正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

He walks through a simple thought experiment that anyone can verify at home: plug in an electric razor, set it on a smooth desktop, turn it on, and watch it move. The vibration alone causes motion across the surface. It's not levitation, but it is movement generated purely through...

randallwcarlson's profile picture

Randall Carlson

169,534 subscribers

14,160 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

The question Ashton Forbes is working through is one that connects modern physics to one of the oldest unsolved problems in archaeology - how did ancient civilizations move stones of extraordinary mass with no evidence of the mechanical infrastructure that would make it possible today. The proposition he is exploring is that sound may be the answer. If physical reality is fundamentally wave-based, then sound - itself a wave phenomenon - could theoretically produce effects that resemble gravitational influence under the right conditions of frequency and resonance. The observation that stays with Randall is a simple and domestic one. An electric shaver set down on a countertop while still running began to move on its own - vibration translating directly into physical displacement across a flat surface. He noted it at the time and filed it away. Could vibrations move objects? Under the right circumstances, the answer appeared to be yes. Randall connects that observation to his broader research into resonance physics and ancient construction - arguing that a civilization without modern material manufacturing could still have identified and applied the principles of acoustic resonance to achieve effects that brute force and conventional tooling cannot replicate. The technology would have left no physical trace. Only the results would remain - and those results, Randall suggests, are exactly what we are still staring at in disbelief at sites around the world.
0:58

The question Ashton Forbes is working through is one that connects modern physics to one of the oldest unsolved problems in archaeology - how did ancient civilizations move stones of extraordinary mass with no evidence of the mechanical infrastructure that would make it possible today. The proposition he is exploring is that sound may be the answer. If physical reality is fundamentally wave-based, then sound - itself a wave phenomenon - could theoretically produce effects that resemble gravitational influence under the right conditions of frequency and resonance. The observation that stays with Randall is a simple and domestic one. An electric shaver set down on a countertop while still running began to move on its own - vibration translating directly into physical displacement across a flat surface. He noted it at the time and filed it away. Could vibrations move objects? Under the right circumstances, the answer appeared to be yes. Randall connects that observation to his broader research into resonance physics and ancient construction - arguing that a civilization without modern material manufacturing could still have identified and applied the principles of acoustic resonance to achieve effects that brute force and conventional tooling cannot replicate. The technology would have left no physical trace. Only the results would remain - and those results, Randall suggests, are exactly what we are still staring at in disbelief at sites around the world.

Randall Carlson

24,461 次观看 • 3 个月前

This man has a Bluetooth vibration plate that you stand on He wakes up in the middle of the night and people are talking on it, you can actually hear the conversation 2 people are clearly speaking through his vibration plate From what I can find on Reddit, there are a lot of other people that have had this happen to them too Apparently the device has a built-in speaker that doubles as a Bluetooth audio receiver and speaker, and it can connect to nearby phones even if your own Bluetooth is off So it’s essentially picking up someone else’s signal and playing it through your vibration plate
2:26

This man has a Bluetooth vibration plate that you stand on He wakes up in the middle of the night and people are talking on it, you can actually hear the conversation 2 people are clearly speaking through his vibration plate From what I can find on Reddit, there are a lot of other people that have had this happen to them too Apparently the device has a built-in speaker that doubles as a Bluetooth audio receiver and speaker, and it can connect to nearby phones even if your own Bluetooth is off So it’s essentially picking up someone else’s signal and playing it through your vibration plate

Wall Street Apes

1,107,976 次观看 • 4 天前

What Cymatics Reveals About the Structure of Reality Do you think the universe is random, or does it follow principles that remain largely invisible to us? Cymatics offers a fascinating way to explore that question. By making sound and vibration visible, it demonstrates how frequency can organize matter into geometric patterns of remarkable complexity. When sound waves pass through water, sand, or other materials, order emerges from movement, producing forms that often resemble patterns found throughout nature. The implications extend beyond the experiment itself. Cymatics reveals that vibration is capable of shaping matter into organized structures through precise relationships governed by frequency. As the frequency changes, the geometry changes with it, suggesting a direct connection between energy and form. This raises a deeper question about the nature of the cosmos. If vibration can generate geometry in a laboratory, what role might vibration play in the formation of larger structures throughout nature and the universe? Similar patterns appear in crystals, flowers, biological systems, and even large scale cosmic formations. The repetition of geometry across vastly different scales points toward organizing principles that may operate throughout reality. The deeper one investigates mathematics, sound, geometry, and nature, the more they appear interconnected. Cymatics offers a glimpse into a universe where form emerges from frequency and where structure may arise from relationships embedded within the fabric of existence itself. Perhaps what we call reality is, in part, the visible expression of patterns generated by processes that begin beyond the limits of ordinary perception. ✨🙌🏾💫 © Robert Edward Grant
0:22

What Cymatics Reveals About the Structure of Reality Do you think the universe is random, or does it follow principles that remain largely invisible to us? Cymatics offers a fascinating way to explore that question. By making sound and vibration visible, it demonstrates how frequency can organize matter into geometric patterns of remarkable complexity. When sound waves pass through water, sand, or other materials, order emerges from movement, producing forms that often resemble patterns found throughout nature. The implications extend beyond the experiment itself. Cymatics reveals that vibration is capable of shaping matter into organized structures through precise relationships governed by frequency. As the frequency changes, the geometry changes with it, suggesting a direct connection between energy and form. This raises a deeper question about the nature of the cosmos. If vibration can generate geometry in a laboratory, what role might vibration play in the formation of larger structures throughout nature and the universe? Similar patterns appear in crystals, flowers, biological systems, and even large scale cosmic formations. The repetition of geometry across vastly different scales points toward organizing principles that may operate throughout reality. The deeper one investigates mathematics, sound, geometry, and nature, the more they appear interconnected. Cymatics offers a glimpse into a universe where form emerges from frequency and where structure may arise from relationships embedded within the fabric of existence itself. Perhaps what we call reality is, in part, the visible expression of patterns generated by processes that begin beyond the limits of ordinary perception. ✨🙌🏾💫 © Robert Edward Grant

🧬Maxpein🧬

12,849 次观看 • 23 天前

🚨 THE 528 Hz FREQUENCY: THE SECRET THE ANCIENTS KNEW AND THAT WAS HIDDEN FROM US 😱 Watch this video. A woman sings with a crystal singing bowl tuned to 528 Hz, known as the “Miracle Frequency.” What the Solfeggio frequencies really claim: 528 Hz is one of the 6 ancient sacred frequencies. It is said to repair DNA, promote healing, and awaken love. The other frequencies (396, 417, 639, 741, and 852 Hz) are believed to work on emotions, energetic blockages, and higher states of consciousness. The disturbing hypothesis: The modern musical scale (Do, Re, Mi…) was changed over time. The original Solfeggio frequencies — once used in Gregorian chants and ancient temples — are said to have been suppressed or deliberately altered. Why? Because these frequencies are believed to act directly on the body, DNA, and human consciousness. If 528 Hz can truly “repair,” then the question is no longer “Does it work?”… but rather: Why was this knowledge taken from us? Question: What if the music we listen to every day was intentionally detuned… to stop us from vibrating at our true frequency?
1:31

🚨 THE 528 Hz FREQUENCY: THE SECRET THE ANCIENTS KNEW AND THAT WAS HIDDEN FROM US 😱 Watch this video. A woman sings with a crystal singing bowl tuned to 528 Hz, known as the “Miracle Frequency.” What the Solfeggio frequencies really claim: 528 Hz is one of the 6 ancient sacred frequencies. It is said to repair DNA, promote healing, and awaken love. The other frequencies (396, 417, 639, 741, and 852 Hz) are believed to work on emotions, energetic blockages, and higher states of consciousness. The disturbing hypothesis: The modern musical scale (Do, Re, Mi…) was changed over time. The original Solfeggio frequencies — once used in Gregorian chants and ancient temples — are said to have been suppressed or deliberately altered. Why? Because these frequencies are believed to act directly on the body, DNA, and human consciousness. If 528 Hz can truly “repair,” then the question is no longer “Does it work?”… but rather: Why was this knowledge taken from us? Question: What if the music we listen to every day was intentionally detuned… to stop us from vibrating at our true frequency?

Paul White Gold Eagle

25,112 次观看 • 20 天前

🇺🇦🇷🇺Zelensky wants Russia to withdraw its troops to the February 2022 line and fire that he wants western support. So, if he gets the west to support him, this will be his demand. “Negotiations can be fair and unfair. It can be different. The question is who Ukraine will be with at that time. If it is not alone, then Ukraine will do everything to ensure that the negotiations are fair. And fair means guarantees that the enemy will return, at a minimum, to the line of full-scale invasion. And this would be a fair opportunity to start a dialogue. But it can be different. That's how it happens in life.”
0:41

🇺🇦🇷🇺Zelensky wants Russia to withdraw its troops to the February 2022 line and fire that he wants western support. So, if he gets the west to support him, this will be his demand. “Negotiations can be fair and unfair. It can be different. The question is who Ukraine will be with at that time. If it is not alone, then Ukraine will do everything to ensure that the negotiations are fair. And fair means guarantees that the enemy will return, at a minimum, to the line of full-scale invasion. And this would be a fair opportunity to start a dialogue. But it can be different. That's how it happens in life.”

Lord Bebo

114,711 次观看 • 1 年前

Hasan calls out Fox News for hiring reporters to cover him and implies the company is scared to go off about the collar in fear of being sued Also continues to imply that it was always a vibration collar "They can't even f'in say it too bc they're worried about getting sued..Fox News is trying to entertain it but they can't fully say it..they can only point to it" "That's insane, this is a Fox News Sunday program!..I have literal f'in stalkers on the payroll dude" "Ur own stalker operation literally destroyed the f'in meta..not only did it prove that it's a f'in vibration collar but it also proved that she goes on long walks throughout the day"
2:25

Hasan calls out Fox News for hiring reporters to cover him and implies the company is scared to go off about the collar in fear of being sued Also continues to imply that it was always a vibration collar "They can't even f'in say it too bc they're worried about getting sued..Fox News is trying to entertain it but they can't fully say it..they can only point to it" "That's insane, this is a Fox News Sunday program!..I have literal f'in stalkers on the payroll dude" "Ur own stalker operation literally destroyed the f'in meta..not only did it prove that it's a f'in vibration collar but it also proved that she goes on long walks throughout the day"

yeet

36,114 次观看 • 1 个月前

Ilya Sutskever, OpenAI co-founder, on why the company that builds AGI shouldn't be chasing infinite profits: Speaking on the No Priors podcast, Ilya Sutskever turns a question on the very technology he's working to build. "If you believe that the technology that we are building, AGI, could potentially be so capable as to do every single task that people do... does it mean that it might unemploy everyone? Well, I don't know, but it's not impossible." From that possibility, Ilya Sutskever draws a conclusion about how such a company should be structured: "And if that's the case, it makes sense. It will make a lot of sense if the company that builds such a technology would not be incentivized to make infinite profits." But he doesn't present this as a settled view. He immediately points to the force that complicates it — competition: "I don't know if it will literally play out this way because of competition in AI. So there will be multiple companies and I think that will have some unforeseen implications on the argument which I'm making. But that was the thinking." His point is simple: if AGI can do everything a person can, it might put people out of work on a massive scale, and that changes things.
0:40

Ilya Sutskever, OpenAI co-founder, on why the company that builds AGI shouldn't be chasing infinite profits: Speaking on the No Priors podcast, Ilya Sutskever turns a question on the very technology he's working to build. "If you believe that the technology that we are building, AGI, could potentially be so capable as to do every single task that people do... does it mean that it might unemploy everyone? Well, I don't know, but it's not impossible." From that possibility, Ilya Sutskever draws a conclusion about how such a company should be structured: "And if that's the case, it makes sense. It will make a lot of sense if the company that builds such a technology would not be incentivized to make infinite profits." But he doesn't present this as a settled view. He immediately points to the force that complicates it — competition: "I don't know if it will literally play out this way because of competition in AI. So there will be multiple companies and I think that will have some unforeseen implications on the argument which I'm making. But that was the thinking." His point is simple: if AGI can do everything a person can, it might put people out of work on a massive scale, and that changes things.

Big Brain AI

13,398 次观看 • 1 个月前

Queer theorist Judith Butler attempts a response to Matt Walsh's "What Is a Woman?" and it's just "You're angry and you hate Socrates" "I can't help noting that the people who pound the table like, 'It's a simple fact, we should have a simple answer.' They're angry. They're insistent. They're frustrated. I mean, just look at what the emotional aura is of that claim. 'We need a simple truth.' And like, whoa, why are we so angry about that?" "I ask the same question. What is a woman? Freud asked the question: what does a woman want? But you could also say, what is a woman? My own sensibilities say it's a great question, but it's wondrous. It's wonderful. Let's keep that question open, because you know what? There are going to be a lot of different ways of answering and will give us access to human complexity. And then we'll know more about the world and we'll be able to affirm the human in its complexity rather than putting it into fixed boxes and smashing in those nails. So for me, 'What is a woman' is a great question, but I would just keep it open." "This is a movement that seeks to control knowledge, to suppress knowledge, to stop us from questioning -- even to attack Socrates, who taught us the absolute importance of open inquiry." "The anti-gender ideology movement is an attack on knowledge and an attack on open inquiry."
4:35

Queer theorist Judith Butler attempts a response to Matt Walsh's "What Is a Woman?" and it's just "You're angry and you hate Socrates" "I can't help noting that the people who pound the table like, 'It's a simple fact, we should have a simple answer.' They're angry. They're insistent. They're frustrated. I mean, just look at what the emotional aura is of that claim. 'We need a simple truth.' And like, whoa, why are we so angry about that?" "I ask the same question. What is a woman? Freud asked the question: what does a woman want? But you could also say, what is a woman? My own sensibilities say it's a great question, but it's wondrous. It's wonderful. Let's keep that question open, because you know what? There are going to be a lot of different ways of answering and will give us access to human complexity. And then we'll know more about the world and we'll be able to affirm the human in its complexity rather than putting it into fixed boxes and smashing in those nails. So for me, 'What is a woman' is a great question, but I would just keep it open." "This is a movement that seeks to control knowledge, to suppress knowledge, to stop us from questioning -- even to attack Socrates, who taught us the absolute importance of open inquiry." "The anti-gender ideology movement is an attack on knowledge and an attack on open inquiry."

Breitbart News

221,121 次观看 • 22 天前

OK, now it gets really interesting because these UFOs appear to move like a saucer skipping across water, or like when you throw a smooth stone and it skips along the surface. Why is this important? Because one of the earliest pilot reports of a UFO came from Kenneth Arnold, and he described them moving in exactly this way. When Kenneth Arnold described the objects he saw on June 24, 1947, he said they moved: "like a saucer if you skip it across water." Just look at how the four UAPs are moving at the start, almost as if they are swimming underwater. This video lasts eight minutes. You can find it on page 12; it's the first one.
0:35

OK, now it gets really interesting because these UFOs appear to move like a saucer skipping across water, or like when you throw a smooth stone and it skips along the surface. Why is this important? Because one of the earliest pilot reports of a UFO came from Kenneth Arnold, and he described them moving in exactly this way. When Kenneth Arnold described the objects he saw on June 24, 1947, he said they moved: "like a saucer if you skip it across water." Just look at how the four UAPs are moving at the start, almost as if they are swimming underwater. This video lasts eight minutes. You can find it on page 12; it's the first one.

Open Minded Approach

1,940,967 次观看 • 1 个月前

This is the latest Google research on XR Interaction: World Mouse. Instead of using hand rays or gestures to point at things in the physical space, you move a cursor with a mouse and the system figures out where that cursor should sit in the 3D world. It works in two main ways: - On an object, the cursor follows the surface, so you can move precisely across walls, screens, furniture, or virtual objects. - Between objects, the system creates a smooth bridge through space, so the cursor can travel from one surface to another. That means you can go from a 2D panel to a 3D object, place content on a real wall, manipulate virtual objects, or interact with physical devices through digital proxies. This is the type of news, tools and product updates I share weekly in my newsletter. If you are into 3D XR and AI make sure to check it out (link on top of my profile). Based on “World Mouse: Exploring Interactions with a Cross-Reality Cursor” by Esen K. Tütüncü, Mar Gonzalez-Franco, Khushman Patel, and Eric J. Gonzalez
0:42

This is the latest Google research on XR Interaction: World Mouse. Instead of using hand rays or gestures to point at things in the physical space, you move a cursor with a mouse and the system figures out where that cursor should sit in the 3D world. It works in two main ways: - On an object, the cursor follows the surface, so you can move precisely across walls, screens, furniture, or virtual objects. - Between objects, the system creates a smooth bridge through space, so the cursor can travel from one surface to another. That means you can go from a 2D panel to a 3D object, place content on a real wall, manipulate virtual objects, or interact with physical devices through digital proxies. This is the type of news, tools and product updates I share weekly in my newsletter. If you are into 3D XR and AI make sure to check it out (link on top of my profile). Based on “World Mouse: Exploring Interactions with a Cross-Reality Cursor” by Esen K. Tütüncü, Mar Gonzalez-Franco, Khushman Patel, and Eric J. Gonzalez

Gabriele Romagnoli

28,945 次观看 • 3 个月前

On a previous #TeawithGaryVee I was asked "You've just turned 50. I'm about to turn 37. What would be the advice you would have given yourself 13 years ago in retrospect at that age?" if you have a question for me, drop it here so my team can add it to the next Rapid Fire Q&A and follow me on
5:40

On a previous #TeawithGaryVee I was asked "You've just turned 50. I'm about to turn 37. What would be the advice you would have given yourself 13 years ago in retrospect at that age?" if you have a question for me, drop it here so my team can add it to the next Rapid Fire Q&A and follow me on

Gary Vaynerchuk

14,182 次观看 • 2 个月前

The water erosion visible on the Sphinx is not a minor detail or a contested footnote. It is a geological clock - and Randall reads it directly. The last time significant rainfall occurred in the region of the Giza Plateau was approximately 10,000 years ago. If the erosion pattern on the Sphinx was produced by water rather than wind and sand, as the evidence strongly suggests, then the structure has to be at least that old. Randall states he is 100% on board with that minimum date. The emphasis, however, is on the word minimum. Randall’s position is that the Sphinx is much, much older than 10,000 years - placing it potentially in the same company as the most ancient megalithic remains he has encountered in his exploration, including the extraordinary stonework at Baalbek. The rainfall record gives a floor. The geology, the construction style, and the broader context of what Randall has been finding across multiple ancient sites suggest the ceiling is considerably higher than mainstream archaeology has ever been willing to acknowledge. The Sphinx was not built at the dawn of Egyptian civilization. It may have been ancient even to the ancient Egyptians.
0:38

The water erosion visible on the Sphinx is not a minor detail or a contested footnote. It is a geological clock - and Randall reads it directly. The last time significant rainfall occurred in the region of the Giza Plateau was approximately 10,000 years ago. If the erosion pattern on the Sphinx was produced by water rather than wind and sand, as the evidence strongly suggests, then the structure has to be at least that old. Randall states he is 100% on board with that minimum date. The emphasis, however, is on the word minimum. Randall’s position is that the Sphinx is much, much older than 10,000 years - placing it potentially in the same company as the most ancient megalithic remains he has encountered in his exploration, including the extraordinary stonework at Baalbek. The rainfall record gives a floor. The geology, the construction style, and the broader context of what Randall has been finding across multiple ancient sites suggest the ceiling is considerably higher than mainstream archaeology has ever been willing to acknowledge. The Sphinx was not built at the dawn of Egyptian civilization. It may have been ancient even to the ancient Egyptians.

Randall Carlson

18,513 次观看 • 2 个月前

Seeing a woman's hair move from the music inside a car is a pretty striking demonstration of physics in action. When a sound system produces powerful low-frequency waves, it's not just your ears that notice, the vibrations can be strong enough to shake objects, rattle panels, and even make hair visibly move. What I find fascinating is that music is really energy traveling through the air. The louder and more powerful the sound waves, the greater their effect on the environment around them. Moments like this make it easy to see that sound isn't just something we hear. it's something we can sometimes physically feel.
0:52

Seeing a woman's hair move from the music inside a car is a pretty striking demonstration of physics in action. When a sound system produces powerful low-frequency waves, it's not just your ears that notice, the vibrations can be strong enough to shake objects, rattle panels, and even make hair visibly move. What I find fascinating is that music is really energy traveling through the air. The louder and more powerful the sound waves, the greater their effect on the environment around them. Moments like this make it easy to see that sound isn't just something we hear. it's something we can sometimes physically feel.

Dr. CZ

29,099 次观看 • 1 个月前

The question Randall keeps returning to is deceptively simple. Why? What is the motive for quarrying and assembling 20 ton stones into monumental structures? In a world where virtually all of humanity was either farming or nomadically hunting and gathering, megalithic construction is not a natural cultural priority. Survival is. Feeding people is. Moving with the seasons is. Dragging enormous blocks of stone across landscapes and assembling them with precision is not something subsistence cultures do as a hobby. The eccentric outlier argument - that some culture simply became obsessed with large rocks and decided to demonstrate it - doesn't hold up under scrutiny. Outliers exist at the margins. What we find instead is megalithic construction appearing across multiple continents, in multiple periods, at a scale and level of precision that demands organisation, intention, and knowledge far beyond what the standard historical narrative assigns to these peoples. The motive question isn't a footnote. It is the whole conversation.
1:02

The question Randall keeps returning to is deceptively simple. Why? What is the motive for quarrying and assembling 20 ton stones into monumental structures? In a world where virtually all of humanity was either farming or nomadically hunting and gathering, megalithic construction is not a natural cultural priority. Survival is. Feeding people is. Moving with the seasons is. Dragging enormous blocks of stone across landscapes and assembling them with precision is not something subsistence cultures do as a hobby. The eccentric outlier argument - that some culture simply became obsessed with large rocks and decided to demonstrate it - doesn't hold up under scrutiny. Outliers exist at the margins. What we find instead is megalithic construction appearing across multiple continents, in multiple periods, at a scale and level of precision that demands organisation, intention, and knowledge far beyond what the standard historical narrative assigns to these peoples. The motive question isn't a footnote. It is the whole conversation.

Randall Carlson

116,617 次观看 • 4 个月前

If you take a movement to unpack this visualization... You'll see how it simply breaks down how reality works. At frame 0 you have a static image. Everything is one, this is the monad. As soon as you hit frame 1 there is movement, there is change. Now you have two states, moving, or static. When Nikola Tesla says you can explain everything in frequency and vibration. The difference between frame 0 and 1, is vibration. The difference between movement and no movement. This is like binary logic we use in code which is made up of 0's and 1's. After frame 1, is when frequency emerges. Because the difference between frame 1 and all frames after is about how fast is the vibration/movement happening. If we skip forward to frame 50... You have a shape that begins to emerge, this is the 8 dots, then the 6 dots. Notice how unstable it is, it's 8 dots, then 6, then a moment with 4 in a rectangle These shapes are emergent properties. The first two emergent properties after the monad was vibration and frequency. Next comes shape (i'm skipping over rotation and direction). These shapes of dots can only exist when you have frequency and rotation. This frequency and rotation creates vortex energy. It's the same energy that things like your chakras use. Or the same energy we harness in devices like engines, airplanes, fans, blenders, hard drives, etc. It's also the same vortex energy you'll see in a tornado or hurricane. They are powered because they harness rotation and frequency(change/movement). Going back to the video, notice that it is inside the entire shape, the internal structure is manifesting before the external structure does. Then around frame 60 the hexagon of circles begins to rotate. First it was the two dots that moved and now it's a complex shape that is coming to life. This is a higher dimension (or lower depending on how you look at it) manifesting into existence. The internal state is "awakening" and experiencing it's own change like what happened to the whole shape in the first frames. But it is unstable. That's why it doesn't persist for long. If you think of the 8 dots being the octahedron, they map to the element of air. Air is in the material world, but it is not something you can see. The brief moments the 8 dots are visible is similar to that effect. They are only experienceable between a small frequency band of frames. Now here's where stability begins to appear in the internal structure. This is when the 4 dots appear. You'll see that the four dots, the square, is stable and persists the most visibly for the most amount of frames. The square represents earth in the platonic solids to elements mapping. Earth, is material, it's stable. We build our buildings in squares and with earth because it is a solid shape to build on. This visualization shows you why. Across different vibrations (frame rates) it can self sustain. Between this point and frame 180, you'll see a new emergent property. Which is depth. A new dimension is introduced at around frame 90 but really becomes visible at around frame 110. You can see a foreground and background. There is the shape of the dots, but also the triskellion wave happening in the background. Let's jump to frame 180. Notice how it is the same as frame 0 except... It's flashing. If you were paying attention, you'll notice you could see flashing at frame 90 and frame 120, but they didn't persist for long. At around 150 it started to reach stability and 180 it was solidified. Between frames 150 and 180 there is flashing, but the image is still moving. Only for a brief moment at frame 180 is the movement frozen and the flashing persists. Think of that like your computer screen. It's what your screen is doing right now as you read this. Even tho the text isn't moving, the screen is flashing at 60 or 120hz. The images appear on your device because this flashing brings things to life. The entire material realm and your physical body right now, is doing the same thing. While you look solid... You're flashing in and out of existence at very high frequencies. You can look at frame 180 and frame 0 as the same essence but it is the mid point between an octave change. In the video, the ying and yang was vertical, now it is horizontal. This is a phase shift. If you notice at exactly frame 180, the rotation freezes and then the direction of rotation changes. The process then repeats all the way to frame 360 but in the opposite sequence. Once it reaches frame 360, that is an octave change and the process repeats. Each time you repeat the process is a layering of the same patterns into higher octaves. This is the same as your chakras or how other things work. They are like russian nesting dolls where every octave is layering onto the next. The complexity of your body is a layering of basic principles that emerged in earlier stages. Your organs are built of systems that are built with cells that are built with proteins that are built with atoms and so on. The atoms, work just like your body at a basic level. Your body works just like the galaxies. At each level you'll have the same pattern. This is where the idea "As Above, So Below" from. The monad, splits in two, and so on and so on. One cell, splits into two through mitosis in the same logic. We could spend all day going through examples of how biology, physics, spirituality, etc. aren't really different. They are just categories that we use to dissect these frequencies and octaves of energy but they only start paying attention within the confines of materialism. The problem is, none of the sciences start at the root patterns. Because that is reserved for religion or spirituality. It's too woo-woo to take seriously so it's dismissed. And because of that... We're left ignorant on the simple explanations for how things work. Now you need some expert with tools you don't have access to in order to explain things. When you could be understanding them without the tools. The Yin and Yang symbol in this video is 3,000 years old. It's simple. Yet I just showed you how it explains deeper layers of reality.
1:59

If you take a movement to unpack this visualization... You'll see how it simply breaks down how reality works. At frame 0 you have a static image. Everything is one, this is the monad. As soon as you hit frame 1 there is movement, there is change. Now you have two states, moving, or static. When Nikola Tesla says you can explain everything in frequency and vibration. The difference between frame 0 and 1, is vibration. The difference between movement and no movement. This is like binary logic we use in code which is made up of 0's and 1's. After frame 1, is when frequency emerges. Because the difference between frame 1 and all frames after is about how fast is the vibration/movement happening. If we skip forward to frame 50... You have a shape that begins to emerge, this is the 8 dots, then the 6 dots. Notice how unstable it is, it's 8 dots, then 6, then a moment with 4 in a rectangle These shapes are emergent properties. The first two emergent properties after the monad was vibration and frequency. Next comes shape (i'm skipping over rotation and direction). These shapes of dots can only exist when you have frequency and rotation. This frequency and rotation creates vortex energy. It's the same energy that things like your chakras use. Or the same energy we harness in devices like engines, airplanes, fans, blenders, hard drives, etc. It's also the same vortex energy you'll see in a tornado or hurricane. They are powered because they harness rotation and frequency(change/movement). Going back to the video, notice that it is inside the entire shape, the internal structure is manifesting before the external structure does. Then around frame 60 the hexagon of circles begins to rotate. First it was the two dots that moved and now it's a complex shape that is coming to life. This is a higher dimension (or lower depending on how you look at it) manifesting into existence. The internal state is "awakening" and experiencing it's own change like what happened to the whole shape in the first frames. But it is unstable. That's why it doesn't persist for long. If you think of the 8 dots being the octahedron, they map to the element of air. Air is in the material world, but it is not something you can see. The brief moments the 8 dots are visible is similar to that effect. They are only experienceable between a small frequency band of frames. Now here's where stability begins to appear in the internal structure. This is when the 4 dots appear. You'll see that the four dots, the square, is stable and persists the most visibly for the most amount of frames. The square represents earth in the platonic solids to elements mapping. Earth, is material, it's stable. We build our buildings in squares and with earth because it is a solid shape to build on. This visualization shows you why. Across different vibrations (frame rates) it can self sustain. Between this point and frame 180, you'll see a new emergent property. Which is depth. A new dimension is introduced at around frame 90 but really becomes visible at around frame 110. You can see a foreground and background. There is the shape of the dots, but also the triskellion wave happening in the background. Let's jump to frame 180. Notice how it is the same as frame 0 except... It's flashing. If you were paying attention, you'll notice you could see flashing at frame 90 and frame 120, but they didn't persist for long. At around 150 it started to reach stability and 180 it was solidified. Between frames 150 and 180 there is flashing, but the image is still moving. Only for a brief moment at frame 180 is the movement frozen and the flashing persists. Think of that like your computer screen. It's what your screen is doing right now as you read this. Even tho the text isn't moving, the screen is flashing at 60 or 120hz. The images appear on your device because this flashing brings things to life. The entire material realm and your physical body right now, is doing the same thing. While you look solid... You're flashing in and out of existence at very high frequencies. You can look at frame 180 and frame 0 as the same essence but it is the mid point between an octave change. In the video, the ying and yang was vertical, now it is horizontal. This is a phase shift. If you notice at exactly frame 180, the rotation freezes and then the direction of rotation changes. The process then repeats all the way to frame 360 but in the opposite sequence. Once it reaches frame 360, that is an octave change and the process repeats. Each time you repeat the process is a layering of the same patterns into higher octaves. This is the same as your chakras or how other things work. They are like russian nesting dolls where every octave is layering onto the next. The complexity of your body is a layering of basic principles that emerged in earlier stages. Your organs are built of systems that are built with cells that are built with proteins that are built with atoms and so on. The atoms, work just like your body at a basic level. Your body works just like the galaxies. At each level you'll have the same pattern. This is where the idea "As Above, So Below" from. The monad, splits in two, and so on and so on. One cell, splits into two through mitosis in the same logic. We could spend all day going through examples of how biology, physics, spirituality, etc. aren't really different. They are just categories that we use to dissect these frequencies and octaves of energy but they only start paying attention within the confines of materialism. The problem is, none of the sciences start at the root patterns. Because that is reserved for religion or spirituality. It's too woo-woo to take seriously so it's dismissed. And because of that... We're left ignorant on the simple explanations for how things work. Now you need some expert with tools you don't have access to in order to explain things. When you could be understanding them without the tools. The Yin and Yang symbol in this video is 3,000 years old. It's simple. Yet I just showed you how it explains deeper layers of reality.

Jamal ☯︎ 🔆🧘🏽🧠

13,149 次观看 • 3 个月前

First day of summer. A 14-year-old just wants to fish. His line snags on a fence the neighbor stretched straight across the river, so he hops in a little boat to free it. Before he can untangle anything, the neighbor storms out yelling, “Don’t touch my fence!” Now it’s not about fishing. It’s about who thinks they own the water. Rivers usually aren’t private the way backyards are. And putting a barrier across one can be more than rude — it can be unsafe and, in many places, not allowed at all. The smartest move here isn’t arguing from a boat. It’s stepping back onto shore, getting an adult involved, and handling it calmly: a conversation first, and if that goes nowhere, a call to the local authorities or wildlife department to find out whether that fence even belongs there. Sometimes the best way to untangle a line… is to untangle the situation on land. What would you do? This is presented as a story; it may or may not be true; it may or may not be AI
1:55

First day of summer. A 14-year-old just wants to fish. His line snags on a fence the neighbor stretched straight across the river, so he hops in a little boat to free it. Before he can untangle anything, the neighbor storms out yelling, “Don’t touch my fence!” Now it’s not about fishing. It’s about who thinks they own the water. Rivers usually aren’t private the way backyards are. And putting a barrier across one can be more than rude — it can be unsafe and, in many places, not allowed at all. The smartest move here isn’t arguing from a boat. It’s stepping back onto shore, getting an adult involved, and handling it calmly: a conversation first, and if that goes nowhere, a call to the local authorities or wildlife department to find out whether that fence even belongs there. Sometimes the best way to untangle a line… is to untangle the situation on land. What would you do? This is presented as a story; it may or may not be true; it may or may not be AI

TheRealCherokeeOwl 🦉

2,046,994 次观看 • 5 个月前

The most interesting thing I've heard in a long time: Can AI ever be conscious? Ilya Sutskever Ilya Sutskever, co-founder at OpenAI, explained a simple experiment for AI consciousness. We carefully curate the data such that we never mention anything about consciousness...we would only give the AI controlled data about surface-level experiences and mundane objects. At some point, we would tell AI about the concept of consciousness. If the AI agrees and says it's been experiencing the same thing or recognizes the experience, then it would be convincing. Do you think AI can be conscious? If, so what is a good test for it? Is something like John Searle's Chinese Room argument sufficient?
2:41

The most interesting thing I've heard in a long time: Can AI ever be conscious? Ilya Sutskever Ilya Sutskever, co-founder at OpenAI, explained a simple experiment for AI consciousness. We carefully curate the data such that we never mention anything about consciousness...we would only give the AI controlled data about surface-level experiences and mundane objects. At some point, we would tell AI about the concept of consciousness. If the AI agrees and says it's been experiencing the same thing or recognizes the experience, then it would be convincing. Do you think AI can be conscious? If, so what is a good test for it? Is something like John Searle's Chinese Room argument sufficient?

Alex Ker 🔭

472,703 次观看 • 2 年前

Seriously, can we please talk about Offroad’s acting here? You could clearly see everything Pheem was feeling and thinking through his facial expressions. He went from slowly recognizing Than’s moves, to thinking that Than might be the boy from his childhood, to rejecting that idea because he thought it might have been a common move from the television. THE WICKED GAME EP3 #เกมรักลวงEP3
0:26

Seriously, can we please talk about Offroad’s acting here? You could clearly see everything Pheem was feeling and thinking through his facial expressions. He went from slowly recognizing Than’s moves, to thinking that Than might be the boy from his childhood, to rejecting that idea because he thought it might have been a common move from the television. THE WICKED GAME EP3 #เกมรักลวงEP3

𝐟𝐢𝐥𝐦.

23,450 次观看 • 9 个月前