正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Ghazipur case: There’s a difference between questioning the system and using a tragedy for mileage. SP seems to have blurred that line. When even the victim’s father points it out, it exposes how hollow that approach is. A crime happened, the system quickly reacted, an FIR was filed, the... show more

THE SKIN DOCTOR

899,761 subscribers

41,105 次观看 • 3 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

喜剧新闻政治教育

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Bernie Sanders Just Explained Why Trump Won—and It Actually Makes Sense “When you talk about people losing faith in the American political system, it’s justified because you have a corrupt campaign finance system.” “He [Trump] was elected president, I think, because many, many millions of people are looking at the economic and political system in America and understand that it is not working for them.” He says that the system is rigged from both sides—that Democrats and Republicans controlled by billionaire donors and corporate interests. Continuing with the message, Sanders argued that the American people are right to feel frustrated because what we’re living under isn’t a real democracy. “People have a right to be angry.”

Bernie Sanders Just Explained Why Trump Won—and It Actually Makes Sense “When you talk about people losing faith in the American political system, it’s justified because you have a corrupt campaign finance system.” “He [Trump] was elected president, I think, because many, many millions of people are looking at the economic and political system in America and understand that it is not working for them.” He says that the system is rigged from both sides—that Democrats and Republicans controlled by billionaire donors and corporate interests. Continuing with the message, Sanders argued that the American people are right to feel frustrated because what we’re living under isn’t a real democracy. “People have a right to be angry.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

594,771 次观看 • 1 年前

"It was a tribute to The Stooges, the MC5 and punk rock. We smashed it when we used to play it live. I love the quitar solo and the drop down in the middle. Alan McGee obsessed over the line about being the underclass and wanted that to be the first single. For my part, all those songs that have a political undercurrent are real because I was iust writing them from the heart. At that point I was unemploved, in rented accommodation trying to make it in the world, living from one week to the next, not knowing if you're gonna have enough money for a pizza. You are in a political situation even if vou don't realise it, cos that is the battleqround, that is the essence of politics: accommodation, food and trying to make a living." - Noel Gallagher #Oasis

"It was a tribute to The Stooges, the MC5 and punk rock. We smashed it when we used to play it live. I love the quitar solo and the drop down in the middle. Alan McGee obsessed over the line about being the underclass and wanted that to be the first single. For my part, all those songs that have a political undercurrent are real because I was iust writing them from the heart. At that point I was unemploved, in rented accommodation trying to make it in the world, living from one week to the next, not knowing if you're gonna have enough money for a pizza. You are in a political situation even if vou don't realise it, cos that is the battleqround, that is the essence of politics: accommodation, food and trying to make a living." - Noel Gallagher #Oasis

Liam Gallagher Daily

36,290 次观看 • 6 个月前

#WATCH | Dhaula Kuan BMW accident | Delhi: Counsel for accused Gaganpreet Kaur, Advocate Vikas Pahwa, "... We read the FIR, which was registered 10 hours after the incident. The incident happened at 1.30 pm and an FIR was filed at 11.30 pm...The information in the FIR contradicts the press conference... It seems incorrect... If someone dies because of rash and negligent driving, then it is a bailable offence. If someone tries to turn it into a non-bailable offence by adding certain sections, it is unfortunate. The DCP stated that the accident happened when the car crashed at a very sharp turn. When the accident happened at a sharp turn, the forward portion of the car crashed first. Two people on a two-wheeler were hit and slammed into a DTC bus... As per the CCTV, it was not provided in the court... The accused, her husband and their children were still in the car. Their airbags also opened, and they are also injured. This is not the case of rash and negligent driving... How can this be a case of 304 (culpable homicide not amounting to murder)? The allegation is that they took the victims to a hospital 45 minutes away... There is evidence that the accused talked to the doctor on the phone about their arrival and asked them to prepare for the emergency. As per the taxi driver, the doctors treated them properly. They reached the hospital within 46 minutes and at around 2.16 am, he was declared brought dead. The version of the FIR is IO's version... The accused has been granted a 2-day Judicial custody. We have filed the bail application. The hearing is on the day after tomorrow..."

#WATCH | Dhaula Kuan BMW accident | Delhi: Counsel for accused Gaganpreet Kaur, Advocate Vikas Pahwa, "... We read the FIR, which was registered 10 hours after the incident. The incident happened at 1.30 pm and an FIR was filed at 11.30 pm...The information in the FIR contradicts the press conference... It seems incorrect... If someone dies because of rash and negligent driving, then it is a bailable offence. If someone tries to turn it into a non-bailable offence by adding certain sections, it is unfortunate. The DCP stated that the accident happened when the car crashed at a very sharp turn. When the accident happened at a sharp turn, the forward portion of the car crashed first. Two people on a two-wheeler were hit and slammed into a DTC bus... As per the CCTV, it was not provided in the court... The accused, her husband and their children were still in the car. Their airbags also opened, and they are also injured. This is not the case of rash and negligent driving... How can this be a case of 304 (culpable homicide not amounting to murder)? The allegation is that they took the victims to a hospital 45 minutes away... There is evidence that the accused talked to the doctor on the phone about their arrival and asked them to prepare for the emergency. As per the taxi driver, the doctors treated them properly. They reached the hospital within 46 minutes and at around 2.16 am, he was declared brought dead. The version of the FIR is IO's version... The accused has been granted a 2-day Judicial custody. We have filed the bail application. The hearing is on the day after tomorrow..."

ANI

54,518 次观看 • 10 个月前

The truth in the Ghazipur case is now clearer. The victim, Nisha Vishwakarma, earlier portrayed as raped and murdered by a Brahmin boy in a narrative pushed for political mileage, was seen on CCTV walking alone toward the river, and the post-mortem found no signs of rape or injury, pointing toward suicide. Remember, the Samajwadi Party tried to frame the incident along caste lines and nationalize it for political gain, even as villagers, including members of the girl’s community, resisted these attempts. Such politics, which exploit tragedy for division, only weaken society, and it’s reassuring that people are increasingly rejecting it.

The truth in the Ghazipur case is now clearer. The victim, Nisha Vishwakarma, earlier portrayed as raped and murdered by a Brahmin boy in a narrative pushed for political mileage, was seen on CCTV walking alone toward the river, and the post-mortem found no signs of rape or injury, pointing toward suicide. Remember, the Samajwadi Party tried to frame the incident along caste lines and nationalize it for political gain, even as villagers, including members of the girl’s community, resisted these attempts. Such politics, which exploit tragedy for division, only weaken society, and it’s reassuring that people are increasingly rejecting it.

THE SKIN DOCTOR

189,707 次观看 • 3 个月前

🚨 This new ICE rule should outrage EVERYONE… because it proves “do it the legal way” was always a lie. People who entered the U.S. legally… with visas, paperwork, inspections, everything… are now being arrested at their green card interviews simply because they once overstayed. Not for a crime. Not for fraud. Just for a technical lapse the green card process was literally designed to forgive. For decades, if someone overstayed but had a U.S. citizen spouse or family sponsor, the law allowed them to fix it through an adjustment-of-status interview. That was the official “legal way.” The line they were told to get in. Now the government is using that line as a trap door. Show up to your interview 👉 you risk detention. Follow the rules 👉 ICE treats you like a criminal. Try to legalize your status 👉 you get flagged for removal. And this isn’t just hitting families… it’s hitting asylum seekers, too. People fleeing violence or persecution who filed their claims exactly the way the law demands are now walking into ICE ambushes because their visa expired while they waited for the government to process their case… which the government takes years to do. They aren’t “illegal.” They aren’t skipping the system. They are literally in the middle of the legal system… and being punished for it. This policy makes it nearly impossible for huge numbers of people to ever obtain a green card, no matter how perfect, peaceful, or compliant they are. And it exposes the truth: The people screaming “do it the right way” never cared about the right way. Because even when immigrants DO follow the process step by step, the government is now turning that process into a deportation pipeline. If the legal path leads straight to ICE custody, then there is no legal path… and that is exactly the point.

🚨 This new ICE rule should outrage EVERYONE… because it proves “do it the legal way” was always a lie. People who entered the U.S. legally… with visas, paperwork, inspections, everything… are now being arrested at their green card interviews simply because they once overstayed. Not for a crime. Not for fraud. Just for a technical lapse the green card process was literally designed to forgive. For decades, if someone overstayed but had a U.S. citizen spouse or family sponsor, the law allowed them to fix it through an adjustment-of-status interview. That was the official “legal way.” The line they were told to get in. Now the government is using that line as a trap door. Show up to your interview 👉 you risk detention. Follow the rules 👉 ICE treats you like a criminal. Try to legalize your status 👉 you get flagged for removal. And this isn’t just hitting families… it’s hitting asylum seekers, too. People fleeing violence or persecution who filed their claims exactly the way the law demands are now walking into ICE ambushes because their visa expired while they waited for the government to process their case… which the government takes years to do. They aren’t “illegal.” They aren’t skipping the system. They are literally in the middle of the legal system… and being punished for it. This policy makes it nearly impossible for huge numbers of people to ever obtain a green card, no matter how perfect, peaceful, or compliant they are. And it exposes the truth: The people screaming “do it the right way” never cared about the right way. Because even when immigrants DO follow the process step by step, the government is now turning that process into a deportation pipeline. If the legal path leads straight to ICE custody, then there is no legal path… and that is exactly the point.

Jesus Freakin Congress

136,467 次观看 • 8 个月前

"How sad is it that you have an administration that is transforming a country from a place that is a magnet for people all over the world and to turn it into a place that people are afraid to come to.” --David French on The Dispatch Podcast with Jonah Goldberg and Sarah Isgur

"How sad is it that you have an administration that is transforming a country from a place that is a magnet for people all over the world and to turn it into a place that people are afraid to come to.” --David French on The Dispatch Podcast with Jonah Goldberg and Sarah Isgur

The Dispatch

27,496 次观看 • 1 年前

The left absolutely has a problem with political violence right now. Do not let them blur the line between ideological violence and political violence. They need to acknowledge and take accountability for their reckless rhetoric and what it drives people to do.

The left absolutely has a problem with political violence right now. Do not let them blur the line between ideological violence and political violence. They need to acknowledge and take accountability for their reckless rhetoric and what it drives people to do.

Jeffery Mead

70,763 次观看 • 10 个月前

Buttigieg: It is not too much to ask that, in this country and in this state, one job ought to be enough, which means wages and benefits that make that possible. It’s not too much to ask that you ought to be able to afford to raise a family in this country—to put your kid in child care if you want, or stay home and take care of them yourselves if you want, or do some combination of that if you want—and still have it add up at the end of the month. It is not too much to ask that the wealthiest country in the world have the best health care in the world and that it have the best-funded public schools in the world. And it is not too much to ask that the largest corporations and wealthiest people in this country pay at least as much of their income and wealth in taxes as a schoolteacher, a bus driver, or a firefighter. It is not too much to ask for a different kind of politics, where you look at your leaders in action and actually feel your blood pressure come down a little bit instead of going through the roof. That is a reasonable thing to expect of our leaders. It is not too much to ask. We can do this. Most of us already want this. So the obvious question is: Why hasn’t it happened? And that’s where we’ve got to talk about the system that we’re living with, which, by the way, as a politician, they kind of tell you not to do. Consultants say, “Look, no one’s going to get too fired up about the details of our democratic system when they’re just trying to keep their heads above water in this economy,” which I get, and to some extent I agree. But the reason that so many things are wrong with our economic picture is that so many things are wrong with our political system. And we’ve gotten so used to it, we can forget that there was a time when our political system was the pride of this nation. Wars have been fought for our system, starting with the first one—the one that launched 250 years ago with the Declaration of Independence, the one that gave this nation its being. The Founders risked their lives for a better political system. So don’t tell me it can’t stir people’s hearts. Don’t tell me that it’s not worth fighting for. Especially because until we do something to change our political system, we will continue to suffer from an economic system that lets us down: monopolies squeezing families and farmers on both ends; consumers and workers caught up in a system that can’t serve them; small businesses swamped by the big guys. Right now, what’s at stake is nothing less than the American dream. It is endangered.

Buttigieg: It is not too much to ask that, in this country and in this state, one job ought to be enough, which means wages and benefits that make that possible. It’s not too much to ask that you ought to be able to afford to raise a family in this country—to put your kid in child care if you want, or stay home and take care of them yourselves if you want, or do some combination of that if you want—and still have it add up at the end of the month. It is not too much to ask that the wealthiest country in the world have the best health care in the world and that it have the best-funded public schools in the world. And it is not too much to ask that the largest corporations and wealthiest people in this country pay at least as much of their income and wealth in taxes as a schoolteacher, a bus driver, or a firefighter. It is not too much to ask for a different kind of politics, where you look at your leaders in action and actually feel your blood pressure come down a little bit instead of going through the roof. That is a reasonable thing to expect of our leaders. It is not too much to ask. We can do this. Most of us already want this. So the obvious question is: Why hasn’t it happened? And that’s where we’ve got to talk about the system that we’re living with, which, by the way, as a politician, they kind of tell you not to do. Consultants say, “Look, no one’s going to get too fired up about the details of our democratic system when they’re just trying to keep their heads above water in this economy,” which I get, and to some extent I agree. But the reason that so many things are wrong with our economic picture is that so many things are wrong with our political system. And we’ve gotten so used to it, we can forget that there was a time when our political system was the pride of this nation. Wars have been fought for our system, starting with the first one—the one that launched 250 years ago with the Declaration of Independence, the one that gave this nation its being. The Founders risked their lives for a better political system. So don’t tell me it can’t stir people’s hearts. Don’t tell me that it’s not worth fighting for. Especially because until we do something to change our political system, we will continue to suffer from an economic system that lets us down: monopolies squeezing families and farmers on both ends; consumers and workers caught up in a system that can’t serve them; small businesses swamped by the big guys. Right now, what’s at stake is nothing less than the American dream. It is endangered.

Acyn

42,103 次观看 • 28 天前

California Democrats secretly just slipped a mileage tax into a budget bill hoping residents wouldn’t notice CA Rep Carl DeMaio “It comes in the form of a budget bill, Assembly Bill 130, and they slid in a mileage tax, but they call it a vehicle mileage tax, a VMT. You as a driver are not going to be charged the mileage tax directly. They're going to start increasing the cost of housing in California — they're basically saying is that houses create drivers, and drivers therefore should be paying for it” “But we really don't have the guts now that people like de Mio are out there causing a ruckus about the direct approach to a mileage tax. What if we hid it in their mortgage payment? Do you understand how dishonest, sneaky, corrupt these politicians are? Are you seeing it now? They don't want you to know that they're robbing you blind”

California Democrats secretly just slipped a mileage tax into a budget bill hoping residents wouldn’t notice CA Rep Carl DeMaio “It comes in the form of a budget bill, Assembly Bill 130, and they slid in a mileage tax, but they call it a vehicle mileage tax, a VMT. You as a driver are not going to be charged the mileage tax directly. They're going to start increasing the cost of housing in California — they're basically saying is that houses create drivers, and drivers therefore should be paying for it” “But we really don't have the guts now that people like de Mio are out there causing a ruckus about the direct approach to a mileage tax. What if we hid it in their mortgage payment? Do you understand how dishonest, sneaky, corrupt these politicians are? Are you seeing it now? They don't want you to know that they're robbing you blind”

Wall Street Apes

230,949 次观看 • 10 个月前

Graham Platner: “We will not just fight the oligarchy, we will defeat the oligarchy. And we are going to defeat the political system it maintains. It is a system that is the politics of Susan Collins. A politics that turns politicians into millionaires but tells you to be grateful for crumbs. It is a lie intended to serve the billionaire class. It is the lie that there is always money for forever wars, but never money for our schools”

Graham Platner: “We will not just fight the oligarchy, we will defeat the oligarchy. And we are going to defeat the political system it maintains. It is a system that is the politics of Susan Collins. A politics that turns politicians into millionaires but tells you to be grateful for crumbs. It is a lie intended to serve the billionaire class. It is the lie that there is always money for forever wars, but never money for our schools”

Marco Foster

25,779 次观看 • 2 个月前

RFK Jr. just told Tucker Carlson that 2.7% of vaccines given — 1 in every 37 doses — may cause injury. The CDC buried the study that uncovered it. “The problem with VAERS is that it’s voluntary.” “It takes a doctor a half an hour to fill out the paperwork, so there’s a big incentive for them not to do it.” “There’s no course on vaccine injury in any medical school in this country.” “In 2010, CDC designed a new system, and it was a machine counting system.” “They designed a machine counting system that would do essentially a cluster analysis.” “It was a team led by a guy called Lazarus.” “And CDC paid for the whole thing, millions of dollars, and it was a long term study.” “They compared what the machine counting system had gotten and compared that to what VAERS had collected during the same period.” “VAERS was capturing fewer than 1% of vaccine injuries.” “The data showed injuries in about 2.7% of vaccines.” “Which is 1/37 vaccines you get, there’s an injury.” “CDC saw that and said we’re not going to use the system.” “They shelved it in 2010, and they’ve continued to use VAERS when they know that it doesn’t work.” “It was designed to fail.” “We’re going to create either within VAERS or, supplementary to VAERS, a system that actually works.”

RFK Jr. just told Tucker Carlson that 2.7% of vaccines given — 1 in every 37 doses — may cause injury. The CDC buried the study that uncovered it. “The problem with VAERS is that it’s voluntary.” “It takes a doctor a half an hour to fill out the paperwork, so there’s a big incentive for them not to do it.” “There’s no course on vaccine injury in any medical school in this country.” “In 2010, CDC designed a new system, and it was a machine counting system.” “They designed a machine counting system that would do essentially a cluster analysis.” “It was a team led by a guy called Lazarus.” “And CDC paid for the whole thing, millions of dollars, and it was a long term study.” “They compared what the machine counting system had gotten and compared that to what VAERS had collected during the same period.” “VAERS was capturing fewer than 1% of vaccine injuries.” “The data showed injuries in about 2.7% of vaccines.” “Which is 1/37 vaccines you get, there’s an injury.” “CDC saw that and said we’re not going to use the system.” “They shelved it in 2010, and they’ve continued to use VAERS when they know that it doesn’t work.” “It was designed to fail.” “We’re going to create either within VAERS or, supplementary to VAERS, a system that actually works.”

End Tribalism in Politics

171,946 次观看 • 1 年前

When brutality crosses every limit, the real question is not outrage. It is whether justice is strong enough to stop the next crime. A shocking case involving a 19-year-old accused, Rahul Meena, has raised serious concerns. Complaints were reportedly filed in both Rajasthan and Delhi. After an earlier case in Alwar, he allegedly fled to Delhi, where he had previously worked in a house in the Amar Colony area. According to reports, he used his familiarity with the house and routine to enter early in the morning. Later, a 22-year-old woman, preparing for UPSC, was found dead, with evidence suggesting both murder and sexual assault. Accused was subsequently arrested from Dwarka, and police have stated that there is substantial evidence against him. Cases like this raise difficult but necessary questions about safety, justice, and deterrence. When crimes are premeditated and involve such brutality, people naturally question whether the punishment system is strong enough to prevent future crimes. The larger issue is not just one case, but the sense of safety for millions of women. Justice must be swift, fair, and strong enough to build real confidence in the system. The question is not political. It is fundamental. How do we ensure that such crimes are prevented, and that justice delivers both accountability and deterrence? Jai Hind. Jai Bharat.🇮🇳

When brutality crosses every limit, the real question is not outrage. It is whether justice is strong enough to stop the next crime. A shocking case involving a 19-year-old accused, Rahul Meena, has raised serious concerns. Complaints were reportedly filed in both Rajasthan and Delhi. After an earlier case in Alwar, he allegedly fled to Delhi, where he had previously worked in a house in the Amar Colony area. According to reports, he used his familiarity with the house and routine to enter early in the morning. Later, a 22-year-old woman, preparing for UPSC, was found dead, with evidence suggesting both murder and sexual assault. Accused was subsequently arrested from Dwarka, and police have stated that there is substantial evidence against him. Cases like this raise difficult but necessary questions about safety, justice, and deterrence. When crimes are premeditated and involve such brutality, people naturally question whether the punishment system is strong enough to prevent future crimes. The larger issue is not just one case, but the sense of safety for millions of women. Justice must be swift, fair, and strong enough to build real confidence in the system. The question is not political. It is fundamental. How do we ensure that such crimes are prevented, and that justice delivers both accountability and deterrence? Jai Hind. Jai Bharat.🇮🇳

Praffulgarg

19,432 次观看 • 3 个月前

🚨MSNBC: The central district of California, the top political ally of trump there, and who runs that office acting, if you will, as the U.S. Attorney, Bill Essayli — sources have told us that he was PRESSING FOR WEEKS for his line attorneys (civil servants) to basically bring a criminal investigation or a criminal case against Gavin Newsom. That is NOT how the DOJ works. That is against the manual, the protocol, the regulations in some cases. The DOJ and the FBI have strict rules about when you open an investigation. It's based on evidence and a reasonable, articulable basis to believe a crime has occurred. Evidence of a crime is where you start, not with a dartboard of people who Donald Trump doesn’t like and that is a worry in that office.

🚨MSNBC: The central district of California, the top political ally of trump there, and who runs that office acting, if you will, as the U.S. Attorney, Bill Essayli — sources have told us that he was PRESSING FOR WEEKS for his line attorneys (civil servants) to basically bring a criminal investigation or a criminal case against Gavin Newsom. That is NOT how the DOJ works. That is against the manual, the protocol, the regulations in some cases. The DOJ and the FBI have strict rules about when you open an investigation. It's based on evidence and a reasonable, articulable basis to believe a crime has occurred. Evidence of a crime is where you start, not with a dartboard of people who Donald Trump doesn’t like and that is a worry in that office.

Newsom News

24,596 次观看 • 1 个月前

The ANC’s survival has never been an accident. It has been sustained by renewal, discipline, and the repeated willingness of young people to organise when the moment demanded it. If the ANC is to exist for another 114 years, renewal must be real. The national emergency is youth economic agency – earning pathways, skills that convert into work, enterprise that can access finance and markets, and a political economy that stops locking young people out. The future is not an accident. It is built. #ANC114 #ANCrenewal #YouthEconomicAgency #EconomicInclusion #TheFutureIsNotAnAccident #FactsWillPrevail

The ANC’s survival has never been an accident. It has been sustained by renewal, discipline, and the repeated willingness of young people to organise when the moment demanded it. If the ANC is to exist for another 114 years, renewal must be real. The national emergency is youth economic agency – earning pathways, skills that convert into work, enterprise that can access finance and markets, and a political economy that stops locking young people out. The future is not an accident. It is built. #ANC114 #ANCrenewal #YouthEconomicAgency #EconomicInclusion #TheFutureIsNotAnAccident #FactsWillPrevail

Dr Malusi Gigaba

28,158 次观看 • 7 个月前

Reports about broad pardons for officials are going to spark a huge debate, and you can see why. That power sits right at the center of how a president protects allies or addresses potential legal exposure. But using it on a wide scale always raises questions. Where’s the line between protection… and overreach? And once that conversation starts, it doesn’t stay quiet. It turns into a major political fight fast.

Reports about broad pardons for officials are going to spark a huge debate, and you can see why. That power sits right at the center of how a president protects allies or addresses potential legal exposure. But using it on a wide scale always raises questions. Where’s the line between protection… and overreach? And once that conversation starts, it doesn’t stay quiet. It turns into a major political fight fast.

ⁿᵉʷˢ Barron Trump 🇺🇸

39,042 次观看 • 4 个月前

Without taking accountability for The View's own incendiary and dehumanizing rhetoric against Trump, Alyssa Farah Griffin bloviates about how we need to bring the temperature down: "I know we will talk a lot about this so I won't steal the microphone, but we have a problem with political violence in this country. It is not right that it almost becomes like, okay, I'm scrolling to the next thing on Instagram. Of course there was a shooting. People are becoming desensitized to this, it's not like it was 20 years ago. If this had happened, if it was Reagan's assassination attempt at the Hilton as well, that was news for weeks on end. And I feel like we're sort of just this is what happens now. People get radicalized and try to kill people in our politics. It is not right and leaders need to come together, condemn it and come up with actual solutions."

Without taking accountability for The View's own incendiary and dehumanizing rhetoric against Trump, Alyssa Farah Griffin bloviates about how we need to bring the temperature down: "I know we will talk a lot about this so I won't steal the microphone, but we have a problem with political violence in this country. It is not right that it almost becomes like, okay, I'm scrolling to the next thing on Instagram. Of course there was a shooting. People are becoming desensitized to this, it's not like it was 20 years ago. If this had happened, if it was Reagan's assassination attempt at the Hilton as well, that was news for weeks on end. And I feel like we're sort of just this is what happens now. People get radicalized and try to kill people in our politics. It is not right and leaders need to come together, condemn it and come up with actual solutions."

Nicholas Fondacaro

55,133 次观看 • 3 个月前

Africa Did Not Create the Transatlantic Slave Trade; Europe's Demand Did The idea that “Africans sold Africans” has been repeated so often that people treat it like complete history, when it is anything but. It strips away context and forces a modern racial reading onto a pre-colonial African world that did not organise itself around European ideas of race. Africa was not one people and it was not one identity. It was made up of kingdoms, empires, nations and ethnic groups with their own political systems, cultures and interests. So when conflict happened, it was not “Black people selling Black people” in the way that phrase is now used. It was political conflict between distinct societies, just as Europe had its own wars between rival states and kingdoms. What Europe created through the transatlantic slave trade was something different in scale, structure and purpose. This was not simply an extension of local wars. It was a racialised, hereditary and industrial system built for profit, conquest and extraction. European demand drove it, expanded it and turned human beings into global commodities on a scale the world had not seen before. That is why the “Africans sold Africans” argument is not serious history. It is a lazy deflection that avoids naming Europe’s central role in designing, racialising and profiting from the transatlantic slave trade.

Africa Did Not Create the Transatlantic Slave Trade; Europe's Demand Did The idea that “Africans sold Africans” has been repeated so often that people treat it like complete history, when it is anything but. It strips away context and forces a modern racial reading onto a pre-colonial African world that did not organise itself around European ideas of race. Africa was not one people and it was not one identity. It was made up of kingdoms, empires, nations and ethnic groups with their own political systems, cultures and interests. So when conflict happened, it was not “Black people selling Black people” in the way that phrase is now used. It was political conflict between distinct societies, just as Europe had its own wars between rival states and kingdoms. What Europe created through the transatlantic slave trade was something different in scale, structure and purpose. This was not simply an extension of local wars. It was a racialised, hereditary and industrial system built for profit, conquest and extraction. European demand drove it, expanded it and turned human beings into global commodities on a scale the world had not seen before. That is why the “Africans sold Africans” argument is not serious history. It is a lazy deflection that avoids naming Europe’s central role in designing, racialising and profiting from the transatlantic slave trade.

The Spearhead

17,571 次观看 • 4 个月前

🚨 BREAKING: El Salvador President Nayib Bukele credits the hand of God for TURNING AROUND his country in favor of prosperity and safety 🇺🇸🇸🇻 "It was the hand of God. And no one can doubt it!" "It is a constant proof that God works when asked with faith. Transforming that, the most dangerous country in the world, into what it is today, is the clearest miracle." "If God took what was already more or less good and perfected it, yes, it was a miracle..." "...but if God took the worst and turned it into security, into the best, then it is an example of a miracle. Without a doubt, and with proof. What are the proofs? Not only the great fact, but what we supposedly did." "We have to confess that we do not know how it happened. And there is no one who can come and explain how it happened. Otherwise, let it not be a miracle." BUKELE IS INCREDIBLE! A model for the West!

🚨 BREAKING: El Salvador President Nayib Bukele credits the hand of God for TURNING AROUND his country in favor of prosperity and safety 🇺🇸🇸🇻 "It was the hand of God. And no one can doubt it!" "It is a constant proof that God works when asked with faith. Transforming that, the most dangerous country in the world, into what it is today, is the clearest miracle." "If God took what was already more or less good and perfected it, yes, it was a miracle..." "...but if God took the worst and turned it into security, into the best, then it is an example of a miracle. Without a doubt, and with proof. What are the proofs? Not only the great fact, but what we supposedly did." "We have to confess that we do not know how it happened. And there is no one who can come and explain how it happened. Otherwise, let it not be a miracle." BUKELE IS INCREDIBLE! A model for the West!

Eric Daugherty

136,747 次观看 • 6 个月前

"If so much could be achieved in just twelve years, then one must ask: why did it not happen over all the decades before 2014? That is the difference between the Congress growth rate and the NDA growth rate. There was a system that made people wait. Today, there is a system that delivers results. There was a system where projects were delayed, decisions were deferred, and progress was held back. Today, there is a system that says the work will be done, done on time, and done at scale. That is why the story of India between 2014 and 2026 is not merely a story of numbers. It is the story of a nation that, for the first time, began to run at the full measure of its potential." — Hon'ble Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi

"If so much could be achieved in just twelve years, then one must ask: why did it not happen over all the decades before 2014? That is the difference between the Congress growth rate and the NDA growth rate. There was a system that made people wait. Today, there is a system that delivers results. There was a system where projects were delayed, decisions were deferred, and progress was held back. Today, there is a system that says the work will be done, done on time, and done at scale. That is why the story of India between 2014 and 2026 is not merely a story of numbers. It is the story of a nation that, for the first time, began to run at the full measure of its potential." — Hon'ble Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi

G Kishan Reddy

13,848 次观看 • 2 个月前