Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Geologist Gregg Braden challenges the mainstream climate narrative "Climate change is real — I've been saying it since 1979. But humans aren't the cause. CO2 is rising — yes. But over 90% comes from warming oceans (warm water releases gas), not human activity. The oceans are warming from BELOW... show more

Camus

403,603 subscribers

19,880 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik Bildung Wissenschaft & Technologie

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Professor Emeritus Dr. Ian Plimer calls it "the great CO2 fraud." For decades we have been told that human CO2 drives global warming but Plimer points out: "No one has ever demonstrated that human emissions drive temperature." Ice cores show the opposite of the narrative. "Temperature rises first," says Plimer, "and only centuries later does CO2 follow." For more than 200 years chemistry has shown that CO2 is the gas of life, not a pollutant and not a threat. The planet is far greener today because of higher atmospheric CO2 levels, and crop yields are breaking records. According to Plimer 'runaway warming' is not science, it is propaganda built on inversion and fear.

Professor Emeritus Dr. Ian Plimer calls it "the great CO2 fraud." For decades we have been told that human CO2 drives global warming but Plimer points out: "No one has ever demonstrated that human emissions drive temperature." Ice cores show the opposite of the narrative. "Temperature rises first," says Plimer, "and only centuries later does CO2 follow." For more than 200 years chemistry has shown that CO2 is the gas of life, not a pollutant and not a threat. The planet is far greener today because of higher atmospheric CO2 levels, and crop yields are breaking records. According to Plimer 'runaway warming' is not science, it is propaganda built on inversion and fear.

Electroverse

27,231 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

I guess Gregg Braden won’t be invited as a speaker to the United Nations ever again after saying this! Climate change is a fact, but humans are not causing it; it is the natural cyclical process of a geophysical event. The oceans are warming from underneath; Ethical Skeptic here on X has explained this process and its connection to the geomagnetic excursion! 'Nobody’s gonna listen anyway thread.' (1/8)🧵

I guess Gregg Braden won’t be invited as a speaker to the United Nations ever again after saying this! Climate change is a fact, but humans are not causing it; it is the natural cyclical process of a geophysical event. The oceans are warming from underneath; Ethical Skeptic here on X has explained this process and its connection to the geomagnetic excursion! 'Nobody’s gonna listen anyway thread.' (1/8)🧵

Open Minded Approach

187,046 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

New research claims human emissions are not driving atmospheric CO2. A paper by Dai Ato ran multiple linear regressions for 1959 to 2022, testing two predictors of the annual CO2 increase: sea surface temperature and human emissions. The result was clear: when the oceans warmed, CO2 levels rose almost exactly in step - about two to three parts per million for every one degree Celsius of warming. Adding human emissions to the model didn't change the outcome. Using only ocean temperature, the model reproduced global CO2 levels with near-perfect accuracy - a correlation of 0.995 and an error of just one to two ppm by 2022. The main factor governing the annual increase in atmospheric CO2 concentration is sea surface temperature rather than human emissions. Earlier studies have shown the same pattern. Temperature changes first, CO2 follows. If Ato is correct, cutting human emissions won't lower atmospheric CO2 because it's the oceans that set the pace.

New research claims human emissions are not driving atmospheric CO2. A paper by Dai Ato ran multiple linear regressions for 1959 to 2022, testing two predictors of the annual CO2 increase: sea surface temperature and human emissions. The result was clear: when the oceans warmed, CO2 levels rose almost exactly in step - about two to three parts per million for every one degree Celsius of warming. Adding human emissions to the model didn't change the outcome. Using only ocean temperature, the model reproduced global CO2 levels with near-perfect accuracy - a correlation of 0.995 and an error of just one to two ppm by 2022. The main factor governing the annual increase in atmospheric CO2 concentration is sea surface temperature rather than human emissions. Earlier studies have shown the same pattern. Temperature changes first, CO2 follows. If Ato is correct, cutting human emissions won't lower atmospheric CO2 because it's the oceans that set the pace.

Electroverse

214,036 Aufrufe • vor 23 Tagen

"We're not in a crisis. There is no climate emergency." Geologist, Professor Ian Plimer: "It has never been proven that human emissions of carbon dioxide drive global warming." "Only 3% of emissions are from humans, the rest is natural... So if you're to prove that humans, and their emissions of the the gas of life, change climate, then you also have to prove that the natural emissions—97% of all emissions—don't change climate. That has never been addressed."

"We're not in a crisis. There is no climate emergency." Geologist, Professor Ian Plimer: "It has never been proven that human emissions of carbon dioxide drive global warming." "Only 3% of emissions are from humans, the rest is natural... So if you're to prove that humans, and their emissions of the the gas of life, change climate, then you also have to prove that the natural emissions—97% of all emissions—don't change climate. That has never been addressed."

Wide Awake Media

234,182 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Award-winning journalist Alex Newman delivers a PERFECT 90 second summary of the climate scam: "The notion that CO2 is pollution is absolutely preposterous... The idea that [it's] going to destroy the planet or change the temperature of the Earth is totally ludicrous." "But from a totalitarian perspective, if you can convince people that CO2 is pollution, there's no human activity that doesn't result in CO2 emissions, including living, including dying, turning on a light switch." "Every single aspect of your life, then, if we submit to the idea that CO2 is pollution, then comes under the regulatory control of the people who claim to be saving us from pollution." Credit: Alex Newman

Award-winning journalist Alex Newman delivers a PERFECT 90 second summary of the climate scam: "The notion that CO2 is pollution is absolutely preposterous... The idea that [it's] going to destroy the planet or change the temperature of the Earth is totally ludicrous." "But from a totalitarian perspective, if you can convince people that CO2 is pollution, there's no human activity that doesn't result in CO2 emissions, including living, including dying, turning on a light switch." "Every single aspect of your life, then, if we submit to the idea that CO2 is pollution, then comes under the regulatory control of the people who claim to be saving us from pollution." Credit: Alex Newman

Wide Awake Media

1,518,395 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Neil Oliver exposes the so-called "climate crisis" as a manufactured hoax, arguing it’s a multi-front war against reason. He points out that global temperatures began rising just as accurate records started—coinciding with Earth’s recovery from the Little Ice Age, a period of extreme cold. "They began measuring at the bottom of a deep well," Oliver says, suggesting warming was inevitable, not alarming. He tackles the demonization of CO2, calling it "plant food" essential for life. At roughly 400 parts per million, atmospheric CO2 is near a critical low. Below 300 ppm, green life collapses—no plants, no animals, no food. Oliver notes that CO2 levels were once in the thousands of ppm, sustaining lush ecosystems. Rising CO2, he argues, greens the planet, citing the Sahara’s ancient verdancy as evidence it wasn’t always a desert. Oliver dismisses the climate narrative as "bogus," driven by profiteers. He highlights Al Gore, whose wealth reportedly grew from a few million to $300 million while championing climate alarmism. "It’s a money-making scheme," Oliver asserts, comparing climate activism to a "carriage on the gravy train." He accuses elites of exploiting the cause for personal gain, entering politics "skinny like worms" and emerging "fat." The climate hoax, Oliver concludes, thrives on distorted science and greed, not truth.

Neil Oliver exposes the so-called "climate crisis" as a manufactured hoax, arguing it’s a multi-front war against reason. He points out that global temperatures began rising just as accurate records started—coinciding with Earth’s recovery from the Little Ice Age, a period of extreme cold. "They began measuring at the bottom of a deep well," Oliver says, suggesting warming was inevitable, not alarming. He tackles the demonization of CO2, calling it "plant food" essential for life. At roughly 400 parts per million, atmospheric CO2 is near a critical low. Below 300 ppm, green life collapses—no plants, no animals, no food. Oliver notes that CO2 levels were once in the thousands of ppm, sustaining lush ecosystems. Rising CO2, he argues, greens the planet, citing the Sahara’s ancient verdancy as evidence it wasn’t always a desert. Oliver dismisses the climate narrative as "bogus," driven by profiteers. He highlights Al Gore, whose wealth reportedly grew from a few million to $300 million while championing climate alarmism. "It’s a money-making scheme," Oliver asserts, comparing climate activism to a "carriage on the gravy train." He accuses elites of exploiting the cause for personal gain, entering politics "skinny like worms" and emerging "fat." The climate hoax, Oliver concludes, thrives on distorted science and greed, not truth.

Camus

12,879 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

MUST-WATCH: Contrary to propaganda spouted by climate alarmists, rising temperatures are the CAUSE of increased atmospheric CO2, not the other way around, and the temperature of the Earth is regulated by solar activity. The climate has always changed, long before humans got here, and it will continue to change long after we're gone, but globalist bodies like the UN and WEF want us to believe that humans are causing it, as a pretext to exert absolute totalitarian control over the entire planet. From the documentary, ‘The Great Global Warming Swindle’. Watch the full documentary here: For more content like this, visit: #ClimateScam #NetZero

MUST-WATCH: Contrary to propaganda spouted by climate alarmists, rising temperatures are the CAUSE of increased atmospheric CO2, not the other way around, and the temperature of the Earth is regulated by solar activity. The climate has always changed, long before humans got here, and it will continue to change long after we're gone, but globalist bodies like the UN and WEF want us to believe that humans are causing it, as a pretext to exert absolute totalitarian control over the entire planet. From the documentary, ‘The Great Global Warming Swindle’. Watch the full documentary here: For more content like this, visit: #ClimateScam #NetZero

Wide Awake Media

739,877 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

Global warming? There is a clear global warming especially in the last 45 years, with 2023-2024 being the warmest years on satellite records. However, the current global temperature is not warm. It is only ~1.2°C higher than in 1850, one of the coldest years in the last 10,000 years. And the current climate is one of the coldest of the last 485 million years. Global warming is primarily driven by natural cycles. Humans are not the control factor. There is no man-made climate crisis. This is my usual compendium with automatic audio using a text-to-audio AI application. It still needs to improve, but it's already quite acceptable!

Global warming? There is a clear global warming especially in the last 45 years, with 2023-2024 being the warmest years on satellite records. However, the current global temperature is not warm. It is only ~1.2°C higher than in 1850, one of the coldest years in the last 10,000 years. And the current climate is one of the coldest of the last 485 million years. Global warming is primarily driven by natural cycles. Humans are not the control factor. There is no man-made climate crisis. This is my usual compendium with automatic audio using a text-to-audio AI application. It still needs to improve, but it's already quite acceptable!

JOSE GEFAELL

18,902 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Scientific Bombshell Shatters the Climate Change Narrative A groundbreaking new study has found that CO2 "may have little to no further warming effect" on the Earth's atmosphere. The striking finding that made the authors come to this conclusion is the fact that the Earth's atmosphere already contains over 6 kg/m² of CO2, which is ten times the "saturation mass" needed for the gas to absorb radiation. This means that additional CO2 emissions might not significantly increase global temperatures, as the atmosphere has already absorbed nearly all the heat it can within the CO2 spectrum. The study, titled “Climatic consequences of the process of saturation of radiation absorption in gases,” was published in Applications in Engineering Science. These findings support the argument made by independent researchers like Randall Carlson, who actually claims that CO2 comes with many benefits, such as boosting plant growth and crop yields. He says, “Hundreds of studies have consistently demonstrated significant improvements in plant growth, crop yields, and drought resistance under elevated CO2 conditions.” This latest study aligns with what Carlson has been saying all along and is absolutely devastating for the climate change narrative.

Scientific Bombshell Shatters the Climate Change Narrative A groundbreaking new study has found that CO2 "may have little to no further warming effect" on the Earth's atmosphere. The striking finding that made the authors come to this conclusion is the fact that the Earth's atmosphere already contains over 6 kg/m² of CO2, which is ten times the "saturation mass" needed for the gas to absorb radiation. This means that additional CO2 emissions might not significantly increase global temperatures, as the atmosphere has already absorbed nearly all the heat it can within the CO2 spectrum. The study, titled “Climatic consequences of the process of saturation of radiation absorption in gases,” was published in Applications in Engineering Science. These findings support the argument made by independent researchers like Randall Carlson, who actually claims that CO2 comes with many benefits, such as boosting plant growth and crop yields. He says, “Hundreds of studies have consistently demonstrated significant improvements in plant growth, crop yields, and drought resistance under elevated CO2 conditions.” This latest study aligns with what Carlson has been saying all along and is absolutely devastating for the climate change narrative.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

437,820 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Dr. Michael Yeadon Exposes the Foundational Lie of Climate Alarmism What if everything you’ve been told about climate change is not just exaggerated, but a deliberate, orchestrated lie? Former Pfizer VP & Chief Scientist Dr. Michael Yeadon delivers a stunning, evidence-based takedown of the climate change narrative that will make you question everything. He begins by tracing the origins. “If you do nothing else, have a look at the Club of Rome, the Trilateral Commission,” Dr. Yeadon states. “Honestly, things like climate change and pandemic diseases were decided to be used by people concerned about population... They decided at the same time to frighten you with diseases and changes to climate. It's the same group of people at the same time. And after that, there was a diaspora of propaganda.” But what about the science? Dr. Yeadon, an expert in parsing complex data, did his own research. “I found at least three or four people who've spent longer in atmospheric science than I've spent in pharma R&D. And there is no question that there is no significant change to the climate since pre-industrial times.” He dismantles the core data itself. “Where do you think they got the temperature data from when there were virtually no thermometers? They weren't calibrated. No one checked the records. This idea that they know it's 1.5 degrees warmer? It's a lie.” Then, he goes for the jugular: the alleged link between CO2 and temperature. “There is no connection between CO2 in the air and the temperature of the surface... We don't live in a greenhouse. A greenhouse is a closed system. Our atmosphere is open; energy radiates back into space.” The proof? Ice core data. “What several independent groups all show is that changes in temperature ALWAYS preceded change in atmospheric CO2. CO2 moves in response to temperature. Warm water holds less CO2. Everyone knows a warm fizzy drink goes flat. It’s basic science.” His conclusion is unequivocal: “When the Earth warms due to changes in solar output or orbital cycles, the CO2 movement takes place afterwards. All of this fear-mongering about burning fossil fuels adding CO2 and changing the climate? It is a lie. They're lying to you to frighten you and to get you to accept restrictions on your life.” This isn’t a conspiracy theory. It’s a call for intellectual honesty from a renowned scientist. It’s time to stop being frightened by a crisis that doesn’t exist. Share if you’re ready to question the narrative. Follow for more unflinching analysis from world-class experts.

Dr. Michael Yeadon Exposes the Foundational Lie of Climate Alarmism What if everything you’ve been told about climate change is not just exaggerated, but a deliberate, orchestrated lie? Former Pfizer VP & Chief Scientist Dr. Michael Yeadon delivers a stunning, evidence-based takedown of the climate change narrative that will make you question everything. He begins by tracing the origins. “If you do nothing else, have a look at the Club of Rome, the Trilateral Commission,” Dr. Yeadon states. “Honestly, things like climate change and pandemic diseases were decided to be used by people concerned about population... They decided at the same time to frighten you with diseases and changes to climate. It's the same group of people at the same time. And after that, there was a diaspora of propaganda.” But what about the science? Dr. Yeadon, an expert in parsing complex data, did his own research. “I found at least three or four people who've spent longer in atmospheric science than I've spent in pharma R&D. And there is no question that there is no significant change to the climate since pre-industrial times.” He dismantles the core data itself. “Where do you think they got the temperature data from when there were virtually no thermometers? They weren't calibrated. No one checked the records. This idea that they know it's 1.5 degrees warmer? It's a lie.” Then, he goes for the jugular: the alleged link between CO2 and temperature. “There is no connection between CO2 in the air and the temperature of the surface... We don't live in a greenhouse. A greenhouse is a closed system. Our atmosphere is open; energy radiates back into space.” The proof? Ice core data. “What several independent groups all show is that changes in temperature ALWAYS preceded change in atmospheric CO2. CO2 moves in response to temperature. Warm water holds less CO2. Everyone knows a warm fizzy drink goes flat. It’s basic science.” His conclusion is unequivocal: “When the Earth warms due to changes in solar output or orbital cycles, the CO2 movement takes place afterwards. All of this fear-mongering about burning fossil fuels adding CO2 and changing the climate? It is a lie. They're lying to you to frighten you and to get you to accept restrictions on your life.” This isn’t a conspiracy theory. It’s a call for intellectual honesty from a renowned scientist. It’s time to stop being frightened by a crisis that doesn’t exist. Share if you’re ready to question the narrative. Follow for more unflinching analysis from world-class experts.

Camus

20,811 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Professor Emeritus Dr. Ian Plimer: The Great CO₂ Fraud Dr. Ian Plimer dismantles the core myth of climate alarmism — that human emissions of carbon dioxide drive global warming. He argues that no one has ever demonstrated this causal link. If CO₂ truly drove temperature, then why do the 97% of natural emissions not cause the same effect? Plimer calls it what it is: a scientific fraud from day one. For over two centuries, chemistry has shown that CO₂ is the “gas of life,” not a pollutant or planet-killer. Ice core records reveal that temperature rises first, and only centuries later, CO₂ levels follow — proving the inverse of the mainstream narrative. According to Plimer, the story of “runaway global warming” is not science — it’s propaganda built on inversion and fear.

Professor Emeritus Dr. Ian Plimer: The Great CO₂ Fraud Dr. Ian Plimer dismantles the core myth of climate alarmism — that human emissions of carbon dioxide drive global warming. He argues that no one has ever demonstrated this causal link. If CO₂ truly drove temperature, then why do the 97% of natural emissions not cause the same effect? Plimer calls it what it is: a scientific fraud from day one. For over two centuries, chemistry has shown that CO₂ is the “gas of life,” not a pollutant or planet-killer. Ice core records reveal that temperature rises first, and only centuries later, CO₂ levels follow — proving the inverse of the mainstream narrative. According to Plimer, the story of “runaway global warming” is not science — it’s propaganda built on inversion and fear.

Camus

19,003 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

I asked Erik Erik Bernhardsson why high CO2 levels in your office are such a big deal: "I'm not a health nut. But one of the things I've been radicalized on is CO2 levels. There's a real relationship between CO2 levels, productivity, and cognitive performance. And CO2 levels are usually way too high in offices and schools. Normal air CO2 levels are 300-500 PPM. In offices it often hits 1,000 or 2,000. Airplanes can get up to 2,500. You start getting brain damage at 5,000. So I went and bought a bunch of CO2 monitors for the office. And I look at them every day. And I open windows anytime we get too high."

I asked Erik Erik Bernhardsson why high CO2 levels in your office are such a big deal: "I'm not a health nut. But one of the things I've been radicalized on is CO2 levels. There's a real relationship between CO2 levels, productivity, and cognitive performance. And CO2 levels are usually way too high in offices and schools. Normal air CO2 levels are 300-500 PPM. In offices it often hits 1,000 or 2,000. Airplanes can get up to 2,500. You start getting brain damage at 5,000. So I went and bought a bunch of CO2 monitors for the office. And I look at them every day. And I open windows anytime we get too high."

The Peel

107,531 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Media Blackout: 10 Stories They Chose to Not Tell You This Week #10 - Mainstream journalists inadvertently reveal the shocking truth about climate change. Whoopsie. The Washington Post just published a jaw-dropping report about global warming, and “a funny thing happened” that they weren't expecting. The report revealed that the “Earth’s temperatures have been sliding for 50 million years.” In fact, today's average temperature of 58.96°F (14.98°C) is about 38 degrees cooler than the 96.8°F (36°C) average temperature from around 100 million years ago. This completely destroys the mainstream narrative that we are on the brink of a global heating catastrophe. And contrary to common belief, Rep. Thomas Massie says that we actually “need more CO2” because it's associated with plant life “doing better” and crop production going up. Everywhere you turn, the climate change narrative screams “scam.” Watch Dr. William Happer, PhD, expose the truth about it all in our exclusive interview. See more revealing stories in the thread below 🧵

Media Blackout: 10 Stories They Chose to Not Tell You This Week #10 - Mainstream journalists inadvertently reveal the shocking truth about climate change. Whoopsie. The Washington Post just published a jaw-dropping report about global warming, and “a funny thing happened” that they weren't expecting. The report revealed that the “Earth’s temperatures have been sliding for 50 million years.” In fact, today's average temperature of 58.96°F (14.98°C) is about 38 degrees cooler than the 96.8°F (36°C) average temperature from around 100 million years ago. This completely destroys the mainstream narrative that we are on the brink of a global heating catastrophe. And contrary to common belief, Rep. Thomas Massie says that we actually “need more CO2” because it's associated with plant life “doing better” and crop production going up. Everywhere you turn, the climate change narrative screams “scam.” Watch Dr. William Happer, PhD, expose the truth about it all in our exclusive interview. See more revealing stories in the thread below 🧵

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,676,137 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

After years of cashing in on climate fear through renewables, fake meat and carbon schemes, Bill Gates is quietly changing his tune. In 2021, Gates warned that climate change would erase coastlines, kill millions and make outdoor life impossible. Now, he says the planet will cope just fine. But this was always the case... Satellite data show a greener planet with CO2 feeding more vegetation. The Lancet confirms cold kills at least 9X more people than heat. And studies point to reduced cloud cover, not CO2, as the main cause of recent warming. Great Barrier Reef coral cover is at record highs. And so too are polar bear populations. The climate didn't collapse. The narrative did.

After years of cashing in on climate fear through renewables, fake meat and carbon schemes, Bill Gates is quietly changing his tune. In 2021, Gates warned that climate change would erase coastlines, kill millions and make outdoor life impossible. Now, he says the planet will cope just fine. But this was always the case... Satellite data show a greener planet with CO2 feeding more vegetation. The Lancet confirms cold kills at least 9X more people than heat. And studies point to reduced cloud cover, not CO2, as the main cause of recent warming. Great Barrier Reef coral cover is at record highs. And so too are polar bear populations. The climate didn't collapse. The narrative did.

Electroverse

18,558 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Dr. Patrick Moore, co-founder of Greenpeace: "There are three things you need to know to know that [the climate crisis] is false." "First, it is not too hot now. It is one of the coldest periods in the history of the Earth." "Second, CO2 is lower now in the atmosphere than it has been throughout nearly the entire history of the Earth." "The third thing you need to know is that all the CO2 that we are putting into the atmosphere, where did it come from? How did it get in the fossil fuels? By plants pulling it out of the atmosphere, and the oceans. The plankton in the sea, the vegetation on the land, turned into coal, oil and gas." "So all we're doing is replacing carbon dioxide... If there wasn't enough CO2 for the plants, we would all die too... We are replenishing the CO2 to a much better level than it had gone down to. We are the actual salvation of life on Earth." Credit: Patrick Moore Cristian 🇯🇵🇮🇹

Dr. Patrick Moore, co-founder of Greenpeace: "There are three things you need to know to know that [the climate crisis] is false." "First, it is not too hot now. It is one of the coldest periods in the history of the Earth." "Second, CO2 is lower now in the atmosphere than it has been throughout nearly the entire history of the Earth." "The third thing you need to know is that all the CO2 that we are putting into the atmosphere, where did it come from? How did it get in the fossil fuels? By plants pulling it out of the atmosphere, and the oceans. The plankton in the sea, the vegetation on the land, turned into coal, oil and gas." "So all we're doing is replacing carbon dioxide... If there wasn't enough CO2 for the plants, we would all die too... We are replenishing the CO2 to a much better level than it had gone down to. We are the actual salvation of life on Earth." Credit: Patrick Moore Cristian 🇯🇵🇮🇹

Wide Awake Media

1,151,995 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Joe Rogan Destroys the Climate Change Narrative in Under 3 Minutes “This idea that the whole thing is based on carbon emissions from human beings is total bullsh*t. It’s not true.” Rogan’s guest, Mel Gibson, was shocked to learn that Earth’s climate has always been changing—even long before humans existed. Rogan talked about data from millions of years ago that show Earth’s temperature has gone up and down naturally over time. “There’s no static temperature of Earth ever,” he said. “There’s never been a time where it keeps the same temperature, and then humans came along and ruined everything. That is just not real.” So why all the fear-mongering? It turns out that there are a lot of financial and political benefits to scaring the sh*t out of people. “The problem with anything is that once a narrative gets established and then there’s a profit attached to the solution to that narrative. Yes. And that’s green energy and green energy bills and there’s businesses that are wrapped around there. “And then there’s also this fear that they love to pump into people about climate change that, you know, they terrify the sh*t out of young people that we’re going to destroy the world and climate change. You must act now. And then you become beholden to the political party that it’s espousing these ideas and then your enemy is the deniers of this science, even though you don’t even understand the science,” Rogan explained.

Joe Rogan Destroys the Climate Change Narrative in Under 3 Minutes “This idea that the whole thing is based on carbon emissions from human beings is total bullsht. It’s not true.” Rogan’s guest, Mel Gibson, was shocked to learn that Earth’s climate has always been changing—even long before humans existed. Rogan talked about data from millions of years ago that show Earth’s temperature has gone up and down naturally over time. “There’s no static temperature of Earth ever,” he said. “There’s never been a time where it keeps the same temperature, and then humans came along and ruined everything. That is just not real.” So why all the fear-mongering? It turns out that there are a lot of financial and political benefits to scaring the sht out of people. “The problem with anything is that once a narrative gets established and then there’s a profit attached to the solution to that narrative. Yes. And that’s green energy and green energy bills and there’s businesses that are wrapped around there. “And then there’s also this fear that they love to pump into people about climate change that, you know, they terrify the sh*t out of young people that we’re going to destroy the world and climate change. You must act now. And then you become beholden to the political party that it’s espousing these ideas and then your enemy is the deniers of this science, even though you don’t even understand the science,” Rogan explained.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

928,994 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Time to tell the truth about the real science. The science behind “climate change” is false. As I point out in this speech the amount of energy absorbed by CO2 is incredibly small and is quickly lost via convection (the wind) through the force of gravity. The idea that one CO2 molecule can heat up 10,000 N2 and O2 molecules by 1 degree and then maintain that increase in temperature is false. Assuming equal molecule weights that would require that the CO2 molecule is 10,000 degrees in order to confirm with Newton’s third law of motion or the 1st law of thermodynamics. This is clearly impossible. The temperature of the Sun is 5,700 degrees and the heat inside an internal combustion engine of a space ship is 3,000 degrees. Furthermore gases are terrible conductors of heat so it’s very difficult for gas to transfer heat to other molecules. This science of physics and in particular thermodynamics isn’t being taught in schools. It is allowing the climate alarmists to spread their false narrative about climate change which is being used to waste tens of billions of dollars on renewables which in itself is destroying our environment. Only People First has the technical understanding of the true science of heat - thermodynamics- to destroy the climate debate once and for all.

Time to tell the truth about the real science. The science behind “climate change” is false. As I point out in this speech the amount of energy absorbed by CO2 is incredibly small and is quickly lost via convection (the wind) through the force of gravity. The idea that one CO2 molecule can heat up 10,000 N2 and O2 molecules by 1 degree and then maintain that increase in temperature is false. Assuming equal molecule weights that would require that the CO2 molecule is 10,000 degrees in order to confirm with Newton’s third law of motion or the 1st law of thermodynamics. This is clearly impossible. The temperature of the Sun is 5,700 degrees and the heat inside an internal combustion engine of a space ship is 3,000 degrees. Furthermore gases are terrible conductors of heat so it’s very difficult for gas to transfer heat to other molecules. This science of physics and in particular thermodynamics isn’t being taught in schools. It is allowing the climate alarmists to spread their false narrative about climate change which is being used to waste tens of billions of dollars on renewables which in itself is destroying our environment. Only People First has the technical understanding of the true science of heat - thermodynamics- to destroy the climate debate once and for all.

Senator Gerard Rennick

89,361 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

“There’s a doomsday view of climate change,” said Bill Gates on Tuesday. “Fortunately for all of us, this view is wrong….People will be able to live and thrive in most places on Earth for the foreseeable future. Emissions projections have gone down, and with the right policies and investments, innovation will allow us to drive emissions down much further.” In truth, Gates significantly understates just how wrong the doomsday problem is, says one of the world’s most influential climate scientists. “The weakest part of the argument has always been that warming is dangerous,” says Judy Curry, professor emerita at Georgia Tech University, in a new podcast with me. “It isn’t really. More people die from the cold than the heat. So this is probably a net benefit globally. Where’s the danger here?” Some climate scientists say Curry is a global warming denier, hasn’t done the research that they have done, and participated in a Trump administration misinformation effort. But Curry recognizes that the Earth is warming and that humans are contributing. Curry points out that “the modern warming started in the mid-19th century, somewhere between 1820 and 1860, following the end of the Little Ice Age. We’ve been warming since then. Nothing particularly surprising or unusual in my opinion. Is increasing CO₂ contributing to that? Yes.” The fact that warming has been beneficial “doesn’t mean that we should ignore the problem” she stresses and “doesn’t mean that we should keep pouring junk into the atmosphere. And Curry’s qualifications are exemplary. She frequently testifies before Congress and was one of five American scientists who conducted an independent review of climate science for the Department of Energy. And has done significantly more climate research than many of her critics. “I’m the one who’s done more climate dynamics research,” she noted. In truth, scientists have for decades been exaggerating the human impact compared to what nature does. When asked what percentage of the warming she would ascribe to humans, Curry said, “I would say I wouldn’t go much more than 50%.” Curry says, “We’ve mischaracterized the contributions from the sun and also from internal variability of the large-scale ocean circulation.” As a result, she said, “We cannot control the climate. There’s a whole lot of complicated processes going on in the climate system that have been oversimplified or ignored and fall broadly under the rubric of natural climate variability.” Curry notes that science supporting the benefits of additional carbon dioxide and warming is strong and not in dispute. “There are lots of benefits in terms of agricultural productivity, greening of the planet, fewer cold events, more rain in certain regions that with high populations that could use it,” said Curry. We discussed the criticisms of her and four colleagues who wrote the independent review of climate science commissioned by the Trump administration. “They say, ‘Oh, it’s not just CO₂, it’s also warmer temperatures and more rainfall,’” she said, referring to one of the criticisms by other scientists in Carbon Brief. “‘Aren’t you telling us that’s also caused by CO₂?’ So I don’t get what the gripe is. We’re gone through that section and added some updated references, but the fundamental story is unchanged.” As I documented at length at Forbes in 2019, in Apocalypse Never in 2020, and here at Public since 2021, including earlier this week, climate scientists, activists, and journalists have grossly exaggerated climate change to such an extent that much of what they say today must be considered disinformation, in that they know they are leaving the public with false ideas. “Global greening gets very short shrift in the [United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change] IPCC report,” she notes. “They don’t talk about the reduction in mortality from reduced number of cold events. They only talk about the mortality from heat events. It’s part of the rules – we’re only talking about dangerous human-caused climate change, not about any benefits from human cause.” But what is the reason for this? What explains why the scientific community has misled the public about the nature of the problem for so long? Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning investigative reporting, read the full article, and listen to the entire podcast! FULL VIDEO AND ARTICLE CLICK BELOW

“There’s a doomsday view of climate change,” said Bill Gates on Tuesday. “Fortunately for all of us, this view is wrong….People will be able to live and thrive in most places on Earth for the foreseeable future. Emissions projections have gone down, and with the right policies and investments, innovation will allow us to drive emissions down much further.” In truth, Gates significantly understates just how wrong the doomsday problem is, says one of the world’s most influential climate scientists. “The weakest part of the argument has always been that warming is dangerous,” says Judy Curry, professor emerita at Georgia Tech University, in a new podcast with me. “It isn’t really. More people die from the cold than the heat. So this is probably a net benefit globally. Where’s the danger here?” Some climate scientists say Curry is a global warming denier, hasn’t done the research that they have done, and participated in a Trump administration misinformation effort. But Curry recognizes that the Earth is warming and that humans are contributing. Curry points out that “the modern warming started in the mid-19th century, somewhere between 1820 and 1860, following the end of the Little Ice Age. We’ve been warming since then. Nothing particularly surprising or unusual in my opinion. Is increasing CO₂ contributing to that? Yes.” The fact that warming has been beneficial “doesn’t mean that we should ignore the problem” she stresses and “doesn’t mean that we should keep pouring junk into the atmosphere. And Curry’s qualifications are exemplary. She frequently testifies before Congress and was one of five American scientists who conducted an independent review of climate science for the Department of Energy. And has done significantly more climate research than many of her critics. “I’m the one who’s done more climate dynamics research,” she noted. In truth, scientists have for decades been exaggerating the human impact compared to what nature does. When asked what percentage of the warming she would ascribe to humans, Curry said, “I would say I wouldn’t go much more than 50%.” Curry says, “We’ve mischaracterized the contributions from the sun and also from internal variability of the large-scale ocean circulation.” As a result, she said, “We cannot control the climate. There’s a whole lot of complicated processes going on in the climate system that have been oversimplified or ignored and fall broadly under the rubric of natural climate variability.” Curry notes that science supporting the benefits of additional carbon dioxide and warming is strong and not in dispute. “There are lots of benefits in terms of agricultural productivity, greening of the planet, fewer cold events, more rain in certain regions that with high populations that could use it,” said Curry. We discussed the criticisms of her and four colleagues who wrote the independent review of climate science commissioned by the Trump administration. “They say, ‘Oh, it’s not just CO₂, it’s also warmer temperatures and more rainfall,’” she said, referring to one of the criticisms by other scientists in Carbon Brief. “‘Aren’t you telling us that’s also caused by CO₂?’ So I don’t get what the gripe is. We’re gone through that section and added some updated references, but the fundamental story is unchanged.” As I documented at length at Forbes in 2019, in Apocalypse Never in 2020, and here at Public since 2021, including earlier this week, climate scientists, activists, and journalists have grossly exaggerated climate change to such an extent that much of what they say today must be considered disinformation, in that they know they are leaving the public with false ideas. “Global greening gets very short shrift in the [United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change] IPCC report,” she notes. “They don’t talk about the reduction in mortality from reduced number of cold events. They only talk about the mortality from heat events. It’s part of the rules – we’re only talking about dangerous human-caused climate change, not about any benefits from human cause.” But what is the reason for this? What explains why the scientific community has misled the public about the nature of the problem for so long? Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning investigative reporting, read the full article, and listen to the entire podcast! FULL VIDEO AND ARTICLE CLICK BELOW

Michael Shellenberger

66,361 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Journalist Alex Newman provides a flawless 90-second overview of the climate agenda: "The notion that CO₂ is pollution is absolutely preposterous... The idea that [it's] going to destroy the planet or change the temperature of the Earth is totally ludicrous." "But from a totalitarian perspective, if you can convince people that CO₂ is pollution, there's no human activity that doesn't result in CO₂ emissions—including living, including dying, turning on a light switch." "Every single aspect of your life, then, if we submit to the idea that CO₂ is pollution, then comes under the regulatory control of the people who claim to be saving us from pollution."

Journalist Alex Newman provides a flawless 90-second overview of the climate agenda: "The notion that CO₂ is pollution is absolutely preposterous... The idea that [it's] going to destroy the planet or change the temperature of the Earth is totally ludicrous." "But from a totalitarian perspective, if you can convince people that CO₂ is pollution, there's no human activity that doesn't result in CO₂ emissions—including living, including dying, turning on a light switch." "Every single aspect of your life, then, if we submit to the idea that CO₂ is pollution, then comes under the regulatory control of the people who claim to be saving us from pollution."

Wide Awake Media

279,623 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr