正在加载视频...
视频加载失败
How to cut aluminum pipe 😉
34 条评论

Circular saw it is...... We should have an Olympics see how fast people can do it. I wonder if a chemical option could work to some kind of painted on hydrochloric acid or something. For entertainment purposes

Skil Saw with a silencer

You want to put a cutting wax on the blade it keeps the blade from gunking up and you can get a ton of cuts out of it.

@TravHunter_TS Pro tip. Use WD40 or some type of lubricant on the work piece and blade

Who the fuxk uses a wood eating blade on sawzall meant for an aluminum pole

Try a pipe cutter. No NOISE.

Doesn't Gallium destroy the structural integrity of Aluminum?

>Wood with nails blade

Or use spray epoxy on an extension pole. Destroys the lens, I heard

Cordless Grinder with a cut off wheel

Great, So people should NEVER cut a cam down with a circular saw since it works the fastest. Another crazy thing about those cameras is people seem to be just running into them mowing them down like they’re drawing attention pulling your vehicle towards them or something and they go down really quick that way I’m glad a lot of people are not trying to do that though.

The realities of modern American law, the architecture of Flock-style systems, and the purpose of the Fourth Amendment: 1. Everyone Is a Technical Criminal The United States maintains an extraordinarily dense web of criminal and regulatory statutes. Traffic, licensing, zoning, environmental, firearms, tax, and administrative rules create countless technical violations that most citizens commit without realizing it. When government possesses continuous location data on virtually every vehicle, the question is no longer “Did you break the law?” but “Which law will be selected for enforcement against you today?” Selective enforcement becomes the true power. Historical and contemporary examples show that such discretion is frequently exercised along political, personal, or institutional lines rather than pure public-safety criteria. 2. Profiling Turns Lawful Behavior into a Targeting Tool Flock systems do not merely check plates against active warrants or stolen-vehicle lists. They generate searchable historical movement data. That data reveals patterns of association, frequency of travel to particular locations, and routines. Once compiled, the government can reverse-engineer a profile and then wait for—or manufacture—a pretext to “hunt.” The claim that only criminals need worry ignores the intermediate step: the creation of a detailed dossier on the law-abiding that can be activated at will. The original concern is precisely this capacity to profile first and enforce later. 3. Constitutional Rights Exist to Constrain Power, Not to Reward Compliance The Fourth Amendment does not say “the right of the people to be secure… shall not be violated unless they have nothing to hide.” It protects the people against unreasonable searches regardless of guilt or innocence. Supreme Court decisions from Katz through Carpenter recognize that the government does not get a free pass simply because the information was initially exposed in public. Aggregated, persistent tracking of movements produces insights far beyond what any ordinary observer could gather. Treating the Amendment as a privilege reserved for the pure inverts its purpose: it is a structural limit on state power. 4. Documented Mission Creep and Error Audits and reporting have already shown Flock data queried for purposes far beyond active criminal investigations—protest monitoring, reproductive-travel tracking, and demographic pattern searches. False positives, data-sharing with federal agencies, and uneven audit controls further undermine the “only criminals” assurance. Once the infrastructure exists, institutional incentives expand its use. Reliance on the good intentions of current operators is not a constitutional safeguard. 5. Chilling Effect on Lawful Conduct Even citizens who never intend to break any law alter their behavior when they know their movements are continuously logged and queryable. Attendance at political meetings, religious services, medical appointments, or association with disfavored individuals becomes riskier. This chilling effect is itself a First Amendment harm and demonstrates that the system burdens the innocent, not merely the guilty. Conclusion The statement “if you are not a criminal, you have nothing to worry about” is the classic defense of unchecked surveillance. It assumes perfect enforcement priorities, zero mission creep, and a legal code so sparse that ordinary people never become technical violators. None of those assumptions holds. Flock-style networks create the capacity to profile the entire driving population and then selectively enforce against chosen targets. That capacity, not the sincerity of current operators, is the constitutional problem. Rights exist precisely because power cannot be trusted to police itself.

Also with the band saw you're going to want to add at the time it takes to run the power cord and start up that ridiculously loud generator with your giant truck and your license plate absolutely not practical.

You know there are metal cutting blades for saws all?

I can cut a 2" stick of steel conduit in 10 seconds with a sawzall. I can cut a 2" stick of rigid in 1.5 minutes with a sawzall. A bandsaw is by all means the best and most easy method. The new M12 Bandsaw would be perfect. The M18 Bandsaw takes 30 seconds to cut a 5" 1/4" steel pole for pole lights.

This dude owns welders but doesn’t know how to properly cut thin metal tubing? Jesus bro.

Flip the sawsall blade over, get a Diablo demolition blade... that thing can cut straight the the wall of house, plumbing and everything like it ain't there

So hypothetically, what if you just wanted to crimp the pipe and lay it over, say for an art project or something?

Put the blade on the circler saw backwards flip it and it will go right through metal no binding been doing it for years even a wood blade will work

Angle grinder metal blade

Great tutorial on cutting pipe…

The one case that made it as far as a grand jury was returned with no charges. I don’t think the government will be able to get charges to stick for this. Flock will probably start suing people for astronomical amounts like record labels did back in the day.

milwaukee makes a carbide torch blade that can cut through cast iron but yeah let's use the one for wood w nails 😂

A little dab of this and no more aluminum buildup in the teeth.

Another option in a ‘97 Chevy Silverado with duck tape on the license plate at approximately 30 mph. That’ll take a flock camera out in less than a second.

How to commit a felony!! I love X

Time to go mid-evil. Simple lever and fulcrum to pop it out of the ground. I’m betting less than 5 seconds till horizontal. Visit the local farm store for a fence puller for design inspiration.

Flock cameras near me. Shit. Did I post or search that?

What an annoying guy

Wood blades cut aluminum faster cause metal blades are finer and the soft metal with gum up the blade, wood blades will vibrate more on aluminum but it will not gum up the blade.

My face the entire time

Good video. Also, when you catch the insulated conductor inside the pipe it will vibrate with the same frequency as the reciprocating saw. I've tried to cut a lot of EMT and aluminum pipe with wire inside. Unless you rotate around the pole it's fruitless

Wear gloves when using said technique don’t take a cell phone with you oh and use eye protection! This is common sense not legal advice 🤣🤔😎

That Sawzall would eat through that in seconds with a blade made for metal... not a fucking wood blade. The teeth are completely different for a reason.
