正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

👀Have you seen the study? "The only real problem with this study, and why it didn't get submitted for publication, is that its findings did not fit the belief that vaccines are safe--- a real-world example of how the science around vaccines gets corrupted." -Aaron Siri Esq., in Senate...

88,165 次观看 • 9 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

A MUST WATCH! Aaron Siri just revealed that a vaccinated vs. unvaccinated study from Henry Ford Medical Center was buried because it showed unvaccinated children were healthier. “Del Bigtree and I met with Dr. Marcus Zervos, head of infectious disease at Henry Ford Medical Center.” “He was pro-vaccine, running clinical trials.” “We argued this was the chance to shut the anti-vaxxers up about their claim that unvaccinated children are healthier.” “To our surprise, he agreed to conduct the study.” “Dr. Zervos recruited a chief epidemiologist and two statisticians. These were mainstream scientists with orthodox views about vaccines.” “The study compared children enrolled at Henry Ford from 2000 to 2016 from birth onward — unvaccinated children versus those who received one or more vaccines.” “It was based on actual medical records.” “Vaccinated children had 4.29x the rate of asthma, 3.03x the rate of atopic disease, 5.96x the rate of autoimmune disease, 5.53x the rate of neurodevelopmental disorders, including 3.28x developmental delay and 4.47x speech disorder.” “ADHD: 262 cases in the vaccinated group. Zero in the unvaccinated group.” “All of these findings were statistically significant.” “After 10 years, 57% of vaccinated children had a chronic health issue — often multiple, only 17% of unvaccinated children did.” “Had it found vaccinated kids were healthier, it would have been published immediately. Because it found the opposite, it was shoved in a drawer.” “The findings didn’t fit the policy that vaccines are safe.” “We urged the researchers to submit it. They admitted the study was well-designed and conducted. But Dr. Zervos said he didn’t want to lose his job. Another said she didn’t want to make doctors uncomfortable.” “This is a real-world example of how the science around vaccines gets corrupted — how only studies that confirm the belief that vaccines are safe get published. Everything else gets shoved in a drawer.”

End Tribalism in Politics

1,534,114 次观看 • 9 个月前

One of the world’s most respected vaccine experts—Dr. Kathryn Edwards, co-author of the bible of vaccinology “Plotkin on Vaccines” and the scientist who personally ran many of the pivotal trials that got childhood vaccines licensed—was hired to testify under oath that vaccines do NOT cause autism. Aaron Siri asked her a simple question for each vaccine on the schedule: “Can you show me the study proving DTaP doesn’t cause autism?” → No study “Hep B?” → No study “HiB?” → No study “Prevnar?” → No study “Varicella?” → No study “Were the original licensing trials even designed to detect autism as a possible outcome?” → No Her exact words when pressed: “You’ve badgered me into answering the way you want me to, but… No.” This is the same expert the entire “vaccines are exhaustively studied for autism” narrative rests on. She had one job in that deposition—and she couldn’t do it. Not one citation. Zero studies. Del Bigtree on The HighWire called it “one of the biggest mic-drop moments in vaccine history.” And now, just weeks after ICAN forced the CDC to admit in writing (as of November 2025) they have no studies showing vaccines are safe in pregnancy or don’t cause autism, this older testimony feels more seismic than ever. Watch the unedited exchange for yourself and decide. What does real scientific confidence look like to you? Drop your thoughts—respectful discussion only.

Camus

70,348 次观看 • 6 个月前