Загрузка видео...
Не удалось загрузить видео
how did DeepSeek-v4.1-Flash became so good both the outputs are from same prompts.. DeepSeek's flash model on max effort smokes Opus 5 on medium effort and the crazy part is it's still 90% cheaper best strategy would be to use Opus for planning and deepseek-v4.1-flash for execution, that would... show more
11,371 просмотров • 2 дней назад •via X (Twitter)
Комментарии: 13

i totally disagree with the "opus planning" part. Opus isnt necessarily any smarter, and planning can still burn absurd amounts of tokens via input tokens for search. I say DS4.1F for Research/Gathering of Decision critical intel, Fable 5.1 or Jev for decisions, DS4.1 dev

honestly, I really wanna see the comparison of these models against Gemini 4Pro but I feel gemini would do good

我用gpt sol 做规划,deepseek 执行,结果还不如直接让 deepseek v4.1 flash solo

Has Gemini 4 Pro come out?

90% cheaper at max effort = likely distilled reasoning tokens. Opus plans, DeepSeek executes high-volume steps. Gemini 4 Pro may win only on long-context/multimodal workloads.

求个提示词

Always Astra Max for planning. Luna Max, DeepSeek 4.1 Flash, Muse Spark 1.3, Gemini 3.8 Flash for implementation.

Best strategy would be to ditch the nanny ai and just go straight deepseek.

我用起来,真不错的👍

It's wild coding with dseek. Coding become enjoy again.

One thing deepseek should problem is in China. They should move server to nearby or other country for user and data privacy.

help: what harness did u use

先别急着封神,真实任务里的稳定性还得再跑跑
