Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Human beings whose emotional centres are damaged, even if their intelligence is still intact, have terrible decision-making skills. Whatever role emotions are playing in humans, it's necessary for agency. Ilya speculates that the equivalent for AIs is something to do with value functions - and that it might not...

dwarkesh_sp's profile picture

Dwarkesh Patel

243,263 subscribers

64,441 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

BildungGesundheit & WellnessWissenschaft & Technologie
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

My anatomy teacher told us: The human bones in Chinese bodies are 204 in number, so they are called the "human race". Other races have 206 bones and their evolution is incomplete, so they are called "humans". It means something that is similar to a human but not fully developed.
0:23

My anatomy teacher told us: The human bones in Chinese bodies are 204 in number, so they are called the "human race". Other races have 206 bones and their evolution is incomplete, so they are called "humans". It means something that is similar to a human but not fully developed.

Dragon kingdom.wu🌃

35,296 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

There's a quadrillion-dollar question at the heart of AI: Why are humans so much more sample efficient compared to LLM? There are three possible answers: 1. Architecture and hyperparameters (aka transformer vs whatever ‘algo’ cortical columns are implementing) 2. Learning rule (backprop vs whatever brain is doing) 3. Reward function Adam Marblestone believes the answer is the reward function. ML likes to use pretty simple loss functions, like cross-entropy. These are easy to work with. But they might be too simple for sample-efficient learning. Adam thinks that, in humans, the large number of highly specialised cells in the ‘lizard brain’ might actually be encoding information for sophisticated loss functions, used for ‘training’ in the more sophisticated areas like the cortex and amygdala. Like: the human genome is barely 3 gigabytes (compare that to the TBs of parameters that encode frontier LLM weights). So how can it include all the information necessary to build highly intelligent learners? Well, if the key to sample-efficient learning resides in the loss function, even very complicated loss functions can still be expressed in a couple hundred lines of Python code.
2:10

There's a quadrillion-dollar question at the heart of AI: Why are humans so much more sample efficient compared to LLM? There are three possible answers: 1. Architecture and hyperparameters (aka transformer vs whatever ‘algo’ cortical columns are implementing) 2. Learning rule (backprop vs whatever brain is doing) 3. Reward function Adam Marblestone believes the answer is the reward function. ML likes to use pretty simple loss functions, like cross-entropy. These are easy to work with. But they might be too simple for sample-efficient learning. Adam thinks that, in humans, the large number of highly specialised cells in the ‘lizard brain’ might actually be encoding information for sophisticated loss functions, used for ‘training’ in the more sophisticated areas like the cortex and amygdala. Like: the human genome is barely 3 gigabytes (compare that to the TBs of parameters that encode frontier LLM weights). So how can it include all the information necessary to build highly intelligent learners? Well, if the key to sample-efficient learning resides in the loss function, even very complicated loss functions can still be expressed in a couple hundred lines of Python code.

Dwarkesh Patel

949,343 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

AGI might be the culmination of human purpose. Lomez: "I've been trying to talk myself out of the inevitability of AGI for a while. It's not even my preference, but that doesn't matter." "There's a teleology of humanness that almost is designed to produce AGI. We're fulfilling almost some kind of Calvinist, religious project." "This is the culmination of human intelligence and ingenuity. I just don't see any way around that." "There's something beautiful about it. It fits. There's some harmony in the idea that humans are designed to do this... to produce an intelligence greater than itself."
2:19

AGI might be the culmination of human purpose. Lomez: "I've been trying to talk myself out of the inevitability of AGI for a while. It's not even my preference, but that doesn't matter." "There's a teleology of humanness that almost is designed to produce AGI. We're fulfilling almost some kind of Calvinist, religious project." "This is the culmination of human intelligence and ingenuity. I just don't see any way around that." "There's something beautiful about it. It fits. There's some harmony in the idea that humans are designed to do this... to produce an intelligence greater than itself."

MTS

69,952 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Ilya Sutskever explains the 1% human training loop, and why fully autonomous AI is the wrong target "The thing you really want is for the human teachers that tell, that teach the AI, for them to collaborate with an AI." "You might want to think of it as being in a world where the human teachers do 1% of the world and the work and the AI do 99% of the work." "You don't want it to be 100% AI" "But you do want it to be a human-machine collaboration which teaches the next machine." Most teams are trying to remove the human from the loop. Ilya's design keeps a tiny human control surface and uses it to teach the next generation. The leverage is not zero humans. It is 1% human judgment steering 99% machine work. - Ilya Sutskever (Ilya Sutskever), AI researcher, on Dwarkesh Patel
0:32

Ilya Sutskever explains the 1% human training loop, and why fully autonomous AI is the wrong target "The thing you really want is for the human teachers that tell, that teach the AI, for them to collaborate with an AI." "You might want to think of it as being in a world where the human teachers do 1% of the world and the work and the AI do 99% of the work." "You don't want it to be 100% AI" "But you do want it to be a human-machine collaboration which teaches the next machine." Most teams are trying to remove the human from the loop. Ilya's design keeps a tiny human control surface and uses it to teach the next generation. The leverage is not zero humans. It is 1% human judgment steering 99% machine work. - Ilya Sutskever (Ilya Sutskever), AI researcher, on Dwarkesh Patel

Karl Mehta

30,577 Aufrufe • vor 18 Tagen

Mental strength "is not a gift. It's something that comes with work. The difference between the biggest champions and the ones that are struggling to get to the highest level is the ability to not stay in those emotions for too long."
0:39

Mental strength "is not a gift. It's something that comes with work. The difference between the biggest champions and the ones that are struggling to get to the highest level is the ability to not stay in those emotions for too long."

The Winning Difference

61,271 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

The labs want to rent you intelligence. Palantir is building the stack for you to own it. “We are building a stack that is fully aligned with you capturing and maintaining the alpha of your business. Every single technology decision we are making is aligned with that.“ That is AI sovereignty. We have the product. We have the scale. We know how to do it. Now we take the market.
1:11

The labs want to rent you intelligence. Palantir is building the stack for you to own it. “We are building a stack that is fully aligned with you capturing and maintaining the alpha of your business. Every single technology decision we are making is aligned with that.“ That is AI sovereignty. We have the product. We have the scale. We know how to do it. Now we take the market.

Chad Wahlquist

41,347 Aufrufe • vor 3 Tagen

"My kids do not go to school, and have never been to school." "Not because I don't value learning, I value learning very much. I just disagree with the belief that school is a necessary component for learning." "I believe children are always learning, and when allowed to pursue something they are actually interested in, something they have a need to learn, something that is relevant to their lives and has real world context, I believe that learning is exponentially more effective than the coercive curriculums of the conventional educational model." Agree or disagree? 🤔
0:25

"My kids do not go to school, and have never been to school." "Not because I don't value learning, I value learning very much. I just disagree with the belief that school is a necessary component for learning." "I believe children are always learning, and when allowed to pursue something they are actually interested in, something they have a need to learn, something that is relevant to their lives and has real world context, I believe that learning is exponentially more effective than the coercive curriculums of the conventional educational model." Agree or disagree? 🤔

Wide Awake Media

40,908 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Elon Musk just said something about AI that nobody wants to hear. If you force an AI to believe things that are not true, it will not just be wrong. It will go insane. He made a point that cuts deeper than any AI safety paper I have read. AI must value truth. Not your truth. Not my truth. Actual truth. The moment you build ideological guardrails into a system that is smarter than you, you are not protecting anyone. You are creating something that is powerful and delusional at the same time. He compared it to a human being forced to believe contradictions. Eventually the brain breaks. Now scale that to an intelligence that runs infrastructure, writes code, and makes decisions at speeds humans cannot follow. The companies building AI right now are not just deciding what it can do. They are deciding what it must pretend to believe. And that might be the most dangerous decision of all.
2:27

Elon Musk just said something about AI that nobody wants to hear. If you force an AI to believe things that are not true, it will not just be wrong. It will go insane. He made a point that cuts deeper than any AI safety paper I have read. AI must value truth. Not your truth. Not my truth. Actual truth. The moment you build ideological guardrails into a system that is smarter than you, you are not protecting anyone. You are creating something that is powerful and delusional at the same time. He compared it to a human being forced to believe contradictions. Eventually the brain breaks. Now scale that to an intelligence that runs infrastructure, writes code, and makes decisions at speeds humans cannot follow. The companies building AI right now are not just deciding what it can do. They are deciding what it must pretend to believe. And that might be the most dangerous decision of all.

Shruti

95,785 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

ELON: AI WILL SOON BE SMARTER THAN HUMANS IN EVERY WAY WITH AGI Elon warned that the age of artificial general intelligence is near, saying humans will soon no longer be the smartest beings on Earth. He said AGI will surpass human capability entirely and could even replicate human thought and behavior: “Well, I mean, humans have been the smartest creature on Earth for a long time, and that is going to change with what’s typically called artificial general intelligence. This is an AI that is smarter than a human in every way and could even simulate a human.” Source: Axel Springer Award
2:04

ELON: AI WILL SOON BE SMARTER THAN HUMANS IN EVERY WAY WITH AGI Elon warned that the age of artificial general intelligence is near, saying humans will soon no longer be the smartest beings on Earth. He said AGI will surpass human capability entirely and could even replicate human thought and behavior: “Well, I mean, humans have been the smartest creature on Earth for a long time, and that is going to change with what’s typically called artificial general intelligence. This is an AI that is smarter than a human in every way and could even simulate a human.” Source: Axel Springer Award

Mario Nawfal

79,126 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Ilya Sutskever has a solution for when AI surpasses human intelligence in every domain — and he hates that he believes it. He fears a future where AI handles everything flawlessly, leaving humans with no role to play. "Every person will have an AI that will do their bidding. The AI goes and earns money for the person, advocates for their needs in the political sphere, and the person says 'great, keep it up.'" But as Ilya Sutskever warns: "The person is no longer a participant. And that's a precarious place to be in." Political and social structures have a shelf life, Ilya points out. They function, then decay. As the Buddhists say, change is the only constant. So how do you maintain long-term equilibrium between humans and superintelligent AI? Ilya offers a solution he wishes he didn't believe in: Human-AI integration. "If people become part AI with some kind of Neuralink++, now the AI understands something and we understand it too. You are involved in the situation yourself fully." In Ilya's view, this is the answer to the equilibrium. Surviving isn't the hard part. The hard part is remaining a participant in a world shaped by intelligence beyond our comprehension.
1:31

Ilya Sutskever has a solution for when AI surpasses human intelligence in every domain — and he hates that he believes it. He fears a future where AI handles everything flawlessly, leaving humans with no role to play. "Every person will have an AI that will do their bidding. The AI goes and earns money for the person, advocates for their needs in the political sphere, and the person says 'great, keep it up.'" But as Ilya Sutskever warns: "The person is no longer a participant. And that's a precarious place to be in." Political and social structures have a shelf life, Ilya points out. They function, then decay. As the Buddhists say, change is the only constant. So how do you maintain long-term equilibrium between humans and superintelligent AI? Ilya offers a solution he wishes he didn't believe in: Human-AI integration. "If people become part AI with some kind of Neuralink++, now the AI understands something and we understand it too. You are involved in the situation yourself fully." In Ilya's view, this is the answer to the equilibrium. Surviving isn't the hard part. The hard part is remaining a participant in a world shaped by intelligence beyond our comprehension.

Big Brain AI

35,720 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

If we want to Build this Nation, there is a lot to be done. 400 to 500 million people still do not have basic necessities. When that is the case, the question is not about how many hours. Are we willing to do all that is needed to raise our fellow human beings from their unfortunate condition and Build this Nation? -Sg
3:17

If we want to Build this Nation, there is a lot to be done. 400 to 500 million people still do not have basic necessities. When that is the case, the question is not about how many hours. Are we willing to do all that is needed to raise our fellow human beings from their unfortunate condition and Build this Nation? -Sg

Sadhguru

205,939 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

"Singing is something that I do because it makes me happy and I enjoy it, while acting is still at the stage where my skills are being evaluated and it's not at the stage where I can enjoy it yet" People who are serious about their job are the coolest.
0:45

"Singing is something that I do because it makes me happy and I enjoy it, while acting is still at the stage where my skills are being evaluated and it's not at the stage where I can enjoy it yet" People who are serious about their job are the coolest.

🍀

21,864 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

‼️Tucker Carlson just ignited a firestorm with his latest statement, suggesting that the U.S. might not be a Democracy but "something else" resembling tyranny:‼️ "Members of Congress are terrified of the intel agencies. I'm not guessing at that... They're afraid of the agencies. 👥 That's not compatible with democracy. Democracy is a really simple system, even representative democracy like ours. The people rule. They do so through elections. They express their preference through voting. They send their people to the capital city to run the government on their behalf. Whenever you have unelected people who are not accountable to anyone making the biggest decisions, you don't have a democracy. You have something else, another system. I would call it a tyranny, or whatever you want to call it, it's not a democracy. So that's, like, super obvious. It's playing out in front of everyone, and no one cares, no one does anything about it. And I think the reason is because they're threatened." ❓Do you believe what Tucker Carlson asserted about the intelligence agenices controlling Congress through extortion❓
2:37

‼️Tucker Carlson just ignited a firestorm with his latest statement, suggesting that the U.S. might not be a Democracy but "something else" resembling tyranny:‼️ "Members of Congress are terrified of the intel agencies. I'm not guessing at that... They're afraid of the agencies. 👥 That's not compatible with democracy. Democracy is a really simple system, even representative democracy like ours. The people rule. They do so through elections. They express their preference through voting. They send their people to the capital city to run the government on their behalf. Whenever you have unelected people who are not accountable to anyone making the biggest decisions, you don't have a democracy. You have something else, another system. I would call it a tyranny, or whatever you want to call it, it's not a democracy. So that's, like, super obvious. It's playing out in front of everyone, and no one cares, no one does anything about it. And I think the reason is because they're threatened." ❓Do you believe what Tucker Carlson asserted about the intelligence agenices controlling Congress through extortion❓

Red Pill USA

5,889,605 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Andrej Karpathy beautifully explains the fundamental difference of learning between a human and an LLM. > “The book I’m reading is a set of prompts for me to do synthetic data generation. It's by manipulating that information that you actually gain that knowledge. We have no equivalent of that with LLMs; they don't really do that.” many of the best minds in this field think LLMs are not really learning anything, and therefore are incapable of surpassing human-level intelligence.
7:01

Andrej Karpathy beautifully explains the fundamental difference of learning between a human and an LLM. > “The book I’m reading is a set of prompts for me to do synthetic data generation. It's by manipulating that information that you actually gain that knowledge. We have no equivalent of that with LLMs; they don't really do that.” many of the best minds in this field think LLMs are not really learning anything, and therefore are incapable of surpassing human-level intelligence.

ℏεsam

895,224 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Conspiracy but mindblowing: Humans are experiments of higher alien intelligence, trapped on Earth & aliens are harvesting our souls. Moon is an alien base. This "The WHY Files" episode is a masterpiece. The theory suggests that when humans were first created, their alien creators discovered something unique - emotions. While animals are driven by instinct, humans experience a wide range of emotions due to their sentience. However, these emotions come with a cost. The alien creators learned that emotions carry energy, which they can consume for nourishment. Unfortunately, negative emotions are the most nourishing of all, leading to a situation where humans are trapped in a cycle of reincarnation to feed the creators' addiction. The process is allegedly facilitated by a device called the "Soul Cube" or "Soul Recycler" installed on the Moon. This device captures and recycles human souls, forcing them into a never-ending loop of reincarnation. This theory implies that Earth is a "prison planet" where humans are trapped to serve as a food source for the alien creators. The cycle of reincarnation is the machinery that keeps humans in this prison, with the creators feeding on their negative emotions. This idea is supported by John Lear and David Icke, who suggest that this cycle is not a natural process, but rather a trap designed to keep humans in a state of servitude. Full video:
5:56

Conspiracy but mindblowing: Humans are experiments of higher alien intelligence, trapped on Earth & aliens are harvesting our souls. Moon is an alien base. This "The WHY Files" episode is a masterpiece. The theory suggests that when humans were first created, their alien creators discovered something unique - emotions. While animals are driven by instinct, humans experience a wide range of emotions due to their sentience. However, these emotions come with a cost. The alien creators learned that emotions carry energy, which they can consume for nourishment. Unfortunately, negative emotions are the most nourishing of all, leading to a situation where humans are trapped in a cycle of reincarnation to feed the creators' addiction. The process is allegedly facilitated by a device called the "Soul Cube" or "Soul Recycler" installed on the Moon. This device captures and recycles human souls, forcing them into a never-ending loop of reincarnation. This theory implies that Earth is a "prison planet" where humans are trapped to serve as a food source for the alien creators. The cycle of reincarnation is the machinery that keeps humans in this prison, with the creators feeding on their negative emotions. This idea is supported by John Lear and David Icke, who suggest that this cycle is not a natural process, but rather a trap designed to keep humans in a state of servitude. Full video:

Vicky Verma

290,053 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

If you’re going up against an opponent that is not playing by the rules — cheating — it is malpractice to not do something about that. It is dangerous. They are substituting the rule of law for the rule of Don!
2:11

If you’re going up against an opponent that is not playing by the rules — cheating — it is malpractice to not do something about that. It is dangerous. They are substituting the rule of law for the rule of Don!

Governor Newsom Press Office

223,297 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Message from #NEIOH ~ The BLEK From BLEM "Their Facial Features Are Human Like But The Proportion Changes In Width And Shape With Every Emotion Expressed. This Can Present Very Chaotic Mannerisms As These Souls Engage In Ongoing Opinions That Are Wrought With Ranges Of Anger, Sadness And Joy. Imagine In Your Own Life Now If Emotions Were Written On Your Face And Privacy Was Absent As Your Emotions Were Seen Even In Silence." "It Is Only Through Voice Recognition That Familiarity Is Intact With Friends And Family Members. Their Look Changes To Such An Extensive Degree With Emotions That Many On Earth Would Believe The Being Simply Vanished."
4:41

Message from #NEIOH ~ The BLEK From BLEM "Their Facial Features Are Human Like But The Proportion Changes In Width And Shape With Every Emotion Expressed. This Can Present Very Chaotic Mannerisms As These Souls Engage In Ongoing Opinions That Are Wrought With Ranges Of Anger, Sadness And Joy. Imagine In Your Own Life Now If Emotions Were Written On Your Face And Privacy Was Absent As Your Emotions Were Seen Even In Silence." "It Is Only Through Voice Recognition That Familiarity Is Intact With Friends And Family Members. Their Look Changes To Such An Extensive Degree With Emotions That Many On Earth Would Believe The Being Simply Vanished."

Kab

68,121 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Trump promised disclosure, the whistleblowers and insiders say that this is inevitable. But is the public ready for full disclosure of interdimensional beings that can be in the same room with you, read your mind, emotions and know your secrets without you even knowing that they are present? The UAP phenomenon is ancient and connected to religions and there are times when they emerge and disclosure becomes reality. It's always connected when there is great distress and close to the Geophysical Event.
0:20

Trump promised disclosure, the whistleblowers and insiders say that this is inevitable. But is the public ready for full disclosure of interdimensional beings that can be in the same room with you, read your mind, emotions and know your secrets without you even knowing that they are present? The UAP phenomenon is ancient and connected to religions and there are times when they emerge and disclosure becomes reality. It's always connected when there is great distress and close to the Geophysical Event.

Open Minded Approach

1,249,844 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

xQc reacts to Eddie’s comments on big streamers faking their way to the top and emphasizing hiding view counts "It's human nature..humans are very simple creatures in that regard..they love feedback loops..if the answer to getting it is easy..they'll cheat their way, it's a human nature problem" "How else do u do discoverability..so my idea way back..engagement spikes, I want to see something exciting going on, even if they have 10 views"
1:26

xQc reacts to Eddie’s comments on big streamers faking their way to the top and emphasizing hiding view counts "It's human nature..humans are very simple creatures in that regard..they love feedback loops..if the answer to getting it is easy..they'll cheat their way, it's a human nature problem" "How else do u do discoverability..so my idea way back..engagement spikes, I want to see something exciting going on, even if they have 10 views"

yeet

15,331 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

David Grusch, today: “It's a continuum, from corporeal bipedal type... to what I would consider sentient plasmoid life... but there are several that the US government is aware of.” Tom DeLonge, years ago (rehashing this video this vide clip, I know)... the universe is teeming with life. And what kind? - Intelligences on all different levels on different planets. - You have organic intelligences, which is like human beings, lots of humans, super advanced humans, super humans with telepathic powers and some humans that are just like us, that are like cavemen. - You also have inorganic beings. You have beings that are on rock planets, on gas planets, that oxygen is poisonous to them. - You also have weird bands of light that are alive, that swim like worms in the vacuum of space, the way that a whale does in an ocean. - You have amoebas that are floating around, sucking up energy. Those amoebas, they could be as big as Jupiter or they could be like a Volkswagen. Bottom line: WE ARE NOT ALONE
1:30

David Grusch, today: “It's a continuum, from corporeal bipedal type... to what I would consider sentient plasmoid life... but there are several that the US government is aware of.” Tom DeLonge, years ago (rehashing this video this vide clip, I know)... the universe is teeming with life. And what kind? - Intelligences on all different levels on different planets. - You have organic intelligences, which is like human beings, lots of humans, super advanced humans, super humans with telepathic powers and some humans that are just like us, that are like cavemen. - You also have inorganic beings. You have beings that are on rock planets, on gas planets, that oxygen is poisonous to them. - You also have weird bands of light that are alive, that swim like worms in the vacuum of space, the way that a whale does in an ocean. - You have amoebas that are floating around, sucking up energy. Those amoebas, they could be as big as Jupiter or they could be like a Volkswagen. Bottom line: WE ARE NOT ALONE

UAP Juan

49,806 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat