Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Grill tools Umbrellas Multi-tools Flashlights Camp chairs Insulated dog bowls 10x10’ pop-up canopies $200 fishing poles instead of $20 "disposable" ones There is just one problem...

45,476 просмотров • 2 лет назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 11

Фото профиля Chris Koerner
Chris Koerner2 лет назад

Why isn't anyone copying Yeti's playbook? It's clearly proven: Find a boring, ignored product & offer something 3x higher quality for 10x the price. $50 tumblers are fine. Why not a $500 one? We use them daily & the market is massive. You could do this with:

Фото профиля Chris Koerner
Chris Koerner2 лет назад

Yeti is already trying to do this with many of the products above. But they won’t be known for it. They’re known for amazing coolers. They've sold out to private equity now. Their private equity is your opportunity. Many DTC brands are half-heartedly trying this by simply...

Фото профиля Chris Koerner
Chris Koerner2 лет назад

...selling expensive commodities on a nice website, but you have to nail the quality in the marketing. Someone needs to be known for amazing $300 camp chairs that last a lifetime. If I were doing this I'd...

Фото профиля Chris Koerner
Chris Koerner2 лет назад

...listen to every podcast and read every article from the Yeti founders, and scour their original website on the web archive. yeticoolers . com used to look like the screenshot below! Opportunities are everywhere...but you have to start somewhere.

Фото профиля Chris Koerner
Chris Koerner2 лет назад

Would love your follow @mhp_guy if you like stuff like this.

Фото профиля Troy Walker, CPA
Troy Walker, CPA2 лет назад

$200 for a fishing pole is already one of the cheap ones 😅fishing and boating industry has gotten so expensive the last decade or so.

Фото профиля Grant Hewit
Grant Hewit2 лет назад

Umbrellas already covered -

Фото профиля Chris Johnston
Chris Johnston2 лет назад

Acting like Leatherman doesn't exist

Фото профиля Adopt Dogs!
Adopt Dogs!2 лет назад

@CharlieBerens is spot on #Midwest #Flannel

Фото профиля Preston
Preston2 лет назад

These have all been done. But if you found another product the idea makes sense

Фото профиля rsiever24
rsiever242 лет назад

Shibumi has the high-end canopy market on lock-down.

Похожие видео

your agent has thirty tools. it calls two of them. the other twenty eight are not sitting idle somewhere. they are in the request, every request, and they are doing damage in two places at once. first the obvious one. tool schemas go into the prompt, and a schema is not a name. it is a description, a parameter list, types, required fields, an example. thirty of those is a few thousand tokens that ship with every single call, including the ones where the agent just says thanks and stops. you are paying rent on twenty eight tools that have never fired. second, and this is the one that costs more. when the request says cancel the order, the model picks by matching against everything available. four of your tools are plausible: cancel_order, refund_order, update_order, void_order. it is choosing among them based on the descriptions you wrote, one afternoon, months ago. every tool you add is another candidate in that shortlist. the twenty eight you never call are not neutral. they are noise in the one decision that determines whether the run works. > why it grows without anyone deciding to nobody adds thirty tools on purpose. you add one for a task, it works, it stays. six months later the registry is a catalogue and no one has ever removed anything, because removing a tool feels risky and adding one feels free. and there is no feedback telling you otherwise. the unused ones never error. they never appear in a failing trace. they are invisible in exactly the way that lets them accumulate. > what to actually do count calls per tool over the last thousand runs. this is one group-by and it usually shocks people. the ones at zero are pure cost. ship the tools the task needs, not the whole registry. a research phase does not need deploy. a writing phase does not need the database. swap the set between phases instead of loading everything up front. same agent, different tools, depending on where the run is. and when two tools could both plausibly answer the same request, that is not redundancy you can ignore. it is a coin flip you built into the system. the twenty eight tools are not unused. they are used every time, by the part of the run you cannot see.

Hanako

24,656 просмотров • 9 дней назад

“blank canvas problem” figma says raw and unformed feelings… this should not be shared. * Look, I love AI! I lead and design products for AI & Data Solutions in one of the largest firms in the world. I use these tools every day. I’m one of the biggest advocates of AI. I do NOT fear it. I leverage it. I appreciate what Figma is trying to do here. Good intentions to help designers build faster. Make the design easier and accessible for everyone. And of course, meanwhile, profit from It. it is a business after all and it is perfectly fine. While I was watching Dylan generate detailed designs from a prompt, I started seeing aspiring designers getting attached to these tools and having everything easy, ready, quick… and a series of questions started to arise in my mind; * ➟ Are we going to see a generation of designers who lack resilience and love/appreciation for craft? ➟ Designers who are easily hurt and seek help from AI tools every time a client raises a criticism for the proposed design? ➟ Are these designers going to blame AI tools for the outcome and not take accountability for it? ➟ Perhaps they will go back to the AI input and generate 20+ options for clients in 5 mins without thinking instead of talking to the client, understanding the product positioning and actually thinking/exploring/working for the best design solution? ➟ Are we going to see lazier designers? and weak, giving up, getting frustrated easily? * Dylan says ”This tool helps us to get past the blank canvas problem” Blank canvas is one of the best parts of this work. A new fresh start with endless possibilities. Staring at the blank screen and reflecting on our past experiences, our conversations with the client, transforming these thoughts on screen pixel by pixel… That’s how we truly understand the problem at hand and grow as designers. You may say I’m being a romantic, trying to stay in the past. No. Again, I build these tools and encourage everyone to leverage them. However, yes, I have concerns. Not about the efficiencies this technology brings, Concerns about; AI may raise a generation of weak-minded designers who lack an appreciation for the craft. * It is 2:14 am, I should go to sleep. I should not share this writing. this is not meant to be for others but for me. just thinking in writing… thinking…. thinking… …

Oykun

38,358 просмотров • 2 лет назад