正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

🚨🚨🚨 Fellow Dlangarians, there is a fire on the mountain! 🔥🔥🔥 Today, Chef Chaskoko served up a scorching dish: leaked chats between Msayisayi (Mo Sayed) and General M Khan that directly drag Julius Malema into the kitchen. The digital trail heavily suggests that Sayed acted as the central middleman...

Miz_Ruraltarain's profile picture

Kwena Molekwa

85,781 subscribers

33,328 次观看 • 21 天前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治喜剧
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

KHAN, SAYED & MALEMA There was a parallel exchange between Major General Khan and Mr Julius Malema, intermediated by Mr Sayed. • On 15 June 2021, Mr Sayed forwarded to Major General Khan a message from Mr Julius Malema in the following terms: “Need to know the complaint in case no: SANDTON CAS 76/07/2019.” • He followed this up with a message explaining the source of this request: “Juju bru”. • At 16h57 on 15 June, Major General Khan obliged by providing an extract from the SAPS computerized case filing system with details of the name of the complainant in the case. A copy of the extract from the SAPS case filing system is attached. Major General Khan then also separately messaged Mr Sayed with not only the complainant’s name, but also his address. • The complainant in Sandton CAS 76/07/2019 was the curator of VBS Bank, Mr Anoush Rooplal. Mr Malema has been implicated in the VBS Bank scandal in the plea explanation affidavit of the former VBS Chair, Mr Tshifwa Matodzi who pleaded guilty and was sentenced to an effective 15 year term of imprisonment for his role in the scandal. Mr Matodzi stated in his plea explanation affidavit that, in an attempt to buy EFF political protection for VBS, he had paid bribes of millions of rands to Mr Malema and Mr Floyd Shivambu in the guise of making donations to the EFF. Source: Justice, Crime Prevention and Security
1:23

KHAN, SAYED & MALEMA There was a parallel exchange between Major General Khan and Mr Julius Malema, intermediated by Mr Sayed. • On 15 June 2021, Mr Sayed forwarded to Major General Khan a message from Mr Julius Malema in the following terms: “Need to know the complaint in case no: SANDTON CAS 76/07/2019.” • He followed this up with a message explaining the source of this request: “Juju bru”. • At 16h57 on 15 June, Major General Khan obliged by providing an extract from the SAPS computerized case filing system with details of the name of the complainant in the case. A copy of the extract from the SAPS case filing system is attached. Major General Khan then also separately messaged Mr Sayed with not only the complainant’s name, but also his address. • The complainant in Sandton CAS 76/07/2019 was the curator of VBS Bank, Mr Anoush Rooplal. Mr Malema has been implicated in the VBS Bank scandal in the plea explanation affidavit of the former VBS Chair, Mr Tshifwa Matodzi who pleaded guilty and was sentenced to an effective 15 year term of imprisonment for his role in the scandal. Mr Matodzi stated in his plea explanation affidavit that, in an attempt to buy EFF political protection for VBS, he had paid bribes of millions of rands to Mr Malema and Mr Floyd Shivambu in the guise of making donations to the EFF. Source: Justice, Crime Prevention and Security

Zintoh Mhlanga

22,018 次观看 • 1 个月前

Evidence leaders presented WhatsApp chats showing General Khan, via Mr. Sayed, coordinating with Mr. Malema to orchestrate the removal of the Inspector General of Intelligence. Khan drafted questions for Parliament, including: "Convicted drug dealer... claims to be close friends with you. Is this true?" and "What gratification does the Inspector General... enjoy from this person?" The aim was to trap the Inspector General into lying about his relationship with a convicted drug lord (Tomi Marimutu). Khan stated: "This should get him to lie. And in return, we can ask for his removal because he lied." The chats show Malema was directly involved in formulating questions, and a meeting between Malema, Khan, and Sayed was arranged for 20 June 2021. #MadlangaCommission
15:15

Evidence leaders presented WhatsApp chats showing General Khan, via Mr. Sayed, coordinating with Mr. Malema to orchestrate the removal of the Inspector General of Intelligence. Khan drafted questions for Parliament, including: "Convicted drug dealer... claims to be close friends with you. Is this true?" and "What gratification does the Inspector General... enjoy from this person?" The aim was to trap the Inspector General into lying about his relationship with a convicted drug lord (Tomi Marimutu). Khan stated: "This should get him to lie. And in return, we can ask for his removal because he lied." The chats show Malema was directly involved in formulating questions, and a meeting between Malema, Khan, and Sayed was arranged for 20 June 2021. #MadlangaCommission

IOL News

126,373 次观看 • 21 天前

Amit Chaudhary was the only son of his parents and only brother of his three elder sisters. He was about to gt married in Jan 2024. On the evening of 14th Sep he called his uncle and told him that the wife of the colonel at whose house he is posted as a House Help under Buddy system of Army is going to murder him. After three days the family received a call from SM of the unit who informed them that they are sending the dead body of Amit to Jammu. The family received the Body on 19th Sep and even now no one from the Army bothered to inform them about the cause and reason of his death. Family is alleging that Wife of the Colonel was forcing Amit to do things with her which he was not comfortable with. And that leads to his murder. Its such a serious allegation and if this is true its a shame for the entire force.
7:19

Amit Chaudhary was the only son of his parents and only brother of his three elder sisters. He was about to gt married in Jan 2024. On the evening of 14th Sep he called his uncle and told him that the wife of the colonel at whose house he is posted as a House Help under Buddy system of Army is going to murder him. After three days the family received a call from SM of the unit who informed them that they are sending the dead body of Amit to Jammu. The family received the Body on 19th Sep and even now no one from the Army bothered to inform them about the cause and reason of his death. Family is alleging that Wife of the Colonel was forcing Amit to do things with her which he was not comfortable with. And that leads to his murder. Its such a serious allegation and if this is true its a shame for the entire force.

NCMIndia Council For Men Affairs

31,186 次观看 • 2 年前

US Attorney Jeanine Pirro on case against alleged press dinner gunman: "We have a lot of evidence that indicates his intent... whether it was, you know, following what the president was doing, where he was going, to the day of the of the event at the hotel. Tracking on his phone: Is the president in the ballroom yet? Has the president sat down yet? What time will dinner be served? This is clearly — the president is a target. And make no mistake, it is not just the manifesto, it is his actions."
3:17

US Attorney Jeanine Pirro on case against alleged press dinner gunman: "We have a lot of evidence that indicates his intent... whether it was, you know, following what the president was doing, where he was going, to the day of the of the event at the hotel. Tracking on his phone: Is the president in the ballroom yet? Has the president sat down yet? What time will dinner be served? This is clearly — the president is a target. And make no mistake, it is not just the manifesto, it is his actions."

State of the Union

109,539 次观看 • 2 个月前

Is it true that when Saudi Crown Prince MBS lent his personal plane to Imran Khan for his trip to the U.S., Imran Khan and his team made critical remarks about MBS that were overheard by the Saudis, prompting MBS to take back his plane? If so, this perfectly encapsulates Imran Khan’s diplomatic record. From his provocative, offensive, and hollow speech against India’s Modi on occupied Kashmir at the UNGA, where he sounded more like a jihadi leader addressing a jirga in Waziristan than a statesman addressing the global leaders, to his suicidal attempt to form a "new Islamic bloc" with Turkey, Malaysia, and Iran, as well as his ill-advised comments about the Taliban after the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan, Imran Khan consistently failed to justify his position or leverage opportunities effectively. While I have no doubt that Imran Khan is the best option for the people of Pakistan, he lacked the diplomatic finesse needed to carve out a role for himself on the global stage. It's such a shame that a cricketing legend and a former prime minister of a country has no friends to support him today. If not for the efforts of overseas Pakistanis, you wouldn't be seeing the little attention he gets from American and some British politicians. I wish, as a prime minister, Imran Khan was advised by educated and intelligent people who helped him establish himself as a world leader, not surrounded by emotional idiots who sent him to interviews unprepared, turned every interaction with the international press a PR disaster, sent him to Russia on the day Putin brutally invaded Ukraine, and asked him to walk barefoot in Madina like an ignorant, overly emotional person. Worse, they facilitated the mismanagement of priceless, personalized gifts he received from foreign leaders at Toshakhana, selling them and tarnishing his reputation and relationships. I hope that if and when Imran Khan gets another chance, he has a better team and conducts himself as a more effective leader, not just for his people, but on the global stage.
0:25

Is it true that when Saudi Crown Prince MBS lent his personal plane to Imran Khan for his trip to the U.S., Imran Khan and his team made critical remarks about MBS that were overheard by the Saudis, prompting MBS to take back his plane? If so, this perfectly encapsulates Imran Khan’s diplomatic record. From his provocative, offensive, and hollow speech against India’s Modi on occupied Kashmir at the UNGA, where he sounded more like a jihadi leader addressing a jirga in Waziristan than a statesman addressing the global leaders, to his suicidal attempt to form a "new Islamic bloc" with Turkey, Malaysia, and Iran, as well as his ill-advised comments about the Taliban after the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan, Imran Khan consistently failed to justify his position or leverage opportunities effectively. While I have no doubt that Imran Khan is the best option for the people of Pakistan, he lacked the diplomatic finesse needed to carve out a role for himself on the global stage. It's such a shame that a cricketing legend and a former prime minister of a country has no friends to support him today. If not for the efforts of overseas Pakistanis, you wouldn't be seeing the little attention he gets from American and some British politicians. I wish, as a prime minister, Imran Khan was advised by educated and intelligent people who helped him establish himself as a world leader, not surrounded by emotional idiots who sent him to interviews unprepared, turned every interaction with the international press a PR disaster, sent him to Russia on the day Putin brutally invaded Ukraine, and asked him to walk barefoot in Madina like an ignorant, overly emotional person. Worse, they facilitated the mismanagement of priceless, personalized gifts he received from foreign leaders at Toshakhana, selling them and tarnishing his reputation and relationships. I hope that if and when Imran Khan gets another chance, he has a better team and conducts himself as a more effective leader, not just for his people, but on the global stage.

Pakistan Walli

150,057 次观看 • 1 年前

Gavin Newsom is not a politician; he is a pathological con artist who has turned the governance of California into a personal criminal enterprise so brazen it makes the mob look like amateurs. He is a public menace... The greasy hair, the fake smile that never reaches his dead, soulless eyes, and that smug, voice dripping with condescension. He is the physical embodiment of everything rotting America from within. While he lectures the rest of the nation on morality from his ivory tower, he is actually running a racketeering ring that would make Al Capone blush. He is a parasite of the highest order, feeding on the misery of a state he has systematically destroyed, turning California into a third-world wasteland of tent cities, open-air drug markets, and violent crime, all while he sips million-dollar wine in his Napa Valley estate. He is a fraud, a liar, and a thief, and his entire career is a testament to the fact that the American Left is nothing more than a syndicate of criminals protecting their own. The depth of his corruption is staggering, even by the low standards of modern politics. His former chief of staff, Dana Williamson, a woman he placed in the second-highest position in the state, was recently exposed as a felon who siphoned hundreds of thousands of dollars from campaign funds for personal luxuries. She bought Chanel bags, took private jets, and installed luxury home improvements while claiming it was campaign business. And Newsom wants us to believe he knew nothing? That he was just too busy "governing" to notice his right-hand man running a million-dollar fraud ring out of his office? It is a lie. He either knew and participated, making him a co-conspirator, or he was so incompetent he allowed it to happen, making him unfit for any position of trust. There is no middle ground. He is either a criminal or a fool, and given his track record, he is likely both. He is a man who has built a career on the backs of the vulnerable, using their suffering as a backdrop for his own enrichment. But the rot goes deeper than just his staff; it is embedded in his very DNA and extends directly to his household. Newsom has weaponized his position as Governor to create a pay-to-play scheme that is nothing short of treasonous. Through a loophole known as "behested payments," he has funneled millions of dollars from special interests directly to non-profits run by his wife, Jennifer Siebel Newsom. We are talking about millions from casino operators, utility monopolies, and healthcare giants who are simultaneously lobbying his office for favors. It is a classic extortion racket: give money to the First Family or expect nothing but hostility from the state. They call it charity; it is bribery, plain and simple. They call it philanthropy; it is a laundering scheme designed to hide the fact that he is selling the state of California to the highest bidder. He is a pimp for special interests, selling out the people he swore to protect for a handful of silver. His entire administration is a hive of scum and villainy, a testament to his belief that the law does not apply to him. He appointed Tom Girardi, a known embeeler and predator of the vulnerable, to his judicial selection committee. He placed Melahat Rafiei, a woman convicted of attempting to bribe public officials, on a state board. These are not mistakes; they are features of his regime. He rewards loyalty with public office and punishes dissent with the full force of the state. He is a man who has no regard for the rule of law, no respect for the people of California, and no shame in his relentless pursuit of power and wealth. He is a monster who has destroyed a once-great state, turning it into a nightmare of crime, poverty, and despair, all while he lives like a king. He is the enemy of the people, a traitor to his oath, and a danger to our society. The evidence is overwhelming, the pattern is clear, and the time for accountability is now. Federal investigators are closing in, subpoenas have been served, and the walls of his criminal empire are crumbling. He is scrambling, hiring high-priced lawyers and issuing denials, but the truth is out. He is a fraud, and his entire career is a lie. He is a man who has stolen from the poor to give to the rich, who has sacrificed the safety of children for political gain, and who has betrayed the trust of every single person who ever voted for him. He is a disgrace to humanity, a blight on our nation, and a symbol of everything that is wrong with the modern world. He must be stopped, he must be prosecuted, and he must be put behind bars where he belongs. Let us be clear: Gavin Newsom is not a public servant. He is a public menace. He is a man who has used his position to enrich himself and his family at the expense of the people he was elected to serve. He is a criminal who has evaded justice for too long, but his time is up. The people of California deserve better. The people of America deserve better. We must demand his immediate resignation, his full prosecution, and his permanent removal from public life. He is a cancer on our society, and we must cut him out before he spreads his disease any further. He is a liar, a thief, and a traitor, and he must be held accountable for his crimes. The world is watching. The era of Gavin Newsom is over, and good riddance to him. He is a reminder of what happens when we allow evil to go unchecked, and we must never let it happen again.
2:08

Gavin Newsom is not a politician; he is a pathological con artist who has turned the governance of California into a personal criminal enterprise so brazen it makes the mob look like amateurs. He is a public menace... The greasy hair, the fake smile that never reaches his dead, soulless eyes, and that smug, voice dripping with condescension. He is the physical embodiment of everything rotting America from within. While he lectures the rest of the nation on morality from his ivory tower, he is actually running a racketeering ring that would make Al Capone blush. He is a parasite of the highest order, feeding on the misery of a state he has systematically destroyed, turning California into a third-world wasteland of tent cities, open-air drug markets, and violent crime, all while he sips million-dollar wine in his Napa Valley estate. He is a fraud, a liar, and a thief, and his entire career is a testament to the fact that the American Left is nothing more than a syndicate of criminals protecting their own. The depth of his corruption is staggering, even by the low standards of modern politics. His former chief of staff, Dana Williamson, a woman he placed in the second-highest position in the state, was recently exposed as a felon who siphoned hundreds of thousands of dollars from campaign funds for personal luxuries. She bought Chanel bags, took private jets, and installed luxury home improvements while claiming it was campaign business. And Newsom wants us to believe he knew nothing? That he was just too busy "governing" to notice his right-hand man running a million-dollar fraud ring out of his office? It is a lie. He either knew and participated, making him a co-conspirator, or he was so incompetent he allowed it to happen, making him unfit for any position of trust. There is no middle ground. He is either a criminal or a fool, and given his track record, he is likely both. He is a man who has built a career on the backs of the vulnerable, using their suffering as a backdrop for his own enrichment. But the rot goes deeper than just his staff; it is embedded in his very DNA and extends directly to his household. Newsom has weaponized his position as Governor to create a pay-to-play scheme that is nothing short of treasonous. Through a loophole known as "behested payments," he has funneled millions of dollars from special interests directly to non-profits run by his wife, Jennifer Siebel Newsom. We are talking about millions from casino operators, utility monopolies, and healthcare giants who are simultaneously lobbying his office for favors. It is a classic extortion racket: give money to the First Family or expect nothing but hostility from the state. They call it charity; it is bribery, plain and simple. They call it philanthropy; it is a laundering scheme designed to hide the fact that he is selling the state of California to the highest bidder. He is a pimp for special interests, selling out the people he swore to protect for a handful of silver. His entire administration is a hive of scum and villainy, a testament to his belief that the law does not apply to him. He appointed Tom Girardi, a known embeeler and predator of the vulnerable, to his judicial selection committee. He placed Melahat Rafiei, a woman convicted of attempting to bribe public officials, on a state board. These are not mistakes; they are features of his regime. He rewards loyalty with public office and punishes dissent with the full force of the state. He is a man who has no regard for the rule of law, no respect for the people of California, and no shame in his relentless pursuit of power and wealth. He is a monster who has destroyed a once-great state, turning it into a nightmare of crime, poverty, and despair, all while he lives like a king. He is the enemy of the people, a traitor to his oath, and a danger to our society. The evidence is overwhelming, the pattern is clear, and the time for accountability is now. Federal investigators are closing in, subpoenas have been served, and the walls of his criminal empire are crumbling. He is scrambling, hiring high-priced lawyers and issuing denials, but the truth is out. He is a fraud, and his entire career is a lie. He is a man who has stolen from the poor to give to the rich, who has sacrificed the safety of children for political gain, and who has betrayed the trust of every single person who ever voted for him. He is a disgrace to humanity, a blight on our nation, and a symbol of everything that is wrong with the modern world. He must be stopped, he must be prosecuted, and he must be put behind bars where he belongs. Let us be clear: Gavin Newsom is not a public servant. He is a public menace. He is a man who has used his position to enrich himself and his family at the expense of the people he was elected to serve. He is a criminal who has evaded justice for too long, but his time is up. The people of California deserve better. The people of America deserve better. We must demand his immediate resignation, his full prosecution, and his permanent removal from public life. He is a cancer on our society, and we must cut him out before he spreads his disease any further. He is a liar, a thief, and a traitor, and he must be held accountable for his crimes. The world is watching. The era of Gavin Newsom is over, and good riddance to him. He is a reminder of what happens when we allow evil to go unchecked, and we must never let it happen again.

Saggezza Eterna

68,794 次观看 • 2 天前

Regarding Neil Ferguson “And so my conclusion from that is not that he was stupid or that he was doing bad science. He wasn't doing bad science. He was doing exactly what he needed to do and he was paid to do it and he did it knowingly and intentionally. So I think it's a mistake to go too deep into showing how these papers are scientifically wrong and he didn't consider this and he didn't consider that and the model is this and the model is that. From the beginning, the entire thing is just a piece of propaganda. So his job is to be a propagandist. And so anything that he puts out cannot be analyzed or considered as a scientific production. It is not a production of anything that has to do with science. It is a production of propaganda and public relations.” Debbie Lerman Episode 445 NEVER FORGET WHAT THEY DID TO US
0:52

Regarding Neil Ferguson “And so my conclusion from that is not that he was stupid or that he was doing bad science. He wasn't doing bad science. He was doing exactly what he needed to do and he was paid to do it and he did it knowingly and intentionally. So I think it's a mistake to go too deep into showing how these papers are scientifically wrong and he didn't consider this and he didn't consider that and the model is this and the model is that. From the beginning, the entire thing is just a piece of propaganda. So his job is to be a propagandist. And so anything that he puts out cannot be analyzed or considered as a scientific production. It is not a production of anything that has to do with science. It is a production of propaganda and public relations.” Debbie Lerman Episode 445 NEVER FORGET WHAT THEY DID TO US

Doc Malik

11,609 次观看 • 5 个月前

[WATCH] THE PRESIDENT WILL NOT RESIGN. When it comes to the President, there is always a distinctive role between him being the President of the party and the state. There are many factors that influence the state in terms of governance and stability. If the President is called upon by some to resign and he keeps quiet it can throw the state into a state of turmoil. I want to make it clear that the officials agreed with the President on his approach, he took us into confidence and explained the factors that led him to make that particular pronouncement. We believe that the President did the right thing in pronouncing in the best interest of South Africa that he will not be resigning. There was nothing in terms of the judgment that warranted the President to resign it was just mere calls made by individuals and political parties that wanted to throw our country into a state of turmoil, uncertainty and anxiety. So it was imperative that he focus on that. It was correct for him to tell the country that from where he is standing there is nothing in the judgement that states he has done any wrongdoing and what he is going to do with the options in front of him and he has made this public. The President will take the Section 89 Report on review based on the outcome of the judgment and the legal advice he has received. There are no daggers out for the President to resign just opportunistic elements. These elements do not know what they want, they want to impeach and want him to resign, they do know what they actually want. The veracity of the report has not been tested in any committee so they don’t have a basis for the President to resign.
6:07

[WATCH] THE PRESIDENT WILL NOT RESIGN. When it comes to the President, there is always a distinctive role between him being the President of the party and the state. There are many factors that influence the state in terms of governance and stability. If the President is called upon by some to resign and he keeps quiet it can throw the state into a state of turmoil. I want to make it clear that the officials agreed with the President on his approach, he took us into confidence and explained the factors that led him to make that particular pronouncement. We believe that the President did the right thing in pronouncing in the best interest of South Africa that he will not be resigning. There was nothing in terms of the judgment that warranted the President to resign it was just mere calls made by individuals and political parties that wanted to throw our country into a state of turmoil, uncertainty and anxiety. So it was imperative that he focus on that. It was correct for him to tell the country that from where he is standing there is nothing in the judgement that states he has done any wrongdoing and what he is going to do with the options in front of him and he has made this public. The President will take the Section 89 Report on review based on the outcome of the judgment and the legal advice he has received. There are no daggers out for the President to resign just opportunistic elements. These elements do not know what they want, they want to impeach and want him to resign, they do know what they actually want. The veracity of the report has not been tested in any committee so they don’t have a basis for the President to resign.

ANC SECRETARY GENERAL | Fikile Mbalula

21,983 次观看 • 2 个月前

So now we know why Julius Malema couldn't understand why Feroz Khan should appear before the Ad Hoc Committee. When I called for accountability over Major-General Feroz Khan in 2024, I wasn't met with answers instead I was met with a lawyer's letter demanding that I retract my statements and "cease and desist." The concerns were already there: questionable procurement, the Secret Service Account, alleged media smear campaigns, and allegations of defeating the ends of justice. Today, the Madlanga Commission heard evidence alleging that Khan used Julius Malema, through an intermediary, to table parliamentary questions aimed at pressuring the then Inspector-General of Intelligence. Even more interesting, Malema previously deposed an affidavit distancing himself from the contents of conversations between Khan and Mo Sayed. Yet today's evidence suggests he may have been far more involved than previously understood. Perhaps that's why there was such resistance in the Ad Hoc Committee to Khan being called to testify. Accountability only works when everyone is prepared to answer questions and not just ask them. Lawyer's letters may delay accountability, but they cannot replace it. 🎥 Watch the clip from the Ad Hoc Committee and decide for yourself whether it has aged as well as it was intended to.
0:58

So now we know why Julius Malema couldn't understand why Feroz Khan should appear before the Ad Hoc Committee. When I called for accountability over Major-General Feroz Khan in 2024, I wasn't met with answers instead I was met with a lawyer's letter demanding that I retract my statements and "cease and desist." The concerns were already there: questionable procurement, the Secret Service Account, alleged media smear campaigns, and allegations of defeating the ends of justice. Today, the Madlanga Commission heard evidence alleging that Khan used Julius Malema, through an intermediary, to table parliamentary questions aimed at pressuring the then Inspector-General of Intelligence. Even more interesting, Malema previously deposed an affidavit distancing himself from the contents of conversations between Khan and Mo Sayed. Yet today's evidence suggests he may have been far more involved than previously understood. Perhaps that's why there was such resistance in the Ad Hoc Committee to Khan being called to testify. Accountability only works when everyone is prepared to answer questions and not just ask them. Lawyer's letters may delay accountability, but they cannot replace it. 🎥 Watch the clip from the Ad Hoc Committee and decide for yourself whether it has aged as well as it was intended to.

Ian Cameron

262,716 次观看 • 20 天前

🚨 GENERAL KHAN IS FINISHED, CHOMIS! 🚨 "The drugs belonged to General Khan, and that explains his behaviour on the day of the bust." Yoh, my fellow Dlangarians, indaba ikhona—I am completely defeated! Please watch and listen to this skandaal! At this point, General Khan needs to pack away his gym clothes sharp-sharp. He will have decades to pump iron behind bars! Instead, he must dedicate his few remaining days of fleshing to pure luxury. Here is his official "Last Days of Freedom" itinerary: ● 4:00 AM: Wake up and soak in a hot bath with bath salts and candles to calm those prison jitters. ● 5:00 AM: First breakfast—steaming Idli and Sambar. ● 9:00 AM: Second breakfast—crispy Masala Dosa, asvaais with rotis in between. ● 12:00 PM: Lunch—rich Butter Chicken and Dal Makhani, chased down with hot samoosas. ● 3:00 PM: Second lunch—heavy Chole Bhature because time is running out! After eating, he needs to take a long, slow swim while sipping his most expensive bubbly. Finally, the grand finale: a massive family dinner featuring Rogan Josh and Basmati rice. But forget the small talk, General! This is the moment to spit the real banyana. Pass over the banking PINs. Disclose the hidden skorokoro businesses. Reveal where the secret moolah is stashed. 😆 🤣 The family is going to need every single cent to survive this nyuku shortage! 💸 He better breathe in the fresh air and enjoy every bite while he can, because iyoooooh! Grootman is going straight to tshini! #MadlangaCommission #ProtectGeneralMkhwanazi
4:36

🚨 GENERAL KHAN IS FINISHED, CHOMIS! 🚨 "The drugs belonged to General Khan, and that explains his behaviour on the day of the bust." Yoh, my fellow Dlangarians, indaba ikhona—I am completely defeated! Please watch and listen to this skandaal! At this point, General Khan needs to pack away his gym clothes sharp-sharp. He will have decades to pump iron behind bars! Instead, he must dedicate his few remaining days of fleshing to pure luxury. Here is his official "Last Days of Freedom" itinerary: ● 4:00 AM: Wake up and soak in a hot bath with bath salts and candles to calm those prison jitters. ● 5:00 AM: First breakfast—steaming Idli and Sambar. ● 9:00 AM: Second breakfast—crispy Masala Dosa, asvaais with rotis in between. ● 12:00 PM: Lunch—rich Butter Chicken and Dal Makhani, chased down with hot samoosas. ● 3:00 PM: Second lunch—heavy Chole Bhature because time is running out! After eating, he needs to take a long, slow swim while sipping his most expensive bubbly. Finally, the grand finale: a massive family dinner featuring Rogan Josh and Basmati rice. But forget the small talk, General! This is the moment to spit the real banyana. Pass over the banking PINs. Disclose the hidden skorokoro businesses. Reveal where the secret moolah is stashed. 😆 🤣 The family is going to need every single cent to survive this nyuku shortage! 💸 He better breathe in the fresh air and enjoy every bite while he can, because iyoooooh! Grootman is going straight to tshini! #MadlangaCommission #ProtectGeneralMkhwanazi

Kwena Molekwa

148,710 次观看 • 2 个月前

It is a pleasure to be with you this evening to celebrate the memory and contribution of our first Prime Minister, Pt. Jawaharlal Nehru. He was the prime architect of the modern Indian nation-state. His was a life anchored firmly in parliamentary democracy. He had a steadfast belief in planned economic growth and a profound commitment to the development of scientific temper alongside the development of scientific and technological capabilities. To him, secularism — in which he firmly believed — meant the celebration of India’s many diversities while strengthening its fundamental unity. His legacy continues to shape our everyday lives. Decades have gone by since his time, but he continues to serve as a beacon of light to millions of our countrymen and women. It is inevitable that such a monumental figure will have his life and work analysed and critiqued — and that is indeed as it should be. Although the temptation to divorce him from his times and the challenges that he had to face and to look at him, devoid of the historical context in which he functioned has become quite widespread. Yet, while we welcome ongoing analysis of his contributions, what is not acceptable is the systematic attempt being made to denigrate, distort, demean and defame him. The sole objective of this is to not only diminish him as a personality but also his universally recognised role in India's independence struggle and his early decades as a leader of an independent nation challenged by unprecedented problems, but it is also to demolish his multifaceted legacy in a crude and self-serving attempt to rewrite history. Analysis is one thing, but deliberate mischief with what he said, what he wrote and what he did is another thing and totally unacceptable. And who are the forces that have launched this project? We all know that they have worked for years and years—for decades—and finally, here they are. They belong to an ideology that had no role whatsoever in our freedom movement, that had no role whatsoever in the making of our Constitution. In fact, they even burnt it and were totally against it. It is an ideology that long ago fanned an atmosphere of hate that ultimately led to the assassination of Mahatma Gandhi ji. His killers today continue to be glorified by its adherents. It is an ideology that has consistently rejected the ideals of our founding fathers. It is an ideology with a bigoted and viciously communal outlook. Its approach to nationhood is based on stoking prejudices of all kinds. Let there be no doubt whatsoever that the project to vilify Jawaharlal Nehru ji is the main objective of the ruling establishment today. Their goal is not just to erase him; it is actually to destroy the social, political, and economic foundations on which our nation has been founded and built. The road ahead is not easy. But there is simply no option but for each one of us, individually and collectively, to stand up and confront this project. We not only owe it to the memory of Jawaharlal Nehru ji and his comrades—we owe it to ourselves, and even more to the coming generations. The unapologetic and fierce defence of the Nehruvian legacy is not an act of nostalgia. It is a commitment to restoring India's constitutional promise, to safeguarding reason in the face of propaganda, and to ensuring that our republic remains modern and forward-looking. If we succeed, it will not only honour Jawaharlal Nehru ji's memory; it will ensure that the India he envisioned remains a reality. At a time when tolerance in public life is shrinking, when dissent is painted as disloyalty, and history is reduced to partisan combat, Nehru ji's example becomes even more vital. He taught us that disagreement is not a threat but a democratic necessity—that unity does not demand uniformity; that a confident nation need not fear the truth about its past. Friends, there is some reason for hope. Last month, the Jawaharlal Nehru Memorial Fund also launched an archive which can be accessed at The archive is an easily searchable and freely downloadable digital archive—also, by the way, accessible on your smartphone. At present, it covers the hundred published volumes of his selected works, covering the period from 1903 till the day before he died. The archive will continue to expand. So, there it will be for you all to access any time you want to know something about what he said, what he wrote, or what he did. Sandeep Dixit's initiative, which has brought all of us here this evening, is another sincere attempt to take on this challenge of rescuing Nehru ji from the web of deception. And we need many, many more such initiatives across the length and breadth of our country. I will end by congratulating Sandeep and his team and wishing him and his colleagues the very best in their endeavours. Jai Hind! : CPP Chairperson Smt. Sonia Gandhi ji at the launch of The Nehru Centre India
9:38

It is a pleasure to be with you this evening to celebrate the memory and contribution of our first Prime Minister, Pt. Jawaharlal Nehru. He was the prime architect of the modern Indian nation-state. His was a life anchored firmly in parliamentary democracy. He had a steadfast belief in planned economic growth and a profound commitment to the development of scientific temper alongside the development of scientific and technological capabilities. To him, secularism — in which he firmly believed — meant the celebration of India’s many diversities while strengthening its fundamental unity. His legacy continues to shape our everyday lives. Decades have gone by since his time, but he continues to serve as a beacon of light to millions of our countrymen and women. It is inevitable that such a monumental figure will have his life and work analysed and critiqued — and that is indeed as it should be. Although the temptation to divorce him from his times and the challenges that he had to face and to look at him, devoid of the historical context in which he functioned has become quite widespread. Yet, while we welcome ongoing analysis of his contributions, what is not acceptable is the systematic attempt being made to denigrate, distort, demean and defame him. The sole objective of this is to not only diminish him as a personality but also his universally recognised role in India's independence struggle and his early decades as a leader of an independent nation challenged by unprecedented problems, but it is also to demolish his multifaceted legacy in a crude and self-serving attempt to rewrite history. Analysis is one thing, but deliberate mischief with what he said, what he wrote and what he did is another thing and totally unacceptable. And who are the forces that have launched this project? We all know that they have worked for years and years—for decades—and finally, here they are. They belong to an ideology that had no role whatsoever in our freedom movement, that had no role whatsoever in the making of our Constitution. In fact, they even burnt it and were totally against it. It is an ideology that long ago fanned an atmosphere of hate that ultimately led to the assassination of Mahatma Gandhi ji. His killers today continue to be glorified by its adherents. It is an ideology that has consistently rejected the ideals of our founding fathers. It is an ideology with a bigoted and viciously communal outlook. Its approach to nationhood is based on stoking prejudices of all kinds. Let there be no doubt whatsoever that the project to vilify Jawaharlal Nehru ji is the main objective of the ruling establishment today. Their goal is not just to erase him; it is actually to destroy the social, political, and economic foundations on which our nation has been founded and built. The road ahead is not easy. But there is simply no option but for each one of us, individually and collectively, to stand up and confront this project. We not only owe it to the memory of Jawaharlal Nehru ji and his comrades—we owe it to ourselves, and even more to the coming generations. The unapologetic and fierce defence of the Nehruvian legacy is not an act of nostalgia. It is a commitment to restoring India's constitutional promise, to safeguarding reason in the face of propaganda, and to ensuring that our republic remains modern and forward-looking. If we succeed, it will not only honour Jawaharlal Nehru ji's memory; it will ensure that the India he envisioned remains a reality. At a time when tolerance in public life is shrinking, when dissent is painted as disloyalty, and history is reduced to partisan combat, Nehru ji's example becomes even more vital. He taught us that disagreement is not a threat but a democratic necessity—that unity does not demand uniformity; that a confident nation need not fear the truth about its past. Friends, there is some reason for hope. Last month, the Jawaharlal Nehru Memorial Fund also launched an archive which can be accessed at The archive is an easily searchable and freely downloadable digital archive—also, by the way, accessible on your smartphone. At present, it covers the hundred published volumes of his selected works, covering the period from 1903 till the day before he died. The archive will continue to expand. So, there it will be for you all to access any time you want to know something about what he said, what he wrote, or what he did. Sandeep Dixit's initiative, which has brought all of us here this evening, is another sincere attempt to take on this challenge of rescuing Nehru ji from the web of deception. And we need many, many more such initiatives across the length and breadth of our country. I will end by congratulating Sandeep and his team and wishing him and his colleagues the very best in their endeavours. Jai Hind! : CPP Chairperson Smt. Sonia Gandhi ji at the launch of The Nehru Centre India

Congress

45,430 次观看 • 7 个月前

VIDEO | Actor Saif Ali Khan says producer Shah Rukh Khan gave the team of "Kartavya" a free hand to make the film the way they wanted. In fact, Shah Rukh was the one who called Saif to inform about the script that they were developing at Red Chillies. "He said, ‘There’s a lovely script, and I would like you to hear it, and do it’. Then I listened to it and met the director. Once the film was complete, he said, ‘It has come out as a lovely movie’. He was very happy,” Saif said. “Sometimes the presence (of Shah Rukh) can be overwhelming on sets and I think he understands that. He gave us room to make the film on our own. I felt I was working for his production with his kind of sensibility,” the actor added. Directed by Pulkit of "Bhakshak" fame, the film stars Rasika Dugal opposite Saif and the actor said he is a huge fan of the "Mirzapur" star. #ShahRukhKhan
1:03

VIDEO | Actor Saif Ali Khan says producer Shah Rukh Khan gave the team of "Kartavya" a free hand to make the film the way they wanted. In fact, Shah Rukh was the one who called Saif to inform about the script that they were developing at Red Chillies. "He said, ‘There’s a lovely script, and I would like you to hear it, and do it’. Then I listened to it and met the director. Once the film was complete, he said, ‘It has come out as a lovely movie’. He was very happy,” Saif said. “Sometimes the presence (of Shah Rukh) can be overwhelming on sets and I think he understands that. He gave us room to make the film on our own. I felt I was working for his production with his kind of sensibility,” the actor added. Directed by Pulkit of "Bhakshak" fame, the film stars Rasika Dugal opposite Saif and the actor said he is a huge fan of the "Mirzapur" star. #ShahRukhKhan

Press Trust of India

252,018 次观看 • 2 个月前

The clearest evidence that Nelson Chamisa learnt nothing and forgot everything during his two-year hiatus, after he unceremoniously ran away from the leadership of his party in January 2024, is that he says he’s back in active politics to form and lead yet another “new” movement which he "shockingly claims will be similar to the 'liberation movement, that had no president and no constitution': Journalist: "And is this an announcement of the coming in of a new political party, or it's going to be a general movement; exactly what is this?" Nelson Chamisa: "I think I must help you. I said it's not a political party. It's a movement. It is, and a movement is like the liberation movement. Who was the president of the liberation movement? What was the constitution of the liberation movement?" [full video:
0:24

The clearest evidence that Nelson Chamisa learnt nothing and forgot everything during his two-year hiatus, after he unceremoniously ran away from the leadership of his party in January 2024, is that he says he’s back in active politics to form and lead yet another “new” movement which he "shockingly claims will be similar to the 'liberation movement, that had no president and no constitution': Journalist: "And is this an announcement of the coming in of a new political party, or it's going to be a general movement; exactly what is this?" Nelson Chamisa: "I think I must help you. I said it's not a political party. It's a movement. It is, and a movement is like the liberation movement. Who was the president of the liberation movement? What was the constitution of the liberation movement?" [full video:

Prof Jonathan Moyo

61,128 次观看 • 6 个月前

Prof Makau Mutua: I don’t understand why Sifuna is fighting to keep on sucking on mama’s titty of ODM. He should get the hell out. He should not waste time there; he does not like the party. ODM will outlast him. Sifuna was picked by Baba from political obscurity and made the SG of the party. His ingratitude is wrangling. He is a young man; he should be humble, and he should learn how to conduct himself. You cannot go to a political party like that and start threatening it when you are only 2 days old in the party #CitizenSundayLive
1:08

Prof Makau Mutua: I don’t understand why Sifuna is fighting to keep on sucking on mama’s titty of ODM. He should get the hell out. He should not waste time there; he does not like the party. ODM will outlast him. Sifuna was picked by Baba from political obscurity and made the SG of the party. His ingratitude is wrangling. He is a young man; he should be humble, and he should learn how to conduct himself. You cannot go to a political party like that and start threatening it when you are only 2 days old in the party #CitizenSundayLive

Citizen TV Kenya

56,436 次观看 • 1 个月前

Andrei Tarkovsky on Ingmar Bergman's Shame (1968): "Let us look at Bergman's Shame. The film doesn't contain a single 'actor's piece' for the performer to 'give away' the director's purpose, to play the conception of the persona, his attitude to it, to assess it in relation to the overall idea; and the latter is entirely hidden within the dynamic of the characters' lives, at one with it. The people in the film are crushed by circumstances; they act only in accordance with their situation, to which they themselves are subordinate; they make no attempt to proffer us any idea, any perspective on what is happening, or to draw any conclusion. All of that is left to the film as a whole, to the director's vision. And how superbly it is accomplished! You cannot say in simple terms who amongst them is good or bad. I could never say that von Sydow is a bad man. They are all partly good and partly bad, each in his own way. No judgements are passed, because there is no hint of tendentiousness in any of the actors, and the circumstances of the film are used by the director to explore the human possibilities which they test, and not for a moment in order to illustrate a thesis. Max von Sydow's character is developed with masterly power. He is a very good man; a musician; kind and sensitive. It turns out that he is a coward. But by no means every bold man is a good human being, and cowards are not always scoundrels. Of course, he is weak and irresolute. His wife is far stronger than he, so much so that she can overcome her fear. The hero lacks that strength. He is tormented by his own weakness, vulnerability, lack of resilience; he tries to hide, to cower in a corner, not to see and not to hear; and he does this like a child, naively and with complete sincerity. But when circumstances nevertheless force him to defend himself, he instantly turns into a scoundrel. He loses all that was best in him; but the drama and absurdity of his situation is that as he is now he becomes necessary to his wife, who, in her turn, looks to him for protection and succour instead of despising him as she always had. When he beats her about the face and says 'Get out!' she goes crawling after him. There is something here of the age-old idea of passive good and active evil; but its expression is immensely complex. At the beginning of the film the hero cannot even kill a chicken, but as soon as he has found a way of defending himself he becomes a cruel cynic. He has something of Hamlet: my view is that the Prince of Denmark perishes not as a result of the duel, when he dies physically, but immediately after the 'rat' scene, when he understands how irreversible are those laws of life which have forced him, a man of humanity and intellect, to act like the inferior people who inhabit Elsinore. Von Sydow is now a sinister character, afraid of nothing: he kills; will not raise a finger to save his fellows; pursues only his own interests. The point is that you have to be a person of great integrity to feel fear in the face of the foul necessity to kill and humiliate. And by shedding that fear and apparently acquiring courage, a person in fact loses his spiritual strength and intellectual honesty and parts from his innocence. War is the obvious catalyst for the cruel, anti-human elements in people. Bergman uses the war in this film exactly as he uses the heroine's illness in Through a Glass Darkly: to explore his view of man." — "Sculpting in Time" by Andrei Tarkovsky (translated by Kitty Hunter-Blair, 1987)
0:50

Andrei Tarkovsky on Ingmar Bergman's Shame (1968): "Let us look at Bergman's Shame. The film doesn't contain a single 'actor's piece' for the performer to 'give away' the director's purpose, to play the conception of the persona, his attitude to it, to assess it in relation to the overall idea; and the latter is entirely hidden within the dynamic of the characters' lives, at one with it. The people in the film are crushed by circumstances; they act only in accordance with their situation, to which they themselves are subordinate; they make no attempt to proffer us any idea, any perspective on what is happening, or to draw any conclusion. All of that is left to the film as a whole, to the director's vision. And how superbly it is accomplished! You cannot say in simple terms who amongst them is good or bad. I could never say that von Sydow is a bad man. They are all partly good and partly bad, each in his own way. No judgements are passed, because there is no hint of tendentiousness in any of the actors, and the circumstances of the film are used by the director to explore the human possibilities which they test, and not for a moment in order to illustrate a thesis. Max von Sydow's character is developed with masterly power. He is a very good man; a musician; kind and sensitive. It turns out that he is a coward. But by no means every bold man is a good human being, and cowards are not always scoundrels. Of course, he is weak and irresolute. His wife is far stronger than he, so much so that she can overcome her fear. The hero lacks that strength. He is tormented by his own weakness, vulnerability, lack of resilience; he tries to hide, to cower in a corner, not to see and not to hear; and he does this like a child, naively and with complete sincerity. But when circumstances nevertheless force him to defend himself, he instantly turns into a scoundrel. He loses all that was best in him; but the drama and absurdity of his situation is that as he is now he becomes necessary to his wife, who, in her turn, looks to him for protection and succour instead of despising him as she always had. When he beats her about the face and says 'Get out!' she goes crawling after him. There is something here of the age-old idea of passive good and active evil; but its expression is immensely complex. At the beginning of the film the hero cannot even kill a chicken, but as soon as he has found a way of defending himself he becomes a cruel cynic. He has something of Hamlet: my view is that the Prince of Denmark perishes not as a result of the duel, when he dies physically, but immediately after the 'rat' scene, when he understands how irreversible are those laws of life which have forced him, a man of humanity and intellect, to act like the inferior people who inhabit Elsinore. Von Sydow is now a sinister character, afraid of nothing: he kills; will not raise a finger to save his fellows; pursues only his own interests. The point is that you have to be a person of great integrity to feel fear in the face of the foul necessity to kill and humiliate. And by shedding that fear and apparently acquiring courage, a person in fact loses his spiritual strength and intellectual honesty and parts from his innocence. War is the obvious catalyst for the cruel, anti-human elements in people. Bergman uses the war in this film exactly as he uses the heroine's illness in Through a Glass Darkly: to explore his view of man." — "Sculpting in Time" by Andrei Tarkovsky (translated by Kitty Hunter-Blair, 1987)

RadiantFilm

27,723 次观看 • 5 个月前

In a speech in Durban, disgraced Adv Dali Mpofu blast Julius Malema. Dali said in a one on one meeting Jacob Zuma had with Julius Malema in which he was present, Dali said “every agreement Julius Malema made with Jacob Zuma, Julius did not keep his word’ Surprisingly he also implied that even before the election, MK was going to dispute the results and Zuma wanted Julius to Support this. Jacob Zuma has always been a thief, we all know that, Dali was EFF then, but working internally to break up the EFF. Dali Mpofu said Zuma is still upset with Julius Malema for accepting the elections and saying it was free and fair, it’s the will of the people and we fully respect it. Dali Mpofu is not only a disgrace to the legal profession but also a disgrace in politics. He was stabbing Malema and putting salt in the wounds to make it more painful, sadly Malema did not pick it up. Shameless political prostitute is the only way you be can describe Dali Mpofu.
0:32

In a speech in Durban, disgraced Adv Dali Mpofu blast Julius Malema. Dali said in a one on one meeting Jacob Zuma had with Julius Malema in which he was present, Dali said “every agreement Julius Malema made with Jacob Zuma, Julius did not keep his word’ Surprisingly he also implied that even before the election, MK was going to dispute the results and Zuma wanted Julius to Support this. Jacob Zuma has always been a thief, we all know that, Dali was EFF then, but working internally to break up the EFF. Dali Mpofu said Zuma is still upset with Julius Malema for accepting the elections and saying it was free and fair, it’s the will of the people and we fully respect it. Dali Mpofu is not only a disgrace to the legal profession but also a disgrace in politics. He was stabbing Malema and putting salt in the wounds to make it more painful, sadly Malema did not pick it up. Shameless political prostitute is the only way you be can describe Dali Mpofu.

Goolam

47,366 次观看 • 1 年前

RFK Jr. was previously asked about how it felt to be condemned by his own family. He told a story about how his father gave him a book just two weeks before he died. RFK said he read the book multiple times, trying to figure out what lesson his dad wanted to give him. Here is what he said: "Camus had written this book called The Plague. My father gave it to me and he told me, with this kind of peculiar intensity, 'I want you to read this'." "He said this with this directness that after he died, I ended up reading that book about three times, trying to figure out kind of what the message was that he was trying to give me." Breakdown of the book: - "The Plague" is set in a North African city hit by an unprecedented plague. - The city is quarantined, and the story begins with a focus on the doctor's internal conflict. - The doctor initially considers not helping because there is no treatment the unknown disease. - Despite the risks, the doctor decides to comfort and serve the people. - Camus, an existentialist, draws from Stoicism, focusing on duty and service. - The doctor's actions bring order to the chaos, reflecting Stoic philosophy. - RFK then discussed Sisyphus, a figure in Stoicism, who is happy despite his eternal, futile task. - Sisyphus's happiness comes from fulfilling his duty (protecting people from a rolling stone), regardless of the outcome. "For eternity [he] pushes a rock up a hill. He can never get it over the top. It always rolls back down and on top of him. And then he goes up and does it again," RFK said. "Sisyphus is a happy man because he put his shoulder to the stone. He was given a duty and he does his duty. And that self-sacrifice that he makes, brings order to a chaotic universe." "So for me to have kind of a concrete task that I know is right, and I'm open to criticism, I have a critical mind. If somebody shows me where I got it wrong, I'll change. I'm not dug in, I'm not hardheaded in that sense." "But until somebody shows me that I'm gonna try to help these children and, you know, and I feel like it's a gift. So, and the more people that abuse me, the bigger the gift is in some way." Video: Liam McCollum
4:08

RFK Jr. was previously asked about how it felt to be condemned by his own family. He told a story about how his father gave him a book just two weeks before he died. RFK said he read the book multiple times, trying to figure out what lesson his dad wanted to give him. Here is what he said: "Camus had written this book called The Plague. My father gave it to me and he told me, with this kind of peculiar intensity, 'I want you to read this'." "He said this with this directness that after he died, I ended up reading that book about three times, trying to figure out kind of what the message was that he was trying to give me." Breakdown of the book: - "The Plague" is set in a North African city hit by an unprecedented plague. - The city is quarantined, and the story begins with a focus on the doctor's internal conflict. - The doctor initially considers not helping because there is no treatment the unknown disease. - Despite the risks, the doctor decides to comfort and serve the people. - Camus, an existentialist, draws from Stoicism, focusing on duty and service. - The doctor's actions bring order to the chaos, reflecting Stoic philosophy. - RFK then discussed Sisyphus, a figure in Stoicism, who is happy despite his eternal, futile task. - Sisyphus's happiness comes from fulfilling his duty (protecting people from a rolling stone), regardless of the outcome. "For eternity [he] pushes a rock up a hill. He can never get it over the top. It always rolls back down and on top of him. And then he goes up and does it again," RFK said. "Sisyphus is a happy man because he put his shoulder to the stone. He was given a duty and he does his duty. And that self-sacrifice that he makes, brings order to a chaotic universe." "So for me to have kind of a concrete task that I know is right, and I'm open to criticism, I have a critical mind. If somebody shows me where I got it wrong, I'll change. I'm not dug in, I'm not hardheaded in that sense." "But until somebody shows me that I'm gonna try to help these children and, you know, and I feel like it's a gift. So, and the more people that abuse me, the bigger the gift is in some way." Video: Liam McCollum

Collin Rugg

4,341,608 次观看 • 1 年前

Sometimes as fans, we are mostly focused on how the achievements of the team means to us and we forget about the players. How they feel about it, what it means for them to win these games. Take Noni Madueke for instance, his transfer to Arsenal was a mess. A lot of the fans didn't understand the move and there was a lot of displeasure about it online. How do you think that made Madueke feel? This is a guy who was on top of his game in the Netherlands before moving to Chelsea and everything changed for him. He went from a confident dribbling monster, fighting for silverware to whatever he was at Chelsea, a shadow of himself. Now he has won the league in his first season at Arsenal and made the world cup squad for England. Arteta is not only saving the lives of the fans, he is also saving the lives of his players. Thank you Arteta.
0:38

Sometimes as fans, we are mostly focused on how the achievements of the team means to us and we forget about the players. How they feel about it, what it means for them to win these games. Take Noni Madueke for instance, his transfer to Arsenal was a mess. A lot of the fans didn't understand the move and there was a lot of displeasure about it online. How do you think that made Madueke feel? This is a guy who was on top of his game in the Netherlands before moving to Chelsea and everything changed for him. He went from a confident dribbling monster, fighting for silverware to whatever he was at Chelsea, a shadow of himself. Now he has won the league in his first season at Arsenal and made the world cup squad for England. Arteta is not only saving the lives of the fans, he is also saving the lives of his players. Thank you Arteta.

Friday

37,026 次观看 • 2 个月前

🚨🚨 THE PLOT THICKENS: LET’S TALK ABOUT WITNESS “I”! 🚨🚨 Heish, family, please don’t even get me started on that IPID lady today, she completely exhausts me! She clearly only showed up to Madlanga’s kitchen to drink our purified water, waste our oxygen, and leave us parched for real answers. Let’s leave her right there.Because today? We need to talk about Witness “I”. This man walked into the commission, looked the country in the eye, and confirmed exactly what my gut has been telling me all along. Validation never felt so heavy.If you remember my initial theory, I told you that Major General Khan and General Kadwa swooped into that Aeroton drug bust scene like they owned it. But who was already on the ground doing the dirty work? Warrant Officer Magane, Chief Mashaba, Warrant Officer Phakula, and their informant, Mr. Tumelo Nku. Now, look... we already know that first crew had their own creative plans for those drugs, but let me keep my mouth zipped on that for a second... 🤐 Envy is a terrible thing, but greed? Greed is a monster.Generals Khan and Kadwa were visibly irritated to their very core. Why? Because they got completely outsmarted and beaten at their own game by junior amateurs! Imagine the bruised egos in that room. So, what did they do? They hijacked the scene, started bossing everyone around, and completely ignored Lt-Col Sebola an actual expert who actually knew what he was doing. Generals Khan and Kadwa were visibly irritated to their very core. Why? Because they got completely outsmarted and beaten at their own game by junior amateurs! Imagine the bruised egos in that room. So, what did they do? They hijacked the scene, started bossing everyone around, and completely ignored Lt-Col Sebola an actual expert who actually knew what he was doing. But it gets darker. Witness “I” dropped an absolute bombshell yesterday: ■ General Khan allegedly removed the truck driver from the scene and helped him vanish into thin ■ Witness “I” openly admitted that certain senior managers within SAPS are actively sleeping in the same bed as the drug cartels. This is exactly why his team keeps their operations under lock and key, you can’t trust the person sitting next to you! ■ When "Mama Sesla" (Advocate Sesi Baloyi SC) pressed him for a name, he didn't blink. He pointed straight at a 'Colonel Bok.' But wait, there's more! They tried to buy his silence. Witness “I” revealed he was offered a "handsome reward", packaged nicely as a promotion. If he just agreed to alter his statement and protect Khan. Let that sink in. The system tried to reward corruption, but he chose integrity.Witness “I” didn’t just take the stand; he came to bury the General and his entire cabal. He made it clear that intelligence reports show Major General Khan is notorious for overseeing drug syndicates flooding in from KZN. Honestly, I think the commissioners already know exactly who they are dealing with. They are patiently spinning a web, collecting every single receipt, and building a watertight case. The day General Khan finally steps into Madlanga’s kitchen, it will be the last time he ever sees the light of day. Because where he is going after this? Kukhala amadoda, only real men cry there! 🔒But as emotionally taxing as this betrayal of public trust is, we still have to be fair. We need to hear what he has to say for himself. For now, grab your popcorn, sit back, and let’s watch the wheels of justice turn slowly. #MadlangaCommission #ProtectGeneralMkhwanazi
13:13

🚨🚨 THE PLOT THICKENS: LET’S TALK ABOUT WITNESS “I”! 🚨🚨 Heish, family, please don’t even get me started on that IPID lady today, she completely exhausts me! She clearly only showed up to Madlanga’s kitchen to drink our purified water, waste our oxygen, and leave us parched for real answers. Let’s leave her right there.Because today? We need to talk about Witness “I”. This man walked into the commission, looked the country in the eye, and confirmed exactly what my gut has been telling me all along. Validation never felt so heavy.If you remember my initial theory, I told you that Major General Khan and General Kadwa swooped into that Aeroton drug bust scene like they owned it. But who was already on the ground doing the dirty work? Warrant Officer Magane, Chief Mashaba, Warrant Officer Phakula, and their informant, Mr. Tumelo Nku. Now, look... we already know that first crew had their own creative plans for those drugs, but let me keep my mouth zipped on that for a second... 🤐 Envy is a terrible thing, but greed? Greed is a monster.Generals Khan and Kadwa were visibly irritated to their very core. Why? Because they got completely outsmarted and beaten at their own game by junior amateurs! Imagine the bruised egos in that room. So, what did they do? They hijacked the scene, started bossing everyone around, and completely ignored Lt-Col Sebola an actual expert who actually knew what he was doing. Generals Khan and Kadwa were visibly irritated to their very core. Why? Because they got completely outsmarted and beaten at their own game by junior amateurs! Imagine the bruised egos in that room. So, what did they do? They hijacked the scene, started bossing everyone around, and completely ignored Lt-Col Sebola an actual expert who actually knew what he was doing. But it gets darker. Witness “I” dropped an absolute bombshell yesterday: ■ General Khan allegedly removed the truck driver from the scene and helped him vanish into thin ■ Witness “I” openly admitted that certain senior managers within SAPS are actively sleeping in the same bed as the drug cartels. This is exactly why his team keeps their operations under lock and key, you can’t trust the person sitting next to you! ■ When "Mama Sesla" (Advocate Sesi Baloyi SC) pressed him for a name, he didn't blink. He pointed straight at a 'Colonel Bok.' But wait, there's more! They tried to buy his silence. Witness “I” revealed he was offered a "handsome reward", packaged nicely as a promotion. If he just agreed to alter his statement and protect Khan. Let that sink in. The system tried to reward corruption, but he chose integrity.Witness “I” didn’t just take the stand; he came to bury the General and his entire cabal. He made it clear that intelligence reports show Major General Khan is notorious for overseeing drug syndicates flooding in from KZN. Honestly, I think the commissioners already know exactly who they are dealing with. They are patiently spinning a web, collecting every single receipt, and building a watertight case. The day General Khan finally steps into Madlanga’s kitchen, it will be the last time he ever sees the light of day. Because where he is going after this? Kukhala amadoda, only real men cry there! 🔒But as emotionally taxing as this betrayal of public trust is, we still have to be fair. We need to hear what he has to say for himself. For now, grab your popcorn, sit back, and let’s watch the wheels of justice turn slowly. #MadlangaCommission #ProtectGeneralMkhwanazi

Kwena Molekwa

22,343 次观看 • 1 个月前

Garry Kasparov unleashes the truth: putin’s war is pure survival, not strategy. Garry Kasparov nails it: putin isn't some rational leader. He's a dictator obsessed with staying in power for 25 years and counting. This war? It's his life support, infecting every part of Russia. Forget ideology, he is a one-man mafia boss, desperate to project strength. He won't stop until he declares 'victory,' which he can't get, so he'll just keep expanding the war. He literally couldn't care less about how many Russians die as long as he controls Moscow and St. Petersburg. Trump even offered him an 'out' twice, and putin rejected it because it would make him look weak - and weakness means the whole flock turns on him. He's even eyeing a test of NATO's Article 5 and hoping his far-right buddies take over Europe. The West's slow reaction and constant reliance on America has just emboldened him. Kasparov is right, the only thing that changes Russia is a Ukrainian victory, and fast. Garry Kasparov: I hate starting to talk with criticism but this time I have to point out that your question basically repeated the same mistake in evaluation because you tried to analyze putin’s actions from the position of the responsible national leader. Everything you said is absolutely correct. vladimir's putin’s rule is devastating for Russia and I believe it will end to the collapse of the Russian Empire which is long overdue. But vladimir putin’s calculations are not based on this rational thinking. His view is very different. He is in power for 25 years and counting. That’s all that matters for him. He’s a dictator and he works for one thing: only survival. He’s still there. And the war has become the only way to keep him in power. War now is in every layer of Russian society, from the very top of the government to industries all the way down to kindergartens. It’s infected by the war virus and that's how putin stays in power. Interviewer: So that makes him different from let's say Soviet leaders or or even some of the tsar’s right? Again you should look at Soviet leaders based on the political momentum, just obviously Soviet leaders that we remember, you and me, so like Brezhnev, they had different calculations. But also don't forget the Soviet leaders after Stalin. They were ruling the country that had strong ideology and communist party. I'm not here to advocate for the communist party or for any kind of ideology but there's a fundamental difference between the party rule which is a mafia structure and the one man dictatorship. putin shifted Russia to a one man dictatorship where everything depends on an individual who is on the top of power, who becomes at certain time a spine of the whole system. And this system depends on his survival, demonstrating his strengths is to be a macho, to be an alpha, surrounded by other mafia bosses. And that's why, you know, his current position today is, you may call it desperate, but I don't think he he sees it the same way. He will continue the war as long as he has the resources. And this is something that the free world is just getting to understand. That was my main criticism to the west. vladimir putin, for a long time was at open war, those were hybrid at the time with the free world. And the free world, and especially Europe, was not willing to hear the messages, to see the messages and to respond accordingly. 1/2
11:29

Garry Kasparov unleashes the truth: putin’s war is pure survival, not strategy. Garry Kasparov nails it: putin isn't some rational leader. He's a dictator obsessed with staying in power for 25 years and counting. This war? It's his life support, infecting every part of Russia. Forget ideology, he is a one-man mafia boss, desperate to project strength. He won't stop until he declares 'victory,' which he can't get, so he'll just keep expanding the war. He literally couldn't care less about how many Russians die as long as he controls Moscow and St. Petersburg. Trump even offered him an 'out' twice, and putin rejected it because it would make him look weak - and weakness means the whole flock turns on him. He's even eyeing a test of NATO's Article 5 and hoping his far-right buddies take over Europe. The West's slow reaction and constant reliance on America has just emboldened him. Kasparov is right, the only thing that changes Russia is a Ukrainian victory, and fast. Garry Kasparov: I hate starting to talk with criticism but this time I have to point out that your question basically repeated the same mistake in evaluation because you tried to analyze putin’s actions from the position of the responsible national leader. Everything you said is absolutely correct. vladimir's putin’s rule is devastating for Russia and I believe it will end to the collapse of the Russian Empire which is long overdue. But vladimir putin’s calculations are not based on this rational thinking. His view is very different. He is in power for 25 years and counting. That’s all that matters for him. He’s a dictator and he works for one thing: only survival. He’s still there. And the war has become the only way to keep him in power. War now is in every layer of Russian society, from the very top of the government to industries all the way down to kindergartens. It’s infected by the war virus and that's how putin stays in power. Interviewer: So that makes him different from let's say Soviet leaders or or even some of the tsar’s right? Again you should look at Soviet leaders based on the political momentum, just obviously Soviet leaders that we remember, you and me, so like Brezhnev, they had different calculations. But also don't forget the Soviet leaders after Stalin. They were ruling the country that had strong ideology and communist party. I'm not here to advocate for the communist party or for any kind of ideology but there's a fundamental difference between the party rule which is a mafia structure and the one man dictatorship. putin shifted Russia to a one man dictatorship where everything depends on an individual who is on the top of power, who becomes at certain time a spine of the whole system. And this system depends on his survival, demonstrating his strengths is to be a macho, to be an alpha, surrounded by other mafia bosses. And that's why, you know, his current position today is, you may call it desperate, but I don't think he he sees it the same way. He will continue the war as long as he has the resources. And this is something that the free world is just getting to understand. That was my main criticism to the west. vladimir putin, for a long time was at open war, those were hybrid at the time with the free world. And the free world, and especially Europe, was not willing to hear the messages, to see the messages and to respond accordingly. 1/2

Yasmina

301,095 次观看 • 8 个月前