Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Hearts Equaliser Tavernier or Olsen? Seen many comments debating whether its James Tavernier or Skov Olsen responsible but I'd rather solve the issues at source: > Defender Allowing Winger Inside the Box & Backing Off > Lack Of Communication for Overlap > Nobody Taking Responsibility for the Danger Overlapping...

32,763 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

"If there's no tough news you're probably doing something unimportant." Sequoia Capital Partner Konstantine Buhler (Konstantine Buhler) on why honesty & integrity are the first, non-negotiable, principles of investing: "For investing, the first principle is honesty and integrity without question. Working with people who are honest, say things the way they are, have clear communication with me, and genuine trust — that's non-negotiable, and high integrity on all these things. I'd always rather know bad news honestly than the opposite. And frankly, that's the kind of relationship that I have with my founders, and I'm really grateful for. And partly that's because when there is tough news, which by the way if you do something important there's gonna be a lot of tough news always, if there's no tough news you're probably doing something unimportant. So when there is tough news, the response is level-headed." "Or you're lying." "Yeah, or you're lying, exactly. And when there is tough news, the way that these relationships actually grow is by responding with ability. You know, taking responsibility and responding with ability and saying, "Okay, this is what we can do. This is how we can help you. This is how we can put this on track." Or just listening and solving it together. So the first two are always honesty & integrity. And then the next is, I'm looking for a spike in the person — something that they're amazing at. I'm not looking for someone that checks every box. I'm looking for someone who's unbelievable in some particular area."

Molly O’Shea

20,978 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

How on earth did these ads get cleared by the Electoral Commission (EC) for being neutral? It seems no one there understands imagery bias and the concept of visual hierarchy. State broadcaster TVNZ and the EC are running highly targeted ads for Māori voters with the 'choose Māori or general roll' option. However, look at the framing. Empowering māori language such as “Breathe mana into your choice” and visuals that very clearly tie the Māori roll to core aspects of Māori identity, culture, connection to place, and a sense of empowerment. The ad subtly steers viewers, especially those of Māori descent - toward feeling that opting for the Māori roll is the natural, deeply meaningful choice. It frames it as a "mana-filled" expression of who they are, something authentic and right for their whānau and future. It’s soft guidance that lands emotionally without being overt. The opening scene - wharf - water = traditional land +sea connection. The marae kitchen scene - which has huge traditional pull with the voice overlay of “it’s not about right or wrong but what’s right for you” while the woman nods . The last scene is blatant - the voice overlay “shape the horizon ahead” with father and son fishing - fishing - passing on knowledge, legacy, cultural identity. What imagery does the general roll have to reinforce that option? None. There are zero equivalent scenes showing the general roll positively. There is no abstract or equal representations of both options, generic NZ or imagery like ballot boxes or diverse crowds etc. You simply cannot claim that these ads are neutral - the voice over yes, but the complete ad is not even close to neutral. TVNZ is using taxpayer money to promote ethnic electoral segregation while claiming 'neutral information’. At its core, it is motivational messaging that predictably boosts one roll. It beggars belief that hasn’t been flagged.

Suit and tie

17,342 görüntüleme • 28 gün önce

🚨Riyad Mahrez on the controversial Lionel Messi challenge against Aïssa Mandi during Argentina vs Algeria at the 2026 FIFA World Cup and Algeria’s shameful performance: 🗣️ “I know this won’t be a popular opinion, but for me, if that challenge is made by almost any other player in this tournament, we’re having a completely different conversation. If that is a defender wearing a different shirt, a midfielder from a smaller nation, or simply a player without Lionel Messi’s name on the back, I believe there is a serious chance a red card is shown. That is my honest view. The contact was significant. When you see a boot come up and catch an opponent like that, players have been sent off for similar incidents before. That is why so many people are debating it. What frustrates players is consistency. We are always told the rules are the same for everyone. But moments like this make people question whether that is really the case. Messi is one of the greatest players in football history. Nobody can deny that. He does not need special treatment. His football speaks for itself. That is why controversies like this become so big. Because people look at the incident and wonder if the decision would have been the same if another player had made the challenge. Of course, the referee and VAR saw it differently. They reviewed it and decided there was no red card. That decision is final. But do not be surprised that players, fans and pundits continue to argue about it. Because if football wants credibility, then consistency must be the same whether your name is Lionel Messi or anybody else. That is the debate people are having tonight.” {beIN SPORTS }

SethOfficial

1,338,181 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Climbing Annapurna: A Journey of Leadership Reflecting back, this avalanche was the exact reason for my decision NOT to take the normal route up Annapurna. Annapurna was the first mountain of the project Possible, and it wasn’t only this avalanche that presented hurdles. The long summit push in waist-deep snow, the rescues, and my team being in charge of fixing the lines all played a role. I realize how pivotal that moment was. As a leader, whether on the mountain or in life, I know every choice carries immense weight. One wrong decision could be catastrophic. During my career within the Gurkhas and UKSF/SBS, especially on operations, I learned that 100% commitment is essential, and I carry that mantra as a major principle in my life. After this avalanche, the next morning, I flew my drone to scout the mountain, using skills I developed in the special forces. With no filming crew or high-altitude cameras, it was just me and my determination. Choosing the Dutch Rib route, which had never been completed before, faced skepticism. Many said it was impossible, but I was driven by a greater purpose. We managed to push through, fixed the lines not only for our team but for the rest of the season's climbers, and reached the summit, proving that with dedication and hard work, the impossible can become reality. For me, leadership is about integrity and commitment. Every decision I make is for the team and the mission. After leading over 200 successful expeditions during and after my military career, I cannot emphasize the importance of always giving 100%. The lessons learned along the way are crucial for making it safe. As you all know, I’m a big fan of both summit and safety; they go hand in hand with my expeditions. My 52 successful ascents of 8000m peaks, while guiding and leading the team, speak volumes about the power of collaboration and shared goals. Here’s to embracing challenges and making every decision count 🙌🏽🙏🏽 #50plus8000msummits #MotivationalSpeaker #higgest8ksummitswithno02 #firstk2wintersummitnoo2 #nimsdai

Nirmal Purja MBE

16,916 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce