Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Fun with chains 101: 🤓 First: buy chains and locks Second: buy much more chains Third: wonder why you haven't enough locks Fourth: realize that locks are actually too expensive (still get more)😅 Fifth: find a friend who likes that s#!t too Sixth: enjoy it 😏🤤😈

Egnur Tiger🔗⛓️🔑🔞

4,332 subscribers

17,472 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

5 条评论

- ̗̀ Zeekra ̖́- 的头像

- ̗̀ Zeekra ̖́-1 年前

fünftens ist wohl am schwersten 🥺

⛓️Rep, Kinkiest Werewolf⛓️ 的头像

⛓️Rep, Kinkiest Werewolf⛓️1 年前

I tend to think locks and chains are pretty neat 😊

Fenick Fox 的头像

Fenick Fox1 年前

Imagine going into a hotel and finding lock out of nowhere and not realizing you just found the equivalent to a condom. 🤣 No no.. it's not a TSA lock...

Chrisey 🐰/Cittey 🐹🐰/🏳️‍🌈 的头像

Chrisey 🐰/Cittey 🐹🐰/🏳️‍🌈1 年前

Das muss ein Traum sein...

Fox Dublith VA 的头像

Fox Dublith VA1 年前

Pretty sexy, would love to try it

相关视频

“Failure is so much more interesting than success. And it always saddens me that school doesn't teach that. At school the thing is to be brilliant and to get the answer right first time. And there are brilliant people who could do that, but for the rest of us who are not brilliant, we have to strive, and we have to go through failure. And we realize that you don't get it right the first time or the second time. In my case and I counted it. It took 5,127 times. With failure you question it “Well why did it go wrong?” And actually the reason it goes wrong is often very, very interesting. Where something works you say “Great that worked.” You don't even stop to wonder why it works. So if you've got to enjoy failure.” —James Dyson

“Failure is so much more interesting than success. And it always saddens me that school doesn't teach that. At school the thing is to be brilliant and to get the answer right first time. And there are brilliant people who could do that, but for the rest of us who are not brilliant, we have to strive, and we have to go through failure. And we realize that you don't get it right the first time or the second time. In my case and I counted it. It took 5,127 times. With failure you question it “Well why did it go wrong?” And actually the reason it goes wrong is often very, very interesting. Where something works you say “Great that worked.” You don't even stop to wonder why it works. So if you've got to enjoy failure.” —James Dyson

David Senra

55,559 次观看 • 1 个月前

#JanjingjingXTaixiaoxiang 🎤: (5 reasons why you think the other person likes you) 🦊: i think jingjing likes me because i am, first, funny! 🎤: is it true that she’s funny? 🐯: that’s true! 🦊: second, my good personality 🐯: (🤔) 🦊: is that true? 🎤: why are you making this face? 🦊: is that true? 🐯: that’s true! wait p’jan is laughing so loud 🦊: it’s like she’s forced to answer. i’m someone who’s dedicated to work 🎤: is that right? 🐯: right! 🦊: fourth, i’m someone who talks nonsense 🐯: 🤦🏻‍♀️ 🎤: like 煮蛋, right? (asked about their heights) how about the fifth reason? 🦊: i have passion 🦊🐯:😏 🎤: why do you think she likes you? 🐯: the first reason is that i’m silly 🎤: is that right? 🦊: she’s silly 🐯: second, it would probably because i’m kind. the third is… 🦊: 👍🏻 that’s right 🐯: third, because i’m dedicated to work too 🎤: both of you are dedicated to work 🐯: fourth, i have passion too 🎤: no wonder the two of you are together, having the same styles 🐯: another reason… 🎤: another reason, right? oh we are not done praising! 🦊: she wants to praise me~ 🐯: no! my body [figure] is great~ 🦊: (…) 🎤: is that right? 🐯: 👀. p’jan, reply properly! 🦊: that’s right! 🎤: what’s her body figure like? 🦊: s line 🐯: her face is red!!

#JanjingjingXTaixiaoxiang 🎤: (5 reasons why you think the other person likes you) 🦊: i think jingjing likes me because i am, first, funny! 🎤: is it true that she’s funny? 🐯: that’s true! 🦊: second, my good personality 🐯: (🤔) 🦊: is that true? 🎤: why are you making this face? 🦊: is that true? 🐯: that’s true! wait p’jan is laughing so loud 🦊: it’s like she’s forced to answer. i’m someone who’s dedicated to work 🎤: is that right? 🐯: right! 🦊: fourth, i’m someone who talks nonsense 🐯: 🤦🏻‍♀️ 🎤: like 煮蛋, right? (asked about their heights) how about the fifth reason? 🦊: i have passion 🦊🐯:😏 🎤: why do you think she likes you? 🐯: the first reason is that i’m silly 🎤: is that right? 🦊: she’s silly 🐯: second, it would probably because i’m kind. the third is… 🦊: 👍🏻 that’s right 🐯: third, because i’m dedicated to work too 🎤: both of you are dedicated to work 🐯: fourth, i have passion too 🎤: no wonder the two of you are together, having the same styles 🐯: another reason… 🎤: another reason, right? oh we are not done praising! 🦊: she wants to praise me~ 🐯: no! my body [figure] is great~ 🦊: (…) 🎤: is that right? 🐯: 👀. p’jan, reply properly! 🦊: that’s right! 🎤: what’s her body figure like? 🦊: s line 🐯: her face is red!!

²²

59,417 次观看 • 15 天前

Will Smith explains why money can't make you happy “The first half of my life was gather, gather, gather and the second half of my life is going to be give, give, give” “Once you've bought everything you want and there's literally nothing on Earth else that you want to buy, I just wish that was a gift that everybody could have because there's nothing that material can do to satisfy you” “It's like drinking salt water. You'll never get enough. You're just going to make yourself more and more thirsty. You realize that no relationship, no money, no kids, there's literally nothing that can make you happy” “You got to make happy in here. You got to take happy to the people you love. You can't try to get it from them”

Will Smith explains why money can't make you happy “The first half of my life was gather, gather, gather and the second half of my life is going to be give, give, give” “Once you've bought everything you want and there's literally nothing on Earth else that you want to buy, I just wish that was a gift that everybody could have because there's nothing that material can do to satisfy you” “It's like drinking salt water. You'll never get enough. You're just going to make yourself more and more thirsty. You realize that no relationship, no money, no kids, there's literally nothing that can make you happy” “You got to make happy in here. You got to take happy to the people you love. You can't try to get it from them”

Jack

360,601 次观看 • 1 个月前

I Actually Want the Crypto Market to Crash, Here’s Why Everyone is praying for crypto to pump. I'm hoping for the exact opposite, and here's why. People are waiting for the CLARITY Act to pass and the Fed to cut rates so crypto explodes. I want it delayed. Keep the market down a little longer. Here's why that sounds crazy but isn't. When the market is down is exactly when you get to accumulate at cheap prices. You don't walk into a store hoping the price is high. If you want a quality product, you want it cheap. Assets are no different. But in investing people flip it. They want their bags expensive while they're still trying to buy more. That's trading with your emotions, way too attached to your portfolio. If you truly believed in your investments, you'd want what I want: more money into cheaper assets. That's how this actually works, not the other way around. Flip your perspective and you make money. Stay emotional, blame everyone else, and you stay exactly where you are. Follow for more.

I Actually Want the Crypto Market to Crash, Here’s Why Everyone is praying for crypto to pump. I'm hoping for the exact opposite, and here's why. People are waiting for the CLARITY Act to pass and the Fed to cut rates so crypto explodes. I want it delayed. Keep the market down a little longer. Here's why that sounds crazy but isn't. When the market is down is exactly when you get to accumulate at cheap prices. You don't walk into a store hoping the price is high. If you want a quality product, you want it cheap. Assets are no different. But in investing people flip it. They want their bags expensive while they're still trying to buy more. That's trading with your emotions, way too attached to your portfolio. If you truly believed in your investments, you'd want what I want: more money into cheaper assets. That's how this actually works, not the other way around. Flip your perspective and you make money. Stay emotional, blame everyone else, and you stay exactly where you are. Follow for more.

Alexander Lorenzo

13,246 次观看 • 1 个月前

Megyn Kelly dropped a 30-second sociopath test on Andrew Schulz that actually works. A man shows up at a funeral, locks eyes with a woman by the casket… then a week later he kills her mother. Why? Normal brains twist for a minute trying to solve it. Sociopaths? They answer instantly: “So he could see her again.” No hesitation. No moral friction. Just the fastest path. One in four people supposedly tick that box. Andrew breathing a sigh of relief after getting it wrong was pure gold. This isn’t just a party trick, it’s a wild window into how differently some minds are wired. Makes you wonder who you’ve sat next to that sees the world like this. What was your first guess?

Megyn Kelly dropped a 30-second sociopath test on Andrew Schulz that actually works. A man shows up at a funeral, locks eyes with a woman by the casket… then a week later he kills her mother. Why? Normal brains twist for a minute trying to solve it. Sociopaths? They answer instantly: “So he could see her again.” No hesitation. No moral friction. Just the fastest path. One in four people supposedly tick that box. Andrew breathing a sigh of relief after getting it wrong was pure gold. This isn’t just a party trick, it’s a wild window into how differently some minds are wired. Makes you wonder who you’ve sat next to that sees the world like this. What was your first guess?

Camus

1,782,215 次观看 • 1 个月前

Will Smith says his Google-listed $350,000,000 net worth means nothing because he has bought everything he ever wanted and it still could not make him happy Speedy: “A quick Google search says that your net worth is $350,000,000, is that actually accurate?” “Will Smith: I don't even know, man. I don't, I don't discuss such things.” “What what happens is you just realize none of it can make you happy. And you know, once you've bought everything you want and there's literally nothing on Earth else that you want to buy, you know, I just wish that was a gift that everybody could have.” “Because there's nothing that material can do to satisfy you. It's like drinking salt water, you'll just never get enough, you're just going to make yourself more and more thirsty.” “That can actually be scary when you realize that no relationship, that no money, that no kids, like there's literally nothing that can make you happy. That happy is an internal, full frontal contact with your Dark Night of the Soul.”

Will Smith says his Google-listed $350,000,000 net worth means nothing because he has bought everything he ever wanted and it still could not make him happy Speedy: “A quick Google search says that your net worth is $350,000,000, is that actually accurate?” “Will Smith: I don't even know, man. I don't, I don't discuss such things.” “What what happens is you just realize none of it can make you happy. And you know, once you've bought everything you want and there's literally nothing on Earth else that you want to buy, you know, I just wish that was a gift that everybody could have.” “Because there's nothing that material can do to satisfy you. It's like drinking salt water, you'll just never get enough, you're just going to make yourself more and more thirsty.” “That can actually be scary when you realize that no relationship, that no money, that no kids, like there's literally nothing that can make you happy. That happy is an internal, full frontal contact with your Dark Night of the Soul.”

Hribi

3,413,912 次观看 • 25 天前

my boys🥹🤍 🦒: I mentioned this during today’s stage too, in case you didn’t see it… just to tell our weverse coers… actually we are people who do this job in order to perform on stage. All 5 of us love the stage so much, that’s why we’re doing this (job). So if we can’t see your cheers, your shouts, and you guys enjoying it, we honestly feel a little sad. That’s why we’ll work hard so we can show you even more fun stages in the future, and I’d really appreciate it if you all continue to have fun and enjoy it with us in the future too

my boys🥹🤍 🦒: I mentioned this during today’s stage too, in case you didn’t see it… just to tell our weverse coers… actually we are people who do this job in order to perform on stage. All 5 of us love the stage so much, that’s why we’re doing this (job). So if we can’t see your cheers, your shouts, and you guys enjoying it, we honestly feel a little sad. That’s why we’ll work hard so we can show you even more fun stages in the future, and I’d really appreciate it if you all continue to have fun and enjoy it with us in the future too

cip✮

78,161 次观看 • 5 天前

"there's too many f**king bridges, i just wanna move shit from chain A to B" me too yo 🫂 that's why i made: just type the chains you need, and you'll get ALL the bridges that support that route the best part? i didn't write a single line of code. made this ALL in AI in < 24 hours using: - claude (design) - v0 + replit (frontend) - airtable + zapier (backend) - cursor (integration) wanted to push the boundaries on what can be made only using AI, and i haven't even scratched the surface lmk if you want me to go through my complete workflow, will be making even more stuff in the coming weeks 🫡

"there's too many f**king bridges, i just wanna move shit from chain A to B" me too yo 🫂 that's why i made: just type the chains you need, and you'll get ALL the bridges that support that route the best part? i didn't write a single line of code. made this ALL in AI in < 24 hours using: - claude (design) - v0 + replit (frontend) - airtable + zapier (backend) - cursor (integration) wanted to push the boundaries on what can be made only using AI, and i haven't even scratched the surface lmk if you want me to go through my complete workflow, will be making even more stuff in the coming weeks 🫡

Jim

64,548 次观看 • 1 年前

Cross-Chain Arbitrage on Uniswap V4 (opportunities available) I’ve always been curious: how much do prices actually differ between the “same” Uniswap V4 pool deployed across different chains? Think ETH/USDC on Ethereum vs on Unichain, Arbitrum, or Base . They’re technically the same trading pair, but entirely separate pools, with different liquidity, fees, and most importantly, prices. So I built a dashboard to monitor exactly that. It tracks real-time price discrepancies across Uniswap V4 pools on different chains. Why? I was curious. I wanted to understand: - How often do mispricings occur? - How big are those discrepancies? - And perhaps most interestingly: how fast are they arbitraged away? On the same chain, arbitrage between DEXs is well understood. You can create a smart contract that executes a set of swaps atomically, either guaranteeing profit or reverting the transaction. But cross-chain? That’s a different game. Different chains mean different execution environments, timing issues, and gas fee structures. It’s harder to coordinate. It’s also harder to monitor... What I’ve Built (So Far) Right now, the dashboard monitors the ETH/USDC pair across four chains in real time. You can visually see: - Realtime ETH price on each chain - Size of most recent trades indicated by bubble size - Max current spread available. I've only finished it this afternoon and after watching it for 15min I've already spotted a few times where the mispricings are significant. I want to add more pairs and chains soon (super easy actually) - just don't want to clutter it before getting more feedback and ideas. I’ve dropped the link to the dashboard in the comments below. If you’ve built a cross-chain arb bot, I’d love to hear how you approached it!

Cross-Chain Arbitrage on Uniswap V4 (opportunities available) I’ve always been curious: how much do prices actually differ between the “same” Uniswap V4 pool deployed across different chains? Think ETH/USDC on Ethereum vs on Unichain, Arbitrum, or Base . They’re technically the same trading pair, but entirely separate pools, with different liquidity, fees, and most importantly, prices. So I built a dashboard to monitor exactly that. It tracks real-time price discrepancies across Uniswap V4 pools on different chains. Why? I was curious. I wanted to understand: - How often do mispricings occur? - How big are those discrepancies? - And perhaps most interestingly: how fast are they arbitraged away? On the same chain, arbitrage between DEXs is well understood. You can create a smart contract that executes a set of swaps atomically, either guaranteeing profit or reverting the transaction. But cross-chain? That’s a different game. Different chains mean different execution environments, timing issues, and gas fee structures. It’s harder to coordinate. It’s also harder to monitor... What I’ve Built (So Far) Right now, the dashboard monitors the ETH/USDC pair across four chains in real time. You can visually see: - Realtime ETH price on each chain - Size of most recent trades indicated by bubble size - Max current spread available. I've only finished it this afternoon and after watching it for 15min I've already spotted a few times where the mispricings are significant. I want to add more pairs and chains soon (super easy actually) - just don't want to clutter it before getting more feedback and ideas. I’ve dropped the link to the dashboard in the comments below. If you’ve built a cross-chain arb bot, I’d love to hear how you approached it!

jonjon

45,134 次观看 • 1 年前

"What's the elevator pitch you'd give someone who has no idea what Sui is doing?" I asked Kostas Chalkias (Kostas Kryptos), co-founder of the team behind Sui, former lead cryptographer on Facebook's Libra, to explain it in plain terms. "You still pay to move your own money between banks on the same continent. We broke that. You can send money for free." "You log in with a Google account. No long passwords, no seed phrases to memorize. For the first time, using a blockchain feels like using anything else you already use." "And it's not just for trading anymore. We built the memory layer for AI agents, heavy data, big operations, things you simply can't do on other chains." "Imagine an agent buying 1% of the Burj Khalifa, selling it for gold, converting to dollars, all in one transaction. For that you need real speed. I can't see how the slower chains do it." Translation: most chains are still selling crypto to crypto people. Kostas is describing something else, infrastructure invisible enough that a normal user never thinks about the blockchain, and fast enough that the next users won't even be human. That's a different bet than "number go up." If your grandmother could use a blockchain without knowing it, would that change how big this gets?

"What's the elevator pitch you'd give someone who has no idea what Sui is doing?" I asked Kostas Chalkias (Kostas Kryptos), co-founder of the team behind Sui, former lead cryptographer on Facebook's Libra, to explain it in plain terms. "You still pay to move your own money between banks on the same continent. We broke that. You can send money for free." "You log in with a Google account. No long passwords, no seed phrases to memorize. For the first time, using a blockchain feels like using anything else you already use." "And it's not just for trading anymore. We built the memory layer for AI agents, heavy data, big operations, things you simply can't do on other chains." "Imagine an agent buying 1% of the Burj Khalifa, selling it for gold, converting to dollars, all in one transaction. For that you need real speed. I can't see how the slower chains do it." Translation: most chains are still selling crypto to crypto people. Kostas is describing something else, infrastructure invisible enough that a normal user never thinks about the blockchain, and fast enough that the next users won't even be human. That's a different bet than "number go up." If your grandmother could use a blockchain without knowing it, would that change how big this gets?

Michaël van de Poppe

29,843 次观看 • 1 个月前

Ferrari’s first EV costs $640,000. At that price, it is not competing with Chinese EVs. It is competing with nostalgia. The problem is that the EV era does not worship engine noise, legacy badges, or old European prestige the same way. It rewards batteries, software, supply chains, smart systems, production efficiency, and cost control. In other words, exactly the battlefield where Chinese automakers are strongest. Ferrari can still sell a brand. But China is selling the future as an industrial product. That is why this feels less like a breakthrough — and more like an old empire arriving late to a war whose rules have already changed.

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

12,315 次观看 • 1 个月前

Goooooood morning, we did it everyone!!!! After a long 24-hour ride, Boon Lom is now living her best life at Elephant Nature Park where she’ll never be ridden or abused or in chains again!!! She’s had 3 babies taken from her and been in chains for 35+ years but NEVER AGAIN!!! It’s been an emotional and exhausting week but thank you EVERYONE who donated/shared as together we rescued 2 abused elephants for my birthday and these are the best birthday presents I have EVER received!! As always please retweet this and share this with your followers as rescues are great, but there are still thousands more elephants abused daily and we must make everyone aware to NEVER ride elephants as it’s that uneducated tourism money that funds this cycle of abuse and it needs to stop!!! TOGETHER WE CAN MAKE THAT HAPPEN!

Goooooood morning, we did it everyone!!!! After a long 24-hour ride, Boon Lom is now living her best life at Elephant Nature Park where she’ll never be ridden or abused or in chains again!!! She’s had 3 babies taken from her and been in chains for 35+ years but NEVER AGAIN!!! It’s been an emotional and exhausting week but thank you EVERYONE who donated/shared as together we rescued 2 abused elephants for my birthday and these are the best birthday presents I have EVER received!! As always please retweet this and share this with your followers as rescues are great, but there are still thousands more elephants abused daily and we must make everyone aware to NEVER ride elephants as it’s that uneducated tourism money that funds this cycle of abuse and it needs to stop!!! TOGETHER WE CAN MAKE THAT HAPPEN!

Timothy Sykes

14,278 次观看 • 3 个月前

📍At the G7 Summit in Canada, Trump said he’s not rushing to impose new sanctions on Russia, because he’s “waiting to see” if there will be a deal to end the war in Ukraine. He also mentioned that sanctions are too expensive for the U.S., costing “billions of dollars.” Has anyone shown him the photos and videos from the capital of one of Europe’s largest countries today? Or are the ruins of residential buildings in Kyiv still not enough of a sign for Trump to realize, and I might be wrong, of course (not), that Putin DOESN’T GIVE A F*CK about the U.S. and is just playing cat and mouse with him? And guess who’s the mouse? Too expensive? We’re sorry, dear Americans, that the deaths of our children and civilians, killed while sleeping in their beds, are costing you too much. Sorry if your gas prices went up a little. Or if peanut butter got more expensive. We didn’t mean to inconvenience you. We’re just Ukrainians. Trying to SURVIVE. Trying NOT TO F*CKING DIE.

📍At the G7 Summit in Canada, Trump said he’s not rushing to impose new sanctions on Russia, because he’s “waiting to see” if there will be a deal to end the war in Ukraine. He also mentioned that sanctions are too expensive for the U.S., costing “billions of dollars.” Has anyone shown him the photos and videos from the capital of one of Europe’s largest countries today? Or are the ruins of residential buildings in Kyiv still not enough of a sign for Trump to realize, and I might be wrong, of course (not), that Putin DOESN’T GIVE A FCK about the U.S. and is just playing cat and mouse with him? And guess who’s the mouse? Too expensive? We’re sorry, dear Americans, that the deaths of our children and civilians, killed while sleeping in their beds, are costing you too much. Sorry if your gas prices went up a little. Or if peanut butter got more expensive. We didn’t mean to inconvenience you. We’re just Ukrainians. Trying to SURVIVE. Trying NOT TO FCKING DIE.

Maria Drutska 🇺🇦

60,979 次观看 • 1 年前

Dyer says Judaism is a reaction to Christianity... Adam Green - Know More News "There's no Judeo-Christianity" "Jews, religious Jews are just like Christians. They read the same Bible. They just do not read the New Testament. They do not recognize. No, that's not true" "Judaism is very adamant and has been for a long time that you must also follow the oral tradition which is encapsulated in the Talmud. You can't reject that." "Christianity was considered one of the strands of Judaism. But in the second and third century, they begin to have more and more of a fissure and more of a departure over the person of Christ, whether he's the Messiah." "And so you get a Jerusalem Talmud, a Babylonian Talmud by the fourth, fifth, sixth century that comes together and that solidifies for most Jews what Judaism is that we know today as rabbitic Judaism. And a lot of that, ironically, and many even Jewish scholars will admit this" "Jewish scholars and historians will admit that you don't really get a solidifying fissure until Judaism begins to define itself against the popularity of Christianity in the first, second, and third century. And that that's what develops into what we call rebbitic Judaism" "So the reason it's not the same religion is that Judaism gradually defined itself more and more in opposition to Christianity, especially by the early middle ages. They they're completely separate"

Dyer says Judaism is a reaction to Christianity... Adam Green - Know More News "There's no Judeo-Christianity" "Jews, religious Jews are just like Christians. They read the same Bible. They just do not read the New Testament. They do not recognize. No, that's not true" "Judaism is very adamant and has been for a long time that you must also follow the oral tradition which is encapsulated in the Talmud. You can't reject that." "Christianity was considered one of the strands of Judaism. But in the second and third century, they begin to have more and more of a fissure and more of a departure over the person of Christ, whether he's the Messiah." "And so you get a Jerusalem Talmud, a Babylonian Talmud by the fourth, fifth, sixth century that comes together and that solidifies for most Jews what Judaism is that we know today as rabbitic Judaism. And a lot of that, ironically, and many even Jewish scholars will admit this" "Jewish scholars and historians will admit that you don't really get a solidifying fissure until Judaism begins to define itself against the popularity of Christianity in the first, second, and third century. And that that's what develops into what we call rebbitic Judaism" "So the reason it's not the same religion is that Judaism gradually defined itself more and more in opposition to Christianity, especially by the early middle ages. They they're completely separate"

Seethroughitall

49,275 次观看 • 3 个月前

everyone is arguing whether spacex at $2 trillion is too expensive, almost nobody noticed what actually changed since 1980 apple went public at under $2 billion and 15 times revenue back then spacex wants you to buy at nearly $2 trillion and 100 times revenue now but the real story is not the price, it is that the entire nature of an IPO changed underneath us in 1980 you bought a business and hoped for a vision, in 2026 you buy the vision and hope for the business almost nobody buying this IPO on june 12 will read the 300 page document to understand which one they are actually getting i fed both filings to Claude and had it find the five differences that explain the whole shift that understanding is the edge most retail will never bother to get

everyone is arguing whether spacex at $2 trillion is too expensive, almost nobody noticed what actually changed since 1980 apple went public at under $2 billion and 15 times revenue back then spacex wants you to buy at nearly $2 trillion and 100 times revenue now but the real story is not the price, it is that the entire nature of an IPO changed underneath us in 1980 you bought a business and hoped for a vision, in 2026 you buy the vision and hope for the business almost nobody buying this IPO on june 12 will read the 300 page document to understand which one they are actually getting i fed both filings to Claude and had it find the five differences that explain the whole shift that understanding is the edge most retail will never bother to get

John Doe

1,203,284 次观看 • 1 个月前

This scene always makes me think about what markets do once a simple asset story is no longer enough. At first people buy the thing itself. Then, at some point, that stops being exciting enough. So the market starts building layers around it. A structure. A wrapper. A more financial version of the same idea. That is why MSTR comes to mind for me here. Not because it is the same as a synthetic CDO. It obviously is not. But because the instinct feels familiar. If you believe in Bitcoin, the clean path is simple. You buy Bitcoin. If you want a more traditional route, you buy the ETF. That should be enough. But MSTR is something else entirely. It is Bitcoin, turned into a corporate vehicle, then turned into a capital markets machine, then turned into a narrative people are willing to value differently from the asset underneath it. And that is where it starts feeling less like pure exposure and more like financial engineering built around exposure. We have seen this movie before in different forms. Markets love taking a real asset, wrapping it in a new story, and then assigning the wrapper a value that starts drifting away from the thing it actually holds. As long as that premium stays alive, the machine keeps working. More demand for the structure. More capital raised. More accumulation. Bigger story. More believers. On the way up, it all looks brilliant. That is always the seductive part. In strong markets, even very simple reflexive loops can look like genius. The real question only shows up later, when the mood changes and people start asking whether the value was in the underlying asset all along, or in the extra meaning the market temporarily assigned to the structure built around it. That is why I find this clip so relevant. It is not just a reminder of 2008. It is a reminder of a deeper market habit. People rarely stop at owning the thing. They almost always find a way to build another layer on top of it. And to me, that is the more interesting question around MSTR. Not how much more Bitcoin it can buy. But how long the market will keep rewarding the wrapper more than the thing inside it.

This scene always makes me think about what markets do once a simple asset story is no longer enough. At first people buy the thing itself. Then, at some point, that stops being exciting enough. So the market starts building layers around it. A structure. A wrapper. A more financial version of the same idea. That is why MSTR comes to mind for me here. Not because it is the same as a synthetic CDO. It obviously is not. But because the instinct feels familiar. If you believe in Bitcoin, the clean path is simple. You buy Bitcoin. If you want a more traditional route, you buy the ETF. That should be enough. But MSTR is something else entirely. It is Bitcoin, turned into a corporate vehicle, then turned into a capital markets machine, then turned into a narrative people are willing to value differently from the asset underneath it. And that is where it starts feeling less like pure exposure and more like financial engineering built around exposure. We have seen this movie before in different forms. Markets love taking a real asset, wrapping it in a new story, and then assigning the wrapper a value that starts drifting away from the thing it actually holds. As long as that premium stays alive, the machine keeps working. More demand for the structure. More capital raised. More accumulation. Bigger story. More believers. On the way up, it all looks brilliant. That is always the seductive part. In strong markets, even very simple reflexive loops can look like genius. The real question only shows up later, when the mood changes and people start asking whether the value was in the underlying asset all along, or in the extra meaning the market temporarily assigned to the structure built around it. That is why I find this clip so relevant. It is not just a reminder of 2008. It is a reminder of a deeper market habit. People rarely stop at owning the thing. They almost always find a way to build another layer on top of it. And to me, that is the more interesting question around MSTR. Not how much more Bitcoin it can buy. But how long the market will keep rewarding the wrapper more than the thing inside it.

Mercek

14,644 次观看 • 3 个月前

DeepMind CEO Demis Hassabis says the AI bottleneck is already moving from model ideas to physical supply chains. "How much of the restriction at this point is physical? I am talking memory shortage, GPU shortage, and electricity." Demis: "That is constraining a lot of the deployment for sure. We see so much more demand for our models - Gemini and the other models that we have - than we can possibly serve." Then the less obvious part: "It does constrain a little bit the research, because you need a lot of chips to be able to experiment on new ideas at big enough scale that you can actually see if they are going to work." And on memory: "The whole supply chain is kind of strained... It still in the end actually comes down to a few suppliers of a few of the key components. Anywhere where there is some kind of constraint on the capacity, there is a sort of choke point." Important framing: The next AI race is not just who has the best model architecture. It is who can secure memory, chips, power, suppliers, and enough experimental capacity to find the next breakthrough before everyone else.

DeepMind CEO Demis Hassabis says the AI bottleneck is already moving from model ideas to physical supply chains. "How much of the restriction at this point is physical? I am talking memory shortage, GPU shortage, and electricity." Demis: "That is constraining a lot of the deployment for sure. We see so much more demand for our models - Gemini and the other models that we have - than we can possibly serve." Then the less obvious part: "It does constrain a little bit the research, because you need a lot of chips to be able to experiment on new ideas at big enough scale that you can actually see if they are going to work." And on memory: "The whole supply chain is kind of strained... It still in the end actually comes down to a few suppliers of a few of the key components. Anywhere where there is some kind of constraint on the capacity, there is a sort of choke point." Important framing: The next AI race is not just who has the best model architecture. It is who can secure memory, chips, power, suppliers, and enough experimental capacity to find the next breakthrough before everyone else.

Karl Mehta

25,716 次观看 • 27 天前

When I roll, I’m not trying to win as much as I’m trying not to get injured. My default mode is defensive driving. I’m trying to get to my destination without getting in a wreck on the way there. In this clip, I counter the waiter sweep early because I’m sensitive to my knee locking up. If my leg gets bent some type of way, my meniscus catches and locks up, so I react early. Not necessarily because I’m trying to stop the sweep, but because I’m protecting my body. That sensitivity actually becomes good defense. Keeping my leg straight stops the waiter sweep before it starts. I feel this way about MMA grappling. It’s more intuitive because the main priority is obvious: don’t get hit. That removes a lot of decision fatigue. In sport Jiu Jitsu, there can be too many options, too many techniques, and too much thinking. That’s one of the traps for Jiu Jitsu nerds. If you get too deep into the tech, you can end up frozen by choices. The other solution is to systematize everything, and that kills creativity. Just protect yourself and everything else will fall into place. Learn Jiu Jitsu.

When I roll, I’m not trying to win as much as I’m trying not to get injured. My default mode is defensive driving. I’m trying to get to my destination without getting in a wreck on the way there. In this clip, I counter the waiter sweep early because I’m sensitive to my knee locking up. If my leg gets bent some type of way, my meniscus catches and locks up, so I react early. Not necessarily because I’m trying to stop the sweep, but because I’m protecting my body. That sensitivity actually becomes good defense. Keeping my leg straight stops the waiter sweep before it starts. I feel this way about MMA grappling. It’s more intuitive because the main priority is obvious: don’t get hit. That removes a lot of decision fatigue. In sport Jiu Jitsu, there can be too many options, too many techniques, and too much thinking. That’s one of the traps for Jiu Jitsu nerds. If you get too deep into the tech, you can end up frozen by choices. The other solution is to systematize everything, and that kills creativity. Just protect yourself and everything else will fall into place. Learn Jiu Jitsu.

Drewlock

23,546 次观看 • 19 天前