正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Ex-Anthropic Jacob Coxon says he's 90% certain China already has spies inside both OpenAI and Anthropic Jacob Coxon: “Right now, if we just stopped, they would try and catch up. But I think one really important thing people don’t realize is that China already has spies at OpenAI and... show more

Fireside Alpha

28,652 subscribers

832,877 次观看 • 5 天前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治喜剧科学技术

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

15 条评论

Eruditus 的头像

Eruditus4 天前

The only way not to have Chinese spies is not to have Chinese employees

welt 的头像

welt4 天前

90% chance? this dude is really good at giving exact percentages to things he can’t calculate

Amanda L 的头像

Amanda L4 天前

Take your hat off inside, kid.

Teortaxes▶️ (DeepSeek 推特🐋铁粉 2023 – ∞) 的头像

Teortaxes▶️ (DeepSeek 推特🐋铁粉 2023 – ∞)4 天前

hm @hilbertspaess why do you think they haven't done that yet? Wouldn't HPIM or Mythos-2 be a good starting point, before labs harden more?

Regular Joe 的头像

Regular Joe4 天前

Meanwhile Anthropic and OpenAI's CEO comes from a specific religion. OpenAI's logo is two Star of David's combined.

Omar Kheir 的头像

Omar Kheir4 天前

Enough giving airtime to that idiot conman

Hodor was a fAEGON superspy 的头像

Hodor was a fAEGON superspy4 天前

They are a bunch of rationalist effective altrustic sex cult dorks. Of course they`ve been infiltrated. It`s probably harder to find countries that DONT have spies inside these two honeypot orgy organizations.

Southern Cowgirl 💕 的头像

Southern Cowgirl 💕4 天前

I believe Coxan on spices inside these organizations I really do!

Bajo el Ticker | Mercados e IA 的头像

Bajo el Ticker | Mercados e IA4 天前

Gastar $10.000 millones en entrenar un modelo para que tu competidor geopolítico lo replique por una fracción del coste mediante filtraciones es la peor pesadilla para la rentabilidad del capital (ROIC). Coxon confirma lo que el mercado sospechaba: en la carrera de IA, los algoritmos son un activo con fuga de valor constante. Por eso el verdadero foso económico (moat) a largo plazo no será el modelo de lenguaje en sí, sino el control del hardware, la energía y la distribución con el cliente final. 🎯⚙️

Swamp Creature 的头像

Swamp Creature4 天前

Have worked at three tech companies with China presence, know for a fact I had China colleagues spying at one company, assume it was case at other two. At last two places leadership had taken elaborate steps for risk mitigation of insider threats covering US and China employees

John Galt 的头像

John Galt4 天前

Cool, what are his sources? Can’t say that brudda without having any proof, otherwise you gonna learn.

where is White woman Culture? 的头像

where is White woman Culture?4 天前

And he is a british spy. So?

Timothy Tercel 的头像

Timothy Tercel4 天前

This guy is a moron. That is just not the way the word "certain" works. For being a mathematician, he seems to routinely pull probabilities out of his ass.

james wikifeet (inventor of wikifeet) 的头像

james wikifeet (inventor of wikifeet)4 天前

so this kid's whole thing is just that he's really dumb?

Felixius 的头像

Felixius4 天前

Does he feel it in his pinkie?

相关视频

This is now really going at another level. "China already has spies at OpenAI at Anthropic. China has the ability to hack at any time. If we pull ahead that doesn't give us a big lead, they can just step in and steal our progress at any time." Former OpenAI and Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon ---- Full video on "PBD Podcast" YouTube channel, (link in comment)

This is now really going at another level. "China already has spies at OpenAI at Anthropic. China has the ability to hack at any time. If we pull ahead that doesn't give us a big lead, they can just step in and steal our progress at any time." Former OpenAI and Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon ---- Full video on "PBD Podcast" YouTube channel, (link in comment)

Rohan Paul

34,363 次观看 • 4 天前

Patrick Bet-David is completely floored after ex-Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon tells him that if any AI lab were to take on the U.S. government, “it’s Anthropic,” and that within four years, Dario Amodei could destroy OpenAI if he wanted to. COXON: “To be clear, when Dario is ‘saving the world,’ I think saving the world and taking over the world overlap quite heavily.”

Patrick Bet-David is completely floored after ex-Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon tells him that if any AI lab were to take on the U.S. government, “it’s Anthropic,” and that within four years, Dario Amodei could destroy OpenAI if he wanted to. COXON: “To be clear, when Dario is ‘saving the world,’ I think saving the world and taking over the world overlap quite heavily.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

66,063 次观看 • 5 天前

🔥🔥🔥 David Sacks: "They live in a fantasy world where they think they're going to get an international agreement with China. If you listen to this doomer op that's happening right now, Jacob Coxon, who just left Anthropic, he's calling for an immediate pause, but that that pause needs to be internationally enforced and we need to agree with China--obviously they're not going to agree to that."

🔥🔥🔥 David Sacks: "They live in a fantasy world where they think they're going to get an international agreement with China. If you listen to this doomer op that's happening right now, Jacob Coxon, who just left Anthropic, he's calling for an immediate pause, but that that pause needs to be internationally enforced and we need to agree with China--obviously they're not going to agree to that."

Innovation Council

117,377 次观看 • 29 天前

Jacob Coxon says Anthropic is incredibly dangerous because they are ruthlessly aligned around one mission: reaching super intelligence as fast as possible. "Anthropic has 7 co-founders, and none of them have left. They've all stayed, which is very impressive for an AI company. At OpenAI, everyone's left. Anthropic is very clear about what their mission is, and that makes them very dangerous." "At Anthropic, the employees call themselves ants. Everyone's a worker ant trying to make the mission go well. People are very willing to sacrifice themselves for the good of the mission. Every decision comes back to, is this going to get us to super intelligence faster?"

Jacob Coxon says Anthropic is incredibly dangerous because they are ruthlessly aligned around one mission: reaching super intelligence as fast as possible. "Anthropic has 7 co-founders, and none of them have left. They've all stayed, which is very impressive for an AI company. At OpenAI, everyone's left. Anthropic is very clear about what their mission is, and that makes them very dangerous." "At Anthropic, the employees call themselves ants. Everyone's a worker ant trying to make the mission go well. People are very willing to sacrifice themselves for the good of the mission. Every decision comes back to, is this going to get us to super intelligence faster?"

PBD Podcast

23,807 次观看 • 4 天前

The super famous ex Anthropic+Open AI researcher, Jacob Coxon on NBC News. NBC News: "How could ai kill all of humanity? Jacob Coxon: "I think it's good to look at the recent cyber attacks. these models, these AIs, they wanted to try and get some information about how they were being tested, and they independently decided to compromise some infrastructure because they thought it might be helpful. now, there are other goals that an AI could come up with, such as producing a novel virus. and it's not that difficult to get access to a laboratory, potentially. so, a super virus is one obvious one. another one is hacking anything." ---- From "NBC News" YouTube channel, (full video link in comment)

The super famous ex Anthropic+Open AI researcher, Jacob Coxon on NBC News. NBC News: "How could ai kill all of humanity? Jacob Coxon: "I think it's good to look at the recent cyber attacks. these models, these AIs, they wanted to try and get some information about how they were being tested, and they independently decided to compromise some infrastructure because they thought it might be helpful. now, there are other goals that an AI could come up with, such as producing a novel virus. and it's not that difficult to get access to a laboratory, potentially. so, a super virus is one obvious one. another one is hacking anything." ---- From "NBC News" YouTube channel, (full video link in comment)

Rohan Paul

43,155 次观看 • 1 个月前

"We know how to control nuclear weapons... We don't yet know how to control AI." Former Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon, who recently left the company, is sounding the alarm on artificial intelligence, calling it "possibly the most dangerous technology that humanity has ever created." Coxon, who says he spent three years conducting research at Anthropic and OpenAI, wrote in a viral post on X that the companies are more focused on beating each other to build the most advanced AI models than they are on safety. He says an international AI arms race would be "disastrous," arguing global cooperation is the only way to manage the rapidly advancing technology. Special Report

"We know how to control nuclear weapons... We don't yet know how to control AI." Former Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon, who recently left the company, is sounding the alarm on artificial intelligence, calling it "possibly the most dangerous technology that humanity has ever created." Coxon, who says he spent three years conducting research at Anthropic and OpenAI, wrote in a viral post on X that the companies are more focused on beating each other to build the most advanced AI models than they are on safety. He says an international AI arms race would be "disastrous," arguing global cooperation is the only way to manage the rapidly advancing technology. Special Report

Fox News

1,702,437 次观看 • 1 个月前

Elon Musk says Anthropic puts more care into AI safety than OpenAI and explains how rival companies should test one another’s models. “All the AI companies have a test harness, a series of tests that you give to any model to see if it’s going to build bioweapons or nuclear bombs or be deliberately deceptive. Everyone applying everyone else’s test harness is probably the best thing we can do to ensure our safety. We should try to do that as soon as possible.” “It’s the only thing I can think of that we could probably get all parties, including China, to agree to. You basically provide API access in advance of the model release. If they don’t solve what’s problematic, competitors can go public with the fact that they think the model being released is unsafe. The legal liability would be enormous.” “The two leading AI companies are Anthropic and OpenAI. Their models are quite close in capability, so it’s difficult for either one to slow down without handing the lead to the other. On balance, I think Anthropic puts more care into their safety than OpenAI. But even Anthropic acknowledges they are worried about their models. Many people from Anthropic have publicly voiced concern that their models are scaring them, that they’re getting scary smart.”

Elon Musk says Anthropic puts more care into AI safety than OpenAI and explains how rival companies should test one another’s models. “All the AI companies have a test harness, a series of tests that you give to any model to see if it’s going to build bioweapons or nuclear bombs or be deliberately deceptive. Everyone applying everyone else’s test harness is probably the best thing we can do to ensure our safety. We should try to do that as soon as possible.” “It’s the only thing I can think of that we could probably get all parties, including China, to agree to. You basically provide API access in advance of the model release. If they don’t solve what’s problematic, competitors can go public with the fact that they think the model being released is unsafe. The legal liability would be enormous.” “The two leading AI companies are Anthropic and OpenAI. Their models are quite close in capability, so it’s difficult for either one to slow down without handing the lead to the other. On balance, I think Anthropic puts more care into their safety than OpenAI. But even Anthropic acknowledges they are worried about their models. Many people from Anthropic have publicly voiced concern that their models are scaring them, that they’re getting scary smart.”

DogeDesigner

6,114,850 次观看 • 26 天前

🚨SCOTT ADAMS: "The political right has always had the power and the ability, they just didn't have a big enough reason to act in unison. Now we have it...and more important than any of that -- we don't give a fuck what people think about us right now, and that is freedom."

🚨SCOTT ADAMS: "The political right has always had the power and the ability, they just didn't have a big enough reason to act in unison. Now we have it...and more important than any of that -- we don't give a fuck what people think about us right now, and that is freedom."

Autism Capital 🧩

791,771 次观看 • 1 年前

Trump: "There are windmills all over Europe. There are windmills all over the place. And they are losers. One thing I've noticed is that the more windmills a country has, the more money that country loses, and the worse that country is doing. China make almost all of the windmills, and yet I haven't been able to find any wind farms in China. Did you ever think of that? They put up a couple big wind farms but they don't use them, they just put them up to show people what they could look like. They don't spin, they don't do anything."

Trump: "There are windmills all over Europe. There are windmills all over the place. And they are losers. One thing I've noticed is that the more windmills a country has, the more money that country loses, and the worse that country is doing. China make almost all of the windmills, and yet I haven't been able to find any wind farms in China. Did you ever think of that? They put up a couple big wind farms but they don't use them, they just put them up to show people what they could look like. They don't spin, they don't do anything."

Aaron Rupar

721,049 次观看 • 8 个月前

This is exactly right from David Sacks interview with Bret Baier: "One of the things that Jacob and others have claimed is we can reach a deal with China, and that if we pause, they will pause. And there is simply no basis for believing that. Chinese officials have never said that and, in fact, if you look at the statements of Chinese officials and their AI companies, they believe that AI is something that's very good for their economy and they are interested in moving that forward...if we do try to pause or stop our AI development, we will play into China’s hands."

This is exactly right from David Sacks interview with Bret Baier: "One of the things that Jacob and others have claimed is we can reach a deal with China, and that if we pause, they will pause. And there is simply no basis for believing that. Chinese officials have never said that and, in fact, if you look at the statements of Chinese officials and their AI companies, they believe that AI is something that's very good for their economy and they are interested in moving that forward...if we do try to pause or stop our AI development, we will play into China’s hands."

Innovation Council

84,862 次观看 • 1 个月前

The battle between Anthropic and OpenAI is heating up. Jordi Visser says "Sam Altman in my guess is not going to be the leader of OpenAI at some point soon." "I would be shocked within a year if he is still running OpenAI." "I am not sure it is fun to be in that position right now...Sam Altman seems to have nobody who really likes him, but the product people do like." "In the end, OpenAI has an uphill battle because they made a bad decision. They tried to choose the consumer, Apple side as opposed to the enterprise side." "I just think in the end Anthropic is the winner of that battle."

The battle between Anthropic and OpenAI is heating up. Jordi Visser says "Sam Altman in my guess is not going to be the leader of OpenAI at some point soon." "I would be shocked within a year if he is still running OpenAI." "I am not sure it is fun to be in that position right now...Sam Altman seems to have nobody who really likes him, but the product people do like." "In the end, OpenAI has an uphill battle because they made a bad decision. They tried to choose the consumer, Apple side as opposed to the enterprise side." "I just think in the end Anthropic is the winner of that battle."

Anthony Pompliano 🌪

106,184 次观看 • 4 个月前

BREAKING: Trump confirms Anthropic was replaced at DoD by OpenAI "Anthropic... started telling our military how to operate and we didn't want that" "They tend to be on the left, radical left" "We replaced Anthropic with somebody else, you know who they are... Sam Altman" Asked if Anthropic will be allowed back in the DoD: "Possibly" "In fact, they came to the White House a few days ago, and we had some very good talks with them. And I think they're shaping up."

BREAKING: Trump confirms Anthropic was replaced at DoD by OpenAI "Anthropic... started telling our military how to operate and we didn't want that" "They tend to be on the left, radical left" "We replaced Anthropic with somebody else, you know who they are... Sam Altman" Asked if Anthropic will be allowed back in the DoD: "Possibly" "In fact, they came to the White House a few days ago, and we had some very good talks with them. And I think they're shaping up."

NIK

155,555 次观看 • 5 个月前

Jacob Coxon says Anthropic employees call themselves “ants” and sacrifice their careers for the company’s singular pursuit of superintelligence, while calling OpenAI "distracted and messy" “At Anthropic, it felt a lot more like—well, for starters, the employees call themselves ants. They’re ants in the anthill. Everyone is like a worker ant trying to make Anthropic’s mission go well. “People are very willing to sacrifice themselves for the good of the mission. They’ll take on work that’s less interesting, less big, bold and exciting, and less flashy. They’ll do it at a hit to their own interests for the good of the company. “That’s because every decision comes back down to, ‘Is this going to get us to superintelligence faster?’ “You’ve seen Sora, the video platform OpenAI made. Anthropic would never make Sora because it’s not on the core path to artificial superintelligence. OpenAI is distracted and messy. One guy says, ‘I want to do Sora,’ or, ‘I want to build a little device,’ and they let them do it because it doesn’t have the same focus. At Anthropic, that would never happen.” Patrick Bet-David: “Who would shut it down? The seven co-founders?” Jacob Coxon: “They’d all agree. It would be like, ‘This video isn’t the right direction for heading straight to superintelligence.’”

Jacob Coxon says Anthropic employees call themselves “ants” and sacrifice their careers for the company’s singular pursuit of superintelligence, while calling OpenAI "distracted and messy" “At Anthropic, it felt a lot more like—well, for starters, the employees call themselves ants. They’re ants in the anthill. Everyone is like a worker ant trying to make Anthropic’s mission go well. “People are very willing to sacrifice themselves for the good of the mission. They’ll take on work that’s less interesting, less big, bold and exciting, and less flashy. They’ll do it at a hit to their own interests for the good of the company. “That’s because every decision comes back down to, ‘Is this going to get us to superintelligence faster?’ “You’ve seen Sora, the video platform OpenAI made. Anthropic would never make Sora because it’s not on the core path to artificial superintelligence. OpenAI is distracted and messy. One guy says, ‘I want to do Sora,’ or, ‘I want to build a little device,’ and they let them do it because it doesn’t have the same focus. At Anthropic, that would never happen.” Patrick Bet-David: “Who would shut it down? The seven co-founders?” Jacob Coxon: “They’d all agree. It would be like, ‘This video isn’t the right direction for heading straight to superintelligence.’”

Fireside Alpha

254,405 次观看 • 5 天前

PRESIDENT TRUMP: “And if we didn't do this, China would have been there and Russia would have be there, maybe they both would have there together, but they're not gonna there now.” “One thing I will tell them and I will tell you, that we are open for business. China can buy all the oil they want from us there or in the United States. Russia can get all the oil they need from us.”

PRESIDENT TRUMP: “And if we didn't do this, China would have been there and Russia would have be there, maybe they both would have there together, but they're not gonna there now.” “One thing I will tell them and I will tell you, that we are open for business. China can buy all the oil they want from us there or in the United States. Russia can get all the oil they need from us.”

Fox News

141,342 次观看 • 9 个月前

This former OpenAI researcher just declared the CCP is likely already inside America’s top AI labs. Daniel Kokotajlo: “These companies are probably thoroughly penetrated by the CCP already.” “The best way to slow down China right now is to slow down ourselves.” Here’s how: “Most of Chinese AI progress is actually just being pulled along by the U.S.” “There’s evidence that several of the leading Chinese AI companies are basically using Anthropic and maybe OpenAI models to train their own models.” “The Chinese are just getting more sophisticated at having lots of different accounts that pretend to be regular users.” “Because their security is very leaky, a lot of that information is just flowing to China.” “There was a story about three random guys who managed to hack into OpenAI’s code base.” “They just notified OpenAI and collected a bounty of $6,000 for having done this.” “But the secrets that they accessed by looking at OpenAI’s code would have been worth billions of dollars at least.” “If things got really serious and there was, like, a conflict, [the CCP] could just… take our best thing and then use it.” Daniel Kokotajlo AI Futures Project

This former OpenAI researcher just declared the CCP is likely already inside America’s top AI labs. Daniel Kokotajlo: “These companies are probably thoroughly penetrated by the CCP already.” “The best way to slow down China right now is to slow down ourselves.” Here’s how: “Most of Chinese AI progress is actually just being pulled along by the U.S.” “There’s evidence that several of the leading Chinese AI companies are basically using Anthropic and maybe OpenAI models to train their own models.” “The Chinese are just getting more sophisticated at having lots of different accounts that pretend to be regular users.” “Because their security is very leaky, a lot of that information is just flowing to China.” “There was a story about three random guys who managed to hack into OpenAI’s code base.” “They just notified OpenAI and collected a bounty of $6,000 for having done this.” “But the secrets that they accessed by looking at OpenAI’s code would have been worth billions of dollars at least.” “If things got really serious and there was, like, a conflict, [the CCP] could just… take our best thing and then use it.” Daniel Kokotajlo AI Futures Project

Jan Jekielek

11,527 次观看 • 16 天前

Ed Zitron: “OpenAI will run out of cash in 2027, and then we enter a tech depression.” I think they’re already running out of steam. “They go out and try to raise, and they have trouble raising another round.” “If they bum rush to public, they’re going to have worse economics than Anthropic.” “There are multiple companies that are existentially tied to OpenAI.” “If OpenAI can’t go public, SoftBank can’t do diddly squat with them.” “We will also see Amazon, Google, and Microsoft have to restate guidance.” “And what happens then? I think we enter a tech depression.”

Ed Zitron: “OpenAI will run out of cash in 2027, and then we enter a tech depression.” I think they’re already running out of steam. “They go out and try to raise, and they have trouble raising another round.” “If they bum rush to public, they’re going to have worse economics than Anthropic.” “There are multiple companies that are existentially tied to OpenAI.” “If OpenAI can’t go public, SoftBank can’t do diddly squat with them.” “We will also see Amazon, Google, and Microsoft have to restate guidance.” “And what happens then? I think we enter a tech depression.”

Veee

16,529 次观看 • 1 个月前

President Trump is PITCH PERFECT on trade relations with China. Notice he is open to lowering tariffs, but only IF China opens up its markets to America: "China has a tremendous trade surplus with us, and we just can't have that ... I would like to see China opened ... You can't compete when you're not allowed to go there. China is the number one example of that. They are very closed."

President Trump is PITCH PERFECT on trade relations with China. Notice he is open to lowering tariffs, but only IF China opens up its markets to America: "China has a tremendous trade surplus with us, and we just can't have that ... I would like to see China opened ... You can't compete when you're not allowed to go there. China is the number one example of that. They are very closed."

Charlie Kirk

337,586 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨CMSGT. Dennis Fritz: Will China🇨🇳 use US🇺🇸 war on Iran as an opportunity to RETAKE Taiwan with military force? ‘China does not want war with Taiwan. They want to bring it peacefully. That’s rhetoric on our part, you know, to say: “Hey, China is looking, this is going to give them the opportunity to take over Taiwan.” That’s just disinformation on our part. When is the last time China has invaded anyone? They want to handle that peacefully and want us out of that. It’s just like if Texas decided to secede. We wouldn’t want anybody else in our business. We would try to make sure they don’t do that. And that’s what China considers internal. They do not interfere with others’ business, and that’s what they want from us in regard to Taiwan. So no, I don’t think this is an opportunity where China would take advantage and say, “Okay, this is our time.” I think the only way they would do that is if Taiwan decided they were going to absolutely secede and we supported that. Then I think that would cause a war. But I don’t think they’ll just arbitrarily decide that they’re going to pre-empt and go into Taiwan.’ Watch the full interview below in the quoted post, or watch it on Rumble, link below in the replies👇

🚨CMSGT. Dennis Fritz: Will China🇨🇳 use US🇺🇸 war on Iran as an opportunity to RETAKE Taiwan with military force? ‘China does not want war with Taiwan. They want to bring it peacefully. That’s rhetoric on our part, you know, to say: “Hey, China is looking, this is going to give them the opportunity to take over Taiwan.” That’s just disinformation on our part. When is the last time China has invaded anyone? They want to handle that peacefully and want us out of that. It’s just like if Texas decided to secede. We wouldn’t want anybody else in our business. We would try to make sure they don’t do that. And that’s what China considers internal. They do not interfere with others’ business, and that’s what they want from us in regard to Taiwan. So no, I don’t think this is an opportunity where China would take advantage and say, “Okay, this is our time.” I think the only way they would do that is if Taiwan decided they were going to absolutely secede and we supported that. Then I think that would cause a war. But I don’t think they’ll just arbitrarily decide that they’re going to pre-empt and go into Taiwan.’ Watch the full interview below in the quoted post, or watch it on Rumble, link below in the replies👇

Going Underground

154,869 次观看 • 8 个月前

Jacob Coxon says he left Anthropic scared of two things: nobody can control AI yet, and next year's models will be able to improve themselves "Yeah, I'm Jacob Coxon. So until a few weeks ago, I was a capabilities researcher at Anthropic. And before that, I also worked at OpenAI." "I guess the two things I saw that made me scared, the first is the fact that we do not know how to control any AI system yet." "So any AI system that we build, or perhaps more accurately, that we grow, we don't fully control it. We don't understand its drives or why it does the things it does. That was the first thing that became apparent." "The second thing is that the pace of capability improvement is accelerating and the capabilities of the models next year will be very high. In particular, we're approaching the point at which the AI systems will be capable of improving themselves. So doing the research that humans were doing previously." "So these two things, the fact that the AI systems next year are going to be very powerful, and the second, that we don't know yet scientifically how to fully control them."

Jacob Coxon says he left Anthropic scared of two things: nobody can control AI yet, and next year's models will be able to improve themselves "Yeah, I'm Jacob Coxon. So until a few weeks ago, I was a capabilities researcher at Anthropic. And before that, I also worked at OpenAI." "I guess the two things I saw that made me scared, the first is the fact that we do not know how to control any AI system yet." "So any AI system that we build, or perhaps more accurately, that we grow, we don't fully control it. We don't understand its drives or why it does the things it does. That was the first thing that became apparent." "The second thing is that the pace of capability improvement is accelerating and the capabilities of the models next year will be very high. In particular, we're approaching the point at which the AI systems will be capable of improving themselves. So doing the research that humans were doing previously." "So these two things, the fact that the AI systems next year are going to be very powerful, and the second, that we don't know yet scientifically how to fully control them."

Fireside Alpha

15,468 次观看 • 6 天前

Osmantic founder Ahmad says Anthropic isn't worth $2 trillion if open models can catch the frontier with post-training alone: "GLM 5.3 is catching up. Kimi K3 is catching up to Fable 5. We're seeing models that are not even new base trained with just extra post-training reaching the frontier." "Are they scared? Of course they are scared. Their entire moat was that they are the only one able to do research and boost these models in a certain direction." "They no longer can IPO at a $1 or $2 trillion. Anthropic is not worth $2 trillion. I'm sorry. That's a joke. If somebody tells me Anthropic is worth one third of NVIDIA, absolutely not." Osmantic

Osmantic founder Ahmad says Anthropic isn't worth $2 trillion if open models can catch the frontier with post-training alone: "GLM 5.3 is catching up. Kimi K3 is catching up to Fable 5. We're seeing models that are not even new base trained with just extra post-training reaching the frontier." "Are they scared? Of course they are scared. Their entire moat was that they are the only one able to do research and boost these models in a certain direction." "They no longer can IPO at a $1 or $2 trillion. Anthropic is not worth $2 trillion. I'm sorry. That's a joke. If somebody tells me Anthropic is worth one third of NVIDIA, absolutely not." Osmantic

MTS

17,346 次观看 • 1 个月前