Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Hey Hank Brennan, since when did the broken taillight that caused JOKs injuries to his arm turn into "broken glass"? The taillight is plastic, no?

Joe Flipperhead

18,175 subscribers

21,525 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

Comedy News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 Comments

Look the Other Way1 year ago

I would like to know the “methodology standard” that Hank Brennan used to determine that those injuries are from being cut up by a broken shards of polycarbonate taillight pieces…

Rock Paper Sizzle1 year ago

💯 Trump, the backbone of America. 💪 Getting this country back in shape. ⚡ Shirts that hit like lightning:

paris1 year ago

Plastic pieces that has barely any weight hit him, punctured a shirt, made cuts going one direction, exited from the same wholes and then traveled 15 ft pass impact to lay all around him multiple feet away. They are magical plastic pieces.

David Fox1 year ago

Fuck how dumb is this guy, he thinks time stops, a 6" tail light then shatters & spreads itself out across 18" of arm, punctures he arm and retracts, time then restarts and the car moves past so the cuts can made, but only to 1mm in depth. No wonder Alessi then destroyed him.

Kfaria1 year ago

And Yanetti was like, hold up, sidebar Bev. And Hank had to come back and start talking plastic. Great moment

Interested Party1 year ago

The fact that Alessi and Cannone had to have him come to sidebar to tell him to correct himself was hilarious.

maria mb18 ⚾️💙🧡1 year ago

Listening to him interrogate Dr. Russell raises my blood pressure.

NRLpicks (we are back baby!!)1 year ago

The perfect response here would have been sure and their would be blood all over those pieces

LAA1 year ago

Judge bev has lost her mind to let this moron carry on as he did today. It’s complete lunacy.

PaulExotique1 year ago

Brennan was way overrated when he first joined the prosecution (which, going outside to begin with is an admission of internal incompetence). Meanwhile Lally stews as he fetches Brennan’s coffee and lugs his file boxes around…

Related Videos

This video CLEARLY shows 2 RED, fully functioning taillights. Idc what anyone says, if that taillight were "broken" the way that it was in the crime scene photos, it would NOT be lighting up like that, especially with the diffusers broken. Not to mention, Maureen Hartnett and Ashley Vallier, the CSI techs, didn't do the reconstruction of the taillight until 3/2/23, OVER A YEAR after John O'Keefe was killed. I will never forget Mike Michaels video PROVING that if that taillight were broken the way they say it was, with only 1 small piece still intact, the diffusers broken out, the metal piece broken off, THERE WOULD BE NO LIGHT STILL GOING TO THAT TAILLIGHT! The diffusers make the light. Those 2 taillights in the still images DO NOT MATCH. Idgaf what anyone says, her taillight was not hit, or broken, by John O'Keefe's arm. It's not possible for an arm to do that WITH NO BRUISES OR BROKEN BONES!!! To break THICK plastic and METAL?? You're crazy if you think that happened. Just my intrusive 12:30am random thoughts. #FKR #FreeTurtleboy #KarenReadTaillight #JohnOKeefe #LexusLX570 #Proctor #MSP #CPD #CantonMA

This video CLEARLY shows 2 RED, fully functioning taillights. Idc what anyone says, if that taillight were "broken" the way that it was in the crime scene photos, it would NOT be lighting up like that, especially with the diffusers broken. Not to mention, Maureen Hartnett and Ashley Vallier, the CSI techs, didn't do the reconstruction of the taillight until 3/2/23, OVER A YEAR after John O'Keefe was killed. I will never forget Mike Michaels video PROVING that if that taillight were broken the way they say it was, with only 1 small piece still intact, the diffusers broken out, the metal piece broken off, THERE WOULD BE NO LIGHT STILL GOING TO THAT TAILLIGHT! The diffusers make the light. Those 2 taillights in the still images DO NOT MATCH. Idgaf what anyone says, her taillight was not hit, or broken, by John O'Keefe's arm. It's not possible for an arm to do that WITH NO BRUISES OR BROKEN BONES!!! To break THICK plastic and METAL?? You're crazy if you think that happened. Just my intrusive 12:30am random thoughts. #FKR #FreeTurtleboy #KarenReadTaillight #JohnOKeefe #LexusLX570 #Proctor #MSP #CPD #CantonMA

That Girl T

14,693 views • 17 days ago

JOKs injuries to his arm didn’t come from exploding taillight. JOK wasn’t projected onto the lawn after being struck on only the arm by an SUV. 2 doctors hired by the federal government already told us this. The CW ignored them and paid Judson Welcher to say otherwise.

JOKs injuries to his arm didn’t come from exploding taillight. JOK wasn’t projected onto the lawn after being struck on only the arm by an SUV. 2 doctors hired by the federal government already told us this. The CW ignored them and paid Judson Welcher to say otherwise.

Joe Flipperhead

43,156 views • 1 year ago

I slowed down Welcher’s overhead “testing” He 1000% rolls into the taillight after the initial contact so he can get paint on his upper arm in attempt to match JOKs bite marks on his arm The arm is a ball and socket joint, it should move independently. 2 MPH wouldn’t cause this

I slowed down Welcher’s overhead “testing” He 1000% rolls into the taillight after the initial contact so he can get paint on his upper arm in attempt to match JOKs bite marks on his arm The arm is a ball and socket joint, it should move independently. 2 MPH wouldn’t cause this

Joe Flipperhead

104,952 views • 1 year ago

Here is the full Sallyport Video WITH timecode. The number you are looking for is 5:46. That is the time the taillight is found at 34 Fairview. Minus 3:18 for the drive. The taillight has to be broken, picked up and on it's way by 5:42:42 When does it happen? Who does it? How?

Here is the full Sallyport Video WITH timecode. The number you are looking for is 5:46. That is the time the taillight is found at 34 Fairview. Minus 3:18 for the drive. The taillight has to be broken, picked up and on it's way by 5:42:42 When does it happen? Who does it? How?

Dan Donovan🌺

11,613 views • 1 month ago

You know they are getting desperate when the trolls go back to the Lexus taillight being their best piece of evidence to prove that "Karen Read is a killer". So for the uneducated folks in the back spreading bullshit, here is a cheat sheet: 🔹️the Lexus taillight is polycarbonate, not glass 🔹️all of the bulbs are red, not clear 🔹️when the diffuser is broken, NO LIGHT filters up or down the taillight 🔹️a reflector is on the side of the taillight which can appear "white" in certain reflections/lighting but there are no bulbs/LEDs on this reflector When leaving John O'Keefe's home at 5am, Karen's taillight shows no damage to it's diffusers as the taillight is completely lit. You see this as she brakes to pull out of the driveway. Guess what was found by Massachusetts State Police and SERT ~12 hours later at 34 Fairview? ➡️ A large piece of diffuser. Now let's ponder: If the diffuser was intact at 5am but then not at 545pm, what happened to it?

You know they are getting desperate when the trolls go back to the Lexus taillight being their best piece of evidence to prove that "Karen Read is a killer". So for the uneducated folks in the back spreading bullshit, here is a cheat sheet: 🔹️the Lexus taillight is polycarbonate, not glass 🔹️all of the bulbs are red, not clear 🔹️when the diffuser is broken, NO LIGHT filters up or down the taillight 🔹️a reflector is on the side of the taillight which can appear "white" in certain reflections/lighting but there are no bulbs/LEDs on this reflector When leaving John O'Keefe's home at 5am, Karen's taillight shows no damage to it's diffusers as the taillight is completely lit. You see this as she brakes to pull out of the driveway. Guess what was found by Massachusetts State Police and SERT ~12 hours later at 34 Fairview? ➡️ A large piece of diffuser. Now let's ponder: If the diffuser was intact at 5am but then not at 545pm, what happened to it?

BoozeyBeauty

28,596 views • 7 months ago

If a body is found next to a broken glass and the body has scratches on the arm. Who in their right mind is going to say. "Hey, let's look in the house to see if there is a dog that caused these scratches"

If a body is found next to a broken glass and the body has scratches on the arm. Who in their right mind is going to say. "Hey, let's look in the house to see if there is a dog that caused these scratches"

Dan Donovan🌺

10,717 views • 2 months ago

There was no taillight found next to John's body at that time. HOW DID JENN KNOW THERE WOULD BE TAILLIGHT FOUND at 6am that morning when her, Kerry and Karen first got to Brian Albert's house?

There was no taillight found next to John's body at that time. HOW DID JENN KNOW THERE WOULD BE TAILLIGHT FOUND at 6am that morning when her, Kerry and Karen first got to Brian Albert's house?

JustSouthOfHistory

69,960 views • 1 year ago

FKR continues to push the narrative that Karen Read’s passenger side taillight was intact in the picture attached and simply covered by snow. But thankfully Karen’s own father is here to help clear things up for them: This image is from a wellness check that took place at 1 Meadows around 8 AM on the morning of January 29, 2022. And here’s Bill Read himself confirming that yes, Karen’s taillight was already broken while her car was parked in the driveway at 1 Meadows WELL BEFORE the Massachusetts State Police ever took custody of her Lexus. ARCCA has stated that Karen Read bumping John O’Keefe’s vehicle around 5AM that morning at the speed she did would NOT have caused that damage to her taillight. So when did the damage occur? Facts matter. Just stop it.

FKR continues to push the narrative that Karen Read’s passenger side taillight was intact in the picture attached and simply covered by snow. But thankfully Karen’s own father is here to help clear things up for them: This image is from a wellness check that took place at 1 Meadows around 8 AM on the morning of January 29, 2022. And here’s Bill Read himself confirming that yes, Karen’s taillight was already broken while her car was parked in the driveway at 1 Meadows WELL BEFORE the Massachusetts State Police ever took custody of her Lexus. ARCCA has stated that Karen Read bumping John O’Keefe’s vehicle around 5AM that morning at the speed she did would NOT have caused that damage to her taillight. So when did the damage occur? Facts matter. Just stop it.

Jamz

30,271 views • 1 year ago

Hank Brennan’s citing the presence of touch DNA from Officer John O’Keefe found on Karen Read’s vehicle (in reality it was sampled from a taillight piece “found” at the scene, not on the actual vehicle) as being inculpatory. What he fails to mention is that TWO other unidentified DNA profiles were also found on that same piece of taillight. So is the Commonwealth’s new position that Karen Read struck and killed two other unidentified individuals with her taillight that night? #KarenRead #KarenReadTrial

Hank Brennan’s citing the presence of touch DNA from Officer John O’Keefe found on Karen Read’s vehicle (in reality it was sampled from a taillight piece “found” at the scene, not on the actual vehicle) as being inculpatory. What he fails to mention is that TWO other unidentified DNA profiles were also found on that same piece of taillight. So is the Commonwealth’s new position that Karen Read struck and killed two other unidentified individuals with her taillight that night? #KarenRead #KarenReadTrial

Olivia

36,395 views • 1 year ago

There is no blood, no skin, no tissue, no DNA found on a single piece or shard of taillight that the Commonwealth claims cut and sliced into John O’Keefe’s arm. Where is that trace evidence? Where is that biological evidence? The DNA? Where is it? They’ve got nothing! Not a single piece that the Commonwealth wants you to believe cut up John’s arm—how is that possible? #KarenRead #FreeKarenRead

There is no blood, no skin, no tissue, no DNA found on a single piece or shard of taillight that the Commonwealth claims cut and sliced into John O’Keefe’s arm. Where is that trace evidence? Where is that biological evidence? The DNA? Where is it? They’ve got nothing! Not a single piece that the Commonwealth wants you to believe cut up John’s arm—how is that possible? #KarenRead #FreeKarenRead

Olivia

24,279 views • 1 year ago

New Video- SERT SEARCH: Hiding The Damage When you look at this case through the lens that the MSP (Tully, Proctor & Yuri) were working an "honest investigation, not covering anything up"- is when you truly see how unexplainable their actions during the investigation were. Looking through that lens, when you think about Yuri, Proctor & Tully NOT providing SERT A photograph of the damaged taillight, there is no explanation for it. -They "KNEW" how much damage there was to the taillight -They KNEW SERT was at the scene LOOKING for the taillight -They KNEW that nobody at the scene knew how much damage was at the time. KNOWING this, for them to not send a picture to Tully of the damage to assist the SERT search makes ZERO sense. They should have WANTED to find as much taillight as possible. The problem is, the taillight they needed to be there, wasn't. yet.

New Video- SERT SEARCH: Hiding The Damage When you look at this case through the lens that the MSP (Tully, Proctor & Yuri) were working an "honest investigation, not covering anything up"- is when you truly see how unexplainable their actions during the investigation were. Looking through that lens, when you think about Yuri, Proctor & Tully NOT providing SERT A photograph of the damaged taillight, there is no explanation for it. -They "KNEW" how much damage there was to the taillight -They KNEW SERT was at the scene LOOKING for the taillight -They KNEW that nobody at the scene knew how much damage was at the time. KNOWING this, for them to not send a picture to Tully of the damage to assist the SERT search makes ZERO sense. They should have WANTED to find as much taillight as possible. The problem is, the taillight they needed to be there, wasn't. yet.

Joe Flipperhead

51,464 views • 1 year ago

Who inverted the new Karen Read footage from Pequitside Farm in Canton? My last post caused some confusion because I uploaded the clip exactly as it was produced by the DA’s office. That led to questions: which taillight are we looking at? Is the research wrong? Did I flip it? Am I losing it? 😅 Here’s the thing.. when reviewing new evidence, we have to anchor ourselves in what we already know. It’s easy to default to the simplest explanation (in this case, assuming the visible taillight is the driver’s side). But at this point, taking anything from the Norfolk County DA’s office at face value would be naïve. From the timeline we know: 🔹️ Kerry Roberts was driving her SUV behind Jen McCabe and Karen Read as they left Jen’s house heading toward John’s. 🔹️ Kerry was not present when Karen initially left John’s home earlier. 🔹️ Pequitside Farm sits on the right-hand side of the road when traveling from Jen’s to John’s. 🔹️ The camera is positioned on the right side of the road. If the camera is on the right, the taillight closest to it is the passenger-side taillight.. not the driver’s side. Which means the undamaged taillight we see closest to the camera is the very same taillight later photographed as obliterated in MSP evidence photos. So why does the clip make it look like we’re viewing the driver’s side? When looking at the original supplied footage, the “Do Not Enter” sign is backwards. So either we’re dealing with yet another mysteriously inverted camera… or the footage was flipped. The most important takeaway here isn’t left vs. right. It’s that Karen Read’s taillight is visibly intact. Not shattered. Not obliterated. Which brings us to the real question. If it wasn’t broken there, then who broke it?

Who inverted the new Karen Read footage from Pequitside Farm in Canton? My last post caused some confusion because I uploaded the clip exactly as it was produced by the DA’s office. That led to questions: which taillight are we looking at? Is the research wrong? Did I flip it? Am I losing it? 😅 Here’s the thing.. when reviewing new evidence, we have to anchor ourselves in what we already know. It’s easy to default to the simplest explanation (in this case, assuming the visible taillight is the driver’s side). But at this point, taking anything from the Norfolk County DA’s office at face value would be naïve. From the timeline we know: 🔹️ Kerry Roberts was driving her SUV behind Jen McCabe and Karen Read as they left Jen’s house heading toward John’s. 🔹️ Kerry was not present when Karen initially left John’s home earlier. 🔹️ Pequitside Farm sits on the right-hand side of the road when traveling from Jen’s to John’s. 🔹️ The camera is positioned on the right side of the road. If the camera is on the right, the taillight closest to it is the passenger-side taillight.. not the driver’s side. Which means the undamaged taillight we see closest to the camera is the very same taillight later photographed as obliterated in MSP evidence photos. So why does the clip make it look like we’re viewing the driver’s side? When looking at the original supplied footage, the “Do Not Enter” sign is backwards. So either we’re dealing with yet another mysteriously inverted camera… or the footage was flipped. The most important takeaway here isn’t left vs. right. It’s that Karen Read’s taillight is visibly intact. Not shattered. Not obliterated. Which brings us to the real question. If it wasn’t broken there, then who broke it?

BoozeyBeauty

43,474 views • 5 months ago