Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

HE BUILT A $35,000-TIER ANIMATED WEBSITE WITH CLAUDE CODE + HIGGSFIELD - FOR A SUBSCRIPTION AND A FEW DOLLARS OF CREDITS What’s on screen isn’t a basic landing page. It’s a fully animated, scroll-driven site generated end to end in one agentic session. What’s actually on the page: →...

zeuuss_01's profile picture

ZEUS⚡️

31,067 subscribers

103,944 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

A SOLO CREATOR JUST SHIPPED A $35,000-TIER ANIMATED SITE IN ONE WEEKEND - WITH CLAUDE CODE + HIGGSFIELD, FOR THE COST OF A SUBSCRIPTION. What you're looking at isn't a template. It's a fully animated, scroll-driven site, generated end to end in a single agentic session. What's actually on the page: → Cinematic motion clips pulled from 30+ generative models → Scroll animations written automatically - not a single hand-coded keyframe → 6 cinematic effects baked in with zero config: film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints, scroll pacing Scroll the demo and one question keeps surfacing: a person didn't build this by hand… did they? For studios billing $100-149/hr, that question lands like a verdict. What this normally takes: → A designer, a motion artist, and a developer → Weeks of handoffs between all three → 6 systems wired by hand - GSAP ScrollTrigger, Lenis smooth-scroll, frame extraction, asset optimization, layout, copy That pipeline was the moat. It's what justified the invoice. Here's the part the agency won't put in its pitch deck. The price gap: → Boutique agency build: $6,000-$35,000+ → Industry average project: ~$5,280 → Your cost: a Claude subscription + a few dollars of Higgsfield credits → Timeline: weeks of production → one session One operator now runs all six systems in a single pass and ships a working site - without opening a frame extractor or writing one CSS keyframe. Full breakdown of how it's built in the article below. Save it & read today 👇
0:19

A SOLO CREATOR JUST SHIPPED A $35,000-TIER ANIMATED SITE IN ONE WEEKEND - WITH CLAUDE CODE + HIGGSFIELD, FOR THE COST OF A SUBSCRIPTION. What you're looking at isn't a template. It's a fully animated, scroll-driven site, generated end to end in a single agentic session. What's actually on the page: → Cinematic motion clips pulled from 30+ generative models → Scroll animations written automatically - not a single hand-coded keyframe → 6 cinematic effects baked in with zero config: film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints, scroll pacing Scroll the demo and one question keeps surfacing: a person didn't build this by hand… did they? For studios billing $100-149/hr, that question lands like a verdict. What this normally takes: → A designer, a motion artist, and a developer → Weeks of handoffs between all three → 6 systems wired by hand - GSAP ScrollTrigger, Lenis smooth-scroll, frame extraction, asset optimization, layout, copy That pipeline was the moat. It's what justified the invoice. Here's the part the agency won't put in its pitch deck. The price gap: → Boutique agency build: $6,000-$35,000+ → Industry average project: ~$5,280 → Your cost: a Claude subscription + a few dollars of Higgsfield credits → Timeline: weeks of production → one session One operator now runs all six systems in a single pass and ships a working site - without opening a frame extractor or writing one CSS keyframe. Full breakdown of how it's built in the article below. Save it & read today 👇

ZEUS⚡️

21,598 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

STUDIOS QUOTE $35,000 FOR THIS WEBSITE. A FULLY ANIMATED, SCROLL-DRIVEN BUILD - CINEMATIC CLIPS, FILM GRAIN, GLASS CARDS - SHIPPED IN ONE SESSION FOR $12. Scroll it and one question won't leave: did an AI really assemble all of this in a single pass? For studios quoting $35,000 and billing $100-149/hr, that question lands like a verdict. Here's what the page actually runs: → Motion clips generated from 30+ models - not stock, not hand-shot → Scroll animations written automatically - zero hand-coded keyframes → Six cinematic effects baked in with no config: film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints, scroll pacing What that used to require: → A designer, a motion artist, and a developer → Weeks of handoffs → Six systems wired by hand - GSAP ScrollTrigger, Lenis, frame extraction, asset optimization, layout, copy That pipeline was the moat. It justified the invoice. It just collapsed into Claude Code + Higgsfield running in one pass. The gap nobody wants to say out loud: → Agency build: $6,000-$35,000+ → Real cost now: a Claude sub + a few dollars of credits → Timeline: weeks → a single session Follow me + reply "web-site" to this post and I will send you the step-by-step Playbook 👇
0:16

STUDIOS QUOTE $35,000 FOR THIS WEBSITE. A FULLY ANIMATED, SCROLL-DRIVEN BUILD - CINEMATIC CLIPS, FILM GRAIN, GLASS CARDS - SHIPPED IN ONE SESSION FOR $12. Scroll it and one question won't leave: did an AI really assemble all of this in a single pass? For studios quoting $35,000 and billing $100-149/hr, that question lands like a verdict. Here's what the page actually runs: → Motion clips generated from 30+ models - not stock, not hand-shot → Scroll animations written automatically - zero hand-coded keyframes → Six cinematic effects baked in with no config: film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints, scroll pacing What that used to require: → A designer, a motion artist, and a developer → Weeks of handoffs → Six systems wired by hand - GSAP ScrollTrigger, Lenis, frame extraction, asset optimization, layout, copy That pipeline was the moat. It justified the invoice. It just collapsed into Claude Code + Higgsfield running in one pass. The gap nobody wants to say out loud: → Agency build: $6,000-$35,000+ → Real cost now: a Claude sub + a few dollars of credits → Timeline: weeks → a single session Follow me + reply "web-site" to this post and I will send you the step-by-step Playbook 👇

ZEUS⚡️

56,961 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

FABLE 5 + HIGGSFIELD CAN BUILD A $35,000 ANIMATED WEBSITE. IN ONE AGENTIC SESSION. FOR ~$12 IN CREDITS. stop paying a web studio $6,000-$35,000. stop wiring GSAP, Lenis, and frame extraction by hand. Claude Code writes it. Higgsfield renders it. WHAT THE BUILD PRODUCES: → a fully animated, scroll-driven site → cinematic motion clips from 30+ generative models → GSAP ScrollTrigger timelines - zero hand-coded keyframes → Lenis smooth-scroll, tuned pacing → automated frame extraction + asset optimization → six cinematic effects baked in: film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints, scroll pacing → responsive layout + copy THE STACK: → Claude Code - concept, scaffolding, scroll code, QA → Higgsfield (MCP) - hero clips, transitions, ambient loops, thumbnails → GSAP + Lenis - the motion layer, written for you CONNECT HIGGSFIELD (MCP): add it as a custom connector in Claude Code: mcp_servers: higgsfield: url: " one OAuth flow. done. now Claude can generate and pull clips directly - no manual exporting. WHAT TO PROMPT: concept + scroll: "read this brief, script the scroll - what the visitor feels at second 3, 15, 40. scaffold the site with GSAP ScrollTrigger + Lenis." motion assets: "generate the hero sting and one b-roll clip per section from the story. 3–5s, high-res." polish pass: "bake in film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints, scroll pacing. no config." QA: "check load speed, mobile breakpoints, and whether the scroll actually lands. rewrite whatever doesn't." WHAT THIS REPLACES: → web studio build: $6,000-$35,000+ → motion artist: $800-2,000/project → front-end dev: $2,000-10,000/project → weeks of handoffs: gone Fable 5 + Higgsfield: a subscription + a few dollars of credits. one session. SETUP IN 10 MINUTES: - install Claude Code - add the Higgsfield MCP + authenticate - drop your brief + references - let it scaffold, generate, and animate in one pass - preview, send fixes in plain English, ship the pipeline was the moat. it just became a prompt. Follow me, comment "WEB" and I'll send you the full step-by-step Playbook. full breakdown in the article 👇
0:14

FABLE 5 + HIGGSFIELD CAN BUILD A $35,000 ANIMATED WEBSITE. IN ONE AGENTIC SESSION. FOR ~$12 IN CREDITS. stop paying a web studio $6,000-$35,000. stop wiring GSAP, Lenis, and frame extraction by hand. Claude Code writes it. Higgsfield renders it. WHAT THE BUILD PRODUCES: → a fully animated, scroll-driven site → cinematic motion clips from 30+ generative models → GSAP ScrollTrigger timelines - zero hand-coded keyframes → Lenis smooth-scroll, tuned pacing → automated frame extraction + asset optimization → six cinematic effects baked in: film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints, scroll pacing → responsive layout + copy THE STACK: → Claude Code - concept, scaffolding, scroll code, QA → Higgsfield (MCP) - hero clips, transitions, ambient loops, thumbnails → GSAP + Lenis - the motion layer, written for you CONNECT HIGGSFIELD (MCP): add it as a custom connector in Claude Code: mcp_servers: higgsfield: url: " one OAuth flow. done. now Claude can generate and pull clips directly - no manual exporting. WHAT TO PROMPT: concept + scroll: "read this brief, script the scroll - what the visitor feels at second 3, 15, 40. scaffold the site with GSAP ScrollTrigger + Lenis." motion assets: "generate the hero sting and one b-roll clip per section from the story. 3–5s, high-res." polish pass: "bake in film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints, scroll pacing. no config." QA: "check load speed, mobile breakpoints, and whether the scroll actually lands. rewrite whatever doesn't." WHAT THIS REPLACES: → web studio build: $6,000-$35,000+ → motion artist: $800-2,000/project → front-end dev: $2,000-10,000/project → weeks of handoffs: gone Fable 5 + Higgsfield: a subscription + a few dollars of credits. one session. SETUP IN 10 MINUTES: - install Claude Code - add the Higgsfield MCP + authenticate - drop your brief + references - let it scaffold, generate, and animate in one pass - preview, send fixes in plain English, ship the pipeline was the moat. it just became a prompt. Follow me, comment "WEB" and I'll send you the full step-by-step Playbook. full breakdown in the article 👇

ZEUS⚡️

566,304 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

FABLE 5 + HIGGSFIELD JUST KILLED THE $35,000 WEB STUDIO. WEEKS AND A TEAM OF FOUR → ONE SESSION, $12. stop paying a studio $6,000-$35,000. stop wiring GSAP, Lenis, and frame extraction by hand. Claude Code writes it. Higgsfield renders it. WHAT SHIPS OUT OF ONE SESSION: → a fully animated, scroll-driven site → cinematic motion clips from 30+ generative models → GSAP ScrollTrigger timelines - zero hand-coded keyframes → Lenis smooth-scroll, tuned pacing → automated frame extraction + asset optimization → six cinematic effects, no config: film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints, scroll pacing → responsive layout + copy THE STACK: → Claude Code - concept, scaffolding, scroll code, QA → Higgsfield (MCP) - hero clips, transitions, ambient loops, thumbnails → GSAP + Lenis - the motion layer, written for you CONNECT HIGGSFIELD (MCP): add it as a custom connector in Claude Code: - mcp_servers: - higgsfield: - url: " one OAuth flow. done. now Claude generates and pulls clips directly - no manual exporting. WHAT TO PROMPT: concept + scroll: "read this brief, script the scroll - what the visitor feels at second 3, 15, 40. scaffold with GSAP ScrollTrigger + Lenis." motion assets: "generate the hero sting and one b-roll clip per section. 3-5s, high-res." polish pass: "bake in film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints, scroll pacing. no config." QA: "check load speed, mobile breakpoints, and whether the scroll actually lands. rewrite whatever doesn't." WHAT THIS REPLACES: → web studio build: $6,000-$35,000+ → motion artist: $800-2,000/project → front-end dev: $2,000-10,000/project → weeks of handoffs: gone Fable 5 + Higgsfield: a subscription + a few dollars of credits. one session. SETUP IN 10 MINUTES: - install Claude Code - add the Higgsfield MCP + authenticate - drop your brief + references let it scaffold, generate, and animate in one pass preview, send fixes in plain English, ship the pipeline was the moat. it just became a prompt. Follow me, comment "PAGE" and I'll send you the full step-by-step Playbook. full breakdown in the article 👇
0:13

FABLE 5 + HIGGSFIELD JUST KILLED THE $35,000 WEB STUDIO. WEEKS AND A TEAM OF FOUR → ONE SESSION, $12. stop paying a studio $6,000-$35,000. stop wiring GSAP, Lenis, and frame extraction by hand. Claude Code writes it. Higgsfield renders it. WHAT SHIPS OUT OF ONE SESSION: → a fully animated, scroll-driven site → cinematic motion clips from 30+ generative models → GSAP ScrollTrigger timelines - zero hand-coded keyframes → Lenis smooth-scroll, tuned pacing → automated frame extraction + asset optimization → six cinematic effects, no config: film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints, scroll pacing → responsive layout + copy THE STACK: → Claude Code - concept, scaffolding, scroll code, QA → Higgsfield (MCP) - hero clips, transitions, ambient loops, thumbnails → GSAP + Lenis - the motion layer, written for you CONNECT HIGGSFIELD (MCP): add it as a custom connector in Claude Code: - mcp_servers: - higgsfield: - url: " one OAuth flow. done. now Claude generates and pulls clips directly - no manual exporting. WHAT TO PROMPT: concept + scroll: "read this brief, script the scroll - what the visitor feels at second 3, 15, 40. scaffold with GSAP ScrollTrigger + Lenis." motion assets: "generate the hero sting and one b-roll clip per section. 3-5s, high-res." polish pass: "bake in film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints, scroll pacing. no config." QA: "check load speed, mobile breakpoints, and whether the scroll actually lands. rewrite whatever doesn't." WHAT THIS REPLACES: → web studio build: $6,000-$35,000+ → motion artist: $800-2,000/project → front-end dev: $2,000-10,000/project → weeks of handoffs: gone Fable 5 + Higgsfield: a subscription + a few dollars of credits. one session. SETUP IN 10 MINUTES: - install Claude Code - add the Higgsfield MCP + authenticate - drop your brief + references let it scaffold, generate, and animate in one pass preview, send fixes in plain English, ship the pipeline was the moat. it just became a prompt. Follow me, comment "PAGE" and I'll send you the full step-by-step Playbook. full breakdown in the article 👇

ZEUS⚡️

27,102 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

HE BUILT A $10,000-TIER ANIMATED SITE WITH CLAUDE CODE - FOR THE COST OF A SUBSCRIPTION What's on screen isn't a landing page with a parallax background It's a fully interactive, scroll-driven site with real-time 3D rendered in the browser What's actually on the page: > 3D product models rotating and reacting to scroll in real time via WebGL > Smooth hover interactions and transitions - no hand-coded keyframes > Cinematic minimal aesthetic that got featured on Awwwards > Typography layering, editorial layouts, everything assembled in one session What it normally takes: > A 3D artist, a motion designer, and a frontend developer > Weeks of handoffs - modelling, exporting, wiring animations, layout, copy > Six separate systems integrated by hand That pipeline was the moat. It's what justified the invoice The price gap: > Studio build at this level: $5,000-10,000+ > Your cost: a Claude subscription Timeline: weeks of production -> a single session Full walkthrough in the article below
0:16

HE BUILT A $10,000-TIER ANIMATED SITE WITH CLAUDE CODE - FOR THE COST OF A SUBSCRIPTION What's on screen isn't a landing page with a parallax background It's a fully interactive, scroll-driven site with real-time 3D rendered in the browser What's actually on the page: > 3D product models rotating and reacting to scroll in real time via WebGL > Smooth hover interactions and transitions - no hand-coded keyframes > Cinematic minimal aesthetic that got featured on Awwwards > Typography layering, editorial layouts, everything assembled in one session What it normally takes: > A 3D artist, a motion designer, and a frontend developer > Weeks of handoffs - modelling, exporting, wiring animations, layout, copy > Six separate systems integrated by hand That pipeline was the moat. It's what justified the invoice The price gap: > Studio build at this level: $5,000-10,000+ > Your cost: a Claude subscription Timeline: weeks of production -> a single session Full walkthrough in the article below

monokern

702,117 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

THIS GUY JUST REBUILT A $35,000 ANIMATED SITE FOR $12. IF YOU RUN A WEB STUDIO, YOU SHOULD PROBABLY KEEP SCROLLING. Every agency billing $100-149/hr is selling you five departments wearing one invoice. Here’s each one - collapsed into a single agentic session. LAYER 1 - THE CONCEPT ROOM (Claude) Reads the brief, pulls references, and scripts the scroll: what the visitor feels at second 3, second 15, second 40. → Used to be a strategist and a wall of mood boards. Now it’s a conversation. LAYER 2 - THE MOTION STUDIO (Higgsfield) Cinematic clips from 30+ generative models - hero shots, transitions, ambient loops - all matched to the story from Layer 1. → Used to be a motion artist on retainer. Now it’s a prompt. LAYER 3 - THE DEV TEAM (Claude Code) Scaffolds the site, writes the GSAP ScrollTrigger timelines and Lenis smooth-scroll, extracts frames, optimizes every asset. → A full scroll-driven build with zero hand-coded keyframes. LAYER 4 - THE DESIGN DEPT (baked-in cinematic layer) Six effects, zero config: film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints, scroll pacing. → The polish that justified the invoice - now it ships by default. LAYER 5 - THE QA PASS (Claude) Checks load speed, mobile breakpoints, and whether the scroll actually lands - then rewrites whatever doesn’t. → Used to be a client call and a revision cycle. Now it’s one more turn in the same session. Five departments. One operator. One pass. A strategist, a motion artist, a developer, a designer, and a QA lead - weeks of handoffs - now run in a single session. For a Claude subscription and a few dollars of Higgsfield credits. The studio was never selling talent. It was selling overhead. And the overhead just became five layers. Follow me, reply “website” to this post and I will send you the step-by-step Playbook 👇
0:14

THIS GUY JUST REBUILT A $35,000 ANIMATED SITE FOR $12. IF YOU RUN A WEB STUDIO, YOU SHOULD PROBABLY KEEP SCROLLING. Every agency billing $100-149/hr is selling you five departments wearing one invoice. Here’s each one - collapsed into a single agentic session. LAYER 1 - THE CONCEPT ROOM (Claude) Reads the brief, pulls references, and scripts the scroll: what the visitor feels at second 3, second 15, second 40. → Used to be a strategist and a wall of mood boards. Now it’s a conversation. LAYER 2 - THE MOTION STUDIO (Higgsfield) Cinematic clips from 30+ generative models - hero shots, transitions, ambient loops - all matched to the story from Layer 1. → Used to be a motion artist on retainer. Now it’s a prompt. LAYER 3 - THE DEV TEAM (Claude Code) Scaffolds the site, writes the GSAP ScrollTrigger timelines and Lenis smooth-scroll, extracts frames, optimizes every asset. → A full scroll-driven build with zero hand-coded keyframes. LAYER 4 - THE DESIGN DEPT (baked-in cinematic layer) Six effects, zero config: film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints, scroll pacing. → The polish that justified the invoice - now it ships by default. LAYER 5 - THE QA PASS (Claude) Checks load speed, mobile breakpoints, and whether the scroll actually lands - then rewrites whatever doesn’t. → Used to be a client call and a revision cycle. Now it’s one more turn in the same session. Five departments. One operator. One pass. A strategist, a motion artist, a developer, a designer, and a QA lead - weeks of handoffs - now run in a single session. For a Claude subscription and a few dollars of Higgsfield credits. The studio was never selling talent. It was selling overhead. And the overhead just became five layers. Follow me, reply “website” to this post and I will send you the step-by-step Playbook 👇

ZEUS⚡️

141,226 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

FABLE 5 + HIGGSFIELD JUST KILLED THE $35,000 WEB AGENCY. The same animated website that used to cost between $6,000 and $35,000 can now be built in a single session for around $12 in AI credits. Claude Code handles the website. Higgsfield creates the visuals. Together, they can build a complete scroll-driven website from a simple prompt. Claude writes the layout, GSAP ScrollTrigger animations, Lenis smooth scrolling, responsive pages, and checks everything before you ship. Higgsfield generates the hero videos, cinematic transitions, ambient loops, thumbnails, and every visual asset you need. By the end of one session, you have a fully animated website with cinematic motion, smooth scrolling, optimized assets, responsive layouts, and polished visual effects like film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, and color tints. Getting started only takes a few minutes. Add Higgsfield as an MCP server inside Claude Code, complete the OAuth login once, and Claude can generate and pull videos directly into your project without manually exporting anything. The prompts are simple. Give Claude your project brief and ask it to script the entire scroll experience. Tell it to generate a hero video and supporting clips for every section. Ask it to add the finishing touches like film grain, particles, glass cards, and scroll pacing. Then let it review the site, improve loading speed, fix mobile layouts, and rewrite anything that doesn’t work. This replaces work that usually looks like this: A $6,000-$35,000 web agency. An $800-$2,000 motion designer. A $2,000-$10,000 front-end developer. And weeks of back-and-forth before launch. Now it’s Fable 5, Higgsfield, a subscription, a few dollars in AI credits, and one session. The pipeline used to be the advantage. Now it’s just a prompt. Full breakdown in the article below.
0:16

FABLE 5 + HIGGSFIELD JUST KILLED THE $35,000 WEB AGENCY. The same animated website that used to cost between $6,000 and $35,000 can now be built in a single session for around $12 in AI credits. Claude Code handles the website. Higgsfield creates the visuals. Together, they can build a complete scroll-driven website from a simple prompt. Claude writes the layout, GSAP ScrollTrigger animations, Lenis smooth scrolling, responsive pages, and checks everything before you ship. Higgsfield generates the hero videos, cinematic transitions, ambient loops, thumbnails, and every visual asset you need. By the end of one session, you have a fully animated website with cinematic motion, smooth scrolling, optimized assets, responsive layouts, and polished visual effects like film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, and color tints. Getting started only takes a few minutes. Add Higgsfield as an MCP server inside Claude Code, complete the OAuth login once, and Claude can generate and pull videos directly into your project without manually exporting anything. The prompts are simple. Give Claude your project brief and ask it to script the entire scroll experience. Tell it to generate a hero video and supporting clips for every section. Ask it to add the finishing touches like film grain, particles, glass cards, and scroll pacing. Then let it review the site, improve loading speed, fix mobile layouts, and rewrite anything that doesn’t work. This replaces work that usually looks like this: A $6,000-$35,000 web agency. An $800-$2,000 motion designer. A $2,000-$10,000 front-end developer. And weeks of back-and-forth before launch. Now it’s Fable 5, Higgsfield, a subscription, a few dollars in AI credits, and one session. The pipeline used to be the advantage. Now it’s just a prompt. Full breakdown in the article below.

MIKE

141,361 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

A $35,000 WEBSITE IS SOLD ON 3 LIES. FABLE 5 + HIGGSFIELD JUST EXPOSED ALL THREE. every agency invoice rests on three things they'd rather you never question. here they are: → LIE 1: "custom animation takes weeks." it takes one prompt. Claude writes the GSAP ScrollTrigger + Lenis timelines - pinned sections, scrubbed video, reveals that land. zero hand-coded keyframes. → LIE 2: "cinematic visuals need a motion artist on retainer." they don't. Higgsfield pulls hero clips, transitions, and ambient loops from 30+ generative models, matched to your story - not stock everyone's seen. → LIE 3: "the polish is where your money goes." film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints - baked in, no config, no designer. the exact thing they bill a specialist for. strip the three lies and what's left is a Claude sub and a few dollars of credits. CONNECT HIGGSFIELD (MCP): add it as a custom connector in Claude Code: - mcp_servers: - higgsfield: - url: " one OAuth flow. Claude generates and pulls clips directly - no exporting by hand. THE MATH: → what a studio charges: $6,000-$35,000+ → what it costs you: a Claude sub + a few dollars of Higgsfield credits → what it takes: 4 people + 3 weeks → 1 operator + 1 session the studio never sold you skill. it sold you three things it hoped you'd never check. Follow me, reply "GHOST" and I'll send you the full step-by-step Playbook. full breakdown in the article 👇
0:13

A $35,000 WEBSITE IS SOLD ON 3 LIES. FABLE 5 + HIGGSFIELD JUST EXPOSED ALL THREE. every agency invoice rests on three things they'd rather you never question. here they are: → LIE 1: "custom animation takes weeks." it takes one prompt. Claude writes the GSAP ScrollTrigger + Lenis timelines - pinned sections, scrubbed video, reveals that land. zero hand-coded keyframes. → LIE 2: "cinematic visuals need a motion artist on retainer." they don't. Higgsfield pulls hero clips, transitions, and ambient loops from 30+ generative models, matched to your story - not stock everyone's seen. → LIE 3: "the polish is where your money goes." film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints - baked in, no config, no designer. the exact thing they bill a specialist for. strip the three lies and what's left is a Claude sub and a few dollars of credits. CONNECT HIGGSFIELD (MCP): add it as a custom connector in Claude Code: - mcp_servers: - higgsfield: - url: " one OAuth flow. Claude generates and pulls clips directly - no exporting by hand. THE MATH: → what a studio charges: $6,000-$35,000+ → what it costs you: a Claude sub + a few dollars of Higgsfield credits → what it takes: 4 people + 3 weeks → 1 operator + 1 session the studio never sold you skill. it sold you three things it hoped you'd never check. Follow me, reply "GHOST" and I'll send you the full step-by-step Playbook. full breakdown in the article 👇

ZEUS⚡️

32,500 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

FABLE 5 + HIGGSFIELD BUILT A $35,000 ANIMATED SITE IN 50 MINUTES FOR $27 IN CREDITS. HERE'S THE ACTUAL RECEIPT. no theory. this is the play-by-play from the last one I shipped: → 0:00 - brief + scroll concept (Claude) 4 min. $0. it reads the brief and scripts what the visitor feels at second 3, 15, 40. → 0:04 - hero clip + b-roll (Higgsfield) 9 min. ~$27 in credits. cinematic footage from 30+ models, matched to the story. → 0:13 - the build (Claude Code) 20 min. $0. GSAP ScrollTrigger + Lenis, frame extraction, asset optimization. zero hand-coded keyframes. → 0:33 - cinematic layer 6 min. $0. film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints - baked in, no config. → 0:39 - QA + copy + mobile 12 min. $0. checks load speed, breakpoints, whether the scroll lands. rewrites what doesn't. TOTAL: ~51 minutes. ~$27 in credits. 1 operator. the same brief at a studio: 4 people, 3 weeks, $6,000-$35,000. same deliverable. CONNECT HIGGSFIELD (MCP): add it as a custom connector in Claude Code: - mcp_servers: - higgsfield: - url: " one OAuth flow. Claude generates and pulls clips directly - no exporting by hand. the invoice was never the work. now you can literally time the work. Follow me, reply "RECEIPT" and I'll send you the full step-by-step Playbook. full breakdown in the article 👇
0:12

FABLE 5 + HIGGSFIELD BUILT A $35,000 ANIMATED SITE IN 50 MINUTES FOR $27 IN CREDITS. HERE'S THE ACTUAL RECEIPT. no theory. this is the play-by-play from the last one I shipped: → 0:00 - brief + scroll concept (Claude) 4 min. $0. it reads the brief and scripts what the visitor feels at second 3, 15, 40. → 0:04 - hero clip + b-roll (Higgsfield) 9 min. ~$27 in credits. cinematic footage from 30+ models, matched to the story. → 0:13 - the build (Claude Code) 20 min. $0. GSAP ScrollTrigger + Lenis, frame extraction, asset optimization. zero hand-coded keyframes. → 0:33 - cinematic layer 6 min. $0. film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints - baked in, no config. → 0:39 - QA + copy + mobile 12 min. $0. checks load speed, breakpoints, whether the scroll lands. rewrites what doesn't. TOTAL: ~51 minutes. ~$27 in credits. 1 operator. the same brief at a studio: 4 people, 3 weeks, $6,000-$35,000. same deliverable. CONNECT HIGGSFIELD (MCP): add it as a custom connector in Claude Code: - mcp_servers: - higgsfield: - url: " one OAuth flow. Claude generates and pulls clips directly - no exporting by hand. the invoice was never the work. now you can literally time the work. Follow me, reply "RECEIPT" and I'll send you the full step-by-step Playbook. full breakdown in the article 👇

ZEUS⚡️

31,502 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

WHEN FABLE 5 + HIGGSFIELD FINISH A $35K SITE, HERE'S EVERYTHING THAT'S ACTUALLY IN THE FOLDER. no mockups, no "phase 2 next week." this is what ships - ready to hand a client: → the live site a scroll-driven build - GSAP ScrollTrigger + Lenis, pinned sections, scrubbed video, zero hand-coded keyframes. → the footage (yours to keep) a hero clip + one b-roll per section, generated in Higgsfield from 30+ models. not licensed stock - owned outright. → the optimized assets frames extracted, converted to WebP, lazy-loaded. loads instant, even on mobile. → the cinematic layer film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints - baked in, no plugins, no designer. → copy + responsive layout section copy drafted, breakpoints handled, mobile-tuned. that's the full studio deliverable. minus the studio, minus the month, minus the invoice. CONNECT HIGGSFIELD (MCP): add it as a custom connector in Claude Code: - mcp_servers: - higgsfield: - url: " one OAuth flow. Claude generates and pulls clips directly - no exporting by hand. THE MATH: → what a studio charges: $6,000-$35,000+ → what it costs you: a Claude sub + a few dollars of Higgsfield credits → what it takes: 4 people + 3 weeks → 1 operator + 1 session agencies sold you the folder. they just took a month and $35k to fill it. Follow me, reply "FOLDER" and I'll send you the full step-by-step Playbook. full breakdown in the article 👇
0:11

WHEN FABLE 5 + HIGGSFIELD FINISH A $35K SITE, HERE'S EVERYTHING THAT'S ACTUALLY IN THE FOLDER. no mockups, no "phase 2 next week." this is what ships - ready to hand a client: → the live site a scroll-driven build - GSAP ScrollTrigger + Lenis, pinned sections, scrubbed video, zero hand-coded keyframes. → the footage (yours to keep) a hero clip + one b-roll per section, generated in Higgsfield from 30+ models. not licensed stock - owned outright. → the optimized assets frames extracted, converted to WebP, lazy-loaded. loads instant, even on mobile. → the cinematic layer film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints - baked in, no plugins, no designer. → copy + responsive layout section copy drafted, breakpoints handled, mobile-tuned. that's the full studio deliverable. minus the studio, minus the month, minus the invoice. CONNECT HIGGSFIELD (MCP): add it as a custom connector in Claude Code: - mcp_servers: - higgsfield: - url: " one OAuth flow. Claude generates and pulls clips directly - no exporting by hand. THE MATH: → what a studio charges: $6,000-$35,000+ → what it costs you: a Claude sub + a few dollars of Higgsfield credits → what it takes: 4 people + 3 weeks → 1 operator + 1 session agencies sold you the folder. they just took a month and $35k to fill it. Follow me, reply "FOLDER" and I'll send you the full step-by-step Playbook. full breakdown in the article 👇

ZEUS⚡️

20,842 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

HIGGSFIELD + FABLE 5 MADE A SITE THAT LOOKS LIKE A $35,000 STUDIO JOB FOR $12. NOBODY'S CLOCKED IT YET. the cheap giveaway of an AI-built site is always the same: stocky visuals, dead scroll, zero polish. this skips all three. what actually makes it read as $35k: → REAL MOTION, NOT STOCK the clips come from 30+ generative models, matched to your story - not the same three stock loops everyone's already seen. → SCROLL WITH WEIGHT GSAP ScrollTrigger + Lenis give it pacing and feel - pinned sections, scrubbed video, reveals that land. this is the thing that makes expensive sites feel expensive. → THE CINEMATIC LAYER film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints - baked in, no config. it's the polish agencies charge a designer for. → TASTE IS THE INPUT the AI executes; you direct. point real judgment at the stack and it ships premium. point lazy prompts at it and yeah - you get slop. that part's on you. CONNECT HIGGSFIELD (MCP): add it as a custom connector in Claude Code: - mcp_servers: - higgsfield: - url: " one OAuth flow. Claude generates and pulls clips directly - no exporting by hand. THE MATH: → what a studio charges: $6,000-$35,000+ → what it costs you: a Claude sub + a few dollars of Higgsfield credits → what it takes: 4 people + 3 weeks → 1 operator + 1 session the tools were never the bottleneck. taste was. now taste is the only input left. Follow me, reply "LAUNCH" and I'll send you the full step-by-step Playbook. full breakdown in the article 👇
0:19

HIGGSFIELD + FABLE 5 MADE A SITE THAT LOOKS LIKE A $35,000 STUDIO JOB FOR $12. NOBODY'S CLOCKED IT YET. the cheap giveaway of an AI-built site is always the same: stocky visuals, dead scroll, zero polish. this skips all three. what actually makes it read as $35k: → REAL MOTION, NOT STOCK the clips come from 30+ generative models, matched to your story - not the same three stock loops everyone's already seen. → SCROLL WITH WEIGHT GSAP ScrollTrigger + Lenis give it pacing and feel - pinned sections, scrubbed video, reveals that land. this is the thing that makes expensive sites feel expensive. → THE CINEMATIC LAYER film grain, particles, vignette, glass cards, color tints - baked in, no config. it's the polish agencies charge a designer for. → TASTE IS THE INPUT the AI executes; you direct. point real judgment at the stack and it ships premium. point lazy prompts at it and yeah - you get slop. that part's on you. CONNECT HIGGSFIELD (MCP): add it as a custom connector in Claude Code: - mcp_servers: - higgsfield: - url: " one OAuth flow. Claude generates and pulls clips directly - no exporting by hand. THE MATH: → what a studio charges: $6,000-$35,000+ → what it costs you: a Claude sub + a few dollars of Higgsfield credits → what it takes: 4 people + 3 weeks → 1 operator + 1 session the tools were never the bottleneck. taste was. now taste is the only input left. Follow me, reply "LAUNCH" and I'll send you the full step-by-step Playbook. full breakdown in the article 👇

ZEUS⚡️

80,527 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

FABLE 5 + HIGGSFIELD JUST DELETED THE ONLY REASON A $35K/MONTH WEB AGENCY ISN'T RICH: PAYROLL. the difference was never the work. it was the payroll eating the invoice. where a staffed shop's money disappears every month: → a designer - ~$6k → a motion artist - ~$6k → a developer - ~$8k → a PM + overhead - ~$5k = ~$25k gone before you pay yourself. the solo stack that does all four roles: → Claude Code - concept, scaffolding, scroll code, QA → Higgsfield - hero clips, transitions, thumbnails from 30+ generative models → 1 operator directing both in a single session same site ships. the payroll just doesn't exist. CONNECT HIGGSFIELD (MCP): add it as a custom connector in Claude Code: - mcp_servers: - higgsfield: - url: " one OAuth flow. Claude generates and pulls clips directly - no exporting by hand. THE MATH: → staffed agency: $35k revenue → ~$10k kept → solo operator: $35k revenue → ~$34k kept → cost of the stack: a Claude sub + a few dollars of Higgsfield credits the agency model was never selling skill. it was selling salaries you paid for. Follow me, reply "STACK" and I'll send you the full step-by-step Playbook. full breakdown in the article 👇
0:13

FABLE 5 + HIGGSFIELD JUST DELETED THE ONLY REASON A $35K/MONTH WEB AGENCY ISN'T RICH: PAYROLL. the difference was never the work. it was the payroll eating the invoice. where a staffed shop's money disappears every month: → a designer - ~$6k → a motion artist - ~$6k → a developer - ~$8k → a PM + overhead - ~$5k = ~$25k gone before you pay yourself. the solo stack that does all four roles: → Claude Code - concept, scaffolding, scroll code, QA → Higgsfield - hero clips, transitions, thumbnails from 30+ generative models → 1 operator directing both in a single session same site ships. the payroll just doesn't exist. CONNECT HIGGSFIELD (MCP): add it as a custom connector in Claude Code: - mcp_servers: - higgsfield: - url: " one OAuth flow. Claude generates and pulls clips directly - no exporting by hand. THE MATH: → staffed agency: $35k revenue → ~$10k kept → solo operator: $35k revenue → ~$34k kept → cost of the stack: a Claude sub + a few dollars of Higgsfield credits the agency model was never selling skill. it was selling salaries you paid for. Follow me, reply "STACK" and I'll send you the full step-by-step Playbook. full breakdown in the article 👇

ZEUS⚡️

26,967 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

HE DESCRIBED A SITE TO CLAUDE CODE AND WALKED AWAY FOR 8 MINUTES What came back looked like a studio spent weeks on it. The setup that made it work: > Two design skills installed - Claude stops using safe boring defaults. > Visual references instead of text descriptions. > One detailed prompt with the concept, Claude asks clarifying questions before building. First version already solid -> review pass, one batch of fixes, done. What used to take a designer and a developer and several weeks of handoffs now takes a single session and no coding experience. Full walkthrough in the article below ↓
0:16

HE DESCRIBED A SITE TO CLAUDE CODE AND WALKED AWAY FOR 8 MINUTES What came back looked like a studio spent weeks on it. The setup that made it work: > Two design skills installed - Claude stops using safe boring defaults. > Visual references instead of text descriptions. > One detailed prompt with the concept, Claude asks clarifying questions before building. First version already solid -> review pass, one batch of fixes, done. What used to take a designer and a developer and several weeks of handoffs now takes a single session and no coding experience. Full walkthrough in the article below ↓

slash1s

52,905 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

MOST PEOPLE WHO BUILD WEBSITES USE CLAUDE CODE THE WRONG WAY A few people train Claude the right way and get the bottom one. The difference is not the model. It is the skills you feed it. Regular Claude without web-design systems produces clean but average product pages. The same Claude, loaded with the right skills, starts delivering sites that look like they cost $5,000. Dark hero. Cinematic pizza shots. Smooth scroll reveals. Menu cards that feel expensive. Zero templates. Those skills are free right now. They live on GitHub. The exact names sit in the article below. One set of prompts. One trained workflow. Suddenly every food brand page you build stops looking like a template and starts looking like money.
0:17

MOST PEOPLE WHO BUILD WEBSITES USE CLAUDE CODE THE WRONG WAY A few people train Claude the right way and get the bottom one. The difference is not the model. It is the skills you feed it. Regular Claude without web-design systems produces clean but average product pages. The same Claude, loaded with the right skills, starts delivering sites that look like they cost $5,000. Dark hero. Cinematic pizza shots. Smooth scroll reveals. Menu cards that feel expensive. Zero templates. Those skills are free right now. They live on GitHub. The exact names sit in the article below. One set of prompts. One trained workflow. Suddenly every food brand page you build stops looking like a template and starts looking like money.

Romario

51,126 görüntüleme • 14 gün önce

CLIENT ASKED 20 YEAR OLD TO BUILD A "SIMPLE" WEBSITE THIS IS WHAT IT DELIVERED most websites look like this: -> Hero section -> Some text -> A few buttons -> Done Claude had other plans Here's what it built: -> Cinematic landing page with immersive animations -> Interactive particle effects -> Smooth scroll storytelling -> Premium UI inspired by Apple and luxury brands -> Responsive design without sacrificing performance → Production ready code in minutes the crazy part? there was no design agency no frontend team no weeks of back and forth revisions just one prompt and Claude Code while most developers are using AI to autocomplete code others are using it to build experiences that would've taken an entire team the gap isn't AI anymore it is imagination Bookmark this before every website starts looking like this
0:12

CLIENT ASKED 20 YEAR OLD TO BUILD A "SIMPLE" WEBSITE THIS IS WHAT IT DELIVERED most websites look like this: -> Hero section -> Some text -> A few buttons -> Done Claude had other plans Here's what it built: -> Cinematic landing page with immersive animations -> Interactive particle effects -> Smooth scroll storytelling -> Premium UI inspired by Apple and luxury brands -> Responsive design without sacrificing performance → Production ready code in minutes the crazy part? there was no design agency no frontend team no weeks of back and forth revisions just one prompt and Claude Code while most developers are using AI to autocomplete code others are using it to build experiences that would've taken an entire team the gap isn't AI anymore it is imagination Bookmark this before every website starts looking like this

0xSlyth

17,945 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Fable 5 just dropped and someone already built a $10k-looking website with it. Here's the full workflow The smooth scrolling, the animations, the transitions, all built with Fable 5. Here's how to get the same result instead of a generic template. 1. Steal a direction first. Go to Mobbin or Godly and find a site whose feel you love. Screenshot it. Fable copies a vibe far better than it invents one. 2. Grab real components. Pull animation-ready blocks from Aceternity UI or Magic UI. These are built for exactly this look (scroll reveals, parallax, gradients). 3. Prompt Fable with all of it. Switch to Fable 5 in Claude Code, drop in your screenshots and the component references, and describe the sections and scroll behavior you want. Let it plan before it builds. 4. Animate with the right tools. Tell it to use GSAP with ScrollTrigger for scroll effects, or Framer Motion for React. This is what separates "nice" from "$10k." 5. Iterate on feel, not code. Preview it, then give Fable specific notes ("slower fade, more spacing on mobile") until it lands. Bookmark this
0:16

Fable 5 just dropped and someone already built a $10k-looking website with it. Here's the full workflow The smooth scrolling, the animations, the transitions, all built with Fable 5. Here's how to get the same result instead of a generic template. 1. Steal a direction first. Go to Mobbin or Godly and find a site whose feel you love. Screenshot it. Fable copies a vibe far better than it invents one. 2. Grab real components. Pull animation-ready blocks from Aceternity UI or Magic UI. These are built for exactly this look (scroll reveals, parallax, gradients). 3. Prompt Fable with all of it. Switch to Fable 5 in Claude Code, drop in your screenshots and the component references, and describe the sections and scroll behavior you want. Let it plan before it builds. 4. Animate with the right tools. Tell it to use GSAP with ScrollTrigger for scroll effects, or Framer Motion for React. This is what separates "nice" from "$10k." 5. Iterate on feel, not code. Preview it, then give Fable specific notes ("slower fade, more spacing on mobile") until it lands. Bookmark this

Fokki

72,175 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Claude Code + Higgsfield MCP is f*cking cracked 🤯 I built an entire DTC ad campaign inside Claude Code using the new Higgsfield MCP. One product URL → hero static, animated hero shot, 2 UGC clips with a creator wearing the product. 5 assets. One Claude conversation. 3 Higgsfield models. All inside Claude Code. Perfect for DTC brands and agencies who need full campaign packages without booking a shoot or briefing a designer. If you're spending hours every week generating statics in one tool, briefing a motion designer for the hero clip, then chasing a UGC creator for the talking-head shots — this MCP eliminates the entire pipeline: → Drop a product URL into Claude Code → Claude pulls the brand brief — voice, hero SKUs, visual style, target customer → Generates the hero static with ChatGPT Images 2.0 → Animates it into a 5-second cinematic opener with Seedance 2.0 → Generates a UGC creator with GPT Image 2 → Drops her in the product and generates 2 native UGC video clips with Seedance 2.0 No tab-switching between tools. No copy-pasting prompts between platforms. No briefing 3 different vendors for one campaign. What you get: → A complete campaign package — static, animation, UGC — from one product URL → Brand-specific outputs that pull from a real brief, not generic AI slop → Claude making creative decisions between every step (which variation wins, which creator fits the persona, which clip needs a re-spin) → A repeatable pipeline you can run for any product in your catalog Built 100% in Claude Code with the Higgsfield MCP. I recorded a full walkthrough showing exactly how this works: the MCP setup, every prompt, every model, the full campaign output. Want the full video walkthrough? > Like this post > Comment "MCP" And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)
0:12

Claude Code + Higgsfield MCP is f*cking cracked 🤯 I built an entire DTC ad campaign inside Claude Code using the new Higgsfield MCP. One product URL → hero static, animated hero shot, 2 UGC clips with a creator wearing the product. 5 assets. One Claude conversation. 3 Higgsfield models. All inside Claude Code. Perfect for DTC brands and agencies who need full campaign packages without booking a shoot or briefing a designer. If you're spending hours every week generating statics in one tool, briefing a motion designer for the hero clip, then chasing a UGC creator for the talking-head shots — this MCP eliminates the entire pipeline: → Drop a product URL into Claude Code → Claude pulls the brand brief — voice, hero SKUs, visual style, target customer → Generates the hero static with ChatGPT Images 2.0 → Animates it into a 5-second cinematic opener with Seedance 2.0 → Generates a UGC creator with GPT Image 2 → Drops her in the product and generates 2 native UGC video clips with Seedance 2.0 No tab-switching between tools. No copy-pasting prompts between platforms. No briefing 3 different vendors for one campaign. What you get: → A complete campaign package — static, animation, UGC — from one product URL → Brand-specific outputs that pull from a real brief, not generic AI slop → Claude making creative decisions between every step (which variation wins, which creator fits the persona, which clip needs a re-spin) → A repeatable pipeline you can run for any product in your catalog Built 100% in Claude Code with the Higgsfield MCP. I recorded a full walkthrough showing exactly how this works: the MCP setup, every prompt, every model, the full campaign output. Want the full video walkthrough? > Like this post > Comment "MCP" And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)

Mike Futia

29,690 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Claude "Puzzling" while GPT 5.6 on GOD-MODE just bade a banger that's mindblowing. Here's the exact way to get a site like this, step by step: > open the desktop app, pick Sol, reasoning on High. taste work never goes to small models > drop it 3 sites with motion you love and one line: "reverse-engineer the art direction: mood, typography, pacing, and WHY each animation exists. save it as a style bible" > brief in one paragraph, goal not steps: "[your niche] site, cinematic scroll, every animation has a job. follow the bible" > house rules on top: no template hero, no stock gradients, nothing on the page moves without a reason > now the bar: "a motion designer can't tell this from an agency build." spin up a SECOND 5.6 with fresh context whose only job is to FAIL the build against that bar > /loop overnight: build, grade, close the biggest gap, again. you're asleep for all of it > when the verifier runs out of complaints: tag Sites. live URL, one click, zero hosting The deeper version of every step (the full contract, the house rules, the verifier trick, when Ultra is worth the bill) is in the article below. P.S. send the article to your GPT and tell it "we're doing this tonight".
0:12

Claude "Puzzling" while GPT 5.6 on GOD-MODE just bade a banger that's mindblowing. Here's the exact way to get a site like this, step by step: > open the desktop app, pick Sol, reasoning on High. taste work never goes to small models > drop it 3 sites with motion you love and one line: "reverse-engineer the art direction: mood, typography, pacing, and WHY each animation exists. save it as a style bible" > brief in one paragraph, goal not steps: "[your niche] site, cinematic scroll, every animation has a job. follow the bible" > house rules on top: no template hero, no stock gradients, nothing on the page moves without a reason > now the bar: "a motion designer can't tell this from an agency build." spin up a SECOND 5.6 with fresh context whose only job is to FAIL the build against that bar > /loop overnight: build, grade, close the biggest gap, again. you're asleep for all of it > when the verifier runs out of complaints: tag Sites. live URL, one click, zero hosting The deeper version of every step (the full contract, the house rules, the verifier trick, when Ultra is worth the bill) is in the article below. P.S. send the article to your GPT and tell it "we're doing this tonight".

Miraqle

206,624 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Claude Code + Google Stitch 2.0 is f*cking cracked 🤯 Google just dropped a free AI design agent that solves Claude Code's biggest weakness: frontend design. One screenshot of a high-converting landing page → a production-ready site for your brand in minutes. All inside Google Stitch + Claude Code. Perfect for DTC brands and agencies who are building advertorial pages and product launch pages for Meta but burning days on designer back-and-forth. If you're running Meta ads and need 5-10 different landing pages testing different hooks, angles, and offers — each one targeting a different audience and pain point — you know the bottleneck isn't the ads. It's the pages. Briefing designers, waiting for revisions, paying $2-5K per page. Stitch eliminates the design bottleneck: → Find a high-converting advertorial that's scaling on Meta → Screenshot it and drop it into Stitch (powered by Gemini 3.1) → Stitch redesigns it with your brand's colors, fonts, and imagery using Nano Banana 2 → Edit sections visually — headlines, CTAs, layouts — without touching code → Export the code and paste it into Claude Code → Claude builds the full production site and deploys to Vercel or Netlify in 60 seconds No designer. No $3K per landing page. No Claude Code frontend that looks like a template from 2019. What you get: → Designer-quality landing pages and advertorials built in minutes, not weeks → Visual editing so you actually see the design before you code it → Nano Banana 2 generating on-brand product imagery and hero shots → A repeatable system — new angle, new page, same pipeline Built 100% with Google Stitch 2.0 + Claude Code. I put together a full playbook showing the exact workflow: how to find winning pages, redesign them in Stitch, and deploy with Claude Code. Want it for free? > Like this post > Comment "STITCH" And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)
0:14

Claude Code + Google Stitch 2.0 is f*cking cracked 🤯 Google just dropped a free AI design agent that solves Claude Code's biggest weakness: frontend design. One screenshot of a high-converting landing page → a production-ready site for your brand in minutes. All inside Google Stitch + Claude Code. Perfect for DTC brands and agencies who are building advertorial pages and product launch pages for Meta but burning days on designer back-and-forth. If you're running Meta ads and need 5-10 different landing pages testing different hooks, angles, and offers — each one targeting a different audience and pain point — you know the bottleneck isn't the ads. It's the pages. Briefing designers, waiting for revisions, paying $2-5K per page. Stitch eliminates the design bottleneck: → Find a high-converting advertorial that's scaling on Meta → Screenshot it and drop it into Stitch (powered by Gemini 3.1) → Stitch redesigns it with your brand's colors, fonts, and imagery using Nano Banana 2 → Edit sections visually — headlines, CTAs, layouts — without touching code → Export the code and paste it into Claude Code → Claude builds the full production site and deploys to Vercel or Netlify in 60 seconds No designer. No $3K per landing page. No Claude Code frontend that looks like a template from 2019. What you get: → Designer-quality landing pages and advertorials built in minutes, not weeks → Visual editing so you actually see the design before you code it → Nano Banana 2 generating on-brand product imagery and hero shots → A repeatable system — new angle, new page, same pipeline Built 100% with Google Stitch 2.0 + Claude Code. I put together a full playbook showing the exact workflow: how to find winning pages, redesign them in Stitch, and deploy with Claude Code. Want it for free? > Like this post > Comment "STITCH" And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)

Mike Futia

126,180 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

THIS GUY BOUGHT A $31 TOY DRONE AND TURNED CLAUDE OPUS 4.8 INTO ITS ENGINEER he plugged it into a laptop, explained the control logic in plain english and let Claude build the flight interface by the end of the session it had calibration, live controls and a browser cockpit moving the drone in real time most people will use Opus 4.8 to save 12 minutes on emails. he used it to turn cheap plastic into a working demo the crazy part isn’t the drone. it’s that the bottleneck moved from writing code to describing exactly what you want built while everyone debates benchmarks, someone with a $31 gadget and one afternoon is already shipping hardware demos
0:14

THIS GUY BOUGHT A $31 TOY DRONE AND TURNED CLAUDE OPUS 4.8 INTO ITS ENGINEER he plugged it into a laptop, explained the control logic in plain english and let Claude build the flight interface by the end of the session it had calibration, live controls and a browser cockpit moving the drone in real time most people will use Opus 4.8 to save 12 minutes on emails. he used it to turn cheap plastic into a working demo the crazy part isn’t the drone. it’s that the bottleneck moved from writing code to describing exactly what you want built while everyone debates benchmarks, someone with a $31 gadget and one afternoon is already shipping hardware demos

Gipp 🦅

735,627 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce