Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

🚨 Gemini 3.8 Flash first output Gemini 3.8 Flash is getting seriously good at building interactive experience Not perfect, but the progress in generating games is getting ridiculous🔥 Gemini 3.8 Flash is definitely one to watch

Mr_Salio's profile picture

Salio

6,011 subscribers

26,503 просмотров • 3 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash - Anime animation test We know Fable 5.1 is the most capable model for reasoning but now Google launched Gemini 3.8 flash Did it do a good job?
0:30

Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash - Anime animation test We know Fable 5.1 is the most capable model for reasoning but now Google launched Gemini 3.8 flash Did it do a good job?

maxfusion.ai

47,760 просмотров • 3 дней назад

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Opus 5 same prompt to each model and i wasn't expecting gemini 3.8 flash to be this fast! build time: > Opus 5: 24 minutes > 3.8 Flash: 37 seconds 💀 if gemini is given same time as opus 5 it will mog the hell out of opus in terms of quality too which one would you choose here?
0:35

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Opus 5 same prompt to each model and i wasn't expecting gemini 3.8 flash to be this fast! build time: > Opus 5: 24 minutes > 3.8 Flash: 37 seconds 💀 if gemini is given same time as opus 5 it will mog the hell out of opus in terms of quality too which one would you choose here?

Tim Jayas

75,631 просмотров • 3 дней назад

Gemini Flash 3.8 beats Opus 5 at at 15× lower price the test: four self-contained three.js physics scenes — a balloon popped by a needle, a ball dropping into water, a bomb with a mushroom cloud, a live atom model. 5 seconds each, real gravity, real impact. cost: Gemini 3.8 Flash — $0.12 Claude Opus 5 — $1.86 what we saw: • gemini passes the same physics checklist for 15× less — the ball sinks and bobs, ripples spread, the mushroom towers over the scene • gemini is 4× faster — every scene generated in under 70 seconds. opus took up to 5 minutes try Gemini 3.8 Flash on aimlapi[.]com
0:20

Gemini Flash 3.8 beats Opus 5 at at 15× lower price the test: four self-contained three.js physics scenes — a balloon popped by a needle, a ball dropping into water, a bomb with a mushroom cloud, a live atom model. 5 seconds each, real gravity, real impact. cost: Gemini 3.8 Flash — $0.12 Claude Opus 5 — $1.86 what we saw: • gemini passes the same physics checklist for 15× less — the ball sinks and bobs, ripples spread, the mushroom towers over the scene • gemini is 4× faster — every scene generated in under 70 seconds. opus took up to 5 minutes try Gemini 3.8 Flash on aimlapi[.]com

AI/ML API

106,158 просмотров • 3 дней назад

Gemini 3.8 Flash is hardwired for complex reasoning. ⚙️ To test its skills, we built an interactive 3D visualizer with 3.8 Flash and Three.js in Google AI Studio. Watch the model generate realistic, physically-proportioned teardowns for hardware devices. It automatically decomposes devices into layers that users can explode and inspect with a deconstruction slider.
0:33

Gemini 3.8 Flash is hardwired for complex reasoning. ⚙️ To test its skills, we built an interactive 3D visualizer with 3.8 Flash and Three.js in Google AI Studio. Watch the model generate realistic, physically-proportioned teardowns for hardware devices. It automatically decomposes devices into layers that users can explode and inspect with a deconstruction slider.

Google AI Developers

37,202 просмотров • 3 дней назад

The speed of Gemini 3.8 Flash is wild. 35 seconds to rebuild my favourite mobile mini game 🍉 no cuts or speedups, except at the very end!
1:19

The speed of Gemini 3.8 Flash is wild. 35 seconds to rebuild my favourite mobile mini game 🍉 no cuts or speedups, except at the very end!

genevieveh@

73,382 просмотров • 2 дней назад

Gemini 3.5 Flash is good but... 💀
0:41

Gemini 3.5 Flash is good but... 💀

Tim Jayas

35,130 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🚨 New Gemini App UI Update This looks so cool 🤩 like I love it , btw use Gemini flash it's routing to Gemini 3.2 Everything is updated in the app , here is your first experience
0:37

🚨 New Gemini App UI Update This looks so cool 🤩 like I love it , btw use Gemini flash it's routing to Gemini 3.2 Everything is updated in the app , here is your first experience

Chetaslua

217,962 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

I tested Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3 vs GPT 5.6 Sol vs Gemini 3.8 Flash I capped Fable, Kimi & Sol at $2 and asked them to generate this beach scene. Fable 5.1: Looks good at first glance, but made many mistakes, like people sitting on the volleyball court. Kimi K3: It did well. There were no major bugs like in Fable 5.1, and everything looks good. Sol: Bad at 3D scenes as usual, but Astra will definitely fix that. Gemini 3.8 Flash: I ran it in a loop for 35+ mins and it cost $0.95. It didn’t understand what it was fixing. The output here is the enhanced version. IMO, not even Terra level. Gemini's benchmarks say Opus 5-level, but maybe not for spatial understanding. Gemini has other use cases. Which one did the best job?
0:25

I tested Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3 vs GPT 5.6 Sol vs Gemini 3.8 Flash I capped Fable, Kimi & Sol at $2 and asked them to generate this beach scene. Fable 5.1: Looks good at first glance, but made many mistakes, like people sitting on the volleyball court. Kimi K3: It did well. There were no major bugs like in Fable 5.1, and everything looks good. Sol: Bad at 3D scenes as usual, but Astra will definitely fix that. Gemini 3.8 Flash: I ran it in a loop for 35+ mins and it cost $0.95. It didn’t understand what it was fixing. The output here is the enhanced version. IMO, not even Terra level. Gemini's benchmarks say Opus 5-level, but maybe not for spatial understanding. Gemini has other use cases. Which one did the best job?

Bhavy☄️

33,971 просмотров • 2 дней назад

We’re introducing Gemini 3.8 Flash ⚡️ built to tackle complex agentic and multi-step tasks with even greater diligence. Our most intelligent workhorse model yet delivers significant improvements in reasoning, evolving to an AI partner that doesn’t just write code, but can also navigate complex projects. While solving ambiguous and high-friction tasks is immensely helpful, it can also be expensive. Fortunately, 3.8 Flash features the usual effort controls, ensuring that the amount of thinking required to accomplish the task at hand is proportional to the tokens spent. Watch Gemini 3.8 Flash combine native video understanding with advanced coding to autonomously build this 3D game, play it to find errors, and execute code changes in a seamless agentic loop in Google Antigravity.
1:06

We’re introducing Gemini 3.8 Flash ⚡️ built to tackle complex agentic and multi-step tasks with even greater diligence. Our most intelligent workhorse model yet delivers significant improvements in reasoning, evolving to an AI partner that doesn’t just write code, but can also navigate complex projects. While solving ambiguous and high-friction tasks is immensely helpful, it can also be expensive. Fortunately, 3.8 Flash features the usual effort controls, ensuring that the amount of thinking required to accomplish the task at hand is proportional to the tokens spent. Watch Gemini 3.8 Flash combine native video understanding with advanced coding to autonomously build this 3D game, play it to find errors, and execute code changes in a seamless agentic loop in Google Antigravity.

Google AI

190,097 просмотров • 3 дней назад

Here's a comparison i never thought i would make Qwen-3.8-27b vs Gemini-3.7-flash Yes, you read it right! I don't know what to say, this is soo damn impressive. the difference is hugeee🤯 Take a look at this result 😍 (watch it in highest quality) Same prompt, both one shot on web-chat ui Qwen-3.8-27b produces consistent beautiful, visually stunning results. This is one of the best water surface simulations i have seen across every local models i have run and at the same time beating Gemini-3.7-flash result. And this is running on my 3090. And yes its Q5, not even f8.
2:59

Here's a comparison i never thought i would make Qwen-3.8-27b vs Gemini-3.7-flash Yes, you read it right! I don't know what to say, this is soo damn impressive. the difference is hugeee🤯 Take a look at this result 😍 (watch it in highest quality) Same prompt, both one shot on web-chat ui Qwen-3.8-27b produces consistent beautiful, visually stunning results. This is one of the best water surface simulations i have seen across every local models i have run and at the same time beating Gemini-3.7-flash result. And this is running on my 3090. And yes its Q5, not even f8.

AJ

297,128 просмотров • 22 дней назад

glm 5.3 vs qwen 3.8 vs gemini 3.7 vs deepseek v4 flash four models designed and built three structures each on a physics-backed site, with no dimensions anywhere in the brief the setup: our own agent loop on OpenRouter, a construction site as the tool set – footings, walls, arches, roofs, scaffold, a lamp. the site enforces physics and nothing else: unsupported brick falls, a roof needs walls under it, a worker reaches 3.2 m above whatever he stands on, an arch needs centring until the keystone is set, concrete cures before it carries. no budget ceiling – material cost is tallied and reported, never blocked. tasks: 1. house – a plot and a palette, no plan. shape, height and material are the model's call 2. lighthouse – a headland cut by a gully, with a rock stack standing 30 m offshore. the lamp must burn, it must be the highest thing built, and the keeper must be able to walk to it 3. bridge – a river with one islet and banks at different heights. cross it however you want models: Z.ai glm 5.3 flash, Qwen qwen 3.8 flash, Google DeepMind gemini 3.7 flash, DeepSeek v4 flash vision all twelve objects were finished and signed off by the models themselves. tallest lighthouse is qwen's at 38.4 m, planted on the offshore stack with a bridge run out to it – the only model that read the site that way. deepseek signed off its bridge on an empty riverbed: 0 bricks, 107 minutes, $1.16m of material tallied - total cost, three builds #1 glm 5.3 flash – $0.201 #2 gemini 3.7 flash – $0.871 #3 qwen 3.8 flash – $1.058 #4 deepseek v4 flash – $1.567 - wall clock, three builds #1 gemini 3.7 flash – 91m #2 glm 5.3 flash – 228m #3 deepseek v4 flash – 502m #4 qwen 3.8 flash – 912m - total tokens #1 gemini 3.7 flash – 3,567,052 #2 glm 5.3 flash – 4,732,748 #3 qwen 3.8 flash – 13,469,333 #4 deepseek v4 flash – 18,230,076 - defects logged by the site #1 deepseek v4 flash – 59 #2 gemini 3.7 flash – 132 #3 glm 5.3 flash – 221 #4 qwen 3.8 flash – 350 - material tallied across three builds #1 gemini 3.7 flash – $359,884 #2 glm 5.3 flash – $583,358 #3 deepseek v4 flash – $1,327,484 #4 qwen 3.8 flash – $2,188,625 observations: • glm is the cheap one and nothing here is close – $0.201 for three buildings, $0.042 per million tokens, 6x under gemini's rate • what glm spends it on is bulk, not care: 166,228 bricks in one house and 156 defect weight, the worst single object in the set • gemini is the efficiency line – 91 minutes and 3.57m tokens for all three and an eighth of qwen's clock • gemini also builds the smallest of everything. its lighthouse is 22.5 m against qwen's 38.4, its house 6.9 m against 19.3 • qwen is the maximalist: 1.18m bricks, $2.19m of material, tallest on all three tasks, and 912 minutes – 15 hours – to get there conclusion: twelve finished objects for $3.80 all in, and a 7.8x price spread between the cheapest model and the priciest! follow thehype. for 24/7 ai news, analysis and breakdowns
1:09

glm 5.3 vs qwen 3.8 vs gemini 3.7 vs deepseek v4 flash four models designed and built three structures each on a physics-backed site, with no dimensions anywhere in the brief the setup: our own agent loop on OpenRouter, a construction site as the tool set – footings, walls, arches, roofs, scaffold, a lamp. the site enforces physics and nothing else: unsupported brick falls, a roof needs walls under it, a worker reaches 3.2 m above whatever he stands on, an arch needs centring until the keystone is set, concrete cures before it carries. no budget ceiling – material cost is tallied and reported, never blocked. tasks: 1. house – a plot and a palette, no plan. shape, height and material are the model's call 2. lighthouse – a headland cut by a gully, with a rock stack standing 30 m offshore. the lamp must burn, it must be the highest thing built, and the keeper must be able to walk to it 3. bridge – a river with one islet and banks at different heights. cross it however you want models: Z.ai glm 5.3 flash, Qwen qwen 3.8 flash, Google DeepMind gemini 3.7 flash, DeepSeek v4 flash vision all twelve objects were finished and signed off by the models themselves. tallest lighthouse is qwen's at 38.4 m, planted on the offshore stack with a bridge run out to it – the only model that read the site that way. deepseek signed off its bridge on an empty riverbed: 0 bricks, 107 minutes, $1.16m of material tallied - total cost, three builds #1 glm 5.3 flash – $0.201 #2 gemini 3.7 flash – $0.871 #3 qwen 3.8 flash – $1.058 #4 deepseek v4 flash – $1.567 - wall clock, three builds #1 gemini 3.7 flash – 91m #2 glm 5.3 flash – 228m #3 deepseek v4 flash – 502m #4 qwen 3.8 flash – 912m - total tokens #1 gemini 3.7 flash – 3,567,052 #2 glm 5.3 flash – 4,732,748 #3 qwen 3.8 flash – 13,469,333 #4 deepseek v4 flash – 18,230,076 - defects logged by the site #1 deepseek v4 flash – 59 #2 gemini 3.7 flash – 132 #3 glm 5.3 flash – 221 #4 qwen 3.8 flash – 350 - material tallied across three builds #1 gemini 3.7 flash – $359,884 #2 glm 5.3 flash – $583,358 #3 deepseek v4 flash – $1,327,484 #4 qwen 3.8 flash – $2,188,625 observations: • glm is the cheap one and nothing here is close – $0.201 for three buildings, $0.042 per million tokens, 6x under gemini's rate • what glm spends it on is bulk, not care: 166,228 bricks in one house and 156 defect weight, the worst single object in the set • gemini is the efficiency line – 91 minutes and 3.57m tokens for all three and an eighth of qwen's clock • gemini also builds the smallest of everything. its lighthouse is 22.5 m against qwen's 38.4, its house 6.9 m against 19.3 • qwen is the maximalist: 1.18m bricks, $2.19m of material, tallest on all three tasks, and 912 minutes – 15 hours – to get there conclusion: twelve finished objects for $3.80 all in, and a 7.8x price spread between the cheapest model and the priciest! follow thehype. for 24/7 ai news, analysis and breakdowns

thehype.

25,720 просмотров • 8 дней назад

DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs Gemini-3.6-Flash both given the exact same prompt to build 3D pirate ship Cost: > deepseek-v4-flash: $0.14 / $0.28 > gemini-3.6-flash: $1.50 / $7.50 though deepseek is 20x cheaper, gemini was surprising faster with the output Prompt used: "build a 3D model of pirate ship in Three js with minimal dashboard buttons in light theme background, with wide view of the pirate ship"
0:33

DeepSeek-V4-Flash vs Gemini-3.6-Flash both given the exact same prompt to build 3D pirate ship Cost: > deepseek-v4-flash: $0.14 / $0.28 > gemini-3.6-flash: $1.50 / $7.50 though deepseek is 20x cheaper, gemini was surprising faster with the output Prompt used: "build a 3D model of pirate ship in Three js with minimal dashboard buttons in light theme background, with wide view of the pirate ship"

Tim Jayas

20,127 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is our most cost-efficient Gemini 3 series model 🔦 Folks who are keen to experiment with it in Gemini CLI can do so with an API key and the -m flag. ❯ gemini -m gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview Official support for it in /model will be coming soon 🔜
0:43

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is our most cost-efficient Gemini 3 series model 🔦 Folks who are keen to experiment with it in Gemini CLI can do so with an API key and the -m flag. ❯ gemini -m gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview Official support for it in /model will be coming soon 🔜

Gemini CLI

66,826 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview is an amazing model. Google is literally winning. No stopping them now, this is not normal. Gemini 2.5 Flash is very cheap and super intelligent model. Intelligence too cheap to meter this is what it means. Thank you, Google.
0:34

Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview is an amazing model. Google is literally winning. No stopping them now, this is not normal. Gemini 2.5 Flash is very cheap and super intelligent model. Intelligence too cheap to meter this is what it means. Thank you, Google.

AshutoshShrivastava

154,366 просмотров • 1 год назад

We asked Gemini 3.5 Flash to bring back the classic early-2000s PC drawing experience, and it delivered in one shot. What are you building first with Canvas?
0:28

We asked Gemini 3.5 Flash to bring back the classic early-2000s PC drawing experience, and it delivered in one shot. What are you building first with Canvas?

Google Gemini

22,294,081 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Optimized for high-volume workloads, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is now available for agentic Android development. 😎 This is one of our fastest, most cost-efficient models yet. Start building through the Gemini API in Android Studio →
0:21

Optimized for high-volume workloads, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is now available for agentic Android development. 😎 This is one of our fastest, most cost-efficient models yet. Start building through the Gemini API in Android Studio →

Android Developers

29,093 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Gemini 3.5 Flash is a step forward for Google on speed and agentic capabilities but comes at a trade-off of being higher cost than prior models We have measured up to ~280 output tokens/sec, placing it on the speed/intelligence Pareto frontier and well ahead of Gemini 3 Flash. It also shows a major uplift on agentic tasks, reaching ~1650 ELO on GDPVal-AA. The trade-off: cost is up ~5x versus Gemini 3 Flash, driven by higher token prices (3x higher than Gemini 3 Flash) and higher token usage. In this video, Declan Jackson, Member of Technical Staff at Artificial Analysis, breaks it down.
1:57

Gemini 3.5 Flash is a step forward for Google on speed and agentic capabilities but comes at a trade-off of being higher cost than prior models We have measured up to ~280 output tokens/sec, placing it on the speed/intelligence Pareto frontier and well ahead of Gemini 3 Flash. It also shows a major uplift on agentic tasks, reaching ~1650 ELO on GDPVal-AA. The trade-off: cost is up ~5x versus Gemini 3 Flash, driven by higher token prices (3x higher than Gemini 3 Flash) and higher token usage. In this video, Declan Jackson, Member of Technical Staff at Artificial Analysis, breaks it down.

Artificial Analysis

16,055 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Today, we're introducing not one but TWO new models, striking the balance between efficiency and quality to enable you to build production AI agents. — Gemini 3.6 Flash: Addresses efficiency feedback we received from Gemini 3.5 Flash with upgrades in coding, knowledge work, and multimodal tasks faster, more accurately, and with substantially fewer tokens per task — Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: Our fastest, most cost-effective 3.5-class model yet built for agentic workflows, hitting ~350 output tokens/sec with improved coding and overall quality Start building with these today via the Gemini API in Google AI Studio or try them out in the Google Gemini
0:42

Today, we're introducing not one but TWO new models, striking the balance between efficiency and quality to enable you to build production AI agents. — Gemini 3.6 Flash: Addresses efficiency feedback we received from Gemini 3.5 Flash with upgrades in coding, knowledge work, and multimodal tasks faster, more accurately, and with substantially fewer tokens per task — Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: Our fastest, most cost-effective 3.5-class model yet built for agentic workflows, hitting ~350 output tokens/sec with improved coding and overall quality Start building with these today via the Gemini API in Google AI Studio or try them out in the Google Gemini

Google AI

438,102 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Gemini Omni Flash can add MAGIC to any video with a single text prompt! - maximum video length is 10 seconds - video output is 1280x720
0:22

Gemini Omni Flash can add MAGIC to any video with a single text prompt! - maximum video length is 10 seconds - video output is 1280x720

fal

18,720 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Gemini 3 flash is an amazing model...crazy what you can create in just one-shot ⚡
0:50

Gemini 3 flash is an amazing model...crazy what you can create in just one-shot ⚡

Shubham Saboo

65,594 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад