Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Hamas’s Desired End State & Two-State Solution Hamas officials told Drop Site’s Jeremy Scahill that the group’s preferred long-term vision is a single democratic state across all of historic Palestine—a vision they describe as a rejection of ethno-supremacy, not a call for expulsion or exclusion. It stands in stark...

141,200 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

2 Yorum

Drop Site profil fotoğrafı
Drop Site1 yıl önce

🔗 Full show:

Pour me Another profil fotoğrafı
Pour me Another1 yıl önce

Hamas wants a more equitable and inclusive path to peace, than any plan proposed ever proposed by Israel!

Benzer Videolar

Hamas leader Khaled Mashal: “We do not accept the two state solution.” — January 22, 2024 “I would like to say two things about the two-state solution. First, we have nothing to do with the two-state solution. We reject this notion, because it means you would get a promise for a [Palestinian] state, yet you are required to recognize the legitimacy of the other state, which is the Zionist entity. This is unacceptable. We demand to be liberated, to get rid of the occupation, and to have our independence, and our state. [Israel] is my enemy. It is not my concern." “Obviously, the position of Hamas, and the position of the vast majority of the Palestinian people, especially following October 7, I believe that the dream and the hope for Palestine from the River to the Sea, and from the north to the south, has been renewed. This has also become a slogan chanted in the U.S., and in western capital cities, by the American and Western public.” “Hamas agreed to a completely independent (Palestinian) state, with the 1967 borders, with Jerusalem as its capital, with the Right of Return included without recognizing the legitimacy of the Zionist entity. This position was meant to facilitate Palestinian and Arab agreement at this stage, but without relinquishing any of our rights or any part of our land, and without recognizing Israel. Our vision remains unchanged. I believe that October 7 has enhanced this conviction, has narrowed the disagreements, and has turned the idea of liberating Palestine from the River to the Sea into a realistic idea that has already begun. It is not something merely to be expected or hoped for, It is part of the plan, part of the agenda, and we are standing on its threshold, Allah willing.” TRANSLATED BY MEMRI Source:

dan linnaeus

96,479 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

🟢 The claim by NY Governor Kathy Hochul that Hamas “calls for the genocide of Jews” is incorrect and does not indicate the group’s actual political positions and actions. Hamas’s foundational charter from 1988 contained explicit antisemitic conspiracy theory and religiously generalized anti-Jewish language, but that document has since been superseded by later political documents and practice. In 2017, the group issued a new political document that explicitly distinguishes between Jews as a religious group and Zionism as a political project, stating that its conflict is with Israeli occupation, not Jews as such. Hamas leaders have long described their struggle as one seeking self-determination, territorial and political in nature, aimed at ending Israel’s illegal occupation of Palestinian land, not exterminating a people. Senior Hamas official Osama Hamdan told Drop Site in May 2025: “We've said clearly, we are a people under occupation. We are not fighting just because we like to fight or it's a good idea to fight others. We are not fighting the Israelis because, for example, they are Jewish people. We don't have a problem with the Jewish people,” he said. “Even if a Muslim came to occupy my land, I will fight him. It is not related to the religion. It is related to being an occupier or not an occupier.” There is no credible evidence Hamas has pursued a coherent, operational program to exterminate Jews as a people globally or within Israel. Its military operations, including on October 7, and however unlawful under international law, have not been directed at Jews as an ethnic or religious group. This distinction is also reflected in Hamas’s ongoing legal challenge to its terrorism designation in the UK. In submissions reviewed by Drop Site News in April 2025, Hamas’s legal team acknowledges that its actions fall within the broad statutory definition of terrorism under British law, while arguing that the definition is so expansive it would also encompass the conduct of state militaries engaged in political violence. Equating armed resistance to an illegal occupation with genocidal intent also misuses the term “genocide,” which has a specific meaning under international law requiring demonstrable intent to destroy a group as such. Asserting genocidal intent furthers a dehumanizing narrative that shuts down serious discussion of what Hamas actually is: a Palestinian nationalist Islamic liberation movement combining political organization, governance, and armed resistance in an asymmetrical war against a state actor intent on exterminating Palestinians and occupying their land. 🎥 Senior Hamas official Osama Hamdan speaking to Jeremy Scahill, May 2025.

Drop Site

114,564 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Jeremy Scahill maps the regional chessboard, outlining the spheres of influence that have taken shape under U.S. dominance, and how each power has positioned itself around the question of Palestine. Egypt and Turkey, Scahill says, don’t want Hamas destroyed outright. As the second-largest recipient of U.S. military aid, and the state bordering Gaza and its only crossing to the outside world, Egypt sees advantage in keeping Hamas “severely weakened but not destroyed.” Preserving a limited Palestinian resistance preserves Cairo’s leverage with Washington and Tel Aviv, and reinforces its indispensability in “managing” Gaza. Ankara, under Erdoğan, positions itself as a bridge between NATO, Europe, and the Middle East, cultivating diplomatic reach and leveraging it for economic interests. Scahill points out that Erdoğan and Trump share a transactional worldview: both treat foreign policy as an extension of business. Scahill explains that Saudi Arabia and the UAE orbit a different sphere. They both see Hamas and Palestinian resistance as a dangerous mirror, reflecting what their own people could become if they turned their anger inward and want Israel to finish Hamas because of the movement’s popular appeal. Behind their nods to a two-state solution lies a quiet support for Israel’s ongoing genocide in Gaza – an expectation that the destruction of Hamas will also extinguish a model of defiance that exposes their moral bankruptcy and political fragility. BreakThrough News | jeremy scahill | Rania Khalek | @ZoPepperC

Drop Site

25,192 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce