Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

“Hate speech laws would have stopped the Nazis.” There’s just one problem. They already tried.

12,325 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

10 Kommentare

Profilbild von Greg Lukianoff
Greg Lukianoffvor 2 Monaten

On @freespeechtalk, Nadine Strossen, @NicoPerrino, & I explain why Weimar Germany’s experience should make us skeptical of giving governments more power to police speech.

Profilbild von nero
nerovor 2 Monaten

As I've said - Lukianoff's Law: laws meant to protect vulnerable groups from speech they don't like will eventually be used to supress the very people it was meant to protect.

Profilbild von Greg Lukianoff
Greg Lukianoffvor 2 Monaten

And sometimes “eventually“ means practically the next day!

Profilbild von Bobby Gould
Bobby Gouldvor 2 Monaten

There’s more than one problem.

Profilbild von Greg Lukianoff
Greg Lukianoffvor 2 Monaten

Well yes, :-)

Profilbild von Trevor Ewen
Trevor Ewenvor 2 Monaten

One of the worst memory holes in our modern discourse is the idea that fascist Germany was some kind of free speech Mecca. Central planning and top down authority is a big part of the fascist brand... speech is included.

Profilbild von Deymond
Deymondvor 2 Monaten

You say foolish argument, I say malicious.

Profilbild von Deepdownsouth
Deepdownsouthvor 2 Monaten

No not really

Profilbild von Andrew Rabbitt
Andrew Rabbittvor 2 Monaten

Do people really want their local protection racketeers to also police what they have to say...?

Profilbild von Bryan W. Lepore | anti alchemy
Bryan W. Lepore | anti alchemyvor 2 Monaten

Intriguing. Speech precedes law. Speech is an endowed right - "unalienable", one might say.

Ähnliche Videos