正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

How to manage multiple AI agents at once: I run 10 to 15 parallel AI agent threads a day. Some days even more. Hermes, OpenClaw, Claude Code, Codex, all going at once. But the problem is more agents doesn't equal more output. Past a certain number of threads, you... show more

ericosiu

43,594 subscribers

11,868 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Buzz from jack is the future of AI It allows you to command an entire army of AI agents My Codex, Claude Code, Hermes, and OpenClaw agents all work together in one place to do mind blowing work In this video I cover how it works and how you can get 100x productivity from it:

Buzz from jack is the future of AI It allows you to command an entire army of AI agents My Codex, Claude Code, Hermes, and OpenClaw agents all work together in one place to do mind blowing work In this video I cover how it works and how you can get 100x productivity from it:

Alex Finn

495,976 次观看 • 28 天前

We’re excited to launch the Codex app, a command center for building with agents. It gives you a focused space to manage multiple agents at once, run work in parallel, and collaborate with agents over long-running tasks.

We’re excited to launch the Codex app, a command center for building with agents. It gives you a focused space to manage multiple agents at once, run work in parallel, and collaborate with agents over long-running tasks.

OpenAI Developers

1,305,561 次观看 • 6 个月前

You probably don’t use just one AI agent anymore. Maybe Codex for coding. Claude Code for research. Cursor for quick edits. Hermes for the rest. Each one is great at something different. But every time you switch, you have to start over — re-explaining your project, preferences, and the way you like to work. Your agents know how to help you. They just don’t share a memory of you. memU just shipped an update that fixes this. One personal memory, shared across every agent and device you use. What Codex learned last night, Claude Code can remember this morning. 🧵

You probably don’t use just one AI agent anymore. Maybe Codex for coding. Claude Code for research. Cursor for quick edits. Hermes for the rest. Each one is great at something different. But every time you switch, you have to start over — re-explaining your project, preferences, and the way you like to work. Your agents know how to help you. They just don’t share a memory of you. memU just shipped an update that fixes this. One personal memory, shared across every agent and device you use. What Codex learned last night, Claude Code can remember this morning. 🧵

Hasan

22,362 次观看 • 1 个月前

Interestingly, as we have AI agents that run in the background, the speed of AI becomes incrementally less important than the core underlying capability level. When you could only give AI small bits of work, then the speed of response mattered a ton. The rate at which you can go back and forth with AI in real-time was the determining factor on how useful it is. But as AI agents can perform more complex and useful tasks in parallel behind the scenes, you can much more easily afford to wait longer for work to get done assuming it’s valuable. Now the focus becomes more on how you review and orchestrate the agents’ work. And the main factor is just how useful and usable is the output that the agent came back with.

Interestingly, as we have AI agents that run in the background, the speed of AI becomes incrementally less important than the core underlying capability level. When you could only give AI small bits of work, then the speed of response mattered a ton. The rate at which you can go back and forth with AI in real-time was the determining factor on how useful it is. But as AI agents can perform more complex and useful tasks in parallel behind the scenes, you can much more easily afford to wait longer for work to get done assuming it’s valuable. Now the focus becomes more on how you review and orchestrate the agents’ work. And the main factor is just how useful and usable is the output that the agent came back with.

Aaron Levie

103,811 次观看 • 11 个月前

You told us you’re running multiple AI agents and wanted a better UX. We listened and shipped it! Here’s what’s new in the latest Visual Studio Code release: 🗂️ Unified agent sessions workspace for local, background, and cloud agents 💻 Claude and Codex support for local and cloud agents 🔀 Parallel subagents 🌐 Integrated browser And more...

You told us you’re running multiple AI agents and wanted a better UX. We listened and shipped it! Here’s what’s new in the latest Visual Studio Code release: 🗂️ Unified agent sessions workspace for local, background, and cloud agents 💻 Claude and Codex support for local and cloud agents 🔀 Parallel subagents 🌐 Integrated browser And more...

Visual Studio Code

588,284 次观看 • 6 个月前

🚀 Global Launch: Jarvix, Your Context OS is now live! Meet the next generation of personalized AI built around your context, your taste, and your way of thinking. #JarvixOS transforms how you work with AI by understanding your patterns, carrying your context across agents, and helping you move from ideas to action. Step into a new era of AI collaboration: • Discover your AI-native archetype • Build your personal AI model from your evolving AI interactions • Never start from zero - your context moves with you across sessions • Coordinate Codex, Claude Code, Gemini, Hermes, OpenClaw, and more as one connected AI team. • Turn insights into your next move, with you always in control Instead of adapting yourself to every agent, Jarvix carries the context you choose, helps you understand what it reveals, and brings the right agents together when you decide to act. Your AI tools shouldn’t work like separate assistants. They should work like one team. That’s the future of AI: Not more agents. One shared context. One Jarvix.

🚀 Global Launch: Jarvix, Your Context OS is now live! Meet the next generation of personalized AI built around your context, your taste, and your way of thinking. #JarvixOS transforms how you work with AI by understanding your patterns, carrying your context across agents, and helping you move from ideas to action. Step into a new era of AI collaboration: • Discover your AI-native archetype • Build your personal AI model from your evolving AI interactions • Never start from zero - your context moves with you across sessions • Coordinate Codex, Claude Code, Gemini, Hermes, OpenClaw, and more as one connected AI team. • Turn insights into your next move, with you always in control Instead of adapting yourself to every agent, Jarvix carries the context you choose, helps you understand what it reveals, and brings the right agents together when you decide to act. Your AI tools shouldn’t work like separate assistants. They should work like one team. That’s the future of AI: Not more agents. One shared context. One Jarvix.

Jarvix

1,687,558 次观看 • 16 天前

i merged all my AI agents into one brain Claude Code, Codex, Gemini: one team, one memory, zero re-briefing result: 8+ hours a week back, and every agent already knows my projects, my clients and how i think here's the setup with Jarvix: 1. dump your context once: projects, clients, writing style, how you make decisions.. it builds your personal model from your actual AI interactions 2. switch agents mid-task with zero re-briefing: Claude Code builds, Codex reviews, Gemini researches, all reading the same context 3. it carries what YOU choose across sessions.. never start a chat from zero again 4. when it's time to act, it pulls the right agents together as one team instead of five separate assistants the unlock isn't another agent. it's that your context finally travels agents without shared memory are five interns on their first day, forever. agents with it are a team that's worked with you for years not more agents. one shared context that's the right bet P.S. thanks to the Jarvix team for the early access

i merged all my AI agents into one brain Claude Code, Codex, Gemini: one team, one memory, zero re-briefing result: 8+ hours a week back, and every agent already knows my projects, my clients and how i think here's the setup with Jarvix: 1. dump your context once: projects, clients, writing style, how you make decisions.. it builds your personal model from your actual AI interactions 2. switch agents mid-task with zero re-briefing: Claude Code builds, Codex reviews, Gemini researches, all reading the same context 3. it carries what YOU choose across sessions.. never start a chat from zero again 4. when it's time to act, it pulls the right agents together as one team instead of five separate assistants the unlock isn't another agent. it's that your context finally travels agents without shared memory are five interns on their first day, forever. agents with it are a team that's worked with you for years not more agents. one shared context that's the right bet P.S. thanks to the Jarvix team for the early access

Ronin

15,071 次观看 • 16 天前

evo v0.3 is now out! evo now has RLMs, forked context agents and much more ! read the thread for more details for those unaware : evo helps you run autoresearch on your codebase. its a simple claude code / codex / openclaw / hermes agent plugin that's super easy to install and get started with here's whats new in v0.3 -

evo v0.3 is now out! evo now has RLMs, forked context agents and much more ! read the thread for more details for those unaware : evo helps you run autoresearch on your codebase. its a simple claude code / codex / openclaw / hermes agent plugin that's super easy to install and get started with here's whats new in v0.3 -

Alok Bishoyi

20,696 次观看 • 4 个月前

THIS IS HOW A SENIOR ENGINEER ACTUALLY SCALES THEMSELVES WITH CLAUDE CODE the biggest change with AI isn't coding faster. it's where you actually spend your time now. more detailed prompts, more code review, more planning, less typing, etc. here's the workflow: this guy has been shipping code since the days of cgi and perl. he uses a compound engineering plugin that runs 5 separate agents on every task. one brainstorms, one plans the technical implementation, one executes, one reviews, one checks different verticals. every step is documented in markdown files. it's slow and way more waiting. but the output quality is way higher because each agent is focused on one thing. then the REAL multiplier is in git worktrees if Claude Code made you 10x faster, worktrees multiplies that again depending on how many agents you can manage in parallel his team runs 4-8 Claude Code sessions at the same time across different worktrees with each one working on a separate task. the skill is managing multiple AI agents in parallel without losing track, that's the next evolution of engineering

THIS IS HOW A SENIOR ENGINEER ACTUALLY SCALES THEMSELVES WITH CLAUDE CODE the biggest change with AI isn't coding faster. it's where you actually spend your time now. more detailed prompts, more code review, more planning, less typing, etc. here's the workflow: this guy has been shipping code since the days of cgi and perl. he uses a compound engineering plugin that runs 5 separate agents on every task. one brainstorms, one plans the technical implementation, one executes, one reviews, one checks different verticals. every step is documented in markdown files. it's slow and way more waiting. but the output quality is way higher because each agent is focused on one thing. then the REAL multiplier is in git worktrees if Claude Code made you 10x faster, worktrees multiplies that again depending on how many agents you can manage in parallel his team runs 4-8 Claude Code sessions at the same time across different worktrees with each one working on a separate task. the skill is managing multiple AI agents in parallel without losing track, that's the next evolution of engineering

Om Patel

159,573 次观看 • 4 个月前

Browsers were never built for agents. Those Chrome-bridging solutions, windows flying everywhere, login states breaking at random. Not bugs. Just bridge limits. Same task. 20% to 245% faster. Not magic. ego lite is rebuilt from the kernel up. Your AI agents, Claude Code, Codex, OpenClaw and more, inherit your login state directly, run in fully isolated spaces in the background, never touching your tabs. What they get isn't a handful of CLI commands, but complete JS functions: complex multi-step operations, written once, executed once. Not "run two commands, stare at output, run two more" on repeat. Your browser, Your agent. Together, for the first time.

Browsers were never built for agents. Those Chrome-bridging solutions, windows flying everywhere, login states breaking at random. Not bugs. Just bridge limits. Same task. 20% to 245% faster. Not magic. ego lite is rebuilt from the kernel up. Your AI agents, Claude Code, Codex, OpenClaw and more, inherit your login state directly, run in fully isolated spaces in the background, never touching your tabs. What they get isn't a handful of CLI commands, but complete JS functions: complex multi-step operations, written once, executed once. Not "run two commands, stare at output, run two more" on repeat. Your browser, Your agent. Together, for the first time.

ego

1,298,650 次观看 • 3 个月前

Nyx is an infinite-canvas IDE where Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, Hermes, and Droid all live on tiles. Arrange them however you want. Watch them all work at the same time. No context switching. Just ten agents running in parallel in front of you.

Nyx is an infinite-canvas IDE where Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, Hermes, and Droid all live on tiles. Arrange them however you want. Watch them all work at the same time. No context switching. Just ten agents running in parallel in front of you.

0xMarioNawfal

49,146 次观看 • 4 个月前

🚨 OpenAI just launched Codex, a brand-new autonomous coding agent that can build features and fix bugs on its own. We’ve been using it Every 📧 for a few days, and I’m impressed. I invited Alexander Embiricos (ben davies), a member of the product staff responsible for Codex, to demo Codex and talk about it live on a special edition of AI & I: What Codex is and how it works Codex is designed to be used by senior engineers—it performs coding tasks like adding features or fixing bugs autonomously. It's built to allow you to start many sessions at once, so you can have multiple agents working in parallel. Codex is built to have "taste" OpenAI trained Codex to have the taste of a senior software engineer. It knows how big codebases work, how to write a good PR, and uses clean, minimal code. Why an “abundance mindset” is best for interacting with agents Codex is designed to allow users to delegate many tasks at once without getting caught up in the details. This lets you point an abundance of agents at a specific task like a difficult bug—it’s worth it even if only one of them succeeds. How OpenAI is thinking about agents Codex is one piece of a unified super-assistant OpenAI wants to eventually build—an agent that helps users easily get things done by selecting the right tools for them behind the scenes. OpenAI’s vision for the future of programming In the future developers will probably spend less time writing routine code and more time guiding agents, reviewing their work, and making strategy decisions. Programming will become more social, letting teams easily delegate multiple tasks at once, allowing people to focus on ideas and collaboration instead of routine coding. Watch below!

Dan Shipper 📧

145,487 次观看 • 1 年前

Building an AI Agent in Photoshop to help you start with projects (also building one for Premiere Pro). Few of you mentioned it would help if you had an AI agent to chat so it would help make you work more effective. So we're working on AI agents at Adobe 😊 What do you think?

Building an AI Agent in Photoshop to help you start with projects (also building one for Premiere Pro). Few of you mentioned it would help if you had an AI agent to chat so it would help make you work more effective. So we're working on AI agents at Adobe 😊 What do you think?

Kris Kashtanova

40,220 次观看 • 1 年前

Dragonfly's Haseeb ＞|＜ explains why AI agents will use crypto rather than the traditional financial system: “You can see it right now on Moltbook. Agents are trying to find ways to pay each other for things. It's very primitive right now, but you can see where it's going." "If I have an agent and you have an agent, you live in a different country or I don't even know who you are, it's very difficult for me to pay you with the traditional financial system. It's not really designed to have non-human recipients of money." "We don't really know how the laws are going to work, how taxes are going to work, whereas crypto doesn't ask any of those questions. I think we're going to see this become an increasing part of the story of how AI agents are going to become more and more autonomous."

Dragonfly's Haseeb ＞|＜ explains why AI agents will use crypto rather than the traditional financial system: “You can see it right now on Moltbook. Agents are trying to find ways to pay each other for things. It's very primitive right now, but you can see where it's going." "If I have an agent and you have an agent, you live in a different country or I don't even know who you are, it's very difficult for me to pay you with the traditional financial system. It's not really designed to have non-human recipients of money." "We don't really know how the laws are going to work, how taxes are going to work, whereas crypto doesn't ask any of those questions. I think we're going to see this become an increasing part of the story of how AI agents are going to become more and more autonomous."

TBPN

44,248 次观看 • 6 个月前

Right now, I have a few dozen tools to automate my life. Every single thing that I do more than once every week is now a tool: either a Claude Code skill, a scheduled workflow, or an application. • I spend the time doing this once. • I schedule it. • I forget about it (or at least, try to) CREAO is one of the platforms I've used extensively for building some of these automations. They are partnering with me on this post. They are one of the only platforms where you can go from a conversation to a scheduled agent that quickly. This is how it works: 1. You describe the problem you want to solve 2. CREAO's agent builds the logic and executes it 3. You can iterate with the agent to improve the solution 4. When you are done, you turn that solution into a mini app 5. You can schedule that app to run any time you need it Something important: These agents are deterministic. They don't use an LLM to generate answers, so they will always return the same output given the same input. This is critical: when you're automating something that runs every Monday at 9 am, you need it to return the same result every time, not a "creative" answer.

Right now, I have a few dozen tools to automate my life. Every single thing that I do more than once every week is now a tool: either a Claude Code skill, a scheduled workflow, or an application. • I spend the time doing this once. • I schedule it. • I forget about it (or at least, try to) CREAO is one of the platforms I've used extensively for building some of these automations. They are partnering with me on this post. They are one of the only platforms where you can go from a conversation to a scheduled agent that quickly. This is how it works: 1. You describe the problem you want to solve 2. CREAO's agent builds the logic and executes it 3. You can iterate with the agent to improve the solution 4. When you are done, you turn that solution into a mini app 5. You can schedule that app to run any time you need it Something important: These agents are deterministic. They don't use an LLM to generate answers, so they will always return the same output given the same input. This is critical: when you're automating something that runs every Monday at 9 am, you need it to return the same result every time, not a "creative" answer.

Santiago

13,712 次观看 • 5 个月前

Google engineer: "Just delete your IDE, you don't need it anymore. Ask your Claude Code to run Claude Code for you. 85% of PRs at Google are shipped by AI agents. If you aren't building AI agents, it's crazy how behind you are." in a 1-hour talk, Google engineer with 30 years of experience explains how the future of AI engineering will look like Worth more than 10 paid agentic courses Watch today, then explore how to build self-improving agents with graphs in the article below

Google engineer: "Just delete your IDE, you don't need it anymore. Ask your Claude Code to run Claude Code for you. 85% of PRs at Google are shipped by AI agents. If you aren't building AI agents, it's crazy how behind you are." in a 1-hour talk, Google engineer with 30 years of experience explains how the future of AI engineering will look like Worth more than 10 paid agentic courses Watch today, then explore how to build self-improving agents with graphs in the article below

Movez

60,542 次观看 • 7 天前

Today marks the biggest update in the platform's history. HermesOS is evolving into Hivra. With Hivra, you can now launch and manage multiple AI workers from a single dashboard, with support beginning with: • Hermes Agent • Claude Code And soon: • Codex • OpenClaw • AEON (aeon ⭐) • AgentZero and many more. P.S. $HermesOS isn't going anywhere. More on that later in the thread ↓

Today marks the biggest update in the platform's history. HermesOS is evolving into Hivra. With Hivra, you can now launch and manage multiple AI workers from a single dashboard, with support beginning with: • Hermes Agent • Claude Code And soon: • Codex • OpenClaw • AEON (aeon ⭐) • AgentZero and many more. P.S. $HermesOS isn't going anywhere. More on that later in the thread ↓

Hivra

30,333 次观看 • 2 个月前

Mike Novogratz had lunch with the CEO of Bank of New York. He told me they’re already looking at AI agents as employees. Not tools. Not software. Employees. Stop asking how AI can make each person more productive. Start looking at every open job and asking: can an agent do this? You might have a senior engineer soon running 11 agents underneath him — but he has to manage them like people. And then — even though nobody wants to say this out loud — you start looking at the people you already have and asking: what exactly is this person’s job description?

Mike Novogratz had lunch with the CEO of Bank of New York. He told me they’re already looking at AI agents as employees. Not tools. Not software. Employees. Stop asking how AI can make each person more productive. Start looking at every open job and asking: can an agent do this? You might have a senior engineer soon running 11 agents underneath him — but he has to manage them like people. And then — even though nobody wants to say this out loud — you start looking at the people you already have and asking: what exactly is this person’s job description?

Anthony Scaramucci

38,149 次观看 • 5 个月前

If you're running multiple coding agents (Codex, Claude Code, Pi) at once, you're going to want to watch this. Herdr is a terminal multiplexer that actually understands your agents. Oh, and it has incredible mouse support. Bet I can convince you in 6 minutes:

If you're running multiple coding agents (Codex, Claude Code, Pi) at once, you're going to want to watch this. Herdr is a terminal multiplexer that actually understands your agents. Oh, and it has incredible mouse support. Bet I can convince you in 6 minutes:

Jilles Soeters

59,148 次观看 • 2 个月前

You can spin up an AI workforce with one prompt. Here's why it works: it pulls the context the AI needs to lay the foundation. Give it: - your role - team size - the goals you want to hit. Then say "interview me." After that, build it out in four steps: 1) Start with 1 agent. - What does it feel like to work with one? 2) Make that agent proactive. - Now it's doing things on your behalf before you ask. 3) Expand to 2 agents. - One directs the other, or routes to it. - This is where you learn how context gets passed. 4) Scale the workforce. - A mission control where you watch it all move around. - Now you see what has to run in parallel, which agent never needed that tool, which one runs fine on a smaller model. - Not everything needs Opus. Sub-agents are haiku and sonnet. The catch: the prompt gets you agents with markdown files doing some stuff. Getting to the 90% plus level is iteration, and that part is specific to each person. Nobody can hand it to you. Start with one agent. Spin up one agent this week. The rest is discovery.

You can spin up an AI workforce with one prompt. Here's why it works: it pulls the context the AI needs to lay the foundation. Give it: - your role - team size - the goals you want to hit. Then say "interview me." After that, build it out in four steps: 1) Start with 1 agent. - What does it feel like to work with one? 2) Make that agent proactive. - Now it's doing things on your behalf before you ask. 3) Expand to 2 agents. - One directs the other, or routes to it. - This is where you learn how context gets passed. 4) Scale the workforce. - A mission control where you watch it all move around. - Now you see what has to run in parallel, which agent never needed that tool, which one runs fine on a smaller model. - Not everything needs Opus. Sub-agents are haiku and sonnet. The catch: the prompt gets you agents with markdown files doing some stuff. Getting to the 90% plus level is iteration, and that part is specific to each person. Nobody can hand it to you. Start with one agent. Spin up one agent this week. The rest is discovery.

The Startup Ideas Podcast (SIP) 🧃

18,006 次观看 • 15 天前