FACTCHECK: Nuclear won't cost $600 billion It's based on extrapolating the cost of the most expensive nuclear power plant ever and doubling it. It assumes nuclear costs 5x more than even what the CSIRO predicts. The nuclear fear campaign must stop.

Robert Gottliebsen has also said that the $600b price tag for nuclear is a fabrication, a number that Chalmers has plucked from the air

@PeterDutton_MP @BradBattinMP @LiberalAus @LiberalVictoria well done Will, keep them honest.

Well said Will. Nuclear is critical to Australia's future generations and economic prosperity. The lies need to stop.

I don't know why we don't go 100% nuclear for our grid.

Ever heard of Chernobyl? Oh, that's right. You weren't even born then. Or even fuchishima or 3 mile island. We don't want nuclear.

Nuclear power is no longer the future; it’s the present. Get exposure to cutting-edge nuclear companies poised to lead the charge in safe, efficient, and low-carbon energy production. Consider $NUKZ for your gateway to sustainable energy investments.

If only Australia had a government organisation specifically dedicated to promoting nuclear technology and maybe even runs a nuclear reactor just south of the country’s second largest city to provide this sort of advice. Guess we’ll never know.

Useless unreliable renewables are replaced 5 times in the life of a nuclear power system. This has to be taken into account when comparing the price differences.

Will you should be demanding that @SophieScamps @zalisteggall @Mon4Kooyong call out the lies since they are ones saying we need a ministry of truth @SenatorRennick @craigkellyXXX @Gary_Hardgrave @nyunggai

Did they account for the CFMEU talent for forcing budget overruns ?

on ya mate love and respect from tasmania