Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Fable 5 returns today. Sonnet 5 dropped yesterday. Both stories in one video. Sonnet 5 uses 1.35x more tokens than Sonnet 4.6. Sonnet models are supposed to be fast, cheap, and efficient. Sonnet 5 is none of those. Fable 5 is back but moves to usage based billing on... show more

BridgeMind

45,507 subscribers

23,634 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Fable 5 is BACK on AI/ML API We gave Sonnet 5 and Fable 5 the exact same prompt and same real flight dataset of 70 airports and 435 routes pulled from flightradar. Then asked each one to turn it into a cinematic 3D globe as a single HTML file. Outputs: Sonnet 5: 9.8k tokens, $0.10 Fable 5: 15k tokens, $0.77 Sonnet 5 came in 87% cheaper. It drew the routes, but the planet underneath them barely exists: a dark wireframe with the arcs floating in space. Fable 5 built an actual Earth: textured oceans, ice caps, atmospheric glow. Mythos-class models are truly a masterpiece. Docs, guides & setup below:

Fable 5 is BACK on AI/ML API We gave Sonnet 5 and Fable 5 the exact same prompt and same real flight dataset of 70 airports and 435 routes pulled from flightradar. Then asked each one to turn it into a cinematic 3D globe as a single HTML file. Outputs: Sonnet 5: 9.8k tokens, $0.10 Fable 5: 15k tokens, $0.77 Sonnet 5 came in 87% cheaper. It drew the routes, but the planet underneath them barely exists: a dark wireframe with the arcs floating in space. Fable 5 built an actual Earth: textured oceans, ice caps, atmospheric glow. Mythos-class models are truly a masterpiece. Docs, guides & setup below:

AI/ML API

498,492 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Big day for Claude fans! We now have Sonnet 5 and Fable is back tomorrow 🙏 I saw a lot of misunderstandings about Sonnet 5, so I rushed out a video to try and break it down.

Big day for Claude fans! We now have Sonnet 5 and Fable is back tomorrow 🙏 I saw a lot of misunderstandings about Sonnet 5, so I rushed out a video to try and break it down.

Theo - t3.gg

94,399 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Claude Sonnet 4.8 is imminent. Most likely dropping today. Sonnet 4.6 is starting to look outdated. Look at the Flappy Bird test on BridgeBench. GPT 5.5 and Claude Opus 4.7 have moved past it. The model that used to be the default for most vibe coders is falling behind. Anthropic needs Sonnet 4.8 to close the gap. The second it drops, we're running it through every BridgeBench test and posting the results live. New Sonnet day. Let's see what Anthropic has.

Claude Sonnet 4.8 is imminent. Most likely dropping today. Sonnet 4.6 is starting to look outdated. Look at the Flappy Bird test on BridgeBench. GPT 5.5 and Claude Opus 4.7 have moved past it. The model that used to be the default for most vibe coders is falling behind. Anthropic needs Sonnet 4.8 to close the gap. The second it drops, we're running it through every BridgeBench test and posting the results live. New Sonnet day. Let's see what Anthropic has.

Bridgebench

16,715 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Grok 4.5 operates at Opus-level intelligence and Sonnet-level pricing! We tested it against Claude Opus 4.8, Sonnet 5, and GLM 5.2 on a SpaceX mission: liftoff, stage sep, orbit insertion, satellite deploy. Grok 4.5 animates it more accurately and vividly than Sonnet 5 and GLM 5.2. Opus is the fastest and most expensive. Grok burns more tokens but still lands ~40% cheaper than Opus, and a bit under Sonnet 5. Time / tokens / cost: Grok 4.5 — / 35k / $0.69 Opus 4.8 — / 13.7k / $1.10 Sonnet 5 — / 22.1k / $0.78 GLM 5.2 — / 92.7k / $0.13 yet GLM did the whole mission for $0.13 😮

Grok 4.5 operates at Opus-level intelligence and Sonnet-level pricing! We tested it against Claude Opus 4.8, Sonnet 5, and GLM 5.2 on a SpaceX mission: liftoff, stage sep, orbit insertion, satellite deploy. Grok 4.5 animates it more accurately and vividly than Sonnet 5 and GLM 5.2. Opus is the fastest and most expensive. Grok burns more tokens but still lands ~40% cheaper than Opus, and a bit under Sonnet 5. Time / tokens / cost: Grok 4.5 — / 35k / $0.69 Opus 4.8 — / 13.7k / $1.10 Sonnet 5 — / 22.1k / $0.78 GLM 5.2 — / 92.7k / $0.13 yet GLM did the whole mission for $0.13 😮

GMI Cloud

150,809 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Claude Sonnet 4.5 is now the default model for Augment Code. We’re rolling it out to all customers over the next 24 hours, where it will be available alongside Sonnet 4 (for a limited time) and GPT-5 in the model picker. Here’s how Sonnet 4.5 compares to Sonnet 4:

Claude Sonnet 4.5 is now the default model for Augment Code. We’re rolling it out to all customers over the next 24 hours, where it will be available alongside Sonnet 4 (for a limited time) and GPT-5 in the model picker. Here’s how Sonnet 4.5 compares to Sonnet 4:

Augment Code

29,476 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

Grok 4.5 is a "Wow!" moment. 🤯 > Opus 4.8 & GPT-5.5 level on benchmarks > Costs less than Sonnet 5 Is that real? Hard to believe. Added Grok 4.5 as an implementer agent in fable-advisor. It replaces Sonnet 5. Use Fable as the orchestrator and a combo of: 1. Grok 4.5 2. Opus 4.8 3. GPT-5.5 As implementer agents. Uses the Grok Build CLI so if you log in with an X premium account you don't have to pay API fees.

Grok 4.5 is a "Wow!" moment. 🤯 > Opus 4.8 & GPT-5.5 level on benchmarks > Costs less than Sonnet 5 Is that real? Hard to believe. Added Grok 4.5 as an implementer agent in fable-advisor. It replaces Sonnet 5. Use Fable as the orchestrator and a combo of: 1. Grok 4.5 2. Opus 4.8 3. GPT-5.5 As implementer agents. Uses the Grok Build CLI so if you log in with an X premium account you don't have to pay API fees.

Dan McAteer

191,306 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Anthropic just dropped a 45-minute workshop on how to build agents with Fable 5 for 20% of it cost. "give Fable very difficult tasks - that's when you actually see the value" • 10% → 1:40 - full capabilities of Fable 5 • 30% → 11:13 - how to build evals with Fable • 55% → 13:29 - when to use Fable & Sonnet • 80% → 17:23 -how to use Fable 50% cheaper • 100% → 18:03 - Fable 5 Agents orchestration patterns This is worth more then 100 youtube with on how to use Fable 5 Watch today - then read the full playbook below ↓

Anthropic just dropped a 45-minute workshop on how to build agents with Fable 5 for 20% of it cost. "give Fable very difficult tasks - that's when you actually see the value" • 10% → 1:40 - full capabilities of Fable 5 • 30% → 11:13 - how to build evals with Fable • 55% → 13:29 - when to use Fable & Sonnet • 80% → 17:23 -how to use Fable 50% cheaper • 100% → 18:03 - Fable 5 Agents orchestration patterns This is worth more then 100 youtube with on how to use Fable 5 Watch today - then read the full playbook below ↓

Movez

16,134 görüntüleme • 24 gün önce

FREE Fable 5, Opus 4.8, Sonnet 5, and GPT-5.6 in one IDE. Alibaba built it, 520 credits at signup - one Sonnet 5 message eats 4. It's called Accio. Web or Windows desktop, both free. Registration takes 30 seconds via Google or email. Inside: → Fable 5 for creative and long-context work. → Opus 4.6 through 4.8 - the full Anthropic frontier lineup. → Sonnet 5 for speed and reasoning at pennies per message. → GPT-5.5 for OpenAI native tasks. → Gemini 3.1 Pro and 3.5 Flash for multimodal. Real math: 520 credits divided by 4 = 130 Sonnet 5 messages in your first week. Cheaper models drop that even further. Anthropic charges $20/month for the same access with weekly limits. Custom MCP support built in. Profile > Settings > MCP. Every agent workflow you've built for Claude Desktop ports over instantly. Setup: → Go to accio(.)com → Sign up with Google → 520 credits land automatically → Pick your model and start firing prompts Bookmark this before Alibaba puts it behind a paywall.

Atenov int.

31,157 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Head of Anthropic Labs: "Fable is one of those models you'll just remember - like Sonnet 3.5, Opus 4, Opus 4.5. Fable is way smarter than me. It finishes a task, lists its trade-offs, and I have to ask it to explain them to me." in 20-minute talk, the Anthropic head reveals the full capabilities of the Fable 5 model in practice. Watch it now, then read how to use this frontier model in the article below

Head of Anthropic Labs: "Fable is one of those models you'll just remember - like Sonnet 3.5, Opus 4, Opus 4.5. Fable is way smarter than me. It finishes a task, lists its trade-offs, and I have to ask it to explain them to me." in 20-minute talk, the Anthropic head reveals the full capabilities of the Fable 5 model in practice. Watch it now, then read how to use this frontier model in the article below

Movez

33,774 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

"Its (Sonnet 5) performance is close to Opus 4.8, at lower prices." So I ran 4 canvas test through both. > Opus 4.8, 4/4 actually animating. > Sonnet 5, 2/4 came back as static images. And "lower price"? On the paper shredder task, Sonnet 5 spent $0.36 for a static image. Opus 4.8 spent $0.18 and it actually animated. The 4 tests: > Win 98 drag-to-BSOD > Self-typing keyboard + CRT > Letter burning > Paper shredder

"Its (Sonnet 5) performance is close to Opus 4.8, at lower prices." So I ran 4 canvas test through both. > Opus 4.8, 4/4 actually animating. > Sonnet 5, 2/4 came back as static images. And "lower price"? On the paper shredder task, Sonnet 5 spent $0.36 for a static image. Opus 4.8 spent $0.18 and it actually animated. The 4 tests: > Win 98 drag-to-BSOD > Self-typing keyboard + CRT > Letter burning > Paper shredder

stevibe

60,788 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Anthropic is leading the Industry with models - like Sonnet and Opus - and developer tools - like Claude Code. Here are 5 tips to get more out of Claude Code!

Anthropic is leading the Industry with models - like Sonnet and Opus - and developer tools - like Claude Code. Here are 5 tips to get more out of Claude Code!

Jon Meyers

14,226 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

Anthropic is about to pull Fable 5 from your Claude subscription plan tomorrow. In the next 24 hours, you need to do these things urgently. 0:00 Intro 1:35 Managing usage credits 2:52 Re-create Fable intelligence w/ an extraction loop 7:45 Fable + Sonnet 5 strategy 10:33 Learning the 10-80-10 strategy 13:00 Advisor skill

Anthropic is about to pull Fable 5 from your Claude subscription plan tomorrow. In the next 24 hours, you need to do these things urgently. 0:00 Intro 1:35 Managing usage credits 2:52 Re-create Fable intelligence w/ an extraction loop 7:45 Fable + Sonnet 5 strategy 10:33 Learning the 10-80-10 strategy 13:00 Advisor skill

Miles Deutscher

94,397 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

$SITUATION EXPLAINED: Kimi K3 just beat Fable on a major coding benchmark, at a fraction of the price. • Kimi K3 beat Fable on Frontend Code Arena • The gap between Kimi and Fable is bigger than the gap between Fable and Sol • It also smashes Opus outright, while being priced the same as Sonnet, $3/$15 per million tokens • Sonnet 5 High currently sits in 10th place on this leaderboard at that same price point • The generational jump is dramatic: Kimi K2.6 ranked 18th on this benchmark, K3 jumped 17 spots to take the top spot • K3 ranked #1 in 6 of 7 tested domains: brand and marketing, reference-based design, data and analytics, consumer products, simulations, and content creation tools, it placed #2, only in gaming, behind Fable • Full model weights are set to release July 27th Theo Jaffee: "Imagine if Anthropic were a public company today, their stock would be down 20%, maybe more, enterprises are probably not gonna be spending $10 and $50 on Fable when they can instead be spending $3 and $15 on Kimi K3."$

SITUATION EXPLAINED: Kimi K3 just beat Fable on a major coding benchmark, at a fraction of the price. • Kimi K3 beat Fable on Frontend Code Arena • The gap between Kimi and Fable is bigger than the gap between Fable and Sol • It also smashes Opus outright, while being priced the same as Sonnet, $3/$15 per million tokens • Sonnet 5 High currently sits in 10th place on this leaderboard at that same price point • The generational jump is dramatic: Kimi K2.6 ranked 18th on this benchmark, K3 jumped 17 spots to take the top spot • K3 ranked #1 in 6 of 7 tested domains: brand and marketing, reference-based design, data and analytics, consumer products, simulations, and content creation tools, it placed #2, only in gaming, behind Fable • Full model weights are set to release July 27th Theo Jaffee: "Imagine if Anthropic were a public company today, their stock would be down 20%, maybe more, enterprises are probably not gonna be spending $10 and $50 on Fable when they can instead be spending $3 and $15 on Kimi K3."

MTS

132,705 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Anthropic finally published the prompting playbook for every Claude model. > Prompting Claude Sonnet 5. > Prompting Claude Opus 4.8. > Prompting Claude Opus 5. > Prompting Claude Fable 5. After reading it, one thing is clear. Almost nobody is getting the most out of Claude. It shows exactly how each model should be prompted instead of relying on guesswork. If Claude is in your workflow, bookmark this.

Anthropic finally published the prompting playbook for every Claude model. > Prompting Claude Sonnet 5. > Prompting Claude Opus 4.8. > Prompting Claude Opus 5. > Prompting Claude Fable 5. After reading it, one thing is clear. Almost nobody is getting the most out of Claude. It shows exactly how each model should be prompted instead of relying on guesswork. If Claude is in your workflow, bookmark this.

shmidt

123,426 görüntüleme • 27 gün önce

Tip: Ask Claude Code Community to use adapters, feature flags, and interfaces for implementations. 1. Model releases improve rapidly: 2024 June: Sonnet 3.5 2024 Oct: Sonnet 3.6 2025 Feb: Sonnet 3.7 2025 May: Sonnet/Opus 4 2025 Sept: Sonnet 4.5 Design key components around interfaces to do seamless rewrites with stronger released models. Use adapters and feature flags to gradually roll out usage. 2. There's tremendous value in simply updating api to use `claude-sonnet-4-5`. But remembering timeless software abstractions allows for the entire application to improve with the model. 3. Use Claude 4.5 Sonnet beyond code—it's a powerhouse for daily tasks. Try the Claude Chrome extension for forms, calendars, emails, or automating expense reports. These capabilities build on Sonnet 4.5's enhanced agentic capabilities making it easier to integrate to daily life. 4. We're living in a truly magical era, together. Enjoy the moment.

Tip: Ask Claude Code Community to use adapters, feature flags, and interfaces for implementations. 1. Model releases improve rapidly: 2024 June: Sonnet 3.5 2024 Oct: Sonnet 3.6 2025 Feb: Sonnet 3.7 2025 May: Sonnet/Opus 4 2025 Sept: Sonnet 4.5 Design key components around interfaces to do seamless rewrites with stronger released models. Use adapters and feature flags to gradually roll out usage. 2. There's tremendous value in simply updating api to use `claude-sonnet-4-5`. But remembering timeless software abstractions allows for the entire application to improve with the model. 3. Use Claude 4.5 Sonnet beyond code—it's a powerhouse for daily tasks. Try the Claude Chrome extension for forms, calendars, emails, or automating expense reports. These capabilities build on Sonnet 4.5's enhanced agentic capabilities making it easier to integrate to daily life. 4. We're living in a truly magical era, together. Enjoy the moment.

Claude Code Community

14,042 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

sonnet 5 vs sonnet 4.6 vs opus 4.8 vs glm 5.2 – frontend tasks dropped sonnet 5 into a quick test today. same three prompts to all four models, single-shot html/canvas, no edits: • objects falling on a trampoline • rockets playing tennis • a slingshot breaking bottles ranked by speed (total across the 3 tasks): 1. opus 4.8 – 15m 09s 2. sonnet 5 – 16m 05s 3. glm 5.2 – 27m 18s 4. sonnet 4.6 – 35m 06s ranked by code shortness (total loc): 1. sonnet 5 – 1794 2. opus 4.8 – 2063 3. sonnet 4.6 – 2182 4. glm 5.2 – 3285 sonnet 5 came out on top here – leanest code overall and a near-tie for fastest it was also the most creative. in every task it added something none of the others did: – kept the trampoline vibrating after the objects landed – drew a +1 next to the rocket that scored the point – turned the slingshot to face the next bottle before each shot opus 4.8 evaluated the code sonnet 5 produced. four things stood out: • the sphere is a fake, and that's the smart move. the cube and star are real 3d meshes with proper culling and shading, but the ball is just a flat shaded circle. a lit sphere looks identical from every angle, so building it in 3d would burn compute for zero visible payoff. knowing where not to bother is its own kind of skill • weight actually means something on the trampoline. the star is heavy, so it barely bounces and dents the mat hard. the ball is light, so it's lively and leaves a shallow dip. the three objects aren't just different shapes – they have different temperaments, and the physics is what gives them that • the slingshot is framed like a shot, not just drawn. the handle is anchored below the bottom of the screen and runs off-frame, so it reads as something you're holding rather than a sprite parked in the scene. that's a staging instinct, not a rendering one • the paddle ai forward-simulates the ball to predict where it'll land, then adds a deliberate error bias (roughly 1 in 5 shots is a real miss). that's why scoring looks natural instead of robotic – plus four distinct fault types with a catch-all so a rally never hangs without a result bottom line: sonnet 5 does more with less. fastest tier, leanest code, and the only one that added small touches nobody asked for follow thehype. for 24/7 ai news, analysis and breakdowns

sonnet 5 vs sonnet 4.6 vs opus 4.8 vs glm 5.2 – frontend tasks dropped sonnet 5 into a quick test today. same three prompts to all four models, single-shot html/canvas, no edits: • objects falling on a trampoline • rockets playing tennis • a slingshot breaking bottles ranked by speed (total across the 3 tasks): 1. opus 4.8 – 15m 09s 2. sonnet 5 – 16m 05s 3. glm 5.2 – 27m 18s 4. sonnet 4.6 – 35m 06s ranked by code shortness (total loc): 1. sonnet 5 – 1794 2. opus 4.8 – 2063 3. sonnet 4.6 – 2182 4. glm 5.2 – 3285 sonnet 5 came out on top here – leanest code overall and a near-tie for fastest it was also the most creative. in every task it added something none of the others did: – kept the trampoline vibrating after the objects landed – drew a +1 next to the rocket that scored the point – turned the slingshot to face the next bottle before each shot opus 4.8 evaluated the code sonnet 5 produced. four things stood out: • the sphere is a fake, and that's the smart move. the cube and star are real 3d meshes with proper culling and shading, but the ball is just a flat shaded circle. a lit sphere looks identical from every angle, so building it in 3d would burn compute for zero visible payoff. knowing where not to bother is its own kind of skill • weight actually means something on the trampoline. the star is heavy, so it barely bounces and dents the mat hard. the ball is light, so it's lively and leaves a shallow dip. the three objects aren't just different shapes – they have different temperaments, and the physics is what gives them that • the slingshot is framed like a shot, not just drawn. the handle is anchored below the bottom of the screen and runs off-frame, so it reads as something you're holding rather than a sprite parked in the scene. that's a staging instinct, not a rendering one • the paddle ai forward-simulates the ball to predict where it'll land, then adds a deliberate error bias (roughly 1 in 5 shots is a real miss). that's why scoring looks natural instead of robotic – plus four distinct fault types with a catch-all so a rally never hangs without a result bottom line: sonnet 5 does more with less. fastest tier, leanest code, and the only one that added small touches nobody asked for follow thehype. for 24/7 ai news, analysis and breakdowns

thehype.

14,518 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

I couldn't believe the results of this benchmarking test. I blind-tested 6 frontier models — Sonnet 5, Opus 4.8, Fable 5, GPT 5.5, GLM 5.2, and Kimi 2.5 — on knowledge work, not engineering. Writing. Analysis. Design. Vibe coding. Subagent simulations. The stuff we actually do all day. Same prompts, each model running its own subagent, every output graded blind before the labels were revealed. The results: → GLM 5.2 (the dirt-cheap open-source model from China) took first → Sonnet 5 took second, beating Fable 5 for knowledge work → Opus 4.8 got whooped Then I had Composer 2.5 judge every output independently — and it picked Fable 5 almost across the board. My blind picks and the AI judge completely disagreed. Full breakdown, method, and prompts in the video below. Which model are you running as your daily driver right now?

I couldn't believe the results of this benchmarking test. I blind-tested 6 frontier models — Sonnet 5, Opus 4.8, Fable 5, GPT 5.5, GLM 5.2, and Kimi 2.5 — on knowledge work, not engineering. Writing. Analysis. Design. Vibe coding. Subagent simulations. The stuff we actually do all day. Same prompts, each model running its own subagent, every output graded blind before the labels were revealed. The results: → GLM 5.2 (the dirt-cheap open-source model from China) took first → Sonnet 5 took second, beating Fable 5 for knowledge work → Opus 4.8 got whooped Then I had Composer 2.5 judge every output independently — and it picked Fable 5 almost across the board. My blind picks and the AI judge completely disagreed. Full breakdown, method, and prompts in the video below. Which model are you running as your daily driver right now?

JJ Englert

10,737 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Most people are using Fable 5 wrong & overpaying every single day. Anthropic's Head of Labs just showed how to use Fable 5 the right way. He shared the exact workflow they use internally: -Run parallel Claude sessions. -Fable only for planning. -Sonnet for quick questions. -Effort levels for simple work. -Verification loops that catch mistakes before they cost tokens. After this you will run Fable 5 like an Anthropic engineer. Bookmark this or keep burning your tokens.

Most people are using Fable 5 wrong & overpaying every single day. Anthropic's Head of Labs just showed how to use Fable 5 the right way. He shared the exact workflow they use internally: -Run parallel Claude sessions. -Fable only for planning. -Sonnet for quick questions. -Effort levels for simple work. -Verification loops that catch mistakes before they cost tokens. After this you will run Fable 5 like an Anthropic engineer. Bookmark this or keep burning your tokens.

Roan

19,661 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Anthropic Engineer: "Fable 5 is back, and most people will use it wrong" "You can set up Sonnet 5 and Fable 5 properly in one afternoon and stop overpaying every single day" In 29 minutes, he breaks down each Claude model, why setup matters, and where Fable 5 fits Not every task needs the strongest model Some jobs need speed. Some need reasoning. Some need long agent loops Fable 5 is where the loop work gets interesting: planning, checking, fixing, and running again Most people will upgrade and keep the same messy workflow Power users will route the right task to the right model and save money daily Bookmark and watch this before everyone starts wasting Fable 5

Anthropic Engineer: "Fable 5 is back, and most people will use it wrong" "You can set up Sonnet 5 and Fable 5 properly in one afternoon and stop overpaying every single day" In 29 minutes, he breaks down each Claude model, why setup matters, and where Fable 5 fits Not every task needs the strongest model Some jobs need speed. Some need reasoning. Some need long agent loops Fable 5 is where the loop work gets interesting: planning, checking, fixing, and running again Most people will upgrade and keep the same messy workflow Power users will route the right task to the right model and save money daily Bookmark and watch this before everyone starts wasting Fable 5

rari

20,907 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

This is the best way to use Claude Fable in Claude Code without immediately hitting your limits. 1. Model set to Fable 5 2. Reasoning on Max 3. Instruct Claude to run a dynamic workflow where: 3a. Fable is the orchestrator 3b. Opus does the reasoning heavy phases Fable is so overpowered that you don't need its intelligence for every step. Let it orchestrate Opus or even Sonnet.

This is the best way to use Claude Fable in Claude Code without immediately hitting your limits. 1. Model set to Fable 5 2. Reasoning on Max 3. Instruct Claude to run a dynamic workflow where: 3a. Fable is the orchestrator 3b. Opus does the reasoning heavy phases Fable is so overpowered that you don't need its intelligence for every step. Let it orchestrate Opus or even Sonnet.

Dan McAteer

910,156 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce