Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

FLASHBACK (5/1/23): Complementarian girlboss Allie Beth Stuckey (Allie Beth Stuckey) attacked the patriarchy after being told that she ought not be teaching in the public square. Allie first briefly described the patriarchal view, then quoted Joel Webbon (Right Response Ministries) without attribution, who said in a sermon that he... would not allow his wife to read certain books before he could screen them first (based). A few things to note here. Listen to the disdain in her voice as she finished quoting Webbon. It’s palpable. Also, right after reading the quote, she literally describes herself and her audience as STRONG and INDEPENDENT! I don’t think she can even hear herself. Brothers, you need to be aware that these female Christian influencers are very much given over to feminist tendencies. They may say and believe a lot of the right things, but that’s honestly not enough. Eventually, the feminist inside will come out, and you don’t want that influence on your wives and daughters. Werry’s Law is real, and it’s spectacular. Link:show more

Defiant Baptist

16,866 subscribers

73,126 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

I have quite a few clips from Allie Beth Stuckey’s response episode. If there is continued interest, I’ll keep sharing them, but I really don’t want to beat a dead horse. Still, there are a lot of interesting things that she says, if you listen closely. First, Allie attempted to respond to the allegations that her TPUSA speech was a feminist nagging session. I say attempted, because she basically said that her definitions of “feminism” and “nagging” are different from that of her detractors. Allie can’t be a feminist, because she was just a woman standing on a stage saying true things and sharing her concerns. And it couldn’t be nagging because she got a very enthusiastic response from the crowd, the same one that paid to come see her speak. Briefly, Stuckey was acting like a feminist because she was on a stage in a teaching capacity. She was nagging because she was telling men everywhere what they had to do in order to be real men. That’s it. Very simple. Stay tuned for at least one more clip. 🫡

I have quite a few clips from Allie Beth Stuckey’s response episode. If there is continued interest, I’ll keep sharing them, but I really don’t want to beat a dead horse. Still, there are a lot of interesting things that she says, if you listen closely. First, Allie attempted to respond to the allegations that her TPUSA speech was a feminist nagging session. I say attempted, because she basically said that her definitions of “feminism” and “nagging” are different from that of her detractors. Allie can’t be a feminist, because she was just a woman standing on a stage saying true things and sharing her concerns. And it couldn’t be nagging because she got a very enthusiastic response from the crowd, the same one that paid to come see her speak. Briefly, Stuckey was acting like a feminist because she was on a stage in a teaching capacity. She was nagging because she was telling men everywhere what they had to do in order to be real men. That’s it. Very simple. Stay tuned for at least one more clip. 🫡

Defiant Baptist

16,731 views • 11 months ago

You will never hear a better definition of Complementarianism than this. Allie Beth Stuckey (Allie Beth Stuckey) says that she could be a pastor since she has been gifted that way, but she chooses not to because God said so. The implication is that men and women are interchangeable widgets with all the same gifts, but God has arbitrarily declared that men are to do this, and women are to do that. It was evidently His goal to make women feel perpetually frustrated by giving them gifts that they would never be able to use! 🤯

You will never hear a better definition of Complementarianism than this. Allie Beth Stuckey (Allie Beth Stuckey) says that she could be a pastor since she has been gifted that way, but she chooses not to because God said so. The implication is that men and women are interchangeable widgets with all the same gifts, but God has arbitrarily declared that men are to do this, and women are to do that. It was evidently His goal to make women feel perpetually frustrated by giving them gifts that they would never be able to use! 🤯

Defiant Baptist

378,831 views • 1 year ago

As I predicted, Allie Beth Stuckey (Allie Beth Stuckey) stopped responding to criticism on X about her interview with Brittni De La Mora, and instead decided to reprimand all us behind her Relatapulpit. Allie did not address our substantive concerns with the conversion story. Specifically, Brittni returned to p0rn twice after having dramatic conversion experiences, and she functions as a pastor in her church and ministry. De La Mora also claims to have received direct revelation from God, an idea that Stuckey strongly disagrees with. Instead, Allie recited all of the standard talking points about how Jesus did not avoid this type of woman, that we have disdain for women like Brittni, and ultimately that we just don’t understand the gospel. This is all gaslighting, and it won’t work. It doesn’t matter what Brittni claims she heard from God. She is in rebellion against Him by cosplaying as a pastor, even if she no longer retains the title. In her public-facing role, she is a temptation for men and a terrible role model for women. Brittni needs to be out of the spotlight, and Allie should have told her so.

As I predicted, Allie Beth Stuckey (Allie Beth Stuckey) stopped responding to criticism on X about her interview with Brittni De La Mora, and instead decided to reprimand all us behind her Relatapulpit. Allie did not address our substantive concerns with the conversion story. Specifically, Brittni returned to p0rn twice after having dramatic conversion experiences, and she functions as a pastor in her church and ministry. De La Mora also claims to have received direct revelation from God, an idea that Stuckey strongly disagrees with. Instead, Allie recited all of the standard talking points about how Jesus did not avoid this type of woman, that we have disdain for women like Brittni, and ultimately that we just don’t understand the gospel. This is all gaslighting, and it won’t work. It doesn’t matter what Brittni claims she heard from God. She is in rebellion against Him by cosplaying as a pastor, even if she no longer retains the title. In her public-facing role, she is a temptation for men and a terrible role model for women. Brittni needs to be out of the spotlight, and Allie should have told her so.

Defiant Baptist

69,737 views • 6 months ago

Candace Owens is attacking Allie Beth Stuckey (Allie Beth Stuckey) for being a "mean girl", using her Christianity to justify her behaviour and that she wasn't actually that close to Charlie Kirk - as usual everything is PROJECTION with Candace. Candace also claimed the only reason Stuckey was going after her was because: "you are part Jewish and you are being exceedingly tribal." Stuckey responded, to this absurd attack, saying "my great-grandfather whom I never met was Jewish." So just in case people forgot amongst all the disgusting things Candace Owens has been doing, yes, she still despises Jews.

Candace Owens is attacking Allie Beth Stuckey (Allie Beth Stuckey) for being a "mean girl", using her Christianity to justify her behaviour and that she wasn't actually that close to Charlie Kirk - as usual everything is PROJECTION with Candace. Candace also claimed the only reason Stuckey was going after her was because: "you are part Jewish and you are being exceedingly tribal." Stuckey responded, to this absurd attack, saying "my great-grandfather whom I never met was Jewish." So just in case people forgot amongst all the disgusting things Candace Owens has been doing, yes, she still despises Jews.

Nathan Livingstone (MilkBarTV)

41,717 views • 9 months ago

FLASHBACK: Three years ago, Allie Beth Stuckey went on the (unmarried) Alex Clark podcast to discuss marriage and parenting. The talk about wives submitting to husbands was quite telling. 1) Alex says they have the healthy, biblical version of submission, as opposed to those in the trad movement who have a warped, distorted view of it. 2) Allie mentions criticism she has received that she rejects the traditional view of marriage and family. She actually does reject them, since she’s the breadwinner for her family, works outside the home, and her husband is her employee (agent). 3) Allie counters this by saying that she affirms biblical marriage as well as the exhortations to wives and husbands in Ephesians 5. 4) Allie claims that “submission” is a scary word for women. Gosh, I wonder why that is? Maybe it’s the feminism pushed by people like her. 5) Alex immediately pivots to the husband’s responsibility, that their duty (which is unconditional) is also a lot on their shoulders. Allie affirms this sacrificial love as being counter-cultural in the first century. Neither gal has even attempted to address what submission means for a wife. 6) Finally, Allie explains what submission does NOT mean. It does not imply that husbands should not consult their wives. So there you have it. Wives are to submit to their husbands, but don’t forget what husbands are supposed to do, and don’t forget all the caveats for wives with respect to submission! And all of this is coming from two working women, one of whom isn’t even married. Isn’t complementarianism fun?! 🙃

FLASHBACK: Three years ago, Allie Beth Stuckey went on the (unmarried) Alex Clark podcast to discuss marriage and parenting. The talk about wives submitting to husbands was quite telling. 1) Alex says they have the healthy, biblical version of submission, as opposed to those in the trad movement who have a warped, distorted view of it. 2) Allie mentions criticism she has received that she rejects the traditional view of marriage and family. She actually does reject them, since she’s the breadwinner for her family, works outside the home, and her husband is her employee (agent). 3) Allie counters this by saying that she affirms biblical marriage as well as the exhortations to wives and husbands in Ephesians 5. 4) Allie claims that “submission” is a scary word for women. Gosh, I wonder why that is? Maybe it’s the feminism pushed by people like her. 5) Alex immediately pivots to the husband’s responsibility, that their duty (which is unconditional) is also a lot on their shoulders. Allie affirms this sacrificial love as being counter-cultural in the first century. Neither gal has even attempted to address what submission means for a wife. 6) Finally, Allie explains what submission does NOT mean. It does not imply that husbands should not consult their wives. So there you have it. Wives are to submit to their husbands, but don’t forget what husbands are supposed to do, and don’t forget all the caveats for wives with respect to submission! And all of this is coming from two working women, one of whom isn’t even married. Isn’t complementarianism fun?! 🙃

Defiant Baptist

63,087 views • 2 months ago

FLASHBACK (10/17/2023): Allie Beth Stuckey answered the question, “What is the difference between submitting to your husband and the Patriarchy?” In this clip, she demonstrates why Paul said, “I suffer not a woman to teach.” First of all, let’s think about the question itself. Why was it asked in the first place? I submit to you that it’s because Allie’s audience knows that she is anti-Patriarchy. This has been seen in how she counter-signals patriarchal Christians in the CN movement. The questioner knows this, which is why the question was framed this way. Second, notice how when talking about submission, Allie immediately launches into what it does NOT mean. Wives should submit, but here are all the times when they don’t have to. Submission is never talked about positively, and a positive definition is never provided. My captions demonstrate this. It’s very problematic to make submission conditional, since a reviling wife can easily make up definitions of abuse and sin that get her off the hook regarding submission. Likewise, she will insist that the Patriarchy is not bad. Stuckey says this multiple times and in multiple ways. However, she will never call it good either. Allie knows that she can’t outright decry the Patriarchy because it’s in the Bible, so she gives it lip service instead. Never is there a positive definition, just like with submission. Finally, Allie gets to what’s required of men, even though that’s unrelated to the original question. With gusto, she explains positively and unconditionally what husbands must do for their wives. There are no exceptions. Christ-like love is required, regardless of the wife’s behavior. So the question is, why is a husband’s love unconditional while a wife’s submission is conditional? Some food for thought…

FLASHBACK (10/17/2023): Allie Beth Stuckey answered the question, “What is the difference between submitting to your husband and the Patriarchy?” In this clip, she demonstrates why Paul said, “I suffer not a woman to teach.” First of all, let’s think about the question itself. Why was it asked in the first place? I submit to you that it’s because Allie’s audience knows that she is anti-Patriarchy. This has been seen in how she counter-signals patriarchal Christians in the CN movement. The questioner knows this, which is why the question was framed this way. Second, notice how when talking about submission, Allie immediately launches into what it does NOT mean. Wives should submit, but here are all the times when they don’t have to. Submission is never talked about positively, and a positive definition is never provided. My captions demonstrate this. It’s very problematic to make submission conditional, since a reviling wife can easily make up definitions of abuse and sin that get her off the hook regarding submission. Likewise, she will insist that the Patriarchy is not bad. Stuckey says this multiple times and in multiple ways. However, she will never call it good either. Allie knows that she can’t outright decry the Patriarchy because it’s in the Bible, so she gives it lip service instead. Never is there a positive definition, just like with submission. Finally, Allie gets to what’s required of men, even though that’s unrelated to the original question. With gusto, she explains positively and unconditionally what husbands must do for their wives. There are no exceptions. Christ-like love is required, regardless of the wife’s behavior. So the question is, why is a husband’s love unconditional while a wife’s submission is conditional? Some food for thought…

Defiant Baptist

16,898 views • 6 months ago

So the next Beth Moore, Pastrix Allie Beth Stuckey, decided to step behind the Relatapulpit in the Church of the Longhouse and deliver a sermon on Judeo-Christianity. And what a banger it was. Mostly, she just reads X posts from people on both sides of the debate, starting with Wes Huff, Stephen Wolfe, and Jordan Peterson. It’s very cringe that she sees former youth pastor Mike Winger as authoritative in this debate, but we all know that discernment isn’t her strong suit. It’s also clear that she knows about “The Hyphenated Heresy,” but she refuses to reference it or its authors by name. What I really want you to focus on is the final minute. Here, Allie is emphasizing how necessary it is to understand the Jewish context of Jesus in order to really™️ understand who he is. But even more than that, she calls creation itself a Jewish idea BEFORE CHRISTIANITY, which is a major gaffe for someone that considers herself a teacher. Stuckey doesn’t realize it, but she has adopted a hyper-dispensational perspective by implying that Christianity entered into the world 2000 years ago. Christ created the universe. Christ walked with Adam in the garden. Christ killed the first animal to make a covering for Adam. THE ENTIRE BIBLE IS CHRISTIAN! This should serve as a warning for just how insidious the Judeo-Christian heresy can be. Seriously brothers, do not let your wives and daughters listen to Relatable. No good can come from it!

So the next Beth Moore, Pastrix Allie Beth Stuckey, decided to step behind the Relatapulpit in the Church of the Longhouse and deliver a sermon on Judeo-Christianity. And what a banger it was. Mostly, she just reads X posts from people on both sides of the debate, starting with Wes Huff, Stephen Wolfe, and Jordan Peterson. It’s very cringe that she sees former youth pastor Mike Winger as authoritative in this debate, but we all know that discernment isn’t her strong suit. It’s also clear that she knows about “The Hyphenated Heresy,” but she refuses to reference it or its authors by name. What I really want you to focus on is the final minute. Here, Allie is emphasizing how necessary it is to understand the Jewish context of Jesus in order to really™️ understand who he is. But even more than that, she calls creation itself a Jewish idea BEFORE CHRISTIANITY, which is a major gaffe for someone that considers herself a teacher. Stuckey doesn’t realize it, but she has adopted a hyper-dispensational perspective by implying that Christianity entered into the world 2000 years ago. Christ created the universe. Christ walked with Adam in the garden. Christ killed the first animal to make a covering for Adam. THE ENTIRE BIBLE IS CHRISTIAN! This should serve as a warning for just how insidious the Judeo-Christian heresy can be. Seriously brothers, do not let your wives and daughters listen to Relatable. No good can come from it!

Defiant Baptist

748,272 views • 2 months ago

FLASHBACK (9/9/2019): Allie Beth Stuckey reflects on her time in college, including a lengthy period of drinking and partying. There are quite a few things to note here. First, there is zero mention of academics. For Allie, college was about making friends and possibly finding a husband. In 35 minutes of speaking about this, she never says that she should have focused more on school. Second, she blames her partying phase on a difficult breakup and really doesn’t take any responsibility for the debauchery she was involved in. It sounds very similar to modern women wanting to find themselves after being tied down by a serious relationship. Third, while Stuckey denies sleeping around in high school, there was no such denial regarding her college years. Such an omission is quite suspicious. Finally, Allie adopts the same “God fixes everything for promiscuous women” attitude that has been playing on repeat this week, including from Allie herself. If indeed she had a promiscuous phase in college, that would no doubt inform her perspective on the Ashley Sheatz story. What do you think?

FLASHBACK (9/9/2019): Allie Beth Stuckey reflects on her time in college, including a lengthy period of drinking and partying. There are quite a few things to note here. First, there is zero mention of academics. For Allie, college was about making friends and possibly finding a husband. In 35 minutes of speaking about this, she never says that she should have focused more on school. Second, she blames her partying phase on a difficult breakup and really doesn’t take any responsibility for the debauchery she was involved in. It sounds very similar to modern women wanting to find themselves after being tied down by a serious relationship. Third, while Stuckey denies sleeping around in high school, there was no such denial regarding her college years. Such an omission is quite suspicious. Finally, Allie adopts the same “God fixes everything for promiscuous women” attitude that has been playing on repeat this week, including from Allie herself. If indeed she had a promiscuous phase in college, that would no doubt inform her perspective on the Ashley Sheatz story. What do you think?

Defiant Baptist

259,221 views • 6 months ago

Since Allie Beth Stuckey decided to interview Brittni De La Mora, here is Brittni describing part of her p0rn-to-pastrix conversion story. At this point in the story, she’s flying out to film a sex scene when she has a dramatic encounter with God on the plane. After reading the Bible and hearing audibly from God, she says sorry and please forgive me. Interestingly, she also says she “quit the p0rn industry that day.” But a few moments later, she admits to filming the scene anyway(!), for three reasons: 1) Didn’t want to cancel on her employer. 2) Wanted to be honorable. 3) Wanted to get her last paycheck. Brittni also attempts to sanctify the action, by claiming she evangelized her costars and crew. De La Mora went on to marry a pastor and become a “pastor” herself, which itself is an act of rebellion against God. It’s very difficult to believe this was a genuine conversion, but don’t tell that to Allie. (BTW, I cut out some irrelevant parts of the story where she veered off into other topics.)

Sensitive content

Since Allie Beth Stuckey decided to interview Brittni De La Mora, here is Brittni describing part of her p0rn-to-pastrix conversion story. At this point in the story, she’s flying out to film a sex scene when she has a dramatic encounter with God on the plane. After reading the Bible and hearing audibly from God, she says sorry and please forgive me. Interestingly, she also says she “quit the p0rn industry that day.” But a few moments later, she admits to filming the scene anyway(!), for three reasons: 1) Didn’t want to cancel on her employer. 2) Wanted to be honorable. 3) Wanted to get her last paycheck. Brittni also attempts to sanctify the action, by claiming she evangelized her costars and crew. De La Mora went on to marry a pastor and become a “pastor” herself, which itself is an act of rebellion against God. It’s very difficult to believe this was a genuine conversion, but don’t tell that to Allie. (BTW, I cut out some irrelevant parts of the story where she veered off into other topics.)

Defiant Baptist

85,214 views • 6 months ago

.Allie Beth Stuckey reveals the only downside to Protestants not having a Pope 😂 "I wish that I were the Protestant Pope so I could excommunicate Andy Beshear and all of these people who identify as Evangelicals who claim that loving your neighbor is legally allowing a child to be brutalized because they've been told that they are born in the wrong body."

.Allie Beth Stuckey reveals the only downside to Protestants not having a Pope 😂 "I wish that I were the Protestant Pope so I could excommunicate Andy Beshear and all of these people who identify as Evangelicals who claim that loving your neighbor is legally allowing a child to be brutalized because they've been told that they are born in the wrong body."

Daily Wire

85,886 views • 7 months ago

Lana Rhoades revealed that despite her past in the advlt entertainment industry, she doesn’t consider herself a very s3xual or outgoing person and described herself as naturally reserved. She shared that there was even a time she was in a three-way situation with her friends and that didn’t feel right to her, so she chose to leave because she wasn’t comfortable. “I personally don’t like how reserved I am… it’s not that I want to be like that. I’ve always been like that from the beginning.”

Sensitive content

Lana Rhoades revealed that despite her past in the advlt entertainment industry, she doesn’t consider herself a very s3xual or outgoing person and described herself as naturally reserved. She shared that there was even a time she was in a three-way situation with her friends and that didn’t feel right to her, so she chose to leave because she wasn’t comfortable. “I personally don’t like how reserved I am… it’s not that I want to be like that. I’ve always been like that from the beginning.”

ZAN

172,076 views • 5 months ago

A lady recounted her experience with a guy she described as extremely shameless. According to her, the guy had been texting her persistently and kept insisting on taking her out on a date. She eventually agreed, and he suggested a location close to his place. On the day of the date, she arrived before him. Despite the proximity, he showed up very late. What infuriated her wasn’t the lateness itself, but the fact that he arrived wearing nothing but a Barcelona jersey and a pair of Nike slides. Once they had ordered food, he casually told her that since his place was right nearby, she should just come over with him after they finished eating. She immediately said no. This prompted him to say that he wouldn’t pay for her meal if she refused to follow him home. She quickly replied that in that case she would cover her own food, which she did without hesitation. Even after they finished eating and she booked a Bolt to go home, the guy asked if he could join her in the car and get dropped off at his junction. She agreed but made him pay part of the fare.

Sensitive content

A lady recounted her experience with a guy she described as extremely shameless. According to her, the guy had been texting her persistently and kept insisting on taking her out on a date. She eventually agreed, and he suggested a location close to his place. On the day of the date, she arrived before him. Despite the proximity, he showed up very late. What infuriated her wasn’t the lateness itself, but the fact that he arrived wearing nothing but a Barcelona jersey and a pair of Nike slides. Once they had ordered food, he casually told her that since his place was right nearby, she should just come over with him after they finished eating. She immediately said no. This prompted him to say that he wouldn’t pay for her meal if she refused to follow him home. She quickly replied that in that case she would cover her own food, which she did without hesitation. Even after they finished eating and she booked a Bolt to go home, the guy asked if he could join her in the car and get dropped off at his junction. She agreed but made him pay part of the fare.

𝐀𝐒𝐊

111,299 views • 8 months ago

Mom! Allie Beth’s Bossing Me! So here we all are, in the feminist longhouse, wondering if there is a good way to navigate our way out of this leper colony. The longhouse rules dictate what the docile men are supposed to do, which they willingly do as their civic duty, abjuring their privilege as they go. Of course they do. But the rules are so entrenched that they also affect and drive the behavior of many of those who fancy themselves restive rebels against the matriarchy. But the feminists have done a more thorough job smashing the patriarchy than the click bait bros have done in smashing the longhouse. For example, Allie Beth Stuckey did a thing, and gave a big sister talk to the men. Like most big sisters, she did not anticipate how it would come across, and found that her pungent observations were, um, underappreciated. She even had that big sister tone, which didn’t help. There were howls of protest, many of them from men who found that they would rather talk about Allie Beth getting out of her lane than to even think about the men who have been enervated by porn. That would be to acknowledge that big sister might have had something of a point, and in many of the cases she might have had a point about their own browser histories. But rather than think about their own browser histories, they concluded it would be much more edifying to yell about Allie Beth’s conservative variant of feminism. And so yell they did.

Mom! Allie Beth’s Bossing Me! So here we all are, in the feminist longhouse, wondering if there is a good way to navigate our way out of this leper colony. The longhouse rules dictate what the docile men are supposed to do, which they willingly do as their civic duty, abjuring their privilege as they go. Of course they do. But the rules are so entrenched that they also affect and drive the behavior of many of those who fancy themselves restive rebels against the matriarchy. But the feminists have done a more thorough job smashing the patriarchy than the click bait bros have done in smashing the longhouse. For example, Allie Beth Stuckey did a thing, and gave a big sister talk to the men. Like most big sisters, she did not anticipate how it would come across, and found that her pungent observations were, um, underappreciated. She even had that big sister tone, which didn’t help. There were howls of protest, many of them from men who found that they would rather talk about Allie Beth getting out of her lane than to even think about the men who have been enervated by porn. That would be to acknowledge that big sister might have had something of a point, and in many of the cases she might have had a point about their own browser histories. But rather than think about their own browser histories, they concluded it would be much more edifying to yell about Allie Beth’s conservative variant of feminism. And so yell they did.

Douglas Wilson

161,884 views • 11 months ago

Here’s my final clip from the Brittni De La Mora interview by Allie Beth Stuckey. Am I not merciful? This is the portion where she describes the dramatic plane flight to her final p0rn scene. It’s mostly the same as the clip that I posted yesterday, but there are a few things I want you to notice. First of all, God tells her on the plane that He would bless her if she would just quit this industry today. Well, I’ve got some bad news. She didn’t. So no blessings I guess. Second, I want you to notice how cavalier she is when talking about filming this final scene. She tells the cast and crew, “Yes, but this is the last time.” Uhhh…that’s not repentance. Then she says she regrets doing it and wishes she wouldn’t have. That’s something you say for a mild offense! This lady had sex on camera after claiming God spoke to her, and she has regrets?! Where is the godly sorrow? Where is the accountability? I just don’t see it. Finally, I also want to make a broader point about this “God told me” phenomenon. When someone tells you that, they are putting up a force field against criticism. It’s like, “If you question what I’m saying, you’re questioning God Himself.” That’s really what’s happening, and it’s the way these NAR heretics are able to manipulate so many people. I hope this has been helpful.

Here’s my final clip from the Brittni De La Mora interview by Allie Beth Stuckey. Am I not merciful? This is the portion where she describes the dramatic plane flight to her final p0rn scene. It’s mostly the same as the clip that I posted yesterday, but there are a few things I want you to notice. First of all, God tells her on the plane that He would bless her if she would just quit this industry today. Well, I’ve got some bad news. She didn’t. So no blessings I guess. Second, I want you to notice how cavalier she is when talking about filming this final scene. She tells the cast and crew, “Yes, but this is the last time.” Uhhh…that’s not repentance. Then she says she regrets doing it and wishes she wouldn’t have. That’s something you say for a mild offense! This lady had sex on camera after claiming God spoke to her, and she has regrets?! Where is the godly sorrow? Where is the accountability? I just don’t see it. Finally, I also want to make a broader point about this “God told me” phenomenon. When someone tells you that, they are putting up a force field against criticism. It’s like, “If you question what I’m saying, you’re questioning God Himself.” That’s really what’s happening, and it’s the way these NAR heretics are able to manipulate so many people. I hope this has been helpful.

Defiant Baptist

12,266 views • 6 months ago

ROSALÍA apologises for saying she ‘separates the art from the artist’ in relation to Pablo Picasso. She explains that she was not aware he had abused women and that her knowledge of him being great was based on what she heard from others. She also clarifies she is a feminist as she fears that may not have been clear to others.

ROSALÍA apologises for saying she ‘separates the art from the artist’ in relation to Pablo Picasso. She explains that she was not aware he had abused women and that her knowledge of him being great was based on what she heard from others. She also clarifies she is a feminist as she fears that may not have been clear to others.

Pop Base

5,754,128 views • 6 months ago

Watching Allie Beth Stuckey respond to Candace Owens was a masterclass in what Christian correction should look like. Allie addressed the conspiracy claims with clarity, Scripture, and love. She pointed people to Christ, offered biblical principles for discernment, and handled the situation with grace that many of us (including me) can aspire to. And yet Candace responded by calling her a “fake Christian.” Anyone who has followed Allie’s work knows how unfair and disingenuous that is. Her fruits speak for themselves. She is thoughtful, rooted in Scripture, and consistently reflects the character of Christ in how she communicates. What confuses me is this double standard: Candace can flippantly accuse others, imply dark motives, and stir fear without evidence… but the moment someone pushes back with facts, Scripture, and clarity, suddenly they are the problem. You are not allowed to question her, but she can question everyone else. That is not accountability, and it is not biblical. Allie’s response embodied the love described in 1 Corinthians 13: patient, kind, not boastful, not dishonoring, rejoicing in truth. Candace’s response did not reflect any of that. It was not loving, not rooted in Scripture, and not reflective of the Spirit. Christians need to pay attention to this. We are called to test every spirit, to judge righteously, and to discern when someone’s influence is pulling people toward truth or toward confusion. What Allie displayed is the model. What Candace displayed is not.

Watching Allie Beth Stuckey respond to Candace Owens was a masterclass in what Christian correction should look like. Allie addressed the conspiracy claims with clarity, Scripture, and love. She pointed people to Christ, offered biblical principles for discernment, and handled the situation with grace that many of us (including me) can aspire to. And yet Candace responded by calling her a “fake Christian.” Anyone who has followed Allie’s work knows how unfair and disingenuous that is. Her fruits speak for themselves. She is thoughtful, rooted in Scripture, and consistently reflects the character of Christ in how she communicates. What confuses me is this double standard: Candace can flippantly accuse others, imply dark motives, and stir fear without evidence… but the moment someone pushes back with facts, Scripture, and clarity, suddenly they are the problem. You are not allowed to question her, but she can question everyone else. That is not accountability, and it is not biblical. Allie’s response embodied the love described in 1 Corinthians 13: patient, kind, not boastful, not dishonoring, rejoicing in truth. Candace’s response did not reflect any of that. It was not loving, not rooted in Scripture, and not reflective of the Spirit. Christians need to pay attention to this. We are called to test every spirit, to judge righteously, and to discern when someone’s influence is pulling people toward truth or toward confusion. What Allie displayed is the model. What Candace displayed is not.

NΛTLY DΞNISΞ

47,956 views • 10 months ago