Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Excerpt from a powerful speech by Ukraine’s Permanent Representative to the UN Andrii Melnyk: What we have seen in the last weeks is that it is Moscow that has been providing substantial military support to the Tehran regime. It is Russia that is not just the principal ally of...

57,211 views • 3 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Global attention is focused on the Persian Gulf. But we have news too. March 2026 became the first month when, in terms of deep strikes, Ukraine reached parity with Russia. The average number of long-range kamikaze drones launched by Ukraine has significantly increased, while the average number of Russian strike drones launched against Ukraine has currently dropped to 90–110 per day. Experts offer various possible reasons for this decrease: ▪️ drone production in Russia was not fully localized and partially depended on Iran; ▪️ logistics routes have become longer, and Iran itself now needs drones; ▪️ Ukraine is partially hitting production sites and factories; ▪️ possibly, Russia is stockpiling drones, perhaps for hybrid provocations in other regions; ▪️ it is also likely that Russia has started supplying drones to Iran. By spring, Ukraine has significantly increased strikes on Russia using long-range kamikaze drones. For example: on the night of March 18, Russia officially claimed to have "shot down" 238 drones; however, some of them struck a chemical plant in Stavropol Krai and an electronics facility in Sevastopol. Ukraine has also expanded its operational range: over 1,500 km. Russians have openly expressed concern about the security of military infrastructure in the Urals. Ukraine has increased and continues to increase both the production and variety of drones. Moscow has been declared a target: from March 14 to 17, Russia reported about 250 drones in the Moscow air defense zone. 📹: Ukrainian Defenders destroying Russian air defense systems in Bryansk region of Russia

Anton Gerashchenko

715,739 views • 3 months ago

Footage of joint Russian-Iranian drills just two weeks ago, February 19, 2026. When Iran turned to Putin for help, it was refused, even though Russia called Iran an important ally and signed a strategic partnership agreement with it a year ago. Russia used Iran as a tool to put pressure on the West and destabilize the region: ◾️ Iran supplied Russia with thousands of Shahed-136 attack drones and technology for their production on Russian territory under the name "Geran-2." ◾️ Iran supplied Russia with short-range ballistic missiles. The total value of contracts for the supply of missiles and drones at the beginning of 2023 was estimated at $1.75-3 billion. ◾️ In return, Russia supplied its own weapons to Iran, including air defense systems and aircraft, which, as we can see, did not help Tehran. ◾️ Russia helped Iran develop its nuclear program to increase instability in the region and strengthen the "anti-Western coalition." ◾️ Using its influence, Russia maintained its military bases in Syria and shared military expenses with Tehran. ◾️ Iran, which has been under sanctions for decades, helped Russia circumvent sanctions: the development of the North-South Transport Corridor through Iran allowed Russia to export goods bypassing European ports. ◾️ Iran helped Russia master methods of covert financial transactions and parallel imports. Russia's main objective now is destabilization in the region, prolonging the war, driving up oil prices, and diverting financial and military aid away from Ukraine. ‼️ It is likely that Russians helped Iran develop a plan for strikes against the Persian Gulf countries. It is only natural that Ukrainians are now being asked for help in defending against Iranian drones. Ukraine has unique experience in countering Shahed drones. And Ukraine knows very well what Russia is like, what methods it uses, and what its goals are. What finally needs to be understood about Russia is that it has never been a reliable partner! Its partnership is rhetorical. Russia pursues exclusively its own interests, setting up, deceiving, and abandoning its so-called allies and violating the terms of agreements and deals. Syria, Venezuela, and Iran are vivid examples of this. 📹: Russia-Iran drills/Radio Liberty

Anton Gerashchenko

169,382 views • 4 months ago

🇷🇺 Strategic Asymmetry: Russia’s Countermove on INF Missiles by Elena Panina Russia has officially announced that it is abandoning the self-imposed restrictions under the moratorium on the deployment of intermediate and shorter-range missiles (INF), citing the actions of the United States, which has long stationed similar missiles in Europe and the Asia-Pacific Region (APR), thereby disrupting the status quo. Notably, this is the first time Russia has explicitly stated that the threat from U.S. INF missiles comes not only from Europe but also from the APR. ▪️ On the surface, Moscow’s lifting of the INF moratorium appears to be nothing more than a symmetrical response to Washington’s escalation. But on a deeper level, it is a move to seize the initiative disguised as a reactive measure. Russia is not just “responding”—it is crafting a new strategic framework in the absence of international constraints. And it now has, among other assets, the serial production of the Oreshnik missile system. Why the emphasis on the APR in the Russian Foreign Ministry’s statement, given that Russia lacks an extensive network of military bases there? This is where things get interesting. Russia currently cannot project power in the APR the way the U.S. does by deploying missiles in Guam, the Philippines, and Australia. But Russia has the Far East—from where it can reach Guam, Alaska, the U.S. Pacific coast, not to mention South Korea and Japan. Moreover, Russia now has a direct military ally in the region—North Korea—and the recent visits of high-ranking Russian military officials to Pyongyang were clearly not coincidental. Russia can operate through North Korea with relative freedom, including under the “sovereign proxy” model, much like the U.S. does with Israel in the Middle East. And let’s not forget the Chinese factor. ▪️ Thus, this marks a strategic paradigm shift. If Moscow previously relied on treaties and “playing by the rules,” it is now betting on unpredictability, interconnected fronts, and a balance of threats. For Europe, this creates at least two key flashpoints—Kaliningrad and Crimea. For U.S. allies in the Far East, there’s North Korea. And the U.S. itself now has to juggle between two fronts—or even three, if we include the Middle East. The Pentagon’s need to respond has multiplied, along with the growing complexity of strategic planning: the U.S. will now have to deploy missile defense systems worldwide—all while facing shortages of missiles and defense systems. This is the power of asymmetric strategy: you don’t need to be stronger, you just need to be less predictable and threaten from unexpected directions.

🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

16,164 views • 11 months ago