Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

🚨 HUGE! Supreme Court observes that restricting temple entry to specific denominations could HARM HINDUISM's inclusive nature. Centre argues: "Hinduism places women on a PEDESTAL HIGHER than men, not just as equals."🔥 Centre argues: "Some temples also restrict entry for men. The Sabarimala restriction on women of a certain... show more

The Analyzer (News Updates🗞️)

139,943 subscribers

86,331 views • 5 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🚨 HUGE! Centre strongly backs the age-old restriction on women aged 10-50 from entering the Sabarimala Ayyappa Temple in Supreme Court 🤯 -> Govt clarified: This is not because of MENSTRUATION. Lord Ayyappa temples worldwide are open to women of all ages. Only this one temple has the tradition🎯 "It is a matter of faith. It is a matter of belief." The Centre has also strongly protested the Supreme Court’s earlier remark calling the restriction a form of "UNTOUCHABILITY"💥 Constitutional bench is hearing multiple cases on women’s entry in temples. WELCOME MOVE!

🚨 HUGE! Centre strongly backs the age-old restriction on women aged 10-50 from entering the Sabarimala Ayyappa Temple in Supreme Court 🤯 -> Govt clarified: This is not because of MENSTRUATION. Lord Ayyappa temples worldwide are open to women of all ages. Only this one temple has the tradition🎯 "It is a matter of faith. It is a matter of belief." The Centre has also strongly protested the Supreme Court’s earlier remark calling the restriction a form of "UNTOUCHABILITY"💥 Constitutional bench is hearing multiple cases on women’s entry in temples. WELCOME MOVE!

The Analyzer (News Updates🗞️)

311,387 views • 5 months ago

🚨 HUGE! Supreme Court makes strong observation on Sabarimala: "GENUINE women devotees wait till age 50 to enter the temple."🎯 Bench also said it does not want to play any part in the ANNIHILATION of a religion while interpreting religious freedoms. Indira Jaisingh argued in court: "First show there is actually a rule in books that bars female entry."

🚨 HUGE! Supreme Court makes strong observation on Sabarimala: "GENUINE women devotees wait till age 50 to enter the temple."🎯 Bench also said it does not want to play any part in the ANNIHILATION of a religion while interpreting religious freedoms. Indira Jaisingh argued in court: "First show there is actually a rule in books that bars female entry."

The Analyzer (News Updates🗞️)

101,547 views • 4 months ago

Those accusing BJP of drifting from Hindutva must answer if CONgress Govt at Centre would've done this? MODI SARKAR STRONGLY BACKS AGE-OLD TRADITION OF WOMEN AGED 10-50 NOT ENTERING SABARIMALA AYYAPPA TEMPLE in affidavit in Supreme Court. Govt has said: This is not because of Menstruation as Lord Ayyappa temples worldwide are open to women of all ages. BUT THIS TEMPLE HAS THE TRADITION OF NOT ALLOWING. Clear message to MiLords- 'It is a matter of faith. It is a matter of belief. Don't try to mess up with ONLY Hindu traditions & beliefs'. Simple! Modi Sarkar has also strongly protested Supreme Court’s earlier remark calling the restriction a form of 'Untouchability'. Women Rights are important, but not at cost of Religious Beliefs. Notably, Majority of Hindu Women (10-50 yrs) who have great faith in Traditions of Ayyappa Temple have refrained themselves from visiting temple even after Supreme Court's 'overstepping' 'liberal' verdict!

Those accusing BJP of drifting from Hindutva must answer if CONgress Govt at Centre would've done this? MODI SARKAR STRONGLY BACKS AGE-OLD TRADITION OF WOMEN AGED 10-50 NOT ENTERING SABARIMALA AYYAPPA TEMPLE in affidavit in Supreme Court. Govt has said: This is not because of Menstruation as Lord Ayyappa temples worldwide are open to women of all ages. BUT THIS TEMPLE HAS THE TRADITION OF NOT ALLOWING. Clear message to MiLords- 'It is a matter of faith. It is a matter of belief. Don't try to mess up with ONLY Hindu traditions & beliefs'. Simple! Modi Sarkar has also strongly protested Supreme Court’s earlier remark calling the restriction a form of 'Untouchability'. Women Rights are important, but not at cost of Religious Beliefs. Notably, Majority of Hindu Women (10-50 yrs) who have great faith in Traditions of Ayyappa Temple have refrained themselves from visiting temple even after Supreme Court's 'overstepping' 'liberal' verdict!

BhikuMhatre

37,021 views • 5 months ago

🚨 HUGE! Supreme Court claims it has authority to decide whether a religious practice is "SUPERSTITIOUS" or not🤯 - Centre hits back bluntly: "Your Lordships are experts in law, NOT IN RELIGION"💥👌🏻 "Even if a practice appears superstitious, it is NOT for the judiciary to declare it so and INTERFERE." The court is hearing petitions on women’s entry into religious places, including Sabarimala. Our take: The Supreme Court must stop playing religious reformer. Judges are not priests, not pandits, and certainly not arbiters of Hindu faith🎯 Leave Sanatan traditions to the believers. Stop this judicial overreach into matters of faith!🙏🏻

🚨 HUGE! Supreme Court claims it has authority to decide whether a religious practice is "SUPERSTITIOUS" or not🤯 - Centre hits back bluntly: "Your Lordships are experts in law, NOT IN RELIGION"💥👌🏻 "Even if a practice appears superstitious, it is NOT for the judiciary to declare it so and INTERFERE." The court is hearing petitions on women’s entry into religious places, including Sabarimala. Our take: The Supreme Court must stop playing religious reformer. Judges are not priests, not pandits, and certainly not arbiters of Hindu faith🎯 Leave Sanatan traditions to the believers. Stop this judicial overreach into matters of faith!🙏🏻

The Analyzer (News Updates🗞️)

432,837 views • 5 months ago

🚨 HUGE! Supreme Court affirms: "Hinduism is a Way of Life." Temple visits or rituals are not mandatory to be a Hindu. CJI remarked : “Even if an individual lights a LAMP inside his HUT, it is enough to prove his religion.” The Court also cautioned against challenging every religious practice, noting that Hinduism’s inclusive & flexible nature must be respected💥 A landmark observation that protects Sanatan Dharma from unnecessary interference and selective targeting.

🚨 HUGE! Supreme Court affirms: "Hinduism is a Way of Life." Temple visits or rituals are not mandatory to be a Hindu. CJI remarked : “Even if an individual lights a LAMP inside his HUT, it is enough to prove his religion.” The Court also cautioned against challenging every religious practice, noting that Hinduism’s inclusive & flexible nature must be respected💥 A landmark observation that protects Sanatan Dharma from unnecessary interference and selective targeting.

The Analyzer (News Updates🗞️)

251,402 views • 4 months ago

🚨 HUGE! Centre firmly opposes same-sex marriage in Supreme Court -> Govt bluntly tells the court that the DECRIMINALIZATION of adultery was "not a good law"🔥 Govt stated clearly: "In a country governed by democratic principles, it is always the MAJORITARIAN view which prevails, particularly when testing a law, because it is the majority that enacts the law."🎯 The Supreme Court had earlier struck down the criminalisation of adultery (Section 497 IPC), which prohibited cheating on one’s spouse. Strong stand by the Modi Government on marriage, family and societal values. 🔥🇮🇳

🚨 HUGE! Centre firmly opposes same-sex marriage in Supreme Court -> Govt bluntly tells the court that the DECRIMINALIZATION of adultery was "not a good law"🔥 Govt stated clearly: "In a country governed by democratic principles, it is always the MAJORITARIAN view which prevails, particularly when testing a law, because it is the majority that enacts the law."🎯 The Supreme Court had earlier struck down the criminalisation of adultery (Section 497 IPC), which prohibited cheating on one’s spouse. Strong stand by the Modi Government on marriage, family and societal values. 🔥🇮🇳

The Analyzer (News Updates🗞️)

162,302 views • 5 months ago

A heated courtroom moment unfolds in the Sabarimala Case, where the debate goes beyond law into the core of faith and constitutional rights. The argument centers on the unique identity of Sabarimala Temple, the only temple where Lord Ayyappa is worshipped as a Naishtik Brahmachari—an eternal celibate. The counsel argues that the restriction on women aged 10 to 50 is not about gender discrimination, but about preserving the very character and manifestation of the deity. According to the submission, this classification has a direct legal nexus with the temple’s identity, making it a valid distinction under constitutional principles. The claim is clear: this is not a blanket exclusion of women, but a context-specific religious practice tied to a deeply held belief.The bigger question raised—can courts or PIL petitioners question the authenticity of such a belief if it forms the very foundation of the deity’s existence? This isn’t just about entry into a temple anymore. It’s about where the line is drawn between faith and fundamental rights—and who gets to draw it. Abhishek Singhvi Sai Deepak J #sabarimala #temple #women #entry #supremecourtofindia

A heated courtroom moment unfolds in the Sabarimala Case, where the debate goes beyond law into the core of faith and constitutional rights. The argument centers on the unique identity of Sabarimala Temple, the only temple where Lord Ayyappa is worshipped as a Naishtik Brahmachari—an eternal celibate. The counsel argues that the restriction on women aged 10 to 50 is not about gender discrimination, but about preserving the very character and manifestation of the deity. According to the submission, this classification has a direct legal nexus with the temple’s identity, making it a valid distinction under constitutional principles. The claim is clear: this is not a blanket exclusion of women, but a context-specific religious practice tied to a deeply held belief.The bigger question raised—can courts or PIL petitioners question the authenticity of such a belief if it forms the very foundation of the deity’s existence? This isn’t just about entry into a temple anymore. It’s about where the line is drawn between faith and fundamental rights—and who gets to draw it. Abhishek Singhvi Sai Deepak J #sabarimala #temple #women #entry #supremecourtofindia

LawChakra

19,200 views • 4 months ago

Do you know? The Chaitanyam of every Temple affects the body of a Man and Woman differently. There are a quite many Hindu Temples where the entry of women/girls is prohibited. Now, lelis and wokes and the likes of parties like congress will always propagate it as a religious discrimination b'coz they just want to divide Hindus based on Caste, Sex or what not. But, do you know the actual reason why such rules are made for women in some temples. 1/3

Do you know? The Chaitanyam of every Temple affects the body of a Man and Woman differently. There are a quite many Hindu Temples where the entry of women/girls is prohibited. Now, lelis and wokes and the likes of parties like congress will always propagate it as a religious discrimination b'coz they just want to divide Hindus based on Caste, Sex or what not. But, do you know the actual reason why such rules are made for women in some temples. 1/3

Vibhu Vashisth 🇮🇳

103,481 views • 1 year ago

Wikipedia’s entry on Ali Khamenei is a master class in narrative framing, argues Ashley Rindsberg. “In the digital age, the contest over power is also a contest over narrative. And increasingly, that contest is playing out not just in streets and prisons, but in footnotes, revisions, and the quiet authority of supposedly neutral platforms.”

Wikipedia’s entry on Ali Khamenei is a master class in narrative framing, argues Ashley Rindsberg. “In the digital age, the contest over power is also a contest over narrative. And increasingly, that contest is playing out not just in streets and prisons, but in footnotes, revisions, and the quiet authority of supposedly neutral platforms.”

The Free Press

36,873 views • 6 months ago

🚨🇬🇧 Manchester, UK “WHERE AM I GOING?” Reports Police were forcing young British men & women out of certain areas in favour of other demographics within the City. This as other clips are emerging of Police denying entry & arresting citizens merely trying access a shopping centre. Britain is not ok ‼️

🚨🇬🇧 Manchester, UK “WHERE AM I GOING?” Reports Police were forcing young British men & women out of certain areas in favour of other demographics within the City. This as other clips are emerging of Police denying entry & arresting citizens merely trying access a shopping centre. Britain is not ok ‼️

Concerned Citizen

1,969,643 views • 1 year ago

🚨 BREAKING: Centre’s BLUNT reply to Supreme Court on Presidential timeline judgment. ~ "Can the Court pick up pen and paper and REWRITE the Constitution?" – Attorney General to Milords🔥 President treated as an "Ordinary statutory Authority", argues Solicitor General. ~ "Not every problem has a solution in the COURT OF LAW."🎯 Judiciary vs Executive: The red line debate is out in the open. Modi Govt is not holding back anymore 💀

🚨 BREAKING: Centre’s BLUNT reply to Supreme Court on Presidential timeline judgment. ~ "Can the Court pick up pen and paper and REWRITE the Constitution?" – Attorney General to Milords🔥 President treated as an "Ordinary statutory Authority", argues Solicitor General. ~ "Not every problem has a solution in the COURT OF LAW."🎯 Judiciary vs Executive: The red line debate is out in the open. Modi Govt is not holding back anymore 💀

The Analyzer (News Updates🗞️)

175,869 views • 1 year ago

Kate Hudson says MEN libido goes down as men age and most men become so weak in bed as they hit late twenties of age, Kate also says the concept of women having low sex drive as they grow older is wrong and a propaganda pushed by the MANOSPHERE just to be with younger women.. Kate says women libido grow higher and increases as they age 👀👀 ‘Men’s libido kinda go down as they age so when a man that is past late twenties is highly active, he is definitely on something or just so obsessed. The concept of women having low urge as they age is a false propaganda pushed by men just so they could be with younger women because women libido and experience increases as they age’ 👀👀

Sensitive content

Kate Hudson says MEN libido goes down as men age and most men become so weak in bed as they hit late twenties of age, Kate also says the concept of women having low sex drive as they grow older is wrong and a propaganda pushed by the MANOSPHERE just to be with younger women.. Kate says women libido grow higher and increases as they age 👀👀 ‘Men’s libido kinda go down as they age so when a man that is past late twenties is highly active, he is definitely on something or just so obsessed. The concept of women having low urge as they age is a false propaganda pushed by men just so they could be with younger women because women libido and experience increases as they age’ 👀👀

hyz

62,534 views • 12 days ago

🚨 BREAKING! Modi Govt Tells Supreme Court: Won’t Withdraw 2,700 FIRs Against Persons With Heinous Criminal Antecedents!😂🔥 Centre has taken a firm stand. SC’s CJI Surya Kant-led bench had clarified that FIRs against those ALREADY ACCUSED of grave & heinous offences need not be withdrawn 🎯 Govt said clearly: “We cannot do anything that may demoralise the police.”👏🏻 Strong message in favour of law enforcement. No soft approach on serious crime. Thoughts?

🚨 BREAKING! Modi Govt Tells Supreme Court: Won’t Withdraw 2,700 FIRs Against Persons With Heinous Criminal Antecedents!😂🔥 Centre has taken a firm stand. SC’s CJI Surya Kant-led bench had clarified that FIRs against those ALREADY ACCUSED of grave & heinous offences need not be withdrawn 🎯 Govt said clearly: “We cannot do anything that may demoralise the police.”👏🏻 Strong message in favour of law enforcement. No soft approach on serious crime. Thoughts?

The Analyzer (News Updates🗞️)

489,292 views • 1 month ago

Watch this. India had 31000 rapes in 2022. That is 85 a day. About 29% of women between age group of 18 to 49 experience domestic violence. As I write this, a nurse was allegedly raped by a doctor in Uttar Pradesh, yesterday. If you want to stop the exploitation of women, we need to make sure that they are in position of power and influence law and policy. Gender sensitivity starts with ceding power to women. Men should not decide for women. Of the 30 cabinet ministers, just 2 are women. Of the 32 CMs, just one is a woman. Only 13% IAS officers were women. Only 12% police force is women. In IAS, while the selection ratio has grown to 34%, very few raise to be collectors and most stop at being DMs or posted in welfare, culture and education departments. And the ratio of women IAS officers taking voluntary retirements is 4 times more than men. Watch this data analysis based on gender representation in IPS, IAS, STEM, MBBS, UG, PG.

Watch this. India had 31000 rapes in 2022. That is 85 a day. About 29% of women between age group of 18 to 49 experience domestic violence. As I write this, a nurse was allegedly raped by a doctor in Uttar Pradesh, yesterday. If you want to stop the exploitation of women, we need to make sure that they are in position of power and influence law and policy. Gender sensitivity starts with ceding power to women. Men should not decide for women. Of the 30 cabinet ministers, just 2 are women. Of the 32 CMs, just one is a woman. Only 13% IAS officers were women. Only 12% police force is women. In IAS, while the selection ratio has grown to 34%, very few raise to be collectors and most stop at being DMs or posted in welfare, culture and education departments. And the ratio of women IAS officers taking voluntary retirements is 4 times more than men. Watch this data analysis based on gender representation in IPS, IAS, STEM, MBBS, UG, PG.

Maheshwer Peri

36,724 views • 2 years ago

🚨 BIG NEWS! Centre firmly opposes plea in Supreme Court for Income-Based Sub-Quota within SC/ST/OBCs!🤯 > Govt makes it clear: Reservation is based on "historical & social backwardness", not just economic status. Petitioner wanted income-based preferences inside SC, ST, OBC and EWS categories for “more equitable” policy🎯 Centre’s blunt stand: The “creamy layer” concept was developed only for OBC reservations & does not apply to Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. Strong rejection of pure economic criteria.

🚨 BIG NEWS! Centre firmly opposes plea in Supreme Court for Income-Based Sub-Quota within SC/ST/OBCs!🤯 > Govt makes it clear: Reservation is based on "historical & social backwardness", not just economic status. Petitioner wanted income-based preferences inside SC, ST, OBC and EWS categories for “more equitable” policy🎯 Centre’s blunt stand: The “creamy layer” concept was developed only for OBC reservations & does not apply to Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. Strong rejection of pure economic criteria.

The Analyzer (News Updates🗞️)

330,097 views • 1 month ago

🚨 HUGE! Supreme Court has flagged a disturbing trend: — Women are increasingly "MISUSING Dowry and POCSO laws" as weapons against husbands & in-lawsb🤯 The Court observed that GENUINE cases are being buried under an overwhelming number of false complaints, often used as an “Arm-twisting tactic” to force better settlements. It stressed that judicial bodies must ensure the rights and freedoms of INNOCENT individuals are not destroyed through unscrupulous & baseless litigation. This is a significant statement acknowledging the misuse of gender-specific laws and the suffering of innocent men. Finally, the highest court is calling out this dangerous pattern💥

Sensitive content

🚨 HUGE! Supreme Court has flagged a disturbing trend: — Women are increasingly "MISUSING Dowry and POCSO laws" as weapons against husbands & in-lawsb🤯 The Court observed that GENUINE cases are being buried under an overwhelming number of false complaints, often used as an “Arm-twisting tactic” to force better settlements. It stressed that judicial bodies must ensure the rights and freedoms of INNOCENT individuals are not destroyed through unscrupulous & baseless litigation. This is a significant statement acknowledging the misuse of gender-specific laws and the suffering of innocent men. Finally, the highest court is calling out this dangerous pattern💥

The Analyzer (News Updates🗞️)

49,048 views • 3 months ago

The debate about #IstanbulConvention is not just about combating violence against women (all sane people oppose violence against women), but redefining what a woman is. According to this Convention, "gender" is not related to a biological sex anymore, but "the socially constructed roles, behaviours, activities and attributes that a given society considers appropriate for women and men". To claim that womanhood is not a reality in itself, but something so fluid, relative and uncertain so others – ie society – have to agree on what is or "considers appropriate" to be is simply absurd. If this is not the biggest threat to womanhood, then what is? Based on this aggressive gender ideology non-sense, a man can claim that he identifies as a car, and the society should give him a license plate, instead of an ID card. You can find below the exchange of views between myself and the socialist MEP Evin Incir debating this issue on May 9, 2023, in the European Parliament.

The debate about #IstanbulConvention is not just about combating violence against women (all sane people oppose violence against women), but redefining what a woman is. According to this Convention, "gender" is not related to a biological sex anymore, but "the socially constructed roles, behaviours, activities and attributes that a given society considers appropriate for women and men". To claim that womanhood is not a reality in itself, but something so fluid, relative and uncertain so others – ie society – have to agree on what is or "considers appropriate" to be is simply absurd. If this is not the biggest threat to womanhood, then what is? Based on this aggressive gender ideology non-sense, a man can claim that he identifies as a car, and the society should give him a license plate, instead of an ID card. You can find below the exchange of views between myself and the socialist MEP Evin Incir debating this issue on May 9, 2023, in the European Parliament.

Cristian Terhes MEP

49,064 views • 3 years ago

🔥 Andrew Wilson absolutely COOKED Konstantin Kisin over the issue of female privilege. There is an asymmetrical level of duty that men have to perform in society: they must sign up for the draft, but women don’t have to. Kisin argues that women are at a disadvantage as they have to carry a child to term, but Wilson RIGHTLY points out that women have a CHOICE on whether or not to have kids regardless of whether it’s their civilizational duty to do so. Men do NOT have that choice. Kisin, upon realizing that he’s walked himself into a corner, tries to shift his position by claiming to make an ontological argument about the responsibilities men and women have in their respective roles, but that isn’t what’s true in reality, is it?

🔥 Andrew Wilson absolutely COOKED Konstantin Kisin over the issue of female privilege. There is an asymmetrical level of duty that men have to perform in society: they must sign up for the draft, but women don’t have to. Kisin argues that women are at a disadvantage as they have to carry a child to term, but Wilson RIGHTLY points out that women have a CHOICE on whether or not to have kids regardless of whether it’s their civilizational duty to do so. Men do NOT have that choice. Kisin, upon realizing that he’s walked himself into a corner, tries to shift his position by claiming to make an ontological argument about the responsibilities men and women have in their respective roles, but that isn’t what’s true in reality, is it?

Ian Miles

187,077 views • 4 months ago

Louise Perry: “I don’t think that our culture is misogynist. Misogynists exist but that’s not typical.” She points instead to the “Women Are Wonderful” bias — where both men and women are more positively predisposed toward stories that celebrate female success or outcomes. Yet women are still often regarded like “your mum”: loved, protected, but not fully respected as equals. Perry argues women occupy this strange middle category — adjacent to children. We love them, but we don’t let children vote. The result? A pedestal mixed with subtle lower status. Do you see this pattern — women praised and protected more readily than men, yet still treated as slightly less serious or capable in certain domains? Or do you think we really do live in a culture that hates women? Your take 👇

Louise Perry: “I don’t think that our culture is misogynist. Misogynists exist but that’s not typical.” She points instead to the “Women Are Wonderful” bias — where both men and women are more positively predisposed toward stories that celebrate female success or outcomes. Yet women are still often regarded like “your mum”: loved, protected, but not fully respected as equals. Perry argues women occupy this strange middle category — adjacent to children. We love them, but we don’t let children vote. The result? A pedestal mixed with subtle lower status. Do you see this pattern — women praised and protected more readily than men, yet still treated as slightly less serious or capable in certain domains? Or do you think we really do live in a culture that hates women? Your take 👇

Camus

17,560 views • 5 months ago