Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

🤨 Paula Rhone-Adrien just cannot bring herself to say the obvious about Jason Arday. She calls it “complicated”. It is not complicated. This is one of the clearest cases you will ever see. A man who built a career on an extraordinary personal story packed with claims that collapse... under basic scrutiny got found out. Plagiarism in the PhD work. Disputed affiliations. A book that doesn’t appear to exist as claimed. Charity figures that don’t add up. Extreme athletic feats that look fabricated. Jeremy listed some of them on air. These are not minor CV embellishments. They are wild! Instead of addressing any of that, Paula reaches for the race card and the “he’s not the first Black person attacked in a role” line. She drags in an unrelated case just to keep the racism narrative going. She treats Arday’s denials and his “exhausted by attacks on who I am” explanation as credible while the problems pile up. Why believe a man whose story is full of holes just because of his race? This is the pattern: when the evidence points to fabrication and academic misconduct, some people still default to “racism” because that is the preferred explanation. Everything becomes about race. The actual substance gets sidelined. Jeremy, surprisingly for him, said he believes people actually went easy on Arday because of his race. Woke glasses briefly off. He immediately caveated it with “this is me speaking now, I’m a white person and maybe I can’t see this.” So close, Jeremy. 😂 Arday resigned. The university opened an investigation after new information. That is not a racial conspiracy. That is what happens when the claims finally get checked. Calling a fantasist a fantasist is not racism.show more

J Stewart

35,125 subscribers

186,192 görüntüleme • 18 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

Haberler & Politika

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

🤨 Race-baiting GRIFTER Narinder Kaur is at it again! Jeremy Vine asks her about the Jason Arday scandal — the Cambridge professor whose career has collapsed under mountains of plagiarism, fabricated research, and a life story so full of wild exaggerations it borders on parody. Her response? “He’s not the first to have plagiarised. He’s not the first to have lied. He’s not the first to have exaggerated.” Jeremy: “That’s not a good defence.” Narinder: “It is actually, because the level of reaction. The level of unhinged reaction that I’ve seen in this country, can only mean one thing to me. It’s because he’s a black professor.” There it is. The race card, played on autopilot. Arday’s record includes extensive PhD plagiarism, fabricated research data and academic affiliations, claims of raising £5.5 million for charity, near-professional snooker success (one recorded amateur loss) and semi-pro football, ultra-running feats like 600 miles in six days and 30 marathons in 35 days (some after a broken leg and epileptic fit), being non-verbal until 11, a pig’s head sent to his parents, and attacks by knife-wielding masked intruders. This is one of the most egregious cases of academic and biographical inflation in history! Most people looking at the evidence simply call it what it is. Narinder can’t. Because the man is Black, criticism must be “unhinged racism”. She does this constantly: any pointed criticism of a Black public figure is reframed as racial animus, while she herself is permanently fixated on race, constantly dividing people by colour and treating disagreement as evidence of bigotry. No one is more obsessed with race than the person who sees it in every disagreement. When the evidence of plagiarism, invention and exaggeration is this extensive and public, the honest response is to condemn the conduct. Turning it into “you’re only angry because he’s Black” is not analysis. It’s cynical race-baiting that excuses clear wrongdoing to protect a preferred narrative.

🤨 Race-baiting GRIFTER Narinder Kaur is at it again! Jeremy Vine asks her about the Jason Arday scandal — the Cambridge professor whose career has collapsed under mountains of plagiarism, fabricated research, and a life story so full of wild exaggerations it borders on parody. Her response? “He’s not the first to have plagiarised. He’s not the first to have lied. He’s not the first to have exaggerated.” Jeremy: “That’s not a good defence.” Narinder: “It is actually, because the level of reaction. The level of unhinged reaction that I’ve seen in this country, can only mean one thing to me. It’s because he’s a black professor.” There it is. The race card, played on autopilot. Arday’s record includes extensive PhD plagiarism, fabricated research data and academic affiliations, claims of raising £5.5 million for charity, near-professional snooker success (one recorded amateur loss) and semi-pro football, ultra-running feats like 600 miles in six days and 30 marathons in 35 days (some after a broken leg and epileptic fit), being non-verbal until 11, a pig’s head sent to his parents, and attacks by knife-wielding masked intruders. This is one of the most egregious cases of academic and biographical inflation in history! Most people looking at the evidence simply call it what it is. Narinder can’t. Because the man is Black, criticism must be “unhinged racism”. She does this constantly: any pointed criticism of a Black public figure is reframed as racial animus, while she herself is permanently fixated on race, constantly dividing people by colour and treating disagreement as evidence of bigotry. No one is more obsessed with race than the person who sees it in every disagreement. When the evidence of plagiarism, invention and exaggeration is this extensive and public, the honest response is to condemn the conduct. Turning it into “you’re only angry because he’s Black” is not analysis. It’s cynical race-baiting that excuses clear wrongdoing to protect a preferred narrative.

J Stewart

65,216 görüntüleme • 11 gün önce

Narinder Kaur on Jeremy Vine claims the only reason disgraced Cambridge professor Jason Arday became such a big story is because he’s Black. “The level of unhinged reaction that I’ve seen in this country can only mean one thing to me. It’s because he’s a black professor.” No Narinder this isn’t about race. It’s about serious allegations of plagiarism and false claims at one of Britain’s most prestigious universities. That deserves scrutiny.

Narinder Kaur on Jeremy Vine claims the only reason disgraced Cambridge professor Jason Arday became such a big story is because he’s Black. “The level of unhinged reaction that I’ve seen in this country can only mean one thing to me. It’s because he’s a black professor.” No Narinder this isn’t about race. It’s about serious allegations of plagiarism and false claims at one of Britain’s most prestigious universities. That deserves scrutiny.

Skint Eastwood

27,823 görüntüleme • 11 gün önce

This is shocking from Ranvir Singh and Good Morning Britain. On yesterday’s show, while discussing the death of Jason Arday, the Cambridge professor who faced serious plagiarism allegations and major questions about his claimed achievements, they allowed Kehinde Andrews to make an extreme accusation without challenge. Kehinde is asked by Richard Madeley: “We’re still awaiting the official cause of death but assumptions are being made. Did he give any indication to you what his intentions were?” Kehinde replies: “Well, I think assumptions can be made because what’s happened is a young man has been lynched by the media. It’s very clear. The mob got to him and as a result he’s dead. If he was not black, if he was white, he’d still be alive today.” That is extremely strong, provocative, and reckless language. Accusing the media of “lynching” a man simply for reporting documented allegations of plagiarism, fabricated achievements, and major discrepancies in his background is outrageous. The hosts should have challenged it immediately. Instead, Ranvir Singh immediately agrees with a “yep” and even asks him to expand on it for the doubters. I expect this kind of race-obsessed framing from Kehinde Andrews. He sees everything through that lens. But GMB hosts are supposed to be impartial and fair. Letting that claim stand, and worse, endorsing it, is a disgrace. This story was extensively covered and caught the public’s attention precisely because it was an extraordinary case: a high-profile Cambridge professor facing serious, evidence-based questions about his academic work and life story. The media did not invent these issues, and they did not report them because Jason Arday was Black. They reported them because the claims were serious, specific, and newsworthy. Failing to push back on the “lynching” accusation is journalistic failure.

J Stewart

200,873 görüntüleme • 6 gün önce

Mark Zuckerberg just described the obsolescence of every institution on Earth and delivered it like a product update. Zuckerberg: “I just think in the future almost everyone is gonna have the power of a 10,000-person organization.” He did not say better tools. He did not say smarter apps. He said the full cognitive output of ten thousand human beings. Packaged into a product. Handed to one person. That is not an upgrade. That is the end of the reason human beings organize at all. Companies exist because one brain is not enough. Governments exist because coordination requires hierarchy. Universities exist because knowledge demands infrastructure. Every institution ever built was a workaround for the same limitation. No single person could do it alone. Zuckerberg is telling you that limitation is about to disappear. The 500-person startup becomes one founder and an AI stack. The law firm becomes one attorney and a system that never sleeps. The hospital becomes one doctor carrying every specialist in their pocket. That is not speculation. That is a deployment schedule. And the man writing it runs a 70,000-person company. He employs 70,000 people and just told the world one person will soon need none of them. That is not a prediction. That is a confession from the man who will be first to act on it. But the part nobody is discussing matters more. This technology does not land on everyone equally. It lands first on the people who already command 10,000-person organizations. Zuckerberg does not get the power of 10,000 people. He already has that. He gets the power of 10,000 organizations. Every revolution in history was sold as liberation. The printing press was supposed to democratize knowledge. It built media empires. The internet was supposed to democratize commerce. It built trillion-dollar platforms. The tool always arrives as liberation. It always settles as leverage. And leverage always consolidates upward. Zuckerberg is not wrong about the capability. One person will do what ten thousand once did. But the question nobody is asking is the only one that matters. If everyone wields the output of 10,000 people, what is a single person actually worth? And then Zuckerberg answered his own question without realizing it. Zuckerberg: “If the intelligence of a 10,000-person company is not greater than the intelligence of a single person, then what are we doing here?” He meant it as a case for AI. That is the most brutal thing a CEO has ever said about the people who work for him.

Mark Zuckerberg just described the obsolescence of every institution on Earth and delivered it like a product update. Zuckerberg: “I just think in the future almost everyone is gonna have the power of a 10,000-person organization.” He did not say better tools. He did not say smarter apps. He said the full cognitive output of ten thousand human beings. Packaged into a product. Handed to one person. That is not an upgrade. That is the end of the reason human beings organize at all. Companies exist because one brain is not enough. Governments exist because coordination requires hierarchy. Universities exist because knowledge demands infrastructure. Every institution ever built was a workaround for the same limitation. No single person could do it alone. Zuckerberg is telling you that limitation is about to disappear. The 500-person startup becomes one founder and an AI stack. The law firm becomes one attorney and a system that never sleeps. The hospital becomes one doctor carrying every specialist in their pocket. That is not speculation. That is a deployment schedule. And the man writing it runs a 70,000-person company. He employs 70,000 people and just told the world one person will soon need none of them. That is not a prediction. That is a confession from the man who will be first to act on it. But the part nobody is discussing matters more. This technology does not land on everyone equally. It lands first on the people who already command 10,000-person organizations. Zuckerberg does not get the power of 10,000 people. He already has that. He gets the power of 10,000 organizations. Every revolution in history was sold as liberation. The printing press was supposed to democratize knowledge. It built media empires. The internet was supposed to democratize commerce. It built trillion-dollar platforms. The tool always arrives as liberation. It always settles as leverage. And leverage always consolidates upward. Zuckerberg is not wrong about the capability. One person will do what ten thousand once did. But the question nobody is asking is the only one that matters. If everyone wields the output of 10,000 people, what is a single person actually worth? And then Zuckerberg answered his own question without realizing it. Zuckerberg: “If the intelligence of a 10,000-person company is not greater than the intelligence of a single person, then what are we doing here?” He meant it as a case for AI. That is the most brutal thing a CEO has ever said about the people who work for him.

Dustin

54,061 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

🔥🚨LATEST: James O'Brien, the LBC radio host who built a career mocking conservatives and calling everyone a racist, just admitted on-air he feels 'like a mug' after spending months defending Jason Arday Cambridge University's youngest-ever Black professor, who is now accused of plagiarizing over 180 passages in his PhD thesis, fabricating a book that does not exist, and falsely claiming visiting professorships at three different universities that have all denied it. When The Telegraph first broke the story, O'Brien did not investigate; he attacked the newspapers, called them malicious, and publicly called Arday 'a remarkable and brilliant man.' Arday even hired one of Britain's most feared libel law firms to kill an earlier investigation by Times Higher Education before it could be published. Now that Cambridge has launched a formal investigation and Arday has resigned, O'Brien's only takeaway is that he personally feels duped, not that he owes his audience a single apology for smearing the journalists who got it right. This is what happens when the media protects a narrative instead of reporting the truth: who do you trust more, the conservative outlets that were called racist for asking questions, or the liberal pundit who called them names and got played?

🔥🚨LATEST: James O'Brien, the LBC radio host who built a career mocking conservatives and calling everyone a racist, just admitted on-air he feels 'like a mug' after spending months defending Jason Arday Cambridge University's youngest-ever Black professor, who is now accused of plagiarizing over 180 passages in his PhD thesis, fabricating a book that does not exist, and falsely claiming visiting professorships at three different universities that have all denied it. When The Telegraph first broke the story, O'Brien did not investigate; he attacked the newspapers, called them malicious, and publicly called Arday 'a remarkable and brilliant man.' Arday even hired one of Britain's most feared libel law firms to kill an earlier investigation by Times Higher Education before it could be published. Now that Cambridge has launched a formal investigation and Arday has resigned, O'Brien's only takeaway is that he personally feels duped, not that he owes his audience a single apology for smearing the journalists who got it right. This is what happens when the media protects a narrative instead of reporting the truth: who do you trust more, the conservative outlets that were called racist for asking questions, or the liberal pundit who called them names and got played?

Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

75,279 görüntüleme • 16 gün önce

Something that makes Daniel Suarez a fitting winner to the first race after Kyle Busch's passing: In Mexican culture, there is great reverence for the deceased. They are very family-oriented people, and Suarez gets to have his family with him each Coke 600 week. "Kyle, he wasn't my family. But he was someone that gave me a hand when I needed it most. And it wasn't just a hand. It was a hand of a legend, it was a hand of somebody with so much experience. So for that I will be forever grateful. Forever grateful. "Kyle was one of the few drivers out there that I never had an issue with. We always got along amazing. One time he got in trouble in Cancun, he called me, Samantha called me. I mean, some of you guys know what happened there. And then after the race in Mexico City, we partied together, he came to my party. "I just love the guy. He was an amazing person. And for me, one of my goals this weekend is for people to understand these stories of him. Because a lot of people didn't know who he was as a person. Many people, fans, they knew him as a racing driver. "But the person, the person that is behind the firesuit, behind that helmet - that's what counts the most. That family man. Every time that you talk to Kyle about Brexton, his eyes light up. He was a family man. And because of that, this race is so special. All the combination of these things. "And I want to make sure that the focus and the most important thing about this victory is not Spire Motorsports, it's not Daniel Suarez - it's Kyle Busch. Because he was a very, very important piece for me to be here and for Spire Motorsports to be where it is right now."

Something that makes Daniel Suarez a fitting winner to the first race after Kyle Busch's passing: In Mexican culture, there is great reverence for the deceased. They are very family-oriented people, and Suarez gets to have his family with him each Coke 600 week. "Kyle, he wasn't my family. But he was someone that gave me a hand when I needed it most. And it wasn't just a hand. It was a hand of a legend, it was a hand of somebody with so much experience. So for that I will be forever grateful. Forever grateful. "Kyle was one of the few drivers out there that I never had an issue with. We always got along amazing. One time he got in trouble in Cancun, he called me, Samantha called me. I mean, some of you guys know what happened there. And then after the race in Mexico City, we partied together, he came to my party. "I just love the guy. He was an amazing person. And for me, one of my goals this weekend is for people to understand these stories of him. Because a lot of people didn't know who he was as a person. Many people, fans, they knew him as a racing driver. "But the person, the person that is behind the firesuit, behind that helmet - that's what counts the most. That family man. Every time that you talk to Kyle about Brexton, his eyes light up. He was a family man. And because of that, this race is so special. All the combination of these things. "And I want to make sure that the focus and the most important thing about this victory is not Spire Motorsports, it's not Daniel Suarez - it's Kyle Busch. Because he was a very, very important piece for me to be here and for Spire Motorsports to be where it is right now."

Steven Taranto

247,245 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

This is the state of society today. A man thinks he has the right to access female-only spaces because his feelings were hurt by people not believing he is a woman. Is that not the object of the game? It is not a woman's burden that you have chosen to medicalise yourself, and it is not up to them to act as your human shield. Just stop. I had to edit out the ending of this video because a minor was on camera, and I do not allow that. I said: "I appreciate that, but women shouldn't have to feel uncomfortable for you to feel comfortable. If they continue to challenge you, advise them that you are male or speak to a member of staff." To see the full protest video, I have posted it on my Substack below. If you are interested in supporting me attending these protest please go to the link in the bio or subscribe to the substack.

This is the state of society today. A man thinks he has the right to access female-only spaces because his feelings were hurt by people not believing he is a woman. Is that not the object of the game? It is not a woman's burden that you have chosen to medicalise yourself, and it is not up to them to act as your human shield. Just stop. I had to edit out the ending of this video because a minor was on camera, and I do not allow that. I said: "I appreciate that, but women shouldn't have to feel uncomfortable for you to feel comfortable. If they continue to challenge you, advise them that you are male or speak to a member of staff." To see the full protest video, I have posted it on my Substack below. If you are interested in supporting me attending these protest please go to the link in the bio or subscribe to the substack.

MichaelDPUK 💜🦎

12,815 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

. Dan Bongino explains there are people within the administration working against Trump and his agenda. They are gearing up for their own political runs. That much is clear. He makes a very important point here, why are all the leaks specifically designed to push the narrative that Trump doesn’t control his own administration? That is not a leftist talking point because the left doesn’t care if he controls the administration or not all they care about is dunking on the administration. This is a talking point from the walk right because the woke Wright wants to remake the Republican Party and remake the agenda the way they do that is by pretending like when Trump tells you this is his agenda. He doesn’t really mean it because he’s just not powerful enough to stand up to whoever’s running the show. They say this without an iota of proof, and then they leaked stories that make it more plausible for you to believe that, even though every single one of these stories blows up in their face. Who are the leakers? A lot of people have a lot of great ideas as to who they really are based on the money movement and the campaigns that are being prepared for takeoff as soon as possible for the 2028 election cycle. I have learned this year that politics is the single dirtiest most disgusting game that exists, and the lengths to which people will go will shock you and I am a person who is already jaded about the entire political arena. That being said, this is still the single greatest country in the world, and we have to fight for the agenda that we voted for and not give up.

. Dan Bongino explains there are people within the administration working against Trump and his agenda. They are gearing up for their own political runs. That much is clear. He makes a very important point here, why are all the leaks specifically designed to push the narrative that Trump doesn’t control his own administration? That is not a leftist talking point because the left doesn’t care if he controls the administration or not all they care about is dunking on the administration. This is a talking point from the walk right because the woke Wright wants to remake the Republican Party and remake the agenda the way they do that is by pretending like when Trump tells you this is his agenda. He doesn’t really mean it because he’s just not powerful enough to stand up to whoever’s running the show. They say this without an iota of proof, and then they leaked stories that make it more plausible for you to believe that, even though every single one of these stories blows up in their face. Who are the leakers? A lot of people have a lot of great ideas as to who they really are based on the money movement and the campaigns that are being prepared for takeoff as soon as possible for the 2028 election cycle. I have learned this year that politics is the single dirtiest most disgusting game that exists, and the lengths to which people will go will shock you and I am a person who is already jaded about the entire political arena. That being said, this is still the single greatest country in the world, and we have to fight for the agenda that we voted for and not give up.

Insurrection Barbie

21,260 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

😳 Isabel Oakeshott did not hold back on TalkTV this morning. Speaking about the death of former Cambridge professor Jason Arday, she was extremely blunt and to the point: “Suicide is the most horrendous thing that anyone can do to themselves or their family. It is an utterly, utterly tragic and selfish thing to do. It is not anyone else’s fault. It is on the person that took that decision.” She continued: “Bluntly, Jason Arday was a fraud. He had made things up to get to the position that he was in. Massively embellishing his credentials and made a whole career out of that. Then it all came tumbling down and he wasn’t tough enough to ride it out.” Oakeshott rejected attempts to blame the media or anyone else, insisting no one is responsible for another person’s decision to take their own life and that Arday’s academic career had been built on dishonesty that finally collapsed under scrutiny. No punches pulled.

😳 Isabel Oakeshott did not hold back on TalkTV this morning. Speaking about the death of former Cambridge professor Jason Arday, she was extremely blunt and to the point: “Suicide is the most horrendous thing that anyone can do to themselves or their family. It is an utterly, utterly tragic and selfish thing to do. It is not anyone else’s fault. It is on the person that took that decision.” She continued: “Bluntly, Jason Arday was a fraud. He had made things up to get to the position that he was in. Massively embellishing his credentials and made a whole career out of that. Then it all came tumbling down and he wasn’t tough enough to ride it out.” Oakeshott rejected attempts to blame the media or anyone else, insisting no one is responsible for another person’s decision to take their own life and that Arday’s academic career had been built on dishonesty that finally collapsed under scrutiny. No punches pulled.

J Stewart

1,302,980 görüntüleme • 7 gün önce

WATCH: Sen. Ted Cruz breaks down the 6-3 Supreme Court ruling in Louisiana v. Callais: “The court concluded is that it is not permissible for elected politicians to gerrymander based on race, to draw a black seat or a white seat or an Hispanic seat, that when government draws distinctions based on race, that is contrary to the Constitution.” Cruz explained: “The Supreme Court issued a 6-3 decision. Justice Alito wrote the majority opinion. And in that opinion, the court vindicated the Constitution of the United States. And in particular the 14th Amendment that ensures that all persons in the United States are entitled to equal protection of the laws, and also the 15th Amendment which protects the right to vote regardless of race. And what the court concluded is that it is not permissible for elected politicians to gerrymander based on race, to draw a black seat or a white seat or an Hispanic seat, that when government draws distinctions based on race, that is contrary to the Constitution. I think that question is absolutely correct. Uh as Chief Justice Roberts wrote in a previous case, it is a sorted business this divying us up by race. He also said the best way to stop discriminating on race is to stop discriminating based on race. And and I think the court's decision here says our government should be blind to color. We should be colorblind. We should not discriminate in favor of or against any race. I think the Supreme Court is correct and and and that uh that is the result of decades of litigation to to to get these racial gerrymanders struck down.”

WATCH: Sen. Ted Cruz breaks down the 6-3 Supreme Court ruling in Louisiana v. Callais: “The court concluded is that it is not permissible for elected politicians to gerrymander based on race, to draw a black seat or a white seat or an Hispanic seat, that when government draws distinctions based on race, that is contrary to the Constitution.” Cruz explained: “The Supreme Court issued a 6-3 decision. Justice Alito wrote the majority opinion. And in that opinion, the court vindicated the Constitution of the United States. And in particular the 14th Amendment that ensures that all persons in the United States are entitled to equal protection of the laws, and also the 15th Amendment which protects the right to vote regardless of race. And what the court concluded is that it is not permissible for elected politicians to gerrymander based on race, to draw a black seat or a white seat or an Hispanic seat, that when government draws distinctions based on race, that is contrary to the Constitution. I think that question is absolutely correct. Uh as Chief Justice Roberts wrote in a previous case, it is a sorted business this divying us up by race. He also said the best way to stop discriminating on race is to stop discriminating based on race. And and I think the court's decision here says our government should be blind to color. We should be colorblind. We should not discriminate in favor of or against any race. I think the Supreme Court is correct and and and that uh that is the result of decades of litigation to to to get these racial gerrymanders struck down.”

Steve Guest

115,581 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Adin Ross says the Karmelo Anthony situation is not about race "The world's going backwards man. There’s this whole Karmelo Anthony situation, it's about right and wrong, not about race" "I'll argue anyone when it comes to that. It's not a race thing. You don't bring a knife to a track meet" "The lady is wrong in that situation. People that donate to that are disgusting. I'm telling you why they're doing it. It’s because of the Karmelo Anthony situation" "It's not about race. They're dumb as f#ck"

Adin Ross says the Karmelo Anthony situation is not about race "The world's going backwards man. There’s this whole Karmelo Anthony situation, it's about right and wrong, not about race" "I'll argue anyone when it comes to that. It's not a race thing. You don't bring a knife to a track meet" "The lady is wrong in that situation. People that donate to that are disgusting. I'm telling you why they're doing it. It’s because of the Karmelo Anthony situation" "It's not about race. They're dumb as f#ck"

dank

196,844 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Black woman claims that Black people can’t be racist and says she walked out on a date with a White man over a disagreement on this: ‘I’m not about to let a White man tell me what racism is.’ Black people can also be racist. White people are the primary targets of racism today.

Black woman claims that Black people can’t be racist and says she walked out on a date with a White man over a disagreement on this: ‘I’m not about to let a White man tell me what racism is.’ Black people can also be racist. White people are the primary targets of racism today.

Taya Bass

99,608 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Joe: “Stephen, I’d like to congratulate you for being the latest black person to be called low IQ by President Trump. It’s quite a long and distinguished list of people.” Stephen A. Smith: “Hold on, just because he did that I’m not going to let you do that. There’s plenty of white people that he called low IQ too. I’m not going to fall for that. I’m not saying you are trying to. You’re not doing anything wrong, Joe. You’re not inaccurate… He’s also accused a lot of white people of having a low IQ as well.” “Let’s not use that as a reason and cause to engage in the racial dynamics of the situation. I’m not taking it that way. I don’t think that Donald Trump does this to black people and not this to white people. I think Donald Trump does anything to anybody who is anti-Trump. He don’t give a d*mn what color, ethnicity, race, or group you are associated with. He could care less. If you are not pro-Trump, you are his enemy, and he treats you like it. That is what I believe.”

Joe: “Stephen, I’d like to congratulate you for being the latest black person to be called low IQ by President Trump. It’s quite a long and distinguished list of people.” Stephen A. Smith: “Hold on, just because he did that I’m not going to let you do that. There’s plenty of white people that he called low IQ too. I’m not going to fall for that. I’m not saying you are trying to. You’re not doing anything wrong, Joe. You’re not inaccurate… He’s also accused a lot of white people of having a low IQ as well.” “Let’s not use that as a reason and cause to engage in the racial dynamics of the situation. I’m not taking it that way. I don’t think that Donald Trump does this to black people and not this to white people. I think Donald Trump does anything to anybody who is anti-Trump. He don’t give a d*mn what color, ethnicity, race, or group you are associated with. He could care less. If you are not pro-Trump, you are his enemy, and he treats you like it. That is what I believe.”

RedWave Press

858,590 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

I stood on the steps of the Supreme Court Monday . Donald Trump has done real things for MAHA. I believe that. But when the Department of Justice shows up to defend Bayer and Monsanto against the American people, against the health of our children, I have to say: you got this one wrong. Liability protection for corporations that poison people is not a conservative value. It is not a Republican value. It is not a Democratic value. It is not an American value. It is the opposite of a free market. It is the government putting its thumb on the scale for corporations that are losing in court because their products are causing cancer. Every child in this country deserves to be healthy. That is not a political statement. That is the only statement that matters. So in the words of the President himself: we are going to fight, fight.

I stood on the steps of the Supreme Court Monday . Donald Trump has done real things for MAHA. I believe that. But when the Department of Justice shows up to defend Bayer and Monsanto against the American people, against the health of our children, I have to say: you got this one wrong. Liability protection for corporations that poison people is not a conservative value. It is not a Republican value. It is not a Democratic value. It is not an American value. It is the opposite of a free market. It is the government putting its thumb on the scale for corporations that are losing in court because their products are causing cancer. Every child in this country deserves to be healthy. That is not a political statement. That is the only statement that matters. So in the words of the President himself: we are going to fight, fight.

Del Bigtree

147,504 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Carlos to DAZN “It doesn’t matter, I believe we were doing a good race fighting por P7, P8 when Charles lost control of the car with the slick and he hit me, my race was over after that because I picked up damage and lost the opportunity to get points” “A bit tired, not with Charles, poor him, he also lost his race and had a bad one. But the fact that it always happens to us(williams) when we are about to grab points.. that someone destroys our weekend, is the story of the season” “I hope our luck changes”

Carlos to DAZN “It doesn’t matter, I believe we were doing a good race fighting por P7, P8 when Charles lost control of the car with the slick and he hit me, my race was over after that because I picked up damage and lost the opportunity to get points” “A bit tired, not with Charles, poor him, he also lost his race and had a bad one. But the fact that it always happens to us(williams) when we are about to grab points.. that someone destroys our weekend, is the story of the season” “I hope our luck changes”

ari

798,766 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Andrew: why didn’t the defense say, “these messages are not authentic, he did not write them”? Stew: because it’s not the defenses job to do that… you don’t understand the Judicial process…. Actually it is the Defenses job to do that. It’s to DEFEND. Huh…? I can’t participate in these delusions some of you have. I’m getting off this clown show. It’s VERY CLEAR that Stew Peters is just making shit up and has provided ZERO evidence of any of his claims. As a WHOLE, all of the EVIDENCE, points towards Tyler Robinson. Not speculation and made fantasies. Actual evidence. Clearly Andrew Wilson is the more reasonable and logical individual in whatever this is.

Andrew: why didn’t the defense say, “these messages are not authentic, he did not write them”? Stew: because it’s not the defenses job to do that… you don’t understand the Judicial process…. Actually it is the Defenses job to do that. It’s to DEFEND. Huh…? I can’t participate in these delusions some of you have. I’m getting off this clown show. It’s VERY CLEAR that Stew Peters is just making shit up and has provided ZERO evidence of any of his claims. As a WHOLE, all of the EVIDENCE, points towards Tyler Robinson. Not speculation and made fantasies. Actual evidence. Clearly Andrew Wilson is the more reasonable and logical individual in whatever this is.

Shady

24,340 görüntüleme • 27 gün önce

A very harsh threat, made by Netanyahu toward Iran. What is behind the heightened tone? It is not only harsh, it is also unusual. The event that took place in recent months was a paralyzing fear of what is called miscalculation. They will think that we will attack first, even though that was not the intention, and then they will attack, and the entire region will be dragged into another round of confrontation. In a region where there is fear of miscalculation, you are not supposed to announce this kind of thing in the Knesset. I just want to make that clear. Yesterday, Naftali Bennett promoted his press conference on the conditions of soldiers, okay? He gets six million views because the timing looks like a countdown and he is a former prime minister, so the Iranians are in hysterics that he is actually announcing that they are going to attack. That’s the atmosphere. So when Netanyahu attacks like this and makes an unprecedented threat—not only harsh but also unusual—one can’t help but think that for Netanyahu there is a message, or something more problematic than miscalculation. And he wants to warn the Iranians. Now, what’s the issue? The issue is that if the Iranians come to the conclusion that their regime is on the verge of collapse, there is one thing that might save them. And that is an attack on Israel. Because we saw during the war what is called “rally around the flag.” Even those who were in the opposition rallied around the flag when their country was attacked. It is not only the Islamic Republic that is under attack, but also the Islamic Republic of Iran. That is essentially the issue, and that is what Netanyahu, in my opinion, is trying to stop with the threat he issued after the security discussion.

A very harsh threat, made by Netanyahu toward Iran. What is behind the heightened tone? It is not only harsh, it is also unusual. The event that took place in recent months was a paralyzing fear of what is called miscalculation. They will think that we will attack first, even though that was not the intention, and then they will attack, and the entire region will be dragged into another round of confrontation. In a region where there is fear of miscalculation, you are not supposed to announce this kind of thing in the Knesset. I just want to make that clear. Yesterday, Naftali Bennett promoted his press conference on the conditions of soldiers, okay? He gets six million views because the timing looks like a countdown and he is a former prime minister, so the Iranians are in hysterics that he is actually announcing that they are going to attack. That’s the atmosphere. So when Netanyahu attacks like this and makes an unprecedented threat—not only harsh but also unusual—one can’t help but think that for Netanyahu there is a message, or something more problematic than miscalculation. And he wants to warn the Iranians. Now, what’s the issue? The issue is that if the Iranians come to the conclusion that their regime is on the verge of collapse, there is one thing that might save them. And that is an attack on Israel. Because we saw during the war what is called “rally around the flag.” Even those who were in the opposition rallied around the flag when their country was attacked. It is not only the Islamic Republic that is under attack, but also the Islamic Republic of Iran. That is essentially the issue, and that is what Netanyahu, in my opinion, is trying to stop with the threat he issued after the security discussion.

Amit Segal

41,392 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

The reason that this extra diverse doctor lawyer equal does not respond as normal to simple explanations has to do with theory of mind. The police officer explains six times that she caused an accident and now has to provide her insurance. The diverse equal knows that she caused the accident. She remembers it from mere moments ago. However, the police officer was not there during the accident. She did not see him there. Therefore, according to diversity mathematics, the police officer could not possibly know that there was an accident at all. How could he? He did not see it. Or rather, she did not see him seeing it. "If I did not see the police officer looking at me as I caused an accident, then he does not know that I caused an accident. I know this because I am unable to know anything that I did not personally witness, and so that is how everybody's mind works." In the vibrant mind of the diversity, everything that does not happen in front of a person's eyes is a confusing mess that is impossible to understand. There simply is no way to ascertain that something happened if you did not see it before your eyes. That is why this extra diverse value contributor believes that the police officer is similarly confused. "It should be easy to get away with lying about this accident," she calculated, diversely. "He ain't see nothin.'" That is why, when he insists that the accident did in fact occur, she has no choice but to perceive this as racism. How could it not be? Every other diverse equal that she has ever lied to in a similar fashion has been easily confused, and let her go after committing similar crimes. So in the mind of the diversity, "black people always let me go when I lie, but white people never do, so white people must just be evil racists." We are truly enriched by the genius of these builders of civilization

The reason that this extra diverse doctor lawyer equal does not respond as normal to simple explanations has to do with theory of mind. The police officer explains six times that she caused an accident and now has to provide her insurance. The diverse equal knows that she caused the accident. She remembers it from mere moments ago. However, the police officer was not there during the accident. She did not see him there. Therefore, according to diversity mathematics, the police officer could not possibly know that there was an accident at all. How could he? He did not see it. Or rather, she did not see him seeing it. "If I did not see the police officer looking at me as I caused an accident, then he does not know that I caused an accident. I know this because I am unable to know anything that I did not personally witness, and so that is how everybody's mind works." In the vibrant mind of the diversity, everything that does not happen in front of a person's eyes is a confusing mess that is impossible to understand. There simply is no way to ascertain that something happened if you did not see it before your eyes. That is why this extra diverse value contributor believes that the police officer is similarly confused. "It should be easy to get away with lying about this accident," she calculated, diversely. "He ain't see nothin.'" That is why, when he insists that the accident did in fact occur, she has no choice but to perceive this as racism. How could it not be? Every other diverse equal that she has ever lied to in a similar fashion has been easily confused, and let her go after committing similar crimes. So in the mind of the diversity, "black people always let me go when I lie, but white people never do, so white people must just be evil racists." We are truly enriched by the genius of these builders of civilization

hoe_math = PsychoMath

232,770 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

“Iran is not going to declare an end to the war while Israel is still attacking Lebanon. It has to be part of the deal. And of course, Bibi won’t play ball because he doesn’t want the war to end. And Trump is just waking up to that fact three months into the war, and he’s not happy about it.” “A lot of what he’s saying is that Bibi should do everything that he says. And now he’s learning that that’s not the way the world works. So constantly over the past three months, Trump is confronted by reality, which totally contradicts the made up story he has about the Iran war in his head. And guess what? In the end, reality is winning out.” “And that’s why we’re in the quagmire we’re in. Because Trump won’t accept the reality. He only wants the world to bend to what’s in his head. In this case, he’s not getting what he wants, so he’s throwing a tantrum.”

“Iran is not going to declare an end to the war while Israel is still attacking Lebanon. It has to be part of the deal. And of course, Bibi won’t play ball because he doesn’t want the war to end. And Trump is just waking up to that fact three months into the war, and he’s not happy about it.” “A lot of what he’s saying is that Bibi should do everything that he says. And now he’s learning that that’s not the way the world works. So constantly over the past three months, Trump is confronted by reality, which totally contradicts the made up story he has about the Iran war in his head. And guess what? In the end, reality is winning out.” “And that’s why we’re in the quagmire we’re in. Because Trump won’t accept the reality. He only wants the world to bend to what’s in his head. In this case, he’s not getting what he wants, so he’s throwing a tantrum.”

Josh Rogin

13,279 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce