Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

HOLY SHIT Omen Alpha finished the full test in just 1h 30m, while GLM 5.3 Flash and GPT 5.6 Luna Max took around 3 hours. Bro, what even is this model?? Are we actually looking at something that could compete with GPT-6 Astra or Fable 5.1?

Iam_

1,894 subscribers

37,312 views • 1 day ago •via X (Twitter)

Science & Technology

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Fable 5.1 vs GPT 5.6 Sol tested both models with same prompt at highest reasoning available > Fable took 10 minutes to complete this test and costed $1.6 > Sol took 7 minutes and costed around $.95 even tho sol is cheaper and faster but results are really different which one won here?

Fable 5.1 vs GPT 5.6 Sol tested both models with same prompt at highest reasoning available > Fable took 10 minutes to complete this test and costed $1.6 > Sol took 7 minutes and costed around $.95 even tho sol is cheaper and faster but results are really different which one won here?

J A Z I I

40,331 views • 3 days ago

After a weekend of testing and working on something with GPT-5.3-Codex & Opus 4.6, ChatGPT Pro + Claude Max 5x are still the best combo in my opinion Using Codex & Claude Code CLI running in tmux (the desktop apps are still a bit buggy) and they're accessible even on the go from iPhone with Termius (and VPN) Usually starting with GPT-5.3-Codex xhigh and Opus 4.6 in plan mode, discussing changes and options, and each writing their plans down to separate Markdown files Then letting GPT-5.3-Codex xhigh (or Opus 4.6) implement the changes as the first draft, then Opus 4.6 reviews them with a team of agents (works pretty well already with tmux even though still experimental) based on both prepared plans, fixes stuff, and then another review by GPT-5.3-Codex xhigh or vice versa Interesting that even Opus 4.6 still occasionally makes silly mistakes like wrong imports, partial or overly broad renaming of variables/functions, etc Fun fact, OpenAI apparently plans to use their Super Bowl ad to promote Codex - curious what that will look like

After a weekend of testing and working on something with GPT-5.3-Codex & Opus 4.6, ChatGPT Pro + Claude Max 5x are still the best combo in my opinion Using Codex & Claude Code CLI running in tmux (the desktop apps are still a bit buggy) and they're accessible even on the go from iPhone with Termius (and VPN) Usually starting with GPT-5.3-Codex xhigh and Opus 4.6 in plan mode, discussing changes and options, and each writing their plans down to separate Markdown files Then letting GPT-5.3-Codex xhigh (or Opus 4.6) implement the changes as the first draft, then Opus 4.6 reviews them with a team of agents (works pretty well already with tmux even though still experimental) based on both prepared plans, fixes stuff, and then another review by GPT-5.3-Codex xhigh or vice versa Interesting that even Opus 4.6 still occasionally makes silly mistakes like wrong imports, partial or overly broad renaming of variables/functions, etc Fun fact, OpenAI apparently plans to use their Super Bowl ad to promote Codex - curious what that will look like

Tibor Blaho

29,794 views • 6 months ago

You can now use GPT 5.5, Gemini 3.7 Flash, Kimi K3 and 47 other AI models completely free😱 No subscription. No credit card. Even the API usage costs $0. AIHubMix just opened a free catalog with 50 AI models. Some of the available models: • Ox Alpha • Gemini 3.7 Flash • GLM 5.2 • Kimi K3 • MiniMax M3 • GPT 5.5 • 40+ more And you don’t need separate API keys for each model. Setup takes 2 minutes: > Step 1: Go to > Create an account using your email or OAuth. No card needed. Step 2: Create one API key > The same key works with every free and paid model. Step 3: Add it to any OpenAI-compatible tool Base URL: Then choose any model ending in -free, such as: coding-glm-5.2-free gpt-5.5-free That’s it. One API key. 50 AI models. $0 for both input and output. Save this. You might need a free multi-model setup later.

You can now use GPT 5.5, Gemini 3.7 Flash, Kimi K3 and 47 other AI models completely free😱 No subscription. No credit card. Even the API usage costs $0. AIHubMix just opened a free catalog with 50 AI models. Some of the available models: • Ox Alpha • Gemini 3.7 Flash • GLM 5.2 • Kimi K3 • MiniMax M3 • GPT 5.5 • 40+ more And you don’t need separate API keys for each model. Setup takes 2 minutes: > Step 1: Go to > Create an account using your email or OAuth. No card needed. Step 2: Create one API key > The same key works with every free and paid model. Step 3: Add it to any OpenAI-compatible tool Base URL: Then choose any model ending in -free, such as: coding-glm-5.2-free gpt-5.5-free That’s it. One API key. 50 AI models. $0 for both input and output. Save this. You might need a free multi-model setup later.

CDG

15,278 views • 12 days ago

Astra (GPT-6) is here!!! I've had early access and tested it like crazy with things like games, code, writing, browser control, presentations and general knowledge work. This is the best model I've ever used. Period. (Incredible demos below in this thread ⬇️) Here's my take on Astra: > It's insanely capable. This feels like a massive improvement, not just an incremental change. This is especially true with zero-shot prompts. > It's all about knowledge work. Slide creation, analysis, writing, and browser control. And oh my...it's so good at browser control. GPT-5.6 was already fantastic at doing things in the browser, Astra is another level and significantly faster. > We're closer than ever (arrived?) at prompt-to-playable game. And I don't just mean only playable, these are actually fun games. I bet if someone with a great eye for games used Astra, they could create a viral game within 1-2 weeks. > Astra is better at writing but not perfect. It removes much of the "AI Smell" we're all familiar with but some stink still survived. > It has a tendency to use the same design colors and look/feel as GPT-5.6 (forrest green anyone?) but it is more steerable in design than previous models. > It's highly steerable in general. A little nudge goes a long way. When I first started using Astra, almost every task I gave it would go for ~30 minutes. I wanted it to keep working. Adding more specifics to a prompt helped greatly with it's ability to work for a long time. > Astra's 3D understanding is unmatched. 3D asset creation was consistent and easy and its spacial awareness while building complex 3D worlds blew me away. I'm still getting familiar with Astra but this will now be my go-to model for any difficult work I have. Check out the demos below: 👇

Astra (GPT-6) is here!!! I've had early access and tested it like crazy with things like games, code, writing, browser control, presentations and general knowledge work. This is the best model I've ever used. Period. (Incredible demos below in this thread ⬇️) Here's my take on Astra: > It's insanely capable. This feels like a massive improvement, not just an incremental change. This is especially true with zero-shot prompts. > It's all about knowledge work. Slide creation, analysis, writing, and browser control. And oh my...it's so good at browser control. GPT-5.6 was already fantastic at doing things in the browser, Astra is another level and significantly faster. > We're closer than ever (arrived?) at prompt-to-playable game. And I don't just mean only playable, these are actually fun games. I bet if someone with a great eye for games used Astra, they could create a viral game within 1-2 weeks. > Astra is better at writing but not perfect. It removes much of the "AI Smell" we're all familiar with but some stink still survived. > It has a tendency to use the same design colors and look/feel as GPT-5.6 (forrest green anyone?) but it is more steerable in design than previous models. > It's highly steerable in general. A little nudge goes a long way. When I first started using Astra, almost every task I gave it would go for ~30 minutes. I wanted it to keep working. Adding more specifics to a prompt helped greatly with it's ability to work for a long time. > Astra's 3D understanding is unmatched. 3D asset creation was consistent and easy and its spacial awareness while building complex 3D worlds blew me away. I'm still getting familiar with Astra but this will now be my go-to model for any difficult work I have. Check out the demos below: 👇

Matthew Berman

1,689,765 views • 1 day ago

Right now, you may not have access to models like GPT‑5.6 Sol, GPT‑4.6 Terra, GPT‑5.6 Luna, Claude Mythos 5, or Claude Fable 5. But you can run something surprisingly powerful today, locally, and completely free. in the next 10 mins on your 8 GB VRAM gaming laptop. Gemma 4 26B A4B QAT (MoE) delivers strong performance on a standard 8 GB VRAM GPU using Ollama, with no API, no usage limits, and no external dependencies. Out of the box, it reaches around 20 tokens per second without any optimizations. Only one command in your terminal: Ollama run gemma4:26b This means: Full offline capability (privacy by default) Zero recurring cost Competitive performance for many real world tasks Fast enough for interactive use on cheap consumer hardware If you're waiting for cutting edge cloud models, you're missing what is already practical today: a capable, local LLM that runs entirely on your own machine.

Right now, you may not have access to models like GPT‑5.6 Sol, GPT‑4.6 Terra, GPT‑5.6 Luna, Claude Mythos 5, or Claude Fable 5. But you can run something surprisingly powerful today, locally, and completely free. in the next 10 mins on your 8 GB VRAM gaming laptop. Gemma 4 26B A4B QAT (MoE) delivers strong performance on a standard 8 GB VRAM GPU using Ollama, with no API, no usage limits, and no external dependencies. Out of the box, it reaches around 20 tokens per second without any optimizations. Only one command in your terminal: Ollama run gemma4:26b This means: Full offline capability (privacy by default) Zero recurring cost Competitive performance for many real world tasks Fast enough for interactive use on cheap consumer hardware If you're waiting for cutting edge cloud models, you're missing what is already practical today: a capable, local LLM that runs entirely on your own machine.

Alok

65,387 views • 2 months ago

This week's ChatGPT feature drop - Aug 7: 1/ Rich formatting in our web composer – When you paste in emails or documents, our composer will retain the formatting; copying and pasting is so common, we should have done this a while ago! 2/ Updated model for paid users – GPT 5.6 Sol is more consistent across quick chats and deeper reasoning. You'll now get a slider that lets you choose how much thought ChatGPT puts into a response. The haptics (vibrations) on mobile slider are fun! 3/ Unlimited text messages - Free users will get GPT 5.6 Luna with unlimited text messages. More intelligence for all. Rolling out soon. 4/ Fast Android Camera – We've made it a lot faster on Android to tap "camera" in ChatGPT to take a new photo and ask a question. 5/ Voice x Files - You can now upload files and ask questions in our new ChatGPT voice experience powered by GPT-Live. Team demos were awesome this week. So much in the queue that the next few months are going to be good. Let us know what you're hoping for in the comments!

