Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

HTTP Request Smuggling Lab Walkthrough: Confirming a CL.TE vulnerability via differential responses. How to identify CLTE Vulnerabilities: 1. Send request to repeater 2. Downgrade protocol to HTTP/1.1 3. Disable "Update Content-Length" 4. Set Content-Length to 6 5. Add "Transfer-Encoding: chunked" heading 6. Send a chunk with an invalid chunk...

26,360 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 2

Фото профиля A_dude
A_dude1 год назад

What's the impact pls?

Фото профиля SecBriefs | Making Cybersecurity Simple
SecBriefs | Making Cybersecurity Simple1 год назад

🧠Studying for #CompTIA #Security+ but struggling with #Cybersecurity terms?🔍 Cybersecurity Dictionary for Everyone covers everything you need to know and is available on Amazon!🔐 🚀Boost your Security+ prep with it today!💡

Похожие видео

How to Find Path Delimiter Issues with Burp Suite Intruder Sometimes web servers treat special characters (like ; or ?) differently in URLs. This can lead to security issues like web cache deception or access control problems. Here's how you can test for path delimiter discrepancies: 1️⃣ Capture the Request Find a request you want to test GET /my-account HTTP/2 2️⃣ Right click the request and "Send to Intruder". In Intruder, highlight add a new position after /my-account followed by abc. It should look like this: GET /my-account§§abc HTTP/2 Attack Type = Sniper (only changing one spot). Payload: Paste a list of special characters, like this: ! # $ % & ' ( ) * + , - . / : ; = ? @ [ \ ] _ ~ ... A full list of delimiters can be found here: 3️⃣ Start the Attack Press Start Attack. Look at the Status, Length, and Response columns. Watch for differences (like bigger/smaller pages, changes to status code or different behavior) and if you notice something different then you've likely found a delimiter discrepancy! 🎉 Why is this important? When special characters confuse the server or cache, you might find: 🔸 Web cache deception: Caching personal pages by accident 🔸 Access bypass: Skipping security checks 🔸 Leaked info: Seeing data you shouldn't Try this lab for yourself and dive even deeper into how to exploit this when you find it: #BugBounty #WebSecurity #BurpSuite #EthicalHacking #Cybersecurity

Web Security Academy

18,220 просмотров • 1 год назад

Production traffic is not uniform. You get a few requests that need your best model, but most are simple questions and lookups you can solve with cheaper, faster models. The most expensive mistake you can make today is sending every request to your strongest model. You need routing. Period. This is the simplest trick to improve the architecture of whatever you are building. Please, don't implement routing yourself. You don't have to. I'm currently working with TrueFoundry's Auto Routing. It reads each request, classifies it as simple, medium, or complex, and sends it to the model assigned to that tier. You have two choices: 1. Send every request to the free heuristic classifier to score signals such as technical vocabulary, code, prompt length, and multi-step reasoning. 2. Send the request to an LLM classifier when its difficulty requires a more nuanced judgment. The beauty of using routing is that nothing changes in your code. You still call a single endpoint model, but routing works behind the scenes to pair every request with the best possible model. TrueFoundry ran several experiments with two different setups: 1. Send every request to Claude Opus 2. Send every request to a router with Haiku, Sonnet, and Opus The first experiment ran 550 deterministically graded academic prompts through every setup. Auto Routing was 69% cheaper while retaining 98% of the baseline quality. The second experiment ran three production-shaped workloads through every setup, using user chats, developer chats, and long agent tasks. Auto Routing was 80% cheaper. Thanks to the TrueFoundry team for partnering with me on this post.

Santiago

13,446 просмотров • 2 дней назад