Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Fei-Fei Li says that even if AI surpasses certain human capabilities, it is not necessarily universally super intelligent video models can predict an apple falling, but they cannot derive the equation F=ma from that observation "we have no idea how AI can get there yet"

Haider.

61,710 subscribers

46,033 views • 7 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Education News & Politics Science & Technology

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

World Labs CEO Dr. Fei-Fei Li says AI must change how we teach and evaluate students: "AI must change learning. AI must change K-16 learning." "The most precious resource of our entire world is human capital." "When we have gotten the technology that can answer standardized tests... when AI can do better than an average human, it's not about humans are bad. It's about we need to change the education system." "We need to change how we evaluate. We need to change the way we empower teachers to educate the next generation of students where they can use these tools, be empowered, and do things that we can never imagine." "All of the kids today should not be scared of AI. They should feel the human agency to lead AI, to use AI in the right way, and to use AI to make the impact that they want to make for the world." Fei-Fei Li at Bloomberg Tech live with Emily Chang

World Labs CEO Dr. Fei-Fei Li says AI must change how we teach and evaluate students: "AI must change learning. AI must change K-16 learning." "The most precious resource of our entire world is human capital." "When we have gotten the technology that can answer standardized tests... when AI can do better than an average human, it's not about humans are bad. It's about we need to change the education system." "We need to change how we evaluate. We need to change the way we empower teachers to educate the next generation of students where they can use these tools, be empowered, and do things that we can never imagine." "All of the kids today should not be scared of AI. They should feel the human agency to lead AI, to use AI in the right way, and to use AI to make the impact that they want to make for the world." Fei-Fei Li at Bloomberg Tech live with Emily Chang

a16z

81,757 views • 2 months ago

Fei-Fei Li says AI is not over-hyped; it is a civilizational technology that represents the new computing Wherever chips exist today, from light bulbs to self-driving cars, AI will inevitably follow "wherever there is compute, there will be AI"

Fei-Fei Li says AI is not over-hyped; it is a civilizational technology that represents the new computing Wherever chips exist today, from light bulbs to self-driving cars, AI will inevitably follow "wherever there is compute, there will be AI"

Haider.

102,542 views • 8 months ago

Yuval Noah Harari says what makes AI artificial is that we built it, yet can't explain it. “If you can predict how it will behave.. by definition, this is not AI. This is just an automatic machine.”

Yuval Noah Harari says what makes AI artificial is that we built it, yet can't explain it. “If you can predict how it will behave.. by definition, this is not AI. This is just an automatic machine.”

vitrupo

22,403 views • 1 year ago

📁 Fei-Fei Li, one of the most influential AI scientists in the world, argues that common sense is not as mysterious as we think. Much of it is already encoded in language, distilled through thousands of years of human communication. When an AI places the sun at the top of a drawing, it does not need deep physics, it is learning shared patterns. In her view, common sense can be learned, and in many ways an AI is not so different from a five year old child.

📁 Fei-Fei Li, one of the most influential AI scientists in the world, argues that common sense is not as mysterious as we think. Much of it is already encoded in language, distilled through thousands of years of human communication. When an AI places the sun at the top of a drawing, it does not need deep physics, it is learning shared patterns. In her view, common sense can be learned, and in many ways an AI is not so different from a five year old child.

Jon Hernandez

20,744 views • 6 months ago

Fei-Fei Li on what simulation can do for robotics that real-world data can't: "You play out events that haven't happened, or cannot happen... And while you play it out, you learn how to act in it." "That's really important in robotics, because we cannot possibly have enough real-world data for that." "Here is a real life example: the industry of self-driving cars. Waymo has officially said they use billions of hours of simulation." "Cars are the simplest kind of robots. So clearly simulation plays a huge role in robotic learning." Fei-Fei Li Yunzhu Li World Labs martin_casado

Fei-Fei Li on what simulation can do for robotics that real-world data can't: "You play out events that haven't happened, or cannot happen... And while you play it out, you learn how to act in it." "That's really important in robotics, because we cannot possibly have enough real-world data for that." "Here is a real life example: the industry of self-driving cars. Waymo has officially said they use billions of hours of simulation." "Cars are the simplest kind of robots. So clearly simulation plays a huge role in robotic learning." Fei-Fei Li Yunzhu Li World Labs martin_casado

a16z

34,650 views • 9 days ago

AI “godmother” Fei-Fei Li challenges those who fear an AI future: “Since the dawn of human civilization, we have been creating technologies meant for improving our lives…and yes, they also have negative consequences. Fires burn, cars have fatal crashes, printed books can spread lies, and even medicines meant for saving lives have fatal side effects… Yet it’s undeniable that technologies have contributed vastly to the modernization of our species. So today, I’m not here to argue AI is good or bad in a simple black-and-white manner… I want to advocate for a new framework of thinking about AI. It’s a framework where humans own our agency, dignity, and responsibility to ensure that AI is here to augment our capabilities, to live and work better.”

AI “godmother” Fei-Fei Li challenges those who fear an AI future: “Since the dawn of human civilization, we have been creating technologies meant for improving our lives…and yes, they also have negative consequences. Fires burn, cars have fatal crashes, printed books can spread lies, and even medicines meant for saving lives have fatal side effects… Yet it’s undeniable that technologies have contributed vastly to the modernization of our species. So today, I’m not here to argue AI is good or bad in a simple black-and-white manner… I want to advocate for a new framework of thinking about AI. It’s a framework where humans own our agency, dignity, and responsibility to ensure that AI is here to augment our capabilities, to live and work better.”

The Free Press

12,695 views • 1 year ago

I asked Fei-Fei Li how far we are from AI with the everyday capability of humans. The omelet, the laundry folding, the basketball. First she answered like a scientist: "I never know what's 100%." Then the range: not 100 years, maybe not even 50, and not one year either. Her goal is to get there in her lifetime.

I asked Fei-Fei Li how far we are from AI with the everyday capability of humans. The omelet, the laundry folding, the basketball. First she answered like a scientist: "I never know what's 100%." Then the range: not 100 years, maybe not even 50, and not one year either. Her goal is to get there in her lifetime.

Marina Mogilko

13,420 views • 1 month ago

Dr. Fei-Fei Li (Fei-Fei Li) is known as the “godmother of AI.” For the past two decades, she’s been at the center of AI’s most significant breakthroughs, including: - Spearheading ImageNet, the dataset that sparked the AI explosion we’re living through right now. - Leading work at Stanford Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (SAIL) - Serving as Chief Scientist of AI/ML at Google Cloud - Co-founding Stanford’s Institute for Human-Centered AI - Serving on the United Nations AI Scientific Advisory Board - Being named as Time's 100 most influential people in AI In this conversation, Fei-Fei shares the rarely told history of how we got to today—and what comes next. We discuss: 🔸 The backstory on ImageNet 🔸 Why robotics faces unique challenges compared with language models and what’s needed to overcome them 🔸 Why Fei-Fei believes AI won’t replace humans but will require us to take responsibility for ourselves 🔸 Why world models and spatial intelligence represent the next frontier in AI, beyond large language models 🔸 The surprising applications of Marble, from movie production to psychological research 🔸 How to participate in AI regardless of your role 🔸 Much more Listen now 👇 • YouTube: • Spotify: • Apple: Thank you to our wonderful sponsors for supporting the podcast: 🏆 Figma Make — A prompt-to-code tool for making ideas real: 🏆 Justworks — The all-in-one HR solution for managing your small business with confidence: 🏆 Sinch — Build messaging, email, and calling into your product:

Dr. Fei-Fei Li (Fei-Fei Li) is known as the “godmother of AI.” For the past two decades, she’s been at the center of AI’s most significant breakthroughs, including: - Spearheading ImageNet, the dataset that sparked the AI explosion we’re living through right now. - Leading work at Stanford Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (SAIL) - Serving as Chief Scientist of AI/ML at Google Cloud - Co-founding Stanford’s Institute for Human-Centered AI - Serving on the United Nations AI Scientific Advisory Board - Being named as Time's 100 most influential people in AI In this conversation, Fei-Fei shares the rarely told history of how we got to today—and what comes next. We discuss: 🔸 The backstory on ImageNet 🔸 Why robotics faces unique challenges compared with language models and what’s needed to overcome them 🔸 Why Fei-Fei believes AI won’t replace humans but will require us to take responsibility for ourselves 🔸 Why world models and spatial intelligence represent the next frontier in AI, beyond large language models 🔸 The surprising applications of Marble, from movie production to psychological research 🔸 How to participate in AI regardless of your role 🔸 Much more Listen now 👇 • YouTube: • Spotify: • Apple: Thank you to our wonderful sponsors for supporting the podcast: 🏆 Figma Make — A prompt-to-code tool for making ideas real: 🏆 Justworks — The all-in-one HR solution for managing your small business with confidence: 🏆 Sinch — Build messaging, email, and calling into your product:

Lenny Rachitsky

250,455 views • 8 months ago

“An AI that can act before it understands is not reliable infrastructure.” Yann LeCun, Meta’s Chief AI Scientist and one of the fathers of modern deep learning, says current LLMs are intrinsically unsafe. Not because they are evil, but because they hallucinate, lack common sense, and cannot reliably predict the consequences of agentic actions.

“An AI that can act before it understands is not reliable infrastructure.” Yann LeCun, Meta’s Chief AI Scientist and one of the fathers of modern deep learning, says current LLMs are intrinsically unsafe. Not because they are evil, but because they hallucinate, lack common sense, and cannot reliably predict the consequences of agentic actions.

Jon Hernandez

10,497 views • 2 months ago

Fei-Fei Li ( Fei-Fei Li ) beautifully explains Robotics. She defines robotics not by form, like humanoids or cars, but by function: they are any "embodied machines" that must perceive, understand, and act within a physical, 3D space. This core requirement is "spatial intelligence," the unifying principle of all robotics, allowing them to perform tasks and even collaborate with humans. Throughout all of human history, we have been confined to a single, shared reality: the "physical Earth 3D world." This singularity has been our only playground. However, new technologies that combine 3D generation and reconstruction are shattering this limitation. We can now create "infinite universes"—a multiverse of digital worlds for countless purposes, from training robots to enabling creativity, travel, and storytelling. This leap from one physical world to an infinite multiverse unlocks boundless possibilities for human imagination and interaction. Video from a16z

Fei-Fei Li ( Fei-Fei Li ) beautifully explains Robotics. She defines robotics not by form, like humanoids or cars, but by function: they are any "embodied machines" that must perceive, understand, and act within a physical, 3D space. This core requirement is "spatial intelligence," the unifying principle of all robotics, allowing them to perform tasks and even collaborate with humans. Throughout all of human history, we have been confined to a single, shared reality: the "physical Earth 3D world." This singularity has been our only playground. However, new technologies that combine 3D generation and reconstruction are shattering this limitation. We can now create "infinite universes"—a multiverse of digital worlds for countless purposes, from training robots to enabling creativity, travel, and storytelling. This leap from one physical world to an infinite multiverse unlocks boundless possibilities for human imagination and interaction. Video from a16z

Rohan Paul

41,441 views • 6 months ago

Fei-Fei Li ( Fei-Fei Li ) beautifully explains Robotics. She defines robotics not by form, like humanoids or cars, but by function: they are any "embodied machines" that must perceive, understand, and act within a physical, 3D space. This core requirement is "spatial intelligence," the unifying principle of all robotics, allowing them to perform tasks and even collaborate with humans. Throughout all of human history, we have been confined to a single, shared reality: the "physical Earth 3D world." This singularity has been our only playground. However, new technologies that combine 3D generation and reconstruction are shattering this limitation. We can now create "infinite universes"—a multiverse of digital worlds for countless purposes, from training robots to enabling creativity, travel, and storytelling. This leap from one physical world to an infinite multiverse unlocks boundless possibilities for human imagination and interaction. Video from a16z

Fei-Fei Li ( Fei-Fei Li ) beautifully explains Robotics. She defines robotics not by form, like humanoids or cars, but by function: they are any "embodied machines" that must perceive, understand, and act within a physical, 3D space. This core requirement is "spatial intelligence," the unifying principle of all robotics, allowing them to perform tasks and even collaborate with humans. Throughout all of human history, we have been confined to a single, shared reality: the "physical Earth 3D world." This singularity has been our only playground. However, new technologies that combine 3D generation and reconstruction are shattering this limitation. We can now create "infinite universes"—a multiverse of digital worlds for countless purposes, from training robots to enabling creativity, travel, and storytelling. This leap from one physical world to an infinite multiverse unlocks boundless possibilities for human imagination and interaction. Video from a16z

Rohan Paul

51,174 views • 3 months ago

Puck's Dylan Byers says AI has become a priority for Hollywood, with every major studio exploring how to integrate it into production. "Every studio, even A24, is thinking, 'How do we incorporate AI into what we are doing?'" "The signal that those creators sent with films like Obsession and others is that [using AI in filmmaking] can be done and it can be successful. Does it mean that every human is going away? No. I think that most folks will find ways to incorporate [AI] in ways that do not significantly degrade the value of the content that they're making." "But I think the sky's the limit. Those examples have shown that this can be done and that there is more opportunity here than the folks who are clutching to Hollywood's past have realized."

Puck's Dylan Byers says AI has become a priority for Hollywood, with every major studio exploring how to integrate it into production. "Every studio, even A24, is thinking, 'How do we incorporate AI into what we are doing?'" "The signal that those creators sent with films like Obsession and others is that [using AI in filmmaking] can be done and it can be successful. Does it mean that every human is going away? No. I think that most folks will find ways to incorporate [AI] in ways that do not significantly degrade the value of the content that they're making." "But I think the sky's the limit. Those examples have shown that this can be done and that there is more opportunity here than the folks who are clutching to Hollywood's past have realized."

TBPN

54,791 views • 24 days ago

Chatbots aren’t the revolution. They’re the distraction. Fei-Fei Li: “Language is a half-million-year-old luxury. Perception is a half-billion-year-old necessity.” Evolution didn’t optimize for conversation. It optimized for survival in three-dimensional space. Seeing threats, navigating obstacles, predicting what happens when you move. We’ve spent years celebrating AI that can write and summarize. But text processing is narrow. Spatial intelligence is fundamental. An agent that only reads prompts can’t function in a warehouse or a hospital. It needs to parse depth, understand physics, and act on what it sees in real time. We built AI that understands language. Now we’re building AI that understands space. Language models got the attention. Spatial intelligence gets the work done. The world runs on physics, not paragraphs. AI is learning to operate in it.

Chatbots aren’t the revolution. They’re the distraction. Fei-Fei Li: “Language is a half-million-year-old luxury. Perception is a half-billion-year-old necessity.” Evolution didn’t optimize for conversation. It optimized for survival in three-dimensional space. Seeing threats, navigating obstacles, predicting what happens when you move. We’ve spent years celebrating AI that can write and summarize. But text processing is narrow. Spatial intelligence is fundamental. An agent that only reads prompts can’t function in a warehouse or a hospital. It needs to parse depth, understand physics, and act on what it sees in real time. We built AI that understands language. Now we’re building AI that understands space. Language models got the attention. Spatial intelligence gets the work done. The world runs on physics, not paragraphs. AI is learning to operate in it.

Dustin

51,772 views • 5 months ago

Sahil Bloom reveals you can make $100,000/month doing AI consulting for businesses “You could be making an enormous amount of money by consulting directly with companies that have no idea how to use AI or implement it into their workflow.” “I think that a young person that understands AI, and like has a pretty decent understanding of some of the models that are out there and the capabilities, can go build a $100,000 a month business doing that.”

Sahil Bloom reveals you can make $100,000/month doing AI consulting for businesses “You could be making an enormous amount of money by consulting directly with companies that have no idea how to use AI or implement it into their workflow.” “I think that a young person that understands AI, and like has a pretty decent understanding of some of the models that are out there and the capabilities, can go build a $100,000 a month business doing that.”

The Iced Coffee Hour

18,669 views • 2 months ago

Google's DeepMind CEO Demis Hassabis: AGI is a system that exhibits all the cognitive capabilities that humans have. The brain is the only existence proof we have that general intelligence is possible. Today’s systems are impressive — but they’re not there yet. We’ve still got at least another 5–10 years to go. AI could be the ultimate tool for accelerating scientific discovery. We can tackle disease, climate, inequality. It could be the ultimate enhancement tool for human scientists. The potential is there — if we do it the right way.

Google's DeepMind CEO Demis Hassabis: AGI is a system that exhibits all the cognitive capabilities that humans have. The brain is the only existence proof we have that general intelligence is possible. Today’s systems are impressive — but they’re not there yet. We’ve still got at least another 5–10 years to go. AI could be the ultimate tool for accelerating scientific discovery. We can tackle disease, climate, inequality. It could be the ultimate enhancement tool for human scientists. The potential is there — if we do it the right way.

Clash Report

22,086 views • 5 months ago

Elon Musk on the rapid advancement of AI and robotics "I'm confident that if AI and robotics continue to advance which they are advancing very rapidly working will be optional, and people will have any goods and services that they want" AI and robotics are advancing so fast that, eventually, they could satisfy nearly every human need. At that point, abundance becomes the default, and the real question is no longer about production, but purpose "There is a limit people can only eat so much food. But I think if you can think of it, you can have it in the future"

Elon Musk on the rapid advancement of AI and robotics "I'm confident that if AI and robotics continue to advance which they are advancing very rapidly working will be optional, and people will have any goods and services that they want" AI and robotics are advancing so fast that, eventually, they could satisfy nearly every human need. At that point, abundance becomes the default, and the real question is no longer about production, but purpose "There is a limit people can only eat so much food. But I think if you can think of it, you can have it in the future"

X Freeze

753,687 views • 3 months ago

Neuroscientist Anil Seth says the idea that AI is on the path to consciousness is a reflection of our psychological biases, not fact We confuse intelligence (doing the right thing) with consciousness (having an experience) "they coexist in us, but not necessarily in machines"

Neuroscientist Anil Seth says the idea that AI is on the path to consciousness is a reflection of our psychological biases, not fact We confuse intelligence (doing the right thing) with consciousness (having an experience) "they coexist in us, but not necessarily in machines"

Haider.

69,795 views • 7 months ago

Satya Nadella just clarified the Microsoft open Ai deal and the terms what they signed for Azure. Here is exactly how he breaks down the partnership How it was Essentially think of OpenAI having a PaaS business and a SaaS business. The SaaS business is ChatGPT. Their PaaS business is their API. That API is Azure exclusive. The SaaS business, they can run it anywhere. If they want a partner and that partner wants to use a stateless API, then Azure is the place where they can get the stateless API. for even that they'll have to come to Azure. For any custom agreement like that. There are some few exceptions, the US government and so on, that we made, but other than that, they'd have to come to Azure. Open Ai can host there Chat Gpt consumer app wherever they want there wish but when it comes to developers or enterprise want to build on top of Open Ai models Microsoft owned the pipeline.

Satya Nadella just clarified the Microsoft open Ai deal and the terms what they signed for Azure. Here is exactly how he breaks down the partnership How it was Essentially think of OpenAI having a PaaS business and a SaaS business. The SaaS business is ChatGPT. Their PaaS business is their API. That API is Azure exclusive. The SaaS business, they can run it anywhere. If they want a partner and that partner wants to use a stateless API, then Azure is the place where they can get the stateless API. for even that they'll have to come to Azure. For any custom agreement like that. There are some few exceptions, the US government and so on, that we made, but other than that, they'd have to come to Azure. Open Ai can host there Chat Gpt consumer app wherever they want there wish but when it comes to developers or enterprise want to build on top of Open Ai models Microsoft owned the pipeline.

Vikram M

102,649 views • 5 days ago

Will ChatGPT take all the writing jobs? Tyler Cowen says: "A lot of people who thought they would be writers, I will predict they won't be. Something like generic corporate writing is the first to go from what I can see. So what will persist? It could be writing a biography of a person. The AI cannot really do. It may help you a lot, but it can't go out and interview the high school teacher and so on, writing memoirs. Of course the AI cannot do writing that is more subjective, more personal. I think the AI already can do it very well, especially DeepSeek. But I'm not sure readers want the better product from the AI. They may want it from a human being. I feel that I do. So if I read a brilliant memoir written by an AI, but it corresponded to no actual life, I would read a few of those, but at some point I'd get bored and I don't think I would keep on reading them, even if they were better than human memoirs on average." tylercowen

Will ChatGPT take all the writing jobs? Tyler Cowen says: "A lot of people who thought they would be writers, I will predict they won't be. Something like generic corporate writing is the first to go from what I can see. So what will persist? It could be writing a biography of a person. The AI cannot really do. It may help you a lot, but it can't go out and interview the high school teacher and so on, writing memoirs. Of course the AI cannot do writing that is more subjective, more personal. I think the AI already can do it very well, especially DeepSeek. But I'm not sure readers want the better product from the AI. They may want it from a human being. I feel that I do. So if I read a brilliant memoir written by an AI, but it corresponded to no actual life, I would read a few of those, but at some point I'd get bored and I don't think I would keep on reading them, even if they were better than human memoirs on average." tylercowen

David Perell

45,172 views • 1 year ago

A NOBEL WINNING PHYSICIST ARGUED THAT NO AI, NO MATTER HOW POWERFUL, WILL EVER TRULY UNDERSTAND A SINGLE THING IT SAYS. HIS REASON IS NOT COMPUTE OR DATA -- IT IS A MATH THEOREM FROM THE 1930s THAT SAYS SOME TRUTHS CAN BE SEEN BUT NEVER COMPUTED 81 minutes with Roger Penrose -- the Oxford physicist who won a Nobel for his work on black holes and general relativity. -> His claim: whatever consciousness is, it is not a computation. A machine following rules can imitate understanding, but never actually have it. He builds it on Gödel: a human can just "see" that certain statements are true, even though no algorithm can ever prove them. That seeing, he argues, is non-computational. If he is right, understanding is not something you scale into. You can stack a trillion parameters and still have zero awareness underneath. Which cuts straight through the AI moment. Everyone assumes bigger models will eventually "wake up". Penrose says that is a category error -- more computation is still just computation. You thought intelligence and understanding were the same thing. This is the conversation that pulls them apart. Save this. It is the sharpest case against the hype ↓

A NOBEL WINNING PHYSICIST ARGUED THAT NO AI, NO MATTER HOW POWERFUL, WILL EVER TRULY UNDERSTAND A SINGLE THING IT SAYS. HIS REASON IS NOT COMPUTE OR DATA -- IT IS A MATH THEOREM FROM THE 1930s THAT SAYS SOME TRUTHS CAN BE SEEN BUT NEVER COMPUTED 81 minutes with Roger Penrose -- the Oxford physicist who won a Nobel for his work on black holes and general relativity. -> His claim: whatever consciousness is, it is not a computation. A machine following rules can imitate understanding, but never actually have it. He builds it on Gödel: a human can just "see" that certain statements are true, even though no algorithm can ever prove them. That seeing, he argues, is non-computational. If he is right, understanding is not something you scale into. You can stack a trillion parameters and still have zero awareness underneath. Which cuts straight through the AI moment. Everyone assumes bigger models will eventually "wake up". Penrose says that is a category error -- more computation is still just computation. You thought intelligence and understanding were the same thing. This is the conversation that pulls them apart. Save this. It is the sharpest case against the hype ↓

slash1s

275,880 views • 1 month ago