Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

🚨🇺🇸 EX-U.S. COLONEL: THE RISKS OF TRUMP’S NEXT MOVE Daniel Davis says you can’t predict everything. One thing’s clear, Trump’s already hunting the next big move. Iran? Could get hit. Big price to pay. Venezuela? They’ll help if forced, then mess with stuff when we look away. Greenland? Europe... show more

Mario Nawfal

3,686,195 subscribers

32,955 views • 7 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics Finance

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🚨🇺🇸 🇮🇷 EX-U.S. COLONEL: HOW IRAN DIFFERS FROM VENEZUELA Daniel Davis warns Trump’s team might be planning a strike on Iran’s top leadership. Iran, though, is far more prepared than Maduro ever was. The Ayatollah isn’t ignoring the threat. With Jack Keane publicly saying “political targets” could be hit, this isn’t just talk. Davis says a strong Iranian strike could spark a wider conflict. Hezbollah, Houthis, and even Turkey could get dragged in. If Israel feels overwhelmed, the nuclear threat becomes real. One misstep could trigger a chain reaction no one can stop. Full Interview with Daniel Davis below

🚨🇺🇸 🇮🇷 EX-U.S. COLONEL: HOW IRAN DIFFERS FROM VENEZUELA Daniel Davis warns Trump’s team might be planning a strike on Iran’s top leadership. Iran, though, is far more prepared than Maduro ever was. The Ayatollah isn’t ignoring the threat. With Jack Keane publicly saying “political targets” could be hit, this isn’t just talk. Davis says a strong Iranian strike could spark a wider conflict. Hezbollah, Houthis, and even Turkey could get dragged in. If Israel feels overwhelmed, the nuclear threat becomes real. One misstep could trigger a chain reaction no one can stop. Full Interview with Daniel Davis below

Mario Nawfal

34,315 views • 7 months ago

🚨🇺🇸 🇮🇷 EX-U.S. COLONEL: U.S. STRIKE ON IRAN COULD BE IMMINENT Daniel Davis says Trump’s inner circle is openly discussing a major U.S. strike on Iran, targeting the regime. Lindsey Graham has said any delay is about going bigger. Fox’s Gen. Jack Keane has publicly listed targets: political leaders, military commanders, and key infrastructure. And Trump is watching. Davis says these are the people who would shape the plan. If it moves forward, it wouldn’t stay limited. U.S. bases across the region could be pulled into the fight. Full Interview with Daniel Davis below

🚨🇺🇸 🇮🇷 EX-U.S. COLONEL: U.S. STRIKE ON IRAN COULD BE IMMINENT Daniel Davis says Trump’s inner circle is openly discussing a major U.S. strike on Iran, targeting the regime. Lindsey Graham has said any delay is about going bigger. Fox’s Gen. Jack Keane has publicly listed targets: political leaders, military commanders, and key infrastructure. And Trump is watching. Davis says these are the people who would shape the plan. If it moves forward, it wouldn’t stay limited. U.S. bases across the region could be pulled into the fight. Full Interview with Daniel Davis below

Mario Nawfal

46,247 views • 7 months ago

$🚨🇮🇷🇺🇸🇮🇱 EX-U.S. COLONEL: COULD A U.S. STRIKE TURN IRAN INTO A FAILED STATE Daniel Davis says it straight: A strike on Iran’s leadership could ignite the whole region. Take out the Ayatollah and chaos could follow. Rival factions, civil war, power grabs. Think 1979 all over again. Davis warns that might be the plan. Not to replace leadership, but to break the country, keep it fractured, and stop it from being a coherent threat. If that’s the strategy, it’s a disaster waiting to happen. Full interview with Daniel Davis below$

🚨🇮🇷🇺🇸🇮🇱 EX-U.S. COLONEL: COULD A U.S. STRIKE TURN IRAN INTO A FAILED STATE Daniel Davis says it straight: A strike on Iran’s leadership could ignite the whole region. Take out the Ayatollah and chaos could follow. Rival factions, civil war, power grabs. Think 1979 all over again. Davis warns that might be the plan. Not to replace leadership, but to break the country, keep it fractured, and stop it from being a coherent threat. If that’s the strategy, it’s a disaster waiting to happen. Full interview with Daniel Davis below

Mario Nawfal

30,382 views • 7 months ago

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 EX-U.S. COLONEL: HOW CLOSE THE U.S. AND IRAN ARE TO WAR Daniel Davis says the U.S. and Iran are closer to conflict than most realize. Iran’s missiles caused serious damage in the 12-day war, forcing Israel into a ceasefire. With tens of thousands of U.S. troops scattered across the region, many at vulnerable bases, Iran has warned that if war breaks out, American sites won’t be safe. Israel and the U.S. have a history of taking out key leaders. Iran knows it, and any strike would be met with backups and contingency plans. If this escalates, it could get messy, spread across the region, and be hard to control. Full Interview with Daniel Davis below

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 EX-U.S. COLONEL: HOW CLOSE THE U.S. AND IRAN ARE TO WAR Daniel Davis says the U.S. and Iran are closer to conflict than most realize. Iran’s missiles caused serious damage in the 12-day war, forcing Israel into a ceasefire. With tens of thousands of U.S. troops scattered across the region, many at vulnerable bases, Iran has warned that if war breaks out, American sites won’t be safe. Israel and the U.S. have a history of taking out key leaders. Iran knows it, and any strike would be met with backups and contingency plans. If this escalates, it could get messy, spread across the region, and be hard to control. Full Interview with Daniel Davis below

Mario Nawfal

59,521 views • 7 months ago

🚨🇷🇺 INTERVIEW w/ COL. DANIEL DAVIS: THOUSANDS OF UKRAINIAN TROOPS ENCIRCLED - PUTIN’S NEW NUCLEAR WARHEAD Russia just claimed it successfully tested the Burevestnik (Skyfall) nuclear-powered cruise missile that can fly “forever” without refueling. 15,000 miles. 14 hours in the air. A weapon built to go anywhere and hit everywhere. At the same time, Moscow says it’s trapping 31 Ukrainian battalions in the Donbas, while the U.S. strikes back with major sanctions on Russia’s biggest oil companies, lifelines funding Putin’s war. Today I sit down with Daniel Davis Deep Dive, a former U.S. Army colonel who spent years on the ground studying Russia’s military, to get the truth behind the headlines. We dive into: •⁠ ⁠What the Skyfall test really proves about Russia’s nuclear reach •⁠ ⁠How Ukraine’s frontline could be on the brink of collapse in the east •⁠ ⁠Why new U.S. sanctions might seriously hurt Russia’s economy •⁠ ⁠Whether China’s next move could decide how this war ends •⁠ ⁠And why the world may already be closer to a NATO-Russia clash than anyone admits Col. Davis says global power isn’t static anymore. The players are shifting, the weapons are changing, and the margin for error is shrinking fast.

🚨🇷🇺 INTERVIEW w/ COL. DANIEL DAVIS: THOUSANDS OF UKRAINIAN TROOPS ENCIRCLED - PUTIN’S NEW NUCLEAR WARHEAD Russia just claimed it successfully tested the Burevestnik (Skyfall) nuclear-powered cruise missile that can fly “forever” without refueling. 15,000 miles. 14 hours in the air. A weapon built to go anywhere and hit everywhere. At the same time, Moscow says it’s trapping 31 Ukrainian battalions in the Donbas, while the U.S. strikes back with major sanctions on Russia’s biggest oil companies, lifelines funding Putin’s war. Today I sit down with Daniel Davis Deep Dive, a former U.S. Army colonel who spent years on the ground studying Russia’s military, to get the truth behind the headlines. We dive into: •⁠ ⁠What the Skyfall test really proves about Russia’s nuclear reach •⁠ ⁠How Ukraine’s frontline could be on the brink of collapse in the east •⁠ ⁠Why new U.S. sanctions might seriously hurt Russia’s economy •⁠ ⁠Whether China’s next move could decide how this war ends •⁠ ⁠And why the world may already be closer to a NATO-Russia clash than anyone admits Col. Davis says global power isn’t static anymore. The players are shifting, the weapons are changing, and the margin for error is shrinking fast.

Mario Nawfal

1,702,465 views • 10 months ago

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 FORMER CIA OFFICER: WHAT IS NEXT FOR TRUMP, THE GULF, AND IRAN Trump’s next move? Hard to say. Maybe he’s trying to strike a deal. Maybe he still wants to be the dealmaker and the peace guy, even if his Norway texts kind of hinted otherwise. The Gulf doesn’t want a civil war or a destabilized Iran, and Trump doesn’t want to upset them again after Qatar. Big question: Will the Gulf stick with U.S. bills or switch to gold, silver, and BRICS? Johnson says the latter. That could hold Trump back. Israel is pushing him too. But Trump won’t risk angering everyone at once. Johnson doesn’t think he’ll go for regime change. He’ll keep moving, but carefully. Full interview with Larry Johnson below

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 FORMER CIA OFFICER: WHAT IS NEXT FOR TRUMP, THE GULF, AND IRAN Trump’s next move? Hard to say. Maybe he’s trying to strike a deal. Maybe he still wants to be the dealmaker and the peace guy, even if his Norway texts kind of hinted otherwise. The Gulf doesn’t want a civil war or a destabilized Iran, and Trump doesn’t want to upset them again after Qatar. Big question: Will the Gulf stick with U.S. bills or switch to gold, silver, and BRICS? Johnson says the latter. That could hold Trump back. Israel is pushing him too. But Trump won’t risk angering everyone at once. Johnson doesn’t think he’ll go for regime change. He’ll keep moving, but carefully. Full interview with Larry Johnson below

Mario Nawfal

32,006 views • 7 months ago

🇺🇸 INTERVIEW: “THE NEXT ERA OF DOLLAR POWER COULD BE AMERICA’S RENAISSANCE” Luke Gromen, Macroeconomic Strategist “If the dollar’s dominance fades, it won’t be the end of America. It could actually trigger the biggest economic boom since the years after World War II. For forty years, dollar hegemony rewarded Wall Street and Washington while hollowing out America’s industrial base. We sent our factories overseas, and the working and middle class paid the price. The next era, what I call ‘Dollar Hegemony 3.0,’ reverses that trend. We’re bringing factories back, investing in domestic production, and rebuilding the U.S. defense and manufacturing base. As the dollar weakens, debts get easier to pay, inequality narrows, and America’s middle class starts to rise again. It’s a win for Main Street, even if it’s a loss for Treasury holders.”

🇺🇸 INTERVIEW: “THE NEXT ERA OF DOLLAR POWER COULD BE AMERICA’S RENAISSANCE” Luke Gromen, Macroeconomic Strategist “If the dollar’s dominance fades, it won’t be the end of America. It could actually trigger the biggest economic boom since the years after World War II. For forty years, dollar hegemony rewarded Wall Street and Washington while hollowing out America’s industrial base. We sent our factories overseas, and the working and middle class paid the price. The next era, what I call ‘Dollar Hegemony 3.0,’ reverses that trend. We’re bringing factories back, investing in domestic production, and rebuilding the U.S. defense and manufacturing base. As the dollar weakens, debts get easier to pay, inequality narrows, and America’s middle class starts to rise again. It’s a win for Main Street, even if it’s a loss for Treasury holders.”

Mario Nawfal

53,614 views • 9 months ago

🚨 TRUMP MUST CHOOSE BT TWO OPTIONS ON IRAN: 'Walk Away' or back to Major Combat Ops Joe Kent (Joe Kent) predicts a "big, bold and very Trumpian" move via the 'Walk Away' option by declaring victory through articulating a "highlight reel of everything that we've done in Iran" such as "destroyed their navy," and "taken out all their air defenses," and "set them back 20 years" on their nuclear program. The stakes for the Middle East conflict are rising every day the president delays chooding an option; if the U.S. resumes major operations, "Iran will be lit up" and we will know it unmistakable fashion - but that will not only fail to solve the problem, it will greatly compound them. With the Iran war at a crossroads, will the White House choose a narrative win or an all-out escalation that leaves the region "glowing"? Don’t miss this critical analysis of the only viable exit for the U.S. in this high-tension standoff. Watch the full breakdown on Daniel Davis Deep Dive! 👇 Watch the full breakdown on Daniel Davis Deep Dive! 👉 #IranWar #USStrategy #MiddleEastConflict #Trump #NationalSecurity #Geopolitics #DanielDavis #JoeKent #ForeignPolicy #BreakingNews #MilitaryStrategy

🚨 TRUMP MUST CHOOSE BT TWO OPTIONS ON IRAN: 'Walk Away' or back to Major Combat Ops Joe Kent (Joe Kent) predicts a "big, bold and very Trumpian" move via the 'Walk Away' option by declaring victory through articulating a "highlight reel of everything that we've done in Iran" such as "destroyed their navy," and "taken out all their air defenses," and "set them back 20 years" on their nuclear program. The stakes for the Middle East conflict are rising every day the president delays chooding an option; if the U.S. resumes major operations, "Iran will be lit up" and we will know it unmistakable fashion - but that will not only fail to solve the problem, it will greatly compound them. With the Iran war at a crossroads, will the White House choose a narrative win or an all-out escalation that leaves the region "glowing"? Don’t miss this critical analysis of the only viable exit for the U.S. in this high-tension standoff. Watch the full breakdown on Daniel Davis Deep Dive! 👇 Watch the full breakdown on Daniel Davis Deep Dive! 👉 #IranWar #USStrategy #MiddleEastConflict #Trump #NationalSecurity #Geopolitics #DanielDavis #JoeKent #ForeignPolicy #BreakingNews #MilitaryStrategy

Daniel Davis Deep Dive

36,696 views • 3 months ago

President Donald Trump issued a new threat against Iran on Wednesday, saying the U.S. would hit "very hard" if the country made a move for nuclear material. In a primetime address from the White House, Trump said the U.S. has obliterated Iran's nuclear sites, and that it "would take months to get near the nuclear dust." "If we see them make a move, even a move for it, we’ll hit them with missiles very hard again," Trump said. The president said the U.S. would hit Iran "extremely hard over the next two to three weeks." At other points of his address, he said the mission was “nearing completion,” and that discussions are ongoing. "We are going to bring them back to the Stone Ages, where they belong," he added. Polls have shown majorities of Americans oppose military action in Iran, and also oppose U.S. troops on the ground there. Gas prices have soared to over $4 a gallon, heightening Americans' economic concerns. Trump described the sticker shock as "temporary." "The United States has never been better prepared economically to confront this threat. You all know that," he said earlier in his remarks.

President Donald Trump issued a new threat against Iran on Wednesday, saying the U.S. would hit "very hard" if the country made a move for nuclear material. In a primetime address from the White House, Trump said the U.S. has obliterated Iran's nuclear sites, and that it "would take months to get near the nuclear dust." "If we see them make a move, even a move for it, we’ll hit them with missiles very hard again," Trump said. The president said the U.S. would hit Iran "extremely hard over the next two to three weeks." At other points of his address, he said the mission was “nearing completion,” and that discussions are ongoing. "We are going to bring them back to the Stone Ages, where they belong," he added. Polls have shown majorities of Americans oppose military action in Iran, and also oppose U.S. troops on the ground there. Gas prices have soared to over $4 a gallon, heightening Americans' economic concerns. Trump described the sticker shock as "temporary." "The United States has never been better prepared economically to confront this threat. You all know that," he said earlier in his remarks.

PBS News

33,019 views • 4 months ago

🇺🇸🇮🇷🇮🇱 INTERVIEW: TRUMP PREPARES FOR WAR WITH IRAN Former Army Colonel Daniel Davis is sounding the alarm: a major U.S. attack on Iran is “virtually certain”, and no one’s paying attention. A few weeks ago, everyone was waiting for airstrikes. Then the headlines moved on. But behind the scenes? Troops, tanks, warplanes, and even Delta Force have been moving into the region. Davis says Trump’s not bluffing. The goal? Not just a symbolic hit, but something much bigger: take out Iran’s leadership, crush their military, and maybe even end the regime altogether. Why risk all this? Daniel Davis Deep Dive says it's not about national security. It’s regime change. Just like Syria. Tear Iran apart, keep it weak, and walk away. The problem? That never ends well. 03:16 - Trump likely delayed Iran strike due to Netanyahu's request for more prep time 04:15 - U.S. may be preparing for a massive regional war, not just limited strikes 05:22 - If Iran sees war as existential, they may abandon self-restraint entirely 06:45 - U.S. bases in the region are less defended than Israel's Iron Dome system 07:58 - Iran likely won’t target Gulf cities—wants to avoid widening the war 09:48 - Could Iran’s Supreme Leader Khamenei be targeted in a decapitation strike? 11:12 - Iran now more prepared than during the 12-day war, no surprise possible 13:24 - Iran's missile production was moved underground and continues actively 15:21 - Delta Force capture mission like in Venezuela? Unlikely and dangerous 17:07 - Houthis and Hezbollah might rise if Iran inflicts serious damage on Israel 18:43 - Could an Iranian military success provoke an Israeli nuclear response? 20:54 - Civil war in Iran post-regime change could be worse than current regime 22:47 - Iran's ethnic diversity and separatist movements make regime change risky 24:30 - Israel may prefer chaos in Iran over a functioning successor regime 27:06 - As the world watches other crises, Ukraine quietly loses more ground 30:52 - Ukraine’s frontline collapse or grinding defeat both seem inevitable 33:45 - Europe is drifting from U.S. leadership, considering talks with Russia 36:17 - Trump might dare Europe over Greenland with a troop deployment bluff 38:09 - Trump’s behavior may be more irrational than strategic/cognitive decline? 40:03 - NATO’s future is crumbling, Europe IS preparing for post-U.S. security 43:31 - No real military or economic reason for U.S. to “take” Greenland 45:00 - Trump likely to escalate further: Iran war, Venezuela unrest, NATO collapse

🇺🇸🇮🇷🇮🇱 INTERVIEW: TRUMP PREPARES FOR WAR WITH IRAN Former Army Colonel Daniel Davis is sounding the alarm: a major U.S. attack on Iran is “virtually certain”, and no one’s paying attention. A few weeks ago, everyone was waiting for airstrikes. Then the headlines moved on. But behind the scenes? Troops, tanks, warplanes, and even Delta Force have been moving into the region. Davis says Trump’s not bluffing. The goal? Not just a symbolic hit, but something much bigger: take out Iran’s leadership, crush their military, and maybe even end the regime altogether. Why risk all this? Daniel Davis Deep Dive says it's not about national security. It’s regime change. Just like Syria. Tear Iran apart, keep it weak, and walk away. The problem? That never ends well. 03:16 - Trump likely delayed Iran strike due to Netanyahu's request for more prep time 04:15 - U.S. may be preparing for a massive regional war, not just limited strikes 05:22 - If Iran sees war as existential, they may abandon self-restraint entirely 06:45 - U.S. bases in the region are less defended than Israel's Iron Dome system 07:58 - Iran likely won’t target Gulf cities—wants to avoid widening the war 09:48 - Could Iran’s Supreme Leader Khamenei be targeted in a decapitation strike? 11:12 - Iran now more prepared than during the 12-day war, no surprise possible 13:24 - Iran's missile production was moved underground and continues actively 15:21 - Delta Force capture mission like in Venezuela? Unlikely and dangerous 17:07 - Houthis and Hezbollah might rise if Iran inflicts serious damage on Israel 18:43 - Could an Iranian military success provoke an Israeli nuclear response? 20:54 - Civil war in Iran post-regime change could be worse than current regime 22:47 - Iran's ethnic diversity and separatist movements make regime change risky 24:30 - Israel may prefer chaos in Iran over a functioning successor regime 27:06 - As the world watches other crises, Ukraine quietly loses more ground 30:52 - Ukraine’s frontline collapse or grinding defeat both seem inevitable 33:45 - Europe is drifting from U.S. leadership, considering talks with Russia 36:17 - Trump might dare Europe over Greenland with a troop deployment bluff 38:09 - Trump’s behavior may be more irrational than strategic/cognitive decline? 40:03 - NATO’s future is crumbling, Europe IS preparing for post-U.S. security 43:31 - No real military or economic reason for U.S. to “take” Greenland 45:00 - Trump likely to escalate further: Iran war, Venezuela unrest, NATO collapse

Mario Nawfal

1,910,543 views • 7 months ago

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 COLONEL DOUGLAS MACGREGOR: HOW IRAN COULD SHUT DOWN THE WORLD’S OIL Douglas explains why mining the Strait of Hormuz would be Iran’s absolute last resort: not because they can’t do it, but because it would detonate the global economy overnight. Hormuz isn’t just a waterway, it’s the world’s most critical oil chokepoint, and Iran has thousands of naval mines, including smart mines, that could turn it into a nightmare fast. Iran doesn’t need to mine the strait right away to exert control. Instead, they already have missiles and automated weapons buried deep in the cliffs surrounding Hormuz, giving them the ability to selectively target U.S.-flagged ships while allowing others, especially oil tankers headed to China and Asia, to pass through. If the U.S. tried to neutralize those systems, it would take time and effort, and only then would mining become the desperation move. And once mines enter Hormuz, they don’t just drift away, as currents trap them in the strait, creating floating death zones that are incredibly hard to clear. He also points out the geopolitical constraint: China depends on that oil, and Iran knows it. Which is why Hormuz is basically leverage held in reserve. This is about economic warfare, patience, and knowing when to threaten the one move that hurts everyone at once. Most people never think about Hormuz, until suddenly everything costs more. Full interview with Douglas Macgregor below.

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 COLONEL DOUGLAS MACGREGOR: HOW IRAN COULD SHUT DOWN THE WORLD’S OIL Douglas explains why mining the Strait of Hormuz would be Iran’s absolute last resort: not because they can’t do it, but because it would detonate the global economy overnight. Hormuz isn’t just a waterway, it’s the world’s most critical oil chokepoint, and Iran has thousands of naval mines, including smart mines, that could turn it into a nightmare fast. Iran doesn’t need to mine the strait right away to exert control. Instead, they already have missiles and automated weapons buried deep in the cliffs surrounding Hormuz, giving them the ability to selectively target U.S.-flagged ships while allowing others, especially oil tankers headed to China and Asia, to pass through. If the U.S. tried to neutralize those systems, it would take time and effort, and only then would mining become the desperation move. And once mines enter Hormuz, they don’t just drift away, as currents trap them in the strait, creating floating death zones that are incredibly hard to clear. He also points out the geopolitical constraint: China depends on that oil, and Iran knows it. Which is why Hormuz is basically leverage held in reserve. This is about economic warfare, patience, and knowing when to threaten the one move that hurts everyone at once. Most people never think about Hormuz, until suddenly everything costs more. Full interview with Douglas Macgregor below.

Mario Nawfal

28,153 views • 6 months ago

🚨🇺🇸🇻🇪🇨🇳 CHINA ACCUSES U.S. OF STEALING ITS OIL AFTER TRUMP DIVERTS VENEZUELAN CRUDE TO AMERICA China is livid, and they’re not hiding it. After Trump announced the U.S. will refine and sell up to 50 million barrels of Venezuelan oil previously frozen under sanctions, Beijing fired back, calling the move a blatant power grab and a direct hit on their interests. Why? Because that oil wasn’t just sitting there, China had already paid for a big chunk of it, through loan-for-oil deals and state-backed agreements with Maduro’s regime. Trump’s plan? Ignore all that, break the blockade, grab the barrels, and reroute them to U.S. refineries. The pitch: American energy security, because the U.S. is in charge now. This is also about who gets to call the shots in Venezuela post-Maduro, and right now, Beijing just got boxed out while Washington takes over the chessboard. It’s a high-stakes geopolitical standoff over energy, influence, and who controls Latin America’s future. China just lost billions in oil access, but the U.S. just cashed in. Source: Reuters

🚨🇺🇸🇻🇪🇨🇳 CHINA ACCUSES U.S. OF STEALING ITS OIL AFTER TRUMP DIVERTS VENEZUELAN CRUDE TO AMERICA China is livid, and they’re not hiding it. After Trump announced the U.S. will refine and sell up to 50 million barrels of Venezuelan oil previously frozen under sanctions, Beijing fired back, calling the move a blatant power grab and a direct hit on their interests. Why? Because that oil wasn’t just sitting there, China had already paid for a big chunk of it, through loan-for-oil deals and state-backed agreements with Maduro’s regime. Trump’s plan? Ignore all that, break the blockade, grab the barrels, and reroute them to U.S. refineries. The pitch: American energy security, because the U.S. is in charge now. This is also about who gets to call the shots in Venezuela post-Maduro, and right now, Beijing just got boxed out while Washington takes over the chessboard. It’s a high-stakes geopolitical standoff over energy, influence, and who controls Latin America’s future. China just lost billions in oil access, but the U.S. just cashed in. Source: Reuters

Mario Nawfal

2,227,692 views • 7 months ago

🚨🇺🇦🇷🇺 INTERVIEW: "YOU CAN'T ARM UKRAINE TO KILL RUSSIANS, THEN ACT SHOCKED WHEN RUSSIA HITS BACK" Colonel Daniel Davis Deep Dive calls out what he sees as Western hypocrisy: NATO countries are funding operations to destroy Russian forces on the battlefield, then expressing outrage when Moscow retaliates with sabotage and drone strikes across Europe. Did they really think Russia wouldn't respond? "We talk about how 'Oh my gosh, look what Russia is doing', and they're bad guys because they're doing this stuff. How can we be surprised? Because all of these European countries, every one of them are supporting operations to kill Russians on the battlefield. Why would anybody think that the Russians would do nothing in response to that? If we don't want that kind of activity, then we can't be literally supporting the destruction and the killing of Russian troops on a battlefield. If you want to do that, that's a policy decision that can be made, but don't be surprised when there's a counteraction."

🚨🇺🇦🇷🇺 INTERVIEW: "YOU CAN'T ARM UKRAINE TO KILL RUSSIANS, THEN ACT SHOCKED WHEN RUSSIA HITS BACK" Colonel Daniel Davis Deep Dive calls out what he sees as Western hypocrisy: NATO countries are funding operations to destroy Russian forces on the battlefield, then expressing outrage when Moscow retaliates with sabotage and drone strikes across Europe. Did they really think Russia wouldn't respond? "We talk about how 'Oh my gosh, look what Russia is doing', and they're bad guys because they're doing this stuff. How can we be surprised? Because all of these European countries, every one of them are supporting operations to kill Russians on the battlefield. Why would anybody think that the Russians would do nothing in response to that? If we don't want that kind of activity, then we can't be literally supporting the destruction and the killing of Russian troops on a battlefield. If you want to do that, that's a policy decision that can be made, but don't be surprised when there's a counteraction."

Mario Nawfal

20,371 views • 8 months ago

❗️❗️❗️🇺🇸 Donald Trump: 📌 “It’s a big day in Iran. Many targets we’ve been hunting for a long time have been destroyed by our great military — the best and most powerful force in the world.” 🇺🇸🛢️ Trump also said he is interested in “taking oil from Iran”, hinting that the U.S. could target Kharg Island, a key hub of Iran’s oil exports. ▪️ “To be honest, my favorite thing is taking oil… we might take Kharg Island, or maybe not. We have many options.” ▪️ He added that the U.S. has struck thousands of targets, claiming around 13,000 have already been hit, with about 3,000 remaining. 📌 “There have already been two ‘regime changes’ in Iran — both ended with their members blown up. The third one is very smart.” 📌 “I would just say the negotiations are going very well. But with Iran, you never know — we negotiate, and then we end up blowing them up.” 📣 🇨🇺 Trump reiterated that after Iran, “Cuba could be next,” calling it a “failed country” and saying the U.S. would be there to assist once it collapses. See the latest updates with us: NSTRIKE

❗️❗️❗️🇺🇸 Donald Trump: 📌 “It’s a big day in Iran. Many targets we’ve been hunting for a long time have been destroyed by our great military — the best and most powerful force in the world.” 🇺🇸🛢️ Trump also said he is interested in “taking oil from Iran”, hinting that the U.S. could target Kharg Island, a key hub of Iran’s oil exports. ▪️ “To be honest, my favorite thing is taking oil… we might take Kharg Island, or maybe not. We have many options.” ▪️ He added that the U.S. has struck thousands of targets, claiming around 13,000 have already been hit, with about 3,000 remaining. 📌 “There have already been two ‘regime changes’ in Iran — both ended with their members blown up. The third one is very smart.” 📌 “I would just say the negotiations are going very well. But with Iran, you never know — we negotiate, and then we end up blowing them up.” 📣 🇨🇺 Trump reiterated that after Iran, “Cuba could be next,” calling it a “failed country” and saying the U.S. would be there to assist once it collapses. See the latest updates with us: NSTRIKE

NSTRIKE

12,562 views • 5 months ago

🔥Iran just forced a new reality on Washington: Concede to Our Terms in the MoU and Stop Threatening Us - or We will Strike Back Harder Pascal Lottaz (Pascal Lottaz) breaks it down a reality Washington can no longer ignore: "Even if you nuke us, we can still kill Israel and we will... So don't test us." Iran has made clear it can wipe out “80% of the drinking water” of Israel by striking their desalination plants — “The Iranians can strike Dimona and poison the entire region." This is why, he says, the U.S. military establishment finally understood Iran had “reestablished reciprocity” of military capacity; Iran HAS the ability to hit our side as hard as we can hit their side. That's new to the United States; we have had near unchallenged hegemony in owning the escalation risk, because America could always hit the other side harder than they could hit us. Until now. This shift explains why negotiations are happening despite hawks like Lindsey Graham raging at the loss of unchallenged dominance. Iran is prepared to absorb punishment and strike back hard - and they have the capacity to do both. Watch the full eye-opening clip from the latest Daniel Davis Deep Dive now: 🏷️#Iran #USStrategy #MiddleEast #StraitOfHormuz #DanielDavis #PascalLottaz #IranIsrael #NuclearDeterrence #Geopolitics #ForeignPolicy #Trump #Reciprocity

🔥Iran just forced a new reality on Washington: Concede to Our Terms in the MoU and Stop Threatening Us - or We will Strike Back Harder Pascal Lottaz (Pascal Lottaz) breaks it down a reality Washington can no longer ignore: "Even if you nuke us, we can still kill Israel and we will... So don't test us." Iran has made clear it can wipe out “80% of the drinking water” of Israel by striking their desalination plants — “The Iranians can strike Dimona and poison the entire region." This is why, he says, the U.S. military establishment finally understood Iran had “reestablished reciprocity” of military capacity; Iran HAS the ability to hit our side as hard as we can hit their side. That's new to the United States; we have had near unchallenged hegemony in owning the escalation risk, because America could always hit the other side harder than they could hit us. Until now. This shift explains why negotiations are happening despite hawks like Lindsey Graham raging at the loss of unchallenged dominance. Iran is prepared to absorb punishment and strike back hard - and they have the capacity to do both. Watch the full eye-opening clip from the latest Daniel Davis Deep Dive now: 🏷️#Iran #USStrategy #MiddleEast #StraitOfHormuz #DanielDavis #PascalLottaz #IranIsrael #NuclearDeterrence #Geopolitics #ForeignPolicy #Trump #Reciprocity

Daniel Davis Deep Dive

23,606 views • 2 months ago

🚨 Scott Jennings just delivered a DEVASTATING reality check to the CNN panel about why NATO should care about the Iran conflict. The Democrats on the panel hated every second of Scott Jennings exposing the ugly reality of the relationship. JENNINGS: “You know why NATO should care about this?” “It was just a couple of weeks ago that we learned that Iran has ballistic missile capabilities that can reach most of Europe.” “On top of that, does no one else here find it agitating that we spend billions and trillions of dollars over decades.” “We have U.S. Troops stationed in all these bases with all these allies.” “And then when we decide that we need to do something that is in our national security interest, you have supposed friends of the United States saying you can’t use these bases.” “We’re not going to permit this. We’re not going to help you on that.” “It is AGITATING. It is agitating.” “But bottom line, why doesn’t Europe look at this ballistic missile threat a little more seriously?” “That’s what I wonder.”

🚨 Scott Jennings just delivered a DEVASTATING reality check to the CNN panel about why NATO should care about the Iran conflict. The Democrats on the panel hated every second of Scott Jennings exposing the ugly reality of the relationship. JENNINGS: “You know why NATO should care about this?” “It was just a couple of weeks ago that we learned that Iran has ballistic missile capabilities that can reach most of Europe.” “On top of that, does no one else here find it agitating that we spend billions and trillions of dollars over decades.” “We have U.S. Troops stationed in all these bases with all these allies.” “And then when we decide that we need to do something that is in our national security interest, you have supposed friends of the United States saying you can’t use these bases.” “We’re not going to permit this. We’re not going to help you on that.” “It is AGITATING. It is agitating.” “But bottom line, why doesn’t Europe look at this ballistic missile threat a little more seriously?” “That’s what I wonder.”

Overton

64,602 views • 4 months ago

🚨 JUST IN: New leaked details are reportedly revealing more about President Trump’s U.S.-Iran peace deal, and the picture is becoming very clear: 47 is not trying to give Iran another weak Obama-style handshake, he is trying to build a deal that takes away nuclear leverage, calms the region, reopens critical routes, and keeps America out of another endless Middle East disaster. This is why the old foreign policy crowd is panicking. They spent years telling Americans that weakness was diplomacy, that paying off enemies was strategy, and that letting Iran drag the world from crisis to crisis was somehow “stability.” Trump is moving differently. He is using pressure, leverage, timing, allies, and direct negotiation to force a result instead of managing the same problem forever. The details still matter, enforcement matters even more, and nobody should trust Iran without verification, but if this deal removes nuclear material, stops escalation, protects Israel, and brings the Strait of Hormuz back under control, then this could become one of the biggest peace-through-strength wins of Trump’s presidency. No blind trust. No weak surrender. No Obama repeat. Trump is trying to bring it home. 🇺🇸

🚨 JUST IN: New leaked details are reportedly revealing more about President Trump’s U.S.-Iran peace deal, and the picture is becoming very clear: 47 is not trying to give Iran another weak Obama-style handshake, he is trying to build a deal that takes away nuclear leverage, calms the region, reopens critical routes, and keeps America out of another endless Middle East disaster. This is why the old foreign policy crowd is panicking. They spent years telling Americans that weakness was diplomacy, that paying off enemies was strategy, and that letting Iran drag the world from crisis to crisis was somehow “stability.” Trump is moving differently. He is using pressure, leverage, timing, allies, and direct negotiation to force a result instead of managing the same problem forever. The details still matter, enforcement matters even more, and nobody should trust Iran without verification, but if this deal removes nuclear material, stops escalation, protects Israel, and brings the Strait of Hormuz back under control, then this could become one of the biggest peace-through-strength wins of Trump’s presidency. No blind trust. No weak surrender. No Obama repeat. Trump is trying to bring it home. 🇺🇸

ⁿᵉʷˢ Barron Trump 🇺🇸

710,558 views • 2 months ago

$🚨 BREAKING: NATO AT A CROSSROADS — “WHY ARE WE IN IT?” A major shift is now being signalled from Washington. The United States is openly questioning the value of its long-standing alliance with Europe — raising the prospect of troop withdrawals, reduced commitments, and a full strategic reassessment. Rubio’s message is direct: If American forces cannot use allied bases in times of need, then the foundation of the alliance itself must be questioned. For decades, the arrangement has been clear: The U.S. provides the bulk of military strength, funding, and deterrence across Europe. Now that model is being challenged. Key questions now emerging: • Has NATO become a one-sided security arrangement? • Is Europe relying too heavily on American protection? • What happens if the U.S. begins to step back? This is not routine political rhetoric. It signals a potential restructuring of global power dynamics — one that could redefine defence, diplomacy, and security across the Western world. The post-war alliance system is being tested. What comes next will determine whether NATO adapts — or begins to fracture.$

🚨 BREAKING: NATO AT A CROSSROADS — “WHY ARE WE IN IT?” A major shift is now being signalled from Washington. The United States is openly questioning the value of its long-standing alliance with Europe — raising the prospect of troop withdrawals, reduced commitments, and a full strategic reassessment. Rubio’s message is direct: If American forces cannot use allied bases in times of need, then the foundation of the alliance itself must be questioned. For decades, the arrangement has been clear: The U.S. provides the bulk of military strength, funding, and deterrence across Europe. Now that model is being challenged. Key questions now emerging: • Has NATO become a one-sided security arrangement? • Is Europe relying too heavily on American protection? • What happens if the U.S. begins to step back? This is not routine political rhetoric. It signals a potential restructuring of global power dynamics — one that could redefine defence, diplomacy, and security across the Western world. The post-war alliance system is being tested. What comes next will determine whether NATO adapts — or begins to fracture.

Jim Ferguson

29,888 views • 3 months ago