Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Reports about broad pardons for officials are going to spark a huge debate, and you can see why. That power sits right at the center of how a president protects allies or addresses potential legal exposure. But using it on a wide scale always raises questions. Where’s the line... show more

ⁿᵉʷˢ Barron Trump 🇺🇸

759,112 subscribers

39,042 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik Bildung

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

BANNON: This sends a signal to Iran, but it also sends a signal to the American people. This is a major escalation. Now you're talking about 5,000 marines in the area, and you have 3 US officials saying it is for potential activity around the Strait of Hormuz. I think that would have been best to fully put that out at a morning briefing where you can actually answer some questions about it.

BANNON: This sends a signal to Iran, but it also sends a signal to the American people. This is a major escalation. Now you're talking about 5,000 marines in the area, and you have 3 US officials saying it is for potential activity around the Strait of Hormuz. I think that would have been best to fully put that out at a morning briefing where you can actually answer some questions about it.

Bannon’s WarRoom

68,145 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

The presidential pardon system is broken. Right now, there are no meaningful checks on the President’s pardon power. That makes it ripe for abuse, and it’s a threat to the rule of law. That’s why I support a constitutional amendment to put commonsense limits in place: no self-pardons, no pardons for family, administration officials, or campaign staff, and no pardons for anyone whose crimes were committed to benefit the President or those closest to them — or carried out at a President’s direction. It is time to protect the Constitution and the rule of law with common sense limits that restore public trust.

The presidential pardon system is broken. Right now, there are no meaningful checks on the President’s pardon power. That makes it ripe for abuse, and it’s a threat to the rule of law. That’s why I support a constitutional amendment to put commonsense limits in place: no self-pardons, no pardons for family, administration officials, or campaign staff, and no pardons for anyone whose crimes were committed to benefit the President or those closest to them — or carried out at a President’s direction. It is time to protect the Constitution and the rule of law with common sense limits that restore public trust.

Rep. Mike Levin

212,601 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

"If you want to live the American DREAM, move to Finland...It's NOT for what you think..." There’s a country that consistently ranks near the top in education… But it doesn’t follow the same rules most schools do. Different structure. Different priorities. Different results. And once you see how it works, it raises questions about everything else.

"If you want to live the American DREAM, move to Finland...It's NOT for what you think..." There’s a country that consistently ranks near the top in education… But it doesn’t follow the same rules most schools do. Different structure. Different priorities. Different results. And once you see how it works, it raises questions about everything else.

Julian Dorey

27,325 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Graham Platner: “We will not just fight the oligarchy, we will defeat the oligarchy. And we are going to defeat the political system it maintains. It is a system that is the politics of Susan Collins. A politics that turns politicians into millionaires but tells you to be grateful for crumbs. It is a lie intended to serve the billionaire class. It is the lie that there is always money for forever wars, but never money for our schools”

Graham Platner: “We will not just fight the oligarchy, we will defeat the oligarchy. And we are going to defeat the political system it maintains. It is a system that is the politics of Susan Collins. A politics that turns politicians into millionaires but tells you to be grateful for crumbs. It is a lie intended to serve the billionaire class. It is the lie that there is always money for forever wars, but never money for our schools”

Marco Foster

25,779 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

And that is it, folks. The cat 4 got us. We are out of power, and I'll try to update when I can. There are tons of rain and wind. Listen for train sounds. If you hear that, get into a room or bathroom that is the center of the house. Stay safe. Xoxo Sass.

And that is it, folks. The cat 4 got us. We are out of power, and I'll try to update when I can. There are tons of rain and wind. Listen for train sounds. If you hear that, get into a room or bathroom that is the center of the house. Stay safe. Xoxo Sass.

Sassafrass84

249,136 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Piers: "This debate you are going to have with the historian Jonathan Zimmerman at the University of Pennsylvania on Friday, ironically about free speech. Is that debate happening, or is it off?" Steven: "They said, no, we're not going to allow it.... If I was a jazz musician I could livestream it. But a transparent, respectful debate between one of their professors and someone fronting $10,000? That can't happen on campus."

Piers: "This debate you are going to have with the historian Jonathan Zimmerman at the University of Pennsylvania on Friday, ironically about free speech. Is that debate happening, or is it off?" Steven: "They said, no, we're not going to allow it.... If I was a jazz musician I could livestream it. But a transparent, respectful debate between one of their professors and someone fronting $10,000? That can't happen on campus."

Steven Crowder

567,370 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Ghazipur case: There’s a difference between questioning the system and using a tragedy for mileage. SP seems to have blurred that line. When even the victim’s father points it out, it exposes how hollow that approach is. A crime happened, the system quickly reacted, an FIR was filed, the accused was arrested, and the victim’s family is satisfied by the govt's work, so what’s the need to turn their village into "Peepli Live" if not for political mileage? Turning grief into a political spectacle crosses a line; it stops being about accountability and starts looking like opportunism. People are fed up with that.

Ghazipur case: There’s a difference between questioning the system and using a tragedy for mileage. SP seems to have blurred that line. When even the victim’s father points it out, it exposes how hollow that approach is. A crime happened, the system quickly reacted, an FIR was filed, the accused was arrested, and the victim’s family is satisfied by the govt's work, so what’s the need to turn their village into "Peepli Live" if not for political mileage? Turning grief into a political spectacle crosses a line; it stops being about accountability and starts looking like opportunism. People are fed up with that.

THE SKIN DOCTOR

41,105 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🚨Dear Hakeem Jeffries, You stood in front of the country… and told us that the Supreme Court took away Black people’s right to vote. Let that sink in. That’s not a misunderstanding. That’s not a misquote. That’s not “spin.” That is a statement that does not match reality. No one lost their vote. No one was removed from the process. No ballots were taken. So the question becomes… Why say it? Why take something that is a legal debate about how districts are drawn… and turn it into a claim that people are being stripped of their fundamental rights? Because once you convince people they’re under attack… you don’t have to explain anything else. And that’s where this video starts. We’re going to break this down cleanly… step by step… no emotion, just facts… What the Court actually said… What Jeffries claimed… And why those two things don’t line up. If you sir, care about truth… if you care about being told what’s real and not what’s useful… Stay right here. Let’s get into it. #SilentMajoritySpeaks #AStoneGroove

🚨Dear Hakeem Jeffries, You stood in front of the country… and told us that the Supreme Court took away Black people’s right to vote. Let that sink in. That’s not a misunderstanding. That’s not a misquote. That’s not “spin.” That is a statement that does not match reality. No one lost their vote. No one was removed from the process. No ballots were taken. So the question becomes… Why say it? Why take something that is a legal debate about how districts are drawn… and turn it into a claim that people are being stripped of their fundamental rights? Because once you convince people they’re under attack… you don’t have to explain anything else. And that’s where this video starts. We’re going to break this down cleanly… step by step… no emotion, just facts… What the Court actually said… What Jeffries claimed… And why those two things don’t line up. If you sir, care about truth… if you care about being told what’s real and not what’s useful… Stay right here. Let’s get into it. #SilentMajoritySpeaks #AStoneGroove

A Gene Robinson

137,704 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

“Courts have stopped the president from defacing the Kennedy Center, but they haven’t stopped him from destroying the Kennedy Center. And the larger fight is over the future of the Kennedy Center. And that fight is surrounding Trump’s plan to close it down for two years and then gut it, and then renovate it, however he sees fit, I’m sure with a lot of gold stuff, right? And that fight is still ongoing.” “And what that means is that after July 4th, there is nothing planned at the Kennedy Center. If you look on the website in the calendar, there’s nothing booked. So, he’s effectively killing the Kennedy Center, even though his name’s not going to be on it, by just not booking anything and not putting anybody in charge of it. And that’s a tragedy for the Kennedy Center. And whatever you thought about the Kennedy Center before, for the next period of time, it’s going to be vacant.” “And that’s Trump’s decision. He would rather kill it out of spite because he didn’t get his way than to let it continue even imperfectly in the way it was operating. That’s very sad for the people who care about the Kennedy Center and the programming that was going on there.”

“Courts have stopped the president from defacing the Kennedy Center, but they haven’t stopped him from destroying the Kennedy Center. And the larger fight is over the future of the Kennedy Center. And that fight is surrounding Trump’s plan to close it down for two years and then gut it, and then renovate it, however he sees fit, I’m sure with a lot of gold stuff, right? And that fight is still ongoing.” “And what that means is that after July 4th, there is nothing planned at the Kennedy Center. If you look on the website in the calendar, there’s nothing booked. So, he’s effectively killing the Kennedy Center, even though his name’s not going to be on it, by just not booking anything and not putting anybody in charge of it. And that’s a tragedy for the Kennedy Center. And whatever you thought about the Kennedy Center before, for the next period of time, it’s going to be vacant.” “And that’s Trump’s decision. He would rather kill it out of spite because he didn’t get his way than to let it continue even imperfectly in the way it was operating. That’s very sad for the people who care about the Kennedy Center and the programming that was going on there.”

Josh Rogin

28,183 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

"You cannot ask and expect a nation to fight for a nation that no longer exists in the minds of those you expect to fight for it." Bottom line. To the political class. The people are coming.

"You cannot ask and expect a nation to fight for a nation that no longer exists in the minds of those you expect to fight for it." Bottom line. To the political class. The people are coming.

Darren of Plymouth

67,162 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

I mean, a criminal with a record dies during a by-the-book arrest, and it turns out it was from an overdose, not the cop. The whole world (or at least the dumbest part of it) kneels, puts on a global circus, and turns him into a martyr. But when they kill a white kid, a student with no record, in the middle of the street, the police pounce on the guy and let him bleed out. It doesn’t make the news or the front pages. If it weren’t for social media, it wouldn’t even exist. And there are still people who don’t see that this is total war? You don’t see it? Well, then we’re fucked.

I mean, a criminal with a record dies during a by-the-book arrest, and it turns out it was from an overdose, not the cop. The whole world (or at least the dumbest part of it) kneels, puts on a global circus, and turns him into a martyr. But when they kill a white kid, a student with no record, in the middle of the street, the police pounce on the guy and let him bleed out. It doesn’t make the news or the front pages. If it weren’t for social media, it wouldn’t even exist. And there are still people who don’t see that this is total war? You don’t see it? Well, then we’re fucked.

Johnny Woker

128,430 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Mark it. “Ladies and gentlemen, you will not hear a better argument for the President of the United States than those five minutes and twenty-five seconds right here: Cut it. Mark it. Drop it in. Are you a Leftist? Are you a Communist? Are you a Marxist? Are you super Right-wing? Doesn’t matter. You can’t disagree with that. That is the best argument you will ever hear—condensed, distilled, like proof alcohol—into why Charlie Kirk believes in this President.”

Mark it. “Ladies and gentlemen, you will not hear a better argument for the President of the United States than those five minutes and twenty-five seconds right here: Cut it. Mark it. Drop it in. Are you a Leftist? Are you a Communist? Are you a Marxist? Are you super Right-wing? Doesn’t matter. You can’t disagree with that. That is the best argument you will ever hear—condensed, distilled, like proof alcohol—into why Charlie Kirk believes in this President.”

🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

1,548,630 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

This is sparking a real debate… 🌯 A customer went into Chipotle and asked for extra rice—something many people believe is supposed to be free. But this time, the manager stepped in and said he’d have to charge for it. What should’ve been a simple request instantly turned into tension. Some people are saying the customer is right, rice has always been free, so why change it now? Others argue the manager is just enforcing portions and trying to prevent people from taking advantage. It’s one of those small moments that turns into a bigger question about fairness, consistency, and where businesses draw the line. Because once you start charging for something that used to be free… everything changes. So who’s in the right here, the customer expecting what’s always been offered, or the manager trying to control portions? And would this make you think twice about going back?

This is sparking a real debate… 🌯 A customer went into Chipotle and asked for extra rice—something many people believe is supposed to be free. But this time, the manager stepped in and said he’d have to charge for it. What should’ve been a simple request instantly turned into tension. Some people are saying the customer is right, rice has always been free, so why change it now? Others argue the manager is just enforcing portions and trying to prevent people from taking advantage. It’s one of those small moments that turns into a bigger question about fairness, consistency, and where businesses draw the line. Because once you start charging for something that used to be free… everything changes. So who’s in the right here, the customer expecting what’s always been offered, or the manager trying to control portions? And would this make you think twice about going back?

Dr.L

622,990 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Nelson Koech: I am very proud of my president. Have you seen how State house looks? You can see it is the seat of power John Kaguchia: State house has become a seat of power at the expense of Kenyans. Children are not going to school and now you tell us that you’re happy about how it looks? #CitizenDayBreak

Nelson Koech: I am very proud of my president. Have you seen how State house looks? You can see it is the seat of power John Kaguchia: State house has become a seat of power at the expense of Kenyans. Children are not going to school and now you tell us that you’re happy about how it looks? #CitizenDayBreak

Citizen TV Kenya

82,374 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Most people were taught Darwin’s theory of evolution explains how all life came to be. What if that’s not the full story? Stephen C. Meyer says growing evidence is challenging that idea, and many scientists are now calling for a new theory of evolution. “There’s a huge difference between the idea that natural selection is a real process… and the claim that it has unlimited creative power.” “Many leading evolutionary biologists today are now calling for a new theory of evolution.” “They recognize that the mutation natural selection mechanism has limited creative power.” “It does a nice job of explaining small-scale variation and adaptation.” “But it doesn’t do a good job of explaining… major new body plans or new forms.” Stephen C. Meyer

Most people were taught Darwin’s theory of evolution explains how all life came to be. What if that’s not the full story? Stephen C. Meyer says growing evidence is challenging that idea, and many scientists are now calling for a new theory of evolution. “There’s a huge difference between the idea that natural selection is a real process… and the claim that it has unlimited creative power.” “Many leading evolutionary biologists today are now calling for a new theory of evolution.” “They recognize that the mutation natural selection mechanism has limited creative power.” “It does a nice job of explaining small-scale variation and adaptation.” “But it doesn’t do a good job of explaining… major new body plans or new forms.” Stephen C. Meyer

Jan Jekielek

77,498 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

The Circle (2000, Panahi)/ Iran "Political movies have limited time. After that time, it doesn’t say anything anymore. But if the whole thing is said in an artistic way, then it doesn’t have an expiration date." --- Jafar Panahi Full Excerpt: "Interviewer: The subject matter of 'The Circle' (2000) is controversial. You mentioned that the film is still banned in Iran. In fact, when I was watching the film, I realized that through the characters, there’s a lot of fear about the system, the establishment, the police. The women can’t smoke; they have to wear the chador; they seem to want to hide every time. This is all very clear from watching the film. Did you deliberately want to make a statement about the political situation in Iran? Panahi: I have to tell you again that I’m not a political person. I don’t like political movies. But I take every opportunity to comment on the social issues. I talk about the current issues. To me it’s not important what is the reason for what has happened. Whether it’s political reasons or geographical reasons: these are not important—but the condition, the social issues. It is important to me to talk about the plight of humanity at that time. I don’t want to give a political view, or start a political war. I think that the artist should rise above this. Political movies have limited time. After that time, it doesn’t say anything anymore. But if the whole thing is said in an artistic way, then it doesn’t have an expiration date. So it doesn’t really serve a political purpose. Then it can be everlasting, for always, and it could be for anywhere. But I know that politically, with the film authorities, with any kind of film that has some political background in it, they would take issue with it. And for this reason, that is what the problem is. Interviewer: Still, your film makes a very strong statement about the problems that women face in Iran. Panahi: Yes, I agree with that. Interviewer: So that is humanitarian, of course, but it’s also political. Panahi: Yes, I agree with that. It has the elements. It all depends on how you look at it. If a person has only political views, then he will only see the political. But if you are a poet or an artist, then you see other things as well in the movie. If you are a socialist, you see political or economic or whatever different points of view. You mustn’t look at a film with only one point of view. If you want to see 'The Circle' (2000) as political, then it is one of the most political movies in Iran. By political, I mean partisan politics. But even the police, I didn’t want to show them as bad. In the first instance, you are afraid of the police. Because you are looking at them from the point of view of someone who is now in prison. And normally you see him in a long shot, but when they come nearer and you see them in a medium shot, you can see their human faces. Then it comes down to, “Do you need any help?” But he goes back again and becomes frightening. If I were being political, then I would always show the police as dangerous or bad persons." (Jafar Panahi's interview with Stephen Teo, Senses of Cinema, 2001)

The Circle (2000, Panahi)/ Iran "Political movies have limited time. After that time, it doesn’t say anything anymore. But if the whole thing is said in an artistic way, then it doesn’t have an expiration date." --- Jafar Panahi Full Excerpt: "Interviewer: The subject matter of 'The Circle' (2000) is controversial. You mentioned that the film is still banned in Iran. In fact, when I was watching the film, I realized that through the characters, there’s a lot of fear about the system, the establishment, the police. The women can’t smoke; they have to wear the chador; they seem to want to hide every time. This is all very clear from watching the film. Did you deliberately want to make a statement about the political situation in Iran? Panahi: I have to tell you again that I’m not a political person. I don’t like political movies. But I take every opportunity to comment on the social issues. I talk about the current issues. To me it’s not important what is the reason for what has happened. Whether it’s political reasons or geographical reasons: these are not important—but the condition, the social issues. It is important to me to talk about the plight of humanity at that time. I don’t want to give a political view, or start a political war. I think that the artist should rise above this. Political movies have limited time. After that time, it doesn’t say anything anymore. But if the whole thing is said in an artistic way, then it doesn’t have an expiration date. So it doesn’t really serve a political purpose. Then it can be everlasting, for always, and it could be for anywhere. But I know that politically, with the film authorities, with any kind of film that has some political background in it, they would take issue with it. And for this reason, that is what the problem is. Interviewer: Still, your film makes a very strong statement about the problems that women face in Iran. Panahi: Yes, I agree with that. Interviewer: So that is humanitarian, of course, but it’s also political. Panahi: Yes, I agree with that. It has the elements. It all depends on how you look at it. If a person has only political views, then he will only see the political. But if you are a poet or an artist, then you see other things as well in the movie. If you are a socialist, you see political or economic or whatever different points of view. You mustn’t look at a film with only one point of view. If you want to see 'The Circle' (2000) as political, then it is one of the most political movies in Iran. By political, I mean partisan politics. But even the police, I didn’t want to show them as bad. In the first instance, you are afraid of the police. Because you are looking at them from the point of view of someone who is now in prison. And normally you see him in a long shot, but when they come nearer and you see them in a medium shot, you can see their human faces. Then it comes down to, “Do you need any help?” But he goes back again and becomes frightening. If I were being political, then I would always show the police as dangerous or bad persons." (Jafar Panahi's interview with Stephen Teo, Senses of Cinema, 2001)

DepressedBergman

43,871 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

🚨 DJ Akademiks Claims Legal Battle With Roc Nation Is Brewing DJ Akademiks is sounding the alarm on a potential legal showdown with Roc Nation, accusing the company of using unfair and possibly illegal tactics to silence creators 👀 ⚖️ Akademiks Main Allegation Ak claims Roc Nation is: •Abusing the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) •Filing copyright claims on YouTube content that he says falls under fair use •Targeting videos and opinions that are critical of Jay-Z “They’re using laws meant to protect creators… to suppress voices.” 📌 What He Says Is Happening According to Akademiks: •Content discussing Jay-Z is being flagged or removed •DMCA claims are allegedly being used strategically to take down criticism •Similar tactics have reportedly been used across platforms like Instagram He argues this isn’t about copyright it’s about controlling narratives online ⚠️ Potential Legal Action Akademiks says: •He and others are gathering evidence •A legal battle is likely on the horizon •The situation could escalate into a broader fight over creator rights and misuse of copyright law “Prepare for the storm… this is going to be pursued legally.” 🧠 Bigger Picture If true, this could raise serious questions about: •How the DMCA is being used in the music/media industry •The line between copyright protection vs. censorship •Power dynamics between major companies and independent creators 👀 Final Take Right now, these are allegations from Akademiks, and Roc Nation has not publicly responded. But if this turns into a real legal case, it could become a major moment for content creators, fair use, and digital rights.

🚨 DJ Akademiks Claims Legal Battle With Roc Nation Is Brewing DJ Akademiks is sounding the alarm on a potential legal showdown with Roc Nation, accusing the company of using unfair and possibly illegal tactics to silence creators 👀 ⚖️ Akademiks Main Allegation Ak claims Roc Nation is: •Abusing the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) •Filing copyright claims on YouTube content that he says falls under fair use •Targeting videos and opinions that are critical of Jay-Z “They’re using laws meant to protect creators… to suppress voices.” 📌 What He Says Is Happening According to Akademiks: •Content discussing Jay-Z is being flagged or removed •DMCA claims are allegedly being used strategically to take down criticism •Similar tactics have reportedly been used across platforms like Instagram He argues this isn’t about copyright it’s about controlling narratives online ⚠️ Potential Legal Action Akademiks says: •He and others are gathering evidence •A legal battle is likely on the horizon •The situation could escalate into a broader fight over creator rights and misuse of copyright law “Prepare for the storm… this is going to be pursued legally.” 🧠 Bigger Picture If true, this could raise serious questions about: •How the DMCA is being used in the music/media industry •The line between copyright protection vs. censorship •Power dynamics between major companies and independent creators 👀 Final Take Right now, these are allegations from Akademiks, and Roc Nation has not publicly responded. But if this turns into a real legal case, it could become a major moment for content creators, fair use, and digital rights.

Cousin Tino ™️

119,682 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

There was a point in my conversation with Andrew Bridgen (Andrew Bridgen) where everything slowed down and the weight of what was being discussed became very real. This is a disgusting subject. It’s horrifying. And it’s exactly why it rarely gets talked about. Andrew speaks about child abuse and child trafficking into the UK and about how quickly the shutters come down when these issues are raised. Not debate. Not investigation. Silence. He goes further and explains something most people instinctively reject because it’s so hard to process. That at the very highest levels of power, child abuse and trafficking function as a form of sacrifice and as a binding mechanism. A glue that holds corruption together. Something so dark and compromising that it ensures silence, loyalty, and control among the most powerful people in the world. For most decent people, even contemplating this feels impossible. And that inability to imagine it is part of why it continues. It protects those involved. Andrew talks about having seen evidence. About how deeply disturbing it is. About the fact that even police officers investigating child abuse are limited in how long they can work on these cases because of the psychological damage it causes. This is not said lightly. And it’s not said for shock value. Posting this is not comfortable. Talking about it is not safe. Even sharing this conversation carries risk. But pretending these things don’t exist doesn’t make them go away. It only protects the structures that allow them to continue. If there are subjects that are truly forbidden, truly untouchable, then we should be asking why. And who benefits from that silence.

There was a point in my conversation with Andrew Bridgen (Andrew Bridgen) where everything slowed down and the weight of what was being discussed became very real. This is a disgusting subject. It’s horrifying. And it’s exactly why it rarely gets talked about. Andrew speaks about child abuse and child trafficking into the UK and about how quickly the shutters come down when these issues are raised. Not debate. Not investigation. Silence. He goes further and explains something most people instinctively reject because it’s so hard to process. That at the very highest levels of power, child abuse and trafficking function as a form of sacrifice and as a binding mechanism. A glue that holds corruption together. Something so dark and compromising that it ensures silence, loyalty, and control among the most powerful people in the world. For most decent people, even contemplating this feels impossible. And that inability to imagine it is part of why it continues. It protects those involved. Andrew talks about having seen evidence. About how deeply disturbing it is. About the fact that even police officers investigating child abuse are limited in how long they can work on these cases because of the psychological damage it causes. This is not said lightly. And it’s not said for shock value. Posting this is not comfortable. Talking about it is not safe. Even sharing this conversation carries risk. But pretending these things don’t exist doesn’t make them go away. It only protects the structures that allow them to continue. If there are subjects that are truly forbidden, truly untouchable, then we should be asking why. And who benefits from that silence.

Digby Furneaux

18,654 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

It’s only an idiot who would fail to see that this man called Bola Ahmed Tinubu is a political/leadership institution that every upcoming political gladiator needs to study very well. This is a man who understands power, timing, structure, and loyalty. A man who knows when to move, when to stay quiet, and when to strike with full force. Many people talk politics, but very few actually understand how to build and sustain political influence the way he has done over the years. You think the “Emi Lokan” slogan was just ordinary talk or empty noise? Think again. That statement was a clear signal, a declaration backed by years of planning, alliances, and strategic positioning. It was not luck, it was a calculation. I’m honestly happy and proud that the people I call my political leaders here in the South East have a close relationship with him. It shows they understand where real power sits and how to connect to it. In politics, proximity to experience and structure are very important, and those who are smart enough to learn will always position themselves where decisions are shaped. President Bola Ahmed Tinubu is his name!! ♾️♾️🇳🇬

It’s only an idiot who would fail to see that this man called Bola Ahmed Tinubu is a political/leadership institution that every upcoming political gladiator needs to study very well. This is a man who understands power, timing, structure, and loyalty. A man who knows when to move, when to stay quiet, and when to strike with full force. Many people talk politics, but very few actually understand how to build and sustain political influence the way he has done over the years. You think the “Emi Lokan” slogan was just ordinary talk or empty noise? Think again. That statement was a clear signal, a declaration backed by years of planning, alliances, and strategic positioning. It was not luck, it was a calculation. I’m honestly happy and proud that the people I call my political leaders here in the South East have a close relationship with him. It shows they understand where real power sits and how to connect to it. In politics, proximity to experience and structure are very important, and those who are smart enough to learn will always position themselves where decisions are shaped. President Bola Ahmed Tinubu is his name!! ♾️♾️🇳🇬

𝑴𝒂𝐳𝐢.𝐍𝐧𝐚𝑬𝒎𝒆𝒌𝒂🇳🇬

33,819 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

It’s dry out there. And it doesn’t take much. Take a look at this fire from last night along 6th Avenue. From the air, it looks bigger that it really was- about one acre. But one acre with potential. The potential to move toward fence lines and homes. 🔥 Crews kept it small with quick work. Unlike 80 - 90% of all wildfires, this wasn't human-caused. It started when a malfunctioning electrical box on a lighted highway sign dropped sparks into the dry grass below. That’s it. That’s all it takes right now. Stay aware. Stay ready. And don’t underestimate how fast things can go from nothing… to this. 🔥🚒 #westmetrofirerescue

It’s dry out there. And it doesn’t take much. Take a look at this fire from last night along 6th Avenue. From the air, it looks bigger that it really was- about one acre. But one acre with potential. The potential to move toward fence lines and homes. 🔥 Crews kept it small with quick work. Unlike 80 - 90% of all wildfires, this wasn't human-caused. It started when a malfunctioning electrical box on a lighted highway sign dropped sparks into the dry grass below. That’s it. That’s all it takes right now. Stay aware. Stay ready. And don’t underestimate how fast things can go from nothing… to this. 🔥🚒 #westmetrofirerescue

WestMetroFire

30,781 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten