Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

🇺🇸🇮🇷🇮🇱 INTERVIEW: TRUMP PREPARES FOR WAR WITH IRAN Former Army Colonel Daniel Davis is sounding the alarm: a major U.S. attack on Iran is “virtually certain”, and no one’s paying attention. A few weeks ago, everyone was waiting for airstrikes. Then the headlines moved on. But behind the scenes?...

MarioNawfal's profile picture

Mario Nawfal

3,559,866 subscribers

1,909,932 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политикаЗдоровье и велнесОбразование
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🇮🇷 EMERGENCY INTERVIEW: U.S. TO STRIKE IRAN - WHAT COMES NEXT It’s almost definite now, Trump is planning to strike Iran. The only question is: What’s his objective? Is it a complete regime change, or a Venezuela-like goal to replace the Supreme Leader with a more lenient member of the same regime? If it’s the former, then Iran, and the region, are in deep trouble. My guest today, Quincy Institute’s Trita Parsi, escaped Iran during the 1979 revolution, and his family has been targeted and jailed by both the current regime and the previous Monarchy. He breaks down the repercussions of a regime change, how Iran will retaliate to U.S. strikes, and the increasing risk of a civil was in the country. He also makes a very interesting point: Iran is at the mercy of Israeli ambitions (the destruction of the current regime and the country’s military capabilities) and American/Gulf ambitions (a stable regime with possibly a new leader more friendly to the West). I enjoyed this interview as Trita, an expert in the region, does not take sides. He’s very critical of the current regime, not a fan of the previous one, and thinks any American strikes on the country could have devastating consequences. We both agreed: The current regime is terrible, but a regime change may end up being worse if not executed properly and carefully. 03:25 – The protests in Iran were not the trigger for war planning; if anything, they delayed it. 04:02 – The original justification for attacking Iran came from Israeli concerns over missile threats, not internal unrest. 06:41 – The roots of Iran's current instability lie in sanctions that intentionally devastated the middle class. 09:16 – Some Iranians now view outside military intervention as the only path to regime change due to desperation. 11:32 – Gulf states are alarmed by Israeli aggression and fear instability from regime collapse, despite opposing Iran. 14:13 – A power vacuum in Iran could lead to civil war, refugee flows, and wider regional destabilization. 17:24 – Saudi, Turkey, and Pakistan may be quietly forming a bloc to counterbalance Israeli hegemony in the region. 20:11 – Iran’s fractured opposition lacks strength partly because sanctions crushed the middle class that fuels reform. 23:17 – Reza Pahlavi has grown closer to Israel, leading to division and backlash within the exile opposition. 25:07 – Monarchist support in Iran is hard to quantify—some chants back him, others reject him outright. 26:09 – Pahlavi says he wants democracy, but critics argue his conduct and followers cast doubt on that claim. 31:50 – Trita Parsi’s family fled Iran before the revolution; both the Shah and the Islamic Republic persecuted them. 34:24 – Iran’s internet blackout has cut off communications, and exact casualty numbers remain unclear. 37:10 – Hundreds of regime security forces have also been killed, suggesting an unprecedented level of resistance. 39:42 – Kurdish separatist groups may be exploiting the unrest, but aren't representative of the broader protest movement. 43:32 – Israel may see Iran’s total collapse as a strategic goal, even if it causes long-term regional chaos. 45:28 – Sanctions have historically made democratic transitions harder by weakening civil society more than regimes. 47:16 – US interests differ from Israel’s: Washington may want regime change, but not a failed or fragmented state. 50:23 – A Maduro-style solution could be attempted, but unlike Venezuela, the US has fewer internal contacts in Iran. 51:39 – Israel may push for not just regime change but destruction of Iran’s entire military infrastructure.
1:00:43

🇮🇷 EMERGENCY INTERVIEW: U.S. TO STRIKE IRAN - WHAT COMES NEXT It’s almost definite now, Trump is planning to strike Iran. The only question is: What’s his objective? Is it a complete regime change, or a Venezuela-like goal to replace the Supreme Leader with a more lenient member of the same regime? If it’s the former, then Iran, and the region, are in deep trouble. My guest today, Quincy Institute’s Trita Parsi, escaped Iran during the 1979 revolution, and his family has been targeted and jailed by both the current regime and the previous Monarchy. He breaks down the repercussions of a regime change, how Iran will retaliate to U.S. strikes, and the increasing risk of a civil was in the country. He also makes a very interesting point: Iran is at the mercy of Israeli ambitions (the destruction of the current regime and the country’s military capabilities) and American/Gulf ambitions (a stable regime with possibly a new leader more friendly to the West). I enjoyed this interview as Trita, an expert in the region, does not take sides. He’s very critical of the current regime, not a fan of the previous one, and thinks any American strikes on the country could have devastating consequences. We both agreed: The current regime is terrible, but a regime change may end up being worse if not executed properly and carefully. 03:25 – The protests in Iran were not the trigger for war planning; if anything, they delayed it. 04:02 – The original justification for attacking Iran came from Israeli concerns over missile threats, not internal unrest. 06:41 – The roots of Iran's current instability lie in sanctions that intentionally devastated the middle class. 09:16 – Some Iranians now view outside military intervention as the only path to regime change due to desperation. 11:32 – Gulf states are alarmed by Israeli aggression and fear instability from regime collapse, despite opposing Iran. 14:13 – A power vacuum in Iran could lead to civil war, refugee flows, and wider regional destabilization. 17:24 – Saudi, Turkey, and Pakistan may be quietly forming a bloc to counterbalance Israeli hegemony in the region. 20:11 – Iran’s fractured opposition lacks strength partly because sanctions crushed the middle class that fuels reform. 23:17 – Reza Pahlavi has grown closer to Israel, leading to division and backlash within the exile opposition. 25:07 – Monarchist support in Iran is hard to quantify—some chants back him, others reject him outright. 26:09 – Pahlavi says he wants democracy, but critics argue his conduct and followers cast doubt on that claim. 31:50 – Trita Parsi’s family fled Iran before the revolution; both the Shah and the Islamic Republic persecuted them. 34:24 – Iran’s internet blackout has cut off communications, and exact casualty numbers remain unclear. 37:10 – Hundreds of regime security forces have also been killed, suggesting an unprecedented level of resistance. 39:42 – Kurdish separatist groups may be exploiting the unrest, but aren't representative of the broader protest movement. 43:32 – Israel may see Iran’s total collapse as a strategic goal, even if it causes long-term regional chaos. 45:28 – Sanctions have historically made democratic transitions harder by weakening civil society more than regimes. 47:16 – US interests differ from Israel’s: Washington may want regime change, but not a failed or fragmented state. 50:23 – A Maduro-style solution could be attempted, but unlike Venezuela, the US has fewer internal contacts in Iran. 51:39 – Israel may push for not just regime change but destruction of Iran’s entire military infrastructure.

Mario Nawfal

3,979,356 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

🚨 INTERVIEW: COL. MACGREGOR ON HOW A WAR WITH IRAN COULD LOOK LIKE Why didn’t Trump strike Iran last month? Was it Israeli unpreparedness, pressure from the Gulf, or his military advisors warning the U.S. isn’t ready for war? With a military buildup still underway in the region, a U.S. strike remains likely. So how would Iran retaliate? Hired by Trump as senior advisor to the Acting Secretary of Defense, Macgregor warns Iran’s capabilities now far exceed what they were during his time in the military and during the 12-day war, as Putin and Xi have heavily armed the country in recent months. Iran’s small diesel submarines (perfect for the shallow waters of the Persian Gulf), thousands of naval mines, and a large stockpile of missiles and mobile batteries hidden in mountainous terrain make the war a nightmare for the U.S., the region, and even the global economy. Subs and mines could shut down the crucial Strait of Hormuz, triggering a global oil crisis. Iran’s ballistic missiles could overwhelm U.S. defenses in the region, including the USS Abraham Lincoln. And while the war rages, China, Russia, and even Turkey may not sit idle. That could turn the conflict regional and further drain American munition stockpiles. 03:28 - Venezuela oil companies reluctant to operate, turning to mercenaries for protection 04:07 - Discussion on Trump's “secret weapon” and air defense disruption claims 04:54 - Iran protests brutally suppressed; airstrike plans reportedly halted 06:13 - Mossad, CIA, MI6 involvement escalated protests into potential regime change 07:20 - U.S. military assembling additional forces; air campaign planning underway 08:27 - Air Force poised for sustained bombing campaign; Navy limited by missile stock 09:54 - Iran’s missile and air capabilities now stronger than in 2020 11:16 - Russian and Chinese assistance improving Iran’s integrated air defenses 12:33 - Questions on Iran’s long-range missile reach and potential threats 14:03 - U.S. negotiating with Iran while signaling military readiness 15:21 - Assets in the region underestimated; more military presence deployed 16:05 - Iran refuses to negotiate missile program limitations 17:11 - Differences between previous air campaign and current potential operations 18:30 - Objective of U.S./Israel air campaign: destabilize Iranian state 19:57 - Turkey’s position as regional wildcard in potential Iranian conflict 22:12 - NATO’s limited role; European militaries unable to influence outcomes 25:37 - Iran’s drone swarm and naval capabilities assessed; U.S. preparedness discussed 28:32 - Iran could mine Strait of Hormuz as last resort; Chinese support mitigates impact 32:33 - Russia and China potential intervention if Iran regime collapses 36:30 - Iran strike consequences for Ukraine and Taiwan; U.S. and NATO credibility questioned 39:35 - Taiwan strategic assessment; Trump’s view aligns with non-intervention
40:28

🚨 INTERVIEW: COL. MACGREGOR ON HOW A WAR WITH IRAN COULD LOOK LIKE Why didn’t Trump strike Iran last month? Was it Israeli unpreparedness, pressure from the Gulf, or his military advisors warning the U.S. isn’t ready for war? With a military buildup still underway in the region, a U.S. strike remains likely. So how would Iran retaliate? Hired by Trump as senior advisor to the Acting Secretary of Defense, Macgregor warns Iran’s capabilities now far exceed what they were during his time in the military and during the 12-day war, as Putin and Xi have heavily armed the country in recent months. Iran’s small diesel submarines (perfect for the shallow waters of the Persian Gulf), thousands of naval mines, and a large stockpile of missiles and mobile batteries hidden in mountainous terrain make the war a nightmare for the U.S., the region, and even the global economy. Subs and mines could shut down the crucial Strait of Hormuz, triggering a global oil crisis. Iran’s ballistic missiles could overwhelm U.S. defenses in the region, including the USS Abraham Lincoln. And while the war rages, China, Russia, and even Turkey may not sit idle. That could turn the conflict regional and further drain American munition stockpiles. 03:28 - Venezuela oil companies reluctant to operate, turning to mercenaries for protection 04:07 - Discussion on Trump's “secret weapon” and air defense disruption claims 04:54 - Iran protests brutally suppressed; airstrike plans reportedly halted 06:13 - Mossad, CIA, MI6 involvement escalated protests into potential regime change 07:20 - U.S. military assembling additional forces; air campaign planning underway 08:27 - Air Force poised for sustained bombing campaign; Navy limited by missile stock 09:54 - Iran’s missile and air capabilities now stronger than in 2020 11:16 - Russian and Chinese assistance improving Iran’s integrated air defenses 12:33 - Questions on Iran’s long-range missile reach and potential threats 14:03 - U.S. negotiating with Iran while signaling military readiness 15:21 - Assets in the region underestimated; more military presence deployed 16:05 - Iran refuses to negotiate missile program limitations 17:11 - Differences between previous air campaign and current potential operations 18:30 - Objective of U.S./Israel air campaign: destabilize Iranian state 19:57 - Turkey’s position as regional wildcard in potential Iranian conflict 22:12 - NATO’s limited role; European militaries unable to influence outcomes 25:37 - Iran’s drone swarm and naval capabilities assessed; U.S. preparedness discussed 28:32 - Iran could mine Strait of Hormuz as last resort; Chinese support mitigates impact 32:33 - Russia and China potential intervention if Iran regime collapses 36:30 - Iran strike consequences for Ukraine and Taiwan; U.S. and NATO credibility questioned 39:35 - Taiwan strategic assessment; Trump’s view aligns with non-intervention

Mario Nawfal

2,125,742 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 Tehran University Professor Foad Izadi explains to me what Iranians are seeking in a post-war region He says Iran will never be a friend of the UAE as long as Dubai is close to Israel. There is no path in which Iran does not charge a fee at the Strait of Hormuz. He believes U.S. military bases must leave the region. The Islamic Republic of Iran believes the U.S empire is overstretched, Israel’s days of dominance are coming to an end, the Gulf monarchies are divided, and the global order is fragmenting fast enough for Tehran to outlast all of them. فواد ایزدی Foad Izadi 00:07 China Quietly Accepted Iran’s Hormuz Toll Plan 02:55 Iran Says It Survived Full-Force U.S.-Israeli Attacks 04:50 Iran Refuses To Return To The Pre-War Status Quo 07:06 The Strait Of Hormuz Is No Longer Negotiable 08:24 Iran Says U.S. Ships Won’t Be Welcome In Hormuz 09:37 Iran Wants The World To Pay To Pass Through Hormuz 10:44 Iran Calls The U.S. Navy Pirates 12:03 Iran Says Hormuz Fees Could Last Forever 14:04 China And Russia Reportedly Agreed To Pay Iran 16:25 Iran Is No Longer Afraid Of War 21:11 The West Makes More Money From Middle East Oil Than The Gulf 25:24 Iran Wants To End American Influence In The Middle East 31:36 Iran Warns Gulf States Over Israel Ties 34:48 Iran Vows To Make The UAE ‘Israel-Free’
44:16

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 Tehran University Professor Foad Izadi explains to me what Iranians are seeking in a post-war region He says Iran will never be a friend of the UAE as long as Dubai is close to Israel. There is no path in which Iran does not charge a fee at the Strait of Hormuz. He believes U.S. military bases must leave the region. The Islamic Republic of Iran believes the U.S empire is overstretched, Israel’s days of dominance are coming to an end, the Gulf monarchies are divided, and the global order is fragmenting fast enough for Tehran to outlast all of them. فواد ایزدی Foad Izadi 00:07 China Quietly Accepted Iran’s Hormuz Toll Plan 02:55 Iran Says It Survived Full-Force U.S.-Israeli Attacks 04:50 Iran Refuses To Return To The Pre-War Status Quo 07:06 The Strait Of Hormuz Is No Longer Negotiable 08:24 Iran Says U.S. Ships Won’t Be Welcome In Hormuz 09:37 Iran Wants The World To Pay To Pass Through Hormuz 10:44 Iran Calls The U.S. Navy Pirates 12:03 Iran Says Hormuz Fees Could Last Forever 14:04 China And Russia Reportedly Agreed To Pay Iran 16:25 Iran Is No Longer Afraid Of War 21:11 The West Makes More Money From Middle East Oil Than The Gulf 25:24 Iran Wants To End American Influence In The Middle East 31:36 Iran Warns Gulf States Over Israel Ties 34:48 Iran Vows To Make The UAE ‘Israel-Free’

Mario Nawfal

404,820 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Will There Be Regime Change in Iran or are we moving towards World War 3? ✅ Iran’s Defence Minister Amir Nasirzadeh is reportedly killed in Israeli strikes along with a senior IRGC commander, marking a direct hit on Iran’s top military leadership and sharply escalating tensions. ✅ Saudi Arabia and Qatar are joining the United States against Iran, signalling a broader regional alignment beyond just Israel–Iran tensions. ✅ The countries involved now include the U.S., Israel, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, UAE, Bahrain, Kuwait and Iraq. Power blocs are clearly forming, while Russia and China are closely observing the situation. If the U.S. pushes for regime change like it did in Iraq, it may attempt to remove Iran’s leadership and install a puppet government. That could trigger internal instability and long-term chaos. If Iran responds by expanding attacks or disrupting oil routes like the Strait of Hormuz, global markets will feel the shock. And if major powers such as Russia or China get directly involved, the conflict could grow beyond the region and might convert into world war 3!!!
2:50

Will There Be Regime Change in Iran or are we moving towards World War 3? ✅ Iran’s Defence Minister Amir Nasirzadeh is reportedly killed in Israeli strikes along with a senior IRGC commander, marking a direct hit on Iran’s top military leadership and sharply escalating tensions. ✅ Saudi Arabia and Qatar are joining the United States against Iran, signalling a broader regional alignment beyond just Israel–Iran tensions. ✅ The countries involved now include the U.S., Israel, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, UAE, Bahrain, Kuwait and Iraq. Power blocs are clearly forming, while Russia and China are closely observing the situation. If the U.S. pushes for regime change like it did in Iraq, it may attempt to remove Iran’s leadership and install a puppet government. That could trigger internal instability and long-term chaos. If Iran responds by expanding attacks or disrupting oil routes like the Strait of Hormuz, global markets will feel the shock. And if major powers such as Russia or China get directly involved, the conflict could grow beyond the region and might convert into world war 3!!!

Praffulgarg

34,767 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🇺🇸🇮🇷 INTERVIEW: HEATED DEBATE ON WHETHER THE U.S. SHOULD STRIKE IRAN Tensions are rising fast, military options are on the table, and the debate over deterrence versus escalation is reaching a boiling point. NYT Best Seller Joel Rosenberg argues Iran has spent decades funding armed proxy groups that kill Americans and U.S. allies, says diplomacy has failed, and supports a large but limited strike to punish the regime without triggering full-scale war. He frames military action as necessary to protect U.S. credibility, allies in the region, and to stop Iran’s missile capabilities from growing unchecked. Prof. Glenn Diesen rejects that outright, warning any strike would escalate the conflict, push Iran toward nuclear deterrence, and risk a regional war driven by security competition. Glenn accuses Washington of ignoring Iran’s security concerns, while Joel fires back that Glenn is excusing one of the world’s most brutal regimes. Enjoy this conversation with Glenn Diesen and Joel C. Rosenberg 01:15 - Should the U.S. attack Iran? Trump’s 3 options. 02:53 - Prediction: Trump will choose a “large but limited strike.” 03:41 - Regime change via air power alone: Practical military limitations vs political goals. 06:48 - Ethnic fragmentation risks of Iranian regime collapse. 07:31 - Iran would respond “all out” to any strike. 10:42 - Who started hostilities? 1953 coup vs embassy takeover. 12:35 - Failures of past U.S. interventions (Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan). 15:49 - Does Iran need to be an enemy of the U.S.? 16:05 - Israel, Iran, the U.S., and targeting. 20:34 - Were Iraq/Afghanistan “successful”? Success vs moral cost. 23:05 - Is the U.S. the problem? 28:15 - Nuclear facilities strike vs diplomacy argument. 32:54 - Ballistic missiles vs nuclear weapons as the real threat. 38:21 - Is Israel a threat to Gulf Nations? 45:54 - Israeli Foreign Policy, Law, and its ties to Arabs and Iran. 57:48 - End-of-year predictions for Iran and regional escalation.
1:04:08

🇺🇸🇮🇷 INTERVIEW: HEATED DEBATE ON WHETHER THE U.S. SHOULD STRIKE IRAN Tensions are rising fast, military options are on the table, and the debate over deterrence versus escalation is reaching a boiling point. NYT Best Seller Joel Rosenberg argues Iran has spent decades funding armed proxy groups that kill Americans and U.S. allies, says diplomacy has failed, and supports a large but limited strike to punish the regime without triggering full-scale war. He frames military action as necessary to protect U.S. credibility, allies in the region, and to stop Iran’s missile capabilities from growing unchecked. Prof. Glenn Diesen rejects that outright, warning any strike would escalate the conflict, push Iran toward nuclear deterrence, and risk a regional war driven by security competition. Glenn accuses Washington of ignoring Iran’s security concerns, while Joel fires back that Glenn is excusing one of the world’s most brutal regimes. Enjoy this conversation with Glenn Diesen and Joel C. Rosenberg 01:15 - Should the U.S. attack Iran? Trump’s 3 options. 02:53 - Prediction: Trump will choose a “large but limited strike.” 03:41 - Regime change via air power alone: Practical military limitations vs political goals. 06:48 - Ethnic fragmentation risks of Iranian regime collapse. 07:31 - Iran would respond “all out” to any strike. 10:42 - Who started hostilities? 1953 coup vs embassy takeover. 12:35 - Failures of past U.S. interventions (Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan). 15:49 - Does Iran need to be an enemy of the U.S.? 16:05 - Israel, Iran, the U.S., and targeting. 20:34 - Were Iraq/Afghanistan “successful”? Success vs moral cost. 23:05 - Is the U.S. the problem? 28:15 - Nuclear facilities strike vs diplomacy argument. 32:54 - Ballistic missiles vs nuclear weapons as the real threat. 38:21 - Is Israel a threat to Gulf Nations? 45:54 - Israeli Foreign Policy, Law, and its ties to Arabs and Iran. 57:48 - End-of-year predictions for Iran and regional escalation.

Mario Nawfal

1,798,098 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🚨🇮🇷 PBD INTERVIEW: WILL TRUMP STRIKE IRAN? WILL THE REGIME FALL? Patrick Bet-David’s family fled Iran when he was a child. He’s been an avid supporter of the previous Shah, and a critic of the current regime However he has reservations of opposition leader Reza Pahlavi, and worries any U.S. strikes on the country could destabilize the region He rightly points out that the real challenge comes after the regime falls. Rebuilding Iran will be brutal, messy, and unforgiving, but avoiding it isn’t an option either. We get into: * Why negotiations with Khamenei’s leadership are a dead end * What a post-regime Iran would realistically look like * How the U.S. could influence outcomes without owning another war * And why the hardest part of Iran’s future starts after the fighting stops 03:03 - Regime's delay tactics: drag out negotiations one more day until the world moves on 04:32 - Prince Reza Pahlavi finally playing offense, meeting key US politicians 05:44 - Criticism of Reza sparks cult-like backlash 07:09 - Trump knows leadership: it’s not about doing everything right, it’s about being strong 08:42 - Trump avoids war but won’t let himself be publicly humiliated 10:18 - Iran isn’t just a threat to Israel 11:45 - Trust Trump’s instincts, even if not every move is perfect 13:02 - Don’t waste time taking out Khamenei 14:27 - 47 years of brainwashing won’t vanish overnight 15:59 - The hate for the Pahlavi name runs deep in Iran 17:23 - Reza can’t rely on foreign generals 18:51 - Why the West once felt safe holding a historic summit in Iran 20:17 - Regime’s brutality started day one 21:46 - Iran needs a strong hand and realism 23:12 - Civil war in Iran could happen regardless of U.S. action 24:34 - Sanctions are the regime’s fault because of their failed diplomacy 26:08 - Iranians are suffering not because of sanctions, but because of corrupt leadership 27:33 - Reza Pahlavi burned too many bridges 29:01 - Mossad is absolutely involved in Iran Patrick Bet-David
40:11

🚨🇮🇷 PBD INTERVIEW: WILL TRUMP STRIKE IRAN? WILL THE REGIME FALL? Patrick Bet-David’s family fled Iran when he was a child. He’s been an avid supporter of the previous Shah, and a critic of the current regime However he has reservations of opposition leader Reza Pahlavi, and worries any U.S. strikes on the country could destabilize the region He rightly points out that the real challenge comes after the regime falls. Rebuilding Iran will be brutal, messy, and unforgiving, but avoiding it isn’t an option either. We get into: * Why negotiations with Khamenei’s leadership are a dead end * What a post-regime Iran would realistically look like * How the U.S. could influence outcomes without owning another war * And why the hardest part of Iran’s future starts after the fighting stops 03:03 - Regime's delay tactics: drag out negotiations one more day until the world moves on 04:32 - Prince Reza Pahlavi finally playing offense, meeting key US politicians 05:44 - Criticism of Reza sparks cult-like backlash 07:09 - Trump knows leadership: it’s not about doing everything right, it’s about being strong 08:42 - Trump avoids war but won’t let himself be publicly humiliated 10:18 - Iran isn’t just a threat to Israel 11:45 - Trust Trump’s instincts, even if not every move is perfect 13:02 - Don’t waste time taking out Khamenei 14:27 - 47 years of brainwashing won’t vanish overnight 15:59 - The hate for the Pahlavi name runs deep in Iran 17:23 - Reza can’t rely on foreign generals 18:51 - Why the West once felt safe holding a historic summit in Iran 20:17 - Regime’s brutality started day one 21:46 - Iran needs a strong hand and realism 23:12 - Civil war in Iran could happen regardless of U.S. action 24:34 - Sanctions are the regime’s fault because of their failed diplomacy 26:08 - Iranians are suffering not because of sanctions, but because of corrupt leadership 27:33 - Reza Pahlavi burned too many bridges 29:01 - Mossad is absolutely involved in Iran Patrick Bet-David

Mario Nawfal

2,028,627 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

🚨BREAKING: IRAN CANCELS NUCLEAR TALKS AS WAR WITH ISRAEL ESCALATES — TRUMP SPEAKS OUT Iran just walked away from nuclear talks with the U.S. as its war with Israel intensifies — and the world is on edge. President Trump is sounding the alarm: “Iran CANNOT have a nuclear weapon. Very simple. Other than that, we want them to be successful.” Meanwhile, Israel has carried out over 80 strikes in just the last 24 hours, targeting nuclear facilities, missile sites, and weapons infrastructure across Iran — including Natanz, Isfahan, and the underground Fordow site. Fox News confirms Iran was just 2-3 days away from producing a nuclear warhead. That’s why Netanyahu says Israel “did the world a favor” with these preemptive strikes. 🇺🇸 Why this matters to YOU: Iran’s proxies (Hamas, Hezbollah, Houthis) surround Israel in a “ring of fire.” Over 40,000 U.S. troops are stationed in the region. The U.S. may be dragged into this war if just one American service member is harmed. ⚠️Trump warned: if Iran retaliates, the full weight of the U.S. will be unleashed, however sources inside the white house tell me it is eminent that the US will join in on the air strikes against Iran and President Trump is allegedly going to make that announcement later today. Stay tuned and let's see if that comes to fruition 🧠 SMART LEADERSHIP: Trump tried to bring Middle East nations together to isolate Iran. 💥 NOW: Biden’s weakness & Obama-era appeasement are blowing up in real time. Should the U.S. support Israel’s strike or stay out? Comment 👇 #Iran #Israel #Trump #WW3 #MiddleEast #FoxNews #BREAKING
7:03

🚨BREAKING: IRAN CANCELS NUCLEAR TALKS AS WAR WITH ISRAEL ESCALATES — TRUMP SPEAKS OUT Iran just walked away from nuclear talks with the U.S. as its war with Israel intensifies — and the world is on edge. President Trump is sounding the alarm: “Iran CANNOT have a nuclear weapon. Very simple. Other than that, we want them to be successful.” Meanwhile, Israel has carried out over 80 strikes in just the last 24 hours, targeting nuclear facilities, missile sites, and weapons infrastructure across Iran — including Natanz, Isfahan, and the underground Fordow site. Fox News confirms Iran was just 2-3 days away from producing a nuclear warhead. That’s why Netanyahu says Israel “did the world a favor” with these preemptive strikes. 🇺🇸 Why this matters to YOU: Iran’s proxies (Hamas, Hezbollah, Houthis) surround Israel in a “ring of fire.” Over 40,000 U.S. troops are stationed in the region. The U.S. may be dragged into this war if just one American service member is harmed. ⚠️Trump warned: if Iran retaliates, the full weight of the U.S. will be unleashed, however sources inside the white house tell me it is eminent that the US will join in on the air strikes against Iran and President Trump is allegedly going to make that announcement later today. Stay tuned and let's see if that comes to fruition 🧠 SMART LEADERSHIP: Trump tried to bring Middle East nations together to isolate Iran. 💥 NOW: Biden’s weakness & Obama-era appeasement are blowing up in real time. Should the U.S. support Israel’s strike or stay out? Comment 👇 #Iran #Israel #Trump #WW3 #MiddleEast #FoxNews #BREAKING

Project Constitution

422,413 просмотров • 1 год назад

🇫🇷 MACRON IS RIGHT: REGIME CHANGE NEVER WORKS - AND IRAN WOULD BE NO DIFFERENT Trump just threatened to join Israel in bombing Iran. It’s not just saber-rattling - it signals yet another U.S. push for regime change. Macron warns: “Anyone who has sought in the past to change regimes through military strikes or operations has made strategic errors.” He’s right - and history proves it. In 1953, the CIA overthrew Iran’s elected leader Mossadegh. It planted the seeds of the 1979 revolution, and the regime we’re dealing with now. In Iraq, Saddam’s removal sparked a civil war and the rise of ISIS. Libya? Gaddafi gone, the country disintegrated. Syria? A devastating proxy war the U.S. helped inflame. Emmanuel Macron said it best: “I believe that peoples are sovereign, that they change their leaders themselves.” A former CIA officer told me: when Bush first said “regime change,” even U.S. intelligence panicked - they knew it would backfire. Iran would be no exception.
0:23

🇫🇷 MACRON IS RIGHT: REGIME CHANGE NEVER WORKS - AND IRAN WOULD BE NO DIFFERENT Trump just threatened to join Israel in bombing Iran. It’s not just saber-rattling - it signals yet another U.S. push for regime change. Macron warns: “Anyone who has sought in the past to change regimes through military strikes or operations has made strategic errors.” He’s right - and history proves it. In 1953, the CIA overthrew Iran’s elected leader Mossadegh. It planted the seeds of the 1979 revolution, and the regime we’re dealing with now. In Iraq, Saddam’s removal sparked a civil war and the rise of ISIS. Libya? Gaddafi gone, the country disintegrated. Syria? A devastating proxy war the U.S. helped inflame. Emmanuel Macron said it best: “I believe that peoples are sovereign, that they change their leaders themselves.” A former CIA officer told me: when Bush first said “regime change,” even U.S. intelligence panicked - they knew it would backfire. Iran would be no exception.

Mario Nawfal

295,569 просмотров • 1 год назад

🇮🇷 INTERVIEW – TRITA PARSI: “ISRAEL WANTED TO TURN IRAN INTO ANOTHER SYRIA OR LEBANON” Trita Parsi says Israel aimed to strike Iran with impunity, but the reality proved far more costly than expected. Trita Parsi: “The goal was to turn Iran into a country Israel could strike at will, like Syria or Lebanon. But Israel could not even carry out this attack without U.S. support. They hoped to achieve more with the first strike, but Iran’s missile response was stronger than expected. Toward the end of the war, more missiles were penetrating Israeli defenses and causing serious damage. Military censorship in Israel has limited public understanding, but the full picture is starting to emerge. Israel likely would have kept going if the U.S. had stayed in the fight. Once Washington pulled back, the cost-benefit shifted, and Israel agreed to a ceasefire.”
1:21

🇮🇷 INTERVIEW – TRITA PARSI: “ISRAEL WANTED TO TURN IRAN INTO ANOTHER SYRIA OR LEBANON” Trita Parsi says Israel aimed to strike Iran with impunity, but the reality proved far more costly than expected. Trita Parsi: “The goal was to turn Iran into a country Israel could strike at will, like Syria or Lebanon. But Israel could not even carry out this attack without U.S. support. They hoped to achieve more with the first strike, but Iran’s missile response was stronger than expected. Toward the end of the war, more missiles were penetrating Israeli defenses and causing serious damage. Military censorship in Israel has limited public understanding, but the full picture is starting to emerge. Israel likely would have kept going if the U.S. had stayed in the fight. Once Washington pulled back, the cost-benefit shifted, and Israel agreed to a ceasefire.”

Mario Nawfal

297,532 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

🚨🇺🇸 EX-CIA ANALYST ON VENEZUELA & IRAN Ex-CIA analyst Larry Johnson says the U.S. operation that captured Maduro was made possible by covert cooperation at the highest levels of Venezuelan security. According to Larry, a senior Venezuelan official, secretly working with U.S. intelligence for years, issued a stand-down order that allowed Delta Force to land, extract Maduro, and exit with precision and speed. What appeared to be a flawless special operation was, in his words, “staged.” And on Iran, Larry believes the current protests are instigated by U.S. and Israeli intelligence, and the likelihood of toppling the regime is slim. He believes the U.S. and Israel are planning new strikes against the country, and that the regime is more prepared than it was during the 12-day war, with more advanced weapons and better readiness. 03:21 - Initial reaction to Maduro’s capture and why it felt “staged” 06:08 - Questions around the helicopter incident and lack of U.S. casualties 09:26 - Why a stand-down order could happen without full coordination 12:18 - No real plan after capturing Maduro: lessons from Iraq 15:36 - U.S. goal in Venezuela: oil control and pushing out China, Russia, Iran 18:21 - Risk of escalation and the Vietnam-style trap for the U.S. 21:31 - Why “precision strikes” are a myth and air power has limits 23:05 - Why the operation succeeded: insiders, unlocked doors, and no defenses 26:16 - Misuse of the Monroe Doctrine and U.S. interference in Latin America 29:53 - Contradictions between multipolar reality and U.S. global actions 31:15 - Why threats backfire and push countries closer to BRICS 34:02 - Trump’s behavior as a symptom of declining U.S. hegemony 36:49 - Houthis, Red Sea reality, and limits of U.S. naval power 39:26 - Iran protests: intelligence operations versus real public anger 42:09 - MEK, Mossad, CIA, and manufacturing opposition narratives 47:04 - Iran preparing for war and turning to Russia and China 51:24 - Why Iran is stronger now despite war, sanctions, and protests 54:12 - Difference between Iran’s government and the Islamic Republic 56:44 - Why the U.S. cannot replicate the Maduro operation in Iran
58:29

🚨🇺🇸 EX-CIA ANALYST ON VENEZUELA & IRAN Ex-CIA analyst Larry Johnson says the U.S. operation that captured Maduro was made possible by covert cooperation at the highest levels of Venezuelan security. According to Larry, a senior Venezuelan official, secretly working with U.S. intelligence for years, issued a stand-down order that allowed Delta Force to land, extract Maduro, and exit with precision and speed. What appeared to be a flawless special operation was, in his words, “staged.” And on Iran, Larry believes the current protests are instigated by U.S. and Israeli intelligence, and the likelihood of toppling the regime is slim. He believes the U.S. and Israel are planning new strikes against the country, and that the regime is more prepared than it was during the 12-day war, with more advanced weapons and better readiness. 03:21 - Initial reaction to Maduro’s capture and why it felt “staged” 06:08 - Questions around the helicopter incident and lack of U.S. casualties 09:26 - Why a stand-down order could happen without full coordination 12:18 - No real plan after capturing Maduro: lessons from Iraq 15:36 - U.S. goal in Venezuela: oil control and pushing out China, Russia, Iran 18:21 - Risk of escalation and the Vietnam-style trap for the U.S. 21:31 - Why “precision strikes” are a myth and air power has limits 23:05 - Why the operation succeeded: insiders, unlocked doors, and no defenses 26:16 - Misuse of the Monroe Doctrine and U.S. interference in Latin America 29:53 - Contradictions between multipolar reality and U.S. global actions 31:15 - Why threats backfire and push countries closer to BRICS 34:02 - Trump’s behavior as a symptom of declining U.S. hegemony 36:49 - Houthis, Red Sea reality, and limits of U.S. naval power 39:26 - Iran protests: intelligence operations versus real public anger 42:09 - MEK, Mossad, CIA, and manufacturing opposition narratives 47:04 - Iran preparing for war and turning to Russia and China 51:24 - Why Iran is stronger now despite war, sanctions, and protests 54:12 - Difference between Iran’s government and the Islamic Republic 56:44 - Why the U.S. cannot replicate the Maduro operation in Iran

Mario Nawfal

880,540 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

🚨 INTERVIEW: IRAN WAR NOT FINISHED, “PHASE 2 IS COMING” Professor Seyed Mohammad Marandi is considered by many as the unofficial spokesperson of Iran. Last time we spoke was at the beginning of the 12-day war with Israel, when he was worried for his life as Iranian military commanders were being assassinated almost daily. Today, we look back at the outcome of the war and where we stand today. Marandi says Iran is preparing for the next round of war, and that the 12-day conflict with Israel was just the beginning. “The real story is that Trump saved the Israeli regime… they were taking a bad beating. As the war progressed, Iranian missiles were getting through, and they were running out.” From mass espionage arrests to nuclear policy shifts, Marandi says Tehran is gearing up, not backing down. He discusses: – Why Trump “saved” Israel at the last minute – How the war pushed Iranians toward nuclear weapons – 1,000+ arrests for espionage after Mossad infiltration – Why he believes “genocide” is being normalized in the West – And why Hezbollah will never disarm In his view, the war didn’t end. Phase 2 is coming. 03:17 – War flashback: Assassinations, fear, and the first interview 04:42 – Iran never accepted a ceasefire – “Israel was losing” 06:34 – “Trump saved Israel,” says Bannon – and here’s why 08:11 – “Phase 2 is coming” – Iran preparing across all fronts 09:01 – Millions took to the Tehran streets in support 14:37 – “The West believes its own propaganda about Iran” 16:25 – “Iran has real legitimacy – people rallied because of that” 19:36 – “No moral equivalence – one side is opposing genocide” 22:48 – Why Iran expects more Israeli strikes – and is ready 23:37 – Israel’s expansionism, the U.S. empire, and moral collapse 35:20 – “Why praise UAE, Turkey for normalizing – but not Iran for resisting?” 40:15 – Hezbollah will never disarm – and here’s why 42:39 – “Disarming would invite another occupation” 50:43 – 1,000+ arrested for espionage in post-war security crackdown 53:02 – Nuclear shift: “Public support for weapons has skyrocketed” 54:35 – Chemical weapon survivors from the 1980s war are still dying 55:37 – Marandi fought in the Iran–Iraq War as a teenager 56:41 – “US and Israel are pushing Iran toward nuclearization” 58:25 – Iranian missile tech “shocked” observers during war 59:18 – Why Marandi calls Western media “selective” and “dangerous”
1:00:40

🚨 INTERVIEW: IRAN WAR NOT FINISHED, “PHASE 2 IS COMING” Professor Seyed Mohammad Marandi is considered by many as the unofficial spokesperson of Iran. Last time we spoke was at the beginning of the 12-day war with Israel, when he was worried for his life as Iranian military commanders were being assassinated almost daily. Today, we look back at the outcome of the war and where we stand today. Marandi says Iran is preparing for the next round of war, and that the 12-day conflict with Israel was just the beginning. “The real story is that Trump saved the Israeli regime… they were taking a bad beating. As the war progressed, Iranian missiles were getting through, and they were running out.” From mass espionage arrests to nuclear policy shifts, Marandi says Tehran is gearing up, not backing down. He discusses: – Why Trump “saved” Israel at the last minute – How the war pushed Iranians toward nuclear weapons – 1,000+ arrests for espionage after Mossad infiltration – Why he believes “genocide” is being normalized in the West – And why Hezbollah will never disarm In his view, the war didn’t end. Phase 2 is coming. 03:17 – War flashback: Assassinations, fear, and the first interview 04:42 – Iran never accepted a ceasefire – “Israel was losing” 06:34 – “Trump saved Israel,” says Bannon – and here’s why 08:11 – “Phase 2 is coming” – Iran preparing across all fronts 09:01 – Millions took to the Tehran streets in support 14:37 – “The West believes its own propaganda about Iran” 16:25 – “Iran has real legitimacy – people rallied because of that” 19:36 – “No moral equivalence – one side is opposing genocide” 22:48 – Why Iran expects more Israeli strikes – and is ready 23:37 – Israel’s expansionism, the U.S. empire, and moral collapse 35:20 – “Why praise UAE, Turkey for normalizing – but not Iran for resisting?” 40:15 – Hezbollah will never disarm – and here’s why 42:39 – “Disarming would invite another occupation” 50:43 – 1,000+ arrested for espionage in post-war security crackdown 53:02 – Nuclear shift: “Public support for weapons has skyrocketed” 54:35 – Chemical weapon survivors from the 1980s war are still dying 55:37 – Marandi fought in the Iran–Iraq War as a teenager 56:41 – “US and Israel are pushing Iran toward nuclearization” 58:25 – Iranian missile tech “shocked” observers during war 59:18 – Why Marandi calls Western media “selective” and “dangerous”

Mario Nawfal

779,161 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

🚨🇮🇷EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW: THE PRINCE OF IRAN VS. THE REGIME THAT DESTROYED HIS COUNTRY Before 1979, Iran was booming—one of the world’s fastest-growing economies, a U.S. ally, and a rising global power. Women had rights. The military was elite. The country was on track to become the Japan of the Middle East. Then, the revolution happened. Radical clerics seized power. The economy collapsed. Freedom vanished. Iran became a global pariah—funding terror, oppressing its people, and sinking into endless conflict. Now, after 45 years, the regime is weaker than ever. Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi (Reza Pahlavi) reveals how Iran fell, and what it will take to finally bring down the Islamic Republic—before it’s too late. 02:08 – What was Iran really like before 1979? A nation on the rise, with a future that never came. 06:09 – How Iran went from a U.S. ally to one of the West’s greatest adversaries. 10:27 – "Iran should have been the South Korea of the Middle East—now it’s the North Korea." 12:32 – How did the country turn from a secular powerhouse into a theocratic dictatorship? 17:28 – "Why does the West still appease this regime? It has never worked." 19:06 – Did the Shah make fatal mistakes? Could history have taken a different path? 26:42 – Why have Iran’s protest movements failed? The key missing piece. 28:58 – The Iranian people are rediscovering their national identity—and the regime is terrified. 32:44 – Could a foreign power intervene? Should they? Who stands to gain? 36:06 – What would outside intervention look like? How far would it go? 40:16 – Could Iran strike a game-changing deal with the U.S. like Ukraine did? 49:43 – Has Reza Pahlavi had secret discussions about foreign support for Iranian protests? 57:03 – Why a free Iran wouldn’t just change the Middle East—it would change the world. 1:01:09 – Has Reza Pahlavi spoken to Russia and China about their support for the regime? 1:03:27 – If the U.S. and Russia become allies again, what does that mean for Iran? 1:06:14 – "This regime has devastated not just Iran, but the entire region." 1:09:54 – If the people wanted him to lead, would Reza Pahlavi step up? 1:13:25 – How close are Israel and Iran to all-out war? Is it inevitable? 1:20:56 – What does Reza Pahlavi think about Israel’s influence on global politics? 1:23:42 – If Pahlavi could sit with Trump and Putin, what would he tell them about Iran’s future?
1:27:19

🚨🇮🇷EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW: THE PRINCE OF IRAN VS. THE REGIME THAT DESTROYED HIS COUNTRY Before 1979, Iran was booming—one of the world’s fastest-growing economies, a U.S. ally, and a rising global power. Women had rights. The military was elite. The country was on track to become the Japan of the Middle East. Then, the revolution happened. Radical clerics seized power. The economy collapsed. Freedom vanished. Iran became a global pariah—funding terror, oppressing its people, and sinking into endless conflict. Now, after 45 years, the regime is weaker than ever. Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi (Reza Pahlavi) reveals how Iran fell, and what it will take to finally bring down the Islamic Republic—before it’s too late. 02:08 – What was Iran really like before 1979? A nation on the rise, with a future that never came. 06:09 – How Iran went from a U.S. ally to one of the West’s greatest adversaries. 10:27 – "Iran should have been the South Korea of the Middle East—now it’s the North Korea." 12:32 – How did the country turn from a secular powerhouse into a theocratic dictatorship? 17:28 – "Why does the West still appease this regime? It has never worked." 19:06 – Did the Shah make fatal mistakes? Could history have taken a different path? 26:42 – Why have Iran’s protest movements failed? The key missing piece. 28:58 – The Iranian people are rediscovering their national identity—and the regime is terrified. 32:44 – Could a foreign power intervene? Should they? Who stands to gain? 36:06 – What would outside intervention look like? How far would it go? 40:16 – Could Iran strike a game-changing deal with the U.S. like Ukraine did? 49:43 – Has Reza Pahlavi had secret discussions about foreign support for Iranian protests? 57:03 – Why a free Iran wouldn’t just change the Middle East—it would change the world. 1:01:09 – Has Reza Pahlavi spoken to Russia and China about their support for the regime? 1:03:27 – If the U.S. and Russia become allies again, what does that mean for Iran? 1:06:14 – "This regime has devastated not just Iran, but the entire region." 1:09:54 – If the people wanted him to lead, would Reza Pahlavi step up? 1:13:25 – How close are Israel and Iran to all-out war? Is it inevitable? 1:20:56 – What does Reza Pahlavi think about Israel’s influence on global politics? 1:23:42 – If Pahlavi could sit with Trump and Putin, what would he tell them about Iran’s future?

Mario Nawfal

3,639,544 просмотров • 1 год назад

🇺🇸🇮🇷 IS ISRAEL DRAGGING THE U.S. INTO ANOTHER FOREVER WAR? This debate between Cenk Uygur and IDF’s Jonathan Conricus got very very heated. I’ve never seen Cenk so upset The discussion started with a focus on the imminent war with Iran, and whether it is in America’s best interest Iran cannot reach the U.S. mainland with its missiles, does not have a nuclear weapon despite decades of warnings the country is on the verge of one, and has made it clear it does not want a war with the U.S. Cenk argues the Israeli lobby is the reason the U.S. is about to start a new war Jonathan disagrees, criticizing those who blame Israel for everything. In his view, Iran is building a nuclear weapon, as well as ballistic missiles that can reach the U.S., and has a history of destabilizing the region while killing U.S. servicemen through their proxies. The debate then moves to Israeli policy in the region, and the future of Gaza and the West Bank, and this is where it gets very emotional. Jonathan does not believe in a two-state solution, and Cenk equates that with genocide, asking one question: What will happen to the Palestinians if they do not accept to be integrated into Israel? Watch the full debate below with @jconricus0 and Cenk Uygur below. 03:00 - War nearly guaranteed, U.S. military buildup largest since Iraq, Israel controlling US policy 06:02 - Israel’s three “reasons” for war: nukes, missiles, foreign policy... none serve US interests 09:20 - Iranian people’s protests ignored; focus should be on their freedom, not regime 12:40 - Iranian regime’s threat: nuclear ambitions, ballistic missiles, proxy wars 16:15 - US has historic chance to reshape Middle East, reduce Iranian terror influence 19:50 - Critique of US politicians prioritizing Israel over Americans; 80% oppose war 23:30 - Israel blamed for pushing US into wars repeatedly; weapons of mass destruction parallels 27:15 - Jonathan argues Iran threatens Israel; discussion of Iranian missile capabilities 31:00 - Israel’s defense role vs US leadership in the region; Iran-China-Russia tech cooperation 34:45 - Extremist insurgencies likely if Iran invaded; past examples Iraq & Afghanistan 38:20 - Israel’s “Greater Israel” ambitions and annexations; impact on Palestinians 41:50 - Historical context: 1948 Nakba and ethnic cleansing accusations revisited 45:30 - Debate over Palestinian resistance vs Israeli self-defense; moral questions raised 49:10 - US public largely against war; Israel benefits more than America from regime collapse 52:45 - Peace offers to Palestinians rejected multiple times; Israel insists on defense 55:30 - Current Israeli strategy: annexation, control over Judea & Samaria, handling 5.5M Palestinians
57:25