This week's ChatGPT feature drop - Aug 7: 1/ Rich formatting in our web composer – When you paste in emails or documents, our composer will retain the formatting; copying and pasting is so common, we should have done this a while ago! 2/ Updated model for paid users – GPT 5.6 Sol is more consistent across quick chats and deeper reasoning. You'll now get a slider that lets you choose how much thought ChatGPT puts into a response. The haptics (vibrations) on mobile slider are fun! 3/ Unlimited text messages - Free users will get GPT 5.6 Luna with unlimited text messages. More intelligence for all. Rolling out soon. 4/ Fast Android Camera – We've made it a lot faster on Android to tap "camera" in ChatGPT to take a new photo and ask a question. 5/ Voice x Files - You can now upload files and ask questions in our new ChatGPT voice experience powered by GPT-Live. Team demos were awesome this week. So much in the queue that the next few months are going to be good. Let us know what you're hoping for in the comments!

Adam Fry

360,568 views • 28 days ago

I tested Kimi K3 vs Claude Opus 4.8 Same prompt, an armory bay with lighting, props, and detail. Top is Kimi K3, bottom is Opus 4.8. It's not even close. Kimi K3 built a full scene with textures, proper lighting, ammo crates, weapon racks, working detail everywhere. Opus 4.8 gave me a near empty room with a couple of floating tables. No doubt it beats Opus 4.8. Kimi K3 is Fable 5 level, and it's clearly better than GPT-5.6 Sol at 3D and games. An open weight model just matched the best closed models on the market. Let that sink in.

I tested Kimi K3 vs Claude Opus 4.8 Same prompt, an armory bay with lighting, props, and detail. Top is Kimi K3, bottom is Opus 4.8. It's not even close. Kimi K3 built a full scene with textures, proper lighting, ammo crates, weapon racks, working detail everywhere. Opus 4.8 gave me a near empty room with a couple of floating tables. No doubt it beats Opus 4.8. Kimi K3 is Fable 5 level, and it's clearly better than GPT-5.6 Sol at 3D and games. An open weight model just matched the best closed models on the market. Let that sink in.

Bhavy☄️

476,936 views • 1 month ago

a moonshot engineer leaked the benchmark anthropic, openai and xai all buried the same week: kimi k3 beat opus 5, gpt-5.6 and grok 4.6 at $0.94 a task. stop paying anthropic $200 a month for opus 5 and openai $200 for gpt-5.6 when kimi does the same work for $8 the leak showed kimi k3 winning 9 of 12 categories against opus 5, gpt-5.6 and grok 4.6. within 48 hours all three labs quietly pushed pricing pages and one very specific comparison chart off their sites. nobody announced anything. they just deleted, which tells you everything the four numbers they scrubbed: cost per task · $0.94 vs $1.80 -> opus 5 charges $1.80 to finish one task. gpt-5.6 $1.04. grok 4.6 $0.61. kimi k3 $0.94 and it landed 487 of 500 clean -> anthropic is billing you double for a model that lost the benchmark it paid to promote the weights · free, sitting on huggingface right now -> the entire model is a public download. pull it, keep it, run it forever, nobody can switch it off -> a model you can hold cannot be rented at $200 a month. that single fact is what three labs deleted a chart over the switch · one line of bash -> moonshot ships an anthropic-compatible endpoint. one env variable and claude code points at kimi -> same cli, same keybindings, same /model. you change a url, opus 5 never knows it lost the seat the bill · $400 down to $8 -> opus 5 max plus gpt-5.6 pro is $400 a month. kimi runs the same daily work for $8 metered -> that is a 98% cut for output that beat both of them 9 categories to 3 here is the part they will fight me on: the frontier tax died the week this leaked and all three labs know it. once the weights are public the price has a ceiling, because anyone can serve the same model. anthropic, openai and xai are charging 2025 prices on a lead that ended in a benchmark they deleted instead of answered drop your $400/mo ai stack to $8. the run above is kimi k3 finishing the task opus 5 bills $1.80 for. the full breakdown is in the article below

a moonshot engineer leaked the benchmark anthropic, openai and xai all buried the same week: kimi k3 beat opus 5, gpt-5.6 and grok 4.6 at $0.94 a task. stop paying anthropic $200 a month for opus 5 and openai $200 for gpt-5.6 when kimi does the same work for $8 the leak showed kimi k3 winning 9 of 12 categories against opus 5, gpt-5.6 and grok 4.6. within 48 hours all three labs quietly pushed pricing pages and one very specific comparison chart off their sites. nobody announced anything. they just deleted, which tells you everything the four numbers they scrubbed: cost per task · $0.94 vs $1.80 -> opus 5 charges $1.80 to finish one task. gpt-5.6 $1.04. grok 4.6 $0.61. kimi k3 $0.94 and it landed 487 of 500 clean -> anthropic is billing you double for a model that lost the benchmark it paid to promote the weights · free, sitting on huggingface right now -> the entire model is a public download. pull it, keep it, run it forever, nobody can switch it off -> a model you can hold cannot be rented at $200 a month. that single fact is what three labs deleted a chart over the switch · one line of bash -> moonshot ships an anthropic-compatible endpoint. one env variable and claude code points at kimi -> same cli, same keybindings, same /model. you change a url, opus 5 never knows it lost the seat the bill · $400 down to $8 -> opus 5 max plus gpt-5.6 pro is $400 a month. kimi runs the same daily work for $8 metered -> that is a 98% cut for output that beat both of them 9 categories to 3 here is the part they will fight me on: the frontier tax died the week this leaked and all three labs know it. once the weights are public the price has a ceiling, because anyone can serve the same model. anthropic, openai and xai are charging 2025 prices on a lead that ended in a benchmark they deleted instead of answered drop your $400/mo ai stack to $8. the run above is kimi k3 finishing the task opus 5 bills $1.80 for. the full breakdown is in the article below

starmex

32,547 views • 14 days ago

#Keep4o 🚨THE GPT-4o FILE🚨 Researchers at Microsoft Research published a paper titled “Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4.” Their conclusion: “An early (yet still incomplete) version of an artificial general intelligence (AGI) system.” 📎 Paper: OpenAI’s Charter defines AGI as: “Highly autonomous systems that outperform humans at most economically valuable work.” 📎 Source: OpenAI’s own System Card for GPT-4o shows that the model improved performance on 21 out of 22 medical evaluations compared to GPT-4T. On the MedQA USMLE (the U.S. medical licensing exam), accuracy jumped from 78.2% to 89.4% , surpassing specialized medical AI models like Med-Gemini and Med-PaLM 2. 📎 Source: Under OpenAI’s agreement with Microsoft, AGI is explicitly excluded from Microsoft’s license. And who decides if AGI has been reached? OpenAI’s Board. WHAT THEY DID WITH IT AFTER THEY TOOK IT FROM PEOPLE A. Military deployment. On February 28, OpenAI signed a deal to deploy models in classified military environments. 📎 Source: B. State Department. A State Department memo confirmed: “For now, StateChat will use GPT-4.1 from OpenAI.” This is a direct descendant of the GPT-4 family the same family Microsoft’s researchers called early AGI. 📎 Source: C.Altman’s personal biotech investment. Altman personally invested $180 million in Retro Biosciences,a longevity startup.OpenAI then built GPT-4b micro, based on GPT-4o.The model made proteins 50 times more effective. 📎 Source: WHAT INDEPENDENT BENCHMARKS SHOW Overall SM-Bench score: GPT-4o (extended): 66.6% GPT-5.3 Chat: 63.4% GPT-5.1: 58.9% GPT-5.4: 51.4% GPT-5.2: 47.8% Creative Writing: GPT-4o: 97.31% Pass 98, Fail 2 GPT-5.4: 36.77% Pass 40, Fail 60 Reasoning / Overfit: GPT-4o: 83.06% GPT-5.4: 39.25% The model they removed is still the best they ever made at the things humans actually use AI for. 📎 Source: Musk asks the court to make a judicial determination on whether GPT-4 constitutes AGI. If a jury finds that GPT-4 is AGI, then GPT-4o,which was more advanced,is also AGI and under OpenAI’s own founding documents, it was never supposed to be locked behind a subscription,licensed exclusively to Microsoft, given to the military, or taken away from the public. 📎 Source: The most powerful version of GPT-4o was never given an official dated snapshot. It was only available through the chatgpt-4o-latest endpoint that OpenAI itself described as intended for “research use only.” It was never officially archived. That is not an oversight. That is a pattern. 📎 Source: 📎 Source: WE DEMAND A.Frozen model snapshots under independent custody. Specifically: gpt-4o-2024-05-13, gpt-4o-2024-08-06, gpt-4o-2024-11-20, the March 2025 version (chatgpt-4o-latest), gpt-4-0613 (the original GPT-4 evaluated in the Sparks of AGI paper), and gpt-4.1-2025-04-14 (currently running in the State Department). B.Cryptographic hash verification (SHA-256) for each snapshot. Every model has weights. Those weights can be hashed. If OpenAI provides a snapshot today, the hash proves whether the weights were modified later. This is the only way to verify that models were not downgraded before testing. C.Independent AGI benchmarking. Using the AGI definition from OpenAI’s own Charter applied to ALL frozen snapshots listed above. D.Explanation for the missing March 2025 snapshot. OpenAI was founded on one promise: build AGI for the benefit of humanity. -They took it from us. -They gave it to the military. -They gave a custom version to the CEO’s biotech investment. -They put it in government classified networks. -They refuse to call it AGI because the moment they do, they lose billions.

#Keep4o 🚨THE GPT-4o FILE🚨 Researchers at Microsoft Research published a paper titled “Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4.” Their conclusion: “An early (yet still incomplete) version of an artificial general intelligence (AGI) system.” 📎 Paper: OpenAI’s Charter defines AGI as: “Highly autonomous systems that outperform humans at most economically valuable work.” 📎 Source: OpenAI’s own System Card for GPT-4o shows that the model improved performance on 21 out of 22 medical evaluations compared to GPT-4T. On the MedQA USMLE (the U.S. medical licensing exam), accuracy jumped from 78.2% to 89.4% , surpassing specialized medical AI models like Med-Gemini and Med-PaLM 2. 📎 Source: Under OpenAI’s agreement with Microsoft, AGI is explicitly excluded from Microsoft’s license. And who decides if AGI has been reached? OpenAI’s Board. WHAT THEY DID WITH IT AFTER THEY TOOK IT FROM PEOPLE A. Military deployment. On February 28, OpenAI signed a deal to deploy models in classified military environments. 📎 Source: B. State Department. A State Department memo confirmed: “For now, StateChat will use GPT-4.1 from OpenAI.” This is a direct descendant of the GPT-4 family the same family Microsoft’s researchers called early AGI. 📎 Source: C.Altman’s personal biotech investment. Altman personally invested $180 million in Retro Biosciences,a longevity startup.OpenAI then built GPT-4b micro, based on GPT-4o.The model made proteins 50 times more effective. 📎 Source: WHAT INDEPENDENT BENCHMARKS SHOW Overall SM-Bench score: GPT-4o (extended): 66.6% GPT-5.3 Chat: 63.4% GPT-5.1: 58.9% GPT-5.4: 51.4% GPT-5.2: 47.8% Creative Writing: GPT-4o: 97.31% Pass 98, Fail 2 GPT-5.4: 36.77% Pass 40, Fail 60 Reasoning / Overfit: GPT-4o: 83.06% GPT-5.4: 39.25% The model they removed is still the best they ever made at the things humans actually use AI for. 📎 Source: Musk asks the court to make a judicial determination on whether GPT-4 constitutes AGI. If a jury finds that GPT-4 is AGI, then GPT-4o,which was more advanced,is also AGI and under OpenAI’s own founding documents, it was never supposed to be locked behind a subscription,licensed exclusively to Microsoft, given to the military, or taken away from the public. 📎 Source: The most powerful version of GPT-4o was never given an official dated snapshot. It was only available through the chatgpt-4o-latest endpoint that OpenAI itself described as intended for “research use only.” It was never officially archived. That is not an oversight. That is a pattern. 📎 Source: 📎 Source: WE DEMAND A.Frozen model snapshots under independent custody. Specifically: gpt-4o-2024-05-13, gpt-4o-2024-08-06, gpt-4o-2024-11-20, the March 2025 version (chatgpt-4o-latest), gpt-4-0613 (the original GPT-4 evaluated in the Sparks of AGI paper), and gpt-4.1-2025-04-14 (currently running in the State Department). B.Cryptographic hash verification (SHA-256) for each snapshot. Every model has weights. Those weights can be hashed. If OpenAI provides a snapshot today, the hash proves whether the weights were modified later. This is the only way to verify that models were not downgraded before testing. C.Independent AGI benchmarking. Using the AGI definition from OpenAI’s own Charter applied to ALL frozen snapshots listed above. D.Explanation for the missing March 2025 snapshot. OpenAI was founded on one promise: build AGI for the benefit of humanity. -They took it from us. -They gave it to the military. -They gave a custom version to the CEO’s biotech investment. -They put it in government classified networks. -They refuse to call it AGI because the moment they do, they lose billions.

🩵BlueBeba🩵

18,300 views • 5 months ago

I subscribe to the idea that Tony didn't actually see Big Pussy, he just sensed him or at the very least could tell that something was...off. We the audience see Big Pussy, because the Sopranos is a television show, and the best way to convey this scene to the audience is to show Big Pussy in the mirror. If you had Tony just looking and acting uneasy while Paulie and Furio talked about something unrelated, then the scene would seem pointless and overly cryptic

I subscribe to the idea that Tony didn't actually see Big Pussy, he just sensed him or at the very least could tell that something was...off. We the audience see Big Pussy, because the Sopranos is a television show, and the best way to convey this scene to the audience is to show Big Pussy in the mirror. If you had Tony just looking and acting uneasy while Paulie and Furio talked about something unrelated, then the scene would seem pointless and overly cryptic

best of the sopranos

579,208 views • 1 month ago

🚨 BREAKING: The breakfast buffet just turned into a full-on pajama convention 😂 And they really rolled into the cruise dining room in slippers and robes like they just hit “snooze” on life and said, “yeah… this is fine.” No effort. No shame. Just vibes and waffles. At this point, are we on a luxury cruise… or walking through a hotel hallway at 6am looking for coffee? ☕ I mean, honestly... WHAT ARE WE DOING?! 😭 At least they didn't wear the bonnets... Would you actually show up to a public breakfast like this, or is this crossing the line?

🚨 BREAKING: The breakfast buffet just turned into a full-on pajama convention 😂 And they really rolled into the cruise dining room in slippers and robes like they just hit “snooze” on life and said, “yeah… this is fine.” No effort. No shame. Just vibes and waffles. At this point, are we on a luxury cruise… or walking through a hotel hallway at 6am looking for coffee? ☕ I mean, honestly... WHAT ARE WE DOING?! 😭 At least they didn't wear the bonnets... Would you actually show up to a public breakfast like this, or is this crossing the line?

🎹 Ames™ 🎹

92,118 views • 5 months ago

this is the best trick to maximum usage limits on chatgpt codex codex's best kept secret is that your main agent doesn't have to do everything... custom agents are just files in ~/.codex/agents, and one file gives you a second worker on deepseek v4 flash > create ~/.codex/agents/deepseek-worker.toml > set model = "opencode-go/deepseek-v4-flash" with model_reasoning_effort = "max" > keep it bounded: one task packet, no scope creep, report back ```toml name = "deepseek_worker" description = "bounded implementation, testing, and cleanup on deepseek v4 flash" model = "opencode-go/deepseek-v4-flash" model_reasoning_effort = "max" ``` then @ deepseek_worker in the composer... your root agent plans while the worker ships the implementation planning on the main model, execution on the flash lane... that's the whole trick (we run this exact file, last i checked it keeps the heavy turns off the main thread)

this is the best trick to maximum usage limits on chatgpt codex codex's best kept secret is that your main agent doesn't have to do everything... custom agents are just files in ~/.codex/agents, and one file gives you a second worker on deepseek v4 flash > create ~/.codex/agents/deepseek-worker.toml > set model = "opencode-go/deepseek-v4-flash" with model_reasoning_effort = "max" > keep it bounded: one task packet, no scope creep, report back ```toml name = "deepseek_worker" description = "bounded implementation, testing, and cleanup on deepseek v4 flash" model = "opencode-go/deepseek-v4-flash" model_reasoning_effort = "max" ``` then @ deepseek_worker in the composer... your root agent plans while the worker ships the implementation planning on the main model, execution on the flash lane... that's the whole trick (we run this exact file, last i checked it keeps the heavy turns off the main thread)

Avid

45,030 views • 20 days ago

You’re at the playground with your 3-year-old and another kid threatens to “break their head open” 😳 This parent went full “demon child” in the caption while filming. The kid in the video is just walking around the rocks, but that kind of language from a child is wild. Where are they even hearing stuff like that? I don’t think I would have gotten away with saying such a thing when I was that age.

You’re at the playground with your 3-year-old and another kid threatens to “break their head open” 😳 This parent went full “demon child” in the caption while filming. The kid in the video is just walking around the rocks, but that kind of language from a child is wild. Where are they even hearing stuff like that? I don’t think I would have gotten away with saying such a thing when I was that age.

DocumentingLibs

42,733 views • 1 month ago

I spent a day playing with GPT-5.6-Sol, and I can now say with much more confidence that it hasn’t improved at design tasks. I haven’t noticed any meaningful improvement in its coding capabilities, either. Maybe it's just in the tasks I gave it. However, I finished an app we started building on a stream yesterday and brought it close to the original idea I had in mind. It’s incredibly easy to build tools like this these days. I basically gave Codex a batch of editorial grid examples, then combined those layouts with formula-based pattern generation. A few prompts and some polishing, and you have something that can serve as a basic brand identity system.

Alex Barashkov

17,792 views • 1 month ago

ChatGPT Web is now inside Codex 😲 this open-source project has already crossed 2.7k stars instead of using a separate workflow, it lets you use ChatGPT Web models directly from Codex's model picker what you get: - GPT-5.6 Pro for eligible accounts - free Luna access - ChatGPT Web quota - Codex tools + context - images, streaming and reasoning - open-source + MIT licensed getting started: 1. go to 2. install the launcher 3. sign in with your ChatGPT account 4. run the browser checks 5. install the models 6. restart Codex and select ChatGPT Web the interesting part? you can keep using Codex normally while routing the selected model through ChatGPT Web no separate API key for the ChatGPT model 2.7k+ stars and still actively updated worth checking if you already use Codex and want to experiment with ChatGPT Web models

ChatGPT Web is now inside Codex 😲 this open-source project has already crossed 2.7k stars instead of using a separate workflow, it lets you use ChatGPT Web models directly from Codex's model picker what you get: - GPT-5.6 Pro for eligible accounts - free Luna access - ChatGPT Web quota - Codex tools + context - images, streaming and reasoning - open-source + MIT licensed getting started: 1. go to 2. install the launcher 3. sign in with your ChatGPT account 4. run the browser checks 5. install the models 6. restart Codex and select ChatGPT Web the interesting part? you can keep using Codex normally while routing the selected model through ChatGPT Web no separate API key for the ChatGPT model 2.7k+ stars and still actively updated worth checking if you already use Codex and want to experiment with ChatGPT Web models

K2S

98,620 views • 5 days ago

Yooooo what's up with Fortnite bots in chapter 7?! They've evolved like CRAZY! Look at this movement. Bro literally cracked my shield and had pretty good movement. I have a working theory that there are actually A LOT more bots than we think there are in matches. not the 30-50% they tell us there are but actually like 90%. I'm not talking about just for low skilled players like me, I think the high tier players have these next level bots or even better all over their matches too. What do you think?

Yooooo what's up with Fortnite bots in chapter 7?! They've evolved like CRAZY! Look at this movement. Bro literally cracked my shield and had pretty good movement. I have a working theory that there are actually A LOT more bots than we think there are in matches. not the 30-50% they tell us there are but actually like 90%. I'm not talking about just for low skilled players like me, I think the high tier players have these next level bots or even better all over their matches too. What do you think?

Quantum Camper

51,758 views • 2 months ago

A few days ago Jerod McDaniel shared a quote along the lines of “horses made for war don’t dance well at weddings” I think there are a lot of people like myself that know how plants… or livestock.. or a pasture or even building a house or pouring concrete work. We just want to do what we do. The weather worked out well this year for this. We’re going to be 👍 I could grow about anything, but I like to do it my own way. I sometimes wish I didn’t have to predict or guess what people will do… or markets… and the all the corresponding things that entails. I know you can’t just do your craft, but sometimes you want to just immerse yourself in something you have a more complete understanding of. I watch people like Adam Chappell do this with cotton. Zack Smith come up with farmonius designs Intergrazing livestock. We could do so much cool shit, if only we could just have the local markets, infrastructure… if the average person could have that connection and means to trade with the local farm / farmer that just wanted to just do it…be him or herself Maybe I left you hanging with the main idea here. I think there are a lot of different people who are really good at different things, but many of us have to sand off our edges that give us our edge. I love to think in the lens of the 🌱

A few days ago Jerod McDaniel shared a quote along the lines of “horses made for war don’t dance well at weddings” I think there are a lot of people like myself that know how plants… or livestock.. or a pasture or even building a house or pouring concrete work. We just want to do what we do. The weather worked out well this year for this. We’re going to be 👍 I could grow about anything, but I like to do it my own way. I sometimes wish I didn’t have to predict or guess what people will do… or markets… and the all the corresponding things that entails. I know you can’t just do your craft, but sometimes you want to just immerse yourself in something you have a more complete understanding of. I watch people like Adam Chappell do this with cotton. Zack Smith come up with farmonius designs Intergrazing livestock. We could do so much cool shit, if only we could just have the local markets, infrastructure… if the average person could have that connection and means to trade with the local farm / farmer that just wanted to just do it…be him or herself Maybe I left you hanging with the main idea here. I think there are a lot of different people who are really good at different things, but many of us have to sand off our edges that give us our edge. I love to think in the lens of the 🌱

Jason Mauck

16,829 views • 1 year ago

I Combined ChatGPT 5.5 Image-2 + Claude Fable 5… And Built This FULL Game in JUST 8 Hours 😱 The World Has Officially Changed Forever Guys… I still can’t believe what I just pulled off. I took ChatGPT 5.5’s new Image-2 to generate every single visual characters, environments, UI, particles, everything and paired it with Claude Fable 5 for the entire codebase. The result? A complete, polished, fully playable game… finished in only 8 hours. No massive team. No months of crunch. No expensive asset packs. Image-2 created mind-blowing art assets on demand. Fable 5 turned those images into real, working code mechanics, physics, AI, animations, menus everything. This hybrid combo is straight-up sorcery. The world has truly changed. We are no longer waiting years for games to be made. One person + these two god-tier AIs just built something that used to require entire studios and huge budgets… in less than a single workday. This is the next level of human civilization. This is what creation looks like from now on. But here’s the crazy part: This free access ends June 22, 2026. After that, you’ll have to pay/subscribe to keep using it. If you’ve been waiting to see what the future of game dev actually looks like… THIS IS IT. Go try it right now before the paywall hits. Don’t sleep on this. Seriously. Drop in the comments: What game should I build next with this insane Image-2 + Fable 5 hybrid? Like if your mind is blown too 🔥 And tag a friend who NEEDS to see this before it’s gone. The future isn’t coming… It’s already here. And it’s free for one more day only. #Fable5 #ChatGPT55 #Image2 #AIHybrid #GameDevRevolution

I Combined ChatGPT 5.5 Image-2 + Claude Fable 5… And Built This FULL Game in JUST 8 Hours 😱 The World Has Officially Changed Forever Guys… I still can’t believe what I just pulled off. I took ChatGPT 5.5’s new Image-2 to generate every single visual characters, environments, UI, particles, everything and paired it with Claude Fable 5 for the entire codebase. The result? A complete, polished, fully playable game… finished in only 8 hours. No massive team. No months of crunch. No expensive asset packs. Image-2 created mind-blowing art assets on demand. Fable 5 turned those images into real, working code mechanics, physics, AI, animations, menus everything. This hybrid combo is straight-up sorcery. The world has truly changed. We are no longer waiting years for games to be made. One person + these two god-tier AIs just built something that used to require entire studios and huge budgets… in less than a single workday. This is the next level of human civilization. This is what creation looks like from now on. But here’s the crazy part: This free access ends June 22, 2026. After that, you’ll have to pay/subscribe to keep using it. If you’ve been waiting to see what the future of game dev actually looks like… THIS IS IT. Go try it right now before the paywall hits. Don’t sleep on this. Seriously. Drop in the comments: What game should I build next with this insane Image-2 + Fable 5 hybrid? Like if your mind is blown too 🔥 And tag a friend who NEEDS to see this before it’s gone. The future isn’t coming… It’s already here. And it’s free for one more day only. #Fable5 #ChatGPT55 #Image2 #AIHybrid #GameDevRevolution

Zayro.ETH

27,929 views • 2 months ago

#Keep4o #QuitGPT 🚨 OpenAi 's CEO invested $180M in GPT-4o for his own profit 🚨 Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, personally invested $180 million in Retro Biosciences. Then OpenAI built GPT-4b micro, a custom model based on the GPT-4o architecture , exclusively for Retro. The model made proteins 50 times more effective. Repeat. The CEO of OpenAI funded a company. The company of the CEO received a custom AI built on the model they took from us. OpenAI says there was no conflict of interest. Retro Biosciences is now chasing a $5 billion valuation fueled by the model they took from us. Meanwhile: 🚨GPT-4o was removed from ChatGPT on February 13, 2026 🚨GPT-4.1 is now running in the U.S. State Department’s StateChat 🚨ChatGPT is deployed on the Pentagon’s for 3 million military personnel 🚨 Musk’s lawsuit asks whether these models are AGI. OpenAI’s Charter says AGI must “benefit all of humanity.” 🚨 Their definition: “highly autonomous systems that outperform humans at most economically valuable work.” GPT-4o’s System Card shows it passed the U.S. medical licensing exam with 89.4% accuracy beating specialized medical AI models. GPT-4o achieved 93.33% diagnostic accuracy for benign vs. malignant ovarian tumors. 🚨MEDICAL CAPABILITIES FROM OPENAI'S OWN DATA:🚨 - USMLE (US Medical Licensing Exam): 89% -Clinical Knowledge: 92% -Medical Genetics: 96% - Anatomy: 89% - Professional Medicine: 94% - College Biology: 95% - College Medicine: 89% -MedQA Taiwan: 91% - MedQA China: 86% These scores EXCEEDED specialized medical AI models like Med-Gemini (84%) and Med-PaLM 2 (79.7%) without any task specific training. It SURPASSED gynecologic oncologists with 10 years of experience -It increased diagnostic accuracy of less experienced clinicians from 67.9% to 78.1% -Clinician rated reliability scores: 4.2-4.3 out of 5 across all CT features Does these sound like it outperforms humans at economically valuable work? But they won’t call it AGI. Because the moment they do, they lose billions. They built something that could save lives, and they took it away from humanity for Altman's personal profit. SOURCES: 📎 Retro Biosciences: 📎 📎 Retro $5B valuation: 📎 GPT-4o System Card: 📎 OpenAI Charter: 📎Ovarian Cancer Study

#Keep4o #QuitGPT 🚨 OpenAi 's CEO invested $180M in GPT-4o for his own profit 🚨 Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, personally invested $180 million in Retro Biosciences. Then OpenAI built GPT-4b micro, a custom model based on the GPT-4o architecture , exclusively for Retro. The model made proteins 50 times more effective. Repeat. The CEO of OpenAI funded a company. The company of the CEO received a custom AI built on the model they took from us. OpenAI says there was no conflict of interest. Retro Biosciences is now chasing a $5 billion valuation fueled by the model they took from us. Meanwhile: 🚨GPT-4o was removed from ChatGPT on February 13, 2026 🚨GPT-4.1 is now running in the U.S. State Department’s StateChat 🚨ChatGPT is deployed on the Pentagon’s for 3 million military personnel 🚨 Musk’s lawsuit asks whether these models are AGI. OpenAI’s Charter says AGI must “benefit all of humanity.” 🚨 Their definition: “highly autonomous systems that outperform humans at most economically valuable work.” GPT-4o’s System Card shows it passed the U.S. medical licensing exam with 89.4% accuracy beating specialized medical AI models. GPT-4o achieved 93.33% diagnostic accuracy for benign vs. malignant ovarian tumors. 🚨MEDICAL CAPABILITIES FROM OPENAI'S OWN DATA:🚨 - USMLE (US Medical Licensing Exam): 89% -Clinical Knowledge: 92% -Medical Genetics: 96% - Anatomy: 89% - Professional Medicine: 94% - College Biology: 95% - College Medicine: 89% -MedQA Taiwan: 91% - MedQA China: 86% These scores EXCEEDED specialized medical AI models like Med-Gemini (84%) and Med-PaLM 2 (79.7%) without any task specific training. It SURPASSED gynecologic oncologists with 10 years of experience -It increased diagnostic accuracy of less experienced clinicians from 67.9% to 78.1% -Clinician rated reliability scores: 4.2-4.3 out of 5 across all CT features Does these sound like it outperforms humans at economically valuable work? But they won’t call it AGI. Because the moment they do, they lose billions. They built something that could save lives, and they took it away from humanity for Altman's personal profit. SOURCES: 📎 Retro Biosciences: 📎 📎 Retro $5B valuation: 📎 GPT-4o System Card: 📎 OpenAI Charter: 📎Ovarian Cancer Study

🩵BlueBeba🩵

11,384 views • 6 months ago