Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Gad Saad drops evolutionary truth on luxury spending "Ferrari owners are 99% male—even though millions of wealthy women could buy one. Why? Fancy cars are the human version of a peacock's tail—status signaling to attract mates. Women signal through beautification instead. Humans are consumatory animals—we use products to scream... show more

Camus

452,132 subscribers

321,509 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik Bildung Wissenschaft & Technologie

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

🚨 GAD SAAD: MEN SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO COMPETE IN WOMEN'S SPORTS “In the opening chapter of The Parasitic Mind, I talk about my 2 foundational life ideals, which are truth and freedom. So even if not a single woman had been harmed through this lunacy, to me, it is still an affront to human reason, because we are a sexually dimorphic species. That's the fancy term, meaning that, on average, men and women are not the same. That's certainly true when it comes to physical strength.” Source: Gad Saad

🚨 GAD SAAD: MEN SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO COMPETE IN WOMEN'S SPORTS “In the opening chapter of The Parasitic Mind, I talk about my 2 foundational life ideals, which are truth and freedom. So even if not a single woman had been harmed through this lunacy, to me, it is still an affront to human reason, because we are a sexually dimorphic species. That's the fancy term, meaning that, on average, men and women are not the same. That's certainly true when it comes to physical strength.” Source: Gad Saad

Mario Nawfal

126,548 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Dr. Daniel Amen dropped some eye-opening brain science on Chris Williamson: “Women have 52% less serotonin than men on average.” That’s one reason women are roughly twice as likely to suffer from depression and tend to ruminate more when upset — their brain gets “stuck” on negative thoughts. On the flip side, women show significantly better frontal lobe function, which helps explain why they go to jail about 14 times less than men. Testosterone and higher male risk-taking play a big role too. Fascinating how biology shapes these patterns. How much do you think these kinds of innate brain differences actually influence behavior and mental health between men and women?

Dr. Daniel Amen dropped some eye-opening brain science on Chris Williamson: “Women have 52% less serotonin than men on average.” That’s one reason women are roughly twice as likely to suffer from depression and tend to ruminate more when upset — their brain gets “stuck” on negative thoughts. On the flip side, women show significantly better frontal lobe function, which helps explain why they go to jail about 14 times less than men. Testosterone and higher male risk-taking play a big role too. Fascinating how biology shapes these patterns. How much do you think these kinds of innate brain differences actually influence behavior and mental health between men and women?

Camus

112,436 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Standard Intelligence's devansh responds to roon's tweet that "text is the universal interface," and explains why their new foundation model is trained on video: "At some point in the arbitrarily long future, if we only use text models, we could force most things to be text. But I think there are just a lot of things that are much more native when done from a computer-use [perspective]." "GUIs are designed for humans to use. We have this massive long tail of things on the internet that are entirely undoable by LLMs." "For example, when I do ML engineering most of my time is spent doing the grunt work of engineering. It's a lot of looking at graphs, analyzing, and comparing loss curves. You can do this in text, but it's a much larger pain than doing it in the native interface." "There's a reason humans don't interact with a computer purely through text, it would kind of suck."

Standard Intelligence's devansh responds to roon's tweet that "text is the universal interface," and explains why their new foundation model is trained on video: "At some point in the arbitrarily long future, if we only use text models, we could force most things to be text. But I think there are just a lot of things that are much more native when done from a computer-use [perspective]." "GUIs are designed for humans to use. We have this massive long tail of things on the internet that are entirely undoable by LLMs." "For example, when I do ML engineering most of my time is spent doing the grunt work of engineering. It's a lot of looking at graphs, analyzing, and comparing loss curves. You can do this in text, but it's a much larger pain than doing it in the native interface." "There's a reason humans don't interact with a computer purely through text, it would kind of suck."

TBPN

64,434 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

In studies where women are shown the same man with different levels of facial hair—clean-shaven, stubble, full beard—the results are mixed. Some women prefer beards, others don’t, and for many, it depends. There’s no strong consensus. But with men, the pattern is clearer. Across studies, men tend to see bearded men as more dominant than clean-shaven ones. The same goes for deep voices. Women generally find them more attractive, but men are more likely to view deep voices as threatening. So while women’s preference for deep voices is moderate, men often see them as a sign of intimidation. It’s the same with muscularity. Women usually like it, but the preference is mild. Men, though, often report feeling more threatened around muscular guys. Male traits like muscles, facial hair, and deep voices likely evolved more through competition with other men than through female choice. Psychologist Steve Stewart-Williams puts it like this: male secondary sex characteristics are more like a deer’s antlers than a peacock’s tail. Peacock tails evolved to attract mates. Antlers evolved to fight rivals or intimidate them.

In studies where women are shown the same man with different levels of facial hair—clean-shaven, stubble, full beard—the results are mixed. Some women prefer beards, others don’t, and for many, it depends. There’s no strong consensus. But with men, the pattern is clearer. Across studies, men tend to see bearded men as more dominant than clean-shaven ones. The same goes for deep voices. Women generally find them more attractive, but men are more likely to view deep voices as threatening. So while women’s preference for deep voices is moderate, men often see them as a sign of intimidation. It’s the same with muscularity. Women usually like it, but the preference is mild. Men, though, often report feeling more threatened around muscular guys. Male traits like muscles, facial hair, and deep voices likely evolved more through competition with other men than through female choice. Psychologist Steve Stewart-Williams puts it like this: male secondary sex characteristics are more like a deer’s antlers than a peacock’s tail. Peacock tails evolved to attract mates. Antlers evolved to fight rivals or intimidate them.

Rob Henderson

43,134 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Clavicular on why rappers settling for BBL women is actually cope "The top of the top women aren't getting with rappers. There's quite simply dudes who are better looking, have more money, and more status than these rappers. Even Kick streamers have more money than these rappers." "A lot of the times they have to cope and tell themselves they have a preference for these women who have super fat asses or are a little bit overweight. Rather than actually acknowledging the problem that they can't get with the top level women, it's cope." "Rappers really don't have that much money. They're financially irresponsible. Five years after they're retired they got no money left. They're just not that top echelon where they could get with models who are in shape with perfectly natural bodies."

Clavicular on why rappers settling for BBL women is actually cope "The top of the top women aren't getting with rappers. There's quite simply dudes who are better looking, have more money, and more status than these rappers. Even Kick streamers have more money than these rappers." "A lot of the times they have to cope and tell themselves they have a preference for these women who have super fat asses or are a little bit overweight. Rather than actually acknowledging the problem that they can't get with the top level women, it's cope." "Rappers really don't have that much money. They're financially irresponsible. Five years after they're retired they got no money left. They're just not that top echelon where they could get with models who are in shape with perfectly natural bodies."

Kai

759,086 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Did a PGX Ideas episode with Gad Saad. In case you guys aren’t familiar with the format — I take one central question and chase it with the guest. With Gad, I asked: Why do we want what we want? That led us to questions like: - Why humans are wired to consume - Why we over-consume and compare - Why men chase power - How marketing exploits evolutionary instincts - Why people buy ideologies, not just products - And how technology will change human desire itself The Hindi-dubbed AI version is also attached in this thread. Timestamps: 00:00 — Why are humans wired to consume? 05:27 — Why do people avoid emotional principles? 08:36 — Why do we over-consume? 13:04 — Why do men chase power? 17:32 — How do humans consume? 29:40 — Are fake smiles a form of social deception? 33:11 — Why did Mamdani win? 39:40 — What do marketers understand about humans? 43:24 — Why do we buy through comparison? 45:44 — What’s broken in modern society? 48:10 — Why do intellectuals dress poorly? 56:14 — How marketing psychology actually works 1:05:00 — How do generations differ in consumption? 1:07:44 — The Sydney Sweeney controversy 1:10:33 — Does morality shape evolution? 1:15:35 — How will technology change consumption? 1:22:46 — Questions for me

Did a PGX Ideas episode with Gad Saad. In case you guys aren’t familiar with the format — I take one central question and chase it with the guest. With Gad, I asked: Why do we want what we want? That led us to questions like: - Why humans are wired to consume - Why we over-consume and compare - Why men chase power - How marketing exploits evolutionary instincts - Why people buy ideologies, not just products - And how technology will change human desire itself The Hindi-dubbed AI version is also attached in this thread. Timestamps: 00:00 — Why are humans wired to consume? 05:27 — Why do people avoid emotional principles? 08:36 — Why do we over-consume? 13:04 — Why do men chase power? 17:32 — How do humans consume? 29:40 — Are fake smiles a form of social deception? 33:11 — Why did Mamdani win? 39:40 — What do marketers understand about humans? 43:24 — Why do we buy through comparison? 45:44 — What’s broken in modern society? 48:10 — Why do intellectuals dress poorly? 56:14 — How marketing psychology actually works 1:05:00 — How do generations differ in consumption? 1:07:44 — The Sydney Sweeney controversy 1:10:33 — Does morality shape evolution? 1:15:35 — How will technology change consumption? 1:22:46 — Questions for me

Prakhar Gupta

30,694 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

We have a declining birth rate and much of that is due to more women not wanting children…. Or MORE children. But why? According to studies from UCL and Bath University, women still do the bulk of the housework/hands on childcare even if they work full time and out earn their partner…. If couples split and co parent, even if the woman works, again they predominantly have the children more and now women are experiencing burn out. Men are you cooking and cleaning as much as your women if you both work full time 👀👀 Do you use your initiative, instead of waiting for her to ask you, or nag you ❓ 👀 Full conversation

We have a declining birth rate and much of that is due to more women not wanting children…. Or MORE children. But why? According to studies from UCL and Bath University, women still do the bulk of the housework/hands on childcare even if they work full time and out earn their partner…. If couples split and co parent, even if the woman works, again they predominantly have the children more and now women are experiencing burn out. Men are you cooking and cleaning as much as your women if you both work full time 👀👀 Do you use your initiative, instead of waiting for her to ask you, or nag you ❓ 👀 Full conversation

Lin Mei

23,937 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🚨 WOMEN ARE SUDDENLY HAVING DOUBLE PERIODS AND RANDOM PREGNANCIES — AND NO ONE KNOWS WHY Something strange is happening to women around the world. Millions are reporting sudden changes in their cycles: • Two periods in one month • Periods stopping completely • Women who struggled for years to conceive… suddenly pregnant A lot of these reports started right after CERN went offline. Some people are blaming shifts in Earth’s vibration and the Schumann resonance. Others say women’s bodies are becoming more “in sync” with natural frequencies again. But a growing number of people think something more serious is going on. Something that could be affecting human DNA. Too many women are experiencing the exact same changes at the same time for this to be random. Are we really supposed to believe this is just a coincidence… or is something being done to women’s bodies?

🚨 WOMEN ARE SUDDENLY HAVING DOUBLE PERIODS AND RANDOM PREGNANCIES — AND NO ONE KNOWS WHY Something strange is happening to women around the world. Millions are reporting sudden changes in their cycles: • Two periods in one month • Periods stopping completely • Women who struggled for years to conceive… suddenly pregnant A lot of these reports started right after CERN went offline. Some people are blaming shifts in Earth’s vibration and the Schumann resonance. Others say women’s bodies are becoming more “in sync” with natural frequencies again. But a growing number of people think something more serious is going on. Something that could be affecting human DNA. Too many women are experiencing the exact same changes at the same time for this to be random. Are we really supposed to believe this is just a coincidence… or is something being done to women’s bodies?

HustleBitch

44,236 Aufrufe • vor 1 Tag

NEW: JD Vance explains the new phenomenon where white progressives are encouraging their children to be trans so they can virtue signal. Rogan: "There has to be some reason why there is an enormous percentage of Hollywood kids who are trans." Vance: "It becomes a social signifier for a lot of parents." "Look at where the gender craziness is the most common. It's most common among upper-middle-class to lower-middle-class white progressives." "Now, you could believe that there's just something genetic going in the mind of a wealthy white progressive or you could believe that this is a cultural trend we should be questioning a lot more than we are right now."

NEW: JD Vance explains the new phenomenon where white progressives are encouraging their children to be trans so they can virtue signal. Rogan: "There has to be some reason why there is an enormous percentage of Hollywood kids who are trans." Vance: "It becomes a social signifier for a lot of parents." "Look at where the gender craziness is the most common. It's most common among upper-middle-class to lower-middle-class white progressives." "Now, you could believe that there's just something genetic going in the mind of a wealthy white progressive or you could believe that this is a cultural trend we should be questioning a lot more than we are right now."

Collin Rugg

862,039 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Shuler: This is the choice working Americans have been given: chaos, or the same broken status quo. We wanted cheaper groceries—and we got tanks in our streets. We wanted affordable health care—and instead, 16 million Americans are about to be kicked off their coverage. We wanted jobs you could raise a family on. But that’s not what we got. We got more American workers laid off last month than in any month since the start of the pandemic. The American people said, loud and clear, that unions are the one thing we agree on. Instead, this administration attacked us—and the workers who keep this country going.

Shuler: This is the choice working Americans have been given: chaos, or the same broken status quo. We wanted cheaper groceries—and we got tanks in our streets. We wanted affordable health care—and instead, 16 million Americans are about to be kicked off their coverage. We wanted jobs you could raise a family on. But that’s not what we got. We got more American workers laid off last month than in any month since the start of the pandemic. The American people said, loud and clear, that unions are the one thing we agree on. Instead, this administration attacked us—and the workers who keep this country going.

Acyn

99,132 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Much of male striving begins with a simple, ancient desire: to stand above others, even when no obvious prize is on offer. To be clear, the quest for increased romantic opportunities is not the only reason why men seek status. The desire to attract women is often unconscious, with no direct link to the emotional systems that drive men to triumph in conflicts against male competitors. Rather, men are inclined to seek status for its own sake, even in scenarios where local norms limit their ability to obtain multiple romantic partners. Acquiring wealth and status is intrinsically satisfying, even if it never leads to increased romantic appeal. Human males appear to have a general program installed that propels them to stand out among other males even if no women are present, as is the case in prisons. Besting others is often a reward in itself, because, in the ancestral environment, victory was so closely tied to reproductive success. Nevertheless, if given a contrived choice between material prosperity but permanent celibacy, or material impoverishment accompanied by abundant romantic interest from numerous women, the majority of young males would prefer the latter. In other words, most guys would prefer to be poor but romantically appealing rather than rich but romantically shunned.

Much of male striving begins with a simple, ancient desire: to stand above others, even when no obvious prize is on offer. To be clear, the quest for increased romantic opportunities is not the only reason why men seek status. The desire to attract women is often unconscious, with no direct link to the emotional systems that drive men to triumph in conflicts against male competitors. Rather, men are inclined to seek status for its own sake, even in scenarios where local norms limit their ability to obtain multiple romantic partners. Acquiring wealth and status is intrinsically satisfying, even if it never leads to increased romantic appeal. Human males appear to have a general program installed that propels them to stand out among other males even if no women are present, as is the case in prisons. Besting others is often a reward in itself, because, in the ancestral environment, victory was so closely tied to reproductive success. Nevertheless, if given a contrived choice between material prosperity but permanent celibacy, or material impoverishment accompanied by abundant romantic interest from numerous women, the majority of young males would prefer the latter. In other words, most guys would prefer to be poor but romantically appealing rather than rich but romantically shunned.

Rob Henderson

17,148 Aufrufe • vor 29 Tagen

Stephen Wolfram just posed the most disturbing thought experiment about AI, and nobody has an answer for it. Wolfram: “Imagine humans are all in boxes. We’re all Darth Vader, inside these boxes, but you can’t actually see the human inside.” Civilization continues identically. Every human hidden in a machine. You see the output, not the person. Wolfram: “The world is operating, great paintings are being produced, but you can’t see any of the humans. All you see is a bunch of boxes doing human-like things.” Civilizational Turing test. If the external world operates the same, are humans contributing anything essential? Wolfram: “The world is operating as before, maybe even better than before. If you knew there were humans inside those boxes, you would say great outcome.” That’s the paradox. Know humans are inside and it’s a golden age. Remove that knowledge and it’s just machines producing results. Does the value change? Wolfram forces the question. Do we value creation or creator? If the art is identical, does consciousness behind it matter? Wolfram: “You can’t tell there are any humans. It’s just a bunch of Daleks operating.” From outside, machines behaving like humans look identical to actual humans. The show continues. Universe doesn’t register the difference. As AI capabilities expand, this stops being abstract. AI produces indistinguishable art, music, science. Does human creation retain special status? Why exactly? Wolfram isn’t answering. He’s exposing the void where our answer should be. If outcomes are identical, is human involvement meaningful or just attachment to how things historically worked? We assume human participation makes civilization valuable. If results don’t change either way, that assumption needs justification we’ve never properly given. Real test isn’t whether AI replicates output. It’s whether we can explain why human output matters more when the results are indistinguishable. If we can’t, we’re heading toward a future where civilization functions perfectly and whether humans are actually inside the boxes becomes irrelevant to everything except the humans wondering if they matter. And at that point, are we necessary or just witnesses to a system that would operate identically without us, asking questions that have no impact on anything except our own sense of purpose?

Stephen Wolfram just posed the most disturbing thought experiment about AI, and nobody has an answer for it. Wolfram: “Imagine humans are all in boxes. We’re all Darth Vader, inside these boxes, but you can’t actually see the human inside.” Civilization continues identically. Every human hidden in a machine. You see the output, not the person. Wolfram: “The world is operating, great paintings are being produced, but you can’t see any of the humans. All you see is a bunch of boxes doing human-like things.” Civilizational Turing test. If the external world operates the same, are humans contributing anything essential? Wolfram: “The world is operating as before, maybe even better than before. If you knew there were humans inside those boxes, you would say great outcome.” That’s the paradox. Know humans are inside and it’s a golden age. Remove that knowledge and it’s just machines producing results. Does the value change? Wolfram forces the question. Do we value creation or creator? If the art is identical, does consciousness behind it matter? Wolfram: “You can’t tell there are any humans. It’s just a bunch of Daleks operating.” From outside, machines behaving like humans look identical to actual humans. The show continues. Universe doesn’t register the difference. As AI capabilities expand, this stops being abstract. AI produces indistinguishable art, music, science. Does human creation retain special status? Why exactly? Wolfram isn’t answering. He’s exposing the void where our answer should be. If outcomes are identical, is human involvement meaningful or just attachment to how things historically worked? We assume human participation makes civilization valuable. If results don’t change either way, that assumption needs justification we’ve never properly given. Real test isn’t whether AI replicates output. It’s whether we can explain why human output matters more when the results are indistinguishable. If we can’t, we’re heading toward a future where civilization functions perfectly and whether humans are actually inside the boxes becomes irrelevant to everything except the humans wondering if they matter. And at that point, are we necessary or just witnesses to a system that would operate identically without us, asking questions that have no impact on anything except our own sense of purpose?

Dustin

198,102 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Donald Trump, "I'm not happy with the European Union, and we're going to win that financial battle" "Absolutely put tariffs on European cars.. They have millions of cars coming in.. And they don't accept our cars.. We make great cars" "They don't have our farm products, we have the greatest farmers in the world" "Things are going to change.. This is not going to be a tough battle" "We'll be doing reciprocal tariffs, whatever they charge us we will charge them" "I don't know why people get upset about that because there's nothing more fair than that"

Donald Trump, "I'm not happy with the European Union, and we're going to win that financial battle" "Absolutely put tariffs on European cars.. They have millions of cars coming in.. And they don't accept our cars.. We make great cars" "They don't have our farm products, we have the greatest farmers in the world" "Things are going to change.. This is not going to be a tough battle" "We'll be doing reciprocal tariffs, whatever they charge us we will charge them" "I don't know why people get upset about that because there's nothing more fair than that"

Farrukh

2,130,937 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

We can get killed simply for making this video. This week, members of the Iranian parliament tried to blame me for the growing movement of women walking unveiled, as if one woman’s voice could explain why millions refuse to bow to tyranny. Their outrage was a direct response to Mohammad Reza Bahonar, who admitted in despair: “the regime can no longer force women to wear the hijab.” But the truth is not about me and it’s not about hijab. It’s written on the streets of Iran. Watch the women in these videos: when they say “No” to forced hijab, they are not making a fashion statement. They are risking prison, lashes, and even death. They are standing bareheaded against the entire regime. And when the regime sends guns, bullets, and assassins to our doorsteps, it’s because they fear the power of this defiance. That’s why we will not let the Islamic Republic’s lobby distort this fight. If you want the truth, don’t listen to politicians or propaganda. Listen to the ordinary women in the streets of Iran.👇👇

We can get killed simply for making this video. This week, members of the Iranian parliament tried to blame me for the growing movement of women walking unveiled, as if one woman’s voice could explain why millions refuse to bow to tyranny. Their outrage was a direct response to Mohammad Reza Bahonar, who admitted in despair: “the regime can no longer force women to wear the hijab.” But the truth is not about me and it’s not about hijab. It’s written on the streets of Iran. Watch the women in these videos: when they say “No” to forced hijab, they are not making a fashion statement. They are risking prison, lashes, and even death. They are standing bareheaded against the entire regime. And when the regime sends guns, bullets, and assassins to our doorsteps, it’s because they fear the power of this defiance. That’s why we will not let the Islamic Republic’s lobby distort this fight. If you want the truth, don’t listen to politicians or propaganda. Listen to the ordinary women in the streets of Iran.👇👇

Masih Alinejad 🏳️

34,115 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Physicist Avi Loeb just told me that futuristic technology could enable humanity to travel “faster than the speed of light.” But we would have to move beyond the three dimensions we are familiar with. And he speculated that advanced alien civilizations could already have access to these dimensions. You need to hear his fascinating theory: “Think about living on the surface of a balloon.” “That is two dimensional.” “You might not be aware that there is a third dimension because you are just living on the surface of that balloon.” “If there is another being that is capable of taking advantage of the third dimension, then that being will cross the distance between two points on the surface of the balloon faster than you can imagine.” “Because the travel between the two points can go through the third dimension that connects the two points—not necessarily on the curved surface of the balloon.” “So there are, in principle, possibilities of navigating in more than the dimensions that we are familiar with.” “We are familiar with three spatial dimensions plus time.” “If there are more than three and there is a technological way of taking advantage of those … objects will appear and disappear in ways that we cannot understand.” “Einstein’s theory of relativity states that no material object can move faster than light.” “However, if there are extra dimensions, you might actually travel faster than light in the three dimensions, even though you’re traveling less than the speed of light in the extra dimensions.”

Physicist Avi Loeb just told me that futuristic technology could enable humanity to travel “faster than the speed of light.” But we would have to move beyond the three dimensions we are familiar with. And he speculated that advanced alien civilizations could already have access to these dimensions. You need to hear his fascinating theory: “Think about living on the surface of a balloon.” “That is two dimensional.” “You might not be aware that there is a third dimension because you are just living on the surface of that balloon.” “If there is another being that is capable of taking advantage of the third dimension, then that being will cross the distance between two points on the surface of the balloon faster than you can imagine.” “Because the travel between the two points can go through the third dimension that connects the two points—not necessarily on the curved surface of the balloon.” “So there are, in principle, possibilities of navigating in more than the dimensions that we are familiar with.” “We are familiar with three spatial dimensions plus time.” “If there are more than three and there is a technological way of taking advantage of those … objects will appear and disappear in ways that we cannot understand.” “Einstein’s theory of relativity states that no material object can move faster than light.” “However, if there are extra dimensions, you might actually travel faster than light in the three dimensions, even though you’re traveling less than the speed of light in the extra dimensions.”

Jan Jekielek

31,984 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Tucker and Nick Fuentes on arresting the owners of porn companies, and preventing the prostitution of millions of young women through OnlyFans: Tucker: "Why would any of this be legal? Why wouldn't you arrest the people who run something like that?" Nick: "They should be –– if you had a Christian government." Tucker: "Or how about a government that cares about its people. I mean, is Iran a bigger threat or is OnlyFans? Iran's not turning my daughters to prostitution. That seems like one of the worst things that could happen to any society." Nick then explains there would likely be broad support among voters under 50 for prosecuting the owners of porn companies for the damage they’re doing to the country. Roughly 1.6 million American women are on OnlyFans, and nearly 1 million are under the age of 30.

Sensitive content

Tucker and Nick Fuentes on arresting the owners of porn companies, and preventing the prostitution of millions of young women through OnlyFans: Tucker: "Why would any of this be legal? Why wouldn't you arrest the people who run something like that?" Nick: "They should be –– if you had a Christian government." Tucker: "Or how about a government that cares about its people. I mean, is Iran a bigger threat or is OnlyFans? Iran's not turning my daughters to prostitution. That seems like one of the worst things that could happen to any society." Nick then explains there would likely be broad support among voters under 50 for prosecuting the owners of porn companies for the damage they’re doing to the country. Roughly 1.6 million American women are on OnlyFans, and nearly 1 million are under the age of 30.

SOVEREIGN BRAH 🇺🇸🏛️⚡️

834,124 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Tell me what is more than the oppression of locking women in their homes and preventing them from going to work in the one of tradition? Because of one Oloolu with no root in Ibadan? Or you think we don’t know Oloolu is I waka come? Atohun rinwa. An outsider wants to intimidate us? lol 😂 Come to think of it, Can you imagine on a Monday which the elebo claim to be Ojo Aje, yet they want to rip Ojo Aje of its blessings when they know women are the ones who constitute the major traders in the Ibadan markets. What is the sense in this? What about pregnant women who may need emergency services? What about women who feed from hands to mouth? We are not even begging you to stop or review anything. Our daughters, sisters, mothers, and aunts will come out and nothing will happen. This is 2026, we are not in 1960. Cowards

Tell me what is more than the oppression of locking women in their homes and preventing them from going to work in the one of tradition? Because of one Oloolu with no root in Ibadan? Or you think we don’t know Oloolu is I waka come? Atohun rinwa. An outsider wants to intimidate us? lol 😂 Come to think of it, Can you imagine on a Monday which the elebo claim to be Ojo Aje, yet they want to rip Ojo Aje of its blessings when they know women are the ones who constitute the major traders in the Ibadan markets. What is the sense in this? What about pregnant women who may need emergency services? What about women who feed from hands to mouth? We are not even begging you to stop or review anything. Our daughters, sisters, mothers, and aunts will come out and nothing will happen. This is 2026, we are not in 1960. Cowards

A.Y.O

78,691 Aufrufe • vor 8 Tagen

One of the main reasons why you can't afford to buy a house: The wealthy (people like Dave Ramsey) use residential real estate as a savings account. You are their cash flow. As they buy more houses than they need, the market price of real estate rises. Dave owns THOUSANDS of rental properties. He does it to collect rental income EVEN THOUGH HE HAS HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF DOLLARS. #Bitcoin takes attention away from real estate as an investment/savings vehicle. People like Dave want you to stay away from it so you keep working hard to buy real estate. You are his exit liquidity. You start focusing on Bitcoin = decreased demand for RE = prices go down = Dave's portfolio suffers Do you get it yet? In 10+ years when houses are selling for 0.0001 Bitcoin or less, Dave's entire portfolio will barely buy him 1 Bitcoin. He will be FORCED to sell all the homes he accumulated over the last 40 years, because real estate will no longer be profitable. This is the wealth transfer I'm looking forward to.

One of the main reasons why you can't afford to buy a house: The wealthy (people like Dave Ramsey) use residential real estate as a savings account. You are their cash flow. As they buy more houses than they need, the market price of real estate rises. Dave owns THOUSANDS of rental properties. He does it to collect rental income EVEN THOUGH HE HAS HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF DOLLARS. #Bitcoin takes attention away from real estate as an investment/savings vehicle. People like Dave want you to stay away from it so you keep working hard to buy real estate. You are his exit liquidity. You start focusing on Bitcoin = decreased demand for RE = prices go down = Dave's portfolio suffers Do you get it yet? In 10+ years when houses are selling for 0.0001 Bitcoin or less, Dave's entire portfolio will barely buy him 1 Bitcoin. He will be FORCED to sell all the homes he accumulated over the last 40 years, because real estate will no longer be profitable. This is the wealth transfer I'm looking forward to.

Rajat Soni, CFA

161,807 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

It is infinitely easier for white men to sleep with black women for the same reason it is easier for PL champions to sign Championship players. Beyond the denial and online posturing, blacks recognise white superiority and so the s'xual attraction of a white man to a black woman is validating and status-enhancing for her. Hence, when an African woman realises a white man finds her desirable, she jumps at the opportunity and spreads her legs faster than fake news on whatsapp. This is why you will find a million 'The Russian' in Africa before you find one 'The Nigerian' in Europe. Whilst there are other inducements like money and relocation prospects, the principal incentive is the validation of being desired by a man from a superior race whose women are more desirable than yours. It's not juju or hypnosis; women are both cheap and 'expensive'. It is their valuation of you that determines what version you get. And if you're a young white man in Africa, you don't even get cheap or expensive. You get free

Sensitive content

It is infinitely easier for white men to sleep with black women for the same reason it is easier for PL champions to sign Championship players. Beyond the denial and online posturing, blacks recognise white superiority and so the s'xual attraction of a white man to a black woman is validating and status-enhancing for her. Hence, when an African woman realises a white man finds her desirable, she jumps at the opportunity and spreads her legs faster than fake news on whatsapp. This is why you will find a million 'The Russian' in Africa before you find one 'The Nigerian' in Europe. Whilst there are other inducements like money and relocation prospects, the principal incentive is the validation of being desired by a man from a superior race whose women are more desirable than yours. It's not juju or hypnosis; women are both cheap and 'expensive'. It is their valuation of you that determines what version you get. And if you're a young white man in Africa, you don't even get cheap or expensive. You get free

Yehgha

60,095 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten