Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

🚨 EXCLUSIVE: EU MiCA regulations pose significant risks for stablecoin operators. CEO Paolo Ardoino 🤖 outlined misunderstood risks about MiCA regulations in our recent interview. Cash-deposit requirements could lead to bankruptcy for smaller EU-based banks. 👀👇

34,466 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

7 Kommentare

Profilbild von SebiiSb Trades
SebiiSb Tradesvor 1 Jahr

@Tether_to @paoloardoino MiCA was meant to bring clarity, but it might just bring chaos for the little guys.

Profilbild von Breakout
Breakoutvor 1 Jahr

Don’t risk Your personal account— Secure Your Capital Today with Breakout

Profilbild von Eddy
Eddyvor 1 Jahr

@Tether_to @paoloardoino How interesting, it's good to know.

Profilbild von LFGNOW
LFGNOWvor 1 Jahr

@Tether_to @paoloardoino MiCA could complicate things for smaller firms

Profilbild von NodesCrypto28
NodesCrypto28vor 1 Jahr

@Tether_to @paoloardoino For USDC is not significant risk?

Profilbild von Gareth Jenkinson
Gareth Jenkinsonvor 1 Jahr

It is the same risk for all stablecoin operators. But as Paolo explains, USDC-issuer Circle was in support of cash deposit requirements in Europe, while Tether and Paolo were advocating for Treasury bonds to be an acceptable reserve as they offer more stability and are fairly liquid when there are spikes in redemption requests.

Profilbild von Truth
Truthvor 1 Jahr

@Cointelegraph @Tether_to @paoloardoino 👀🔥

Ähnliche Videos

🚨🇪🇺 INTERVIEW: HE RAN FOR EU PARLIAMENT AS A JOKE AND EXPOSED HOW BROKEN IT IS Ever wondered why the EU is so messed up, and what happens behind the sc eyes? Well today I spoke to an MEP that started as a prank YouTuber, ran for EU Parliament as a joke, and ended up becoming the most‑voted candidate in the country. He gained so much traction that Elon publicly endorsed him: “Fidias for EU president!!” Inside the EU, his take is blunt: massive bureaucracy, slow decision‑making, and politicians obsessing over irrelevant stuff while Europe falls behind in tech, energy, defense, and innovation. On Ukraine, he says the war is a proxy fight Europe is paying for, the U.S. is profiting from, and diplomacy should’ve happened long ago, and not because he’s “pro‑Russia,” but because Europe is bleeding itself dry. He breaks down why the EU depends too much on the U.S. for defense, why pushing Russia toward China was a mistake, and why Europe has power but doesn’t use it well. He also explains why the EU keeps clashing with Elon Musk: free speech, platform regulation, and why his refusal to let governments control moderation changed the game. Bottom line: Europe isn’t doomed, but it is stuck. Unless it kills bureaucracy, fixes immigration, boosts innovation, and reconnects voters to power, it’s going to keep losing ground. If you want a raw, inside look at EU politics from someone who wasn’t supposed to be there, listen to this interview with Fidias Panayiotou 1:04 - How Fídias Panayiotou got into EU politics 8:16 - EU Criticisms, Bureaucracy, and how Fidias ended up in Cyprus 10:55 - The state of the EU, the Russia-Ukraine War, and Venezuela 17:08 - EU Defense and Dependence on the U.S. 21:20 - EU Politics, Effects of Voting, and What the Bureaucracy is doing 26:22 - Political Strategy for Being in an Independent Party 30:34 - In-App Elections and Voting: Making Politics Great Again 36:10 - Why Europe is Destroying Itself from Within 38:49 - Could the EU Fail? 40:35 - The Future of the EU is more Efficient 44:11 - The Effects of EU Regulations Online 49:00 - Illegal Immigration and the EU 53:19 - Fídias on Elon Musk: Elon’s Influence on him and the EU

Mario Nawfal

1,215,880 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

In a letter to the Dutch Parliament dated Oct 14 ( 🇳🇱 Minister of Economic Affairs Vincent Karremans lays out his reasons for seizing control of Nexperia from 🇨🇳 Wingtech (闻泰科技) and CEO 🇨🇳 Zhang Xuezheng (张学政): “Recently, I have received serious indications of governance deficiencies within Nexperia, stemming from specific actions by the CEO. These deficiencies pose an acute and serious threat to the company's continuity and thus the preservation of crucial technological knowledge, as well as production and development capabilities in the Netherlands and Europe. These deficiencies include the improper transfer of production capacity, financial resources, and intellectual property rights to a foreign entity owned by the CEO and not affiliated with Nexperia. This posed risks of knowledge leakage and, consequently, the loss of future production capacity, which is crucial for the European automotive, consumer electronics, and defense industries. The deficiencies have also, albeit less significantly, impacted the ongoing discussions between my ministry and Nexperia. Given the nature and severity of these signals regarding the deficiencies outlined, I believe there were potentially significant consequences for the Dutch and European economies, and thus a threat to economic security. The purpose of the order now imposed is to eliminate these risks and ensure the company's stability, in order to prevent a risky strategic dependency. In my opinion, this justifies the Wbg's exceptional efforts, and all interested parties are, of course, free to object.” Karremans does a TV interview on Buitenhof on Oct 19 (video; This is an English summary of the TV interview by Loek van Kooten, 🇳🇱🇪🇺🇯🇵🇨🇳 👉🏻 Karremans writes a summary thread too 👉🏻 news article 👉🏻 the webpage for the Oct 14 letter to Dutch Parliament 👉🏻

Byron Wan

77,969 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

🌐🇧🇪Euroclear CEO warns against using frozen Russian assets to lend to Ukraine. Valérie Urbain, CEO of Belgian depository Euroclear, which manages around €185 billion in frozen Russian state assets, is urging the European Union not to touch them. In a recent interview, she warned that the plan to use the funds as collateral for a loan worth up to €165 billion for the reconstruction of Ukraine could be perceived by Russia as a confiscation, which would trigger legal and economic retaliation. “If Russia perceives this reconstruction loan to Ukraine as a confiscation of its assets, it will not stand idly by. That is why we expect legal action against Euroclear and the possible seizure of assets that we hold on behalf of our clients in Russia,” Urbain said. She added that Russia could seize Belgian assets in Russia in retaliation, which would threaten the stability of the European financial system. Euroclear, a key player in the European financial market, now holds most of the €200 billion in frozen Russian reserves since the 2022 invasion of Ukraine. The EU is already using the profits from these assets to prop up Kiev, but the assets themselves remain untouched. The European Commission is proposing to use them as collateral for a loan that Ukraine would repay from future Russian reparations. Belgium, where Euroclear is based, is the biggest opponent of the plan because of the risks to its economy. Urbain instead proposes using the assets as leverage in peace talks with Russia, and has implicitly ruled out legal action against the EU if the forced transfer were to take place. The European Council is expected to decide on the proposal at a summit on December 18-19.

🌐geopolitics in the picture

35,598 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

🚨 WE ARE LAUNCHING TAILORED OPPORTUNITIES FOR PROFESSIONAL INVESTORS 🚨 Hello EstateX Family, EstateX is extending its offerings to a global audience of qualified/professional investors who want the opportunity to invest through tokenization into a multitude of high-performing assets across the globe. Get hands-on guidance and portfolio management by our CEO Steve Craggs and his team, a former RE/MAX England & Wales CEO with 30+ years of experience in hand-picking assets and building high performing portfolio’s, thanks to his experience in the industry and connections across multiple global brand real estate agencies and partnerships with developers & well-known resort operators. Our team will hand-pick the best assets according to your wishes for capital growth and income, with a proven track record of double digit returns, liquidity, exit-options and more. Within our due diligence we work with an independent RICS evaluator, comply with local regulations, and under-go all risk & compliance requirements for each asset. We make sure the developer is secure in it’s stability, delivery and track record, while for off-plans we make sure there is an insurance backed guarantee, prioritizing security of your funds. We find those unique properties that we have exclusive arrangements with, whether that be discounts, high-yields, long term-growth or special arrangements. This is for institutions, high net worth individuals and family offices, with 20-35% of company generated revenue flowing back into the $ESX token. With us also focusing on a very liquid investor group and working with fund managers to realise it, we are putting rapid steps to getting massive AuM value, which all will be tokenized on the $ESX Blockchain. AM I A PROFESSIONAL / QUALIFIED INVESTOR? Under European financial regulations (MiFID II, Annex II), a Professional Investor is someone who meets at least two of these criteria: 1. Has carried out significant transactions in the relevant market, averaging 10 per quarter over the last year 2. Holds a portfolio of financial instruments and cash deposits worth over €500,000 3. Has at least one year of professional experience in the financial sector in a role requiring investment knowledge OR Makes a minimum investment of €100,000, qualifying under Article 1(4)(d) of the Prospectus Regulation, without needing to meet the above criteria. Are you from outside the European Economic Area (EEA)? Feel free to reach out to explore your options. To register and show interest, please visit Onwards & upwards

EstateX

125,481 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Stablecoin on-ramps are broken in four fundamental ways. New report by Bluechip The Geography Tax > US/EU on-ramping: 0-0.3% > Central Africa: 15-20% Same dollar. Same stablecoin. 50x price difference. Why: Licensing is fragmented across jurisdictions. Local liquidity is thin. Banks treat these markets as afterthoughts. Operators must maintain exotic currency inventory in uncertain regulatory environments. No direct issuer relationships exist, so users rely on informal networks and local telco agents who set their own spreads. The Broken Funnel: Global card on-ramp completion: 21% Africa: 6% Asia: 7% Why: Failed KYC from document verification issues. Card declines from banks blocking crypto purchases. Session timeouts from complex multi-step flows. Poor localization. Lack of local payment method support. The journey was designed for crypto-native users, not first-time buyers. Cards Are Structurally Incompatible Emerging market card on-ramping: 7-10% US/EU: 3-5% Bank transfers: 0-0.3% Why: Card networks charge 1-3% MDR on every transaction. In e-commerce, merchants hide this in product margins. Stablecoins are pegged 1:1. There's no margin. You can't inflate the price of a dollar. Ramps must also price in chargeback risk and fraud losses. The cost has nowhere to go except to the user. This gap will not close. Remittance Corridors Are Broken Tanzania to Kenya traditional: 59.7% Stablecoin: 5-6% South Africa to China traditional: 22.8% Stablecoin: 1.2% Why: Correspondent banking adds layers of intermediaries. Each one takes a cut. Limited competition in smaller corridors. Weak FX liquidity. Cash-heavy payout networks. Settlement takes 1-5 days because every leg requires reconciliation. Stablecoins bypass all of this. Settlement in under an hour. But without accessible on-ramps, the technology sits behind a wall most users can't climb.

James | Snapcrackle

12,245 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten