Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Here is a former ACLU leader explaining that exercising your Second Amendment rights should not limit your First Amendment rights. He made these statements amidst the debate over the carrying of weapons during the protest in Charlottesville. Sitting next to him is former ACLU Executive Director Ira Glasser, who...

NicoPerrino's profile picture

Nico Perrino

11,087 subscribers

26,688 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

ЮморНовости и политикаОбразование
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

ALERT: Supreme Court will consider whether bans on semiautomatic guns violate Second Amendment rights. The Supreme Court will hear from Connecticut and Cook County, Illinois, home to Chicago, groups on their bans on “assault weapons.” Cutberto Viramontes and Christopher Khaya have challenged the ban in Cook County along with Firearms Policy Coalition and the Second Amendment Foundation. The Connecticut Citizens Defense League, the Second Amendment Foundation, and 3 citizens have challenged the ban in Connecticut. Lower courts have upheld the laws that ban these “assault weapons” as groups argue they are in violation of their Second Amendment rights.
0:44

ALERT: Supreme Court will consider whether bans on semiautomatic guns violate Second Amendment rights. The Supreme Court will hear from Connecticut and Cook County, Illinois, home to Chicago, groups on their bans on “assault weapons.” Cutberto Viramontes and Christopher Khaya have challenged the ban in Cook County along with Firearms Policy Coalition and the Second Amendment Foundation. The Connecticut Citizens Defense League, the Second Amendment Foundation, and 3 citizens have challenged the ban in Connecticut. Lower courts have upheld the laws that ban these “assault weapons” as groups argue they are in violation of their Second Amendment rights.

E X X ➠A L E R T S

54,340 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Clarence Thomas explained the Second Amendment in one sentence. And every politician who talks about what gun rights they are willing to “let” you keep should hear it. The Second Amendment does not grant the right. It assumes the right already exists. That means the government does not give you the right to keep and bear arms. The amendment tells the government what it cannot do to a right you already had. Rights first. Government second. That is the order. And once you understand that, every gun law looks different. Because now the government is the one that has to explain itself. Not you. Then Thomas tells a story about Justice Breyer asking what he would do if a man with a machete walked up on his porch demanding money. Thomas’s answer? He would be cleaning his guns. That is why this clip hits different. He does not just rule on the Second Amendment. He understands it. He lives it. And he connects it to the history most gun control speeches leave out: The 14th Amendment. Freed slaves. The right to defend yourself from people trying to kill you. Because a citizen who cannot protect his own life does not stay a citizen for very long. Do you think most politicians understand the Second Amendment, or do they just talk around it? Shop the America Hat here:
2:26

Clarence Thomas explained the Second Amendment in one sentence. And every politician who talks about what gun rights they are willing to “let” you keep should hear it. The Second Amendment does not grant the right. It assumes the right already exists. That means the government does not give you the right to keep and bear arms. The amendment tells the government what it cannot do to a right you already had. Rights first. Government second. That is the order. And once you understand that, every gun law looks different. Because now the government is the one that has to explain itself. Not you. Then Thomas tells a story about Justice Breyer asking what he would do if a man with a machete walked up on his porch demanding money. Thomas’s answer? He would be cleaning his guns. That is why this clip hits different. He does not just rule on the Second Amendment. He understands it. He lives it. And he connects it to the history most gun control speeches leave out: The 14th Amendment. Freed slaves. The right to defend yourself from people trying to kill you. Because a citizen who cannot protect his own life does not stay a citizen for very long. Do you think most politicians understand the Second Amendment, or do they just talk around it? Shop the America Hat here:

Colion Noir

108,813 просмотров • 20 дней назад

Minnesota State Patrol directly violated the Fourth Amendment and the Minnesota Constitution Article 1 Section 10. He directed his dog to jump in the window. It didn't do it the first round, so he brought him back and started over, and you can see his hand gestures. This is the type of trash we have with badges in Minnesota. These people are not there to protect your rights they are there to violate your rights, and this is a fine example.
1:11

Minnesota State Patrol directly violated the Fourth Amendment and the Minnesota Constitution Article 1 Section 10. He directed his dog to jump in the window. It didn't do it the first round, so he brought him back and started over, and you can see his hand gestures. This is the type of trash we have with badges in Minnesota. These people are not there to protect your rights they are there to violate your rights, and this is a fine example.

