Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Few Canadians are paying attention as Senate committee approves creating government power mandating that virtually any site - social media, AI, search - require age verification under threat of court-ordered blocking in Canada. Bill S-209 about far more than pornography sites.

Michael Geist

81,654 subscribers

59,708 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Bill C-34: The REAL REASON Canada Wants To “PROTECT KIDS” ONLINE!! Canada is pushing Bill C-34, the so-called “Safe Social Media Act” forcing age verification using your ID or your face to access social media. They claim it’s about protecting kids… but we’ve seen this playbook before. In this video Dan Dicks of Press For Truth breaks down how this is nothing more than a massive digital ID grab disguised as child protection. From Marc Carney’s post and community notes exposing the truth, to the RCMP labeling “traditional values” as extremism, this bill is a direct threat to privacy and freedom. Last year Dan warned you about Australia’s under-16 social media ban. Now Canada is following the exact same path. If your kids are rotting their brains on social media, the problem isn’t the apps, it’s the adults who gave up on parenting. This is the beginning of Digital ID control. Don’t let them normalize it. Watch until the end and share this video if you value freedom over government surveillance.

Bill C-34: The REAL REASON Canada Wants To “PROTECT KIDS” ONLINE!! Canada is pushing Bill C-34, the so-called “Safe Social Media Act” forcing age verification using your ID or your face to access social media. They claim it’s about protecting kids… but we’ve seen this playbook before. In this video Dan Dicks of Press For Truth breaks down how this is nothing more than a massive digital ID grab disguised as child protection. From Marc Carney’s post and community notes exposing the truth, to the RCMP labeling “traditional values” as extremism, this bill is a direct threat to privacy and freedom. Last year Dan warned you about Australia’s under-16 social media ban. Now Canada is following the exact same path. If your kids are rotting their brains on social media, the problem isn’t the apps, it’s the adults who gave up on parenting. This is the beginning of Digital ID control. Don’t let them normalize it. Watch until the end and share this video if you value freedom over government surveillance.

Dan Dicks

10,718 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

As online harms intensify, children are particularly at risk. To better protect them, our government has introduced the Safe Social Media Act, which will make social media services and AI chatbot services safer for children. The bill, if passed, would require social media services and AI chatbot services to identify, mitigate, and address risks of harm on their platforms, and to develop services that are safe by design and put the safety of children first. It would also prevent Canadians under 16 from having accounts on social media services, while providing a process for social media platforms to seek an exemption if they can demonstrate that they have put in place a sufficient set of protections for children. This law is about holding platforms accountable and ensuring they have protections in place to keep children safe online, reduce harm before it happens, and ensure that digital spaces are safe by design all while protecting the privacy of Canadians.

As online harms intensify, children are particularly at risk. To better protect them, our government has introduced the Safe Social Media Act, which will make social media services and AI chatbot services safer for children. The bill, if passed, would require social media services and AI chatbot services to identify, mitigate, and address risks of harm on their platforms, and to develop services that are safe by design and put the safety of children first. It would also prevent Canadians under 16 from having accounts on social media services, while providing a process for social media platforms to seek an exemption if they can demonstrate that they have put in place a sufficient set of protections for children. This law is about holding platforms accountable and ensuring they have protections in place to keep children safe online, reduce harm before it happens, and ensure that digital spaces are safe by design all while protecting the privacy of Canadians.

Yvan Baker, MP 🇨🇦🇺🇦

18,083 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Bill C-34: The End Of Anonymous Internet In Canada – What You NEED TO KNOW!! Last month the Carney Liberals tabled Bill C-34, marketed as the “Safe Social Media Act.” In reality, this bill is a full-scale assault on anonymity and digital freedom. Under the banner of “protecting children,” the government wants to raise the minimum social media age to 16 and force every single user, including adults, to verify their age through government ID uploads, facial scans, AI age estimation, or whatever method their new Digital Safety Commission approves. That means the end of anonymous browsing, private thoughts online, and unmonitored speech. Every Canadian will be tracked, traced, and databased all while the government “promises” to delete your data later. In this video Dan Dicks of Press For Truth breaks down exactly what Bill C-34 does, how it revives the worst elements of the failed Online Harms Act, the vague “hatred” and “incitement” rules that will lead to mass over-censorship, and most importantly what YOU can do about it now before it’s too late! Please share this video far and wide!!

Bill C-34: The End Of Anonymous Internet In Canada – What You NEED TO KNOW!! Last month the Carney Liberals tabled Bill C-34, marketed as the “Safe Social Media Act.” In reality, this bill is a full-scale assault on anonymity and digital freedom. Under the banner of “protecting children,” the government wants to raise the minimum social media age to 16 and force every single user, including adults, to verify their age through government ID uploads, facial scans, AI age estimation, or whatever method their new Digital Safety Commission approves. That means the end of anonymous browsing, private thoughts online, and unmonitored speech. Every Canadian will be tracked, traced, and databased all while the government “promises” to delete your data later. In this video Dan Dicks of Press For Truth breaks down exactly what Bill C-34 does, how it revives the worst elements of the failed Online Harms Act, the vague “hatred” and “incitement” rules that will lead to mass over-censorship, and most importantly what YOU can do about it now before it’s too late! Please share this video far and wide!!

Dan Dicks

25,724 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

This is the third and final session on the Online Safety Amendment (Social Media Minimum Age) Bill 2024 — aka U16's Social Media Ban - an important piece of legislation being waved through by the Liberal and Labor parties with minimal debate. The Department was called to explain the bill, which of course they defended with responses that would not hold up under closer scrutiny. If only Senators had time to do this. Several serious revelations emerged during the Department’s testimony, including this little pearl: it's better for foreign-owned multinational tech platforms to control children’s internet use than for parents to supervise or manage their children’s social media and online interactions. One Nation strongly disagrees. I also raised concerns about the YouTube exemption, which is worded in such a way that it could apply to any video streaming site, including pornographic sites. The Department’s response was to point to other regulations and codes that "supposedly" protect children from accessing porn. What utter rubbish! Any child in this country without a parental lock can access Pornhub by simply clicking the "Are you over 18?" box. Teachers nationwide report that even primary school students are being exposed to and influenced by pornography. If this bill accomplishes anything good, it should be to prevent children from accessing pornography, which it deliberately avoids doing. This bill is about many things - keeping children safe is not one of them. One Nation will NEVER support this bill because: (1) it should be the responsibility of parents; (2) freedom of speech is every Australian's right; (3) every social media user will need to verify their age by Digital ID.

This is the third and final session on the Online Safety Amendment (Social Media Minimum Age) Bill 2024 — aka U16's Social Media Ban - an important piece of legislation being waved through by the Liberal and Labor parties with minimal debate. The Department was called to explain the bill, which of course they defended with responses that would not hold up under closer scrutiny. If only Senators had time to do this. Several serious revelations emerged during the Department’s testimony, including this little pearl: it's better for foreign-owned multinational tech platforms to control children’s internet use than for parents to supervise or manage their children’s social media and online interactions. One Nation strongly disagrees. I also raised concerns about the YouTube exemption, which is worded in such a way that it could apply to any video streaming site, including pornographic sites. The Department’s response was to point to other regulations and codes that "supposedly" protect children from accessing porn. What utter rubbish! Any child in this country without a parental lock can access Pornhub by simply clicking the "Are you over 18?" box. Teachers nationwide report that even primary school students are being exposed to and influenced by pornography. If this bill accomplishes anything good, it should be to prevent children from accessing pornography, which it deliberately avoids doing. This bill is about many things - keeping children safe is not one of them. One Nation will NEVER support this bill because: (1) it should be the responsibility of parents; (2) freedom of speech is every Australian's right; (3) every social media user will need to verify their age by Digital ID.

Malcolm Roberts 🇦🇺

54,552 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🎥 Eyad Amawi of the Gaza Relief Committee told Drop Site that Palestinians in Gaza are walking more than five kilometers searching for drinking water, as Israel continues to deliberately deprive Palestinians of minimum required levels of food, medicine, and shelter aid, amid daily bombardment, forced evacuations, and mass displacement. Amawi said more than 2,900 children remain missing under the rubble, with Israel still blocking the cranes and heavy machinery needed to recover bodies and search collapsed buildings. “There is no ceasefire here in Gaza,” Amawi says from Deir al-Balah. jeremy scahill | Sharif Kouddous شريف عبد القدوس

🎥 Eyad Amawi of the Gaza Relief Committee told Drop Site that Palestinians in Gaza are walking more than five kilometers searching for drinking water, as Israel continues to deliberately deprive Palestinians of minimum required levels of food, medicine, and shelter aid, amid daily bombardment, forced evacuations, and mass displacement. Amawi said more than 2,900 children remain missing under the rubble, with Israel still blocking the cranes and heavy machinery needed to recover bodies and search collapsed buildings. “There is no ceasefire here in Gaza,” Amawi says from Deir al-Balah. jeremy scahill | Sharif Kouddous شريف عبد القدوس

Drop Site

12,769 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

"Nothing is more scary than KHILAFAH." This is Canada under Justin Trudeau. The Islamists are openly advocating for Khilafah. Khilafah means establishing Sharia Law and in doing that, destroying Western civilization. Under Khilafah, women must cover their faces and they cannot leave the home without the permission of their ‘guardian.’ Under Khilafah, men can have multiple wives and there is no age limit for children to marry. Under Khilafah, you will be lashed over drinking a beer. Under Khilafah, LGBTQ+ are thrown from rooftops. Under Khilafah, there would be no free speech. Want to know what Khilafah truly means? Look at ISIS, al-Qaeda and the Taliban. The Islamists are bringing Khilafah to Canada. No one in Canadian government cares and any criticism is labled as ‘Islamophobia.’ What is happening in the UK (arresting people over memes, gang rapes to innocent girls, Sharia neighbourhoods, no go zones for dogs) is coming to Canada sooner than we thought. I am saying this as a Muslim who took refuge in Canada. Even in my nightmares, I never dreamed that one day I would warn Canadians over the danger of KHILAFAH. Wake up Canada!

"Nothing is more scary than KHILAFAH." This is Canada under Justin Trudeau. The Islamists are openly advocating for Khilafah. Khilafah means establishing Sharia Law and in doing that, destroying Western civilization. Under Khilafah, women must cover their faces and they cannot leave the home without the permission of their ‘guardian.’ Under Khilafah, men can have multiple wives and there is no age limit for children to marry. Under Khilafah, you will be lashed over drinking a beer. Under Khilafah, LGBTQ+ are thrown from rooftops. Under Khilafah, there would be no free speech. Want to know what Khilafah truly means? Look at ISIS, al-Qaeda and the Taliban. The Islamists are bringing Khilafah to Canada. No one in Canadian government cares and any criticism is labled as ‘Islamophobia.’ What is happening in the UK (arresting people over memes, gang rapes to innocent girls, Sharia neighbourhoods, no go zones for dogs) is coming to Canada sooner than we thought. I am saying this as a Muslim who took refuge in Canada. Even in my nightmares, I never dreamed that one day I would warn Canadians over the danger of KHILAFAH. Wake up Canada!

Salman Sima

188,717 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Demonstrations led by young people in Nepal who were angry about the government's blocking of several social media sites grew increasingly violent as protesters set government buildings and politicians’ homes on fire. Some attacked leaders and police opened fire on the crowds, killing 19 people. The prime minister resigned amid widening criticism of the country’s political elite. The social media ban was lifted Tuesday, but the protests continued fueled by rage over the deaths and accusations of political corruption in the nation, where most youth struggle to find work. The government estimates that more than 2,000 young people leave the country every day to seek work in the Middle East or southeast Asia.

Demonstrations led by young people in Nepal who were angry about the government's blocking of several social media sites grew increasingly violent as protesters set government buildings and politicians’ homes on fire. Some attacked leaders and police opened fire on the crowds, killing 19 people. The prime minister resigned amid widening criticism of the country’s political elite. The social media ban was lifted Tuesday, but the protests continued fueled by rage over the deaths and accusations of political corruption in the nation, where most youth struggle to find work. The government estimates that more than 2,000 young people leave the country every day to seek work in the Middle East or southeast Asia.

CBS News

28,148 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Rep. Randy Fine has introduced the No Antisemitism in Education Act, a bill that would strip schools of their funding if they engage in criticism of Israel that the government deems unacceptable. The bill lists several examples of what it considers antisemitic, including: • Making dehumanizing or stereotypical claims about “Jewish power.” • Accusing Israel or Jewish people of staging false flags—classified in the bill as “imagined wrongdoing.” • Suggesting Jews are more loyal to Israel than the United States. • Any form of Holocaust denial or mockery. • Using offensive symbols to ridicule Israel. • Rejecting Israel’s right to exist.

Rep. Randy Fine has introduced the No Antisemitism in Education Act, a bill that would strip schools of their funding if they engage in criticism of Israel that the government deems unacceptable. The bill lists several examples of what it considers antisemitic, including: • Making dehumanizing or stereotypical claims about “Jewish power.” • Accusing Israel or Jewish people of staging false flags—classified in the bill as “imagined wrongdoing.” • Suggesting Jews are more loyal to Israel than the United States. • Any form of Holocaust denial or mockery. • Using offensive symbols to ridicule Israel. • Rejecting Israel’s right to exist.

Shadow of Ezra

1,403,151 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

🌏🛬🇨🇦🏥 : Canadian healthcare is so bad that our Immigration minister just announced stunning new measures to rush doctors into Canada. This includes a rapid process of only 14 days for a foreign doctor to get a work permit, inside Canada. The Federal government is also creating a new 5,000 person immigration pool for international doctors to come to Canada. This is on top of a newly announced express entry for foreign doctors who have already worked at least one year inside Canada. Over the last 10 years the Liberal government packed in millions of immigrants, temporary foreign workers, refugees, asylum seekers & international students. This unsustainable migration policy was done in a bid to create new Liberal voters, as the Liberal brand plummeted in domestic support since 2019. You will note the Liberals have not announced any plan to halt immigration to Canada, until our healthcare system can stabilize. I fear Canadians will be in for a very rude awakening as foreign doctors, who may have some very unethical motives, take over many healthcare departments. This is more proof that the Liberal party cared more about holding onto power, at any cost, than the lives of Canadians that would be lost, as our healthcare system collapsed.

Bruce McGonigal

376,910 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

They are building a digital cage, and they are doing it through a web of multiple bills designed to strip away your remaining anonymity. Look at the full picture: 🚨Bill C-34 (the safe social media act): Branded as a kids ban for under 16. But to lock kids out, they have to lock adults in. Main steam platforms will be forced to implement facial age, estimation and digital ID gates for everyone just to verify that you are an adult. 🚨Bill S-210: branded as a crackdown on adult websites, but the legal text is so broad. It catches search engines like Google and open platforms like X and Reddit. It forces facial recognition checkpoints onto the sites you use daily, backed by $500,000 corporate fines. 🚨Bill C-36: the brand new bill that just dropped, creating a massive federal, digital safety commission. This new digital, super regulator strips, power away from the independent privacy, commissioner, centralizing, total enforcement and private data oversight under a single government appointed panel. 🚨Bill C-63: the massive framework creating a new, government appointed digital safety commission. It weaponizes human rights tribunal to police online speech and introduces heavy-handed hate speech regulations that civil liberty groups warn threaten your right to dissent. 🚨Bill C-9: the criminal follow up that expands the definition of hate and increases penalties under the criminal code, building the legal teeth to enforce what the new digital regulators deem. Unacceptable speech online. 🚨Bill C-22: the ultimate surveillance trap. It forces, Internet providers, VPN’s, and tech platforms to build back and back doors for law-enforcement, mandating that companies, track and store the personal meta-data of all Canadians for up to a year without you ever been suspected of a crime. They didn’t pass one massive digital ID law because they knew that you would fight it. They broke it into pieces. They wrapped it in child safety. They are forcing the private sector to build the walls. No more casual scrolling. No more anonymity. Every tap, account, and view tied directly to your legal name. God Speed.

Unfiltered With Kels

12,170 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🇺🇸🤖🇨🇦🤐 : Mark Carney is asked how the USA fits into Carney’s New World Order agenda. Carney says the USA can help with Ai safety. Mark then says Canada is focused on child safety. Canada allows children to use taxpayer funded hard drugs behind parents backs. Children are provided taxpayer funded snorting kits, needles & naloxone in schools & in youth only clinics. Taxpayers also pay for guides encouraging children to use hard drugs with their friends. Under such WOKE leadership, child overdose went from obscure, to the #1 cause of death of children in BC. With virtually no punishment for those peddling hard drugs to kids. Canada also encourages children to explore gender identity at any age. Despite the government knowing this can cause all kinds of psychological issues. If parents don’t play along, the government takes the children away from the parent(s) and puts the children in foster care. But Mark Carney believes all of that is nothing compared to protecting children from social media, until they're 17. Of course in order to protect children from social media, the government will have to make us all prove our identity online, so the government can track everything we do. Are Liberals so mentally broken, they actually think this will protect children?

🇺🇸🤖🇨🇦🤐 : Mark Carney is asked how the USA fits into Carney’s New World Order agenda. Carney says the USA can help with Ai safety. Mark then says Canada is focused on child safety. Canada allows children to use taxpayer funded hard drugs behind parents backs. Children are provided taxpayer funded snorting kits, needles & naloxone in schools & in youth only clinics. Taxpayers also pay for guides encouraging children to use hard drugs with their friends. Under such WOKE leadership, child overdose went from obscure, to the #1 cause of death of children in BC. With virtually no punishment for those peddling hard drugs to kids. Canada also encourages children to explore gender identity at any age. Despite the government knowing this can cause all kinds of psychological issues. If parents don’t play along, the government takes the children away from the parent(s) and puts the children in foster care. But Mark Carney believes all of that is nothing compared to protecting children from social media, until they're 17. Of course in order to protect children from social media, the government will have to make us all prove our identity online, so the government can track everything we do. Are Liberals so mentally broken, they actually think this will protect children?

Bruce McGonigal

70,807 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

More Optics, more eyes on Keir Starmer announces a social media ban in the UK for under 16s This is more optics, parents and children are now in the loop This is not just an idea of hay popped up and made by Keir, this was always going to happen. Keir is a character in the pantomine, doing exactly what Joe Biden did in America, snapping people out of the sleepy state by being a calamity Something big is about to drop and we need as many as possible paying attention, something that many would choose to ignore, yet something all MUST know. That is the Rape Gang Inquiry report People also have to understand that a lot of people are about to be exposed and the children do not need to see all of the crimes that many of their loved ones are involved with This is why social media would ruin their lives The UK is full of wrongens that are about to be shown to the world #harrythesoulcoach #keirstarmer #unitedkingdom #socialmediaban #truth

More Optics, more eyes on Keir Starmer announces a social media ban in the UK for under 16s This is more optics, parents and children are now in the loop This is not just an idea of hay popped up and made by Keir, this was always going to happen. Keir is a character in the pantomine, doing exactly what Joe Biden did in America, snapping people out of the sleepy state by being a calamity Something big is about to drop and we need as many as possible paying attention, something that many would choose to ignore, yet something all MUST know. That is the Rape Gang Inquiry report People also have to understand that a lot of people are about to be exposed and the children do not need to see all of the crimes that many of their loved ones are involved with This is why social media would ruin their lives The UK is full of wrongens that are about to be shown to the world #harrythesoulcoach #keirstarmer #unitedkingdom #socialmediaban #truth

Harry The Soul Coach

17,633 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

The vault has opened! In 2020, I started noticing some of my favorite Kelly videos were disappearing from the internet, or at least becoming much harder to find. Growing up as a Kelly fan who was terminally online, I remember browsing iconic fan sites like KC Kellyville, Kelly-Clarkson . net, Kelly Source, and so many more. These fan sites were places to connect with other Kelly fans, see all the latest Kelly-related news and rumors, and find any kind of Kelly media you could imagine. It truly was peak internet, for me at least. Fast forward to today, and the internet has largely traded these fan sites for social media. There are pros and cons to that, of course, but I think there is still value in creating spaces online like this. As search engines like Google make it increasingly harder to find that specific thing you’re looking for, and as social media becomes an ever-changing pit of data that’s equally as hard to sift through, The KC Vault feels even more necessary than it did when I first started uploading YouTube videos during the pandemic. With that, I’m excited to be re-launching the site featuring not only our video archives, but a new photo gallery as well. This will of course continue to grow as Kelly continues working and as I continue uncovering Kelly-related media to preserve. I’ve also added a blog to the site to easily keep up with all the latest Kelly news. This is just the beginning, and I’m excited about other features for this site that I’m hoping to share with you in the future. The KC Vault is my love letter to the previously mentioned Kelly fan sites I grew up loving, and I hope it is a great resource for all the Kelly fans for many years to come.

The vault has opened! In 2020, I started noticing some of my favorite Kelly videos were disappearing from the internet, or at least becoming much harder to find. Growing up as a Kelly fan who was terminally online, I remember browsing iconic fan sites like KC Kellyville, Kelly-Clarkson . net, Kelly Source, and so many more. These fan sites were places to connect with other Kelly fans, see all the latest Kelly-related news and rumors, and find any kind of Kelly media you could imagine. It truly was peak internet, for me at least. Fast forward to today, and the internet has largely traded these fan sites for social media. There are pros and cons to that, of course, but I think there is still value in creating spaces online like this. As search engines like Google make it increasingly harder to find that specific thing you’re looking for, and as social media becomes an ever-changing pit of data that’s equally as hard to sift through, The KC Vault feels even more necessary than it did when I first started uploading YouTube videos during the pandemic. With that, I’m excited to be re-launching the site featuring not only our video archives, but a new photo gallery as well. This will of course continue to grow as Kelly continues working and as I continue uncovering Kelly-related media to preserve. I’ve also added a blog to the site to easily keep up with all the latest Kelly news. This is just the beginning, and I’m excited about other features for this site that I’m hoping to share with you in the future. The KC Vault is my love letter to the previously mentioned Kelly fan sites I grew up loving, and I hope it is a great resource for all the Kelly fans for many years to come.

The KC Vault

11,895 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Canada liberal government has 3 bills that when passed will be their most destructive bills ever put into law Free speech will be ended, Canadians will be thrown in prison for social media posts, warrantless searches of phones, pre-crime punishments and even open your mail Bill C-2 - empowers government employees, not police, to open your mail, search your phone or computer — all without a warrant. Bill C-8 - gives cabinet ministers the power to kick Canadians off the internet, impose fines, and demand data — no judge, no police review. Bill C-9 - removes legal safeguards around free speech. Justice Centre expands “hate” prosecutions. Online Harms Act - brings pre-crime punishment: house arrest, ankle bracelets, curfews for people who haven’t committed a crime. Because they might. “If the Online Harms Act is brought back and passed into law, you're gonna see the Canadian Human Rights Commission with massive new powers to prosecute Canadians over offensive non-criminal speech with penalties up to $50,000” (This is a bill that insiders say is about to be revived and passed with the 3 above) “Canada will be a police state by Christmas if Parliament passes bills C2, C8, and C9 in their current form. C2 is the Strong Borders Act. It should be called the Strong Surveillance Act. It empowers Canada Post to open letter mail without a warrant. It criminalizes the use of cash in amounts greater than $10,000. And it empowers a vast army of government officials, not just police, to conduct warrantless searches of the computers and cell phones of Canadians. It is a massive invasion of privacy. It's extremely dangerous.” “You're gonna see a Digital Safety Commission with a vast army of bureaucrats to enforce federal regulations that are passed in respective of the internet and internet contents. And you're gonna see Canadians punished preemptively because their neighbor fears that they might commit a hate speech crime in future, the Online Harms Act would authorize judges to place Canadians under house arrest, wearing an ankle bracelet and respect a curfew, et cetera. Giving the federal government, giving federal cabinet ministers power to kick Canadians off the internet is not necessary for protecting public safety or defending our national security.”

Canada liberal government has 3 bills that when passed will be their most destructive bills ever put into law Free speech will be ended, Canadians will be thrown in prison for social media posts, warrantless searches of phones, pre-crime punishments and even open your mail Bill C-2 - empowers government employees, not police, to open your mail, search your phone or computer — all without a warrant. Bill C-8 - gives cabinet ministers the power to kick Canadians off the internet, impose fines, and demand data — no judge, no police review. Bill C-9 - removes legal safeguards around free speech. Justice Centre expands “hate” prosecutions. Online Harms Act - brings pre-crime punishment: house arrest, ankle bracelets, curfews for people who haven’t committed a crime. Because they might. “If the Online Harms Act is brought back and passed into law, you're gonna see the Canadian Human Rights Commission with massive new powers to prosecute Canadians over offensive non-criminal speech with penalties up to $50,000” (This is a bill that insiders say is about to be revived and passed with the 3 above) “Canada will be a police state by Christmas if Parliament passes bills C2, C8, and C9 in their current form. C2 is the Strong Borders Act. It should be called the Strong Surveillance Act. It empowers Canada Post to open letter mail without a warrant. It criminalizes the use of cash in amounts greater than $10,000. And it empowers a vast army of government officials, not just police, to conduct warrantless searches of the computers and cell phones of Canadians. It is a massive invasion of privacy. It's extremely dangerous.” “You're gonna see a Digital Safety Commission with a vast army of bureaucrats to enforce federal regulations that are passed in respective of the internet and internet contents. And you're gonna see Canadians punished preemptively because their neighbor fears that they might commit a hate speech crime in future, the Online Harms Act would authorize judges to place Canadians under house arrest, wearing an ankle bracelet and respect a curfew, et cetera. Giving the federal government, giving federal cabinet ministers power to kick Canadians off the internet is not necessary for protecting public safety or defending our national security.”

Wall Street Apes

172,665 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

🇨🇦👁‍🗨📱💻 : The RCMP have no idea how many Canadians will be under government surveillance, once Bill C-22 passes. In the name of safety, people are being asked to surrender privacy. We are watching the chaos in Ireland over what their WEF government did. It's also what the Canadian WEF government is doing. The WEF is turning once safe communities into war zones, by importing violent criminals, who get special treatment, under the law. Then the WEF uses the extreme violence and chaos as the excuse to weaponize taxpayer resources and funds, against the general population. Our government is willing to spend massive resources to spy on as many Canadians as it can, without people being informed about how that data is being weaponized against them. My guess is, eventually the government will spy on everyone in Canada and store the data for time eternal, in data centers. The fact is, the Canadian government imported huge international criminal organizations to make Canada unsafe. Gangs that openly taunt & threaten police. It was all done to push through draconian Bills, like C-22. We see how this surveillance state plays out in China. No one should want Canada to follow down the path China paved with "social credit".

🇨🇦👁‍🗨📱💻 : The RCMP have no idea how many Canadians will be under government surveillance, once Bill C-22 passes. In the name of safety, people are being asked to surrender privacy. We are watching the chaos in Ireland over what their WEF government did. It's also what the Canadian WEF government is doing. The WEF is turning once safe communities into war zones, by importing violent criminals, who get special treatment, under the law. Then the WEF uses the extreme violence and chaos as the excuse to weaponize taxpayer resources and funds, against the general population. Our government is willing to spend massive resources to spy on as many Canadians as it can, without people being informed about how that data is being weaponized against them. My guess is, eventually the government will spy on everyone in Canada and store the data for time eternal, in data centers. The fact is, the Canadian government imported huge international criminal organizations to make Canada unsafe. Gangs that openly taunt & threaten police. It was all done to push through draconian Bills, like C-22. We see how this surveillance state plays out in China. No one should want Canada to follow down the path China paved with "social credit".

Bruce McGonigal

18,367 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🚨BREAKING🚨 Alford vs. Canada has just been granted leave for appeal at the Supreme Court of Canada. Why is this case important to ALL Canadians? There are individuals currently in Parliament who have committed treason yet their identities remain hidden under the pretext of national security. And if any Member of Parliament dares to speak out, they could face up to 14 years in prison – even if the matter is undeniably in the public interest. A victory in Alford v Canada would affirm that no member of parliament is above the law for actions that threaten our democratic institutions. So, how did we end up here? Well, it all started in 2017 with the creation of the National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians Act (NSICOP). Section 12 of the act in particular, has been instrumental in silencing voices and shutting down open discussion - all under the guise of confidentiality. In Alford v. Canada the stakes have never been higher in protecting parliamentary privilege and the fundamental right of MPs and Senators to freely debate and disclose vital information without fear of retaliation. Ryan Alford’s case is about restoring the balance of power. It’s about ensuring Parliament—not the executive branch—remains the ultimate check on government decisions, especially when secrecy is used to evade accountability. The government must always act within constitutional boundaries. Period. Ryan Alford’s fight is not just a legal battle—it’s a defense of democracy. The future of accountability is on the line. Please stay tuned for updates on Alford vs. Canada. I’ll be posting the hearing date to social media as soon as it becomes available. Public awareness is our greatest weapon, which is why this video is necessary. Freedom dies in the dark. From the @DaveFreedom6 video Alford vs Canada...

🚨BREAKING🚨 Alford vs. Canada has just been granted leave for appeal at the Supreme Court of Canada. Why is this case important to ALL Canadians? There are individuals currently in Parliament who have committed treason yet their identities remain hidden under the pretext of national security. And if any Member of Parliament dares to speak out, they could face up to 14 years in prison – even if the matter is undeniably in the public interest. A victory in Alford v Canada would affirm that no member of parliament is above the law for actions that threaten our democratic institutions. So, how did we end up here? Well, it all started in 2017 with the creation of the National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians Act (NSICOP). Section 12 of the act in particular, has been instrumental in silencing voices and shutting down open discussion - all under the guise of confidentiality. In Alford v. Canada the stakes have never been higher in protecting parliamentary privilege and the fundamental right of MPs and Senators to freely debate and disclose vital information without fear of retaliation. Ryan Alford’s case is about restoring the balance of power. It’s about ensuring Parliament—not the executive branch—remains the ultimate check on government decisions, especially when secrecy is used to evade accountability. The government must always act within constitutional boundaries. Period. Ryan Alford’s fight is not just a legal battle—it’s a defense of democracy. The future of accountability is on the line. Please stay tuned for updates on Alford vs. Canada. I’ll be posting the hearing date to social media as soon as it becomes available. Public awareness is our greatest weapon, which is why this video is necessary. Freedom dies in the dark. From the @DaveFreedom6 video Alford vs Canada...

DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY

84,740 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Social media ban or big brother control? The government, with support of the Liberals, is proposing a ban on children under 16 accessing social media, justifying the measure by claiming it’s "popular." Oh, really? It’s ironic that the same parties that accuse One Nation of populism are now pushing a measure not because it’s practical, but simply because it’s supposedly popular. A true conservative party Peter Dutton would support parents to supervise their own children in their own homes. A true conservative, Mr Dutton, would not be promoting big government replacing parents. The eGovernment is also trialling age-assurance technology, which uses facial scans of every social media user to confirm they are over 16. If there’s any doubt, the system will cross-check the person’s Digital ID to ensure it matches. In addition to facial scans, the "Assurance AI" will monitor keystrokes, audio patterns and "other measures" to determine the user’s age. By now you may conclude, as I did, that enforcing a social media age limit of 16 would require verifying everyone’s age using the device camera and their Digital ID—which everyone would be forced to have. So much for Digital ID being voluntary. Even adults will need one to continue using social media. Even more alarming is the fact that conversations would be monitored for signs of age, yet what happens to the voice prints and keystroke logs this system collects? To make this work, cameras on devices would need to run constantly to ensure a new user hasn’t hopped on to an existing computer session. This means cameras would always be on, capturing everything - video and audio – that is happening in the room. This creates a perfect scenario for hackers to access the feed. In the unlikely event they can actually make this work, children would move to other platforms that are less regulated, less safe and more prone to child exploitation. One Nation opposes this legislation. The best people to monitor and regulate children’s internet use are parents—not a Big Brother government.

Social media ban or big brother control? The government, with support of the Liberals, is proposing a ban on children under 16 accessing social media, justifying the measure by claiming it’s "popular." Oh, really? It’s ironic that the same parties that accuse One Nation of populism are now pushing a measure not because it’s practical, but simply because it’s supposedly popular. A true conservative party Peter Dutton would support parents to supervise their own children in their own homes. A true conservative, Mr Dutton, would not be promoting big government replacing parents. The eGovernment is also trialling age-assurance technology, which uses facial scans of every social media user to confirm they are over 16. If there’s any doubt, the system will cross-check the person’s Digital ID to ensure it matches. In addition to facial scans, the "Assurance AI" will monitor keystrokes, audio patterns and "other measures" to determine the user’s age. By now you may conclude, as I did, that enforcing a social media age limit of 16 would require verifying everyone’s age using the device camera and their Digital ID—which everyone would be forced to have. So much for Digital ID being voluntary. Even adults will need one to continue using social media. Even more alarming is the fact that conversations would be monitored for signs of age, yet what happens to the voice prints and keystroke logs this system collects? To make this work, cameras on devices would need to run constantly to ensure a new user hasn’t hopped on to an existing computer session. This means cameras would always be on, capturing everything - video and audio – that is happening in the room. This creates a perfect scenario for hackers to access the feed. In the unlikely event they can actually make this work, children would move to other platforms that are less regulated, less safe and more prone to child exploitation. One Nation opposes this legislation. The best people to monitor and regulate children’s internet use are parents—not a Big Brother government.

Malcolm Roberts 🇦🇺

65,540 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

In a few weeks, the Senate will vote on the ASIO Amendment Bill (No. 2)—and every Australian who values freedom under the law should be paying attention. This Bill doesn’t just extend extraordinary powers—it makes them permanent. Powers that were meant to expire by March 2027 would instead become ongoing. It expands compulsory questioning for adults and even minors, weakens safeguards, limits access to legal counsel, and lacks proper judicial oversight. These are not ordinary powers. They allow the state to compel answers under threat of penalty. That is a serious intrusion into personal liberty. Of course, national security matters—but it must never come at the unchecked expense of freedom. For these reasons, I will NOT be supporting this Bill. To hear more from me and stay up to date, signup to my email newsletter here:

In a few weeks, the Senate will vote on the ASIO Amendment Bill (No. 2)—and every Australian who values freedom under the law should be paying attention. This Bill doesn’t just extend extraordinary powers—it makes them permanent. Powers that were meant to expire by March 2027 would instead become ongoing. It expands compulsory questioning for adults and even minors, weakens safeguards, limits access to legal counsel, and lacks proper judicial oversight. These are not ordinary powers. They allow the state to compel answers under threat of penalty. That is a serious intrusion into personal liberty. Of course, national security matters—but it must never come at the unchecked expense of freedom. For these reasons, I will NOT be supporting this Bill. To hear more from me and stay up to date, signup to my email newsletter here:

Senator Alex Antic

108,574 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten