正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

Form the first idea.. to the final touch ☁️ ทุกขั้นตอน.. เพื่อ “สัมผัสใหม่” ที่ผิวคุณจะรู้สึกถึงการปกป้องทันที Launching Tomorrow 👀 #SmoothE #ZeroFeel #SomethingNewIsComing #SkinInnovation #น้องออม #ออมกรณ์นภัส #ormkornnaphat #กันแดดน้องออม

SmoothEThailand's profile picture

Smooth E Official

10,868 subscribers

25,875 次观看 • 4 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

健康养生#SmoothE#ZeroFeel#SomethingNewIsComing#SkinInnovation#น้องออม#ออมกรณ์นภัส#ormkornnaphat#กันแดดน้องออม
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

BEHIND THE SCENES เบื้องหลังความ “เบาสบาย” ของน้องออม ☁️ แต่ทำจริงไม่เบาเลยนะ กว่าจะได้กันแดดที่ “เบาเหมือนไม่ทา…แต่ปกป้องได้จริง” ทุกช็อต ทุกรายละเอียด ถูกคิดมาเพื่อผิวของทุกคน #SmoothE #SunZeroFeel #กันแดดZeroFeel #กันแดดสัมผัสเมฆ #กันแดดน้องออม #ormkornnaphat #ออมกรณ์นภัส
0:38

BEHIND THE SCENES เบื้องหลังความ “เบาสบาย” ของน้องออม ☁️ แต่ทำจริงไม่เบาเลยนะ กว่าจะได้กันแดดที่ “เบาเหมือนไม่ทา…แต่ปกป้องได้จริง” ทุกช็อต ทุกรายละเอียด ถูกคิดมาเพื่อผิวของทุกคน #SmoothE #SunZeroFeel #กันแดดZeroFeel #กันแดดสัมผัสเมฆ #กันแดดน้องออม #ormkornnaphat #ออมกรณ์นภัส

Smooth E Official

85,074 次观看 • 4 个月前

We are so excited to show our first teaser from the soundtrack of our musical launching March 15th! 🥳 Listen here and we have a special challenge coming tomorrow! 👀
0:22

We are so excited to show our first teaser from the soundtrack of our musical launching March 15th! 🥳 Listen here and we have a special challenge coming tomorrow! 👀

Now United

91,417 次观看 • 3 年前

Introducing the UK’s first *ever* X Originals series: Keeping the Faith Come behind the scenes on our return to the Premier League across the 2025/26 season 👀 Launching tomorrow at 16:00 BST exclusively on our X channel ⏳
0:53

Introducing the UK’s first *ever* X Originals series: Keeping the Faith Come behind the scenes on our return to the Premier League across the 2025/26 season 👀 Launching tomorrow at 16:00 BST exclusively on our X channel ⏳

Burnley FC

127,676 次观看 • 11 个月前

LITTLER KO's CLAYTON! ☢️ Luke Littler is through to his first World Grand Prix final! The World Champion dispatches Jonny Clayton 5-1 to set up a blockbuster clash with Luke Humphries tomorrow night! 👀 📺 #WGPDarts | SFs
1:34

LITTLER KO's CLAYTON! ☢️ Luke Littler is through to his first World Grand Prix final! The World Champion dispatches Jonny Clayton 5-1 to set up a blockbuster clash with Luke Humphries tomorrow night! 👀 📺 #WGPDarts | SFs

PDC Darts

103,561 次观看 • 10 个月前

A new slate of originals is here. Horror. Romance. Fantasy. Anime. Comedy. Mystery. All crafted with Director Mode in CapCut Video Studio. Built for AI drama series, films, and long-form videos, Director Mode gives your idea the room to grow into something complete. One person can take a first concept all the way to a finished original — with story, characters, scenes, and visual direction staying consistent throughout. Coming soon: a behind-the-scenes look at how these originals took shape in Director Mode, from first idea to final frame. What direction would your story take?
0:52

A new slate of originals is here. Horror. Romance. Fantasy. Anime. Comedy. Mystery. All crafted with Director Mode in CapCut Video Studio. Built for AI drama series, films, and long-form videos, Director Mode gives your idea the room to grow into something complete. One person can take a first concept all the way to a finished original — with story, characters, scenes, and visual direction staying consistent throughout. Coming soon: a behind-the-scenes look at how these originals took shape in Director Mode, from first idea to final frame. What direction would your story take?

CapCut

204,550 次观看 • 2 个月前

How does Lamborghini turn a wild idea into a road ripping machine? 🤯 In this behind the scenes look, we explore how Lamborghini built the most absurd supercar ever, from the first sketch to the final on track roar. See the design philosophy, the carbon fiber chassis, the engine tuning, and the brutal testing that pushes every part to its limit. It's precision, craft, and relentless problem solving at every turn. 👀
2:44

How does Lamborghini turn a wild idea into a road ripping machine? 🤯 In this behind the scenes look, we explore how Lamborghini built the most absurd supercar ever, from the first sketch to the final on track roar. See the design philosophy, the carbon fiber chassis, the engine tuning, and the brutal testing that pushes every part to its limit. It's precision, craft, and relentless problem solving at every turn. 👀

BILLIONAIRE COLLECTION ®

22,404 次观看 • 2 个月前

[#BVLGARI] WATCH 🎥: BVLGARI FRIEND OF HOUSE THAILAND, ORM KORNNAPHAT (orm kornnaphat🌈(ภีรชา พชรฐากูร แอคจริง555)) ON “HOMECOMING”, GROWTH AND SPOILERS FOR 🎁 Returning to Singapore as Friend of the House Thailand, Orm Kornnaphat graced the Bvlgari High Jewelry Trunk Show Gala Dinner with effortless elegance, embodying the Maison’s timeless sophistication throughout the evening 🐍💎 The past year has marked a defining chapter in her journey with Bvlgari — one that continues to evolve alongside her rapid personal and professional growth — making this return yet another milestone moment. In our latest chat with her, Orm shares why Singapore feels like a homecoming, reflects on staying grounded despite her rising success, and shares her hopes for what’s next. But the real moment? 👀 She teases another spoiler for #วาดฝันวันวิวาห์ #InLoveForeverTheSeries — something “super special”! Catch the conversation before the first episode drops tonight, and don’t forget to send us your guesses 😭💍 🎥 Watch the full interview now, exclusively on Seoully Singapore! ❤️‍🔥 ORM FRIEND OF BVLGARI #ORMxBvlgariHighJewelrySG #OrmFriendofBvlgari Bvlgari #OrmKornnaphat #ออมกรณ์นภัส
1:43

[#BVLGARI] WATCH 🎥: BVLGARI FRIEND OF HOUSE THAILAND, ORM KORNNAPHAT (orm kornnaphat🌈(ภีรชา พชรฐากูร แอคจริง555)) ON “HOMECOMING”, GROWTH AND SPOILERS FOR 🎁 Returning to Singapore as Friend of the House Thailand, Orm Kornnaphat graced the Bvlgari High Jewelry Trunk Show Gala Dinner with effortless elegance, embodying the Maison’s timeless sophistication throughout the evening 🐍💎 The past year has marked a defining chapter in her journey with Bvlgari — one that continues to evolve alongside her rapid personal and professional growth — making this return yet another milestone moment. In our latest chat with her, Orm shares why Singapore feels like a homecoming, reflects on staying grounded despite her rising success, and shares her hopes for what’s next. But the real moment? 👀 She teases another spoiler for #วาดฝันวันวิวาห์ #InLoveForeverTheSeries — something “super special”! Catch the conversation before the first episode drops tonight, and don’t forget to send us your guesses 😭💍 🎥 Watch the full interview now, exclusively on Seoully Singapore! ❤️‍🔥 ORM FRIEND OF BVLGARI #ORMxBvlgariHighJewelrySG #OrmFriendofBvlgari Bvlgari #OrmKornnaphat #ออมกรณ์นภัส

Seoully Singapore

28,324 次观看 • 2 个月前

The Apprentices are finally coming to Cardano.✊ The first 100% hand-crafted collection, each one of the 4333 pieces was meticulously curated, one by one. No one has ever done this. After working for two years in the art we are proud to reveal today our anime concept teaser and finally announce a mint date, so watch until the end of the video. We believe in ourselves, and we took our time to create a unique and original collection with the highest art standards. With an experienced team we forged a dream, an idea that may unite anime lovers across all chains. We want to inspire people and change the meta. Nothing in this collection was generated. We are many things, but overall we are an anime entertainment project, and we show you we have the knowledge to do animation even before launching, thats our level of commitment. We want to thank all the USTRA Founders that have been here supporting our journey since the early days, this wouldn't be possible without you. Expect lots of news and 1/1 reveals for the upcoming weeks. Last but not least, our Whitelist Application form will be opening in our website later this week. Stay tuned for more news and meanwhile join our discord server to meet the community. Vade Cum Lumine⚛️ 🚨Engage=WL🚨
2:16

The Apprentices are finally coming to Cardano.✊ The first 100% hand-crafted collection, each one of the 4333 pieces was meticulously curated, one by one. No one has ever done this. After working for two years in the art we are proud to reveal today our anime concept teaser and finally announce a mint date, so watch until the end of the video. We believe in ourselves, and we took our time to create a unique and original collection with the highest art standards. With an experienced team we forged a dream, an idea that may unite anime lovers across all chains. We want to inspire people and change the meta. Nothing in this collection was generated. We are many things, but overall we are an anime entertainment project, and we show you we have the knowledge to do animation even before launching, thats our level of commitment. We want to thank all the USTRA Founders that have been here supporting our journey since the early days, this wouldn't be possible without you. Expect lots of news and 1/1 reveals for the upcoming weeks. Last but not least, our Whitelist Application form will be opening in our website later this week. Stay tuned for more news and meanwhile join our discord server to meet the community. Vade Cum Lumine⚛️ 🚨Engage=WL🚨

APPRENTICES⚛ | MINTING NOW!

33,106 次观看 • 3 年前

This is a birthday surprise, both unexpected, yet deeply anticipated. 🎂✨ From the moment we learned this fan meeting would happen, we wanted to turn it into a birthday celebration. Just like last year in Macau, we dreamed of creating that same magic for you again. But we kept asking ourselves “how do we at least match what we did before?” 🤔💭 With limited hands and resources, the final result may not be perfect. But today, what we've accomplished together is truly the best we could give, within our ability, within our time. 💪💖 Thank you, our dear Orm. Seeing you happy is all the satisfaction we'll ever need. 🥹💕 And thank you to every fan here today. It was your energy, your love, and the atmosphere you created that turned this into a birthday party so full of warmth and positivity. 🫶🎉 None of us knows what tomorrow holds. But this very moment, today, is something we will carry in our hearts, forever. 🌟💝 🎡 𝑶𝒓𝒎’𝒔 𝑪𝒂𝒓𝒏𝒊𝒗𝒂𝒍 🎡 𝑯𝒂𝒑𝒑𝒚 𝑶𝒓𝒎’𝒔 𝑫𝒂𝒚! 🎉 🩷 Love From Chinese Omelette 🤍 ORM BLOSSOMIN BODY CARE #ORMkornnaphatxBlossomin #OrmKornnaphat #ออมกรณ์นภัส orm kornnaphat🌈
0:45

This is a birthday surprise, both unexpected, yet deeply anticipated. 🎂✨ From the moment we learned this fan meeting would happen, we wanted to turn it into a birthday celebration. Just like last year in Macau, we dreamed of creating that same magic for you again. But we kept asking ourselves “how do we at least match what we did before?” 🤔💭 With limited hands and resources, the final result may not be perfect. But today, what we've accomplished together is truly the best we could give, within our ability, within our time. 💪💖 Thank you, our dear Orm. Seeing you happy is all the satisfaction we'll ever need. 🥹💕 And thank you to every fan here today. It was your energy, your love, and the atmosphere you created that turned this into a birthday party so full of warmth and positivity. 🫶🎉 None of us knows what tomorrow holds. But this very moment, today, is something we will carry in our hearts, forever. 🌟💝 🎡 𝑶𝒓𝒎’𝒔 𝑪𝒂𝒓𝒏𝒊𝒗𝒂𝒍 🎡 𝑯𝒂𝒑𝒑𝒚 𝑶𝒓𝒎’𝒔 𝑫𝒂𝒚! 🎉 🩷 Love From Chinese Omelette 🤍 ORM BLOSSOMIN BODY CARE #ORMkornnaphatxBlossomin #OrmKornnaphat #ออมกรณ์นภัส orm kornnaphat🌈

OrmKornnaphat_CN

11,944 次观看 • 3 个月前

AI makes intelligence digital. Crypto makes institutions digital. And if intelligence is becoming software, it’s going to need institutions that are software too. That intersection is where I’ve been spending most of my time, trying to understand, in the details, how these systems actually work: how consensus holds up, how markets are designed, how governance behaves under pressure, where privacy fits, and what tradeoffs all of it forces. But most conversation in the ecosystem stays at the level of narratives. The mechanism stays implicit. And if we’re serious about building institutions for digital intelligence, we can’t treat design like a black box. So I’m launching TheCoordinate, a long-form podcast with the researchers and builders pushing the frontier where blockchain and AI meet. Some have shaped major systems. Some wrote foundational papers. All of them are expanding what’s possible at the intersection of intelligence and institutions. The format is simple: each episode I pick a topic, do the homework (read the papers, study the systems), then sit down with the people doing the work and ask the real questions, especially the parts I’m genuinely confused about, until we can build a clear mental model. If you want rigorous conversations about how digital intelligence and digital institutions can co-evolve, subscribe to TheCoordinate. First episode tomorrow. 🎙️🔜
1:40

AI makes intelligence digital. Crypto makes institutions digital. And if intelligence is becoming software, it’s going to need institutions that are software too. That intersection is where I’ve been spending most of my time, trying to understand, in the details, how these systems actually work: how consensus holds up, how markets are designed, how governance behaves under pressure, where privacy fits, and what tradeoffs all of it forces. But most conversation in the ecosystem stays at the level of narratives. The mechanism stays implicit. And if we’re serious about building institutions for digital intelligence, we can’t treat design like a black box. So I’m launching TheCoordinate, a long-form podcast with the researchers and builders pushing the frontier where blockchain and AI meet. Some have shaped major systems. Some wrote foundational papers. All of them are expanding what’s possible at the intersection of intelligence and institutions. The format is simple: each episode I pick a topic, do the homework (read the papers, study the systems), then sit down with the people doing the work and ask the real questions, especially the parts I’m genuinely confused about, until we can build a clear mental model. If you want rigorous conversations about how digital intelligence and digital institutions can co-evolve, subscribe to TheCoordinate. First episode tomorrow. 🎙️🔜

Soubhik Deb

11,344 次观看 • 6 个月前

The fastest YouTube path to a BMW M4 starts with a nursery rhyme that already has 379 million views. The workflow does not begin with guessing what children might watch. It begins with proven demand. She opens a popular kids channel, studies the videos already pulling hundreds of millions of views, then asks ChatGPT for original nursery rhyme ideas built around the same retention mechanics. After choosing one, ChatGPT turns it into a complete one-minute episode with a scene-by-scene breakdown, character actions, camera direction and visual prompts. That plan goes directly into Picsart AI Playground. Within two or three minutes, it produces a finished animated episode without cameras, drawing skills or an animation team. The same idea does not stop at one upload. The full episode goes to long-form YouTube, its strongest moments become Shorts, and the recurring character returns in the next story. That final part matters most. Random AI cartoons might generate temporary views. A recognizable character gives children something familiar to search for, replay and watch again the next morning. Anyone can generate the first episode now. The real advantage belongs to whoever studies the data, improves the format and turns one character into a library of one hundred videos. The entire workflow takes 49 seconds to watch. Bookmark it before your feed buries it.
0:46

The fastest YouTube path to a BMW M4 starts with a nursery rhyme that already has 379 million views. The workflow does not begin with guessing what children might watch. It begins with proven demand. She opens a popular kids channel, studies the videos already pulling hundreds of millions of views, then asks ChatGPT for original nursery rhyme ideas built around the same retention mechanics. After choosing one, ChatGPT turns it into a complete one-minute episode with a scene-by-scene breakdown, character actions, camera direction and visual prompts. That plan goes directly into Picsart AI Playground. Within two or three minutes, it produces a finished animated episode without cameras, drawing skills or an animation team. The same idea does not stop at one upload. The full episode goes to long-form YouTube, its strongest moments become Shorts, and the recurring character returns in the next story. That final part matters most. Random AI cartoons might generate temporary views. A recognizable character gives children something familiar to search for, replay and watch again the next morning. Anyone can generate the first episode now. The real advantage belongs to whoever studies the data, improves the format and turns one character into a library of one hundred videos. The entire workflow takes 49 seconds to watch. Bookmark it before your feed buries it.

Kiyoro

194,464 次观看 • 12 天前

I've built an AI agent that generates a logline of its choosing, creates text-to-video clips via 'scenes' it prompts with Luma, and then stitches them together automatically—even adding background music if you happen to have some present! At first, I let the model run wild—no direction, just "generate an interesting logline & prompts", basically. The results were quite interesting, but style was a bit all over the place (which was kinda cool in some ways actually). Then, I refined the prompt it was using to create the content—attempting to focus on cinematic feeling, character consistency (age, hair, ethnicity, name), and visual style. The idea is to build it out so that it can (hopefully) stick to genre, director influence, and a cohesive color palette. That will take some time, though. The agent is fully autonomous. It: Writes a story/logline and then the corresponding prompts Generates video clips Downloads them Stitches them into a final video (Optional) Adds background music all in one shot (it just takes ~5-10 minutes, and generates 17 clips or so at this time - I was using 30 as well but shortened it to test). You can upload your own background music to merge seamlessly, too. I'm working on more integrations to refine the output even further. Right now, I want everyone to try it out, but you'll likely need to upload your own API keys (because I'm broke 😂). Still figuring out the best way to share it! I'll have to explore Replit or Gradio, but that will be a little bit either tonight or tomorrow. The final video below shows where it's at as of right now. And in the comments, I’ve included different outputs—some completely chaotic, others more polished after prompt tuning.
1:24

I've built an AI agent that generates a logline of its choosing, creates text-to-video clips via 'scenes' it prompts with Luma, and then stitches them together automatically—even adding background music if you happen to have some present! At first, I let the model run wild—no direction, just "generate an interesting logline & prompts", basically. The results were quite interesting, but style was a bit all over the place (which was kinda cool in some ways actually). Then, I refined the prompt it was using to create the content—attempting to focus on cinematic feeling, character consistency (age, hair, ethnicity, name), and visual style. The idea is to build it out so that it can (hopefully) stick to genre, director influence, and a cohesive color palette. That will take some time, though. The agent is fully autonomous. It: Writes a story/logline and then the corresponding prompts Generates video clips Downloads them Stitches them into a final video (Optional) Adds background music all in one shot (it just takes ~5-10 minutes, and generates 17 clips or so at this time - I was using 30 as well but shortened it to test). You can upload your own background music to merge seamlessly, too. I'm working on more integrations to refine the output even further. Right now, I want everyone to try it out, but you'll likely need to upload your own API keys (because I'm broke 😂). Still figuring out the best way to share it! I'll have to explore Replit or Gradio, but that will be a little bit either tonight or tomorrow. The final video below shows where it's at as of right now. And in the comments, I’ve included different outputs—some completely chaotic, others more polished after prompt tuning.

Kiri

69,476 次观看 • 1 年前

50 years ago yesterday: U.N. General Assembly adopts initial draft resolution declaring Zionism to be “a form of racism.” U.S. Ambassador Daniel Patrick Moynihan delivered this historic speech when the infamous act was ratified on Nov. 10, 1975: 🇺🇸 “There appears to have developed in the United Nations the practice for a number of countries to combine for the purpose of doing something outrageous, and thereafter, the outrageous thing having been done, to profess themselves outraged by those who have the temerity to point it out, and subsequently to declare themselves innocent of any wrong-doing in consequence of its having been brought about wholly in reaction to the “insufferable” acts of those who pointed the wrong-doing out in the first place. Out of deference to these curious sensibilities, the United States chose not to speak in advance of this vote: we speak in its aftermath and in tones of the utmost concern. The United States rises to declare before the General Assembly of the United Nations, and before the world, that it does not acknowledge, it will not abide by, it will never acquiesce in this infamous act. Not three weeks ago, the United States Representative in the Social, Humanitarian, and Cultural Committee pleaded in measured and fully considered terms for the United Nations not to do this thing. It was, he said, “obscene.” It is something more today, for the furtiveness with which this obscenity first appeared among us has been replaced by a shameless openness. There will be time enough to contemplate the harm this act will have done the United Nations. Historians will do that for us, and it is sufficient for the moment only to note the foreboding fact. A great evil has been loosed upon the world. The abomination of anti-semitism — as this year’s Nobel Peace Laureate Andrei Sakharov observed in Moscow just a few days ago — the Abomination of anti-semitism has been given the appearance of international sanction. The General Assembly today grants symbolic amnesty — and more — to the murderers of the six million European Jews. Evil enough in itself, but more ominous by far is the realization that now presses upon us — the realization that if there were no General Assembly, this could never have happened. As this day will live in infamy, it behooves those who sought to avert it to declare their thoughts so that historians will know that we fought here, that we were not small in number — not this time — and that while we lost, we fought with full knowledge of what indeed would be lost. Nor should any historian of the event, nor yet any who have participated in it, suppose, that we have fought only as governments, as chancelleries, and on an issue well removed from the concerns of our respective peoples. Others will speak for their nations: I will speak for mine. In all our postwar history there had not been another issue which has brought forth such unanimity of American opinion. The President of the United States has from the first been explicit: This must not happen. The Congress of the United States in a measure unanimously adopted in the Senate and sponsored by 436 of 437 Representatives in the House, declared its utter opposition. Following only American Jews themselves, the American trade union movements was first to the fore in denouncing this infamous undertaking. Next, one after another, the great private institutions of American life pronounced anathema in this evil thing — and most particularly, the Christian churches have done so. Reminded that the United Nations was born in struggle against just such abominations as we are committing today — the wartime alliance of the United Nations dates from 1942 — the United Nations Association of the United States has for the first time in its history appealed directly to each of the 141 other delegations in New York not to do this unspeakable thing. The proposition to be sanctioned by a resolution of the General Assembly of the United Nations is that “Zionism is a form of racism and racial discrimination.” Now this is a lie. But as it is a lie which the United Nations has now declared to be a truth, the actual truth must be restated. The very first point to be made is that the United Nations has declared Zionism to be racism — without ever having defined racism. “Sentence first — verdict afterwards,” as the Queen of Hearts said. But this is not wonderland, but a real world, where there are real consequences to folly and to venality. Just on Friday, the President of the General Assembly, speaking on behalf of Luxembourg, warned not only of the trouble which would follow from the adoption of this resolution but of its essential irresponsibility — for, he noted, members have wholly different ideas as to what they are condemning. “It seems to me that before a body like this takes a decision they should agree very clearly on what they are approving or condemning, and it takes more time.” Lest I be unclear, the United Nations has in fact on several occasions defined “racial discrimination.” The definitions have been loose, but recognizable. It is “racism,” incomparably the more serious charge — racial discrimination is a practice; racism is a doctrine — which has never been defined. Indeed, the term has only recently appeared in the United Nations General Assembly documents. The one occasion on which we know the meaning to have been discussed was the 1644th meeting of the Third Committee on December 16, 1968, in connection with the report of the Secretary-General on the status of the international convention on the elimination of all racial discrimination. On that occasion — to give some feeling for the intellectual precision with which the matter was being treated — the question arose, as to what should be the relative positioning of the terms “racism” and “Nazism” in a number of the “preambular paragraphs.” The distinguished delegate from Tunisia argued that “racism” should go first because “Nazism was merely a form of racism.” Not so, said the no less distinguished delegate from the Union Soviet Socialist Republics. For, he explained, “Nazism contained the main elements of racism within its ambit and should be mentioned first.” This is to say that racism was merely a form of Nazism. The discussion wound to its weary and inconclusive end, and we are left with nothing to guide us for even this one discussion of “racism” confined itself to world orders in preambular paragraphs, and did not at all touch on the meaning of the words as such. Still, one cannot but ponder the situation we have made for ourselves in the context of the Soviet statement on that not so distant occasion. If, as the distinguished delegate declared, racism is a form of Nazism — and if, as this resolution declares, Zionism is a form of racism — then we have step to step taken ourselves to the point of proclaiming — the United Nations is solemnly proclaiming — that Zionism is a form of Nazism. What we have here is a lie — a political lie of a variety well known to the twentieth century, and scarcely exceeded in all that annal of untruth and outrage. The lie is that Zionism is a form of racism. The overwhelmingly clear truth is that is it not. The word “racism” is a creation of the English language, and relatively new to it. It is not, for instance, to be found in the Oxford English Dictionary (appears in 1982 supplement to Oxford Dictionary). The term derives from relatively new doctrines — all of them discredited — concerning the human population of the world, to the effect that there are significant biological differences among clearly identifiable groups, and that these differences establish, in effect, different levels of humanity. Racism, as defined in Webster’s Third New International Dictionary, is “The Assumption that . . . traits and capacities are determined by biological race and that races differ decisively from one another.” It further involves “a belief in the inherent superiority of a particular race and its right to dominate over others.” This meaning is clear. It is equally clear that this assumption, this belief, has always been altogether alien to the political and religious movement known as Zionism. As a strictly political movement, Zionism was established only in 1897, although there is a clearly legitimate sense in which its origins are indeed ancient. For example, many branches of Christianity have always held that from the standpoint of biblical prophets, Israel would be reborn one day. But the modern Zionism movement arose in Europe in the context of a general upsurge of national consciousness and aspiration that overtook most other people of Central and Eastern Europe after 1848, and that in time spread to all of Africa and Asia. It was, to those persons of the Jewish religion, a Jewish form of what today is called a national liberation movement. Probably a majority of those persons who became active Zionists and sought to emigrate to Palestine were born within the confines of Czarist Russia, and it was only natural for Soviet Prime Minister Andrei Gromyko to deplore, as he did in 1948, in the 299th meeting of the Security Council, the act by Israel’s neighbors of “sending troops into Palestine and carrying out military operations aimed” — in Mr. Gromyko’s words — at the suppression of the national liberation movement in Palestine.” Now it was the singular nature — if, I am not mistaken, it was the unique nature — of this national liberation movement that in contrast with the movements that preceded it, those of that time, and those that have come since, it defined its members in terms not of birth, but of belief. That is to say, it was not a movement of the Irish to free Ireland, or of the Polish to free Poland, not a movement of the Algerians to free Algeria, nor of Indians to free India. It was not a movement of persons connected by historic membership to a genetic pool of the kind that enables us to speak loosely but not meaninglessly, say, of the Chinese people, nor yet of diverse groups occupying the same territory which enables us to speak if the American people with no greater indignity to truth. To the contrary, Zionists defined themselves merely as Jews, and declared to be Jewish anyone born of a Jewish mother or — and this is the absolutely crucial fact — anyone who converted to Judaism. Which is to say, in terms of International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, adopted by the 20th General Assembly, anyone — regardless of “race, colour, descent, or nationally or ethnic origin …..” The state of Israel, which in time was the creation of the Zionist Movement, has been extraordinary in nothing so much as the range of “racial stocks” from which it Orient and Jew from the West. Most such persons could be said to have been “born” Jewish, just as most Presbyterians and most Hindus are “born” to their faith, but there are many Jews who are just converts. With a consistency in the matter which surely attests to the importance of this issue to that religions and political culture, Israeli courts have held that a Jew who converts to another religion is no longer a Jew. In the meantime the population of Israel also includes large numbers of non-Jews, among them Arabs of both the Muslim and Christian religions and Christians of other national origins. Many of these persons are citizens of Israel, and those who are not can become citizens by legal procedures very much like those which obtain in a typical nation of Western Europe. Now I should wish to be understood that I am here making one point, and one point only, which is that whatever else Zionism may be, it is not and cannot be “a form of racism.” In logic, the State of Israel could be, or could become, many things, theoretically, including many things undesirable, but it could not be and could not become racism unless it ceased to be Zionist. Indeed, the idea that Jews are a “race” was invented not by Jews but by those who hated Jews. The idea of Jews as a race was invented by nineteenth century anti-semites such as Houston Steward Chamberlain and Edouard Drumont, who saw that in an increasingly secular age, which is to say an age made for fewer distinctions between people, the old religions grounds for anti-semitism were losing force. New justifications were needed for excluding and persecuting Jews, and so the new idea of Jews as a race — rather than as a religion — was born. It was a contemptible idea at the beginning, and no civilized person would be associated with it. To think that it is an idea now endorsed by the United Nations is to reflect on what civilization has come to. It is precisely a concern for civilization, for civilized values that are or should be precious to all mankind, that arouses us at this moment to such special passion. What we have at stake here is not merely the honor and the legitimacy of the State of Israel — although a challenge to the legitimacy of any member nation ought always to arouse the vigilance of all members of the United Nations. For a yet more important matter is at issue, which is the integrity of the whole body of moral and legal precepts which we know as human rights. The terrible lie that has been told here today will have terrible consequences. Not only will people begin to say, indeed they have already begun to say that the United Nations is a place where lies are told, but far more serious, grave and perhaps irreparable harm will be done to the cause of human rights itself. The harm will arise first because it will strip from racism the precise and abhorrent meaning that it still precariously holds today. How will the people of the world feel about racism and the need to struggle against it, when they are told that it is an idea as broad as to include the Jewish national liberation movement? As the lie spreads, it will do harm in a second way. Many of the members of the United Nations owe their independence in no small part to the notion of human rights, as it has spread from the domestic sphere to the international sphere exercised its influence over the old colonial powers. We are now coming into a time when that independence is likely to be threatened again. There will be new forces, some of them arising now, new prophets and new despots, who will justify their actions with the help of just such distortions of words as we have sanctioned here today. Today we have drained the word “racism” of its meaning. Tomorrow, terms like “national self-determination” and “national honor” will be perverted in the same way to serve the purposes of conquest and exploitation. And when these claims begin to be made — as they already have begun to be made — it is the small nations of the world whose integrity will suffer. And how will the small nations of the world defend themselves, on what grounds will others be moved to defend and protect them, when the language of human rights, the only language by which the small can be defended, is no longer believed and no longer has a power of its own? There is this danger, and then a final danger that is the most serious of all. Which is that the damage we now do to the idea of human rights and the language of human rights could well be irreversible. The idea of human rights as we know it today is not an idea which has always existed in human affairs, it is an idea which appeared at a specific time in the world, and under very special circumstances. It appeared when European philosophers of the seventeenth century began to argue that man was a being whose existence was independent from that of the State, that he need join a political community only if he did not lose by that association more than he gained. From this very specific political philosophy stemmed the idea of political rights, of claims that the individual could justly make against the state; it was because the individual was seen as so separate from the State that he could make legitimate demands upon it. That was the philosophy from which the idea of domestic and international rights sprang. But most of the world does not hold with that philosophy now. Most of the world believes in newer modes of political thought, in philosophies that do not accept the individual as distinct from and prior to the State, in philosophies that therefore do not provide any justification for the idea of human rights and philosophies that have no words by which to explain their value. If we destroy the words that were given to us by past centuries, we will not have words to replace them, for philosophy today has no such words. But there are those of us who have not forsaken these older words, still so new to much of the world. Not forsaken them now, not here, not anywhere, not ever. The United States of America declares that it does not acknowledge, it will not abide by, it will never acquiesce in this infamous act.”
24:35

50 years ago yesterday: U.N. General Assembly adopts initial draft resolution declaring Zionism to be “a form of racism.” U.S. Ambassador Daniel Patrick Moynihan delivered this historic speech when the infamous act was ratified on Nov. 10, 1975: 🇺🇸 “There appears to have developed in the United Nations the practice for a number of countries to combine for the purpose of doing something outrageous, and thereafter, the outrageous thing having been done, to profess themselves outraged by those who have the temerity to point it out, and subsequently to declare themselves innocent of any wrong-doing in consequence of its having been brought about wholly in reaction to the “insufferable” acts of those who pointed the wrong-doing out in the first place. Out of deference to these curious sensibilities, the United States chose not to speak in advance of this vote: we speak in its aftermath and in tones of the utmost concern. The United States rises to declare before the General Assembly of the United Nations, and before the world, that it does not acknowledge, it will not abide by, it will never acquiesce in this infamous act. Not three weeks ago, the United States Representative in the Social, Humanitarian, and Cultural Committee pleaded in measured and fully considered terms for the United Nations not to do this thing. It was, he said, “obscene.” It is something more today, for the furtiveness with which this obscenity first appeared among us has been replaced by a shameless openness. There will be time enough to contemplate the harm this act will have done the United Nations. Historians will do that for us, and it is sufficient for the moment only to note the foreboding fact. A great evil has been loosed upon the world. The abomination of anti-semitism — as this year’s Nobel Peace Laureate Andrei Sakharov observed in Moscow just a few days ago — the Abomination of anti-semitism has been given the appearance of international sanction. The General Assembly today grants symbolic amnesty — and more — to the murderers of the six million European Jews. Evil enough in itself, but more ominous by far is the realization that now presses upon us — the realization that if there were no General Assembly, this could never have happened. As this day will live in infamy, it behooves those who sought to avert it to declare their thoughts so that historians will know that we fought here, that we were not small in number — not this time — and that while we lost, we fought with full knowledge of what indeed would be lost. Nor should any historian of the event, nor yet any who have participated in it, suppose, that we have fought only as governments, as chancelleries, and on an issue well removed from the concerns of our respective peoples. Others will speak for their nations: I will speak for mine. In all our postwar history there had not been another issue which has brought forth such unanimity of American opinion. The President of the United States has from the first been explicit: This must not happen. The Congress of the United States in a measure unanimously adopted in the Senate and sponsored by 436 of 437 Representatives in the House, declared its utter opposition. Following only American Jews themselves, the American trade union movements was first to the fore in denouncing this infamous undertaking. Next, one after another, the great private institutions of American life pronounced anathema in this evil thing — and most particularly, the Christian churches have done so. Reminded that the United Nations was born in struggle against just such abominations as we are committing today — the wartime alliance of the United Nations dates from 1942 — the United Nations Association of the United States has for the first time in its history appealed directly to each of the 141 other delegations in New York not to do this unspeakable thing. The proposition to be sanctioned by a resolution of the General Assembly of the United Nations is that “Zionism is a form of racism and racial discrimination.” Now this is a lie. But as it is a lie which the United Nations has now declared to be a truth, the actual truth must be restated. The very first point to be made is that the United Nations has declared Zionism to be racism — without ever having defined racism. “Sentence first — verdict afterwards,” as the Queen of Hearts said. But this is not wonderland, but a real world, where there are real consequences to folly and to venality. Just on Friday, the President of the General Assembly, speaking on behalf of Luxembourg, warned not only of the trouble which would follow from the adoption of this resolution but of its essential irresponsibility — for, he noted, members have wholly different ideas as to what they are condemning. “It seems to me that before a body like this takes a decision they should agree very clearly on what they are approving or condemning, and it takes more time.” Lest I be unclear, the United Nations has in fact on several occasions defined “racial discrimination.” The definitions have been loose, but recognizable. It is “racism,” incomparably the more serious charge — racial discrimination is a practice; racism is a doctrine — which has never been defined. Indeed, the term has only recently appeared in the United Nations General Assembly documents. The one occasion on which we know the meaning to have been discussed was the 1644th meeting of the Third Committee on December 16, 1968, in connection with the report of the Secretary-General on the status of the international convention on the elimination of all racial discrimination. On that occasion — to give some feeling for the intellectual precision with which the matter was being treated — the question arose, as to what should be the relative positioning of the terms “racism” and “Nazism” in a number of the “preambular paragraphs.” The distinguished delegate from Tunisia argued that “racism” should go first because “Nazism was merely a form of racism.” Not so, said the no less distinguished delegate from the Union Soviet Socialist Republics. For, he explained, “Nazism contained the main elements of racism within its ambit and should be mentioned first.” This is to say that racism was merely a form of Nazism. The discussion wound to its weary and inconclusive end, and we are left with nothing to guide us for even this one discussion of “racism” confined itself to world orders in preambular paragraphs, and did not at all touch on the meaning of the words as such. Still, one cannot but ponder the situation we have made for ourselves in the context of the Soviet statement on that not so distant occasion. If, as the distinguished delegate declared, racism is a form of Nazism — and if, as this resolution declares, Zionism is a form of racism — then we have step to step taken ourselves to the point of proclaiming — the United Nations is solemnly proclaiming — that Zionism is a form of Nazism. What we have here is a lie — a political lie of a variety well known to the twentieth century, and scarcely exceeded in all that annal of untruth and outrage. The lie is that Zionism is a form of racism. The overwhelmingly clear truth is that is it not. The word “racism” is a creation of the English language, and relatively new to it. It is not, for instance, to be found in the Oxford English Dictionary (appears in 1982 supplement to Oxford Dictionary). The term derives from relatively new doctrines — all of them discredited — concerning the human population of the world, to the effect that there are significant biological differences among clearly identifiable groups, and that these differences establish, in effect, different levels of humanity. Racism, as defined in Webster’s Third New International Dictionary, is “The Assumption that . . . traits and capacities are determined by biological race and that races differ decisively from one another.” It further involves “a belief in the inherent superiority of a particular race and its right to dominate over others.” This meaning is clear. It is equally clear that this assumption, this belief, has always been altogether alien to the political and religious movement known as Zionism. As a strictly political movement, Zionism was established only in 1897, although there is a clearly legitimate sense in which its origins are indeed ancient. For example, many branches of Christianity have always held that from the standpoint of biblical prophets, Israel would be reborn one day. But the modern Zionism movement arose in Europe in the context of a general upsurge of national consciousness and aspiration that overtook most other people of Central and Eastern Europe after 1848, and that in time spread to all of Africa and Asia. It was, to those persons of the Jewish religion, a Jewish form of what today is called a national liberation movement. Probably a majority of those persons who became active Zionists and sought to emigrate to Palestine were born within the confines of Czarist Russia, and it was only natural for Soviet Prime Minister Andrei Gromyko to deplore, as he did in 1948, in the 299th meeting of the Security Council, the act by Israel’s neighbors of “sending troops into Palestine and carrying out military operations aimed” — in Mr. Gromyko’s words — at the suppression of the national liberation movement in Palestine.” Now it was the singular nature — if, I am not mistaken, it was the unique nature — of this national liberation movement that in contrast with the movements that preceded it, those of that time, and those that have come since, it defined its members in terms not of birth, but of belief. That is to say, it was not a movement of the Irish to free Ireland, or of the Polish to free Poland, not a movement of the Algerians to free Algeria, nor of Indians to free India. It was not a movement of persons connected by historic membership to a genetic pool of the kind that enables us to speak loosely but not meaninglessly, say, of the Chinese people, nor yet of diverse groups occupying the same territory which enables us to speak if the American people with no greater indignity to truth. To the contrary, Zionists defined themselves merely as Jews, and declared to be Jewish anyone born of a Jewish mother or — and this is the absolutely crucial fact — anyone who converted to Judaism. Which is to say, in terms of International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, adopted by the 20th General Assembly, anyone — regardless of “race, colour, descent, or nationally or ethnic origin …..” The state of Israel, which in time was the creation of the Zionist Movement, has been extraordinary in nothing so much as the range of “racial stocks” from which it Orient and Jew from the West. Most such persons could be said to have been “born” Jewish, just as most Presbyterians and most Hindus are “born” to their faith, but there are many Jews who are just converts. With a consistency in the matter which surely attests to the importance of this issue to that religions and political culture, Israeli courts have held that a Jew who converts to another religion is no longer a Jew. In the meantime the population of Israel also includes large numbers of non-Jews, among them Arabs of both the Muslim and Christian religions and Christians of other national origins. Many of these persons are citizens of Israel, and those who are not can become citizens by legal procedures very much like those which obtain in a typical nation of Western Europe. Now I should wish to be understood that I am here making one point, and one point only, which is that whatever else Zionism may be, it is not and cannot be “a form of racism.” In logic, the State of Israel could be, or could become, many things, theoretically, including many things undesirable, but it could not be and could not become racism unless it ceased to be Zionist. Indeed, the idea that Jews are a “race” was invented not by Jews but by those who hated Jews. The idea of Jews as a race was invented by nineteenth century anti-semites such as Houston Steward Chamberlain and Edouard Drumont, who saw that in an increasingly secular age, which is to say an age made for fewer distinctions between people, the old religions grounds for anti-semitism were losing force. New justifications were needed for excluding and persecuting Jews, and so the new idea of Jews as a race — rather than as a religion — was born. It was a contemptible idea at the beginning, and no civilized person would be associated with it. To think that it is an idea now endorsed by the United Nations is to reflect on what civilization has come to. It is precisely a concern for civilization, for civilized values that are or should be precious to all mankind, that arouses us at this moment to such special passion. What we have at stake here is not merely the honor and the legitimacy of the State of Israel — although a challenge to the legitimacy of any member nation ought always to arouse the vigilance of all members of the United Nations. For a yet more important matter is at issue, which is the integrity of the whole body of moral and legal precepts which we know as human rights. The terrible lie that has been told here today will have terrible consequences. Not only will people begin to say, indeed they have already begun to say that the United Nations is a place where lies are told, but far more serious, grave and perhaps irreparable harm will be done to the cause of human rights itself. The harm will arise first because it will strip from racism the precise and abhorrent meaning that it still precariously holds today. How will the people of the world feel about racism and the need to struggle against it, when they are told that it is an idea as broad as to include the Jewish national liberation movement? As the lie spreads, it will do harm in a second way. Many of the members of the United Nations owe their independence in no small part to the notion of human rights, as it has spread from the domestic sphere to the international sphere exercised its influence over the old colonial powers. We are now coming into a time when that independence is likely to be threatened again. There will be new forces, some of them arising now, new prophets and new despots, who will justify their actions with the help of just such distortions of words as we have sanctioned here today. Today we have drained the word “racism” of its meaning. Tomorrow, terms like “national self-determination” and “national honor” will be perverted in the same way to serve the purposes of conquest and exploitation. And when these claims begin to be made — as they already have begun to be made — it is the small nations of the world whose integrity will suffer. And how will the small nations of the world defend themselves, on what grounds will others be moved to defend and protect them, when the language of human rights, the only language by which the small can be defended, is no longer believed and no longer has a power of its own? There is this danger, and then a final danger that is the most serious of all. Which is that the damage we now do to the idea of human rights and the language of human rights could well be irreversible. The idea of human rights as we know it today is not an idea which has always existed in human affairs, it is an idea which appeared at a specific time in the world, and under very special circumstances. It appeared when European philosophers of the seventeenth century began to argue that man was a being whose existence was independent from that of the State, that he need join a political community only if he did not lose by that association more than he gained. From this very specific political philosophy stemmed the idea of political rights, of claims that the individual could justly make against the state; it was because the individual was seen as so separate from the State that he could make legitimate demands upon it. That was the philosophy from which the idea of domestic and international rights sprang. But most of the world does not hold with that philosophy now. Most of the world believes in newer modes of political thought, in philosophies that do not accept the individual as distinct from and prior to the State, in philosophies that therefore do not provide any justification for the idea of human rights and philosophies that have no words by which to explain their value. If we destroy the words that were given to us by past centuries, we will not have words to replace them, for philosophy today has no such words. But there are those of us who have not forsaken these older words, still so new to much of the world. Not forsaken them now, not here, not anywhere, not ever. The United States of America declares that it does not acknowledge, it will not abide by, it will never acquiesce in this infamous act.”

Hillel Neuer

68,720 次观看 • 10 个月前

📣 Dmitry Saksonov: A Message to the Community You've been waiting for this. We've been waiting for this. And today is the day we start showing our hand. 🎬 In this video, Dmitry Saksonov — the founder of our ecosystem — speaks openly for the first time about the journey from 2023 to 2026. About those who believed first. About every single person who became the foundation of what we're building 🙏 ▶ Watch this video. Listen to his words. This isn't just a progress report. It's an honest conversation about why we are destined to succeed. 🌍 But what's next? The world is changing right now. 🇺🇸 The US administration is investing $2 billion into quantum technologies — the largest government investment in the sector to date. 🧠 Quantum is the next frontier after AI. And those who aren't ready for the quantum era will be left behind. ⚠ Neither Bitcoin nor Ethereum are prepared for this. Their cryptography is vulnerable. ⚡ ATOM Quantum ($ATQM) — this is what comes next ⚡ A quantum-resistant reserve asset for the AI era. A financial operating system for the post-quantum age, built on Super-Quantum Ruliadic Oracle technology. 🏔 It's the apex of everything we've built — the layer that unites JGGL, ATLA, IMBA, and TEKI into one unbreakable system. ⚙ The MVP is in its final stages. Our engineers are working 16-hour days 👨‍💻 ✅ Post-quantum signatures ✅ Fast blocks ✅ EVM compatibility All of this is already being tested. 🔐 How to become part of ATOM Quantum? ATOM Quantum can't simply be bought. 🚫 It's not available to those who haven't walked this path with us 🗓 Tomorrow we're launching Atom Quantum Packs. Atom Quantum Packs are your exclusive access to $ATQM. But to unlock the ability to purchase them, you must prove your commitment to the ecosystem 👇 You must hold all four of our core assets: 🪙 JGGL 🔷 ATLA 🎵 IMBA 🎬 TEKI (any amount) 🧩 Only those who've collected all four elements will receive the key to Atom Quantum Packs. 👁 Watch the video. Understand the scale of what we're building. And get ready🚀
18:22

📣 Dmitry Saksonov: A Message to the Community You've been waiting for this. We've been waiting for this. And today is the day we start showing our hand. 🎬 In this video, Dmitry Saksonov — the founder of our ecosystem — speaks openly for the first time about the journey from 2023 to 2026. About those who believed first. About every single person who became the foundation of what we're building 🙏 ▶ Watch this video. Listen to his words. This isn't just a progress report. It's an honest conversation about why we are destined to succeed. 🌍 But what's next? The world is changing right now. 🇺🇸 The US administration is investing $2 billion into quantum technologies — the largest government investment in the sector to date. 🧠 Quantum is the next frontier after AI. And those who aren't ready for the quantum era will be left behind. ⚠ Neither Bitcoin nor Ethereum are prepared for this. Their cryptography is vulnerable. ⚡ ATOM Quantum ($ATQM) — this is what comes next ⚡ A quantum-resistant reserve asset for the AI era. A financial operating system for the post-quantum age, built on Super-Quantum Ruliadic Oracle technology. 🏔 It's the apex of everything we've built — the layer that unites JGGL, ATLA, IMBA, and TEKI into one unbreakable system. ⚙ The MVP is in its final stages. Our engineers are working 16-hour days 👨‍💻 ✅ Post-quantum signatures ✅ Fast blocks ✅ EVM compatibility All of this is already being tested. 🔐 How to become part of ATOM Quantum? ATOM Quantum can't simply be bought. 🚫 It's not available to those who haven't walked this path with us 🗓 Tomorrow we're launching Atom Quantum Packs. Atom Quantum Packs are your exclusive access to $ATQM. But to unlock the ability to purchase them, you must prove your commitment to the ecosystem 👇 You must hold all four of our core assets: 🪙 JGGL 🔷 ATLA 🎵 IMBA 🎬 TEKI (any amount) 🧩 Only those who've collected all four elements will receive the key to Atom Quantum Packs. 👁 Watch the video. Understand the scale of what we're building. And get ready🚀

Atleta Network

26,546 次观看 • 3 个月前

Using Claude Fable 5, I built a model that predicts the entire 2026 FIFA world cup.. every single game, not just the final.. so let me break the whole thing down. what it does, how it works, and exactly how i built it.. #1 First what it does: it predicts all 104 games of the tournament. not just who lifts the trophy, but every group match, every knockout, the full path from the round of 32 to the final.. everything lands in one dashboard: > group stage, every match with each team's win % and the chance of a draw > standings, how all 12 groups are projected to finish > bracket, the full knockout tree with each team's odds of advancing > champion odds, who's most likely to actually win it all and it doesn't freeze after one prediction. the moment a real game is played, it locks that result in and re-runs everything around it. so the odds move live as the tournament goes, week by week you watch favorites rise and contenders collapse. #2. How it works: the core idea is simple. the model only ever predicts one thing, a single match. the real trick is the repetition. it learns from decades of match history, then plays the whole tournament out from the first game to the final, tens of thousands of times. each run it records who advanced and who won. do that enough and you stop getting one guess and start getting real odds, one team lifts the trophy in maybe 14% of the runs, another in 9%, and so on. #3. So, how i built it ? i didn't hand-write most of the code. i broke the project into 4 pieces, described each one to fable, and let it build while i focused on getting the football logic exactly right. - The data every international match going back over a century, around 50,000 games, plus each team's elo rating, which is the truest measure of strength, and the official 2026 schedule. garbage data means garbage predictions, so this part mattered most. - The features i turned that raw history into signals the model can learn from, the elo gap between the two teams, recent form, goals scored and conceded, and a home boost for the hosts, usa, canada and mexico. - The model for each match it predicts the expected goals for both sides, then turns that into win, draw and loss probabilities plus a likely scoreline. that's what feeds the simulation. - The tournament engine this was the hard part. the 2026 world cup is brand new, 48 teams, 12 groups, a round of 32 that's never existed before, and 8 "best third-placed" teams that slot into the bracket by a fixed fifa table. even the group tiebreakers changed this year, head to head now counts before goal difference. get any of it wrong and the whole bracket falls apart, so i built it carefully and tested the format until it was exact, then wrapped it in a simulation loop that plays the tournament out tens of thousands of times. and the last piece, the live part. as real results come in, they get locked, and only the unplayed games get re-simulated. that's what makes it a living model instead of a one-time prediction. all of it outputs to a clean dashboard you can actually read and screenshot.. right now, before kickoff, it already has a clear favorite to lift the trophy.. 👀 btw who's your pick to win the 2026 world cup?
0:20

Using Claude Fable 5, I built a model that predicts the entire 2026 FIFA world cup.. every single game, not just the final.. so let me break the whole thing down. what it does, how it works, and exactly how i built it.. #1 First what it does: it predicts all 104 games of the tournament. not just who lifts the trophy, but every group match, every knockout, the full path from the round of 32 to the final.. everything lands in one dashboard: > group stage, every match with each team's win % and the chance of a draw > standings, how all 12 groups are projected to finish > bracket, the full knockout tree with each team's odds of advancing > champion odds, who's most likely to actually win it all and it doesn't freeze after one prediction. the moment a real game is played, it locks that result in and re-runs everything around it. so the odds move live as the tournament goes, week by week you watch favorites rise and contenders collapse. #2. How it works: the core idea is simple. the model only ever predicts one thing, a single match. the real trick is the repetition. it learns from decades of match history, then plays the whole tournament out from the first game to the final, tens of thousands of times. each run it records who advanced and who won. do that enough and you stop getting one guess and start getting real odds, one team lifts the trophy in maybe 14% of the runs, another in 9%, and so on. #3. So, how i built it ? i didn't hand-write most of the code. i broke the project into 4 pieces, described each one to fable, and let it build while i focused on getting the football logic exactly right. - The data every international match going back over a century, around 50,000 games, plus each team's elo rating, which is the truest measure of strength, and the official 2026 schedule. garbage data means garbage predictions, so this part mattered most. - The features i turned that raw history into signals the model can learn from, the elo gap between the two teams, recent form, goals scored and conceded, and a home boost for the hosts, usa, canada and mexico. - The model for each match it predicts the expected goals for both sides, then turns that into win, draw and loss probabilities plus a likely scoreline. that's what feeds the simulation. - The tournament engine this was the hard part. the 2026 world cup is brand new, 48 teams, 12 groups, a round of 32 that's never existed before, and 8 "best third-placed" teams that slot into the bracket by a fixed fifa table. even the group tiebreakers changed this year, head to head now counts before goal difference. get any of it wrong and the whole bracket falls apart, so i built it carefully and tested the format until it was exact, then wrapped it in a simulation loop that plays the tournament out tens of thousands of times. and the last piece, the live part. as real results come in, they get locked, and only the unplayed games get re-simulated. that's what makes it a living model instead of a one-time prediction. all of it outputs to a clean dashboard you can actually read and screenshot.. right now, before kickoff, it already has a clear favorite to lift the trophy.. 👀 btw who's your pick to win the 2026 world cup?

Axel Bitblaze 🪓

63,666 次观看 • 2 个月前

This is what is so missing today in the body of Christ. Even so called mentors are jealous of their mentees. True Christianity is being genuinely happy for your brother and sister when they succeed. Most of the anger against private jets is simply pure jealousy. Because you did not buy a private jet does not mean you should hate those who did. The Archbishop was a mentor and the first Pentecostal to start building a university at a time when Bishop David Oyedepo had not yet conceived building one. He did not get angry that his son chose a private jet instead of a university. He even insisted on driving to the venue instead of asking that they send him a plane. Such a level of humility is missing today in the body of Christ. Most times, it is simply hatred toward the decisions of others. Our differences should unite us and not divide us. The same Bishop David Oyedepo paid the university bills for years after the Archbishop passed on. Today, the Bishop has two universities and ten more in plan. The connection between bishop david Oyedepo and archbishop Idahosa , now I see why It lasted even after he passed on. Finally, let us invest in mentorship early. You have no idea how those you invest in today will tomorrow be instrumental in helping you. On my 40th birthday, what humbled me the most were the mentees God has helped me touch and impact in their lives. Let us prioritize what truly matters. Those you raise today will be instrumental in your sustained reign tomorrow. God bless us all. Dr. Stephen Akintayo
3:06

This is what is so missing today in the body of Christ. Even so called mentors are jealous of their mentees. True Christianity is being genuinely happy for your brother and sister when they succeed. Most of the anger against private jets is simply pure jealousy. Because you did not buy a private jet does not mean you should hate those who did. The Archbishop was a mentor and the first Pentecostal to start building a university at a time when Bishop David Oyedepo had not yet conceived building one. He did not get angry that his son chose a private jet instead of a university. He even insisted on driving to the venue instead of asking that they send him a plane. Such a level of humility is missing today in the body of Christ. Most times, it is simply hatred toward the decisions of others. Our differences should unite us and not divide us. The same Bishop David Oyedepo paid the university bills for years after the Archbishop passed on. Today, the Bishop has two universities and ten more in plan. The connection between bishop david Oyedepo and archbishop Idahosa , now I see why It lasted even after he passed on. Finally, let us invest in mentorship early. You have no idea how those you invest in today will tomorrow be instrumental in helping you. On my 40th birthday, what humbled me the most were the mentees God has helped me touch and impact in their lives. Let us prioritize what truly matters. Those you raise today will be instrumental in your sustained reign tomorrow. God bless us all. Dr. Stephen Akintayo

Dr Stephen Akintayo

19,915 次观看 • 6 个月前

📖THE SEEDANCE 2.0 PROMPT FORMAT THAT NOBODY IS USING BUT EVERYONE SHOULD Most people use Seedance 2.0 wrong. They type a normal prompt and wonder why the result looks generic. The difference between these two visuals isn't a better idea — it's a better prompt format. Normal prompt gives you a good result. JSON prompt gives you a cinematic one. Here's why it works: A normal prompt describes what you want. A JSON prompt tells Seedance exactly how to build the scene — camera movement, lighting angle, atmosphere, texture, depth, timing. You're not asking for a video. You're engineering one. The crystal dolphin jumping above an ancient courtyard with floating jellyfish — same concept, two completely different outputs. The JSON version has golden hour, dramatic clouds, volumetric light, and a sense of scale the normal prompt never reached. The glowing lotus fountain — same story. Normal prompt gives you a clean render. JSON gives you a full cinematic frame with layered depth, warm lantern light, and a composition that looks like it belongs in a feature film. The workflow that produces this: • Step 1 — Write your scene idea in plain language first •Step 2 — Ask Claude to convert it into a structured JSON prompt with fields for: subject, environment, camera, lighting, mood, motion, color grade • Step 3 — Paste the JSON into Seedance 2.0 • Step 4 — Take the best clip into Premiere Pro for final color correction and sound design The tools are free or cheap. The knowledge of how to prompt is what separates the results. This is the gap most creators never close. 📥 BACK TOMORROW. There will be new life hacks 🔖 The full guide is pinned below. Save it before you need it.
0:35

📖THE SEEDANCE 2.0 PROMPT FORMAT THAT NOBODY IS USING BUT EVERYONE SHOULD Most people use Seedance 2.0 wrong. They type a normal prompt and wonder why the result looks generic. The difference between these two visuals isn't a better idea — it's a better prompt format. Normal prompt gives you a good result. JSON prompt gives you a cinematic one. Here's why it works: A normal prompt describes what you want. A JSON prompt tells Seedance exactly how to build the scene — camera movement, lighting angle, atmosphere, texture, depth, timing. You're not asking for a video. You're engineering one. The crystal dolphin jumping above an ancient courtyard with floating jellyfish — same concept, two completely different outputs. The JSON version has golden hour, dramatic clouds, volumetric light, and a sense of scale the normal prompt never reached. The glowing lotus fountain — same story. Normal prompt gives you a clean render. JSON gives you a full cinematic frame with layered depth, warm lantern light, and a composition that looks like it belongs in a feature film. The workflow that produces this: • Step 1 — Write your scene idea in plain language first •Step 2 — Ask Claude to convert it into a structured JSON prompt with fields for: subject, environment, camera, lighting, mood, motion, color grade • Step 3 — Paste the JSON into Seedance 2.0 • Step 4 — Take the best clip into Premiere Pro for final color correction and sound design The tools are free or cheap. The knowledge of how to prompt is what separates the results. This is the gap most creators never close. 📥 BACK TOMORROW. There will be new life hacks 🔖 The full guide is pinned below. Save it before you need it.

Zentrix⌚️

136,558 次观看 • 2 个月前

‼️Tyler Bowyer ADMITS Charlie Believed 'Hate Speech' Is PROTECTED Speech—Meanwhile Turning Point 2.0 Is Violating Charlie Kirk’s FINAL Dying Beliefs! 👀 While the "new" leadership tries to weaponize Charlie’s memory to cancel and sue his friends, Tyler Bowyer just accidentally admitted the truth: Turning Point 2.0 is violating the very principles Charlie Kirk lived and died for. In this clip, Tyler Bowyer—one of Charlie’s closest allies—is asked how Charlie would react to the current impulse to cancel, silence, or sue people speaking critically of him in the wake of his assassination. The answer is devastating for the people currently running the show: Charlie would be 100% against it. "He would reject it." —Tyler Bowyer Tyler reveals that just one week before his murder, Charlie was adamant that "bad speech, hate speech, and negative speech" are all protected under the First Amendment. He rejected the "cancel culture" impulse entirely. Despite Charlie’s clear stance, the leadership at Turning Point 2.0 (and their allies at the Daily Wire) are doing the exact opposite. They are currently engaged in a massive "lawfare" campaign—suing and attempting to bankrupt Candace Owens, independent researchers, and anyone else who dares to "notice" the inconsistencies in the official narrative. They are using Charlie’s death to justify the very censorship he fought against his entire career. They claim to be "protecting his legacy" while they dismantle his core belief in the right to associate and speak freely. Notice how the interviewer tries to pivot to "firing people" being part of free speech. This is the exact excuse the Daily Wire used to fire Candace and the same logic being used to justify the legal hit jobs against us. They call it the "right to associate," but we call it what it is: The targeted destruction of dissent. Charlie Kirk built a movement on the idea that we don't silence our opponents—we out-argue them. Turning Point 2.0 has abandoned that for the weaponization of the courtroom and advocating of hate speech laws. The king is gone, and the guards are now burning his books. RT if you want the REAL Charlie Kirk legacy protected, not the corporate version. 👇
1:41

‼️Tyler Bowyer ADMITS Charlie Believed 'Hate Speech' Is PROTECTED Speech—Meanwhile Turning Point 2.0 Is Violating Charlie Kirk’s FINAL Dying Beliefs! 👀 While the "new" leadership tries to weaponize Charlie’s memory to cancel and sue his friends, Tyler Bowyer just accidentally admitted the truth: Turning Point 2.0 is violating the very principles Charlie Kirk lived and died for. In this clip, Tyler Bowyer—one of Charlie’s closest allies—is asked how Charlie would react to the current impulse to cancel, silence, or sue people speaking critically of him in the wake of his assassination. The answer is devastating for the people currently running the show: Charlie would be 100% against it. "He would reject it." —Tyler Bowyer Tyler reveals that just one week before his murder, Charlie was adamant that "bad speech, hate speech, and negative speech" are all protected under the First Amendment. He rejected the "cancel culture" impulse entirely. Despite Charlie’s clear stance, the leadership at Turning Point 2.0 (and their allies at the Daily Wire) are doing the exact opposite. They are currently engaged in a massive "lawfare" campaign—suing and attempting to bankrupt Candace Owens, independent researchers, and anyone else who dares to "notice" the inconsistencies in the official narrative. They are using Charlie’s death to justify the very censorship he fought against his entire career. They claim to be "protecting his legacy" while they dismantle his core belief in the right to associate and speak freely. Notice how the interviewer tries to pivot to "firing people" being part of free speech. This is the exact excuse the Daily Wire used to fire Candace and the same logic being used to justify the legal hit jobs against us. They call it the "right to associate," but we call it what it is: The targeted destruction of dissent. Charlie Kirk built a movement on the idea that we don't silence our opponents—we out-argue them. Turning Point 2.0 has abandoned that for the weaponization of the courtroom and advocating of hate speech laws. The king is gone, and the guards are now burning his books. RT if you want the REAL Charlie Kirk legacy protected, not the corporate version. 👇

Project Constitution

18,825 次观看 • 3 个月前

Not every memorable moment in cinema wins over audiences through cinematography, choreography, or music alone. Some moments endure because they touch something deeply rooted in human nature. Gene Kelly singing and dancing in the rain in Singin’ in the Rain (1952) is one such moment. At first glance, it is simply the image of a joyful man walking through the rain. He sings, spins his umbrella, steps through puddles, swings around a lamppost, and smiles in the middle of an empty street. But what allows this scene to remain in the memory of audiences is not only its visual beauty. Beneath the surface, it reflects a very special state of human existence: the moment when inner joy and outward expression become one unified whole. Perhaps this is the deepest source of beauty within this scene. From a Dance Scene to the Unity Between Inner Emotion and Outer Form What the audience first feels is a very simple sense of joy. Don Lockwood has just experienced a moment of happiness with Kathy. The emotion is so powerful that when he steps outside into the rain, he no longer sees the weather as an obstacle. He sings. He dances. He plays with the falling drops of water. The rain, which could normally be uncomfortable, becomes part of his happiness. But if we stop here, we are only seeing the surface of the scene. The deeper meaning lies in the way all elements come together in harmony. The music does not exist separately from the movement. The rhythm of the song becomes the rhythm of the body. Every step, every turn, every movement of the umbrella seems to come directly from the emotion within. The rain is no longer merely a background. The street is no longer just a setting. The entire world around him becomes part of his inner state. This reflects an idea often emphasized in Western aesthetics: beauty emerges when different elements achieve an organic unity. The outer form is no longer separated from the inner meaning. The Smallest Moment Can Contain the Greatest Spirit The entire scene can be condensed into one very small action: Gene Kelly steps into a puddle. This is not simply a humorous gesture. It is a symbol of the way human beings perceive the world. An ordinary person might avoid a puddle out of concern for dirty shoes, wet clothes, or losing a sense of neatness and control. But Don Lockwood deliberately steps into it. He transforms something that would normally be avoided into a source of happiness. In that moment, he is no longer controlled by hesitation or excessive awareness of himself. He is not trying to create the image of a happy person. He is simply living within that happiness. This is what makes the scene so special. The audience feels that they are not watching a performance about joy, but witnessing joy itself finding its own natural form of expression. Why Does This Touch the Human Heart? The deeper question is: Why does the unity between inner feeling and outer expression move us? Perhaps because, in everyday life, human beings often experience separation. We may think one thing but say another. We may feel something but have to hide it. We may want to act naturally but become limited by layers of worry and calculation. Yet sometimes, we encounter a moment when all those distances disappear. A child’s natural laughter is an example that closely reflects the spirit of Gene Kelly’s performance. When a child is truly happy, that happiness does not remain only within the mind. It appears through the whole person: The eyes brighten. The expression changes. The voice becomes clear and pure. The body moves together with the emotion. A child does not need to learn how to express happiness. Happiness naturally finds its way outward. This is exactly what Gene Kelly evokes in the rain. Although Don Lockwood is an adult, in that moment he returns to a very fundamental human state: when the soul and the body are no longer separated, when genuine emotion can freely express itself through every movement. This Principle Exists in Nature What is interesting is that this principle does not exist only in art. A similar pattern can be found in the natural world. A seed grows into a tree. The shape of the tree is not something added from the outside, but the expression of an inner process of life. A flower blooms not because it tries to become beautiful, but because the life within it has reached a form that naturally expresses itself. A river does not create beauty by resisting the landscape. It flows around rocks, adapts to the shape of the earth, and through this harmony creates its own unique form. The same is true within the human body. A genuine smile is not only found in the movement of the lips. It is the coordination of the eyes, facial expression, voice, and inner emotional state. A highly skilled athlete or artist often creates a similar impression: technique is no longer separated from emotion. The body becomes a natural instrument for expressing an idea from within. The Scene and the Beauty of Wholeness From an aesthetic perspective, what makes Singin’ in the Rain special is not simply that Gene Kelly dances beautifully. More importantly, the scene reveals a profound image of humanity: A person who is no longer divided between emotion and action. A person whose inner world and outer expression move toward the same direction. A person who encounters the world not as an obstacle, but as a part of life unfolding naturally. This is also why the scene continues to connect with generations of viewers. Regardless of the era, people can still recognize the beauty of a familiar state of being: the moment when a living being is able to exist in harmony with its own nature.
4:16

Not every memorable moment in cinema wins over audiences through cinematography, choreography, or music alone. Some moments endure because they touch something deeply rooted in human nature. Gene Kelly singing and dancing in the rain in Singin’ in the Rain (1952) is one such moment. At first glance, it is simply the image of a joyful man walking through the rain. He sings, spins his umbrella, steps through puddles, swings around a lamppost, and smiles in the middle of an empty street. But what allows this scene to remain in the memory of audiences is not only its visual beauty. Beneath the surface, it reflects a very special state of human existence: the moment when inner joy and outward expression become one unified whole. Perhaps this is the deepest source of beauty within this scene. From a Dance Scene to the Unity Between Inner Emotion and Outer Form What the audience first feels is a very simple sense of joy. Don Lockwood has just experienced a moment of happiness with Kathy. The emotion is so powerful that when he steps outside into the rain, he no longer sees the weather as an obstacle. He sings. He dances. He plays with the falling drops of water. The rain, which could normally be uncomfortable, becomes part of his happiness. But if we stop here, we are only seeing the surface of the scene. The deeper meaning lies in the way all elements come together in harmony. The music does not exist separately from the movement. The rhythm of the song becomes the rhythm of the body. Every step, every turn, every movement of the umbrella seems to come directly from the emotion within. The rain is no longer merely a background. The street is no longer just a setting. The entire world around him becomes part of his inner state. This reflects an idea often emphasized in Western aesthetics: beauty emerges when different elements achieve an organic unity. The outer form is no longer separated from the inner meaning. The Smallest Moment Can Contain the Greatest Spirit The entire scene can be condensed into one very small action: Gene Kelly steps into a puddle. This is not simply a humorous gesture. It is a symbol of the way human beings perceive the world. An ordinary person might avoid a puddle out of concern for dirty shoes, wet clothes, or losing a sense of neatness and control. But Don Lockwood deliberately steps into it. He transforms something that would normally be avoided into a source of happiness. In that moment, he is no longer controlled by hesitation or excessive awareness of himself. He is not trying to create the image of a happy person. He is simply living within that happiness. This is what makes the scene so special. The audience feels that they are not watching a performance about joy, but witnessing joy itself finding its own natural form of expression. Why Does This Touch the Human Heart? The deeper question is: Why does the unity between inner feeling and outer expression move us? Perhaps because, in everyday life, human beings often experience separation. We may think one thing but say another. We may feel something but have to hide it. We may want to act naturally but become limited by layers of worry and calculation. Yet sometimes, we encounter a moment when all those distances disappear. A child’s natural laughter is an example that closely reflects the spirit of Gene Kelly’s performance. When a child is truly happy, that happiness does not remain only within the mind. It appears through the whole person: The eyes brighten. The expression changes. The voice becomes clear and pure. The body moves together with the emotion. A child does not need to learn how to express happiness. Happiness naturally finds its way outward. This is exactly what Gene Kelly evokes in the rain. Although Don Lockwood is an adult, in that moment he returns to a very fundamental human state: when the soul and the body are no longer separated, when genuine emotion can freely express itself through every movement. This Principle Exists in Nature What is interesting is that this principle does not exist only in art. A similar pattern can be found in the natural world. A seed grows into a tree. The shape of the tree is not something added from the outside, but the expression of an inner process of life. A flower blooms not because it tries to become beautiful, but because the life within it has reached a form that naturally expresses itself. A river does not create beauty by resisting the landscape. It flows around rocks, adapts to the shape of the earth, and through this harmony creates its own unique form. The same is true within the human body. A genuine smile is not only found in the movement of the lips. It is the coordination of the eyes, facial expression, voice, and inner emotional state. A highly skilled athlete or artist often creates a similar impression: technique is no longer separated from emotion. The body becomes a natural instrument for expressing an idea from within. The Scene and the Beauty of Wholeness From an aesthetic perspective, what makes Singin’ in the Rain special is not simply that Gene Kelly dances beautifully. More importantly, the scene reveals a profound image of humanity: A person who is no longer divided between emotion and action. A person whose inner world and outer expression move toward the same direction. A person who encounters the world not as an obstacle, but as a part of life unfolding naturally. This is also why the scene continues to connect with generations of viewers. Regardless of the era, people can still recognize the beauty of a familiar state of being: the moment when a living being is able to exist in harmony with its own nature.

🎼🌺Music Love♥️

17,408 次观看 • 1 个月前