All4Freedom🇺🇲🐸🍿

20,096 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Brad Raffensperger sent mail ballots to everyone in 2020 and he gave the ACLU access to the ENet statewide voter registration and election management computer system. They had an ACLU activist in all 255 precincts who had access to the system so they knew who voted, who didn’t vote, how they voted, and they had the ability to clear the system of who had an absentee ballot but voted in person. The ACLU activists had access to this system from their personal laptops. The ACLU is NOT a nonpartisan organization. They are a prominent member of Democracy Inc. who actively works against the Trump administration so for them to have this type of access to who voted or not is criminal. The ACLU’s involvement in the 2020 election must be part of the FBI’s investigation and the worthless republicans need to add wording to the SAVE Act that addresses partisan nonprofits involvement in our elections. Additionally, Fulton County commissioner Bridget Thorne verifies some of what Marilyn Marks said including that the recounts were fraudulent, that ballots were added, that ballot images were not uploaded, etc. People were prosecuted for trying to get to the truth of what happened in 2020, including Tina Peters who is rotting in prison.
5:19

Brad Raffensperger sent mail ballots to everyone in 2020 and he gave the ACLU access to the ENet statewide voter registration and election management computer system. They had an ACLU activist in all 255 precincts who had access to the system so they knew who voted, who didn’t vote, how they voted, and they had the ability to clear the system of who had an absentee ballot but voted in person. The ACLU activists had access to this system from their personal laptops. The ACLU is NOT a nonpartisan organization. They are a prominent member of Democracy Inc. who actively works against the Trump administration so for them to have this type of access to who voted or not is criminal. The ACLU’s involvement in the 2020 election must be part of the FBI’s investigation and the worthless republicans need to add wording to the SAVE Act that addresses partisan nonprofits involvement in our elections. Additionally, Fulton County commissioner Bridget Thorne verifies some of what Marilyn Marks said including that the recounts were fraudulent, that ballots were added, that ballot images were not uploaded, etc. People were prosecuted for trying to get to the truth of what happened in 2020, including Tina Peters who is rotting in prison.

The Researcher

81,100 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

A short video clip from a BBC documentary. Gerard Hodgins is a former IRA prisoner and was one of the hunger strikers back in 1981. Here he is asked about who won...
1:07

A short video clip from a BBC documentary. Gerard Hodgins is a former IRA prisoner and was one of the hunger strikers back in 1981. Here he is asked about who won...

Sage Despatches

37,728 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

When you learn the fundamental law it is important to get in front of your government servants in the presence of the people to teach both the people and your servants that the people have all the power , that your trustees are there to benefit the people , to tell them where they are falling in danger of maladministration, what the law is and how to correct it. It is in exercising your power and right that brings forth a paradigm shift like none you’ve seen before. Doing this flips your local state and federal government back to the people as the people learn and start joining you in speaking the law. It becomes no longer about complaining about the issues but using your power and authority as it is written to correct and bring the change necessary to secure our republic for yourself and for the common good of all. This is not only our right but our duty to teach our trustees what their job is. Many say they won’t listen or live in fear of what they may do, but as you can see here I spoke in front of police officers and our trustees and I was not detained or restrained from standing on my authority. I also was not called a sovereign citizen and the outcome of getting the people to stand with me in signing those notices and serving them made our county board do right by the people and not pass the mandate. There’s a reason Ben Franklin said “ a republic if you can keep it”. He was saying it’s on the people to maintain what they secured for you. The people need to show back up and run their nation the way our founders laid out in all 51 constitution they penned. Everyone is searching for remedy but most don’t look in the 50 state constitutions that expressly declared our power authority and rights. Your remedy is there, the only question is will you use it? If you want to learn how to stand learn from my teacher DavidJose who is the best in the nation and has given the people victory teach line by line precept upon precept. Let’s go get our nation back!
3:01

When you learn the fundamental law it is important to get in front of your government servants in the presence of the people to teach both the people and your servants that the people have all the power , that your trustees are there to benefit the people , to tell them where they are falling in danger of maladministration, what the law is and how to correct it. It is in exercising your power and right that brings forth a paradigm shift like none you’ve seen before. Doing this flips your local state and federal government back to the people as the people learn and start joining you in speaking the law. It becomes no longer about complaining about the issues but using your power and authority as it is written to correct and bring the change necessary to secure our republic for yourself and for the common good of all. This is not only our right but our duty to teach our trustees what their job is. Many say they won’t listen or live in fear of what they may do, but as you can see here I spoke in front of police officers and our trustees and I was not detained or restrained from standing on my authority. I also was not called a sovereign citizen and the outcome of getting the people to stand with me in signing those notices and serving them made our county board do right by the people and not pass the mandate. There’s a reason Ben Franklin said “ a republic if you can keep it”. He was saying it’s on the people to maintain what they secured for you. The people need to show back up and run their nation the way our founders laid out in all 51 constitution they penned. Everyone is searching for remedy but most don’t look in the 50 state constitutions that expressly declared our power authority and rights. Your remedy is there, the only question is will you use it? If you want to learn how to stand learn from my teacher DavidJose who is the best in the nation and has given the people victory teach line by line precept upon precept. Let’s go get our nation back!

Summer Cook

22,486 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Sending in militarized police and snipers to stop students from exercising their First Amendment rights is truly disgusting. Why are my colleagues and the mainstream media more outraged over these anti-war protests than they are about the over 35,000 Palestinians killed in Gaza?
5:09

Sending in militarized police and snipers to stop students from exercising their First Amendment rights is truly disgusting. Why are my colleagues and the mainstream media more outraged over these anti-war protests than they are about the over 35,000 Palestinians killed in Gaza?

Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib

1,027,295 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Fauci pleading the 5th is a perversion of the intended purpose of that amendment. Dave Smith: "The idea of the 5th Amendment is that if the government's trying to deprive you, a citizen, of your liberty, then you have certain rights before they can take your liberty away. And, one of those rights, is that you have the right to not incriminate yourself. "That's very different from saying a government employee has the right to not incriminate himself when being asked questions about depriving all of the American people of their basic rights. It's pretty obvious to see what a basic perversion that is."
2:30

Fauci pleading the 5th is a perversion of the intended purpose of that amendment. Dave Smith: "The idea of the 5th Amendment is that if the government's trying to deprive you, a citizen, of your liberty, then you have certain rights before they can take your liberty away. And, one of those rights, is that you have the right to not incriminate yourself. "That's very different from saying a government employee has the right to not incriminate himself when being asked questions about depriving all of the American people of their basic rights. It's pretty obvious to see what a basic perversion that is."

Captain Ⓐncapistan

69,347 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

He Got Pulled Over With Multiple Guns In The Car… Watch What Happens A young guy gets pulled over with three guns in the car. A rifle in the passenger seat. A handgun on him. A second handgun down by his legs. And the traffic stop still goes exactly how it should. The officer sees the rifle, stays calm, gives clear instructions, and tells him what he’s about to do before he does it. The driver announces what he’s reaching for, tells the officer he’s a concealed carrier, and answers clearly when asked where the other gun is. Two strangers. Three guns. No escalation. That is not luck. That is what happens when both sides understand the stakes and decide this does not have to become the other kind of video. In this video, I break down what this stop shows about armed citizens, police, disclosure, mutual respect, Philando Castile, and how I personally handle traffic stops when I’m carrying. Know your rights. Defend your rights. But be smart enough not to turn a disagreement into a war.
1:55

He Got Pulled Over With Multiple Guns In The Car… Watch What Happens A young guy gets pulled over with three guns in the car. A rifle in the passenger seat. A handgun on him. A second handgun down by his legs. And the traffic stop still goes exactly how it should. The officer sees the rifle, stays calm, gives clear instructions, and tells him what he’s about to do before he does it. The driver announces what he’s reaching for, tells the officer he’s a concealed carrier, and answers clearly when asked where the other gun is. Two strangers. Three guns. No escalation. That is not luck. That is what happens when both sides understand the stakes and decide this does not have to become the other kind of video. In this video, I break down what this stop shows about armed citizens, police, disclosure, mutual respect, Philando Castile, and how I personally handle traffic stops when I’m carrying. Know your rights. Defend your rights. But be smart enough not to turn a disagreement into a war.

Colion Noir

45,528 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Mike's conversation with Nacho's father destroys the myth of his moral code Mike can't settle that night. He drives to the upholstery shop and calls Manuel outside. He gives him the kindest version he has. Your son made mistakes, fell in with bad people, but he was never like them. He had a good heart. Don't worry about the Salamancas. Their day is coming Then he tries to say it in Spanish and stumbles. I'm sorry, my Spanish. J-Justicia. Justice Manuel doesn't take it. What you talk about is not justice, he says. What you talk of is revenge. It never ends. My boy is gone. Then, in Spanish, walking back inside: "You gangsters and your 'justice.' You're all the same." That's the whole thing collapsing. The code is what let Mike sleep. It's what made him different from Hector, from Gus, from the rest of them. And here's a man who actually has one, looking at him and seeing another gangster He couldn't even get the word out. Manuel handed it back to him He went there for absolution. He got a mirror
2:04

Mike's conversation with Nacho's father destroys the myth of his moral code Mike can't settle that night. He drives to the upholstery shop and calls Manuel outside. He gives him the kindest version he has. Your son made mistakes, fell in with bad people, but he was never like them. He had a good heart. Don't worry about the Salamancas. Their day is coming Then he tries to say it in Spanish and stumbles. I'm sorry, my Spanish. J-Justicia. Justice Manuel doesn't take it. What you talk about is not justice, he says. What you talk of is revenge. It never ends. My boy is gone. Then, in Spanish, walking back inside: "You gangsters and your 'justice.' You're all the same." That's the whole thing collapsing. The code is what let Mike sleep. It's what made him different from Hector, from Gus, from the rest of them. And here's a man who actually has one, looking at him and seeing another gangster He couldn't even get the word out. Manuel handed it back to him He went there for absolution. He got a mirror

best of better call saul

30,128 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

I am delighted that Mohsen Mahdawi has been released from detention. Expressing a political opinion about the war in Gaza is not a crime. In the United States of America, you should not be put in a jail cell for exercising your First Amendment rights.
0:53

I am delighted that Mohsen Mahdawi has been released from detention. Expressing a political opinion about the war in Gaza is not a crime. In the United States of America, you should not be put in a jail cell for exercising your First Amendment rights.

Sen. Bernie Sanders

154,836 просмотров • 1 год назад

Buttigieg: Some people say there’s nothing you can do about it unless you have a constitutional amendment. Well, guess what? If that’s true, we ought to have a constitutional amendment. Remember, that didn’t used to be considered impossible. We’ve had about 30 of them. Some of the things we take for granted as core to the Constitution—it’s right in there, the First Amendment, the Second Amendment—the word “amendment” means it wasn’t even in the original text. Amendments have always been a critically important part of how our Constitution is supposed to work. We just forgot about it. We amended our Constitution for prohibition. We changed our Constitution so you couldn’t have a beer. And then we thought that’s a bad idea, and we changed it back. Don’t tell me we can’t change the Constitution to get money out of politics.
1:55

Buttigieg: Some people say there’s nothing you can do about it unless you have a constitutional amendment. Well, guess what? If that’s true, we ought to have a constitutional amendment. Remember, that didn’t used to be considered impossible. We’ve had about 30 of them. Some of the things we take for granted as core to the Constitution—it’s right in there, the First Amendment, the Second Amendment—the word “amendment” means it wasn’t even in the original text. Amendments have always been a critically important part of how our Constitution is supposed to work. We just forgot about it. We amended our Constitution for prohibition. We changed our Constitution so you couldn’t have a beer. And then we thought that’s a bad idea, and we changed it back. Don’t tell me we can’t change the Constitution to get money out of politics.

Acyn

182,261 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

My full closing statement for the 2026 Florida Governor's Debate: This election is not about the who. This election is about the what. What vision for Florida do you want? I'm going to stand up and ban data centers. I'm going to fight for our citrus growers and cattle ranchers. I'm going to stand up for your 1st and 2nd amendment rights. I draw my principles from the U.S. Constitution and the Gospel of Jesus Christ. What we need right now is a revival in the state of Florida.
1:30

My full closing statement for the 2026 Florida Governor's Debate: This election is not about the who. This election is about the what. What vision for Florida do you want? I'm going to stand up and ban data centers. I'm going to fight for our citrus growers and cattle ranchers. I'm going to stand up for your 1st and 2nd amendment rights. I draw my principles from the U.S. Constitution and the Gospel of Jesus Christ. What we need right now is a revival in the state of Florida.

James Fishback

47,487 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🚨🚨BREAKING LEGAL ALERT: The Missouri Court of Appeals has ruled that lawyer Mark McCloskey, who brandished his weapons at protesters in 2020, along with his wife, can NOT have his guns back. Here are the facts. 👇 McClosky had asked the Missouri Court to return the AR-15 and pistol from that famous photo taken outside the their home. They gave up the two firearms when he pleaded guilty to a fourth degree misdemeanor in exchange for the state dismissing a felony charge. The court therefore ruled, “the permanent forfeiture (of the weapons) is a consequence of his guilt.” What are your thoughts? Does McCloskey DESERVE losing his guns?
0:30

🚨🚨BREAKING LEGAL ALERT: The Missouri Court of Appeals has ruled that lawyer Mark McCloskey, who brandished his weapons at protesters in 2020, along with his wife, can NOT have his guns back. Here are the facts. 👇 McClosky had asked the Missouri Court to return the AR-15 and pistol from that famous photo taken outside the their home. They gave up the two firearms when he pleaded guilty to a fourth degree misdemeanor in exchange for the state dismissing a felony charge. The court therefore ruled, “the permanent forfeiture (of the weapons) is a consequence of his guilt.” What are your thoughts? Does McCloskey DESERVE losing his guns?

CALL TO ACTIVISM

1,115,195 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Catholic bishops just filed a brief in the Supreme Court assault weapon ban case. And they would like you to know they are not taking a side. Except they kind of are. They want the Court to reject the idea that ownership numbers alone can make a category of weapons constitutionally protected beyond regulation. They also want the Court to preserve the authority of political communities to regulate weapons they say threaten public peace. Translation: Let politicians decide what rifles you get to own. That’s the part that gets me. It is always the people with security outside the door telling the rest of us we would be better off without one. When you go home tonight, nobody is posted in your driveway with a rifle. You are the security detail. And your rights cannot depend on whoever won the last election. One election your rights matter. Next election they don’t. That is exactly why the Constitution exists. That is exactly why the Second Amendment exists. And if the argument is that modern guns are too different from what existed at the Founding, then explain handguns. Because modern semi-auto pistols are not Founding-era weapons either. But Heller said handguns cannot be banned because they are commonly chosen by Americans for self-defense. So what makes the rifle different? That is the question they never answer. Do you think people with armed security should lecture regular Americans about giving up guns?
2:11

Catholic bishops just filed a brief in the Supreme Court assault weapon ban case. And they would like you to know they are not taking a side. Except they kind of are. They want the Court to reject the idea that ownership numbers alone can make a category of weapons constitutionally protected beyond regulation. They also want the Court to preserve the authority of political communities to regulate weapons they say threaten public peace. Translation: Let politicians decide what rifles you get to own. That’s the part that gets me. It is always the people with security outside the door telling the rest of us we would be better off without one. When you go home tonight, nobody is posted in your driveway with a rifle. You are the security detail. And your rights cannot depend on whoever won the last election. One election your rights matter. Next election they don’t. That is exactly why the Constitution exists. That is exactly why the Second Amendment exists. And if the argument is that modern guns are too different from what existed at the Founding, then explain handguns. Because modern semi-auto pistols are not Founding-era weapons either. But Heller said handguns cannot be banned because they are commonly chosen by Americans for self-defense. So what makes the rifle different? That is the question they never answer. Do you think people with armed security should lecture regular Americans about giving up guns?

Colion Noir

38,415 просмотров • 23 дней назад

If you think speech bans will stop with your enemies, history suggests otherwise. Here's one example: In 1974, the National Union of Students in the United Kingdom adopted a policy banning racist and fascist speakers. The Union of Jewish students supported the policy, thinking it would apply to the right-wing National Front. A few years later, the Jewish student group watched as some local unions used the policy to ban Zionist speakers on campus. As former ACLU Executive Director Ira Glasser once said, speech restrictions are like poison gas — they may seem like a powerful weapon when the enemy is in your sights and the wind is at your back. But the wind has a way of shifting. And when it does, you will want the right to offend firmly on your side. My closing remarks at the The Cambridge Union debate: "This House Believes In The Right To Offend."
1:02

If you think speech bans will stop with your enemies, history suggests otherwise. Here's one example: In 1974, the National Union of Students in the United Kingdom adopted a policy banning racist and fascist speakers. The Union of Jewish students supported the policy, thinking it would apply to the right-wing National Front. A few years later, the Jewish student group watched as some local unions used the policy to ban Zionist speakers on campus. As former ACLU Executive Director Ira Glasser once said, speech restrictions are like poison gas — they may seem like a powerful weapon when the enemy is in your sights and the wind is at your back. But the wind has a way of shifting. And when it does, you will want the right to offend firmly on your side. My closing remarks at the The Cambridge Union debate: "This House Believes In The Right To Offend."

Nico Perrino

71,875 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

People who do not follow the dementing debate about the meeting point of trans rights and women’s rights may not be aware of the name Grace Campbell. For anyone not in the know, she is the daughter of the celebrated podcaster and lunatic Alastair Campbell. Inevitably enough, she has a podcast of her own, a clip of which has resurfaced this week. It made some impact online thanks to a riff – alongside a male-to-female trans guest – in which Campbell ridiculed J.K. Rowling and other feminists. The two had a grand old time explaining that the women who disagree with them (many of whom happen to be older than them) are – on top of all their thought-crimes – also ugly. ✍️ Douglas Murray Article |
0:57

People who do not follow the dementing debate about the meeting point of trans rights and women’s rights may not be aware of the name Grace Campbell. For anyone not in the know, she is the daughter of the celebrated podcaster and lunatic Alastair Campbell. Inevitably enough, she has a podcast of her own, a clip of which has resurfaced this week. It made some impact online thanks to a riff – alongside a male-to-female trans guest – in which Campbell ridiculed J.K. Rowling and other feminists. The two had a grand old time explaining that the women who disagree with them (many of whom happen to be older than them) are – on top of all their thought-crimes – also ugly. ✍️ Douglas Murray Article |

The Spectator

84,351 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Admiral Robert Harward who grew up in Iran discusses what the country was like before radical Islam took over: "The Iranian people know what human rights are. They know what freedoms are. They want change and we have the opportunity to support them in a long overdue fashion." "People forget what this is all about. This is about basic human rights that the Iranian people have been denied for almost five decades now." "The Shah was very progressive. He had implemented human rights. He implemented women's rights. He implemented land reform. He had moved them into the twenty-first century. Women wore mini-skirts. There was casinos. There was skiing. It was very active. You could travel anywhere." "The whole region was pretty stable and peaceful and to see that all shattered with the Islamic revolution that came to power in '79 is just painful but now we have the opportunity to correct that."
2:26

Admiral Robert Harward who grew up in Iran discusses what the country was like before radical Islam took over: "The Iranian people know what human rights are. They know what freedoms are. They want change and we have the opportunity to support them in a long overdue fashion." "People forget what this is all about. This is about basic human rights that the Iranian people have been denied for almost five decades now." "The Shah was very progressive. He had implemented human rights. He implemented women's rights. He implemented land reform. He had moved them into the twenty-first century. Women wore mini-skirts. There was casinos. There was skiing. It was very active. You could travel anywhere." "The whole region was pretty stable and peaceful and to see that all shattered with the Islamic revolution that came to power in '79 is just painful but now we have the opportunity to correct that."

Benny Johnson

101,954 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Senator Josh Hawley made Fauci look ridiculous as he pleaded the 5th over even the most basic questions. He says Supreme Court precedent is clear that someone who has been pardoned cannot invoke the 5th Amendment in his situation. “Nothing says honesty like taking the 5th Doc?” “What day of the week is it today?” “What color tie are you wearing?” “What color’s the carpet in front of you?” “You don’t have any rights under the 5th Amendment because you’ve been pardoned, as you very well know.” “When he has been pardoned, he may not stand upon his privilege.” “This isn’t about the Constitution.” “This isn’t about the law.” “This is about contempt, contempt for this body and contempt for the American people.” Josh Hawley
1:08

Senator Josh Hawley made Fauci look ridiculous as he pleaded the 5th over even the most basic questions. He says Supreme Court precedent is clear that someone who has been pardoned cannot invoke the 5th Amendment in his situation. “Nothing says honesty like taking the 5th Doc?” “What day of the week is it today?” “What color tie are you wearing?” “What color’s the carpet in front of you?” “You don’t have any rights under the 5th Amendment because you’ve been pardoned, as you very well know.” “When he has been pardoned, he may not stand upon his privilege.” “This isn’t about the Constitution.” “This isn’t about the law.” “This is about contempt, contempt for this body and contempt for the American people.” Josh Hawley

MAHA Action

13,435 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад