Given how impressed I was with Cursor’s Thermo-Nuclear Code Quality Review skill, I decided to create a similar one, but specifically for animations. /review-animations to review, and /emil-design-eng to build animations. They complement each other well

did you try the normal thermo review too?

Not yet, but I will!

Thank you Emil! I learned more from you on animation than from anyone else in the industry.

why not xd

I had a similar idea - works with cursor sdk or codex sub

thank you very much, will test both. I have also achieved great results from Cursor’s Thermo-Nuclear Code Quality Skill.

glad you like it, have some more fun ones coming too :-)

and you're keep on delivering man !!

This is sick!

How does it differ to /web-animation-design ?

the design eng who left passive aggressive figma comments at 4pm friday just got replaced by a slash command.

A “code review” but for animations is actually a genius workflow idea 👀🔥

The post shows one builder's workflow. What is missing is how these skills compose when multiple run in parallel on the same codebase without context collisions or conflicting edits.

This is the gap nobody talks about. Everyone reviews logic, almost nobody reviews motion, yet janky easing is what makes an app *feel* cheap. Codifying animation taste into a repeatable skill is a genuinely big deal. How are you encoding the "feels right" part?

Thanks man

Great one

Thank you for this

they went fast!!

Were you impressed? Did you write about this experience? I am trying to bolt on something working WELL ENOUGH for PRs, and insanely interested in success stories.

and you keep giving! 🙌🏽🙌🏽

Amazing!

coding on phone is nice for triage but my bottleneck was never the device. it's reviewing what the agent changed.

@emilkowalski Narrow skills like this are the right direction. My test would be brutally concrete output: timestamp/element, motion issue, suggested patch. If the review comes back as an aesthetic essay, it won’t survive real UI work.

This is sick. Which model you recommend to use with it?

Two skills that complement each other instead of one giant prompt. This is good workflow design for Claude Code

Nice

This is Lovely. ❤️

🔥🔥