wanted in plain English. That’s the promise of Replit ⠕. You start with an idea. You explain it in natural language. Replit turns it into a working app with hosting, auth, data, and AI already wired in. No setup. No tool switching. No fragile prototypes. What stood out is how far you can take it. From a rough concept to something you can actually ship, all in one place. Even on mobile. This is vibe coding as a complete workflow, not a shortcut. If you’ve ever wanted to turn an idea into a real product without friction, this is worth trying. Build here →

Parul Gautam

70,662 views • 8 months ago