🇺🇸🇮🇷 IS ISRAEL DRAGGING THE U.S. INTO ANOTHER FOREVER WAR? This debate between Cenk Uygur and IDF’s Jonathan Conricus got very very heated. I’ve never seen Cenk so upset The discussion started with a focus on the imminent war with Iran, and whether it is in America’s best interest Iran cannot reach the U.S. mainland with its missiles, does not have a nuclear weapon despite decades of warnings the country is on the verge of one, and has made it clear it does not want a war with the U.S. Cenk argues the Israeli lobby is the reason the U.S. is about to start a new war Jonathan disagrees, criticizing those who blame Israel for everything. In his view, Iran is building a nuclear weapon, as well as ballistic missiles that can reach the U.S., and has a history of destabilizing the region while killing U.S. servicemen through their proxies. The debate then moves to Israeli policy in the region, and the future of Gaza and the West Bank, and this is where it gets very emotional. Jonathan does not believe in a two-state solution, and Cenk equates that with genocide, asking one question: What will happen to the Palestinians if they do not accept to be integrated into Israel? Watch the full debate below with @jconricus0 and Cenk Uygur below. 03:00 - War nearly guaranteed, U.S. military buildup largest since Iraq, Israel controlling US policy 06:02 - Israel’s three “reasons” for war: nukes, missiles, foreign policy... none serve US interests 09:20 - Iranian people’s protests ignored; focus should be on their freedom, not regime 12:40 - Iranian regime’s threat: nuclear ambitions, ballistic missiles, proxy wars 16:15 - US has historic chance to reshape Middle East, reduce Iranian terror influence 19:50 - Critique of US politicians prioritizing Israel over Americans; 80% oppose war 23:30 - Israel blamed for pushing US into wars repeatedly; weapons of mass destruction parallels 27:15 - Jonathan argues Iran threatens Israel; discussion of Iranian missile capabilities 31:00 - Israel’s defense role vs US leadership in the region; Iran-China-Russia tech cooperation 34:45 - Extremist insurgencies likely if Iran invaded; past examples Iraq & Afghanistan 38:20 - Israel’s “Greater Israel” ambitions and annexations; impact on Palestinians 41:50 - Historical context: 1948 Nakba and ethnic cleansing accusations revisited 45:30 - Debate over Palestinian resistance vs Israeli self-defense; moral questions raised 49:10 - US public largely against war; Israel benefits more than America from regime collapse 52:45 - Peace offers to Palestinians rejected multiple times; Israel insists on defense 55:30 - Current Israeli strategy: annexation, control over Judea & Samaria, handling 5.5M Palestinians

Mario Nawfal

521,913 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Iran has warned Trump that a blockade on the SOH will be considered a declaration of war and Iran will respond. Day 44, the Iran war! Ibrahim Rezaei, spokesman for the National Security and Foreign Policy Committee of the Iranian Shura Council: Trump's talk of starting a naval blockade of Iran is more of a deception than a reality. If Trump tried his blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, it will be considered an act of war, and we will respond to it. -Trump's action will increase market instability. -We may reveal our other cards that we have not yet used in this game. Iran has more surprises prepared. Meanwhile, Iran has released footage of the Iranian Navy warning two US destroyers USS Michael Murphy and USS Frank E. Peterson to turn away from the Strait of Hormuz yesterday, or risk being targeted “Attention U.S. Navy warship, transiting near Fujairah Port and Oman Sea; this is IRGC Navy; LAST WARNING, LAST WARNING, LAST WARNING”. The ships left. Another capitulation for the Trump regime. -Israel is waiting on the U.S. for now resume attacks on Iran. -Netanyahu happy negotiations are over. -Israeli Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir has put the IDF on alert for immediate readiness to return to war with Iran -Yediot Ahronoth Trump: “I could take out Iran in one day. One hour. So why doesn’t he? Trump also predicts Iran will give him whatever he wants? More hoes like Epstein did? Meanwhile the UK has backed out of supporting trump’s blockade! -Trump begged for UK warships. -Trump threatens 50% tariff on China if it sends weapons to Iran. -China is having a good laugh!
0:11

Iran has warned Trump that a blockade on the SOH will be considered a declaration of war and Iran will respond. Day 44, the Iran war! Ibrahim Rezaei, spokesman for the National Security and Foreign Policy Committee of the Iranian Shura Council: Trump's talk of starting a naval blockade of Iran is more of a deception than a reality. If Trump tried his blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, it will be considered an act of war, and we will respond to it. -Trump's action will increase market instability. -We may reveal our other cards that we have not yet used in this game. Iran has more surprises prepared. Meanwhile, Iran has released footage of the Iranian Navy warning two US destroyers USS Michael Murphy and USS Frank E. Peterson to turn away from the Strait of Hormuz yesterday, or risk being targeted “Attention U.S. Navy warship, transiting near Fujairah Port and Oman Sea; this is IRGC Navy; LAST WARNING, LAST WARNING, LAST WARNING”. The ships left. Another capitulation for the Trump regime. -Israel is waiting on the U.S. for now resume attacks on Iran. -Netanyahu happy negotiations are over. -Israeli Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir has put the IDF on alert for immediate readiness to return to war with Iran -Yediot Ahronoth Trump: “I could take out Iran in one day. One hour. So why doesn’t he? Trump also predicts Iran will give him whatever he wants? More hoes like Epstein did? Meanwhile the UK has backed out of supporting trump’s blockade! -Trump begged for UK warships. -Trump threatens 50% tariff on China if it sends weapons to Iran. -China is having a good laugh!

Truth_teller 🇷🇺

26,093 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

The US and Israel are waging a war of aggression against Iran. This is not about nuclear weapons; it's about imperialism. Trump and Netanyahu admitted they want regime change. They want to put a puppet in power, like the former shah. I explain in this video. Timecodes: 0:00 USA & Israel bomb Iran 1:21 (CLIP) Trump threatens Iran's military 1:49 (CLIP) Trump calls for regime change 2:33 Iran retaliates, hitting US bases 3:26 Iran is not Venezuela, or Iraq 4:18 (CLIP) Trump fears US casualties 4:52 Israel's PM Netanyahu 6:08 US empire's plans for West Asia 7:39 (CLIP) Wesley Clark: 7 countries targeted 8:14 Nuclear weapons 9:15 Iran nuclear deal (JCPOA) 10:31 Fake US "negotiations" 12:21 Oil & gas in Middle East (West Asia) 12:45 USA wants to cut off China's oil supplies 13:55 Trump's oil blockade of Cuba 14:25 Israel: US empire's aircraft carrier 15:26 CIA coup in Iran in 1953 16:04 US-backed dictator, the shah 16:54 Iranian Revolution 17:20 Iran-Iraq War 17:52 US puppet, "crown prince" Reza Pahlavi 19:56 US-backed regime change in Syria 21:01 Imperialism 21:24 Outro
21:49

The US and Israel are waging a war of aggression against Iran. This is not about nuclear weapons; it's about imperialism. Trump and Netanyahu admitted they want regime change. They want to put a puppet in power, like the former shah. I explain in this video. Timecodes: 0:00 USA & Israel bomb Iran 1:21 (CLIP) Trump threatens Iran's military 1:49 (CLIP) Trump calls for regime change 2:33 Iran retaliates, hitting US bases 3:26 Iran is not Venezuela, or Iraq 4:18 (CLIP) Trump fears US casualties 4:52 Israel's PM Netanyahu 6:08 US empire's plans for West Asia 7:39 (CLIP) Wesley Clark: 7 countries targeted 8:14 Nuclear weapons 9:15 Iran nuclear deal (JCPOA) 10:31 Fake US "negotiations" 12:21 Oil & gas in Middle East (West Asia) 12:45 USA wants to cut off China's oil supplies 13:55 Trump's oil blockade of Cuba 14:25 Israel: US empire's aircraft carrier 15:26 CIA coup in Iran in 1953 16:04 US-backed dictator, the shah 16:54 Iranian Revolution 17:20 Iran-Iraq War 17:52 US puppet, "crown prince" Reza Pahlavi 19:56 US-backed regime change in Syria 21:01 Imperialism 21:24 Outro

Ben Norton

24,621 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🇺🇸🇮🇷🇻🇪 PEPE ESCOBAR ON VENEZUELA, IRAN, & UKRAINE - A NEW WORLD ORDER? I’ve said on multiple occasions that after Maduro’s capture, and with the severe weakening of Iran and their proxies, it’s become very difficult to criticize the capabilities of the U.S military and their intelligence. Well, Pepe Escobar disagrees, and he disagrees with many of my stances, including whether the Iranian regime will survive the current protests. In this conversation we discuss: •⁠ ⁠Who betrayed Maduro within his inner circle •⁠ ⁠What the future of Venezuela looks like •⁠ ⁠Is Iran next •⁠ ⁠Will the Iranian regime survive •⁠ ⁠And what all this means for the ongoing war in Ukraine Pepe Escobar regularly visits China, Russia, Iran, Lebanon, Venezuela, and even Yemen, and has deep knowledge on those regions, so I hope you enjoy his insights as much as I have. 03:02 - Venezuela intervention framed as reckless move tied to petrodollar collapse 06:11 - Venezuelan security chief demoted amid suspicions of internal betrayal 08:50 - Regime change vs U.S. interests: democracy not the real objective 11:22 - Trump’s unpredictability debated as a negotiating weapon in geopolitics 12:25 - Iran, Russia, and China unimpressed by Trump’s “madman” strategy 15:59 - NATO attacks on Russia’s nuclear command centers shift war dynamics 18:23 - U.S. dominance narrative challenged: geopolitics not about winning or losing 20:32 - Hezbollah described as ideological movement, not just an Iranian proxy 22:44 - Yemen and Iran framed as long-term resistance societies shaped by sanctions 26:04 - Iranian protests: economic pain mixed with foreign regime-change playbook 29:12 - Iran’s internal weaknesses acknowledged amid sanctions and generational divide 33:55 - Russia and China quietly backing Iran through infrastructure and logistics 36:20 - Beijing and Moscow operate on long-term strategic timelines, not fear 39:09 - BRICS payment systems and de-dollarization efforts explained 41:56 - Sanctions identified as main obstacle to Venezuela’s economic recovery 50:05 - Russia-Ukraine war outlook turns bleak after attack on Putin’s residence
54:11

🇺🇸🇮🇷🇻🇪 PEPE ESCOBAR ON VENEZUELA, IRAN, & UKRAINE - A NEW WORLD ORDER? I’ve said on multiple occasions that after Maduro’s capture, and with the severe weakening of Iran and their proxies, it’s become very difficult to criticize the capabilities of the U.S military and their intelligence. Well, Pepe Escobar disagrees, and he disagrees with many of my stances, including whether the Iranian regime will survive the current protests. In this conversation we discuss: •⁠ ⁠Who betrayed Maduro within his inner circle •⁠ ⁠What the future of Venezuela looks like •⁠ ⁠Is Iran next •⁠ ⁠Will the Iranian regime survive •⁠ ⁠And what all this means for the ongoing war in Ukraine Pepe Escobar regularly visits China, Russia, Iran, Lebanon, Venezuela, and even Yemen, and has deep knowledge on those regions, so I hope you enjoy his insights as much as I have. 03:02 - Venezuela intervention framed as reckless move tied to petrodollar collapse 06:11 - Venezuelan security chief demoted amid suspicions of internal betrayal 08:50 - Regime change vs U.S. interests: democracy not the real objective 11:22 - Trump’s unpredictability debated as a negotiating weapon in geopolitics 12:25 - Iran, Russia, and China unimpressed by Trump’s “madman” strategy 15:59 - NATO attacks on Russia’s nuclear command centers shift war dynamics 18:23 - U.S. dominance narrative challenged: geopolitics not about winning or losing 20:32 - Hezbollah described as ideological movement, not just an Iranian proxy 22:44 - Yemen and Iran framed as long-term resistance societies shaped by sanctions 26:04 - Iranian protests: economic pain mixed with foreign regime-change playbook 29:12 - Iran’s internal weaknesses acknowledged amid sanctions and generational divide 33:55 - Russia and China quietly backing Iran through infrastructure and logistics 36:20 - Beijing and Moscow operate on long-term strategic timelines, not fear 39:09 - BRICS payment systems and de-dollarization efforts explained 41:56 - Sanctions identified as main obstacle to Venezuela’s economic recovery 50:05 - Russia-Ukraine war outlook turns bleak after attack on Putin’s residence

Mario Nawfal

3,280,680 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Mearsheimer: Trump Can Start a War, but He Can't Control the End The U.S. airstrike on Iran has already gone beyond a single "incident." It's becoming a long war. Mearsheimer warned: “The U.S. will inflict enormous pain on Iran, but it won't win in the long term.” Under the excuse of a “targeting error,” the U.S. used Tomahawk missiles to bomb a girls’ elementary school in the city of Mina, killing 168 girls aged 8–10. At the outset of the war, they assassinated Ali Khamenei, Iran's Supreme Religious Leader and bombed multiple civilian areas. Over 1,000 Iranians died. These attacks silenced all domestic opposition in Iran. The same citizens who once protested the government now stand united. When American missiles slaughter your children, no one cares about politics anymore—only justice and vengeance. Trump miscalculated. He thought Iran would collapse like Venezuela. But Iran has lived through 8 years of brutal war and decades of sanctions. Surrender is not in their vocabulary. Iran’s new strategy: no talks, no compromise. Instead, they target global choke points like the Strait of Hormuz—disrupting oil flows, raising prices, and hitting U.S. voters directly in the wallet. U.S. polling shows most Americans oppose the war. CNN and AP-NORC found over half say military action makes the U.S. less safe. 56% have “little to no trust” in Trump’s use of force abroad. In just 13 days, 7 U.S. soldiers were killed, 140+ wounded. The more this drags on, the higher the political cost—especially in an election year. Iran’s new Supreme Leader has vowed revenge for *every* death. If compensation is denied, they’ll seize enemy assets. This is no longer tit-for-tat. It’s a protracted, strategic war. So Mearsheimer was right. Trump may start a war, but he cannot dictate its ending. And Iran? They’ve already decided—they will not back down.
4:10

Mearsheimer: Trump Can Start a War, but He Can't Control the End The U.S. airstrike on Iran has already gone beyond a single "incident." It's becoming a long war. Mearsheimer warned: “The U.S. will inflict enormous pain on Iran, but it won't win in the long term.” Under the excuse of a “targeting error,” the U.S. used Tomahawk missiles to bomb a girls’ elementary school in the city of Mina, killing 168 girls aged 8–10. At the outset of the war, they assassinated Ali Khamenei, Iran's Supreme Religious Leader and bombed multiple civilian areas. Over 1,000 Iranians died. These attacks silenced all domestic opposition in Iran. The same citizens who once protested the government now stand united. When American missiles slaughter your children, no one cares about politics anymore—only justice and vengeance. Trump miscalculated. He thought Iran would collapse like Venezuela. But Iran has lived through 8 years of brutal war and decades of sanctions. Surrender is not in their vocabulary. Iran’s new strategy: no talks, no compromise. Instead, they target global choke points like the Strait of Hormuz—disrupting oil flows, raising prices, and hitting U.S. voters directly in the wallet. U.S. polling shows most Americans oppose the war. CNN and AP-NORC found over half say military action makes the U.S. less safe. 56% have “little to no trust” in Trump’s use of force abroad. In just 13 days, 7 U.S. soldiers were killed, 140+ wounded. The more this drags on, the higher the political cost—especially in an election year. Iran’s new Supreme Leader has vowed revenge for *every* death. If compensation is denied, they’ll seize enemy assets. This is no longer tit-for-tat. It’s a protracted, strategic war. So Mearsheimer was right. Trump may start a war, but he cannot dictate its ending. And Iran? They’ve already decided—they will not back down.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

37,788 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🇮🇱 🇮🇷 Israel may be forced to act alone against Iran: Israel Hayom, a prominent Israeli newspaper often aligned with government views published an article today that was interesting. The article argues that any U.S.-Iran nuclear agreement must explicitly limit Iran's ballistic missile production, stockpiling and capabilities. Failing to take necessary measures would leave Israel vulnerable to an existential threat posed by Iran's missiles, which can transport nuclear warheads if Iran moves forward with its program, regardless of any nuclear constraints. In the event that a new deal fails to address missiles, Israel would be left with no option but to unilaterally attack Iranian missile facilities or related infrastructure to neutralize the threat, even without U.S. assistance. I see it as unlikely that the U.S. and Iran will come to an agreement in the negotiations. I usually don't focus so much on what is conveyed through the media but more on what reinforcements the U.S. is sending to the region. Given that, it is obvious that the U.S. is preparing for war.
0:22

🇮🇱 🇮🇷 Israel may be forced to act alone against Iran: Israel Hayom, a prominent Israeli newspaper often aligned with government views published an article today that was interesting. The article argues that any U.S.-Iran nuclear agreement must explicitly limit Iran's ballistic missile production, stockpiling and capabilities. Failing to take necessary measures would leave Israel vulnerable to an existential threat posed by Iran's missiles, which can transport nuclear warheads if Iran moves forward with its program, regardless of any nuclear constraints. In the event that a new deal fails to address missiles, Israel would be left with no option but to unilaterally attack Iranian missile facilities or related infrastructure to neutralize the threat, even without U.S. assistance. I see it as unlikely that the U.S. and Iran will come to an agreement in the negotiations. I usually don't focus so much on what is conveyed through the media but more on what reinforcements the U.S. is sending to the region. Given that, it is obvious that the U.S. is preparing for war.

WORLD AT WAR

24,074 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 INTERVIEW: IRAN’S PLAYBOOK - DRAIN THE U.S, CONTROL THE STRAIT, WIN THE WAR Stanislav Krapivnik, former U.S. Army officer, says Iran’s formula is cheap drones, buried missile launchers, and the ability to shut down the Strait of Hormuz while draining America’s billion-dollar air defenses one interception at a time. According to him, Iran is overwhelming U.S. systems with weapons that cost a fraction of what it takes to stop them. And his warning is blunt: air power alone has never toppled a regime. The only path to regime change is boots on the ground, and he says a ground invasion of Iran would be catastrophic for the U.S. military. 🇷🇺 STANISLAV KRAPIVNIK 🇷🇺 00:46 - Pentagon lies just like everyone else: first casualty of war is truth 05:15 - Iran's underground missile cities: decoys painted on ground fooling billion-dollar strikes 07:11 - Cheap drones can close Hormuz: thousand guys with VR goggles swarming ships day and night 10:56 - U.S. following Israel's lead: Greater Israel from Euphrates to Nile, Turkey is next 14:29 - U.S. stripping South Korea and Japan of air defenses for Israel 16:37 - No one fired at drone over Qatar: free sky, smack into radar array 23:43 - Stupidest move possible: murdered Khamenei who blocked Iran's nukes for 40 years 25:04 - 165 fathers from one school: "I'm going to take a rifle and murder them until I die" 26:06 - Iran-Iraq War veterans now in power: the generation that survived U.S. chemical weapons 28:59 - Russian MiGs in Iran: "more likely those aren't Iranian pilots," Moscow won't allow Iran to fall 38:13 - Trump's unconditional surrender trap: painted himself in a corner, no way to spin retreat 44:54 - 40% obesity rate kills the draft: who are we going to conscript to fight in Iranian mountains? 51:50 - Zelensky not planning to die in Ukraine: 9th largest landowner in America, family in London 54:38 - Russian vs American mentality: "die, but do" vs "do or die"
55:33

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷 INTERVIEW: IRAN’S PLAYBOOK - DRAIN THE U.S, CONTROL THE STRAIT, WIN THE WAR Stanislav Krapivnik, former U.S. Army officer, says Iran’s formula is cheap drones, buried missile launchers, and the ability to shut down the Strait of Hormuz while draining America’s billion-dollar air defenses one interception at a time. According to him, Iran is overwhelming U.S. systems with weapons that cost a fraction of what it takes to stop them. And his warning is blunt: air power alone has never toppled a regime. The only path to regime change is boots on the ground, and he says a ground invasion of Iran would be catastrophic for the U.S. military. 🇷🇺 STANISLAV KRAPIVNIK 🇷🇺 00:46 - Pentagon lies just like everyone else: first casualty of war is truth 05:15 - Iran's underground missile cities: decoys painted on ground fooling billion-dollar strikes 07:11 - Cheap drones can close Hormuz: thousand guys with VR goggles swarming ships day and night 10:56 - U.S. following Israel's lead: Greater Israel from Euphrates to Nile, Turkey is next 14:29 - U.S. stripping South Korea and Japan of air defenses for Israel 16:37 - No one fired at drone over Qatar: free sky, smack into radar array 23:43 - Stupidest move possible: murdered Khamenei who blocked Iran's nukes for 40 years 25:04 - 165 fathers from one school: "I'm going to take a rifle and murder them until I die" 26:06 - Iran-Iraq War veterans now in power: the generation that survived U.S. chemical weapons 28:59 - Russian MiGs in Iran: "more likely those aren't Iranian pilots," Moscow won't allow Iran to fall 38:13 - Trump's unconditional surrender trap: painted himself in a corner, no way to spin retreat 44:54 - 40% obesity rate kills the draft: who are we going to conscript to fight in Iranian mountains? 51:50 - Zelensky not planning to die in Ukraine: 9th largest landowner in America, family in London 54:38 - Russian vs American mentality: "die, but do" vs "do or die"

Mario Nawfal

883,343 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Iran war, day 124 | Is the U.S. planning an attack sooner than later? The evidence: -U.S. has increased its military build up -USS Boxer amphibious assault ship is in the region - Multiple C-17 cargo jets have been flying from Fort Brag, major uptick -there are 24 plus navy ships, battle ships, submarines in the region -Ohio class battle ships present serve as mobile missile launchers -over 50,000 troops remain on active duty and they’re preparing for something -Kurdish separatist (PKK) group by the Iraqi border doing military exercises -KDPI (Kurdish dem party of Iran) is now clashing with IRGC, there are casualties -KDPI is a terror group based in Iraq -KDPI is trained & armed by CIA, same group trump armed to start Iran riots -despite MOU, there’s no de-escalation In fact there’s proof Israel tried to murder iran’s negotiators Dr. Ghalibaf, Dr. Araghchi on their way to Islamabad! •the US warned Iran via Pakistan -Iranian delegation’s aircraft landed early in Mashhad after 2 Israeli jets reportedly entered Iranian airspace from the direction of Iraq. -The delegation then traveled by land to Tehran. Is US CENTCOM planning something big? Adm. Brad Cooper, CENTCOM commander, and senior military officials from Bahrain, Egypt, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Oman, Qatar, Saudi, Syria, the UAE, and Yemen discussed the current regional security environment and opportunities for enhancing defense collaboration across the region. How many of these Arab states are led by Sunni regimes again? Yes the U.S. has a base in Yemen! Leaders underscored their shared commitment to the free flow of commerce through the SOH. This is the 1st time Lebanon and Syria have attended a major naval summit with the U.S. Is the US and its terror militias planning a major attack on Iran to take the SOH? Iran isn’t taking the bait for now! -Iran has targeting Kurdish separatist groups in recent days. -An IRGC UAV (OWA-UAV) struck Iranian Kurdish opposition positions on Mount Hariri in Erbil Governorate, Iraqi Kurdistan. Iran also rejected a US offer to unfreeze a part of stolen Iranian frozen funds in exchange for Iran abandoning the planned charging of tolls on commercial shipping in SOH. But Trump said the SOH is open again? So why the need to bribe Iran to open it? US UN ambassador Mike Waltz urges Iran to give in! Waltz: “Iran cannot keep choosing death and curse. And today we once again urge Iran to revert to the path of peace and dialogue. The world is not with Iran. Iran's own people are not with this regime, and its neighbors are not with this regime.” Meanwhile the U.S. can’t even pass a UNSCR to wage war on Iran! Where do Trump’s lies stand today? US’s top crypto scammer Trump says Iran has agreed to almost everything the US wanted. Really? So why the military build up? Prof. Marandi corrected a few of the lies: •Bombed nuclear sites will not be inspected until the Trump regime fully abides by its commitments. •The Bushehr and Tehran reactors have never been off limits. •After 60 days, Iran definitely plans to collect fees from ships passing through the SOH. Why not now? Why is adherence to the MOU one sided? •Iran never planned to use the frozen funds for the military. •It produces most of its own needs and also exports large amounts of oil, other commodities, and goods. •Trump needs a narrative to justify releasing the assets. My analysis: -the U.S. and its allies are building up their military presence to resume hostilities soon! There may be another attempted invasion! -Trump and Israel will not abide by agreements or respect iran’s control of the SOH -Trump don’t release funds or remove sanctions any time soon if at all -Will Trump heed Loomer’s advice and strike Iran during the 5 day funeral procession of their murdered Supreme Leader Seyed Ali Khamenei while international leaders are present? •Agent Loomer freely calls on Mossad to attack Iran!
0:25

Iran war, day 124 | Is the U.S. planning an attack sooner than later? The evidence: -U.S. has increased its military build up -USS Boxer amphibious assault ship is in the region - Multiple C-17 cargo jets have been flying from Fort Brag, major uptick -there are 24 plus navy ships, battle ships, submarines in the region -Ohio class battle ships present serve as mobile missile launchers -over 50,000 troops remain on active duty and they’re preparing for something -Kurdish separatist (PKK) group by the Iraqi border doing military exercises -KDPI (Kurdish dem party of Iran) is now clashing with IRGC, there are casualties -KDPI is a terror group based in Iraq -KDPI is trained & armed by CIA, same group trump armed to start Iran riots -despite MOU, there’s no de-escalation In fact there’s proof Israel tried to murder iran’s negotiators Dr. Ghalibaf, Dr. Araghchi on their way to Islamabad! •the US warned Iran via Pakistan -Iranian delegation’s aircraft landed early in Mashhad after 2 Israeli jets reportedly entered Iranian airspace from the direction of Iraq. -The delegation then traveled by land to Tehran. Is US CENTCOM planning something big? Adm. Brad Cooper, CENTCOM commander, and senior military officials from Bahrain, Egypt, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Oman, Qatar, Saudi, Syria, the UAE, and Yemen discussed the current regional security environment and opportunities for enhancing defense collaboration across the region. How many of these Arab states are led by Sunni regimes again? Yes the U.S. has a base in Yemen! Leaders underscored their shared commitment to the free flow of commerce through the SOH. This is the 1st time Lebanon and Syria have attended a major naval summit with the U.S. Is the US and its terror militias planning a major attack on Iran to take the SOH? Iran isn’t taking the bait for now! -Iran has targeting Kurdish separatist groups in recent days. -An IRGC UAV (OWA-UAV) struck Iranian Kurdish opposition positions on Mount Hariri in Erbil Governorate, Iraqi Kurdistan. Iran also rejected a US offer to unfreeze a part of stolen Iranian frozen funds in exchange for Iran abandoning the planned charging of tolls on commercial shipping in SOH. But Trump said the SOH is open again? So why the need to bribe Iran to open it? US UN ambassador Mike Waltz urges Iran to give in! Waltz: “Iran cannot keep choosing death and curse. And today we once again urge Iran to revert to the path of peace and dialogue. The world is not with Iran. Iran's own people are not with this regime, and its neighbors are not with this regime.” Meanwhile the U.S. can’t even pass a UNSCR to wage war on Iran! Where do Trump’s lies stand today? US’s top crypto scammer Trump says Iran has agreed to almost everything the US wanted. Really? So why the military build up? Prof. Marandi corrected a few of the lies: •Bombed nuclear sites will not be inspected until the Trump regime fully abides by its commitments. •The Bushehr and Tehran reactors have never been off limits. •After 60 days, Iran definitely plans to collect fees from ships passing through the SOH. Why not now? Why is adherence to the MOU one sided? •Iran never planned to use the frozen funds for the military. •It produces most of its own needs and also exports large amounts of oil, other commodities, and goods. •Trump needs a narrative to justify releasing the assets. My analysis: -the U.S. and its allies are building up their military presence to resume hostilities soon! There may be another attempted invasion! -Trump and Israel will not abide by agreements or respect iran’s control of the SOH -Trump don’t release funds or remove sanctions any time soon if at all -Will Trump heed Loomer’s advice and strike Iran during the 5 day funeral procession of their murdered Supreme Leader Seyed Ali Khamenei while international leaders are present? •Agent Loomer freely calls on Mossad to attack Iran!

Truth_teller 🇷🇺

20,365 просмотров • 14 дней назад