Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

How could naturally skeptical journalists like James O'Brien & Krishnan Guru-Murthy be taken in by Jason Arday? They were mesmerised by the tale of a black boy who had overcome adversity It’s the virtue-signalling equivalent of train spotters who get excited seeing the Flying Scotsman For journalists like James... O’Brien & Krishnan Guru-Murthy -- and woke academics in Cambridge and up and down the country -- Arday was their Flying Scotsman. Arday ticked every box: race ✔️ poverty ✔️ neurodivergent ✔️ illiterate ✔️ unorthodox childhood ✔️ He was the virtue signaller’s poster boy. The identity politics bingo card in human form. To see seasoned journalists, trained to detect the faintest whiff of BS, uncritically accept the bold boasts of their interviewee reveals the devastating, mind-addling effect of ideological capture - dare I say, brainwashing. Of course, people like James O’Brien have form here. Remember, O’Brien was a great champion of the convicted paedophile Carl Beech, the vile fantasist who claimed various upstanding public figures were involved in unspeakable crimes. O’Brien’s personal biases clearly cloud his judgement. O'Brien's hubris prevents him from ever acknowledging his errors. And so, even though others who have previously defended Arday have quietly removed their support (most recently the black president of Wolfson College) O'Brien remains chained to the foundering HMS Jason. What these people - and the rest of the woke establishment - don't realise, is that they are being unforgivably racist. Any white professor facing similar accusations to Arday would have been pilloried and investigated long ago. Cambridge normally has a zero tolerance attitude towards plagiarism - yet it refuses to re-examine this professor's credentials. Arday’s race is the reason the progressive left have become his Praetorian Guard. They are holding Arday to a lower standard because he is black. Surely that is, by definition, racist. Me on GB News:show more

Rafe Heydel-Mankoo

71,885 subscribers

38,094 Aufrufe • vor 20 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

The Great Blacksby - Cambridge's diversity hire Professor Jason Arday and the racism of low expectations. Professor Jason Arday is Britain's most impressive black man. He has a list of achievements that would make Chuck Norris blush. He ran 600 miles in six days, without being chased by the police. He ran 30 marathons in 35 days, nine of them with a broken leg. He raised £5.5m for charity. He once threw a kettle over a pub. He was non-verbal until just before his 12th birthday but still managed to play football and snooker professionally. He couldn't read or write until he was eighteen but became Cambridge's youngest ever black professor. He completed a PhD while having a brain tumour removed and having a stroke. But now some people are casting doubt on these achievements. They say they have unearthed evidence of plagiarism; of 188 sentences in his PhD thesis that are identical or nearly identical to another person's thesis. As Professor Arday would say, the evidence for this is "poultry". As James O'Brien and everyone else on the left would say, these people are bigots. There's no way Cambridge's white female elites would unfairly elevate a man just because he's black and has dreadlocks and they want to look like good people. I firmly believe that James O'Brien is correct and Professor Jason Arday is the smartest black man who has ever lived.

The Great Blacksby - Cambridge's diversity hire Professor Jason Arday and the racism of low expectations. Professor Jason Arday is Britain's most impressive black man. He has a list of achievements that would make Chuck Norris blush. He ran 600 miles in six days, without being chased by the police. He ran 30 marathons in 35 days, nine of them with a broken leg. He raised £5.5m for charity. He once threw a kettle over a pub. He was non-verbal until just before his 12th birthday but still managed to play football and snooker professionally. He couldn't read or write until he was eighteen but became Cambridge's youngest ever black professor. He completed a PhD while having a brain tumour removed and having a stroke. But now some people are casting doubt on these achievements. They say they have unearthed evidence of plagiarism; of 188 sentences in his PhD thesis that are identical or nearly identical to another person's thesis. As Professor Arday would say, the evidence for this is "poultry". As James O'Brien and everyone else on the left would say, these people are bigots. There's no way Cambridge's white female elites would unfairly elevate a man just because he's black and has dreadlocks and they want to look like good people. I firmly believe that James O'Brien is correct and Professor Jason Arday is the smartest black man who has ever lived.

Leo Kearse - see me on tour! Links in bio

35,902 Aufrufe • vor 24 Tagen

Who shot J. Arday? His tragic death (assumed to be suicide, but it's possible that his pants were on fire) has provoked a typically level headed response from the left. They're screaming about a "public assassination", an "indirect lynching", and they're sharing "kill lists" of the right-wing journalists they blame for his death. BLM is back, and their hero is George Fraud. But it was the left-wing press who laid some of the biggest blows on Jason Arday, such as The Guardian which according to leftists “ignored warnings and published 19 articles about Arday in the 22 days before his death” I mean, 19 articles in 22 days is pretty good. It's not as good as 30 marathons in 35 days, but I suppose The Guardian wasn't doing it to raise £7m for charity. Leftists then hounded Guardian journalists, until someone pointed out that some of them are black. This led to a beautiful moment where Jolyon Maugham backtracked and said the black journalists are wonderful and we need more of them. And it led to bizarre Maoist struggle sessions where left-wing journalists tearfully atoned for actually doing some proper journalism, and promised to go back to pumping out socialist propaganda. ”Abolish the police!” has become “Abolish the press”!” Zara Sultanabran said “If Jason Arday were a white middle-class academic, he would not have been hounded by the British press in the way he was.” Which is true because if Jason Arday had been white, he'd never have made it to the heady heights of academia. He'd be working in a warehouse somewhere, or propping up a bar, telling people about the time he defeated Rocky Balboa to take the world heavyweight title. His bollocks talking would never have become an issue. He'd just have a nickname like Bobby Bollocks instead of being called a professor. And there are plenty of examples of white academics being hounded. Criminology professor Mike Adams sent some spicy tweets, was hounded by the mob, subsequently forced into an early retirement, then killed himself. Instead of apologising, the press repeated claims that he was "racist" and "sexist". Toronto school principal Richard Bilkszto attended compulsory anti-racism training in 2021. During the training, he pushed back on a claim made by the trainer that Canada is more racist than the United States. The trainer subsequently used his objection as an example of “white resistance” and implied that he was a "white supremacist". His career was destroyed and he killed himself. The mob is now focusing on Nathan Cofnas, the academic who played a key role in exposing Jason Arday. Jason Arday's tragic fall wasn't the fault of right-wing journalists who exposed the lies. It was Cambridge, the BBC, and the left-wing establishment's fault for allowing the lies to go unchallenged and allowing Jason to rise to such an untenable position, a terrible height from which to fall. The mythologising of Jason paints as some kind of wide-eyed ingenue, an innocent who had no weapons to defend himself, a baby deer of a man (although also somehow also an incredibly intelligent, world-class academic). But Jason Arday wasn't like this. He savagely attacked his critics. When Times Higher Education investigated his claims of plagiarism against him, Jason squashed the story by deploying top defamation lawyers Carter Ruck. The journalist who emailed him with questions, Jack Grove, was reported to the police for racially aggravated harassment. He threw damaging accusations of racism at anyone who crossed him. And I can't believe that Jason couldn't see the road to redemption. His book was going to sell by the cartload. His academic career might be toast, but he'd be a modern-day Frank Abagnale, the man who tricked the DEI panjandrums before falling back to earth. Most of us respected him much more as a real blagger than as a fake academic. Sadly, Jason needed the false respect of academics and leftists more than that.

Who shot J. Arday? His tragic death (assumed to be suicide, but it's possible that his pants were on fire) has provoked a typically level headed response from the left. They're screaming about a "public assassination", an "indirect lynching", and they're sharing "kill lists" of the right-wing journalists they blame for his death. BLM is back, and their hero is George Fraud. But it was the left-wing press who laid some of the biggest blows on Jason Arday, such as The Guardian which according to leftists “ignored warnings and published 19 articles about Arday in the 22 days before his death” I mean, 19 articles in 22 days is pretty good. It's not as good as 30 marathons in 35 days, but I suppose The Guardian wasn't doing it to raise £7m for charity. Leftists then hounded Guardian journalists, until someone pointed out that some of them are black. This led to a beautiful moment where Jolyon Maugham backtracked and said the black journalists are wonderful and we need more of them. And it led to bizarre Maoist struggle sessions where left-wing journalists tearfully atoned for actually doing some proper journalism, and promised to go back to pumping out socialist propaganda. ”Abolish the police!” has become “Abolish the press”!” Zara Sultanabran said “If Jason Arday were a white middle-class academic, he would not have been hounded by the British press in the way he was.” Which is true because if Jason Arday had been white, he'd never have made it to the heady heights of academia. He'd be working in a warehouse somewhere, or propping up a bar, telling people about the time he defeated Rocky Balboa to take the world heavyweight title. His bollocks talking would never have become an issue. He'd just have a nickname like Bobby Bollocks instead of being called a professor. And there are plenty of examples of white academics being hounded. Criminology professor Mike Adams sent some spicy tweets, was hounded by the mob, subsequently forced into an early retirement, then killed himself. Instead of apologising, the press repeated claims that he was "racist" and "sexist". Toronto school principal Richard Bilkszto attended compulsory anti-racism training in 2021. During the training, he pushed back on a claim made by the trainer that Canada is more racist than the United States. The trainer subsequently used his objection as an example of “white resistance” and implied that he was a "white supremacist". His career was destroyed and he killed himself. The mob is now focusing on Nathan Cofnas, the academic who played a key role in exposing Jason Arday. Jason Arday's tragic fall wasn't the fault of right-wing journalists who exposed the lies. It was Cambridge, the BBC, and the left-wing establishment's fault for allowing the lies to go unchallenged and allowing Jason to rise to such an untenable position, a terrible height from which to fall. The mythologising of Jason paints as some kind of wide-eyed ingenue, an innocent who had no weapons to defend himself, a baby deer of a man (although also somehow also an incredibly intelligent, world-class academic). But Jason Arday wasn't like this. He savagely attacked his critics. When Times Higher Education investigated his claims of plagiarism against him, Jason squashed the story by deploying top defamation lawyers Carter Ruck. The journalist who emailed him with questions, Jack Grove, was reported to the police for racially aggravated harassment. He threw damaging accusations of racism at anyone who crossed him. And I can't believe that Jason couldn't see the road to redemption. His book was going to sell by the cartload. His academic career might be toast, but he'd be a modern-day Frank Abagnale, the man who tricked the DEI panjandrums before falling back to earth. Most of us respected him much more as a real blagger than as a fake academic. Sadly, Jason needed the false respect of academics and leftists more than that.

Leo Kearse - see me on tour! Links in bio

24,238 Aufrufe • vor 3 Tagen

The Free Speech Union is taking an interest in the story of Jason Arday for a number of reasons. First, we want to know who paid for the threatening letter from the law firm Carter-Ruck — effectively a SLAPP — that was sent to Times Higher Education in an attempt to get journalist Jack Grove to stop asking Professor Arday questions about his academic record. Was it Jason Arday himself? The University of Cambridge? Or the Good Law Project? Second, we want to know who reported both the academic and former professor David Harris and Times Higher Education journalist Jack Grove to the police, alleging harassment after they began asking Arday questions about his academic and extracurricular record. In David Harris’s case, the Metropolitan Police referred the complaint to Devon and Cornwall Police, which rightly decided there was nothing to investigate. But in Jack Grove’s case, he was contacted by the police and informed that he had been the subject of a four-month investigation by the Met. While officers said they would be taking no further action, he was told he should refrain from questioning Jason Arday again because it was also affecting Arday’s mental health. The police should never be telling journalists whom they can and cannot question — particularly when there are legitimate questions that need answering. Powerful people should not be able to use the police to silence journalists and academics who are simply asking questions and doing their jobs. The Free Speech Union has written to Sir Mark Rowley, Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, to ask what on earth his officers were playing at. He has yet to reply. If Jason Arday was the person who reported these individuals to the police, that is one thing. But if it was the University of Cambridge, that would be even more serious — and is something FSU General Secretary Lord Young will be raising in Parliament in due course. Watch Lord Young below 👇

The Free Speech Union is taking an interest in the story of Jason Arday for a number of reasons. First, we want to know who paid for the threatening letter from the law firm Carter-Ruck — effectively a SLAPP — that was sent to Times Higher Education in an attempt to get journalist Jack Grove to stop asking Professor Arday questions about his academic record. Was it Jason Arday himself? The University of Cambridge? Or the Good Law Project? Second, we want to know who reported both the academic and former professor David Harris and Times Higher Education journalist Jack Grove to the police, alleging harassment after they began asking Arday questions about his academic and extracurricular record. In David Harris’s case, the Metropolitan Police referred the complaint to Devon and Cornwall Police, which rightly decided there was nothing to investigate. But in Jack Grove’s case, he was contacted by the police and informed that he had been the subject of a four-month investigation by the Met. While officers said they would be taking no further action, he was told he should refrain from questioning Jason Arday again because it was also affecting Arday’s mental health. The police should never be telling journalists whom they can and cannot question — particularly when there are legitimate questions that need answering. Powerful people should not be able to use the police to silence journalists and academics who are simply asking questions and doing their jobs. The Free Speech Union has written to Sir Mark Rowley, Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, to ask what on earth his officers were playing at. He has yet to reply. If Jason Arday was the person who reported these individuals to the police, that is one thing. But if it was the University of Cambridge, that would be even more serious — and is something FSU General Secretary Lord Young will be raising in Parliament in due course. Watch Lord Young below 👇

The Free Speech Union

385,786 Aufrufe • vor 13 Tagen

🔥🚨LATEST: James O'Brien, the LBC radio host who built a career mocking conservatives and calling everyone a racist, just admitted on-air he feels 'like a mug' after spending months defending Jason Arday Cambridge University's youngest-ever Black professor, who is now accused of plagiarizing over 180 passages in his PhD thesis, fabricating a book that does not exist, and falsely claiming visiting professorships at three different universities that have all denied it. When The Telegraph first broke the story, O'Brien did not investigate; he attacked the newspapers, called them malicious, and publicly called Arday 'a remarkable and brilliant man.' Arday even hired one of Britain's most feared libel law firms to kill an earlier investigation by Times Higher Education before it could be published. Now that Cambridge has launched a formal investigation and Arday has resigned, O'Brien's only takeaway is that he personally feels duped, not that he owes his audience a single apology for smearing the journalists who got it right. This is what happens when the media protects a narrative instead of reporting the truth: who do you trust more, the conservative outlets that were called racist for asking questions, or the liberal pundit who called them names and got played?

🔥🚨LATEST: James O'Brien, the LBC radio host who built a career mocking conservatives and calling everyone a racist, just admitted on-air he feels 'like a mug' after spending months defending Jason Arday Cambridge University's youngest-ever Black professor, who is now accused of plagiarizing over 180 passages in his PhD thesis, fabricating a book that does not exist, and falsely claiming visiting professorships at three different universities that have all denied it. When The Telegraph first broke the story, O'Brien did not investigate; he attacked the newspapers, called them malicious, and publicly called Arday 'a remarkable and brilliant man.' Arday even hired one of Britain's most feared libel law firms to kill an earlier investigation by Times Higher Education before it could be published. Now that Cambridge has launched a formal investigation and Arday has resigned, O'Brien's only takeaway is that he personally feels duped, not that he owes his audience a single apology for smearing the journalists who got it right. This is what happens when the media protects a narrative instead of reporting the truth: who do you trust more, the conservative outlets that were called racist for asking questions, or the liberal pundit who called them names and got played?

Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

75,279 Aufrufe • vor 17 Tagen

The people behind Professor Arday - and the racism row over the academic whistleblower. Jason Arday is the barrel I can’t stop scraping. This week, more footage has emerged to cast doubt on his fantastical claims. A former school friend of his says that Jason was not only able to speak, but he was able to maintain an acapella harmony. And a clip from Surprise Surprise had his girlfriend reeling off his achievements while Jason sweats listening to the bullshit piling up. None of the evidence mounting against him has stopped the usual suspects from rushing to the trenches to defend him. Dr Shola Mos-Eisley-Cantina-bing-bong accused everyone of racism. She could be the next diversity academic to be scrutinised. Bus station tramp James O’Brien put down the bottle of cooking sherry long enough to tell us that only a racist would question Arday - unwittingly making an excellent case for racism, as he implies they’re the only people brave enough to pursue the truth. Nathan Cofnas, an academic who broke rank to ask awkward questions about Professor Arday, was indeed accused of racism for doing so. Journalist Dan Neidle asked “Why was the Jason Arday story broken by a racist blogger and not the mainstream press?”, a question that answers itself (anyone who broke the story would be accused of being a racist blogger by you, Dan). And who were the academics who propelled Professor Arday to such an improbable position? His boss at Cambridge, Hilary Cremin, doesn’t seem to have a professional relationship with him. She holds his hands, stares into his eyes, and gushes over him in a way we wouldn’t see if Jason was a 55-year-old white professor with male-pattern baldness and spectacles. Other academics on the board that unanimously selected him seem to have their own racism problem, condemning “whiteness”, which they described as “pernicious”, and calling for the “re-education of whites”. Haven’t we had enough re-education already? The appointment of Professor Arday, and the condemnation of Nathan Cofnas as “racist” for correctly questioning his appointment, point to a bigger problem in academia where the truth is ignored in favour of expedient ideology. Nathan has researched race science - such landmines as the distribution of IQ by demographic group and the heritability of IQ - and has been condemned for it. It’s academia’s flat-earth belief. No amount of evidence will convince them to drop the mantra that we’re all absolutely equal when it comes to IQ. (I’m being a bit unfair to flat-earthers here because at least the earth looks flat up close.) Harvard psychologist Howard Gardner explicitly states on stage: even if proponents of hereditarian views on intelligence (whom he refers to as “the bad guys”) are correct, “life is short, and we have to make choices about how we spend our time...even if the scientific evidence doesn’t support it.” Yeah, who needs such outmoded ideas as scientific evidence? Certainly not the academic community, that’s for sure.

The people behind Professor Arday - and the racism row over the academic whistleblower. Jason Arday is the barrel I can’t stop scraping. This week, more footage has emerged to cast doubt on his fantastical claims. A former school friend of his says that Jason was not only able to speak, but he was able to maintain an acapella harmony. And a clip from Surprise Surprise had his girlfriend reeling off his achievements while Jason sweats listening to the bullshit piling up. None of the evidence mounting against him has stopped the usual suspects from rushing to the trenches to defend him. Dr Shola Mos-Eisley-Cantina-bing-bong accused everyone of racism. She could be the next diversity academic to be scrutinised. Bus station tramp James O’Brien put down the bottle of cooking sherry long enough to tell us that only a racist would question Arday - unwittingly making an excellent case for racism, as he implies they’re the only people brave enough to pursue the truth. Nathan Cofnas, an academic who broke rank to ask awkward questions about Professor Arday, was indeed accused of racism for doing so. Journalist Dan Neidle asked “Why was the Jason Arday story broken by a racist blogger and not the mainstream press?”, a question that answers itself (anyone who broke the story would be accused of being a racist blogger by you, Dan). And who were the academics who propelled Professor Arday to such an improbable position? His boss at Cambridge, Hilary Cremin, doesn’t seem to have a professional relationship with him. She holds his hands, stares into his eyes, and gushes over him in a way we wouldn’t see if Jason was a 55-year-old white professor with male-pattern baldness and spectacles. Other academics on the board that unanimously selected him seem to have their own racism problem, condemning “whiteness”, which they described as “pernicious”, and calling for the “re-education of whites”. Haven’t we had enough re-education already? The appointment of Professor Arday, and the condemnation of Nathan Cofnas as “racist” for correctly questioning his appointment, point to a bigger problem in academia where the truth is ignored in favour of expedient ideology. Nathan has researched race science - such landmines as the distribution of IQ by demographic group and the heritability of IQ - and has been condemned for it. It’s academia’s flat-earth belief. No amount of evidence will convince them to drop the mantra that we’re all absolutely equal when it comes to IQ. (I’m being a bit unfair to flat-earthers here because at least the earth looks flat up close.) Harvard psychologist Howard Gardner explicitly states on stage: even if proponents of hereditarian views on intelligence (whom he refers to as “the bad guys”) are correct, “life is short, and we have to make choices about how we spend our time...even if the scientific evidence doesn’t support it.” Yeah, who needs such outmoded ideas as scientific evidence? Certainly not the academic community, that’s for sure.

Leo Kearse - see me on tour! Links in bio

137,696 Aufrufe • vor 11 Tagen

Breaking News🇬🇧: "People don't want to see black people at Cambridge. This level of scrutiny would never have happened to Professor Arday if he was white". Watch as Talk presenter Julia Hartley-Brewer absolutely cremates black race baiting 'academic' Professor Kahinderd Andrews. Andrews through garbled utterings, makes the case for the 'innocence' of fellow black academic and now proven fraudster Jason Arday. The narrative that no-one black should face criticism of scrutiny of any kind because it's fuelled purely on racial hatred and not justice is completely pathetic and should carry a criminal charge is made in attempt to avoid regulations and/or legal ramifications. More the miasma of lies told by Arday and other like him hired through DEI quotas should be subject to the Fraud Act of 2006. Source: The lovely Julia Hartley-Brewer.

Breaking News🇬🇧: "People don't want to see black people at Cambridge. This level of scrutiny would never have happened to Professor Arday if he was white". Watch as Talk presenter Julia Hartley-Brewer absolutely cremates black race baiting 'academic' Professor Kahinderd Andrews. Andrews through garbled utterings, makes the case for the 'innocence' of fellow black academic and now proven fraudster Jason Arday. The narrative that no-one black should face criticism of scrutiny of any kind because it's fuelled purely on racial hatred and not justice is completely pathetic and should carry a criminal charge is made in attempt to avoid regulations and/or legal ramifications. More the miasma of lies told by Arday and other like him hired through DEI quotas should be subject to the Fraud Act of 2006. Source: The lovely Julia Hartley-Brewer.

HIN News🇬🇧🇺🇸

28,143 Aufrufe • vor 19 Tagen

The prequel to the Jason Arday scandal Nathan Cofnas explains the two articles he wrote back in 2024, which resulted in his essential expulsion from Cambridge University. The first argued that right-wing politics on average attracted lower IQ people. Not a peep was heard from the Cambridge establishment. The second argued that ending affirmative action in higher education in the United States would result in the collapse of black representation within that sector. Cue outrage. As Nathan explains in my interview on David Starkey Talks, the Jason Arday scandal might have played out VERY differently if it hadn’t been him, the man who Cambridge vilified and ostracised just a year earlier, who exposed Mr Arday’s rampant plagiarism.

The prequel to the Jason Arday scandal Nathan Cofnas explains the two articles he wrote back in 2024, which resulted in his essential expulsion from Cambridge University. The first argued that right-wing politics on average attracted lower IQ people. Not a peep was heard from the Cambridge establishment. The second argued that ending affirmative action in higher education in the United States would result in the collapse of black representation within that sector. Cue outrage. As Nathan explains in my interview on David Starkey Talks, the Jason Arday scandal might have played out VERY differently if it hadn’t been him, the man who Cambridge vilified and ostracised just a year earlier, who exposed Mr Arday’s rampant plagiarism.

David Starkey

281,723 Aufrufe • vor 15 Tagen

Bill Maher: “Jason Arday… he was the first Black professor at Cambridge… the youngest… really he was GUILTY of plagiarism and all sorts of incredible lies, and because [the left] is so captivated by DEI and wanting this. They just let it pass… It’s the soft bigotry of LOW expectations.” New York Times’ Jeremy Peters: “They IGNORED the glaring red flags like grammatical errors in his thesis and things in his back story that just didn’t add up, like running 30 marathons in 35 days.” *Audience Laughs* “Cambridge has a LOT of explaining about how they seemed to have really cynically used this person who was obviously struggling with mental illness to FURTHER their diversity and inclusion goals.” Bill Maher: “He said he ran the marathons with a broken leg... It’s like a prank! Like can we make liberals, who want to believe this, actually do it, and they did.” “White people are crazy.”

Bill Maher: “Jason Arday… he was the first Black professor at Cambridge… the youngest… really he was GUILTY of plagiarism and all sorts of incredible lies, and because [the left] is so captivated by DEI and wanting this. They just let it pass… It’s the soft bigotry of LOW expectations.” New York Times’ Jeremy Peters: “They IGNORED the glaring red flags like grammatical errors in his thesis and things in his back story that just didn’t add up, like running 30 marathons in 35 days.” Audience Laughs “Cambridge has a LOT of explaining about how they seemed to have really cynically used this person who was obviously struggling with mental illness to FURTHER their diversity and inclusion goals.” Bill Maher: “He said he ran the marathons with a broken leg... It’s like a prank! Like can we make liberals, who want to believe this, actually do it, and they did.” “White people are crazy.”

RedWave Press

1,345,293 Aufrufe • vor 3 Tagen

Amongst the hundreds of professors to walk the cloisters of Cambridge, Jason Arday stood out. So why has he just resigned? The young Black sociologist rose to the top of the academic tree in Cambridge and he was much sought after in the years following the Black Lives Matter movement. But then reports emerged about alleged plagiarism. A campaign driven by a handful of academics took a closer look at his work, igniting no shortage of racist abuse online and on Wednesday Professor Arday resigned from his post after Cambridge University announced a new investigation. Following his resignation, supporters of the youngest Black professor in Cambridge's history claim he's been singled out unfairly. Scholars who've analysed his work say his alleged plagiarism is an extreme example. But in a higher education sector struggling with funding pressures, some worry Arday’s may not be an isolated case. So how did race play a role in his rise and his fall?

Amongst the hundreds of professors to walk the cloisters of Cambridge, Jason Arday stood out. So why has he just resigned? The young Black sociologist rose to the top of the academic tree in Cambridge and he was much sought after in the years following the Black Lives Matter movement. But then reports emerged about alleged plagiarism. A campaign driven by a handful of academics took a closer look at his work, igniting no shortage of racist abuse online and on Wednesday Professor Arday resigned from his post after Cambridge University announced a new investigation. Following his resignation, supporters of the youngest Black professor in Cambridge's history claim he's been singled out unfairly. Scholars who've analysed his work say his alleged plagiarism is an extreme example. But in a higher education sector struggling with funding pressures, some worry Arday’s may not be an isolated case. So how did race play a role in his rise and his fall?

Channel 4 News

77,202 Aufrufe • vor 18 Tagen

Jason Arday shouldn’t be dead. But he is dead - because he didn’t tell the truth. And Cambridge University didn’t look for the truth - because he’s black. And fellow black professors didn’t ask for the truth - because he is black. Jason lied repeatedly. And he told the exact lies that allow one to excel in the system that elite universities have adopted. A system that factors in race, hardship, and lived experience under the banner of equity, instead of pure performance. Nearly everyone in these institutions ignored Jason’s lies, to try and protect black people. They called the people seeking the truth racists. Of course there were some racists. But the majority of people just wanted the truth. Avoiding the truth didn’t help black people. Double standards in academia aren’t helping black people. They hurt the perception of black people who are truly the best, and would have held prestigious positions at elite schools, solely off the merits of their performance. Double standards always backfire. Even when well intentioned. Even when intended to correct for past oppression. Race-conscious hiring and admissions have created a situation where it is rational to wonder whether a black person has achieved their position because they were simply the best, or because they were good enough, and black. This is not a racist thought. It’s a rational thing to wonder when a system promotes people based on race. It’s a thing I’ve wondered about myself, as someone who graduated from Harvard - which had race-conscious admissions. No amount of insistence that it’s racist will make it racist. It’s no more racist than it would be to wonder whether a white player got into the NBA off of just performance, if the NBA decided to focus on “fixing” the underrepresentation of white people. This is the logical downside of race-conscious hiring and admissions. You can think the downside is worth the upside. But the downside remains. Calling people with legitimate concerns racist didn’t protect black people. It didn’t protect Jason. It hurt black people who have earned their positions. And it allowed a troubled man who built his career on lies to rise to a height so great that his fall from grace killed him. We could have just had the truth. Instead, we have a tragedy.

Jason Arday shouldn’t be dead. But he is dead - because he didn’t tell the truth. And Cambridge University didn’t look for the truth - because he’s black. And fellow black professors didn’t ask for the truth - because he is black. Jason lied repeatedly. And he told the exact lies that allow one to excel in the system that elite universities have adopted. A system that factors in race, hardship, and lived experience under the banner of equity, instead of pure performance. Nearly everyone in these institutions ignored Jason’s lies, to try and protect black people. They called the people seeking the truth racists. Of course there were some racists. But the majority of people just wanted the truth. Avoiding the truth didn’t help black people. Double standards in academia aren’t helping black people. They hurt the perception of black people who are truly the best, and would have held prestigious positions at elite schools, solely off the merits of their performance. Double standards always backfire. Even when well intentioned. Even when intended to correct for past oppression. Race-conscious hiring and admissions have created a situation where it is rational to wonder whether a black person has achieved their position because they were simply the best, or because they were good enough, and black. This is not a racist thought. It’s a rational thing to wonder when a system promotes people based on race. It’s a thing I’ve wondered about myself, as someone who graduated from Harvard - which had race-conscious admissions. No amount of insistence that it’s racist will make it racist. It’s no more racist than it would be to wonder whether a white player got into the NBA off of just performance, if the NBA decided to focus on “fixing” the underrepresentation of white people. This is the logical downside of race-conscious hiring and admissions. You can think the downside is worth the upside. But the downside remains. Calling people with legitimate concerns racist didn’t protect black people. It didn’t protect Jason. It hurt black people who have earned their positions. And it allowed a troubled man who built his career on lies to rise to a height so great that his fall from grace killed him. We could have just had the truth. Instead, we have a tragedy.

Kaizen D. Asiedu

1,066,715 Aufrufe • vor 4 Tagen

#C4News cover the vigil for Jason Arday in Trafalgar Square, London Lord Simon Woolley, Principal of Homerton College, Cambridge, "This time last week I was with Jason, because we knew Jason was suffering, we knew he felt hounded by those rabid wolves" "Jason wouldn't dare leave the house, and we said we'll get a taxi for you. We held him in our arms and told him he was loved" "He held Dianne Abbott's hands and he said: I love you. Then he said, "They're hounding me to death, and I cannot see a way out" Diane Abbott, "He was first appointed as a professor in Cambridge three years ago" "And for those three years he had a vicious campaign, a bitter campaign, by anonymous people, by other professors, who just didn't believe that a black man should be a Cambridge professor" One of his students, "His greatest contribution cannot be found in a palpitation, a title or a citation, nor in his talks" "It is found in people who continue to love him, in the lives he changed, and the confidence gave us and the doors that he fought to hold open behind him" Bell Ribeiro-Addy, "The public cruelty Jason was subjected to was too much for any man to bear" "The outpouring or love, support and grief since his death means so much to us" "Although it is bittersweet, kindness is needed in life, not just in death" Krishnan Guru-Murthy, "If you could change the world in any way, how would you change it?" Professor Jason Arday, "I would take a thread and a needle and I would interweave love into our society." "I think the absence of love in our society is absolutely palpable." "I feel the empathy we have for one another, the tolerance for one another, has completely eroded" "There is so much anger in society, and I often think what would one replace that with?" "If I could change the world, I would have the world spin on an axis of love"

#C4News cover the vigil for Jason Arday in Trafalgar Square, London Lord Simon Woolley, Principal of Homerton College, Cambridge, "This time last week I was with Jason, because we knew Jason was suffering, we knew he felt hounded by those rabid wolves" "Jason wouldn't dare leave the house, and we said we'll get a taxi for you. We held him in our arms and told him he was loved" "He held Dianne Abbott's hands and he said: I love you. Then he said, "They're hounding me to death, and I cannot see a way out" Diane Abbott, "He was first appointed as a professor in Cambridge three years ago" "And for those three years he had a vicious campaign, a bitter campaign, by anonymous people, by other professors, who just didn't believe that a black man should be a Cambridge professor" One of his students, "His greatest contribution cannot be found in a palpitation, a title or a citation, nor in his talks" "It is found in people who continue to love him, in the lives he changed, and the confidence gave us and the doors that he fought to hold open behind him" Bell Ribeiro-Addy, "The public cruelty Jason was subjected to was too much for any man to bear" "The outpouring or love, support and grief since his death means so much to us" "Although it is bittersweet, kindness is needed in life, not just in death" Krishnan Guru-Murthy, "If you could change the world in any way, how would you change it?" Professor Jason Arday, "I would take a thread and a needle and I would interweave love into our society." "I think the absence of love in our society is absolutely palpable." "I feel the empathy we have for one another, the tolerance for one another, has completely eroded" "There is so much anger in society, and I often think what would one replace that with?" "If I could change the world, I would have the world spin on an axis of love"

Farrukh

163,453 Aufrufe • vor 7 Tagen

We often ask: how did Britain get so broken? Prof. Jason Arday, the Milli Vanilli of academia, the man who HUMILIATED Britain's woke elite, may offer a partial answer. There needs to be a root and branch investigation into D.E.I. hires, not only in academia, but in companies, organisations and institutions across the UK, and also in the USA, Canada and everywhere else that has embraced this ludicrous policy of self-harm. This story is far bigger than Arday and does not end with his resignation. It is a national scandal that has exposed the corruption, incompetence and ideological capture of universities, the police, the media and the Woke Establishment. It should sound the death knell for D.E.I. programmes and the ridiculous non-subjects that feed it (eg Critical Race Theory) Leading public figures in politics, academia and the media also have serious questions to answer. The woke mind virus has addled their brains so badly that they couldn't or wouldn't see what was so blatantly obvious to everyone else. My New Culture Forum monologue:

We often ask: how did Britain get so broken? Prof. Jason Arday, the Milli Vanilli of academia, the man who HUMILIATED Britain's woke elite, may offer a partial answer. There needs to be a root and branch investigation into D.E.I. hires, not only in academia, but in companies, organisations and institutions across the UK, and also in the USA, Canada and everywhere else that has embraced this ludicrous policy of self-harm. This story is far bigger than Arday and does not end with his resignation. It is a national scandal that has exposed the corruption, incompetence and ideological capture of universities, the police, the media and the Woke Establishment. It should sound the death knell for D.E.I. programmes and the ridiculous non-subjects that feed it (eg Critical Race Theory) Leading public figures in politics, academia and the media also have serious questions to answer. The woke mind virus has addled their brains so badly that they couldn't or wouldn't see what was so blatantly obvious to everyone else. My New Culture Forum monologue:

Rafe Heydel-Mankoo

87,958 Aufrufe • vor 18 Tagen

Snoop Fraud: MORE revelations about Jason Arday There are further developments in the story of Professor Jason Arday, aka Scamuel L Jackson, aka Baron Munch-chicken. He claimed that he was threatened by a knife wielding maniac on campus - but he didn’t report it, he said his family received a pigs head in the post - which the police and the butchers deny, he was on TV show "7 Up" - but it was broadcast 21 years before he was born. I'm at the point now where I wouldn't be surprised to learn that he isn't even black. Leftists are still fawning over him, race grifters are digging in and the BBC is still pushing narratives of "racism", but the tidal wave of bullshit has swept away his support and the credibility not just of Cambridge, but of this sort of academia. Birmingham University's Professor of Black Studies, Kehinde Andrews, is soon to be out of a job as only 8 people signed up to study Black. Other blackademics are sure to be exposed as their output seems to consist of moaning about their own personal experience. Perhaps these universities could replace Black Studies with my course in Prejudice? I teach students to notice patterns of behaviour and apply that knowledge - with a surprisingly high accuracy. It's a fantastic tool with many real-world applications. I used it to immediately guess (correctly) that Jason Arday was a bullshatter and that the simpering white liberals who appointed him were just desperate to be seen to be near a black man with dreadlocks. Leo Kearse, Professor of Prejudice at Cambridge University. It might be the thing to save academia. More worryingly, the police spent 4 months investigating a journalist for racially aggravated harassment because the journalist questioned him. Ethnic minorities are now well aware that authorities will do anything for them if they hear the magic word "racism".

Snoop Fraud: MORE revelations about Jason Arday There are further developments in the story of Professor Jason Arday, aka Scamuel L Jackson, aka Baron Munch-chicken. He claimed that he was threatened by a knife wielding maniac on campus - but he didn’t report it, he said his family received a pigs head in the post - which the police and the butchers deny, he was on TV show "7 Up" - but it was broadcast 21 years before he was born. I'm at the point now where I wouldn't be surprised to learn that he isn't even black. Leftists are still fawning over him, race grifters are digging in and the BBC is still pushing narratives of "racism", but the tidal wave of bullshit has swept away his support and the credibility not just of Cambridge, but of this sort of academia. Birmingham University's Professor of Black Studies, Kehinde Andrews, is soon to be out of a job as only 8 people signed up to study Black. Other blackademics are sure to be exposed as their output seems to consist of moaning about their own personal experience. Perhaps these universities could replace Black Studies with my course in Prejudice? I teach students to notice patterns of behaviour and apply that knowledge - with a surprisingly high accuracy. It's a fantastic tool with many real-world applications. I used it to immediately guess (correctly) that Jason Arday was a bullshatter and that the simpering white liberals who appointed him were just desperate to be seen to be near a black man with dreadlocks. Leo Kearse, Professor of Prejudice at Cambridge University. It might be the thing to save academia. More worryingly, the police spent 4 months investigating a journalist for racially aggravated harassment because the journalist questioned him. Ethnic minorities are now well aware that authorities will do anything for them if they hear the magic word "racism".

Leo Kearse - see me on tour! Links in bio

60,457 Aufrufe • vor 18 Tagen

Telling a large angry crowd that Jason Arday was ‘lynched’ and ‘assassinated’, as Lord Woolley - the head of my old Cambridge college, Homerton - recently did, is about as perfect an example of ‘misinformation’ as it’s possible to imagine. Has BBC Verify ‘fact checked’ this blatant, deeply divisive, falsehood? Let’s see. Nope. Has it fact checked the identical claim by self-proclaimed and prominent ‘anti-racist’ figures? Nope. Oh but the BBC has quoted those figures as authorities in their coverage of Arday, without mentioning that they are spreading absolutely ideologically motivated, wildly misleading claims. And will there be calls ‘not to weaponise’ the tragic death of Arday, to insist no political conclusions be drawn, an insistence we wait for the ‘full facts to be known’ before passing comment, and so on, like there always are whenever deaths occur that undermine a progressive narrative? Doesn’t seem like it… How odd!

Telling a large angry crowd that Jason Arday was ‘lynched’ and ‘assassinated’, as Lord Woolley - the head of my old Cambridge college, Homerton - recently did, is about as perfect an example of ‘misinformation’ as it’s possible to imagine. Has BBC Verify ‘fact checked’ this blatant, deeply divisive, falsehood? Let’s see. Nope. Has it fact checked the identical claim by self-proclaimed and prominent ‘anti-racist’ figures? Nope. Oh but the BBC has quoted those figures as authorities in their coverage of Arday, without mentioning that they are spreading absolutely ideologically motivated, wildly misleading claims. And will there be calls ‘not to weaponise’ the tragic death of Arday, to insist no political conclusions be drawn, an insistence we wait for the ‘full facts to be known’ before passing comment, and so on, like there always are whenever deaths occur that undermine a progressive narrative? Doesn’t seem like it… How odd!

Max Klinger

122,638 Aufrufe • vor 6 Tagen

$British TV Show Rewarded Jason Arday After Being Told Tales of His Fundraising in 2012 I have obtained this recording of a 2012 episode of the British TV show "Surprise Surprise." In it, Jason Arday's then-partner, later wife Debbie McKenzie tells the host he didn't learn to read until 16; Arday has long claimed he was 18, but doesn't correct her on the show. She also claims he, at 27, had raised £250,000. We now know this is almost certainly false. Asked by the host why he does such nice things for people, a bashful Arday says: "There's people that do amazing things day in and day out, and I'm just fortunate enough that I'm surrounded by people who appreciate it." To reward what almost certainly were falsehoods on Arday's part (it is unclear whether McKenzie knew he had not raised all that money), the TV show pledged to send him to New York to watch the marathon (which was canceled that year due to Hurricane Sandy). They also sent him to see Andy Murray play and to meet the tennis legend. One might argue that by receiving material goods in exchange for falsehoods, Arday had committed fraud. Murray later marveled over Arday's story to the Guardian, in particular Arday's claim, likely false, that he ran the last 10 marathons with a hairline fracture in his leg. In the mid-2010s, Arday applied for a university job. I obtained his application, in which he claimed that Murray supported his fundraising. I asked a representative for Murray if this were true and they said they had no record of the quote tweet.$

British TV Show Rewarded Jason Arday After Being Told Tales of His Fundraising in 2012 I have obtained this recording of a 2012 episode of the British TV show "Surprise Surprise." In it, Jason Arday's then-partner, later wife Debbie McKenzie tells the host he didn't learn to read until 16; Arday has long claimed he was 18, but doesn't correct her on the show. She also claims he, at 27, had raised £250,000. We now know this is almost certainly false. Asked by the host why he does such nice things for people, a bashful Arday says: "There's people that do amazing things day in and day out, and I'm just fortunate enough that I'm surrounded by people who appreciate it." To reward what almost certainly were falsehoods on Arday's part (it is unclear whether McKenzie knew he had not raised all that money), the TV show pledged to send him to New York to watch the marathon (which was canceled that year due to Hurricane Sandy). They also sent him to see Andy Murray play and to meet the tennis legend. One might argue that by receiving material goods in exchange for falsehoods, Arday had committed fraud. Murray later marveled over Arday's story to the Guardian, in particular Arday's claim, likely false, that he ran the last 10 marathons with a hairline fracture in his leg. In the mid-2010s, Arday applied for a university job. I obtained his application, in which he claimed that Murray supported his fundraising. I asked a representative for Murray if this were true and they said they had no record of the quote tweet.

Benjamin Ryan

962,755 Aufrufe • vor 17 Tagen

This is shocking from Ranvir Singh and Good Morning Britain. On yesterday’s show, while discussing the death of Jason Arday, the Cambridge professor who faced serious plagiarism allegations and major questions about his claimed achievements, they allowed Kehinde Andrews to make an extreme accusation without challenge. Kehinde is asked by Richard Madeley: “We’re still awaiting the official cause of death but assumptions are being made. Did he give any indication to you what his intentions were?” Kehinde replies: “Well, I think assumptions can be made because what’s happened is a young man has been lynched by the media. It’s very clear. The mob got to him and as a result he’s dead. If he was not black, if he was white, he’d still be alive today.” That is extremely strong, provocative, and reckless language. Accusing the media of “lynching” a man simply for reporting documented allegations of plagiarism, fabricated achievements, and major discrepancies in his background is outrageous. The hosts should have challenged it immediately. Instead, Ranvir Singh immediately agrees with a “yep” and even asks him to expand on it for the doubters. I expect this kind of race-obsessed framing from Kehinde Andrews. He sees everything through that lens. But GMB hosts are supposed to be impartial and fair. Letting that claim stand, and worse, endorsing it, is a disgrace. This story was extensively covered and caught the public’s attention precisely because it was an extraordinary case: a high-profile Cambridge professor facing serious, evidence-based questions about his academic work and life story. The media did not invent these issues, and they did not report them because Jason Arday was Black. They reported them because the claims were serious, specific, and newsworthy. Failing to push back on the “lynching” accusation is journalistic failure.

J Stewart

200,873 Aufrufe • vor 7 Tagen

Predictably this woman had been deemed racist for her rant about the school not fully disclosing or taking action against the boy who assaulted her daughter. A boy who has previously assaulted other girls in the school which has similarly been downplayed because he is supposedly acting in accordance with his cultural attitudes towards women and girls. Do the virtue signalling VAWG apologists seriously think that this mother would not be just as outraged if the boy in question was white British? Have people lost all sense of reason and judgement when it comes to the cult of DEI and progressiveness? Are they genuinely unable to accept that a parent’s reaction to their child being assaulted is going to be anger - and that they will damn well want the school to be held accountable if there is even a whiff that this assault was avoidable if the school hadn’t downplayed or covered up previous acts of violence by this boy? Would THEY quietly accept violence against THEIR child in the name of inclusivity? “Progressiveness” has become a virus that has infected our institutions, resulting in a conscious suppression of the innate instinct to protect children at all costs - regardless of the race or culture and race of the perpetrator. This mum is absolutely right to call it out. She’s right to NOT suppress that instinct to protect her child and to demand accountability of those who allowed it to happen.

Predictably this woman had been deemed racist for her rant about the school not fully disclosing or taking action against the boy who assaulted her daughter. A boy who has previously assaulted other girls in the school which has similarly been downplayed because he is supposedly acting in accordance with his cultural attitudes towards women and girls. Do the virtue signalling VAWG apologists seriously think that this mother would not be just as outraged if the boy in question was white British? Have people lost all sense of reason and judgement when it comes to the cult of DEI and progressiveness? Are they genuinely unable to accept that a parent’s reaction to their child being assaulted is going to be anger - and that they will damn well want the school to be held accountable if there is even a whiff that this assault was avoidable if the school hadn’t downplayed or covered up previous acts of violence by this boy? Would THEY quietly accept violence against THEIR child in the name of inclusivity? “Progressiveness” has become a virus that has infected our institutions, resulting in a conscious suppression of the innate instinct to protect children at all costs - regardless of the race or culture and race of the perpetrator. This mum is absolutely right to call it out. She’s right to NOT suppress that instinct to protect her child and to demand accountability of those who allowed it to happen.

Boudica’s Daughters

30,637 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🤨 Paula Rhone-Adrien just cannot bring herself to say the obvious about Jason Arday. She calls it “complicated”. It is not complicated. This is one of the clearest cases you will ever see. A man who built a career on an extraordinary personal story packed with claims that collapse under basic scrutiny got found out. Plagiarism in the PhD work. Disputed affiliations. A book that doesn’t appear to exist as claimed. Charity figures that don’t add up. Extreme athletic feats that look fabricated. Jeremy listed some of them on air. These are not minor CV embellishments. They are wild! Instead of addressing any of that, Paula reaches for the race card and the “he’s not the first Black person attacked in a role” line. She drags in an unrelated case just to keep the racism narrative going. She treats Arday’s denials and his “exhausted by attacks on who I am” explanation as credible while the problems pile up. Why believe a man whose story is full of holes just because of his race? This is the pattern: when the evidence points to fabrication and academic misconduct, some people still default to “racism” because that is the preferred explanation. Everything becomes about race. The actual substance gets sidelined. Jeremy, surprisingly for him, said he believes people actually went easy on Arday because of his race. Woke glasses briefly off. He immediately caveated it with “this is me speaking now, I’m a white person and maybe I can’t see this.” So close, Jeremy. 😂 Arday resigned. The university opened an investigation after new information. That is not a racial conspiracy. That is what happens when the claims finally get checked. Calling a fantasist a fantasist is not racism.

🤨 Paula Rhone-Adrien just cannot bring herself to say the obvious about Jason Arday. She calls it “complicated”. It is not complicated. This is one of the clearest cases you will ever see. A man who built a career on an extraordinary personal story packed with claims that collapse under basic scrutiny got found out. Plagiarism in the PhD work. Disputed affiliations. A book that doesn’t appear to exist as claimed. Charity figures that don’t add up. Extreme athletic feats that look fabricated. Jeremy listed some of them on air. These are not minor CV embellishments. They are wild! Instead of addressing any of that, Paula reaches for the race card and the “he’s not the first Black person attacked in a role” line. She drags in an unrelated case just to keep the racism narrative going. She treats Arday’s denials and his “exhausted by attacks on who I am” explanation as credible while the problems pile up. Why believe a man whose story is full of holes just because of his race? This is the pattern: when the evidence points to fabrication and academic misconduct, some people still default to “racism” because that is the preferred explanation. Everything becomes about race. The actual substance gets sidelined. Jeremy, surprisingly for him, said he believes people actually went easy on Arday because of his race. Woke glasses briefly off. He immediately caveated it with “this is me speaking now, I’m a white person and maybe I can’t see this.” So close, Jeremy. 😂 Arday resigned. The university opened an investigation after new information. That is not a racial conspiracy. That is what happens when the claims finally get checked. Calling a fantasist a fantasist is not racism.

J Stewart

186,424 Aufrufe • vor 19 Tagen

Police found Jason Arday dead yesterday afternoon, nine days after he resigned his Cambridge professorship in disgrace. The Metropolitan Police said his death “is being treated as unexpected, but is not believed to be suspicious.” His family strongly implied his death was a suicide. “The campaign of misinformation was too much for Jason,” they wrote. Whether or not he killed himself, what led to his tragic rise and downfall is plain for everyone to see. While the family understandably blames the people who questioned Jason Arday, responsibility for his fall from grace belongs to the people who not only failed to hold him responsible for his plagiarism and false claims but also actively denied them and attacked the people who pointed them out. The BBC has today published an article headlined, “Analysis: Jason Arday’s death will send shockwaves through a divided academia.” Let’s hope it does. But it should also send shockwaves through the media, especially the BBC, which in March 2023 broadcast a deeply irresponsible and error-filled documentary about Arday, a clip of which can be seen above. The hagiographic documentary remains on the BBC’s YouTube page. Information in the documentary video and in the text below it includes multiple false claims.... Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning investigative journalism, read the full article, and watch the full video.

Police found Jason Arday dead yesterday afternoon, nine days after he resigned his Cambridge professorship in disgrace. The Metropolitan Police said his death “is being treated as unexpected, but is not believed to be suspicious.” His family strongly implied his death was a suicide. “The campaign of misinformation was too much for Jason,” they wrote. Whether or not he killed himself, what led to his tragic rise and downfall is plain for everyone to see. While the family understandably blames the people who questioned Jason Arday, responsibility for his fall from grace belongs to the people who not only failed to hold him responsible for his plagiarism and false claims but also actively denied them and attacked the people who pointed them out. The BBC has today published an article headlined, “Analysis: Jason Arday’s death will send shockwaves through a divided academia.” Let’s hope it does. But it should also send shockwaves through the media, especially the BBC, which in March 2023 broadcast a deeply irresponsible and error-filled documentary about Arday, a clip of which can be seen above. The hagiographic documentary remains on the BBC’s YouTube page. Information in the documentary video and in the text below it includes multiple false claims.... Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning investigative journalism, read the full article, and watch the full video.

Michael Shellenberger

49,113 Aufrufe • vor 10 Tagen

. Dave Rubin literally hit the nail on the head and said something that is so important and so obvious yet seems to be completely missed by a lot of people who walk around and pretend to be OG maga. Those of us who voted and fought for President Trump to get back into this White House can also sit here and give you a litany of successes. Is he perfect? Of course he’s not. He’s a human being. We are all sinners and we are all imperfect. But he is one of the best presidents we have ever had in this country and to say otherwise is disingenuous if you were claiming to be a big Trump supporter for the past 10 years. You have people who voted for the most pro- Israel president of my lifetime and the minute he got into the office they made Israel their number one issue and they critique him about this issue every single day and it’s insane and disingenuous and that is the reason the entire movement feels like it’s being torn apart. But I will say this, they are the minority. Maga is not dead. And anyone saying that sounds just like the people who said Kamala is brat.

. Dave Rubin literally hit the nail on the head and said something that is so important and so obvious yet seems to be completely missed by a lot of people who walk around and pretend to be OG maga. Those of us who voted and fought for President Trump to get back into this White House can also sit here and give you a litany of successes. Is he perfect? Of course he’s not. He’s a human being. We are all sinners and we are all imperfect. But he is one of the best presidents we have ever had in this country and to say otherwise is disingenuous if you were claiming to be a big Trump supporter for the past 10 years. You have people who voted for the most pro- Israel president of my lifetime and the minute he got into the office they made Israel their number one issue and they critique him about this issue every single day and it’s insane and disingenuous and that is the reason the entire movement feels like it’s being torn apart. But I will say this, they are the minority. Maga is not dead. And anyone saying that sounds just like the people who said Kamala is brat.

Insurrection Barbie

58,386 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten