Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

How to make $1,000,000+ with YouTube Ads during the holidays Background: Views: 2,000,000 Ad Spend: ~$200,000 Revenue: Mid 7 figures Production Cost: ~$15,000 Loom strategy breakdown: I wrote, art directed, directed, and produced this video. The Secret: Gifting Focused Creatives And no…you don’t have to do a full production...

14,088 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

5 Yorum

Ryan profil fotoğrafı
Ryan2 yıl önce

You post the craziest youtube sauce on all of twitter

Brendan profil fotoğrafı
Brendan2 yıl önce

Now that is a complement! Thank you haha

Collin Schmelebeck profil fotoğrafı
Collin Schmelebeck2 yıl önce

can't wait to get in

Brad Mills profil fotoğrafı
Brad Mills2 yıl önce

@jordantwestecom

Arun Sampath profil fotoğrafı
Arun Sampath2 yıl önce

Curious to see how $15k for in house production spread out ?

Benzer Videolar

This is a genius format to use to push traffic for whop affiliate on YouTube I hardly see anyone using YT in this way but it’s genius they utilise shorts and push the traffic from shorts to their YouTube long form videos It could be executed so much better too but the video format is their for you choose a human desire your page is going to fulfil >make more money >be more attractive >have more status identify the problem stopping people from achieving this desire create solution to this problem and package it in this case we’re going to affiliate for a whop product that already solves a problem Understand your customer profile (who’s suffering from this problem) you need to understand your customers better than themselves to create content that resonates they need to feel as though you have dealt with their problems and overcome it this way your value your value in your content comes across as authentic and makes the whole script writing and hook process a lot easier do this by consuming people talking about suffering with the problem >reddit >YT comments >TT comments / videos are a good place to look Branding your page / the avatar your going to use When building faceless accounts the only way you can build trust and authority is with the value you are dropping in your videos they will always trust someone who is showing their actual face more but you can use Avatars in a strategic way to convey this authority sometimes even more than someone showing their actual face There is 3 things you can include in your faceless content to do this >character branding >value >understanding their problem better than themselves your character should capture attention instantly It should correlate to the niche and problem your hitting and stand out For example if I was making a page I would do >Desire: wants to get rid of acne >Problem: doesn’t know what skin care to use >Solution: most of acne comes down to diet so here’s a food plan including lists of meals that counter acne >Character: a blue hollistic hippy looking woman with a doctors coat on with a soothing soft voice All business comes down to solving a problem to get to a desire This is a good way to build traffic and push to a whop affiliate product so you don’t need to build it out yourself

Pounds

11,587 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Tyrannotitan now released in Path of Titans! Introducing the Tyrannotitan, a massive bloodthirsty predator from the early Cretaceous period. This carnivore rivals even Tyrannosaurus and Spinosaurus in size, and is one of the most powerful dinosaurs in the Path of Titans roster. Tyrannotitan is our 'mobile' colossal predator, using bleed and attrition to bring down its prey. It can weaken its opponent's ability to heal, and uses its fairly nimble maneuvering to dodge incoming attacks. This video is a re-upload of the previous video that excludes information that is now outdated, please read on for a full explanation! We're excited to release Tyrannotitan earlier than originally planned as it was originally scheduled for after the full game launch. We knew having the "Titan" in "Path of Titans" was a must-have. This content was originally intended to be purchased separately in a bundle, however due to community feedback we have decided to make it included for free if you already own the "All Base Game Dinosaurs" pack. This also includes the Tyrannotitan Backer skin also being included for free in the "All Backer Skins" bundle. If you purchased the bundle for full-price while it was for sale, you can request a refund through Alderon Games support. This can either be refunded to a Path of Tians coin balance, or payment method depending on what is possible. However, if you would like to keep your bundle, we plan on turning the pack into a skin bundle with 2 additional skins instead, so it is more in line with our other skin packs. We will be making a follow up post very soon with more information about the skins for this bundle that will be included with the next hotpatch. We apologize for the miscommunication around this launch, and we have made changes based upon community feedback. We will announce our future goals on how we plan on handling our post release content, but for now, instead let's enjoy this new dinosaur, and we will focus on releasing the remaining planned dinosaurs and dinosaur TLCs as among our highest priorities. #pathoftitans #dinosaurs

Path of Titans

43,507 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Marc Andreessen: “I’m always urging founders to raise prices, raise prices, raise prices.” “We spend a lot of time working with our companies on pricing,” a16z co-founder Marc Andreessen explains. “It’s really this magical art and science that a lot of companies don’t take seriously enough.” Marc continues: “A core principle of pricing is that you don’t want to price by cost if you can avoid it. You want to price by value. Especially when you’re selling to businesses, you want to price as a percentage of the business value you’re creating.” He gives the example of building an AI that can do the job of a programmer, a lawyer, or a radiologist: “Can you price by value and get a percentage of what otherwise would’ve literally been a person? Or equivalently can you price by marginal productivity? If you can take a human doctor and make them much more productive because you give them AI, can you price as a percentage of the productivity uplift?” Marc argues that high prices are under-appreciated by founders: “The naive view on pricing is the lower the pricing, the better it is for the customer. The more sophisticated way of looking at it is that higher prices are often good for the customer because the higher price means the vendor can make the product better, faster. Companies with higher prices and higher margins can actually invest more in R&D and make the product better. Most people who buy things aren’t just looking for the cheapest price. They want something that’s going to work really well.” Marc also emphasizes this point in an interview in Elad Gil’s High Growth Handbook: “What I hear from companies is, ‘Oh, we have an awesome moat, and we’re still going to price our product cheap, because we think that’s somehow going to maximize our business.’ I’m always urging founders to raise prices, raise prices, raise prices. I’m always urging founders to raise prices, raise prices, raise prices. First of all, raising prices is a great way to flesh out whether you actually do have a moat. If you do have a moat, the customers will still buy, because they have to. The definition of a moat is the ability to charge more. And so number one, it’s just a good way to flesh out that topic and really expose it to sunlight. And then number two, companies that charge more can better fund both their distribution efforts and their ongoing R&D efforts. Charging more is a key lever to be able to grow. And the companies that charge more therefore tend to grow faster. That’s counterintuitive to a lot of engineers. A lot of engineers think there’s a one-dimensional relationship between price and value. They have this mental model of commerce like they’re selling rice or something. It’s like, “My product is magical and nobody can replicate it, and I need to price it like it’s a commodity.” No, you don’t. In fact, quite the opposite. If you price it high, then you can fund a much more expensive sales and marketing effort, which means you’re much more likely to win the market, which means you’re much more likely to be able afford to do all the R&D and acquisitions you’re going to want to do. And so we always try to snap people into a two-dimensional mindset, where higher prices equals faster growth.” Video source: a16z (2026)

Startup Archive

422,892 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

Marc Andreessen: “I’m always urging founders to raise prices, raise prices, raise prices.” “We spend a lot of time working with our companies on pricing,” a16z co-founder Marc Andreessen explains. “It’s really this magical art and science that a lot of companies don’t take seriously enough.” Marc continues: “A core principle of pricing is that you don’t want to price by cost if you can avoid it. You want to price by value. Especially when you’re selling to businesses, you want to price as a percentage of the business value you’re creating.” He gives the example of building an AI that can do the job of a programmer, a lawyer, or a radiologist: “Can you price by value and get a percentage of what otherwise would’ve literally been a person? Or equivalently can you price by marginal productivity? If you can take a human doctor and make them much more productive because you give them AI, can you price as a percentage of the productivity uplift?” Marc argues that high prices are under-appreciated by founders: “The naive view on pricing is the lower the pricing, the better it is for the customer. The more sophisticated way of looking at it is that higher prices are often good for the customer because the higher price means the vendor can make the product better, faster. Companies with higher prices and higher margins can actually invest more in R&D and make the product better. Most people who buy things aren’t just looking for the cheapest price. They want something that’s going to work really well.” Marc also emphasizes this point in an interview in Elad Gil’s High Growth Handbook: “What I hear from companies is, ‘Oh, we have an awesome moat, and we’re still going to price our product cheap, because we think that’s somehow going to maximize our business.’ I’m always urging founders to raise prices, raise prices, raise prices. I’m always urging founders to raise prices, raise prices, raise prices. First of all, raising prices is a great way to flesh out whether you actually do have a moat. If you do have a moat, the customers will still buy, because they have to. The definition of a moat is the ability to charge more. And so number one, it’s just a good way to flesh out that topic and really expose it to sunlight. And then number two, companies that charge more can better fund both their distribution efforts and their ongoing R&D efforts. Charging more is a key lever to be able to grow. And the companies that charge more therefore tend to grow faster. That’s counterintuitive to a lot of engineers. A lot of engineers think there’s a one-dimensional relationship between price and value. They have this mental model of commerce like they’re selling rice or something. It’s like, “My product is magical and nobody can replicate it, and I need to price it like it’s a commodity.” No, you don’t. In fact, quite the opposite. If you price it high, then you can fund a much more expensive sales and marketing effort, which means you’re much more likely to win the market, which means you’re much more likely to be able afford to do all the R&D and acquisitions you’re going to want to do. And so we always try to snap people into a two-dimensional mindset, where higher prices equals faster growth.” Source: a16z (Jan 2026)

Startup Archive

164,913 görüntüleme • 8 gün önce

$ABCL CEO Carl Hansen explains the net negative overall value creation in biotech and how AbCellera plans to beat it: “I really think it can be beat because there’s a lot of mistakes that get made in where you allocate capital.” “If you’re a biotech and you start a company on a drug, and you go public and have a drug, and now the data is looking not that great, you just keep running that drug. … Because if you quit that drug, the company is done.” “So, because you’re so concentrated on one thing, you end up having blinders. It’s like a cult of a molecule. And even a real, practical, capital access problem that makes you continue to move things forward” ______________________________________ “Another problem is that many of the drugs that get started, get started by people who don’t understand the competitive or commercial landscape and have no intent of ever actually manufacturing it. … Because they know someone else is going to buy it. So then their framework is not ‘Am I making a drug that’s going to make a difference for people?’ The framework is ‘Can I make something that I think someone will take off my hands?’ And that happens a lot.” “There are many acquisitions where a big pharma company spends $10B, $20B, and it’s a complete bust. So really no value is generated for patients but someone was able to get a good exit on that because they anticipated what someone would want. And a lot of decision making gets done like that”. _______________________________________ “I’m not saying that we have this all solved. But what we’re trying to do is create a framework where we are able to take many bets so that we don’t fall in love with anything, or we don’t have to fall in love with anything. … And then always hold up very explicitly what we know and what we don’t know along the dimensions that matter. The dimensions that matter are - Will it work? That’s a science. - When it gets where will people care? - Is it differentiated? - Does it solve a big problem? In order to get it there, is there a path with our resources and expertise that would allow us to see it through?” “When you start to hold things up like that, you start to see where the mistakes are, where the uncertainties are, and you can be more rational in deciding ‘We’re going to run it to here because we get to flip the card and if the card goes the wrong way we’re going to kill it because we’ve got something else behind it.’” “I do think that if done right, and if you can pick the right opportunities, the success rate can be well higher than an order of magnitude better. … And there are examples of this… companies I’ve mentioned, you know, Regeneron, their success rate is at least 10x the industry in bringing programs forward and getting them approved. … So it’s… you can do it better that way”

Jack Prescott

27,317 görüntüleme • 10 gün önce