Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Honest Journalist : When lower courts already declared Trump tariffs illegal, why didn't Modi wait for Supreme Court's decision before doing trade deal? 🔥 BJP spokie Pradip Bhandari ran away 😂 Then they call everything a masterstroke 😭

Amock_

76,426 subscribers

42,797 views • 5 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Comedy News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Astonishing economic illiteracy from The White House Journalist, "President Trump is proposing tax hikes in the form of tariffs" Karoline Leavitt, "He's not doing that" Journalist, "Why is he prioritising tariffs over tax cuts?" Karoline Leavitt, "Tariffs are a tax hike on foreign countries that have been ripping us off. Tariffs are a tax cut for the American people" Journalist, "Have you ever paid a tariff? Because I have. They don't get charged on foreign companies, they get charged on importers" Karoline Leavitt, "When we have fair and balanced trade which the American people have not seen in decades, revenues will stay here, wages will go up and our country will be made wealthy" "I think it's insulting you're trying to test my knowledge of economics and the decision the President has made" "I now regret giving a question to the Associated Press"

Astonishing economic illiteracy from The White House Journalist, "President Trump is proposing tax hikes in the form of tariffs" Karoline Leavitt, "He's not doing that" Journalist, "Why is he prioritising tariffs over tax cuts?" Karoline Leavitt, "Tariffs are a tax hike on foreign countries that have been ripping us off. Tariffs are a tax cut for the American people" Journalist, "Have you ever paid a tariff? Because I have. They don't get charged on foreign companies, they get charged on importers" Karoline Leavitt, "When we have fair and balanced trade which the American people have not seen in decades, revenues will stay here, wages will go up and our country will be made wealthy" "I think it's insulting you're trying to test my knowledge of economics and the decision the President has made" "I now regret giving a question to the Associated Press"

Farrukh

87,272 views • 1 year ago

Carney is getting absolutely played, AS USUAL by non other than TRUMP! While Mexico is already deep into formal trade talks with Trump on autos, steel, agriculture and security, Carney is still doing the “we’re open to conversations” dance. The guy in this video nails it. Carney’s apparent strategy? Drag this out. Wait for midterms. Hope Republicans lose the House and Senate so Trump is forced to give Canada a softer deal later. Problem is… Trump knows the game. He’s not waiting until November or January. He’s going to drain the clock, keep the pressure on with tariffs, and force a deal on his terms — probably by September. Then Trump walks away with the big win he desperately needs heading into midterms, while Carney hands him the photo op and the headline. Ontario is already getting crushed. The rest of Canada will feel it next. This is what happens when you elect a globalist banker who thinks he can out-wait Trump. We’re not at the table. We’re on the menu. #cdnpoli #CUSMA #CarneyFail #TradeDeal

Carney is getting absolutely played, AS USUAL by non other than TRUMP! While Mexico is already deep into formal trade talks with Trump on autos, steel, agriculture and security, Carney is still doing the “we’re open to conversations” dance. The guy in this video nails it. Carney’s apparent strategy? Drag this out. Wait for midterms. Hope Republicans lose the House and Senate so Trump is forced to give Canada a softer deal later. Problem is… Trump knows the game. He’s not waiting until November or January. He’s going to drain the clock, keep the pressure on with tariffs, and force a deal on his terms — probably by September. Then Trump walks away with the big win he desperately needs heading into midterms, while Carney hands him the photo op and the headline. Ontario is already getting crushed. The rest of Canada will feel it next. This is what happens when you elect a globalist banker who thinks he can out-wait Trump. We’re not at the table. We’re on the menu. #cdnpoli #CUSMA #CarneyFail #TradeDeal

JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦

13,517 views • 14 days ago

🚨 HOLY CRAP: SCOTUS Decision Could WIPE OUT Billions in US Gains, NULLIFY Trump's Deals, Force US To Pay Back TRILLIONS in Tariffs – Economy SHATTERED, Chaos Ensues! 😤 Folks, that lower appeals court ruling against Trump's tariffs (7-4 decision) is a FULL-BLOWN ASSAULT on America's sovereignty and economy! If SCOTUS doesn't step up and overturn this nonsense, we're headed for TOTAL CATASTROPHE. WHY THIS IS MASSIVE: 🔴Billions in Tariff Revenue VANISH: We'd have to REFUND every single penny collected from countries like China – that's OUR hard-earned money disappearing, hammering the Treasury! 🔴 Trade Deals in TATTERS: All those epic deals Trump locked in? Gone in a flash. This creates massive uncertainty, weakens our global stance, and leaves us vulnerable! 🔴 Investments CRASH: Billions poured into US factories, jobs, and growth thanks to these tariffs – if they're ruled illegal, everything collapses. Markets will PLUMMET, businesses bolt, and we're screwed! ‼️ This is flat-out ECONOMIC SABOTAGE! Businesses are already in panic mode, and while gas prices are low now, this could flip everything upside down. Midterms? This swings it all. And get this – President Trump echoed this EXACT SAME WARNING in his press conference YESTERDAY: "If you took away tariffs, we could end up being a third world country. It will be devastation for our country!" He slammed how "we'd be forced to cough up TRILLIONS to foreign nations that have been ripping us off for decades!" Thanks to tariffs, we've pulled in $17 TRILLION in investments, leading the world in AI, and firing up the HOTTEST economy on Earth. But this liberal court ruling is already TANKING the stock market – "Our country is in serious, serious trouble without tariffs!" Trump's battling back with an EXPEDITED Supreme Court appeal – our LAST LINE OF DEFENSE to save the tariffs and America's future! Supreme Court: DO YOUR DUTY. Uphold the President's power to shield us with tariffs. Share if you stand with Trump – WAKE UP before it's too late! 🔥

🚨 HOLY CRAP: SCOTUS Decision Could WIPE OUT Billions in US Gains, NULLIFY Trump's Deals, Force US To Pay Back TRILLIONS in Tariffs – Economy SHATTERED, Chaos Ensues! 😤 Folks, that lower appeals court ruling against Trump's tariffs (7-4 decision) is a FULL-BLOWN ASSAULT on America's sovereignty and economy! If SCOTUS doesn't step up and overturn this nonsense, we're headed for TOTAL CATASTROPHE. WHY THIS IS MASSIVE: 🔴Billions in Tariff Revenue VANISH: We'd have to REFUND every single penny collected from countries like China – that's OUR hard-earned money disappearing, hammering the Treasury! 🔴 Trade Deals in TATTERS: All those epic deals Trump locked in? Gone in a flash. This creates massive uncertainty, weakens our global stance, and leaves us vulnerable! 🔴 Investments CRASH: Billions poured into US factories, jobs, and growth thanks to these tariffs – if they're ruled illegal, everything collapses. Markets will PLUMMET, businesses bolt, and we're screwed! ‼️ This is flat-out ECONOMIC SABOTAGE! Businesses are already in panic mode, and while gas prices are low now, this could flip everything upside down. Midterms? This swings it all. And get this – President Trump echoed this EXACT SAME WARNING in his press conference YESTERDAY: "If you took away tariffs, we could end up being a third world country. It will be devastation for our country!" He slammed how "we'd be forced to cough up TRILLIONS to foreign nations that have been ripping us off for decades!" Thanks to tariffs, we've pulled in $17 TRILLION in investments, leading the world in AI, and firing up the HOTTEST economy on Earth. But this liberal court ruling is already TANKING the stock market – "Our country is in serious, serious trouble without tariffs!" Trump's battling back with an EXPEDITED Supreme Court appeal – our LAST LINE OF DEFENSE to save the tariffs and America's future! Supreme Court: DO YOUR DUTY. Uphold the President's power to shield us with tariffs. Share if you stand with Trump – WAKE UP before it's too late! 🔥

Project Constitution

32,494 views • 11 months ago

Dan Albas (Dan Albas) came with facts: C-SPAN, a major Canadian shipbuilder, says it can’t compete because of red tape and high taxes. So what does Chrystia Freeland say? She pivots. Of course she does. Not to policy. Not to solutions. She blames you. “Well, Canadian workers earn more.” Translation: We made it impossible to build here, so we’re paying the Chinese Communist Party instead. She dodged questions about the industrial carbon tax strangling industry. She bragged about “rewiring supply chains,” but couldn’t explain why this deal bypasses her own steel tariffs. She blamed BC Ferries, the Infrastructure Bank, basically anyone but herself then promised another roundtable meeting. More talk. No action. This is what Liberal incompetence looks like: They punish Canadian producers, then call them uncompetitive. They slap tariffs on Chinese steel, then approve a deal full of it. They warn about Trump tariffs, then do nothing until they’re called to committee. Chrystia Freeland didn’t defend Canadian workers she outsourced them. And when pressed on it? She smirked, filibustered, and ran for cover.

Dan Albas (Dan Albas) came with facts: C-SPAN, a major Canadian shipbuilder, says it can’t compete because of red tape and high taxes. So what does Chrystia Freeland say? She pivots. Of course she does. Not to policy. Not to solutions. She blames you. “Well, Canadian workers earn more.” Translation: We made it impossible to build here, so we’re paying the Chinese Communist Party instead. She dodged questions about the industrial carbon tax strangling industry. She bragged about “rewiring supply chains,” but couldn’t explain why this deal bypasses her own steel tariffs. She blamed BC Ferries, the Infrastructure Bank, basically anyone but herself then promised another roundtable meeting. More talk. No action. This is what Liberal incompetence looks like: They punish Canadian producers, then call them uncompetitive. They slap tariffs on Chinese steel, then approve a deal full of it. They warn about Trump tariffs, then do nothing until they’re called to committee. Chrystia Freeland didn’t defend Canadian workers she outsourced them. And when pressed on it? She smirked, filibustered, and ran for cover.

Dan Knight

38,729 views • 1 year ago

🚨HOLY CRAP: SCOTUS Decision Could WIPE OUT Billions in US Gains, NULLIFY Trump's Deals, Force US To Pay Back TRILLIONS in Tariffs – Economy SHATTERED, Chaos Ensues! 😤 Folks, the lower appeals court ruling on Trump's Tariffs – it's a FULL-BLOWN THREAT to America's sovereignty and economy! If the SCOTUS lacks the spine to overturn that bogus lower court ruling (7-4 against Trump's tariffs), we're staring down CATASTROPHIC damage. HERE IS WHY THIS IS HUGE: 🔴Billions in Tariff Revenue GONE: We'd have to REFUND every penny collected from countries like China. That's OUR money vanishing into thin air – irreparable hit to the Treasury! 🔴Trade Deals in LIMBO: All those hard-fought deals Trump negotiated? Poof! Null and void. Uncertainty will CRIPPLE negotiations and leave us WEAK on the global stage. 🔴Investments EVAPORATE: Companies poured BILLIONS into the US because of these tariffs – think factories, jobs, growth! If ruled illegal, those deals collapse overnight. Markets will ROIL, businesses flee, and we're left holding the bag. ‼️This Would Be ECONOMIC SABOTAGE! Businesses big and small are already freaking out. Gas prices might be down now, but wait till this mess hits. Midterms? This could swing EVERYTHING. Supreme Court: DO THE RIGHT THING. Uphold the President's constitutional power to protect America with tariffs. Our future depends on it! 🚨

🚨HOLY CRAP: SCOTUS Decision Could WIPE OUT Billions in US Gains, NULLIFY Trump's Deals, Force US To Pay Back TRILLIONS in Tariffs – Economy SHATTERED, Chaos Ensues! 😤 Folks, the lower appeals court ruling on Trump's Tariffs – it's a FULL-BLOWN THREAT to America's sovereignty and economy! If the SCOTUS lacks the spine to overturn that bogus lower court ruling (7-4 against Trump's tariffs), we're staring down CATASTROPHIC damage. HERE IS WHY THIS IS HUGE: 🔴Billions in Tariff Revenue GONE: We'd have to REFUND every penny collected from countries like China. That's OUR money vanishing into thin air – irreparable hit to the Treasury! 🔴Trade Deals in LIMBO: All those hard-fought deals Trump negotiated? Poof! Null and void. Uncertainty will CRIPPLE negotiations and leave us WEAK on the global stage. 🔴Investments EVAPORATE: Companies poured BILLIONS into the US because of these tariffs – think factories, jobs, growth! If ruled illegal, those deals collapse overnight. Markets will ROIL, businesses flee, and we're left holding the bag. ‼️This Would Be ECONOMIC SABOTAGE! Businesses big and small are already freaking out. Gas prices might be down now, but wait till this mess hits. Midterms? This could swing EVERYTHING. Supreme Court: DO THE RIGHT THING. Uphold the President's constitutional power to protect America with tariffs. Our future depends on it! 🚨

Project Constitution

453,576 views • 11 months ago

"if you woke up and saw missed calls from all the red velvet members, who’d you call back first?" wendy: yerimie. she is the most impatient, she'd probably the first to nag 😂😂😂 👥: then who is next? wendy: next is.... i only can think about yerimie. because she'd be like "what were you doing? why didn't you pick up?", and i'd say "i was doing this" and she'd be like "you never answer! never answer!", so i think should calm her down first, even though she doesn't really need it but because of my personality, i think i need to do that. so when she picked up the call, i'd immediately be like "yerim-ah~, i was doing smtg.. did you call~?" 😆 wendy: for the other members, i'd usually send a text first. like "i was doing smtg so i couldn't answer, why were you calling?", because they might be working, so they can't pick up right away. if there's a missed call, i always ask if they are free. to seulgi, i'd ask "can you talk now? are you free to talk now?" 💞

"if you woke up and saw missed calls from all the red velvet members, who’d you call back first?" wendy: yerimie. she is the most impatient, she'd probably the first to nag 😂😂😂 👥: then who is next? wendy: next is.... i only can think about yerimie. because she'd be like "what were you doing? why didn't you pick up?", and i'd say "i was doing this" and she'd be like "you never answer! never answer!", so i think should calm her down first, even though she doesn't really need it but because of my personality, i think i need to do that. so when she picked up the call, i'd immediately be like "yerim-ah~, i was doing smtg.. did you call~?" 😆 wendy: for the other members, i'd usually send a text first. like "i was doing smtg so i couldn't answer, why were you calling?", because they might be working, so they can't pick up right away. if there's a missed call, i always ask if they are free. to seulgi, i'd ask "can you talk now? are you free to talk now?" 💞

슬린

538,061 views • 9 months ago

President Trump wasn’t having it after a European reporter tried to argue that the Iran conflict has become a “strategic dead end” for the United States. Trump completely completely dismantles his entire premise. REPORTER: “The Iran war seems to be a strategic dead end for you. Why are you apparently unable to end the Iran war?” TRUMP: “So I think we’re doing just the opposite.” “The Iran war has been a tremendous military success.” “And, you know, I can only answer the question by saying they’re not going to have a nuclear weapon.” “I was there for one reason, that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. I call it… denuclearize Iran, and that’s happened. They will never have a nuclear weapon.” “That stuff is so far down under a mountain. It’s a granite mountain that collapsed on top of it. It’ll take months to get it out. I think it’s a tremendous success.” “And you see the oil prices are lower than they were when I started.” “They have no military left. Their air force is gone. Their ships are gone. Their radar is gone. Everything’s gone.” “So when you say not a success, it’s a tremendous success.” “The fake news likes to say how well they’re doing. They’re doing terribly.” “They want to make a deal, but they don’t know how to make a deal. And then they go around shooting ships at night. I don’t like that.”

President Trump wasn’t having it after a European reporter tried to argue that the Iran conflict has become a “strategic dead end” for the United States. Trump completely completely dismantles his entire premise. REPORTER: “The Iran war seems to be a strategic dead end for you. Why are you apparently unable to end the Iran war?” TRUMP: “So I think we’re doing just the opposite.” “The Iran war has been a tremendous military success.” “And, you know, I can only answer the question by saying they’re not going to have a nuclear weapon.” “I was there for one reason, that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. I call it… denuclearize Iran, and that’s happened. They will never have a nuclear weapon.” “That stuff is so far down under a mountain. It’s a granite mountain that collapsed on top of it. It’ll take months to get it out. I think it’s a tremendous success.” “And you see the oil prices are lower than they were when I started.” “They have no military left. Their air force is gone. Their ships are gone. Their radar is gone. Everything’s gone.” “So when you say not a success, it’s a tremendous success.” “The fake news likes to say how well they’re doing. They’re doing terribly.” “They want to make a deal, but they don’t know how to make a deal. And then they go around shooting ships at night. I don’t like that.”

Overton

265,903 views • 27 days ago

Jagdeep was 'Gayab' after resigning (reportedly for conspiring against Modi Sarkar) & then popped up suddenly for a faltu book launch 'Hum Aur Yah Vishwa’. Intrigued by this I checked author & everything started falling in place. Author is Manmohan Vaidya, Joint Gen Sec of RSS...most influential post after RSS Chief Mohan Bhagwat. Manmohan Vaidya has interesting track record. PM Modi Ji was declared BJP's PM Candidate on 12 Sept 2013. But Vaidya was already feeling too bad about it since long time before that. Some of his interesting statements👇 -"The Sangh is not in favour of any personality cult. BJP should decide its leader through consensus, not by promoting individuals." -"BJP should not name a prime ministerial candidate prematurely and that the victory in Gujarat was a collective effort, not just about an individual." -"To discuss BJP's prime ministerial candidate after Gujarat assembly elections is both premature and irrelevant. Gujarat assembly elections weren't fought for this purpose." -"Modi is only one among the many prime ministerial candidates in the BJP." -"Gujarat chief minister's candidature would work to the advantage of BJP's rivals." Interestingly, some of these statements were made during September 7-9, 2013 to be specific. Before 12 Sept 2013, there was also a meeting held b/w RSS & BJP after 'some' BJP leaders who didn't want Modi Ji’s name to be declared as PM Candidate, went to RSS for intervention. Manmohan Vaidya was more than enthusiastic to issue a statement that time too. “This meeting was not held to take a decision [on the PM candidate]. I will not say this here.” (When pressed on Modi specifically.) He added that the RSS had shared its "feelings" but left the call to the BJP. Fortunately, BJP took the 'right' call & Modi Ji was declared as PM candidate DEFYING 'Suggestions' from RSS. We must always remain indebted to late-Arun Jaitley Sir, Rajnath Singh Ji & late-Manohar Parrikar Ji for making this possible and change Bharat's destiny forever. But Manmohan Vaidya didn't seem to be very happy even after BJP winning LS with full majority on its own & continued making statements which could hurt BJP. Everyone knows 'road to Delhi' passes through UP. Winning UP Assembly in 2017 was of utmost importance for BJP before 2019 LS Elections and Manmohan Vaidya strikes again...Vaidya kicked up a controversy by suggesting a review of the reservation policy just before Assembly Election. That one statement was enough to wipe out BJP from UP forever (it wasn't in power in UP since 25 yrs already) & with it 2019 LS also. But fortunately, BJP worked in overdrive to clear the confusion. Mounting pressure forced Vaidya to issue clarification. Hats off to UP RSS unit which knew importance & desperation to win UP. Add to it meticulous planning of Amit Shah Ji & BJP stormed to power with Brute Majority to open roads for 2019 LS also. So Jagdeep attending book launch of 'this' person solved a big puzzle. And...inspite of working so hard, Vaidya has not been able to get his 'favourite' person in PM's Chair. Ps- I'm not denying RSS's contribution to Nation & Society. It is still the most dedicated orgañ to Society & Nation. Ideology hasn't changed, but people have. And sadly...people run orgñ. RSS is the same, Maybe people running it are not! RSS devouts will not like me writing this & will come pouncing on me. But I can see from a neutral PoV what a RSS affiliate can't, because.... I'm neither from RSS or BJP....I'm devoted ONLY & ONLY to Modi-Shah Ji & 'that's why' to BJP. So any criticism can't stop me from writing my opinion.

Jagdeep was 'Gayab' after resigning (reportedly for conspiring against Modi Sarkar) & then popped up suddenly for a faltu book launch 'Hum Aur Yah Vishwa’. Intrigued by this I checked author & everything started falling in place. Author is Manmohan Vaidya, Joint Gen Sec of RSS...most influential post after RSS Chief Mohan Bhagwat. Manmohan Vaidya has interesting track record. PM Modi Ji was declared BJP's PM Candidate on 12 Sept 2013. But Vaidya was already feeling too bad about it since long time before that. Some of his interesting statements👇 -"The Sangh is not in favour of any personality cult. BJP should decide its leader through consensus, not by promoting individuals." -"BJP should not name a prime ministerial candidate prematurely and that the victory in Gujarat was a collective effort, not just about an individual." -"To discuss BJP's prime ministerial candidate after Gujarat assembly elections is both premature and irrelevant. Gujarat assembly elections weren't fought for this purpose." -"Modi is only one among the many prime ministerial candidates in the BJP." -"Gujarat chief minister's candidature would work to the advantage of BJP's rivals." Interestingly, some of these statements were made during September 7-9, 2013 to be specific. Before 12 Sept 2013, there was also a meeting held b/w RSS & BJP after 'some' BJP leaders who didn't want Modi Ji’s name to be declared as PM Candidate, went to RSS for intervention. Manmohan Vaidya was more than enthusiastic to issue a statement that time too. “This meeting was not held to take a decision [on the PM candidate]. I will not say this here.” (When pressed on Modi specifically.) He added that the RSS had shared its "feelings" but left the call to the BJP. Fortunately, BJP took the 'right' call & Modi Ji was declared as PM candidate DEFYING 'Suggestions' from RSS. We must always remain indebted to late-Arun Jaitley Sir, Rajnath Singh Ji & late-Manohar Parrikar Ji for making this possible and change Bharat's destiny forever. But Manmohan Vaidya didn't seem to be very happy even after BJP winning LS with full majority on its own & continued making statements which could hurt BJP. Everyone knows 'road to Delhi' passes through UP. Winning UP Assembly in 2017 was of utmost importance for BJP before 2019 LS Elections and Manmohan Vaidya strikes again...Vaidya kicked up a controversy by suggesting a review of the reservation policy just before Assembly Election. That one statement was enough to wipe out BJP from UP forever (it wasn't in power in UP since 25 yrs already) & with it 2019 LS also. But fortunately, BJP worked in overdrive to clear the confusion. Mounting pressure forced Vaidya to issue clarification. Hats off to UP RSS unit which knew importance & desperation to win UP. Add to it meticulous planning of Amit Shah Ji & BJP stormed to power with Brute Majority to open roads for 2019 LS also. So Jagdeep attending book launch of 'this' person solved a big puzzle. And...inspite of working so hard, Vaidya has not been able to get his 'favourite' person in PM's Chair. Ps- I'm not denying RSS's contribution to Nation & Society. It is still the most dedicated orgañ to Society & Nation. Ideology hasn't changed, but people have. And sadly...people run orgñ. RSS is the same, Maybe people running it are not! RSS devouts will not like me writing this & will come pouncing on me. But I can see from a neutral PoV what a RSS affiliate can't, because.... I'm neither from RSS or BJP....I'm devoted ONLY & ONLY to Modi-Shah Ji & 'that's why' to BJP. So any criticism can't stop me from writing my opinion.

BhikuMhatre

221,474 views • 8 months ago

Trump just gave away the whole game in one messy, rambling brain fart.🇺🇸💨 Let’s rip it apart: 1. “Russia wants a deal.” No shit they do — because every “deal” Trump dreams up is a surrender wrapped in a ribbon. Putin doesn’t want a deal — Putin wants Ukraine neutered, NATO shattered, and Europe scared shitless. That’s not a deal — that’s a ransom note. 2. “I gave Ukraine Javelins!” Yeah, after Congress forced your hand. You held that aid hostage to blackmail Zelenskyy into digging dirt on Biden’s kid. That’s not helping — that’s extortion. And when you brag about “Javelins,” remember — those were defensive weapons. You blocked anything offensive that could actually hit Russians back. 3. “Russia took nothing under Trump.” No, genius — they didn’t need to. You spent four years licking Putin’s boots and wrecking NATO from the inside. Why invade when your idiot friend is already doing the job for free? Russia gained time, influence, and your loyalty — which is worth more than Crimea to them. 4. “We need a deal.” Translation: We need to sell Ukraine out, pretend it’s peace, and go back to Trump Tower sucking Russian oligarch cash through a golden straw. That’s not diplomacy — that’s a fire sale of freedom. 5. “Under Trump, Russia got nothing.” Under Trump, Russia got everything they wanted but tanks on Kyiv’s streets. They got a broken U.S.-Europe alliance, chaos in NATO, weakened sanctions, and a MAGA cult parroting Kremlin propaganda every damn day. That’s the greatest Russian victory since the Berlin Wall fell. This whole statement is projection, lies, and insecurity wrapped into one steaming pile. Trump didn’t stop Putin — Trump WAS Putin’s weapon. And now, they both want “peace,” meaning Ukraine surrenders, Europe bends over, and America kisses the Kremlin ring. That’s the “deal.” That’s the truth. That’s the sellout happening in real time.

Trump just gave away the whole game in one messy, rambling brain fart.🇺🇸💨 Let’s rip it apart: 1. “Russia wants a deal.” No shit they do — because every “deal” Trump dreams up is a surrender wrapped in a ribbon. Putin doesn’t want a deal — Putin wants Ukraine neutered, NATO shattered, and Europe scared shitless. That’s not a deal — that’s a ransom note. 2. “I gave Ukraine Javelins!” Yeah, after Congress forced your hand. You held that aid hostage to blackmail Zelenskyy into digging dirt on Biden’s kid. That’s not helping — that’s extortion. And when you brag about “Javelins,” remember — those were defensive weapons. You blocked anything offensive that could actually hit Russians back. 3. “Russia took nothing under Trump.” No, genius — they didn’t need to. You spent four years licking Putin’s boots and wrecking NATO from the inside. Why invade when your idiot friend is already doing the job for free? Russia gained time, influence, and your loyalty — which is worth more than Crimea to them. 4. “We need a deal.” Translation: We need to sell Ukraine out, pretend it’s peace, and go back to Trump Tower sucking Russian oligarch cash through a golden straw. That’s not diplomacy — that’s a fire sale of freedom. 5. “Under Trump, Russia got nothing.” Under Trump, Russia got everything they wanted but tanks on Kyiv’s streets. They got a broken U.S.-Europe alliance, chaos in NATO, weakened sanctions, and a MAGA cult parroting Kremlin propaganda every damn day. That’s the greatest Russian victory since the Berlin Wall fell. This whole statement is projection, lies, and insecurity wrapped into one steaming pile. Trump didn’t stop Putin — Trump WAS Putin’s weapon. And now, they both want “peace,” meaning Ukraine surrenders, Europe bends over, and America kisses the Kremlin ring. That’s the “deal.” That’s the truth. That’s the sellout happening in real time.

Mario

1,869,225 views • 1 year ago

🚨 $SPCX LOOKS EXACTLY LIKE $NVDA AND $TSLA BEFORE THEIR BIGGEST MOVES Most people see a failed IPO. That's exactly what they said about both of them Nvidia - 1999 IPO, pumped 7x on dot-com hype, crashed 80% while retail walked away. Institutions loaded in silence - then Nvidia ran 50x from the bottom before anyone noticed Tesla - 2010 IPO at $17, pumped to $30, fell back below IPO price within a week. Flat for two years, retail wrote it off - then 8x in 14 months and 300x today $SPCX just gave you the same sequence: IPO pump to $225, flush to $150, retail already considering it dead That's not a failed trade - that's the setup Institutions don't announce when they're loading, but the chart tells you everything: low volatility, tight range, no headlines That's exactly the moment to buy it Follow + notifs on, I will keep you updated

🚨 $SPCX LOOKS EXACTLY LIKE $NVDA AND $TSLA BEFORE THEIR BIGGEST MOVES Most people see a failed IPO. That's exactly what they said about both of them Nvidia - 1999 IPO, pumped 7x on dot-com hype, crashed 80% while retail walked away. Institutions loaded in silence - then Nvidia ran 50x from the bottom before anyone noticed Tesla - 2010 IPO at $17, pumped to $30, fell back below IPO price within a week. Flat for two years, retail wrote it off - then 8x in 14 months and 300x today $SPCX just gave you the same sequence: IPO pump to $225, flush to $150, retail already considering it dead That's not a failed trade - that's the setup Institutions don't announce when they're loading, but the chart tells you everything: low volatility, tight range, no headlines That's exactly the moment to buy it Follow + notifs on, I will keep you updated

Pepesso

79,745 views • 1 month ago

⭕️ Trump on Iran Talks: “They Can Call Me. We Have All the Cards.” President Trump told reporters Saturday he canceled plans to send U.S. envoys to Pakistan for potential Iran talks, hardening his stance as Tehran holds firm on core demands. The Iranian delegation had already left Pakistan before the announcement. 🔹 On canceling the planned visit: “There’s no reason to wait two days, have people traveling for 16, 17 hours… we’re not doing it that way. We’ll do it when they want. They can call me.” 🔹 On what changed: Iran sent a proposal he called insufficient. “They gave us a paper that should have been better. And interestingly, immediately when I canceled it, within 10 minutes, we got a new paper that was much better.” 🔹 On Iran’s leadership: “We knocked out two levels of leaders. They don’t know who’s in charge. They’re probably fighting not to be the leader.” He added: “I’ll deal with whoever runs the show.” 🔹 On Pakistan’s role as mediator: “Pakistan is terrific. The field marshal is fantastic.” But said U.S. envoys would not be “traveling 15, 16 hours to have a meeting with people that nobody ever heard of.” 🔹 On his core demand: “Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. Very simple. That whole deal is not complicated.” 🔹 On Iran’s counteroffer: Asked what Iran offered in return, Trump said: “They offered a lot — but not enough.”

⭕️ Trump on Iran Talks: “They Can Call Me. We Have All the Cards.” President Trump told reporters Saturday he canceled plans to send U.S. envoys to Pakistan for potential Iran talks, hardening his stance as Tehran holds firm on core demands. The Iranian delegation had already left Pakistan before the announcement. 🔹 On canceling the planned visit: “There’s no reason to wait two days, have people traveling for 16, 17 hours… we’re not doing it that way. We’ll do it when they want. They can call me.” 🔹 On what changed: Iran sent a proposal he called insufficient. “They gave us a paper that should have been better. And interestingly, immediately when I canceled it, within 10 minutes, we got a new paper that was much better.” 🔹 On Iran’s leadership: “We knocked out two levels of leaders. They don’t know who’s in charge. They’re probably fighting not to be the leader.” He added: “I’ll deal with whoever runs the show.” 🔹 On Pakistan’s role as mediator: “Pakistan is terrific. The field marshal is fantastic.” But said U.S. envoys would not be “traveling 15, 16 hours to have a meeting with people that nobody ever heard of.” 🔹 On his core demand: “Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. Very simple. That whole deal is not complicated.” 🔹 On Iran’s counteroffer: Asked what Iran offered in return, Trump said: “They offered a lot — but not enough.”

Drop Site

24,164 views • 3 months ago

Trump just pulled off one of the smartest dealmaking moves in tech history. And Nvidia + China are both getting played. Let me explain... December 2025: Trump announces Nvidia can sell H200 chips to China. BUT the US government takes 25% of every sale. Not a 25% tariff. 25% OF THE REVENUE goes to US Treasury. Jensen Huang celebrates. Stock rallies. January 14, 2026: Commerce Department publishes the REAL terms. Chips manufactured in Taiwan have to TRANSIT through the US for "third-party verification." When they enter US soil? 25% tariff gets applied. So Nvidia pays 25% tariff to import their own chips. THEN Trump takes 25% of the sale price when they ship to China. Nvidia's getting hit TWICE. The math is crazy: H200 costs $30k to make. Nvidia sells for $50k. 25% tariff entering US = $10k to government 25% of sale to China = $12.5k to government Total to US: $22.5k per chip Nvidia's margin: Drops from 70%+ to maybe 15% Chinese companies ordered 2 MILLION H200 chips for 2026. But Nvidia only has 700,000 in inventory. $22,500 × 700,000 chips = $15.75 BILLION to US Treasury. From ONE deal. With ONE company. Now here's where it gets insane... China isn't actually approving these imports. Chinese state media called H200 chips "unsafe." Cyberspace Administration is blocking purchases except for "exceptional circumstances." So Trump negotiated a deal where: - Nvidia thinks they're getting China market access - China's government is quietly blocking the imports anyway - US Treasury collects billions on the few that do get through - Trump gets to claim he's "tough on China" AND "supporting American business" This move kinda makes sense if you think about it. Supreme Court is about to rule Trump's IEEPA tariffs are illegal. That's the $130 billion refund bomb. Trump needs NEW revenue sources to replace tariff income when that ruling drops. So he invents a completely new structure: Not a tariff (court can't overturn). A "licensing fee" (executive authority). On chips that are "national security sensitive" (unchallengeable). This is the blueprint for Tariffs 2.0. When Supreme Court kills IEEPA authority Trump just pivots to "licensing fees" on every strategic export. Can't challenge it as a tariff because it's not a tariff. It's a "condition of export approval." The semiconductor industry just became Trump's test case. And Nvidia walked right into it because Jensen spent 6 months lobbying for "market access." Meanwhile China's playing the long game: They're not approving H200 imports. They're forcing their companies to use domestic chips (inferior but improving). Accelerating DeepSeek-style efficiency research. Building AI models that work on weaker hardware. In 2-3 years, when Chinese chips catch up, they won't need Nvidia at all. And Trump's "$15.75 billion windfall" becomes $0. But by then he'll have established the legal framework to extract licensing fees from every other strategic export. Everyone thinks Trump's negotiating strategy is "chaos." But look at what he actually accomplished: Created legal precedent for non-tariff trade fees that survive Supreme Court challenges. That's not chaos. That's calculated. What happens next: Supreme Court rules (next 2 weeks). Trump loses on IEEPA tariffs. $130B refund chaos begins. Trump immediately announces "licensing fee" structure for 10 other export categories. Uses Nvidia deal as proof it "works." Markets freak out as every exporter realizes their margins are about to get crushed. China continues blocking H200 imports while building domestic alternatives. Nvidia's stock craters when 2026 guidance shows China revenue never materialized. And Trump goes into 2027 with a completely new trade policy framework that's legally unchallengeable. Everybody's focused on the tariffs. Nobody's watching the licensing fees. This is actually genius.

Trump just pulled off one of the smartest dealmaking moves in tech history. And Nvidia + China are both getting played. Let me explain... December 2025: Trump announces Nvidia can sell H200 chips to China. BUT the US government takes 25% of every sale. Not a 25% tariff. 25% OF THE REVENUE goes to US Treasury. Jensen Huang celebrates. Stock rallies. January 14, 2026: Commerce Department publishes the REAL terms. Chips manufactured in Taiwan have to TRANSIT through the US for "third-party verification." When they enter US soil? 25% tariff gets applied. So Nvidia pays 25% tariff to import their own chips. THEN Trump takes 25% of the sale price when they ship to China. Nvidia's getting hit TWICE. The math is crazy: H200 costs $30k to make. Nvidia sells for $50k. 25% tariff entering US = $10k to government 25% of sale to China = $12.5k to government Total to US: $22.5k per chip Nvidia's margin: Drops from 70%+ to maybe 15% Chinese companies ordered 2 MILLION H200 chips for 2026. But Nvidia only has 700,000 in inventory. $22,500 × 700,000 chips = $15.75 BILLION to US Treasury. From ONE deal. With ONE company. Now here's where it gets insane... China isn't actually approving these imports. Chinese state media called H200 chips "unsafe." Cyberspace Administration is blocking purchases except for "exceptional circumstances." So Trump negotiated a deal where: - Nvidia thinks they're getting China market access - China's government is quietly blocking the imports anyway - US Treasury collects billions on the few that do get through - Trump gets to claim he's "tough on China" AND "supporting American business" This move kinda makes sense if you think about it. Supreme Court is about to rule Trump's IEEPA tariffs are illegal. That's the $130 billion refund bomb. Trump needs NEW revenue sources to replace tariff income when that ruling drops. So he invents a completely new structure: Not a tariff (court can't overturn). A "licensing fee" (executive authority). On chips that are "national security sensitive" (unchallengeable). This is the blueprint for Tariffs 2.0. When Supreme Court kills IEEPA authority Trump just pivots to "licensing fees" on every strategic export. Can't challenge it as a tariff because it's not a tariff. It's a "condition of export approval." The semiconductor industry just became Trump's test case. And Nvidia walked right into it because Jensen spent 6 months lobbying for "market access." Meanwhile China's playing the long game: They're not approving H200 imports. They're forcing their companies to use domestic chips (inferior but improving). Accelerating DeepSeek-style efficiency research. Building AI models that work on weaker hardware. In 2-3 years, when Chinese chips catch up, they won't need Nvidia at all. And Trump's "$15.75 billion windfall" becomes $0. But by then he'll have established the legal framework to extract licensing fees from every other strategic export. Everyone thinks Trump's negotiating strategy is "chaos." But look at what he actually accomplished: Created legal precedent for non-tariff trade fees that survive Supreme Court challenges. That's not chaos. That's calculated. What happens next: Supreme Court rules (next 2 weeks). Trump loses on IEEPA tariffs. $130B refund chaos begins. Trump immediately announces "licensing fee" structure for 10 other export categories. Uses Nvidia deal as proof it "works." Markets freak out as every exporter realizes their margins are about to get crushed. China continues blocking H200 imports while building domestic alternatives. Nvidia's stock craters when 2026 guidance shows China revenue never materialized. And Trump goes into 2027 with a completely new trade policy framework that's legally unchallengeable. Everybody's focused on the tariffs. Nobody's watching the licensing fees. This is actually genius.

Ricardo

44,349 views • 6 months ago

That’s when CNN tried to push back—with a question about Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a known MS-13 gangbanger who was deported by the Trump administration. They claimed it was a “mistake.” 🔥 Trump handed it over to Stephen Miller—and Miller dismantled the narrative. “There's an illegal alien from El Salvador. So with respect to you, he's a citizen of El Salvador. So it's very arrogant, even for American media to suggest that we would even tell El Salvador how to handle their own citizens.” He laid out the legal facts: “Two immigration courts found that he was a member of MS-13. When President Trump declared MS-13 to be a foreign terrorist organization, that meant that he was no longer eligible under federal law... He had a deportation order that was valid.” Then came the jaw-dropping legal twist: “A district court judge tried to tell the administration they had to kidnap a citizen of El Salvador and fly him back here.” But the Supreme Court slapped that down: “The Supreme Court said the district court order was unlawful... unanimously stating clearly that neither Secretary of State nor the president could be compelled by anybody to forcibly retrieve a citizen of El Salvador... a member of MS-13.” Trump turned to Miller: “What was the ruling the Supreme Court, Steve? Was it nine to nothing?” Miller confirmed: “Yes, it was a 9-0, in our favor.” Then he delivered the knockout punch: “That is the president of El Salvador. Your questions about, per the court, can only be directed to him.”

That’s when CNN tried to push back—with a question about Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a known MS-13 gangbanger who was deported by the Trump administration. They claimed it was a “mistake.” 🔥 Trump handed it over to Stephen Miller—and Miller dismantled the narrative. “There's an illegal alien from El Salvador. So with respect to you, he's a citizen of El Salvador. So it's very arrogant, even for American media to suggest that we would even tell El Salvador how to handle their own citizens.” He laid out the legal facts: “Two immigration courts found that he was a member of MS-13. When President Trump declared MS-13 to be a foreign terrorist organization, that meant that he was no longer eligible under federal law... He had a deportation order that was valid.” Then came the jaw-dropping legal twist: “A district court judge tried to tell the administration they had to kidnap a citizen of El Salvador and fly him back here.” But the Supreme Court slapped that down: “The Supreme Court said the district court order was unlawful... unanimously stating clearly that neither Secretary of State nor the president could be compelled by anybody to forcibly retrieve a citizen of El Salvador... a member of MS-13.” Trump turned to Miller: “What was the ruling the Supreme Court, Steve? Was it nine to nothing?” Miller confirmed: “Yes, it was a 9-0, in our favor.” Then he delivered the knockout punch: “That is the president of El Salvador. Your questions about, per the court, can only be directed to him.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

623,897 views • 1 year ago

Received a video on Social Media where wife of BJP defeated candidate asks for money back from a voter who didn't vote for him. Is this what democracy looks like? Reading that, in Mancherial's municipal polls, Roopa—wife of defeated BJP candidate Jadi Tirupati—storms into homes demanding voters swear on God they voted for him... or return the ₹3,000! Shameful if this is true 😡 Woman in Purple Saree: Have you voted? Elderly Woman: Yes, I have voted. Woman in Purple Saree: (Points to the elderly woman's finger) See, here it is. Keep it. (She begins writing on her papers). Elderly Woman: I have voted. Woman in Purple Saree: I've noted it down. Man (Off-camera): You should have asked about the pension when you took the money. Elderly Woman: I have voted. Man (Off-camera): If there's any courage, ask about the pension. Ask them why they didn't come when you were in trouble. Woman in Purple Saree: What is your husband's name? Elderly Woman: Maatheri Narasamma. (She seems to be giving her own name or her husband's name). Man (Off-camera): They didn't come when you were in trouble. They didn't call you then. Why are they coming now and begging for votes? Tell them! Elderly Woman: Count these three thousand. (She hands over some money). Woman in Purple Saree: (Takes the money and continues writing) I'll give it back tomorrow. What will you do with it now? Man (Off-camera): If there's any courage, ask them. If you have any courage, ask them. Woman in Purple Saree: What is your husband's name? Man (Off-camera): If there's any courage, ask. Woman in Purple Saree: Why do we need all this talk about courage? Man (Off-camera): Why not? It’s important! Woman in Purple Saree: Why do we need to talk about all that BJP Narendra Modi ji, why is this still happening in India? This poor woman should go viral. She actually returned the money back. If this video is true, then in 24 hours pls take action against the BJP candidate. This is not at all ok. All the work you are doing is getting tarnished like this. As a well wisher, this is not at all ok for our country. Reward this poor woman who had the courage to give back. She needs to go viral. #FI

Received a video on Social Media where wife of BJP defeated candidate asks for money back from a voter who didn't vote for him. Is this what democracy looks like? Reading that, in Mancherial's municipal polls, Roopa—wife of defeated BJP candidate Jadi Tirupati—storms into homes demanding voters swear on God they voted for him... or return the ₹3,000! Shameful if this is true 😡 Woman in Purple Saree: Have you voted? Elderly Woman: Yes, I have voted. Woman in Purple Saree: (Points to the elderly woman's finger) See, here it is. Keep it. (She begins writing on her papers). Elderly Woman: I have voted. Woman in Purple Saree: I've noted it down. Man (Off-camera): You should have asked about the pension when you took the money. Elderly Woman: I have voted. Man (Off-camera): If there's any courage, ask about the pension. Ask them why they didn't come when you were in trouble. Woman in Purple Saree: What is your husband's name? Elderly Woman: Maatheri Narasamma. (She seems to be giving her own name or her husband's name). Man (Off-camera): They didn't come when you were in trouble. They didn't call you then. Why are they coming now and begging for votes? Tell them! Elderly Woman: Count these three thousand. (She hands over some money). Woman in Purple Saree: (Takes the money and continues writing) I'll give it back tomorrow. What will you do with it now? Man (Off-camera): If there's any courage, ask them. If you have any courage, ask them. Woman in Purple Saree: What is your husband's name? Man (Off-camera): If there's any courage, ask. Woman in Purple Saree: Why do we need all this talk about courage? Man (Off-camera): Why not? It’s important! Woman in Purple Saree: Why do we need to talk about all that BJP Narendra Modi ji, why is this still happening in India? This poor woman should go viral. She actually returned the money back. If this video is true, then in 24 hours pls take action against the BJP candidate. This is not at all ok. All the work you are doing is getting tarnished like this. As a well wisher, this is not at all ok for our country. Reward this poor woman who had the courage to give back. She needs to go viral. #FI

Fundamental Investor ™ 🇮🇳

12,167 views • 5 months ago

Harvard has 'been a pox on our educational system at least since the 1920s' -- Something we’ve talked about before, is Harvard has decided to fight because it’s getting cheers within its bubble. But what are they fighting for? They’re fighting for the right to continue to discriminate. They’re fighting for the right to allow hoodlums to run to rampage on the campus harassing Jewish students. This is what they’re fighting for. They’re not fighting for anything that’s worth fighting for. They’ve dug this grave for themselves. Think about it. You say Harvard has been doing this for a long time. I don’t think people realize how long they’ve been doing this. In the 1920s, they invented the quota system for admissions to keep Jews out with the whole person view, I forget what they call it. That whole thing of moving away from objective measures like test scores and considering other things was developed by Harvard in the 1920s to keep the number of Jews lower, to reduce the number of Jews. They have been a pox on our educational system at least since the 1920s. They then took that model that they used against Jews, and used it against Asians and Whites in the affirmative action field. The Harvard model in admissions is exactly what the Supreme Court said was illegal and unlawful, and they’ve been doing it since the 1920s. That’s the Harvard attitude. They think they’re above everybody else. And I went there, so I know it, that that’s the attitude. They truly believe that they know better and they’re immune to accountability, and now they’re finding out otherwise.

Harvard has 'been a pox on our educational system at least since the 1920s' -- Something we’ve talked about before, is Harvard has decided to fight because it’s getting cheers within its bubble. But what are they fighting for? They’re fighting for the right to continue to discriminate. They’re fighting for the right to allow hoodlums to run to rampage on the campus harassing Jewish students. This is what they’re fighting for. They’re not fighting for anything that’s worth fighting for. They’ve dug this grave for themselves. Think about it. You say Harvard has been doing this for a long time. I don’t think people realize how long they’ve been doing this. In the 1920s, they invented the quota system for admissions to keep Jews out with the whole person view, I forget what they call it. That whole thing of moving away from objective measures like test scores and considering other things was developed by Harvard in the 1920s to keep the number of Jews lower, to reduce the number of Jews. They have been a pox on our educational system at least since the 1920s. They then took that model that they used against Jews, and used it against Asians and Whites in the affirmative action field. The Harvard model in admissions is exactly what the Supreme Court said was illegal and unlawful, and they’ve been doing it since the 1920s. That’s the Harvard attitude. They think they’re above everybody else. And I went there, so I know it, that that’s the attitude. They truly believe that they know better and they’re immune to accountability, and now they’re finding out otherwise.

William A. Jacobson

13,906 views • 1 year ago

Deborah Birx (now on Palantir's board): "If you lived in [rural areas], your [COVID] death rate was 3 to 4 times [higher]...[because] they didn't have... remdesivir...you wonder why they used ivermectin—because there wasn't a doctor there. There was only a vet." (1/5) This clip of retired Army colonel Deborah Birx, who was parachuted in to run the Coronavirus Task Force under Trump 1.0 by the National Security Council (see tweet 4) says that Americans living in rural areas died at rates three to four times higher than Americans living in urban areas because they lacked access to testing and remdesivir. Furthermore, she notes that they turned to ivermectin because they didn't have doctors; they had veterinarians. Note that remdesivir is enormously deadly, and it's always been known as enormously deadly (see tweet 2 and 3). In large part because the "antiviral" destroys the liver. Furthermore, note that ivermectin is a Nobel Prize–winning drug that has been administered to *billions* of people over the last couple of decades. (Per sources summoned by Grok—check for yourself.) ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "And when I got pulled back for Covid, I was devastated to see what happened. Long before there was a vaccine, people were dying at higher rates in rural, areas than any other counties in the United States. If you lived in the central valley of California, your death rate was three to four times what the urbans were. And that's because they didn't have the same resources. They didn't have testing, they didn't have remdesivir. Everything that you had in the cities, they didn't have in rural areas. "And I went rural community by rural community. And then you wonder why they used Ivermectin. Because there wasn't a doctor there. There was only a vet. And these. That's how things happen. And we just. And then we're like, oh, my God. And I'm like, yeah, oh, my God. This is on us. This is on us. For the last 40 years, watching this stuff just go away."

Deborah Birx (now on Palantir's board): "If you lived in [rural areas], your [COVID] death rate was 3 to 4 times [higher]...[because] they didn't have... remdesivir...you wonder why they used ivermectin—because there wasn't a doctor there. There was only a vet." (1/5) This clip of retired Army colonel Deborah Birx, who was parachuted in to run the Coronavirus Task Force under Trump 1.0 by the National Security Council (see tweet 4) says that Americans living in rural areas died at rates three to four times higher than Americans living in urban areas because they lacked access to testing and remdesivir. Furthermore, she notes that they turned to ivermectin because they didn't have doctors; they had veterinarians. Note that remdesivir is enormously deadly, and it's always been known as enormously deadly (see tweet 2 and 3). In large part because the "antiviral" destroys the liver. Furthermore, note that ivermectin is a Nobel Prize–winning drug that has been administered to billions of people over the last couple of decades. (Per sources summoned by Grok—check for yourself.) ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "And when I got pulled back for Covid, I was devastated to see what happened. Long before there was a vaccine, people were dying at higher rates in rural, areas than any other counties in the United States. If you lived in the central valley of California, your death rate was three to four times what the urbans were. And that's because they didn't have the same resources. They didn't have testing, they didn't have remdesivir. Everything that you had in the cities, they didn't have in rural areas. "And I went rural community by rural community. And then you wonder why they used Ivermectin. Because there wasn't a doctor there. There was only a vet. And these. That's how things happen. And we just. And then we're like, oh, my God. And I'm like, yeah, oh, my God. This is on us. This is on us. For the last 40 years, watching this stuff just go away."

Sense Receptor

331,661 views • 1 year ago

Women Who’ve Never Cared About Politics Are Voting Donald Trump “People are always like, Maggie, you're a woman. How can you vote for Trump? Let me tell you why. Before 2020, I was apolitical. I did not care. I didn't pay attention to anything. Just being honest. I was living my best life doing van life, having fun. Then I moved back home to Washington during the pandemic. And do you wanna know what Democrats did to me? - It took away my right to teach - It took away my right to go to the gym - It took away my right to go to restaurants - It took away my right to go to restaurants - I took away my right to go to movies Um, this is not an exaggeration. I got upwards of a 1,000 death threats, maybe even more than that, from liberals, all because I didn't do that thing. I was living out in the country, minding my business, not harming anyone, being very respectful to everyone. And, uh, I was treated subhuman. Like, they dehumanized me so much. So I will be voting for the party that values personal liberty and freedom and small government. The right is far more liberal now than the left. The left has become more authoritarian. Like, they're literally installing a presidential candidate right now. They're cheering on shooting their political opponents. Like, a little fascist in my opinion. So Trump's not perfect, but he's a good leader. He has good policies. Um, so, yeah, Trump 2024.”

Women Who’ve Never Cared About Politics Are Voting Donald Trump “People are always like, Maggie, you're a woman. How can you vote for Trump? Let me tell you why. Before 2020, I was apolitical. I did not care. I didn't pay attention to anything. Just being honest. I was living my best life doing van life, having fun. Then I moved back home to Washington during the pandemic. And do you wanna know what Democrats did to me? - It took away my right to teach - It took away my right to go to the gym - It took away my right to go to restaurants - It took away my right to go to restaurants - I took away my right to go to movies Um, this is not an exaggeration. I got upwards of a 1,000 death threats, maybe even more than that, from liberals, all because I didn't do that thing. I was living out in the country, minding my business, not harming anyone, being very respectful to everyone. And, uh, I was treated subhuman. Like, they dehumanized me so much. So I will be voting for the party that values personal liberty and freedom and small government. The right is far more liberal now than the left. The left has become more authoritarian. Like, they're literally installing a presidential candidate right now. They're cheering on shooting their political opponents. Like, a little fascist in my opinion. So Trump's not perfect, but he's a good leader. He has good policies. Um, so, yeah, Trump 2024.”

Wall Street Apes

673,584 views • 2 years ago