Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

👀Have you seen the study? "The only real problem with this study, and why it didn't get submitted for publication, is that its findings did not fit the belief that vaccines are safe--- a real-world example of how the science around vaccines gets corrupted." -Aaron Siri Esq., in Senate... show more

The HighWire

236,779 subscribers

88,165 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Здоровье и велнес Наука и технологии Новости и политика

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Aaron Siri, Esq., destroys the claim "vaccines have saved 154 million lives." Siri points out the study doesn't have a reliability range. "It could be equally true that 200 million lives were LOST because of the vaccine program.'' "This is the embodiment of the corruption of science."

Aaron Siri, Esq., destroys the claim "vaccines have saved 154 million lives." Siri points out the study doesn't have a reliability range. "It could be equally true that 200 million lives were LOST because of the vaccine program.'' "This is the embodiment of the corruption of science."

The HighWire

371,041 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

A MUST WATCH! Aaron Siri just revealed that a vaccinated vs. unvaccinated study from Henry Ford Medical Center was buried because it showed unvaccinated children were healthier. “Del Bigtree and I met with Dr. Marcus Zervos, head of infectious disease at Henry Ford Medical Center.” “He was pro-vaccine, running clinical trials.” “We argued this was the chance to shut the anti-vaxxers up about their claim that unvaccinated children are healthier.” “To our surprise, he agreed to conduct the study.” “Dr. Zervos recruited a chief epidemiologist and two statisticians. These were mainstream scientists with orthodox views about vaccines.” “The study compared children enrolled at Henry Ford from 2000 to 2016 from birth onward — unvaccinated children versus those who received one or more vaccines.” “It was based on actual medical records.” “Vaccinated children had 4.29x the rate of asthma, 3.03x the rate of atopic disease, 5.96x the rate of autoimmune disease, 5.53x the rate of neurodevelopmental disorders, including 3.28x developmental delay and 4.47x speech disorder.” “ADHD: 262 cases in the vaccinated group. Zero in the unvaccinated group.” “All of these findings were statistically significant.” “After 10 years, 57% of vaccinated children had a chronic health issue — often multiple, only 17% of unvaccinated children did.” “Had it found vaccinated kids were healthier, it would have been published immediately. Because it found the opposite, it was shoved in a drawer.” “The findings didn’t fit the policy that vaccines are safe.” “We urged the researchers to submit it. They admitted the study was well-designed and conducted. But Dr. Zervos said he didn’t want to lose his job. Another said she didn’t want to make doctors uncomfortable.” “This is a real-world example of how the science around vaccines gets corrupted — how only studies that confirm the belief that vaccines are safe get published. Everything else gets shoved in a drawer.”

A MUST WATCH! Aaron Siri just revealed that a vaccinated vs. unvaccinated study from Henry Ford Medical Center was buried because it showed unvaccinated children were healthier. “Del Bigtree and I met with Dr. Marcus Zervos, head of infectious disease at Henry Ford Medical Center.” “He was pro-vaccine, running clinical trials.” “We argued this was the chance to shut the anti-vaxxers up about their claim that unvaccinated children are healthier.” “To our surprise, he agreed to conduct the study.” “Dr. Zervos recruited a chief epidemiologist and two statisticians. These were mainstream scientists with orthodox views about vaccines.” “The study compared children enrolled at Henry Ford from 2000 to 2016 from birth onward — unvaccinated children versus those who received one or more vaccines.” “It was based on actual medical records.” “Vaccinated children had 4.29x the rate of asthma, 3.03x the rate of atopic disease, 5.96x the rate of autoimmune disease, 5.53x the rate of neurodevelopmental disorders, including 3.28x developmental delay and 4.47x speech disorder.” “ADHD: 262 cases in the vaccinated group. Zero in the unvaccinated group.” “All of these findings were statistically significant.” “After 10 years, 57% of vaccinated children had a chronic health issue — often multiple, only 17% of unvaccinated children did.” “Had it found vaccinated kids were healthier, it would have been published immediately. Because it found the opposite, it was shoved in a drawer.” “The findings didn’t fit the policy that vaccines are safe.” “We urged the researchers to submit it. They admitted the study was well-designed and conducted. But Dr. Zervos said he didn’t want to lose his job. Another said she didn’t want to make doctors uncomfortable.” “This is a real-world example of how the science around vaccines gets corrupted — how only studies that confirm the belief that vaccines are safe get published. Everything else gets shoved in a drawer.”

End Tribalism in Politics

1,534,628 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Having spent the last decade studying the causes of autism, Dr Toby Rogers was mortified to discover approval for the use of aluminum in vaccines was based on a study of only 4 white rabbits. Not only did they lose the results of one rabbit but the aluminum adjuvant was found in the kidneys, liver, heart, lymph nodes, bone marrow and brain. Yet still the FDA/CDC declared it safe and effective. ‘It’s beyond kafkaesque in its absurdity because the science is so terribly bad that anybody who reads that study would not want to inject their children with aluminum adjuvanted vaccines. And that’s just one ingredient amongst 100s in these vaccines.’ Toby Rogers The DarkHorse Podcast

Having spent the last decade studying the causes of autism, Dr Toby Rogers was mortified to discover approval for the use of aluminum in vaccines was based on a study of only 4 white rabbits. Not only did they lose the results of one rabbit but the aluminum adjuvant was found in the kidneys, liver, heart, lymph nodes, bone marrow and brain. Yet still the FDA/CDC declared it safe and effective. ‘It’s beyond kafkaesque in its absurdity because the science is so terribly bad that anybody who reads that study would not want to inject their children with aluminum adjuvanted vaccines. And that’s just one ingredient amongst 100s in these vaccines.’ Toby Rogers The DarkHorse Podcast

Kat A 🌸

111,374 просмотров • 1 год назад

Having spent the last decade studying the causes of autism, Dr Tobey Rogers was mortified to discover FDA/CDC approval for the use of aluminum in vaccines was based on a study of 4 rabbits. The results were a disaster. With aluminum found in the brain, kidneys, liver, heart, lymph nodes and bone marrow. ‘It’s beyond kafkaesque in its absurdity because the science is so terribly bad that anybody who reads that study would not want to inject their children with aluminum adjuvanted vaccines. And that’s just one ingredient amongst hundreds in these vaccines.’ Trump is right to have it removed.

Having spent the last decade studying the causes of autism, Dr Tobey Rogers was mortified to discover FDA/CDC approval for the use of aluminum in vaccines was based on a study of 4 rabbits. The results were a disaster. With aluminum found in the brain, kidneys, liver, heart, lymph nodes and bone marrow. ‘It’s beyond kafkaesque in its absurdity because the science is so terribly bad that anybody who reads that study would not want to inject their children with aluminum adjuvanted vaccines. And that’s just one ingredient amongst hundreds in these vaccines.’ Trump is right to have it removed.

Kat A 🌸

381,222 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

In An Inconvenient Study I went to someone who thought I was wrong. Someone who believed vaccines were safe and had the data to back it up. I told him to use it. Design the study yourself, run it your way, and whatever you find I will accept. That is how science is supposed to work. We are hoping Robert Kennedy Jr. can run a larger version of that study using the American database. This fight is not only about children. COVID was the attempt to bring adults into the same system, to begin normalizing a lifetime schedule of 72 vaccines for every person. They were always coming for you.

In An Inconvenient Study I went to someone who thought I was wrong. Someone who believed vaccines were safe and had the data to back it up. I told him to use it. Design the study yourself, run it your way, and whatever you find I will accept. That is how science is supposed to work. We are hoping Robert Kennedy Jr. can run a larger version of that study using the American database. This fight is not only about children. COVID was the attempt to bring adults into the same system, to begin normalizing a lifetime schedule of 72 vaccines for every person. They were always coming for you.

Del Bigtree

22,315 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Sen. Ron Johnson says the quiet part out loud: “You pay for science, you get the result you want.” “Science has been corrupted … for decades.” “Eisenhower warned us about that.” “When you have the government pay for science, for research, you're going to have a scientific and technological elite spring from that.” “You pay for science, you get the result you want.” “Whether it's climate change, whether it's vaccines … whether it's food products.” “I want everybody at the table … I want everybody arguing over the science because that's what science is.” “You have to have that debate, but we have not been allowed to have that debate.” Senator Ron Johnson

Sen. Ron Johnson says the quiet part out loud: “You pay for science, you get the result you want.” “Science has been corrupted … for decades.” “Eisenhower warned us about that.” “When you have the government pay for science, for research, you're going to have a scientific and technological elite spring from that.” “You pay for science, you get the result you want.” “Whether it's climate change, whether it's vaccines … whether it's food products.” “I want everybody at the table … I want everybody arguing over the science because that's what science is.” “You have to have that debate, but we have not been allowed to have that debate.” Senator Ron Johnson

Children’s Health Defense

30,602 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

RFK Jr. breaks down to Bernie Sanders how vaccines are not the only thing that brought infant mortality down in the U.S. “The study you cited is a modeling study.” “CDC has actually done a real study… it says that almost none of it was attributable to vaccination.” “It was attributable to hygiene, sewer plants, better water supplies, and engineering.” “That’s not my view, that’s the CDC’s view.”

RFK Jr. breaks down to Bernie Sanders how vaccines are not the only thing that brought infant mortality down in the U.S. “The study you cited is a modeling study.” “CDC has actually done a real study… it says that almost none of it was attributable to vaccination.” “It was attributable to hygiene, sewer plants, better water supplies, and engineering.” “That’s not my view, that’s the CDC’s view.”

MAHA Action

99,729 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

CDC Couldn't provide a single study to support their claim 'Vaccines do NOT cause autism' for the vaccines a child gets in their first six months of life. See the full video with Aaron Siri and Del Bigtree, here:

CDC Couldn't provide a single study to support their claim 'Vaccines do NOT cause autism' for the vaccines a child gets in their first six months of life. See the full video with Aaron Siri and Del Bigtree, here:

The HighWire

276,348 просмотров • 2 лет назад

🌍 When a story crosses oceans, you know it matters. Just over a week after "An Inconvenient Study" premiered, a Senate hearing in Australia discussed the unpublished Henry Ford study, which ICAN challenged them to conduct years ago. Lawmakers overseas are now openly asking questions about this unpublished study and why it wasn’t submitted for publication. As one senator put it, “Of course it’s unpublished. Who’s going to publish it?” This conversation is no longer confined to one country, one community, or one media ecosystem. When elected officials on the other side of the world say the silence around this topic is the problem, the narrative is shifting.

🌍 When a story crosses oceans, you know it matters. Just over a week after "An Inconvenient Study" premiered, a Senate hearing in Australia discussed the unpublished Henry Ford study, which ICAN challenged them to conduct years ago. Lawmakers overseas are now openly asking questions about this unpublished study and why it wasn’t submitted for publication. As one senator put it, “Of course it’s unpublished. Who’s going to publish it?” This conversation is no longer confined to one country, one community, or one media ecosystem. When elected officials on the other side of the world say the silence around this topic is the problem, the narrative is shifting.

The HighWire

19,619 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Paper ‘disproving’ link between vaccines and autism is JUNK SCIENCE. During Robert F. Kennedy Jr’s confirmation hearing, U.S. Senator Bill Cassidy, M.D. cited a flawed study claiming it was evidence that vaccines don’t cause autism. On “Good Morning CHD,” Brian Hooker, PhD took the opportunity to respond and refute the paper as “propaganda masquerading as science.”

Paper ‘disproving’ link between vaccines and autism is JUNK SCIENCE. During Robert F. Kennedy Jr’s confirmation hearing, U.S. Senator Bill Cassidy, M.D. cited a flawed study claiming it was evidence that vaccines don’t cause autism. On “Good Morning CHD,” Brian Hooker, PhD took the opportunity to respond and refute the paper as “propaganda masquerading as science.”

Children’s Health Defense

37,271 просмотров • 1 год назад

BREAKING: Senator Ron Johnson reveals a high-quality Vax vs. Unvax study will FINALLY be made public Tuesday. Originally conducted in 2000, the results have been buried for 25 years—until now. And what did the data suggest? “…the vaccinated population [is] far more prone to chronic illness than people completely unexposed to vaccines.” Attorney Aaron Siri will unveil the full findings on Tuesday. This could be HUGE.

BREAKING: Senator Ron Johnson reveals a high-quality Vax vs. Unvax study will FINALLY be made public Tuesday. Originally conducted in 2000, the results have been buried for 25 years—until now. And what did the data suggest? “…the vaccinated population [is] far more prone to chronic illness than people completely unexposed to vaccines.” Attorney Aaron Siri will unveil the full findings on Tuesday. This could be HUGE.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

526,633 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Senate hearing bombshell: Dr. Peter McCullough, a prominent cardiologist, exposes a peer-reviewed autopsy study in Forensic Science International titled "A systematic review of autopsy findings in deaths after COVID-19 vaccination." The study, led by Nicolas Hulscher, found 73.9% of examined deaths were likely caused or significantly linked to COVID-19 vaccines.

Senate hearing bombshell: Dr. Peter McCullough, a prominent cardiologist, exposes a peer-reviewed autopsy study in Forensic Science International titled "A systematic review of autopsy findings in deaths after COVID-19 vaccination." The study, led by Nicolas Hulscher, found 73.9% of examined deaths were likely caused or significantly linked to COVID-19 vaccines.

Not A Number

97,097 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Sen. Ron Johnson Exposes the “3.2 Million Lives Saved by Vaccines” Myth — The Math Doesn’t Add Up In a fiery Senate exchange, Sen. Ron Johnson dismantled the claim that COVID vaccines “saved” 3.2 million American lives — calling it propaganda, not science. He revealed the so‑called Commonwealth Fund “study” wasn’t peer‑reviewed. It was a blog post built on questionable modeling — not real data. Then he pulled CDC’s own numbers: - 2019: 2.85 million deaths - 2020: 3.38 million (no vaccines) - 2021: 3.46 million (mass vaccination) Johnson asked the question no one in public health dares ask — if vaccines saved millions, why did deaths keep climbing? To make that claim true, U.S. deaths would’ve had to surge past 5 million per year. They didn’t. He accused the NIH of blocking early treatments, pushing remdesivir and ventilators, and rewriting science to fit a political script. His message hit hard: The numbers don’t lie — but the narrative might.

Sen. Ron Johnson Exposes the “3.2 Million Lives Saved by Vaccines” Myth — The Math Doesn’t Add Up In a fiery Senate exchange, Sen. Ron Johnson dismantled the claim that COVID vaccines “saved” 3.2 million American lives — calling it propaganda, not science. He revealed the so‑called Commonwealth Fund “study” wasn’t peer‑reviewed. It was a blog post built on questionable modeling — not real data. Then he pulled CDC’s own numbers: - 2019: 2.85 million deaths - 2020: 3.38 million (no vaccines) - 2021: 3.46 million (mass vaccination) Johnson asked the question no one in public health dares ask — if vaccines saved millions, why did deaths keep climbing? To make that claim true, U.S. deaths would’ve had to surge past 5 million per year. They didn’t. He accused the NIH of blocking early treatments, pushing remdesivir and ventilators, and rewriting science to fit a political script. His message hit hard: The numbers don’t lie — but the narrative might.

Camus

34,141 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Enjoyed chatting with Sara Gonzales about the new documentary “An Inconvenient Study.” Del Bigtree This documentary highlights a Henry Ford study on vaccines and chronic illness in kids that never was submitted for peer review. You can guess why…

Enjoyed chatting with Sara Gonzales about the new documentary “An Inconvenient Study.” Del Bigtree This documentary highlights a Henry Ford study on vaccines and chronic illness in kids that never was submitted for peer review. You can guess why…

Joseph A. Ladapo, MD, PhD

45,766 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

🚨 SEN. RON JOHNSON: “THE MATH DOESN’T ADD UP.” 🚨 In a fiery Senate exchange, Sen. Ron Johnson just torched the claim that COVID vaccines “saved 3.2 million American lives.” “That’s propaganda — not science.” He exposed the so-called Commonwealth Fund study as a blog post — not peer-reviewed science, not based on real data. Then came the receipts: CDC Data 2019: 2.85M deaths 2020: 3.38M deaths (no vaccines) 2021: 3.46M deaths (mass vaccination) If vaccines “saved” 3.2 million lives, total deaths should’ve topped 5 million. They didn’t. Johnson didn’t stop there: he accused the NIH of blocking early treatments, pushing failed protocols, and rewriting science to fit politics. “They told people to go home and pray they didn’t need a ventilator.” The numbers don’t lie. But the narrative might.

🚨 SEN. RON JOHNSON: “THE MATH DOESN’T ADD UP.” 🚨 In a fiery Senate exchange, Sen. Ron Johnson just torched the claim that COVID vaccines “saved 3.2 million American lives.” “That’s propaganda — not science.” He exposed the so-called Commonwealth Fund study as a blog post — not peer-reviewed science, not based on real data. Then came the receipts: CDC Data 2019: 2.85M deaths 2020: 3.38M deaths (no vaccines) 2021: 3.46M deaths (mass vaccination) If vaccines “saved” 3.2 million lives, total deaths should’ve topped 5 million. They didn’t. Johnson didn’t stop there: he accused the NIH of blocking early treatments, pushing failed protocols, and rewriting science to fit politics. “They told people to go home and pray they didn’t need a ventilator.” The numbers don’t lie. But the narrative might.

Jim Ferguson

47,853 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

A landmark, long-suppressed study from a prestigious pro-vaccine institution is set to be unveiled at a U.S. Senate hearing next Tuesday. The research, which compares health outcomes in vaccinated versus completely unvaccinated individuals, reportedly reveals that the vaccinated population is significantly more prone to chronic illness. Senator Ron Johnson will hold the hearing, where attorney Aaron Siri will testify and formally enter the study into the congressional record. According to Del Bigtree of The HighWire, the study was conducted by a high-integrity healthcare facility that initially undertook the research to disprove claims of vaccine-related harm. However, upon discovering damning results in 2020 that allegedly implicated vaccines in the chronic disease epidemic, the institution chose to bury the findings. The revelation of this study is being hailed as a potential game-changer for the medical freedom movement. To coincide with the hearing, the trailer for a new documentary detailing the study's suppression, titled "An Inconvenient Study," will premiere. The full film is scheduled for release on October 3rd. This development represents the first time a major, ostensibly impartial medical institution has conducted such a comparative analysis, with results that could fundamentally challenge the established narrative on vaccine safety.

A landmark, long-suppressed study from a prestigious pro-vaccine institution is set to be unveiled at a U.S. Senate hearing next Tuesday. The research, which compares health outcomes in vaccinated versus completely unvaccinated individuals, reportedly reveals that the vaccinated population is significantly more prone to chronic illness. Senator Ron Johnson will hold the hearing, where attorney Aaron Siri will testify and formally enter the study into the congressional record. According to Del Bigtree of The HighWire, the study was conducted by a high-integrity healthcare facility that initially undertook the research to disprove claims of vaccine-related harm. However, upon discovering damning results in 2020 that allegedly implicated vaccines in the chronic disease epidemic, the institution chose to bury the findings. The revelation of this study is being hailed as a potential game-changer for the medical freedom movement. To coincide with the hearing, the trailer for a new documentary detailing the study's suppression, titled "An Inconvenient Study," will premiere. The full film is scheduled for release on October 3rd. This development represents the first time a major, ostensibly impartial medical institution has conducted such a comparative analysis, with results that could fundamentally challenge the established narrative on vaccine safety.

Camus

46,117 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

Hegseth says he’s ordering a “real science” study on women in combat arms. But this isn’t about discovery—it’s about doubt. Women in combat have already proven themselves. The real question is whether this regime will follow the facts or cherry-pick findings to fit its agenda.

Hegseth says he’s ordering a “real science” study on women in combat arms. But this isn’t about discovery—it’s about doubt. Women in combat have already proven themselves. The real question is whether this regime will follow the facts or cherry-pick findings to fit its agenda.

Senator Mazie Hirono

10,236 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

"To say that vaccines do not cause autism is not a scientific statement. It is a belief." — Aaron Siri A stunning legal revelation exposes fundamental flaws in vaccine safety claims. Attorney Aaron Siri details how the CDC, when sued, failed to produce studies proving the safety of vaccines given in the first 6 months of life. Through a FOIA lawsuit, Siri's organization ICAN demanded studies showing Hep B, DTaP, and other early childhood vaccines don't cause autism. The CDC's response was telling: ❌ Provided ZERO dedicated studies on the 15 shots given before 6 months ❌ Offered 20 studies, but 19 were irrelevant (MMR or other ingredients) ❌ The one relevant review found a study linking DTaP to autism, which was dismissed Siri also dismantles the famous Danish MMR study, revealing critical flaws: • MMR is given after one year, but autism can be diagnosed before one year • The study only compares children who already received all their 2, 4, and 6-month vaccines • It ignores "healthy user bias" - children injured by earlier vaccines often don't receive MMR The conclusion is inescapable: The foundational safety science for the vaccination schedule given to infants is missing. The public has been told "the science is settled" while the most basic studies on the actual vaccine schedule have never been conducted. When the burden of proof falls on regulators, the evidence collapses.

"To say that vaccines do not cause autism is not a scientific statement. It is a belief." — Aaron Siri A stunning legal revelation exposes fundamental flaws in vaccine safety claims. Attorney Aaron Siri details how the CDC, when sued, failed to produce studies proving the safety of vaccines given in the first 6 months of life. Through a FOIA lawsuit, Siri's organization ICAN demanded studies showing Hep B, DTaP, and other early childhood vaccines don't cause autism. The CDC's response was telling: ❌ Provided ZERO dedicated studies on the 15 shots given before 6 months ❌ Offered 20 studies, but 19 were irrelevant (MMR or other ingredients) ❌ The one relevant review found a study linking DTaP to autism, which was dismissed Siri also dismantles the famous Danish MMR study, revealing critical flaws: • MMR is given after one year, but autism can be diagnosed before one year • The study only compares children who already received all their 2, 4, and 6-month vaccines • It ignores "healthy user bias" - children injured by earlier vaccines often don't receive MMR The conclusion is inescapable: The foundational safety science for the vaccination schedule given to infants is missing. The public has been told "the science is settled" while the most basic studies on the actual vaccine schedule have never been conducted. When the burden of proof falls on regulators, the evidence collapses.

Camus

23,976 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

One of the world’s most respected vaccine experts—Dr. Kathryn Edwards, co-author of the bible of vaccinology “Plotkin on Vaccines” and the scientist who personally ran many of the pivotal trials that got childhood vaccines licensed—was hired to testify under oath that vaccines do NOT cause autism. Aaron Siri asked her a simple question for each vaccine on the schedule: “Can you show me the study proving DTaP doesn’t cause autism?” → No study “Hep B?” → No study “HiB?” → No study “Prevnar?” → No study “Varicella?” → No study “Were the original licensing trials even designed to detect autism as a possible outcome?” → No Her exact words when pressed: “You’ve badgered me into answering the way you want me to, but… No.” This is the same expert the entire “vaccines are exhaustively studied for autism” narrative rests on. She had one job in that deposition—and she couldn’t do it. Not one citation. Zero studies. Del Bigtree on The HighWire called it “one of the biggest mic-drop moments in vaccine history.” And now, just weeks after ICAN forced the CDC to admit in writing (as of November 2025) they have no studies showing vaccines are safe in pregnancy or don’t cause autism, this older testimony feels more seismic than ever. Watch the unedited exchange for yourself and decide. What does real scientific confidence look like to you? Drop your thoughts—respectful discussion only.

One of the world’s most respected vaccine experts—Dr. Kathryn Edwards, co-author of the bible of vaccinology “Plotkin on Vaccines” and the scientist who personally ran many of the pivotal trials that got childhood vaccines licensed—was hired to testify under oath that vaccines do NOT cause autism. Aaron Siri asked her a simple question for each vaccine on the schedule: “Can you show me the study proving DTaP doesn’t cause autism?” → No study “Hep B?” → No study “HiB?” → No study “Prevnar?” → No study “Varicella?” → No study “Were the original licensing trials even designed to detect autism as a possible outcome?” → No Her exact words when pressed: “You’ve badgered me into answering the way you want me to, but… No.” This is the same expert the entire “vaccines are exhaustively studied for autism” narrative rests on. She had one job in that deposition—and she couldn’t do it. Not one citation. Zero studies. Del Bigtree on The HighWire called it “one of the biggest mic-drop moments in vaccine history.” And now, just weeks after ICAN forced the CDC to admit in writing (as of November 2025) they have no studies showing vaccines are safe in pregnancy or don’t cause autism, this older testimony feels more seismic than ever. Watch the unedited exchange for yourself and decide. What does real scientific confidence look like to you? Drop your thoughts—respectful discussion only.

Camus

70,348 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад