Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

How Pfizer duped billions via statistical manipulation: Pfizer reported that its vaccine shows a 95% efficacy. That sounds like it protects you 95% of the time, right? But that's not actually what that number means. That 95% refers to the relative risk reduction, but it doesn't tell you how...

newstart_2024's profile picture

Camus

354,164 subscribers

44,169 views • 10 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Health & WellnessScience & TechnologyEducation
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

The Conclusion is Inescapable: When You Replace the 50% Relative Risk with the 2% Absolute Risk, the COVID Vaccine Narrative Collapses. This was the great statistical deception deployed for the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. Regulators and pharmaceutical companies had a choice: report Absolute Risk Reduction (the real-world benefit) or Relative Risk Reduction (the impressive-sounding headline). They consistently chose the latter to frame the vaccines as a monumental success. Let's break down the math that shaped global policy: • Absolute Risk (The Truth in Context): If your risk of symptomatic COVID drops from a baseline of 3% to 1% after the shot, that is a 2% Absolute Risk Reduction. This is the tangible difference for an individual. • Relative Risk (The Manipulated Headline): That same change is spun as a "50% improvement." The benefit appears revolutionary, while the real-world impact for the individual is far more modest. This was not a minor oversight. It was a calculated communication strategy that obscured the true, absolute benefit of the mRNA products. As analyst Leslie Manookian warned, those who read the initial trial data saw this immediately. The primary endpoint was the reduction of mild symptoms, yet the efficacy was marketed to the public using this statistical sleight-of-hand. The story of overwhelming, individual benefit only holds under the lens of relative risk. Under the harsh, transparent light of absolute risk, the narrative shifts dramatically. Demanding this transparency for COVID-19 vaccines isn't anti-science—it is the bedrock of true scientific and informed consent.
1:04

The Conclusion is Inescapable: When You Replace the 50% Relative Risk with the 2% Absolute Risk, the COVID Vaccine Narrative Collapses. This was the great statistical deception deployed for the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. Regulators and pharmaceutical companies had a choice: report Absolute Risk Reduction (the real-world benefit) or Relative Risk Reduction (the impressive-sounding headline). They consistently chose the latter to frame the vaccines as a monumental success. Let's break down the math that shaped global policy: • Absolute Risk (The Truth in Context): If your risk of symptomatic COVID drops from a baseline of 3% to 1% after the shot, that is a 2% Absolute Risk Reduction. This is the tangible difference for an individual. • Relative Risk (The Manipulated Headline): That same change is spun as a "50% improvement." The benefit appears revolutionary, while the real-world impact for the individual is far more modest. This was not a minor oversight. It was a calculated communication strategy that obscured the true, absolute benefit of the mRNA products. As analyst Leslie Manookian warned, those who read the initial trial data saw this immediately. The primary endpoint was the reduction of mild symptoms, yet the efficacy was marketed to the public using this statistical sleight-of-hand. The story of overwhelming, individual benefit only holds under the lens of relative risk. Under the harsh, transparent light of absolute risk, the narrative shifts dramatically. Demanding this transparency for COVID-19 vaccines isn't anti-science—it is the bedrock of true scientific and informed consent.

Camus

25,891 views • 9 months ago

Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR) and Relative Risk Reduction (RRR) are both used to measure the effectiveness of a treatment in clinical studies. ARR measures the absolute difference in risk between control groups, providing the true reduction. RRR measures the proportional reduction relative to the control group, often making effects look larger. Lying with statistics
2:36

Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR) and Relative Risk Reduction (RRR) are both used to measure the effectiveness of a treatment in clinical studies. ARR measures the absolute difference in risk between control groups, providing the true reduction. RRR measures the proportional reduction relative to the control group, often making effects look larger. Lying with statistics

Kelly DNP Functional/Integrative Medicine

16,839 views • 2 months ago

Pfizer's Own Trials Showed a 24% GREATER Likelihood of Dying in the Vaccine Group After 6 Months "For every life they save by preventing a death from COVID, they are killing four people from cardiac arrest." • In the Pfizer clinical trials, they gave 22,000 people two COVID injections and 22,000 people fake vaccines. • Of the 44,000 in total, one person died of COVID in the vaccine group, and two people died of COVID in the placebo group. So Pfizer, with the misleading measure of relative risk reduction, called their vaccine "100% effective" because two is 100% greater than one. But from the angle of absolute risk, it took 22,000 vaccines to save just one life from COVID. • And over a 6-month period, 21 of the vaccinated people died of all causes, whereas only 17 people died in the placebo group, a 24% difference. So what was killing those people in the vaccine group? "It was cardiac arrest," attested Robert F. Kennedy Jr. "There were five cardiac arrest deaths in the vaccine group and only one in the placebo group. What that means is that if you take that vaccine, you're [five times] more likely to die from a fatal cardiac arrest over the next six months than if you don't. What it also means is that for every life they save by preventing a death from COVID, they are killing four people from cardiac arrest." Full Interview:
4:26

Pfizer's Own Trials Showed a 24% GREATER Likelihood of Dying in the Vaccine Group After 6 Months "For every life they save by preventing a death from COVID, they are killing four people from cardiac arrest." • In the Pfizer clinical trials, they gave 22,000 people two COVID injections and 22,000 people fake vaccines. • Of the 44,000 in total, one person died of COVID in the vaccine group, and two people died of COVID in the placebo group. So Pfizer, with the misleading measure of relative risk reduction, called their vaccine "100% effective" because two is 100% greater than one. But from the angle of absolute risk, it took 22,000 vaccines to save just one life from COVID. • And over a 6-month period, 21 of the vaccinated people died of all causes, whereas only 17 people died in the placebo group, a 24% difference. So what was killing those people in the vaccine group? "It was cardiac arrest," attested Robert F. Kennedy Jr. "There were five cardiac arrest deaths in the vaccine group and only one in the placebo group. What that means is that if you take that vaccine, you're [five times] more likely to die from a fatal cardiac arrest over the next six months than if you don't. What it also means is that for every life they save by preventing a death from COVID, they are killing four people from cardiac arrest." Full Interview:

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,203,345 views • 3 years ago

Best clips of 2025 🏆 💉 “All risk, no benefit”? 💬 “The 95% number was relative risk reduction — real efficacy was just 0.84%. That’s what should’ve been told to the people of New Zealand.” - Dr Alison Goodwin Big Pharma’s spin, backed by government silence, painted a false picture of safety and efficacy. Did you ever hear the full truth about the vaccine trial data? 🎥 Watch here: ✍️ Sign the petition:
2:48

Best clips of 2025 🏆 💉 “All risk, no benefit”? 💬 “The 95% number was relative risk reduction — real efficacy was just 0.84%. That’s what should’ve been told to the people of New Zealand.” - Dr Alison Goodwin Big Pharma’s spin, backed by government silence, painted a false picture of safety and efficacy. Did you ever hear the full truth about the vaccine trial data? 🎥 Watch here: ✍️ Sign the petition:

REALITY CHECK RADIO

44,849 views • 5 months ago

A 50% reduction in hip fractures sounds like a miracle drug. Until you look at what 50% actually means. The drug was Fosamax. Alan Cassels, a health policy researcher who has spent 30 years auditing how drugs get sold, kept the ads. He still uses them in his lectures. More than 3,000 women were in the trial. All of them high risk: low bone density, previous fractures, all defined as having osteoporosis. Researchers followed them for four years. Two out of every hundred broke a hip. On the drug, one out of every hundred did. CASSELS: "When you go from 2 out of 100 down to 1 out of 100, that's a 50% drop." That was the number sold to patients, to doctors, to specialists. "And people went away thinking, this drug is miraculous." Cassels' question is what one broken hip per hundred women is worth against what the drug does to the other ninety-nine. "How does that compare to the rate of adverse effects? And we know that the rate of adverse effects are much greater than 1%." "So you're promoting this drug on the basis of a misleading reduction. And this happens all the time." We saw the same trick in 2021 when Pfizer and Moderna claimed the COVID vaccine was "95% effective." JAN JEKIELEK: "It's the difference between relative risk and absolute risk."
2:51

A 50% reduction in hip fractures sounds like a miracle drug. Until you look at what 50% actually means. The drug was Fosamax. Alan Cassels, a health policy researcher who has spent 30 years auditing how drugs get sold, kept the ads. He still uses them in his lectures. More than 3,000 women were in the trial. All of them high risk: low bone density, previous fractures, all defined as having osteoporosis. Researchers followed them for four years. Two out of every hundred broke a hip. On the drug, one out of every hundred did. CASSELS: "When you go from 2 out of 100 down to 1 out of 100, that's a 50% drop." That was the number sold to patients, to doctors, to specialists. "And people went away thinking, this drug is miraculous." Cassels' question is what one broken hip per hundred women is worth against what the drug does to the other ninety-nine. "How does that compare to the rate of adverse effects? And we know that the rate of adverse effects are much greater than 1%." "So you're promoting this drug on the basis of a misleading reduction. And this happens all the time." We saw the same trick in 2021 when Pfizer and Moderna claimed the COVID vaccine was "95% effective." JAN JEKIELEK: "It's the difference between relative risk and absolute risk."

Epoch Health

43,754 views • 3 days ago

RFK Jr. addresses if he will be removing the Covid vaccine as a mandatory shot for children. “President Trump doesn't believe that anybody should get mandatory vaccines.” “The covid vaccine recommendation for children was always dubious.” “Kids had almost no risk for Covid.” “So why are we giving this to tens of millions of kids when the vaccine itself does have profound risk.” “This was clear even in the clinical data that came out from Pfizer.” “There were about 23% more deaths in the vaccine group than the placebo group.”
1:13

RFK Jr. addresses if he will be removing the Covid vaccine as a mandatory shot for children. “President Trump doesn't believe that anybody should get mandatory vaccines.” “The covid vaccine recommendation for children was always dubious.” “Kids had almost no risk for Covid.” “So why are we giving this to tens of millions of kids when the vaccine itself does have profound risk.” “This was clear even in the clinical data that came out from Pfizer.” “There were about 23% more deaths in the vaccine group than the placebo group.”

End Tribalism in Politics

152,296 views • 1 year ago

The "95% effective" Scam How many people would have chosen to take the Covid-19 vaccines had they understood that they offered less than 1% benefit? Jacinda Ardern Dr Siouxsie Wiles Helen Petousis
2:51

The "95% effective" Scam How many people would have chosen to take the Covid-19 vaccines had they understood that they offered less than 1% benefit? Jacinda Ardern Dr Siouxsie Wiles Helen Petousis

Coronavirus Plushie

35,558 views • 5 months ago

"My overall message to all New Zealanders is that the vaccine is a very safe vaccine, and any SMALL risk associated with the vaccine is by FAR outweighed by the risk of getting COVID-19." That's what Chris Hipkins said on Dec 20, 2021 when he was asked if he had a message for the family of 26 year old Rory Nairn who died from Pfizer shot-related myocarditis. Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH®
2:01

"My overall message to all New Zealanders is that the vaccine is a very safe vaccine, and any SMALL risk associated with the vaccine is by FAR outweighed by the risk of getting COVID-19." That's what Chris Hipkins said on Dec 20, 2021 when he was asked if he had a message for the family of 26 year old Rory Nairn who died from Pfizer shot-related myocarditis. Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH®

Coronavirus Plushie

32,021 views • 4 months ago

“I’ve never seen a vaccine like this,” testified pediatric cardiologist Dr. Kirk Milhoan. The shot Pfizer and Moderna offered us made the COVID situation worse. According to a Cleveland Clinic study, the people who had the most shots had the greatest chance of contracting COVID. “The lowest risk for getting COVID is if you’ve had zero vaccines. As you add vaccines, your risk of getting COVID goes up. I’ve never seen a vaccine like this. That’s not the basis of vaccines.”
0:31

“I’ve never seen a vaccine like this,” testified pediatric cardiologist Dr. Kirk Milhoan. The shot Pfizer and Moderna offered us made the COVID situation worse. According to a Cleveland Clinic study, the people who had the most shots had the greatest chance of contracting COVID. “The lowest risk for getting COVID is if you’ve had zero vaccines. As you add vaccines, your risk of getting COVID goes up. I’ve never seen a vaccine like this. That’s not the basis of vaccines.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,187,064 views • 2 years ago

RFK Jr.’s REAL position on vaccines, in his own words: “My position is that if you want a vaccine, you ought to be able to get a vaccine. But you ought to know the safety profile and the risk profile and the efficacy of that vaccine. That’s it.”
0:33

RFK Jr.’s REAL position on vaccines, in his own words: “My position is that if you want a vaccine, you ought to be able to get a vaccine. But you ought to know the safety profile and the risk profile and the efficacy of that vaccine. That’s it.”

Holden Culotta

186,975 views • 1 year ago

Dr. McCullough: "Pfizer Should Have Never Been Approved" In Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine clinical trials, there were more deaths in the vaccine group than in the placebo group, denoted Dr. Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH®. "And if it [the data] would be properly analyzed, the conclusion was there's a three to fourfold excess cardiovascular risk with Pfizer compared to placebo."
1:33

Dr. McCullough: "Pfizer Should Have Never Been Approved" In Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine clinical trials, there were more deaths in the vaccine group than in the placebo group, denoted Dr. Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH®. "And if it [the data] would be properly analyzed, the conclusion was there's a three to fourfold excess cardiovascular risk with Pfizer compared to placebo."

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

483,512 views • 2 years ago

RFK Jr: "In 1989... all these autoimmune diseases suddenly appeared." "The CDC thought it may be the vaccine schedule... so they looked at one vaccine, which is the hepatitis B vaccine. They looked at kids who had gotten it in the first 30 days, and then they looked at... kids who got it later or didn't get it at all, and they compared these two groups." "Among the kids who got it in the first 30 days, there was... a relative risk of 11.35 [for a subsequent autism diagnosis]. If you have a relative risk of two, causation is presumed... The link between smoking a pack of cigarettes a day for 20 years and getting lung cancer is a relative risk of 10. This was 11.35." "So they knew what it was, and then they had an emergency meeting that they called... and they had all of the big panjandrums from the vaccine industry, from the pharmaceutical industry... from NIH, CDC, FDA, the WHO, the European Medicines Agency, and they all got together for two days to talk about this study." "Somebody made a transcript of it, and that transcript was given to me... The second day they spent talking about how to hide it from the American public, and I published these things... I took a lot of heat at that point."
3:25

RFK Jr: "In 1989... all these autoimmune diseases suddenly appeared." "The CDC thought it may be the vaccine schedule... so they looked at one vaccine, which is the hepatitis B vaccine. They looked at kids who had gotten it in the first 30 days, and then they looked at... kids who got it later or didn't get it at all, and they compared these two groups." "Among the kids who got it in the first 30 days, there was... a relative risk of 11.35 [for a subsequent autism diagnosis]. If you have a relative risk of two, causation is presumed... The link between smoking a pack of cigarettes a day for 20 years and getting lung cancer is a relative risk of 10. This was 11.35." "So they knew what it was, and then they had an emergency meeting that they called... and they had all of the big panjandrums from the vaccine industry, from the pharmaceutical industry... from NIH, CDC, FDA, the WHO, the European Medicines Agency, and they all got together for two days to talk about this study." "Somebody made a transcript of it, and that transcript was given to me... The second day they spent talking about how to hide it from the American public, and I published these things... I took a lot of heat at that point."

Wide Awake Media

755,812 views • 1 year ago

DR. PAUL THOMAS: “You are MORE likely to die from the VACCINE than from the DISEASE, this is true for EVERY single vaccine on the childhood schedule.” DR. SUZANNE HUMPHRIES: “If mandates were to STOP, these companies would CRASH. And that’s not going to be allowed to happen...” The statistical analysis of each vaccine... The risk of death from Polio is 1 in 1 trillion The risk of death from the Polio vaccine is 1 in 215K The risk of death from Diphtheria is 1 in 42.5 million The risk of death from the Diphtheria vaccine 1 in 76K The risk of death from Tetanus is 1 in 1.5 million The risk of death from the Tetanus Vaccine is 1 in 76K The risk of death from Pertussis is 1 in 2.3 million The risk of death from the Pertussis vaccine is 1 in 76K The risk of death from Measles is 1 in 106.5 million The risk of death from the Measles vaccine is 1 in 108K The risk of death from Mumps is 1 in 40.3 million The risk of death from the Mumps vaccine is 1 in 108K The risk of death from Rubella is 1 in 0/negligible The risk of death from the Rubella vaccine is 1 in 108K The risk of death from Chickenpox is 1 in 32.3 million The risk of death from Chickenpox vaccine is 1 in 202K The risk of death from Hepatitis-A is 1 in 1.6 million The risk of death from the Hep-A vaccine is 1 in 73K The risk of death from Hepatitis-B is 1 in 305K The risk of death from the Hep-B vaccine is 1 in 96K The risk of death from HIB is 1 in 1.5 million The risk of death from the HIB vaccine is 1 in 46K The risk of death from Pneumonia is 1 in 236K The risk of death from Pneumonia vaccine is 1 in 50K The risk of death from Meningitis is 1 in 822K The risk of death from Meningitis vaccine is 1 in 141K The risk of death from Influenza is 1 in 136K The risk of death from the Influenza Vaccine is 1 in 15K
1:22

DR. PAUL THOMAS: “You are MORE likely to die from the VACCINE than from the DISEASE, this is true for EVERY single vaccine on the childhood schedule.” DR. SUZANNE HUMPHRIES: “If mandates were to STOP, these companies would CRASH. And that’s not going to be allowed to happen...” The statistical analysis of each vaccine... The risk of death from Polio is 1 in 1 trillion The risk of death from the Polio vaccine is 1 in 215K The risk of death from Diphtheria is 1 in 42.5 million The risk of death from the Diphtheria vaccine 1 in 76K The risk of death from Tetanus is 1 in 1.5 million The risk of death from the Tetanus Vaccine is 1 in 76K The risk of death from Pertussis is 1 in 2.3 million The risk of death from the Pertussis vaccine is 1 in 76K The risk of death from Measles is 1 in 106.5 million The risk of death from the Measles vaccine is 1 in 108K The risk of death from Mumps is 1 in 40.3 million The risk of death from the Mumps vaccine is 1 in 108K The risk of death from Rubella is 1 in 0/negligible The risk of death from the Rubella vaccine is 1 in 108K The risk of death from Chickenpox is 1 in 32.3 million The risk of death from Chickenpox vaccine is 1 in 202K The risk of death from Hepatitis-A is 1 in 1.6 million The risk of death from the Hep-A vaccine is 1 in 73K The risk of death from Hepatitis-B is 1 in 305K The risk of death from the Hep-B vaccine is 1 in 96K The risk of death from HIB is 1 in 1.5 million The risk of death from the HIB vaccine is 1 in 46K The risk of death from Pneumonia is 1 in 236K The risk of death from Pneumonia vaccine is 1 in 50K The risk of death from Meningitis is 1 in 822K The risk of death from Meningitis vaccine is 1 in 141K The risk of death from Influenza is 1 in 136K The risk of death from the Influenza Vaccine is 1 in 15K

Valerie Anne Smith

188,023 views • 1 month ago

You know all the so called Conspiracy theories said the Covid Vaccines increased you Cancer Risk? Well Health Canada disclosed in a Pfizer document that there is SV40.
0:52

You know all the so called Conspiracy theories said the Covid Vaccines increased you Cancer Risk? Well Health Canada disclosed in a Pfizer document that there is SV40.

illuminatibot

317,725 views • 1 year ago

Covid Vaccine Genocide Update… Recipients of the ‘Covid Vaccine’ Pfizer Batch beginning with an ‘E’ (Excess Death Risk) were given batches that were the most lethal. EL0140, EL9261, EL3248, EN9581, EJ1686, EK4176, EK5730, EH9899.
0:26

Covid Vaccine Genocide Update… Recipients of the ‘Covid Vaccine’ Pfizer Batch beginning with an ‘E’ (Excess Death Risk) were given batches that were the most lethal. EL0140, EL9261, EL3248, EN9581, EJ1686, EK4176, EK5730, EH9899.

Liz Churchill

1,430,231 views • 1 year ago

Former CDC Director under Trump, Dr. Robert Redfield, just said Covid vaccines should not have been mandated. And that Biden and Fauci lied to the American public. “When we looked at the Covid vaccines, which I was part of with Operation Warp Speed, the Covid vaccine should have never been mandated.” “There’s no data to support the concept of mandating that vaccine.” “The vaccine did not prevent transmission.” “Its only important role that we found is that it did prevent serious illness and death for people that were at high risk.” “So the vaccine really never should have been recommended for children.” “When President Biden and Tony Fauci said you need to vaccinate your children so they don’t infect grandma, that wasn’t a truthful statement because the vaccine did not prevent transmission.”
1:14

Former CDC Director under Trump, Dr. Robert Redfield, just said Covid vaccines should not have been mandated. And that Biden and Fauci lied to the American public. “When we looked at the Covid vaccines, which I was part of with Operation Warp Speed, the Covid vaccine should have never been mandated.” “There’s no data to support the concept of mandating that vaccine.” “The vaccine did not prevent transmission.” “Its only important role that we found is that it did prevent serious illness and death for people that were at high risk.” “So the vaccine really never should have been recommended for children.” “When President Biden and Tony Fauci said you need to vaccinate your children so they don’t infect grandma, that wasn’t a truthful statement because the vaccine did not prevent transmission.”

End Tribalism in Politics

75,397 views • 8 months ago

Kansas is still suing Pfizer Sen. Blumenthal questions Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach about his case against Pfizer. Kris Koback recently announced "Kansas wins first battle in lawsuit against Pfizer over Covid Vaccine". "A federal judge has granted the State of Kansas’s motion to remand its false advertising lawsuit against Pfizer, Inc. back to state court." “This victory is the first step in bringing justice to the Kansans who were misled by the false statements made by Pfizer regarding the health risks of its COVID vaccine. The case will now proceed in state court" - Kansas AG Kris Kobach Kansas joins Texas, Utah, Mississippi and Louisiana in suing them over various allegations including Misrepresented Efficacy: Falsely claimed the vaccine was highly effective (e.g., 95% efficacy as relative, not absolute, risk reduction) and prevented transmission or protected against variants. Concealed Safety Risks: Hid or downplayed risks like myocarditis, pericarditis, and pregnancy complications, despite internal data showing adverse effects. Deceptive Marketing: Promoted the vaccine as "safe and effective" while omitting critical safety data, misleading consumers. Censorship (Texas-specific): Alleged conspiracy with social media to suppress critics of the vaccine’s efficacy or safety. All at the State level.
0:31

Kansas is still suing Pfizer Sen. Blumenthal questions Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach about his case against Pfizer. Kris Koback recently announced "Kansas wins first battle in lawsuit against Pfizer over Covid Vaccine". "A federal judge has granted the State of Kansas’s motion to remand its false advertising lawsuit against Pfizer, Inc. back to state court." “This victory is the first step in bringing justice to the Kansans who were misled by the false statements made by Pfizer regarding the health risks of its COVID vaccine. The case will now proceed in state court" - Kansas AG Kris Kobach Kansas joins Texas, Utah, Mississippi and Louisiana in suing them over various allegations including Misrepresented Efficacy: Falsely claimed the vaccine was highly effective (e.g., 95% efficacy as relative, not absolute, risk reduction) and prevented transmission or protected against variants. Concealed Safety Risks: Hid or downplayed risks like myocarditis, pericarditis, and pregnancy complications, despite internal data showing adverse effects. Deceptive Marketing: Promoted the vaccine as "safe and effective" while omitting critical safety data, misleading consumers. Censorship (Texas-specific): Alleged conspiracy with social media to suppress critics of the vaccine’s efficacy or safety. All at the State level.

Humanspective

49,927 views • 9 months ago