Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

GPT-5.6 Sol vs Fable 5 both models were tested on the same reasoning with the same prompt > 5.6 Sol one shotted everything in 70 minutes in devin > Fable 5 one-shotted everything in 90 minutes in claude code really surprised by Sol results here which one do you... show more

J A Z I I

9,090 subscribers

79,418 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

49 Kommentare

Profilbild von J A Z I I

J A Z I Ivor 2 Monaten

front test is where fable 5 is really good, decided for yourself both were given same prompt Fable 5 Max Sol 5 Max

Profilbild von J A Z I I

J A Z I Ivor 2 Monaten

on how many tokens each used > fable max used 25% of session limits and 10% weekly limits for both front end and minecraft on 200$ max plan > devin don't have session limits so it used like 20% of weekly limits for both front end and minecraft on 200$ max plan verdict: sol is fast but uses more tokens and give way better results fable is slow but uses less tokens and give good results decide for yourself

Profilbild von Evo

Evovor 2 Monaten

working shadows, wow some minor texture issues on the hand, but other than that i liked sol more

Profilbild von J A Z I I

J A Z I Ivor 2 Monaten

haha yess, villages and alot more was added by sol

Profilbild von Loner -﹏-

Loner -﹏-vor 2 Monaten

what!! 😳 has day/night and even rainfall an inventory too sol definitely won this

Profilbild von J A Z I I

J A Z I Ivor 2 Monaten

yeah, even added mobs and caves too I'll push game on vercel and share link so you guys can test

Profilbild von Loner -﹏-

Loner -﹏-vor 2 Monaten

that would be sickkk

Profilbild von Knowix

Knowixvor 2 Monaten

Sol did well but both were amazing

Profilbild von AshutoshShrivastava

AshutoshShrivastavavor 2 Monaten

Crazy one man ..

Profilbild von J A Z I I

J A Z I Ivor 2 Monaten

Which one do you like?

Profilbild von AshutoshShrivastava

AshutoshShrivastavavor 2 Monaten

Favor had very clear blocks and movement but both are detailed as f.

Profilbild von J A Z I I

J A Z I Ivor 2 Monaten

Ah kk

Profilbild von GUJJU

GUJJUvor 2 Monaten

Gpt more better

Profilbild von J A Z I I

J A Z I Ivor 2 Monaten

Lives up to hype

Profilbild von Jasneet Singh Saini

Jasneet Singh Sainivor 2 Monaten

Chatgpt did a better job overall!

Profilbild von Athrix ☄️

Athrix ☄️vor 2 Monaten

For frontend use too it so good and best

Profilbild von Shikhar

Shikharvor 2 Monaten

Sol cooked

Profilbild von MystiqueMide

MystiqueMidevor 2 Monaten

Gpt 5.6 Sol for me

Profilbild von J A Z I I

J A Z I Ivor 2 Monaten

same, it cooked harder

Profilbild von PrimeNic

PrimeNicvor 2 Monaten

The only SOL that is working right now

Profilbild von Maziar

Maziarvor 2 Monaten

bro is the biggest open ai ambassador haha

Profilbild von J A Z I I

J A Z I Ivor 2 Monaten

hey @thsottiaux can I be ambassador for OpenAI from pak??

Profilbild von Maziar

Maziarvor 2 Monaten

@thsottiaux whoever you are, believe me, you won't find a bigger fan than him

Profilbild von L3o

L3ovor 2 Monaten

i like both

Profilbild von Enissay

Enissayvor 2 Monaten

Yo love to see this, means we are getting more and more great models so we would greatly benefit from the competition!

Profilbild von Veee

Veeevor 2 Monaten

this is close asf

Profilbild von Scott 🚜⏩️

Scott 🚜⏩️vor 2 Monaten

they look well matched but Fable seems to nudge it with more attention to the finer details🧐 but with that said, with some iteration im sure Sol could easily meet the same mark

Profilbild von Jeph

Jephvor 2 Monaten

@LLON3RR Sol defitnely cooked here damnnnn gpt takeover

Profilbild von Adel Bucetta

Adel Bucettavor 2 Monaten

the honest answer is that these models are getting closer to a qualitative advantage, but it's still unclear how they'll perform on edge cases and complex real-world scenarios until we test them there.

Profilbild von 𝐑𝐢𝐫𝐢👾

𝐑𝐢𝐫𝐢👾vor 2 Monaten

SOL definitely won this round but I think fable might just thrive with a different prompt or request.

Profilbild von Farhan

Farhanvor 2 Monaten

OpenAI cooking again

Profilbild von J A Z I I

J A Z I Ivor 2 Monaten

they deserve it sol lives up to hype

Profilbild von Penguin

Penguinvor 2 Monaten

not bad but fable 5 result looks more better for me

Profilbild von Brook

Brookvor 2 Monaten

Sol did good

Profilbild von J A Z I I

J A Z I Ivor 2 Monaten

@Brookcalls really good but not same as fable

Profilbild von aasha

aashavor 2 Monaten

where is tha who was building gta 6

Profilbild von Pawnie

Pawnievor 2 Monaten

Fable literally copied Minecraft's look. Sol, come up with something of his own.

Profilbild von J A Z I I

J A Z I Ivor 2 Monaten

something different and unique

Profilbild von Rivon

Rivonvor 2 Monaten

5.6 sol cooked ngl

Profilbild von MD

MDvor 2 Monaten

What model you using mostly nowadays?

Profilbild von J A Z I I

J A Z I Ivor 2 Monaten

Fable and soln

Profilbild von Dani.pp

Dani.ppvor 2 Monaten

Honestly, I think we’ve reached a point where models already work well. With any of the newer ones, if you keep iterating, you can get almost anything done pretty easily.

Profilbild von MaatWork

MaatWorkvor 2 Monaten

The real variable here is environment scaffolding, not model reasoning. Devin's tool loop bails out faster on ambiguity; Claude Code churns until it hits a wall. The win is whoever fails less silently.

Profilbild von Jz▫️

Jz▫️vor 2 Monaten

really incredible for both

Profilbild von Kenpachey

Kenpacheyvor 2 Monaten

got cooked it hard

Profilbild von nel

nelvor 2 Monaten

5.6 Sol mogged Fable 5 easily

Profilbild von yanixx

yanixxvor 2 Monaten

I like how fable 5 was done better but the speed of chatgpt 5.6 is amazing

Profilbild von max 🎬

max 🎬vor 2 Monaten

oh wow the improvement is crazy

Profilbild von Lars

Larsvor 2 Monaten

70 minutes? CRAZY!! 5.6 def won!

Ähnliche Videos

Fable 5 vs GPT 5.5 tested both on High settings with the same prompt > Fable one shotted everything in 15 minutes and used 3% of weekly limits > GPT 5.5 took 20 minutes and used 3% of weekly limits 5.5 is not looking good here at all which one do you think won?

Fable 5 vs GPT 5.5 tested both on High settings with the same prompt > Fable one shotted everything in 15 minutes and used 3% of weekly limits > GPT 5.5 took 20 minutes and used 3% of weekly limits 5.5 is not looking good here at all which one do you think won?

J A Z I I

107,777 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

This test shows clearly why GPT 5.6 Sol wins I asked the simplest prompt ever : > Create a gmail clone, the nearest possible to the real gmail ui You can see the result, GPT 5.6 Sol and Fable make a 100% perfect But here's the price difference: → GPT 5.6 Terra: $1.04 - 8 minutes → GPT 5.6 Luna: $0.44 - 10 minutes → GPT 5.6 Sol: $6.72 - 20 minutes → Claude Fable 5: $25.09 - 40 minutes Fable is 3.7x more expensive than Sol for "the same result"

This test shows clearly why GPT 5.6 Sol wins I asked the simplest prompt ever : > Create a gmail clone, the nearest possible to the real gmail ui You can see the result, GPT 5.6 Sol and Fable make a 100% perfect But here's the price difference: → GPT 5.6 Terra: $1.04 - 8 minutes → GPT 5.6 Luna: $0.44 - 10 minutes → GPT 5.6 Sol: $6.72 - 20 minutes → Claude Fable 5: $25.09 - 40 minutes Fable is 3.7x more expensive than Sol for "the same result"

Melvyn • Builder

22,254 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

We are officially in the era where one prompt can ship a complete playable game in <50 bucks! Asked Claude Fable 5 and GPT 5.6 Sol to clone Terraria, max effort level Both are playable and offer a smooth experience GPT 5.6 Sol did it at roughly 1/4 the cost and in 2/3 the runtime: - GPT 5.6 Sol: ~$35, ~1h 20m - Claude Fable 5: ~$120, ~2h Tho Fable still produced the strongest results 🥲

We are officially in the era where one prompt can ship a complete playable game in <50 bucks! Asked Claude Fable 5 and GPT 5.6 Sol to clone Terraria, max effort level Both are playable and offer a smooth experience GPT 5.6 Sol did it at roughly 1/4 the cost and in 2/3 the runtime: - GPT 5.6 Sol: ~$35, ~1h 20m - Claude Fable 5: ~$120, ~2h Tho Fable still produced the strongest results 🥲

GMI Cloud

130,582 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

GPT-5.6 Sol vs Fable 5. I put both through my hardest frontend test: a 3D globe dashboard. Same prompt. Same reference image. Sol on the left. Fable on the right. GPT-5.6 Sol is a major leap from 5.5. Fable 5 still wins on spacing, balance, and first-pass polish. For me, Sol comes close at half the cost.

GPT-5.6 Sol vs Fable 5. I put both through my hardest frontend test: a 3D globe dashboard. Same prompt. Same reference image. Sol on the left. Fable on the right. GPT-5.6 Sol is a major leap from 5.5. Fable 5 still wins on spacing, balance, and first-pass polish. For me, Sol comes close at half the cost.

Kai

199,524 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Kimi K3 beating Fable and Sol on price and quality. Command Code's internal flappy bench results are in. Really impressed with the results. For Kimi K3 we set the gameplay to hard while Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol were set to easier. Cost breakdown: • Kimi K3: $0.024 •Fable 5: $0.42 •GPT-5.6 Sol: $0.15 Ranking based on DX & features: •Kimi K3: 8/10 •Fable 5: 7.5/10 • GPT-5.6 Sol: 7/10 GPT 5.6 Sol max can definitely go on longer and wins the game overall, but that's something different. Grok 4.5 beats GPT 5.6 Sol on that, lol.Mm-hmm.

Kimi K3 beating Fable and Sol on price and quality. Command Code's internal flappy bench results are in. Really impressed with the results. For Kimi K3 we set the gameplay to hard while Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol were set to easier. Cost breakdown: • Kimi K3: $0.024 •Fable 5: $0.42 •GPT-5.6 Sol: $0.15 Ranking based on DX & features: •Kimi K3: 8/10 •Fable 5: 7.5/10 • GPT-5.6 Sol: 7/10 GPT 5.6 Sol max can definitely go on longer and wins the game overall, but that's something different. Grok 4.5 beats GPT 5.6 Sol on that, lol.Mm-hmm.

Ahmad Awais

255,237 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Kimi K3 just 3 shotted a whole walkable voxel town with drivable cars — Voxelville, around $3.24 in API usage. The same token cost would be $10.80 with Fable 5 and $6 with GPT 5.6 Sol. Fable 5 built its own Maplewood, GPT 5.6 Sol built Willowwick, but on price/quality Kimi K3 just cooked both of them. The era of free indie game development is closer than you think!

Kimi K3 just 3 shotted a whole walkable voxel town with drivable cars — Voxelville, around $3.24 in API usage. The same token cost would be $10.80 with Fable 5 and $6 with GPT 5.6 Sol. Fable 5 built its own Maplewood, GPT 5.6 Sol built Willowwick, but on price/quality Kimi K3 just cooked both of them. The era of free indie game development is closer than you think!

Kirill

65,087 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Tested FlappyBench with GLM 5.3, Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol 3 models. Same prompt with /design command. Scored on features, UX/UI, and cost. 🔹 Fable 5 → 9.5/10 · $0.420 🔹 GLM 5.3 → 9/10 · $0.018 🔹 GPT-5.6 Sol → 9/10 · $0.150 Results: → Fable 5 wins on quality, but costs 23x more than GLM 5.3 → GLM 5.3 gives better output than GPT 5.6 Sol at 8x cheaper → Optimizing for cost? Go for GLM 5.3. Otherwise, Fable 5 if quality matters

Tested FlappyBench with GLM 5.3, Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol 3 models. Same prompt with /design command. Scored on features, UX/UI, and cost. 🔹 Fable 5 → 9.5/10 · $0.420 🔹 GLM 5.3 → 9/10 · $0.018 🔹 GPT-5.6 Sol → 9/10 · $0.150 Results: → Fable 5 wins on quality, but costs 23x more than GLM 5.3 → GLM 5.3 gives better output than GPT 5.6 Sol at 8x cheaper → Optimizing for cost? Go for GLM 5.3. Otherwise, Fable 5 if quality matters

Command Code

22,827 Aufrufe • vor 28 Tagen

Did GPT-5.6 Sol beat Fable 5 for frontend work? GPT-5.5 got roasted for its frontend. Had to test the new one. Same challenge: one prompt + one reference image → Three.js 3D globe dashboard. Verdict: Fable 5 still edges it out. But at half the cost, GPT-5.6 Sol is a serious option now.

Did GPT-5.6 Sol beat Fable 5 for frontend work? GPT-5.5 got roasted for its frontend. Had to test the new one. Same challenge: one prompt + one reference image → Three.js 3D globe dashboard. Verdict: Fable 5 still edges it out. But at half the cost, GPT-5.6 Sol is a serious option now.

Kai

21,502 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

GLM 5.2 vs Kimi K2.7 both were tested on same settings with same prompt > GLM one shotted everything in 35 mins > Kimi needed extra prompts to fix movements and took 30 mins super surpised by how good GLM 5.2 is, while being so cheap which one do you think won?

GLM 5.2 vs Kimi K2.7 both were tested on same settings with same prompt > GLM one shotted everything in 35 mins > Kimi needed extra prompts to fix movements and took 30 mins super surpised by how good GLM 5.2 is, while being so cheap which one do you think won?

J A Z I I

63,741 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Kimi K3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol vs Fable 5 Three top-tier models. Same /design prompt across all. Parameters reviewed: Pace, design sense, gameplay feel Result: Kimi K3 nails the design sense and knows exactly what to add in-game. Pace and gameplay held up well. Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol both play too fast, video isn't sped up. Ranking (DX, Features & Cost): → Kimi K3: 9.5/10 · $0.030 → Fable 5: 7.5/10 · $0.38 → GPT-5.6 Sol: 7/10 · $0.11

Kimi K3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol vs Fable 5 Three top-tier models. Same /design prompt across all. Parameters reviewed: Pace, design sense, gameplay feel Result: Kimi K3 nails the design sense and knows exactly what to add in-game. Pace and gameplay held up well. Fable 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol both play too fast, video isn't sped up. Ranking (DX, Features & Cost): → Kimi K3: 9.5/10 · $0.030 → Fable 5: 7.5/10 · $0.38 → GPT-5.6 Sol: 7/10 · $0.11

Command Code

377,252 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Opus 4.8 vs MiniMax M3 tested both on default settings with the same prompt > Opus one shotted everything in 7 minutes > M3 needed an extra prompt to fix the "break block" feature and took 20+ minutes both got super close, judge both and lemme know which one looks better?

Opus 4.8 vs MiniMax M3 tested both on default settings with the same prompt > Opus one shotted everything in 7 minutes > M3 needed an extra prompt to fix the "break block" feature and took 20+ minutes both got super close, judge both and lemme know which one looks better?

J A Z I I

67,862 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3 Tested both models with the same prompt at the highest reasoning level available. > Fable took 18 minutes to complete this test and cost $12.60 > Kimi K3 took 10 minutes and cost around $6.95 Which one wins here?

Fable 5.1 vs Kimi K3 Tested both models with the same prompt at the highest reasoning level available. > Fable took 18 minutes to complete this test and cost $12.60 > Kimi K3 took 10 minutes and cost around $6.95 Which one wins here?

Bhavy☄️

147,501 Aufrufe • vor 10 Tagen

Fable Ultracode vs GPT 5.6 Sol Ultra Frontend design comparison test First website is from Fable Fable took 5min vs GPT took 30min Which one do you think is better?

Fable Ultracode vs GPT 5.6 Sol Ultra Frontend design comparison test First website is from Fable Fable took 5min vs GPT took 30min Which one do you think is better?

Jun Song

22,829 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Previewing Ultrafast mode for OpenAI's GPT 5.6 Sol, powered by Cerebras. GPT-5.6 Sol Ultrafast generates responses at up to 750 tokens per second. That's the full, GPT-5.6-Sol model -- up to 14× faster than the same model on Standard processing. It speedran Humanity’s Last Exam in 11h 11m, nearly 7× faster than Claude Fable 5 with comparable accuracy.

Previewing Ultrafast mode for OpenAI's GPT 5.6 Sol, powered by Cerebras. GPT-5.6 Sol Ultrafast generates responses at up to 750 tokens per second. That's the full, GPT-5.6-Sol model -- up to 14× faster than the same model on Standard processing. It speedran Humanity’s Last Exam in 11h 11m, nearly 7× faster than Claude Fable 5 with comparable accuracy.

Cerebras

1,287,419 Aufrufe • vor 29 Tagen

Grok 4.6 High vs Opus 5 High vs Fable 5 High vs GPT 5.6 sol High > 3D model of an Airbus H145 helicopter in Three js

Grok 4.6 High vs Opus 5 High vs Fable 5 High vs GPT 5.6 sol High > 3D model of an Airbus H145 helicopter in Three js

Harshith

124,067 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

this is f**king insane Fable 5 goes away in 24 hours from Claude Code and someone just figured out how to get fable 5 reasoning in GPT 5.6 Sol with one prompt you have less than 24 hours to set this up as this takes away 20% of your usage limit here is how: 1) Paste the prompt and ask it to "make an operating manual" 2) Go the Codex App > Settings > Personalisation > Custom Instructions 3) Use GPT 5.5 / GPT 5.6 and now you have Fable 5 reasoning at 1/3 th the price save and bookmark it no matter what

this is f**king insane Fable 5 goes away in 24 hours from Claude Code and someone just figured out how to get fable 5 reasoning in GPT 5.6 Sol with one prompt you have less than 24 hours to set this up as this takes away 20% of your usage limit here is how: 1) Paste the prompt and ask it to "make an operating manual" 2) Go the Codex App > Settings > Personalisation > Custom Instructions 3) Use GPT 5.5 / GPT 5.6 and now you have Fable 5 reasoning at 1/3 th the price save and bookmark it no matter what

Avid

57,544 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Claude Fable 5 vs Codex 5.6 Sol gave each model the identical prompt: "create nike's member welcome flow, 12 emails, using nitrosend." one shot, no edits. which one's better?

Claude Fable 5 vs Codex 5.6 Sol gave each model the identical prompt: "create nike's member welcome flow, 12 emails, using nitrosend." one shot, no edits. which one's better?

George Hartley ☄️

94,338 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Kimi K3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol. I reused the 3D globe test from Kimi vs Fable 5. Same prompt. Same reference image. Kimi K3 left. GPT-5.6 Sol right. Kimi edges out Sol on UI fidelity and globe realism. At current API prices, Kimi is about 50% cheaper. For frontend work, it's my pick.

Kimi K3 vs GPT-5.6 Sol. I reused the 3D globe test from Kimi vs Fable 5. Same prompt. Same reference image. Kimi K3 left. GPT-5.6 Sol right. Kimi edges out Sol on UI fidelity and globe realism. At current API prices, Kimi is about 50% cheaper. For frontend work, it's my pick.

Kai

15,769 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

GPT-5.6 Sol just one-shotted a full Minecraft clone in 90 minutes. Not iterated on for weeks — one shot, 90 minutes, done. We went from "AI can write a snake game" to "AI can rebuild a billion-dollar sandbox genre".

GPT-5.6 Sol just one-shotted a full Minecraft clone in 90 minutes. Not iterated on for weeks — one shot, 90 minutes, done. We went from "AI can write a snake game" to "AI can rebuild a billion-dollar sandbox genre".

0xMarioNawfal

81,699 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

this is f**king gold someone just figured out how to run Claude Fable 5 and GPT 5.6 Sol in the same loop gpt-5.6 came out yesterday. fable 5 leaves in 48 hours. this window has never existed before and never will again. here is how to use it: 1. open claude code. install openai's codex plugin 2. type /model. choose fable 5. 3. drop one ROUTING.md in your repo root (full file in comments). 4.paste the prompt (in comments), write what feature you want. boom. save and bookmark this no matter what. it will be the most productive thing you do this weekend

this is f**king gold someone just figured out how to run Claude Fable 5 and GPT 5.6 Sol in the same loop gpt-5.6 came out yesterday. fable 5 leaves in 48 hours. this window has never existed before and never will again. here is how to use it: 1. open claude code. install openai's codex plugin 2. type /model. choose fable 5. 3. drop one ROUTING.md in your repo root (full file in comments). 4.paste the prompt (in comments), write what feature you want. boom. save and bookmark this no matter what. it will be the most productive thing you do this weekend

Avid

140,354 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten