Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Harry was 12 yrs old when his mother died. He has claimed several times that he has very few memories of life with his mother-and as a child, there’s no WAY he could have processed and understood what was going on-so as an adult to act like he can... compare his mothers experience to his is a joke. Britain has a free press. I don’t know why he thinks his grandmother or father can tell them what to print-and while I’m sure there were some things they said that weren’t true, unfortunately for #HarryandMeghan a lot of it WAS true-they just didn’t like it coming out. Leaving wouldn’t have stopped the “barrage”, as we have see , it actually increased it. Stepping back wouldnt have stopped press coverage-that’s why that reason is a lie. They left because #MeghanMarkle never intended on staying-she always planned on moving back to CA with her shiny new title and monetizing it. They were in talks with Oprah since 2018. They signed the Netflix deal in Sep 2020-those things take months and months to negotiate. Same with Spotify in 2020 and the Disney voiceover in Jan 2020. #HarryandMeghanAreLiars #MeghanMarkleExposedshow more

Princess CarParkle 👑

23,796 subscribers

82,368 views • 9 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

This man went to a local grocery store and he got what he thought was a vegan sandwich. However the sandwich on it has mayo on it and he stated that the mayo isn’t vegan and wants his money back. In fact he wants his money back for 4 sandwiches because this is the 4th time this has happened to him when he ordered this sandwich, it had mayo on it. Given that every time he orders this sandwich and he doesn’t tell them no mayo, and the sandwich is always made with mayo on it, why is he surprised it has mayo on it when it’s literally in the sandwich description. He then claims they set him up to get angry so they could toss him out, was the store wrong for selling a “vegan” sandwich with mayo on it or should he have specified he didn’t want it on there?

This man went to a local grocery store and he got what he thought was a vegan sandwich. However the sandwich on it has mayo on it and he stated that the mayo isn’t vegan and wants his money back. In fact he wants his money back for 4 sandwiches because this is the 4th time this has happened to him when he ordered this sandwich, it had mayo on it. Given that every time he orders this sandwich and he doesn’t tell them no mayo, and the sandwich is always made with mayo on it, why is he surprised it has mayo on it when it’s literally in the sandwich description. He then claims they set him up to get angry so they could toss him out, was the store wrong for selling a “vegan” sandwich with mayo on it or should he have specified he didn’t want it on there?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

41,159 views • 3 months ago

One thing #MeghanMarkle has consistently shown is that she’s incapable of directly answering a question. Oprah asks her if leaving was the plan all along. Instead of answering it, she goes on about how she “left my career”-Rachel Zane was being written out of the show before Harry was in the picture. This “career” was waning which is why she was so desperate for Harry to publicly announce they were dating. She wrote the family letters they probably couldn’t read because her handwriting is illegible. We know, however, that they did NOT leave with “no plan”. She was in talks with Oprah as early as 2018. In early 2019, they were negotiating with Quibi, then moved on to Netflix where they eventually signed in Sep 2020. Spotify was a few months later-but these contracts take MONTHS to negotiate and finalize, so they were absolutely in talks before they announced they were leaving. No one can convince me they didn’t plan every step. Going to Canada before they went to the US? Planned. Idk if Harry or Archie had to wait for immigration/passport issues but Canada was planned. So was LA. This is when she starts complaining that nobody made sure she knew “God Save the Queen” and nobody gave her Royal lessons-why didn’t her huzzband Aitch make sure she knew the anthem? It’s not that hard, btw-for the US people it’s the same tune as “My Country ‘Tis of Thee” and I’d think memorizing lines would come easy to the actor. The Queen gave her Samantha Cohen, but Markle knew everything and didn’t need her help. #MeghanMarkleExposed #HarryandMeghan

One thing #MeghanMarkle has consistently shown is that she’s incapable of directly answering a question. Oprah asks her if leaving was the plan all along. Instead of answering it, she goes on about how she “left my career”-Rachel Zane was being written out of the show before Harry was in the picture. This “career” was waning which is why she was so desperate for Harry to publicly announce they were dating. She wrote the family letters they probably couldn’t read because her handwriting is illegible. We know, however, that they did NOT leave with “no plan”. She was in talks with Oprah as early as 2018. In early 2019, they were negotiating with Quibi, then moved on to Netflix where they eventually signed in Sep 2020. Spotify was a few months later-but these contracts take MONTHS to negotiate and finalize, so they were absolutely in talks before they announced they were leaving. No one can convince me they didn’t plan every step. Going to Canada before they went to the US? Planned. Idk if Harry or Archie had to wait for immigration/passport issues but Canada was planned. So was LA. This is when she starts complaining that nobody made sure she knew “God Save the Queen” and nobody gave her Royal lessons-why didn’t her huzzband Aitch make sure she knew the anthem? It’s not that hard, btw-for the US people it’s the same tune as “My Country ‘Tis of Thee” and I’d think memorizing lines would come easy to the actor. The Queen gave her Samantha Cohen, but Markle knew everything and didn’t need her help. #MeghanMarkleExposed #HarryandMeghan

Princess CarParkle 👑

59,427 views • 9 months ago

We’re back at the Oprah LieFest-#HarryandMeghan claim they did not blindside the Queen with the announcement that they were “stepping back”. Harry says-now don’t laugh too loud-that he’s got “too much respect” for his grandmother to do that. Harry says that hThey knew the press had caught wind of it and had to get ahead of it. It was NOT planned. Also, putting the plan in writing for his father is a far cry from telling the Queen. Having conversations with her Majesty 2 or 3 times is different from making a public statement. #HarryAndMeghanAreLiars #MeghanMarkleExposed #Nřť

We’re back at the Oprah LieFest-#HarryandMeghan claim they did not blindside the Queen with the announcement that they were “stepping back”. Harry says-now don’t laugh too loud-that he’s got “too much respect” for his grandmother to do that. Harry says that hThey knew the press had caught wind of it and had to get ahead of it. It was NOT planned. Also, putting the plan in writing for his father is a far cry from telling the Queen. Having conversations with her Majesty 2 or 3 times is different from making a public statement. #HarryAndMeghanAreLiars #MeghanMarkleExposed #Nřť

Princess CarParkle 👑

63,855 views • 9 months ago

Tucker’s mother abandoned him and his brother Buckley when he was 6. Tucker in his own words said his mother wasn’t a fan of his or his brother’s, which is why she chose to flee the country to escape them when they were little. Looking back, we can all see what Tucker’s mother was running away from. Her children are literal demons. I’ve attached a clip from 4 years ago where Tucker admits as a child his mother “wasn’t a fan”. Imagine how terrible he must have been back then for his own mother to say “I’m not a fan! Bye!” Tucker’s father was an avowed Christian Zionist who loved Israel and openly condemned Islam. It’s clear Tucker has major mommy issues and since his mother left, and his father loved Israel, Tucker is lashing out at things his father loved before he recently died so he can try to get even with things and places that consumed his father’s attention, which Tucker wasn’t receiving from his mom. Tucker is basically trying to lash out for attention in his adult life because he was never given enough attention. Sadly, his father recently passed away over the last year. I truly believe Tucker Carlson is trying to destroy everything that his father loved because Tucker himself felt so unloved as a child. Every sociopathic man, every narcissistic man and every evil man has a form of Mommy issues. We are all being held hostage by Tucker as he deals with his mommy issues in the later stages of his life now that both of his parents have passed away. Any psychotherapist would likely say the same thing.

Tucker’s mother abandoned him and his brother Buckley when he was 6. Tucker in his own words said his mother wasn’t a fan of his or his brother’s, which is why she chose to flee the country to escape them when they were little. Looking back, we can all see what Tucker’s mother was running away from. Her children are literal demons. I’ve attached a clip from 4 years ago where Tucker admits as a child his mother “wasn’t a fan”. Imagine how terrible he must have been back then for his own mother to say “I’m not a fan! Bye!” Tucker’s father was an avowed Christian Zionist who loved Israel and openly condemned Islam. It’s clear Tucker has major mommy issues and since his mother left, and his father loved Israel, Tucker is lashing out at things his father loved before he recently died so he can try to get even with things and places that consumed his father’s attention, which Tucker wasn’t receiving from his mom. Tucker is basically trying to lash out for attention in his adult life because he was never given enough attention. Sadly, his father recently passed away over the last year. I truly believe Tucker Carlson is trying to destroy everything that his father loved because Tucker himself felt so unloved as a child. Every sociopathic man, every narcissistic man and every evil man has a form of Mommy issues. We are all being held hostage by Tucker as he deals with his mommy issues in the later stages of his life now that both of his parents have passed away. Any psychotherapist would likely say the same thing.

Laura Loomer

1,529,706 views • 5 months ago

Michael Porter Jr. clarifies his Andrew Tate comment when he said sometimes he plays Andrew Tate around women to see their reaction. He added that he experienced a similar backlash as Andrew Tate when he refused to take the COVID-19 vaccine, saying they put allegations on you when you are speaking facts “They put my dawg in jail with no proof he did any of that… They tried to say he trafficked them, but we don’t know. We know that they will put allegations on the people that are speaking too much facts… But his underlying message, like now, when I watch any of his stuff, he just likes to speak pretty true. Now he has has a platform; he’s not doing all that wild stuff… When I didn’t get the vaccine, all of a sudden they started talking crazy about me. They tried to make me sound i’m slow or stupid because I didn’t get the vaccine. Now you fast forward a couple years later, now everybody wishes they didn’t get the vaccine… All this research coming out about why it was harmful for you all, a lot of scientists have come out and said there’s no way clinically that they could be out a safe vaccine within 6 months. The vaccine was not safe to take, and it caused a lot of harm. I didn’t want to put it in my body for my own reasons, but when I didn’t, they started putting all this crazy labels on me that just weren’t true. So I have experienced it personally that they can literally create any narrative they want about someone.” (via The Emily Austin Show)

Michael Porter Jr. clarifies his Andrew Tate comment when he said sometimes he plays Andrew Tate around women to see their reaction. He added that he experienced a similar backlash as Andrew Tate when he refused to take the COVID-19 vaccine, saying they put allegations on you when you are speaking facts “They put my dawg in jail with no proof he did any of that… They tried to say he trafficked them, but we don’t know. We know that they will put allegations on the people that are speaking too much facts… But his underlying message, like now, when I watch any of his stuff, he just likes to speak pretty true. Now he has has a platform; he’s not doing all that wild stuff… When I didn’t get the vaccine, all of a sudden they started talking crazy about me. They tried to make me sound i’m slow or stupid because I didn’t get the vaccine. Now you fast forward a couple years later, now everybody wishes they didn’t get the vaccine… All this research coming out about why it was harmful for you all, a lot of scientists have come out and said there’s no way clinically that they could be out a safe vaccine within 6 months. The vaccine was not safe to take, and it caused a lot of harm. I didn’t want to put it in my body for my own reasons, but when I didn’t, they started putting all this crazy labels on me that just weren’t true. So I have experienced it personally that they can literally create any narrative they want about someone.” (via The Emily Austin Show)

FearBuck

1,036,908 views • 5 months ago

Howard Hawks on his meeting with Al Capone & what Capone and another famous Chicago gangster thought about 'Scarface' (1932) when they saw the film: "Interviewer: Did you have any contact with Al Capone while making the picture? Hawks: While we were making 'Scarface' (1932), five or six of them came out and said, “The boss wants us to see the picture.” And I said, “You go and tell him when it comes out, he can pay a dollar and buy a ticket. You don’t scare me. Why the hell don’t you come out and just ask to see it?” They reported to Capone that it was just great, and they invited me to Chicago to see him. They met me at the train, and they were late. One of the fellows said, “There was a killing last night and we had to go to the funeral.” I said, “Do I have to ride with you if there was a killing last night?” They said I could ride in a different car. But when we went into a café, they would sit with their backs to the wall, and I had my back to the door. We had some damn good-looking girls with us, a bit brassy but very pretty. When I saw Capone, we had tea, and he was dressed in a morning coat, striped trousers, a carnation, being a very nice man, saying how much he liked the picture. I was with him two, three hours. Then he asked me to come again, and I stopped by there. But there was a shooting in Chicago, so they said that he couldn’t come because he was hiding out in Atlantic City or something. Then he came to see me when I was working in Hollywood, and the cops came and arrested him right on the set. Interviewer: So he did see 'Scarface'? Hawks: Five or six times. He had his own print of it. He thought it was great. He’d say, “Jesus Christ, you guys got a lot of stuff in that picture! How’d you know about that?” I said, “Look—you know how somebody can’t testify if he’s a lawyer? Well, I’m a lawyer.” And he laughed. He didn’t give a damn. Another famous gangster brought two very lovely daughters out to watch the movie and introduced himself to me. He said, “Where’d you get that stuff in that killing?” I asked him, “Why? Are you mad?” He said, “No, I’m just curious.” I told him, and he laughed, and he said, “That’s the way we did the shooting. Why hasn’t the picture played in Chicago?” I said, “They won’t let me.” He said, “Do you want it to play?” I said yeah. And he said, “Can I use your phone a minute?” When he finished he said, “You can play it any time you want.” ('Hawks on Hawks', Joseph McBride, 1982) P.S: On this day, 94 years ago, 'Scarface' (1932) premiered in New Orleans, Luisiana.

Howard Hawks on his meeting with Al Capone & what Capone and another famous Chicago gangster thought about 'Scarface' (1932) when they saw the film: "Interviewer: Did you have any contact with Al Capone while making the picture? Hawks: While we were making 'Scarface' (1932), five or six of them came out and said, “The boss wants us to see the picture.” And I said, “You go and tell him when it comes out, he can pay a dollar and buy a ticket. You don’t scare me. Why the hell don’t you come out and just ask to see it?” They reported to Capone that it was just great, and they invited me to Chicago to see him. They met me at the train, and they were late. One of the fellows said, “There was a killing last night and we had to go to the funeral.” I said, “Do I have to ride with you if there was a killing last night?” They said I could ride in a different car. But when we went into a café, they would sit with their backs to the wall, and I had my back to the door. We had some damn good-looking girls with us, a bit brassy but very pretty. When I saw Capone, we had tea, and he was dressed in a morning coat, striped trousers, a carnation, being a very nice man, saying how much he liked the picture. I was with him two, three hours. Then he asked me to come again, and I stopped by there. But there was a shooting in Chicago, so they said that he couldn’t come because he was hiding out in Atlantic City or something. Then he came to see me when I was working in Hollywood, and the cops came and arrested him right on the set. Interviewer: So he did see 'Scarface'? Hawks: Five or six times. He had his own print of it. He thought it was great. He’d say, “Jesus Christ, you guys got a lot of stuff in that picture! How’d you know about that?” I said, “Look—you know how somebody can’t testify if he’s a lawyer? Well, I’m a lawyer.” And he laughed. He didn’t give a damn. Another famous gangster brought two very lovely daughters out to watch the movie and introduced himself to me. He said, “Where’d you get that stuff in that killing?” I asked him, “Why? Are you mad?” He said, “No, I’m just curious.” I told him, and he laughed, and he said, “That’s the way we did the shooting. Why hasn’t the picture played in Chicago?” I said, “They won’t let me.” He said, “Do you want it to play?” I said yeah. And he said, “Can I use your phone a minute?” When he finished he said, “You can play it any time you want.” ('Hawks on Hawks', Joseph McBride, 1982) P.S: On this day, 94 years ago, 'Scarface' (1932) premiered in New Orleans, Luisiana.

DepressedBergman

67,676 views • 4 months ago

🚨 ABSOLUTELY BRILLIANT! This Man Figured out how to Deal with Home Squatters • A squatter took over his mother’s house and she could not get rid of them. • This man had his mother lease the home to himself and then he moved in with the squatter until they left. • The idea is, since his mother leased it to him, he as a tenant would have a legal right to move in with the squatter. • He would then live with the squatter, put cameras up, and wait until there was an opportunity to lock them out of the home; therefore forcing the squatter to try to prove in court they have a legal right to be there, which they can’t. • It worked! After the squatter at his mothers house left, he is now using the same tactic to help others.

🚨 ABSOLUTELY BRILLIANT! This Man Figured out how to Deal with Home Squatters • A squatter took over his mother’s house and she could not get rid of them. • This man had his mother lease the home to himself and then he moved in with the squatter until they left. • The idea is, since his mother leased it to him, he as a tenant would have a legal right to move in with the squatter. • He would then live with the squatter, put cameras up, and wait until there was an opportunity to lock them out of the home; therefore forcing the squatter to try to prove in court they have a legal right to be there, which they can’t. • It worked! After the squatter at his mothers house left, he is now using the same tactic to help others.

MJTruthUltra

9,642,255 views • 2 years ago

Baier: I just got off the phone with the president…. I asked, “what you are saying is you know there is somebody on the ground in Iran that is going to rise up?” He said, “yeah, I feel there is. I feel that and some of them are no longer with us to be honest because it was 49 leaders that were taken out. That was going to take four weeks we thought to get rid of the Iranian leadership and it is always, you know, if they hide, it is a lot longer than four weeks. They would have been hiding. We were shocked when we heard what was going on. We knew exactly what was happening… they are talking about using people now that nobody ever heard of—even they don't know. They are using people, studying people to be the leader that even they don't know who they are. Can you believe that?” I said it's a tough succession plan in Iran. He said, “49 leaders is deep. It's very deep. When they met, they met for breakfast. They assumed it was good for a lot of reasons. Number one they didn't think we knew. You never attack in the morning having to do with wind and sun and a lot of things. It was amazing that we knew everything we knew.”

Baier: I just got off the phone with the president…. I asked, “what you are saying is you know there is somebody on the ground in Iran that is going to rise up?” He said, “yeah, I feel there is. I feel that and some of them are no longer with us to be honest because it was 49 leaders that were taken out. That was going to take four weeks we thought to get rid of the Iranian leadership and it is always, you know, if they hide, it is a lot longer than four weeks. They would have been hiding. We were shocked when we heard what was going on. We knew exactly what was happening… they are talking about using people now that nobody ever heard of—even they don't know. They are using people, studying people to be the leader that even they don't know who they are. Can you believe that?” I said it's a tough succession plan in Iran. He said, “49 leaders is deep. It's very deep. When they met, they met for breakfast. They assumed it was good for a lot of reasons. Number one they didn't think we knew. You never attack in the morning having to do with wind and sun and a lot of things. It was amazing that we knew everything we knew.”

Acyn

1,065,464 views • 5 months ago

Yes on the videos we have so far. The initial encounter was him filming them. There was no gun being brandished. They jumped out of vehicles to go to try to intimidate him. Unfortunately there's no video yet between then and when they had them on the ground. When they had him on the ground they were pistol whipping him, at first it looked like a baton, but it's actually a gun. They had him down with at least five officers. You got to wait for a second so he tried to stand up they shot him in the back he was motionless after they shot him in the back. Then there were four more shots or more after that unloaded into his body from a posture of standing above him. Not a defensive posture. He's supposedly has a gun. It looks like ICE took something out of a holster. So it's likely that he did have a HOLSTERED GUN in an open carry state that is not a reason to shoot someone to death. He was not brandishing it -- again it was his camera. That was the reason for the initial approach was to intimidate him about his camera. It is perfectly legal to film ice This is out not murder once again. Now there is some sort of speculation on social that a gun was dropped and a bullet went off. That would be the ICE AGENTS who took the gun out of his holster. I'll post some videos for people to see in the order that they happened.

Yes on the videos we have so far. The initial encounter was him filming them. There was no gun being brandished. They jumped out of vehicles to go to try to intimidate him. Unfortunately there's no video yet between then and when they had them on the ground. When they had him on the ground they were pistol whipping him, at first it looked like a baton, but it's actually a gun. They had him down with at least five officers. You got to wait for a second so he tried to stand up they shot him in the back he was motionless after they shot him in the back. Then there were four more shots or more after that unloaded into his body from a posture of standing above him. Not a defensive posture. He's supposedly has a gun. It looks like ICE took something out of a holster. So it's likely that he did have a HOLSTERED GUN in an open carry state that is not a reason to shoot someone to death. He was not brandishing it -- again it was his camera. That was the reason for the initial approach was to intimidate him about his camera. It is perfectly legal to film ice This is out not murder once again. Now there is some sort of speculation on social that a gun was dropped and a bullet went off. That would be the ICE AGENTS who took the gun out of his holster. I'll post some videos for people to see in the order that they happened.

Kristine (@schachin on Threads) 🇺🇦

23,566 views • 6 months ago

I went on a couple of dates with this guy in 2018, and I won’t lie, over the years, I’ve definitely thought about him. Come to find out, his “boyfriend” is his husband… he made it seem like they broke up. After a drunken FaceTime, I find out that they are MARRIED. He told me they broke up but never said that they were legally together. I found out after I stalked them on Instagram AFTER the call. Mind you, I’ve never met his husband, but his husband has me blocked on everything. Given the info, it has to be true because again, I’ve never met the guy. The husband knows that he apparently never forgot about me and that he’s contemplated leaving him to try and pursue me. I didn’t even know he got married… or that they were still together. Oh and by the way, they are still together. I was a little traumatized not gonna lie. 🫨

Sensitive content

I went on a couple of dates with this guy in 2018, and I won’t lie, over the years, I’ve definitely thought about him. Come to find out, his “boyfriend” is his husband… he made it seem like they broke up. After a drunken FaceTime, I find out that they are MARRIED. He told me they broke up but never said that they were legally together. I found out after I stalked them on Instagram AFTER the call. Mind you, I’ve never met his husband, but his husband has me blocked on everything. Given the info, it has to be true because again, I’ve never met the guy. The husband knows that he apparently never forgot about me and that he’s contemplated leaving him to try and pursue me. I didn’t even know he got married… or that they were still together. Oh and by the way, they are still together. I was a little traumatized not gonna lie. 🫨

DANIEL

49,508 views • 1 month ago

‘It’s not clear Trump even READ the Memorandum of Understanding he signed with Iran.’ —Doug Bandow, former Special Assistant to President Reagan ‘The Iranians do have to be careful not to overreach. They hold the Strait. That gives them enormous leverage, but they need to be prepared to make a deal when they can. I think what they were worried about here was that it was pretty clear Trump was violating the MOU in terms of the Strait as well as the issue of Lebanon. Now, it's not clear that he actually read the MOU before he signed it. Did he actually know what was in it? It was somewhat ambiguous. You send over a couple of real estate developers, a childhood friend and your son-in-law and expect them to work out negotiations with Iran? What could possibly go wrong? The point is that I think he realised he was in trouble, he got a lot of flak for it and thought that he could force the Iranians to back down. They are holding firm. I think the danger here is they have to be prepared at some point, I think, to make a deal. And the question then is, how do you communicate that to Trump while indicating he's got to make the real concessions… but that they're willing to let him, in a sense, get away with some of his victory claims at home, as long as they get the substantive wins in the Middle East?’ Watch the full interview in the quoted post below👇

‘It’s not clear Trump even READ the Memorandum of Understanding he signed with Iran.’ —Doug Bandow, former Special Assistant to President Reagan ‘The Iranians do have to be careful not to overreach. They hold the Strait. That gives them enormous leverage, but they need to be prepared to make a deal when they can. I think what they were worried about here was that it was pretty clear Trump was violating the MOU in terms of the Strait as well as the issue of Lebanon. Now, it's not clear that he actually read the MOU before he signed it. Did he actually know what was in it? It was somewhat ambiguous. You send over a couple of real estate developers, a childhood friend and your son-in-law and expect them to work out negotiations with Iran? What could possibly go wrong? The point is that I think he realised he was in trouble, he got a lot of flak for it and thought that he could force the Iranians to back down. They are holding firm. I think the danger here is they have to be prepared at some point, I think, to make a deal. And the question then is, how do you communicate that to Trump while indicating he's got to make the real concessions… but that they're willing to let him, in a sense, get away with some of his victory claims at home, as long as they get the substantive wins in the Middle East?’ Watch the full interview in the quoted post below👇

Going Underground

19,000 views • 25 days ago

I would like to see proof that Aidan actually received an email or a text message from the special prosecutor in Meredith’s case. She prosecutors don’t reach out to “victims” directly. It always goes through an advocate. That’s why they have an advocate. They are the ones that communicate the process with you and to you. I went through months of this with cote and testified and victim, impact and evidence and discovery, and never once have I spoken to the district attorney directly. I always spoke to the victim advocate. And they just the way he reads it, just doesn’t seem right. That’s not the way a special prosecutor speaks. I’d like Aidan to prove that he actually received that message. Because what was told to the other lawyer, is that the prosecutor actually told him that he did not need to come in. Yet he chose to anyhow. Just another lie. And the way he keeps looking up as if he’s thinking about what it should say to defend the fact that he went because he’s obsessed with his ex girlfriend WHO BROKE UP WITH HIM.

I would like to see proof that Aidan actually received an email or a text message from the special prosecutor in Meredith’s case. She prosecutors don’t reach out to “victims” directly. It always goes through an advocate. That’s why they have an advocate. They are the ones that communicate the process with you and to you. I went through months of this with cote and testified and victim, impact and evidence and discovery, and never once have I spoken to the district attorney directly. I always spoke to the victim advocate. And they just the way he reads it, just doesn’t seem right. That’s not the way a special prosecutor speaks. I’d like Aidan to prove that he actually received that message. Because what was told to the other lawyer, is that the prosecutor actually told him that he did not need to come in. Yet he chose to anyhow. Just another lie. And the way he keeps looking up as if he’s thinking about what it should say to defend the fact that he went because he’s obsessed with his ex girlfriend WHO BROKE UP WITH HIM.

Jim is the word

14,564 views • 14 days ago

Why was Trump the first presidents in Decades to not get us involved in new wars? Why is there no evidence of Trump being involved in secret societies, I.e. bohemian Grove, or skull and crossbones like previous presidents? (John Kerry and George W. were members) Why is there no evidence of Trump being on Epsteins island and involved in other CIA blackmail operations? Why have Trumps taxes been turned upside down and they have never been able to convict him of any financial crime? The answer to these, is Trump is not a part of their club. He is a true outsider. That’s why many politicians hate him, (both Republican and Democrat) but the people love him. The intelligence agencies can’t control him. They don’t have the blackmail they had on presidents of the past. Trump is not a politician. Go back and listen to Biden from the 80s and 90s and go back and listen to Trump from the same time frame. Trump sounds like the same man he is today. He has the same principles and beliefs. He doesn’t flip/flop. Biden sounds like a completely different person, because he was. He just rolls with what’s he’s told, and what keeps him in power. When it was popular in the 2000s, Biden said marriage was between a “man and a woman.” He also said he “didn’t want his kids growing up in a racial jungle,”when leading the crime bill passage through congress. He is a crooked evil man. Trump said, “I don’t want to run for president, but I would never want to rule it out, and if it got so bad I would do it. I hate seeing this country ripped off.” Trump also said, “Unfortunately there’s a certain amount of dishonesty you need for running for office, and I’m a pretty straight guy that calls it like it is. I’m not sure that gets elected. Maybe not maybe so.” If we get 4 more years of Biden, America as we know it is gone. Trump 2024

Why was Trump the first presidents in Decades to not get us involved in new wars? Why is there no evidence of Trump being involved in secret societies, I.e. bohemian Grove, or skull and crossbones like previous presidents? (John Kerry and George W. were members) Why is there no evidence of Trump being on Epsteins island and involved in other CIA blackmail operations? Why have Trumps taxes been turned upside down and they have never been able to convict him of any financial crime? The answer to these, is Trump is not a part of their club. He is a true outsider. That’s why many politicians hate him, (both Republican and Democrat) but the people love him. The intelligence agencies can’t control him. They don’t have the blackmail they had on presidents of the past. Trump is not a politician. Go back and listen to Biden from the 80s and 90s and go back and listen to Trump from the same time frame. Trump sounds like the same man he is today. He has the same principles and beliefs. He doesn’t flip/flop. Biden sounds like a completely different person, because he was. He just rolls with what’s he’s told, and what keeps him in power. When it was popular in the 2000s, Biden said marriage was between a “man and a woman.” He also said he “didn’t want his kids growing up in a racial jungle,”when leading the crime bill passage through congress. He is a crooked evil man. Trump said, “I don’t want to run for president, but I would never want to rule it out, and if it got so bad I would do it. I hate seeing this country ripped off.” Trump also said, “Unfortunately there’s a certain amount of dishonesty you need for running for office, and I’m a pretty straight guy that calls it like it is. I’m not sure that gets elected. Maybe not maybe so.” If we get 4 more years of Biden, America as we know it is gone. Trump 2024

Uncommon Sense

237,136 views • 2 years ago

The worst incest case I have ever heard,Father discovered his elder son is sleeping with his younger sister, then he started sleeping with his daughter and they fathered a child with her,all this happened in Ibadan. It breaks my heart watching this video last night, I really don’t know what’s going on in Ibadan,Her father and brother takes turn in sleeping with her, she was disvirgin by her elder brother when she was 11yrs old, her father getting aware of the incest that’s going on between his child started sleeping with her too. Father and son fully aware of what they are doing to her She said she has never known any man except her father and brother ,the father has been divorced from the mother, the useless father was blaming it on alcohol 🤦,how do you confidently sleep with your own child ? A child you slept with her mother and she was conceived right in front of you?.

Sensitive content

The worst incest case I have ever heard,Father discovered his elder son is sleeping with his younger sister, then he started sleeping with his daughter and they fathered a child with her,all this happened in Ibadan. It breaks my heart watching this video last night, I really don’t know what’s going on in Ibadan,Her father and brother takes turn in sleeping with her, she was disvirgin by her elder brother when she was 11yrs old, her father getting aware of the incest that’s going on between his child started sleeping with her too. Father and son fully aware of what they are doing to her She said she has never known any man except her father and brother ,the father has been divorced from the mother, the useless father was blaming it on alcohol 🤦,how do you confidently sleep with your own child ? A child you slept with her mother and she was conceived right in front of you?.

Brooda John

103,824 views • 4 months ago

.Daily Caller’s Reagan Reese: “On Bagram, what goes into retaking Bagram? Does that require boots on the ground?” President Donald Trump: “We’ll see what happens with Bagram. We’re talking to Afghanistan. It should have never been given up. It was the most embarrassing day in the history of our country. There was no reason to give it up. I was leaving Afghanistan. I was leaving, I was the one that got it down to 5,000 soldiers. But we were going to we were going to keep Bagram, the air base. I said it yesterday and we had an incredible trip, as you know, to U.K., and I said it during the press conference. It’s one of the most powerful runways ever built in terms of weight, length and load, what it can — what it could take, and we just gave it up for nothing. We gave it up for nothing. There was no reason to give it up. We weren’t going to leave Bagram. Joe Biden didn’t know what he was doing. We had a man that didn’t know what he was doing. We had a man, by the way, that didn’t approve — if you take a look at what’s happening in Congress — we had a man that signed everything with almost everything with an autopen and he didn’t tell the people from the autopen whoever was using it. The one man that used it predominantly said that Biden only spoke to him twice, and it was only about the weather. It was about nothing. So, those pardons that he gave are illegal. He gave illegal pardons, and that includes the congressman that destroyed and deleted all the information from J6. They deleted everything because it turned out that they were wrong. It turned out that I offered 10,000 National Guard soldiers whatever they wanted, and you wouldn’t have had a problem and they turned it down. Nancy Pelosi turned it down, and the mayor of Washington, D.C. turned it down. They deleted everything and they destroyed it, illegally destroyed it. And Biden gave them a pardon. And Biden gave a lot of other people pardons that, frankly, would be in jail if it wasn’t for those pardons. But those pardons now are illegal, according to just about everybody.”

.Daily Caller’s Reagan Reese: “On Bagram, what goes into retaking Bagram? Does that require boots on the ground?” President Donald Trump: “We’ll see what happens with Bagram. We’re talking to Afghanistan. It should have never been given up. It was the most embarrassing day in the history of our country. There was no reason to give it up. I was leaving Afghanistan. I was leaving, I was the one that got it down to 5,000 soldiers. But we were going to we were going to keep Bagram, the air base. I said it yesterday and we had an incredible trip, as you know, to U.K., and I said it during the press conference. It’s one of the most powerful runways ever built in terms of weight, length and load, what it can — what it could take, and we just gave it up for nothing. We gave it up for nothing. There was no reason to give it up. We weren’t going to leave Bagram. Joe Biden didn’t know what he was doing. We had a man that didn’t know what he was doing. We had a man, by the way, that didn’t approve — if you take a look at what’s happening in Congress — we had a man that signed everything with almost everything with an autopen and he didn’t tell the people from the autopen whoever was using it. The one man that used it predominantly said that Biden only spoke to him twice, and it was only about the weather. It was about nothing. So, those pardons that he gave are illegal. He gave illegal pardons, and that includes the congressman that destroyed and deleted all the information from J6. They deleted everything because it turned out that they were wrong. It turned out that I offered 10,000 National Guard soldiers whatever they wanted, and you wouldn’t have had a problem and they turned it down. Nancy Pelosi turned it down, and the mayor of Washington, D.C. turned it down. They deleted everything and they destroyed it, illegally destroyed it. And Biden gave them a pardon. And Biden gave a lot of other people pardons that, frankly, would be in jail if it wasn’t for those pardons. But those pardons now are illegal, according to just about everybody.”

Curtis Houck

11,963 views • 10 months ago

Joe Rogan just took time out of his podcast to express genuine concern for his friend Theo Von. He admitted that some of Von’s recent behavior after getting on SSRIs “freaks me out” — especially his comments about suicide. ROGAN: “Theo Von’s going through the exact same thing and last time he was on the podcast he was explaining it to me.” “It freaks me out because I know Theo has had conversations before...like even publicly.” “He had a Netflix taping and it didn’t go well. It was like they actually never...they shelved it. They never used it.” “And you know there was all these stories from people that were there saying he bombed. I think he just had a kind of a breakdown.” “And when he was talking to the crowd and there’s a video of it, he said, you know, the people were saying, hey, we still love you.” “He goes, thank you. Look, I’m just I’m trying not to take my own life.” “And like you hear stuff like that and you just go like, oh, Jesus Christ.” “I’ve known too many people that I didn’t think were going to kill themselves and then did.” “And then he goes down these spirals where he starts talking about world events and freaking out. I’m like, oh, Jesus Christ! Like, I got to help this dude.”

Joe Rogan just took time out of his podcast to express genuine concern for his friend Theo Von. He admitted that some of Von’s recent behavior after getting on SSRIs “freaks me out” — especially his comments about suicide. ROGAN: “Theo Von’s going through the exact same thing and last time he was on the podcast he was explaining it to me.” “It freaks me out because I know Theo has had conversations before...like even publicly.” “He had a Netflix taping and it didn’t go well. It was like they actually never...they shelved it. They never used it.” “And you know there was all these stories from people that were there saying he bombed. I think he just had a kind of a breakdown.” “And when he was talking to the crowd and there’s a video of it, he said, you know, the people were saying, hey, we still love you.” “He goes, thank you. Look, I’m just I’m trying not to take my own life.” “And like you hear stuff like that and you just go like, oh, Jesus Christ.” “I’ve known too many people that I didn’t think were going to kill themselves and then did.” “And then he goes down these spirals where he starts talking about world events and freaking out. I’m like, oh, Jesus Christ! Like, I got to help this dude.”

Overton

17,502,419 views • 3 months ago

🚨BOMBSHELL: Joe Kent's old army buddy reveals the true story. On tonight's episode of the Political Theater, Alladin, who served in Iraq with Joe Kent back in 2012 and have been close ever since, revealed that he had a phone call with Joe Kent and revealed that Kent said he did not have access to the information he claimed he had, that he was coerced into pulling this stunt, and that the interview with Tucker Carlson was scheduled A WEEK in advance. "Title 10 is internal collection authority, title title 50 is external and NCTC they don't have any of that. So the NCTC agents is basically they get fed information from FBI, other intelligence agencies and they try to make sense of the intel intelligence that they receive. And that's what was his frustration because he was asking questions and he was not getting it and that's where the confusion happened." Q: "So this means that his role actually had no access to intelligence unless it was given to him and then he was asking for specific intelligence and they were not getting giving it to him whether it existed or not, he has no ability to even know that in the first place?" A: "Correct." Q: "Who pushed him into this because I'm sure you asked him?" A: "He did not want to divulge that. I think I know where it was. I can tell you one thing. Uh the interview with Tucker Carlson, it was not scheduled like an hour after uh his resignation letter. It was actually scheduled the week prior." "He has his own frustration with everything and uh I don't think uh the Tucker Carlson because I had uh about I'm not going to lie to you guys I had about 12 minutes uh a phone call with him and and I think he has some regrets to the Tucker Carlson interview because Tucker Carlson like he veered him into like the whole Charlie Kirk and other stuff that he was not expecting anyway and he was like just basically that as the interview was going. So yeah, this to me tells me that Joe Kent made a mistake and whoever it is that veered him into this direction uh would also made a mistake. So, not wise, but you know, oh well." "By the by the way, I operated with that guy actually I was in combat with him. That's how well, I know Joe Kent. I was in combat with him in 2012." "I have no idea who put him into this and I'm still upset about it. And uh uh and thank God, he had a a 12 minute to spare me a f*cking conversation with with him. But I think we can course correct with that." I knew right from the start that this was shady. Now it seems I have been vindicated, Dan Bongino has been vindicated, Trump has been vindicated. This was a coordinated attack, most likely by Tucker Carlson and Nick Fuentes, on the administration.

🚨BOMBSHELL: Joe Kent's old army buddy reveals the true story. On tonight's episode of the Political Theater, Alladin, who served in Iraq with Joe Kent back in 2012 and have been close ever since, revealed that he had a phone call with Joe Kent and revealed that Kent said he did not have access to the information he claimed he had, that he was coerced into pulling this stunt, and that the interview with Tucker Carlson was scheduled A WEEK in advance. "Title 10 is internal collection authority, title title 50 is external and NCTC they don't have any of that. So the NCTC agents is basically they get fed information from FBI, other intelligence agencies and they try to make sense of the intel intelligence that they receive. And that's what was his frustration because he was asking questions and he was not getting it and that's where the confusion happened." Q: "So this means that his role actually had no access to intelligence unless it was given to him and then he was asking for specific intelligence and they were not getting giving it to him whether it existed or not, he has no ability to even know that in the first place?" A: "Correct." Q: "Who pushed him into this because I'm sure you asked him?" A: "He did not want to divulge that. I think I know where it was. I can tell you one thing. Uh the interview with Tucker Carlson, it was not scheduled like an hour after uh his resignation letter. It was actually scheduled the week prior." "He has his own frustration with everything and uh I don't think uh the Tucker Carlson because I had uh about I'm not going to lie to you guys I had about 12 minutes uh a phone call with him and and I think he has some regrets to the Tucker Carlson interview because Tucker Carlson like he veered him into like the whole Charlie Kirk and other stuff that he was not expecting anyway and he was like just basically that as the interview was going. So yeah, this to me tells me that Joe Kent made a mistake and whoever it is that veered him into this direction uh would also made a mistake. So, not wise, but you know, oh well." "By the by the way, I operated with that guy actually I was in combat with him. That's how well, I know Joe Kent. I was in combat with him in 2012." "I have no idea who put him into this and I'm still upset about it. And uh uh and thank God, he had a a 12 minute to spare me a f*cking conversation with with him. But I think we can course correct with that." I knew right from the start that this was shady. Now it seems I have been vindicated, Dan Bongino has been vindicated, Trump has been vindicated. This was a coordinated attack, most likely by Tucker Carlson and Nick Fuentes, on the administration.

Jacktron

34,932 views • 4 months ago

What does Trump actually think about Xi Jinping and the CCP? This is what Trump told Lee Smith: “I think you have some very powerful forces in China. President Xi is a very smart and powerful man, but you have other forces that are strong.” “I saw it firsthand. He viewed my relationship with him and my position as president as very important. They were very embarrassed when they said this to us, because this was like having a deal ready to be signed and the deal was virtually ready to be signed. And then they withdrew it. And I believe that they had some additional forces in China that did not want to. I have no doubt in my mind. But that deal didn’t happen.”

What does Trump actually think about Xi Jinping and the CCP? This is what Trump told Lee Smith: “I think you have some very powerful forces in China. President Xi is a very smart and powerful man, but you have other forces that are strong.” “I saw it firsthand. He viewed my relationship with him and my position as president as very important. They were very embarrassed when they said this to us, because this was like having a deal ready to be signed and the deal was virtually ready to be signed. And then they withdrew it. And I believe that they had some additional forces in China that did not want to. I have no doubt in my mind. But that deal didn’t happen.”

Jan Jekielek

40,179 views • 10 months ago