Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

I asked Creative Australia why Aboriginal orgnisations are receiving such an out-of-proportion share of arts funding. Their own annual report shows $32.1 million in First Nations investments out of a $285.8 million funding pool - over 10%, roughly three times the proportion of Aboriginal Australians. Promoting Aboriginal and Torres... show more

Malcolm Roberts 🇦🇺

168,001 subscribers

13,507 views • 10 days ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

I raised with Creative Australia the “rumoured” $800,000 grant to Sara M. Saleh. While the CEO, Mr. Collette, could not confirm this specific figure, he did clarify that artist Khaled Sabsabi, whose political views have been a point of contention, has received over $800,000 from the agency over the last 20 years, including his current representation of Australia at the Venice Biennale. I questioned why a commercial entity like APRA, with record revenues of $740 million, requires $4.3 million in taxpayer-funded grants. This raises the question: should public money subsidise the talent development of a profitable private firm? We must ask if these funds are supporting growth or simply replacing private capital. I also sought clarity on the accounting for Aboriginal arts programs. It was confirmed that approximately $32.1 million is dedicated to First Nations creative practice out of a total grant pool of $285 million. Several questions have been put on notice. I will wait for the exact figures on overseas spending, recent grants to Mr. Sabsabi, and the specific KPIs from their annual report to ensure that "investment" isn't just a buzzword for unchecked spending. My focus remains on ensuring that government funding serves the Australian public effectively and stays clear of political extremism.

I raised with Creative Australia the “rumoured” $800,000 grant to Sara M. Saleh. While the CEO, Mr. Collette, could not confirm this specific figure, he did clarify that artist Khaled Sabsabi, whose political views have been a point of contention, has received over $800,000 from the agency over the last 20 years, including his current representation of Australia at the Venice Biennale. I questioned why a commercial entity like APRA, with record revenues of $740 million, requires $4.3 million in taxpayer-funded grants. This raises the question: should public money subsidise the talent development of a profitable private firm? We must ask if these funds are supporting growth or simply replacing private capital. I also sought clarity on the accounting for Aboriginal arts programs. It was confirmed that approximately $32.1 million is dedicated to First Nations creative practice out of a total grant pool of $285 million. Several questions have been put on notice. I will wait for the exact figures on overseas spending, recent grants to Mr. Sabsabi, and the specific KPIs from their annual report to ensure that "investment" isn't just a buzzword for unchecked spending. My focus remains on ensuring that government funding serves the Australian public effectively and stays clear of political extremism.

Malcolm Roberts 🇦🇺

12,986 views • 3 months ago

Canadian Political Scientist Criticizes MMIWG2S+ Narrative on Violence Against Aboriginal Women Dr. Frances Widdowson attended the Red Dress event in Calgary, Alberta, organized by MMIWG2S+ advocates to honor missing and murdered Aboriginal women. “They are diagnosing the problem as one of racism and colonialism,” Dr. Widdowson, a long-time critic of the “Aboriginal industry,” said. She argued that due to this misdiagnosis, violence against Aboriginal women will continue, especially in rural areas. “Eighty-six percent, I believe, of Aboriginal women are murdered by Aboriginal men,” Dr. Widdowson said. Statistics Canada data shows that, in solved homicides between 2014 and 2021, 86% of persons accused of killing Indigenous women and girls were themselves Indigenous. Dr. Widdowson also argues that there is a higher level of prostitution among the Aboriginal female population. “Of course, prostitutes are very vulnerable people,” she said, adding that incarceration times for Aboriginal men are reduced due to Gladue principles. “So you’re releasing violent men back into Aboriginal communities, so all of these things contribute to higher murder rates of Aboriginal women.” Follow and support Media Bezirgan for more on-the-ground journalism.

Canadian Political Scientist Criticizes MMIWG2S+ Narrative on Violence Against Aboriginal Women Dr. Frances Widdowson attended the Red Dress event in Calgary, Alberta, organized by MMIWG2S+ advocates to honor missing and murdered Aboriginal women. “They are diagnosing the problem as one of racism and colonialism,” Dr. Widdowson, a long-time critic of the “Aboriginal industry,” said. She argued that due to this misdiagnosis, violence against Aboriginal women will continue, especially in rural areas. “Eighty-six percent, I believe, of Aboriginal women are murdered by Aboriginal men,” Dr. Widdowson said. Statistics Canada data shows that, in solved homicides between 2014 and 2021, 86% of persons accused of killing Indigenous women and girls were themselves Indigenous. Dr. Widdowson also argues that there is a higher level of prostitution among the Aboriginal female population. “Of course, prostitutes are very vulnerable people,” she said, adding that incarceration times for Aboriginal men are reduced due to Gladue principles. “So you’re releasing violent men back into Aboriginal communities, so all of these things contribute to higher murder rates of Aboriginal women.” Follow and support Media Bezirgan for more on-the-ground journalism.

Mocha Bezirgan 🇨🇦

26,795 views • 3 months ago

Jayapal: It is an increase in ICE funding. The reason people are saying it isn’t is because the CR from last year had an anomaly—a one-time funding amount of $485 million. If you add that into the base-year funding and look at this year, there is a $115 million decrease, but that was one-time anomaly funding. The core issue here is that there really are no guardrails on ICE and CBP. I can’t vote for it. I can’t be complicit in continuing to allow them to violate the constitutional rights of people across this country.

Jayapal: It is an increase in ICE funding. The reason people are saying it isn’t is because the CR from last year had an anomaly—a one-time funding amount of $485 million. If you add that into the base-year funding and look at this year, there is a $115 million decrease, but that was one-time anomaly funding. The core issue here is that there really are no guardrails on ICE and CBP. I can’t vote for it. I can’t be complicit in continuing to allow them to violate the constitutional rights of people across this country.

Acyn

155,341 views • 6 months ago

$Australia’s Future at Risk: Global Creeping Coup Embedded in the Aboriginal Treaty Process A silent, creeping coup is underway. More than 1,000 international treaties have been signed—without the informed consent of the Australian people. Among them is the Sendai Framework, which places Australia’s health policy under the control of foreign actors, as seen in the coordinated COVID lockstep response. These agreements are reshaping our governance—quietly, methodically—placing control in the hands of foreign agents and agendas. Our elected representatives have no say. We have no say. Laws are being dictated externally through a tangle of treaties, policies, and directives designed to entangle us in a global web of control—one that strips Australia of its sovereignty and people of their voice. The manipulation is legal, but not legitimate. This web of control is anchored in Agenda 21, a 300-page plan of comprehensive governance—since rebranded as Agenda 2030. Despite its sweeping implications, Parliament has embedded it into law without proper scrutiny or public mandate. Our Parliament is captured/compromised. Agenda 21 is not just theory—it’s a blueprint to control everything: land, health, environment, resources, and Indigenous affairs. Under the guise of an Aboriginal treaty process, land is being transferred—not to Aboriginal ownership or autonomy—but into communal titles inaccessible to Aboriginal Australians—under the native title con. Which is designed to end private property rights for everyday Australians. It won’t begin with your home—it starts with Crown land. They are not just targeting property. They are targeting custodianship. This is not reconciliation—it’s reallocation, and it’s happening under frameworks like the Aboriginal treaty, disguised as benevolent policy. This is the point of the treaty: it is part of a recolonisation process. As seen—not just in Australia—landmarks are being renamed. Ayers Rock to Uluru, for example. Renaming and restricting access to these places—where people once holidayed freely—is generating social tension. Now, you can’t set foot on them, and it’s framed as being because “the Aboriginal people don’t want you to.” But that is a lie. The true agenda is being hidden in plain sight. Aboriginal people are being used as scapegoats— under the guise of a global Indigenous rights movement. Behind the language of empowerment lies a strategy of exploitation. By using Aboriginal people as the public face of this agenda, resentment is being weaponised. Emotional friction isn’t incidental—it’s deliberately manufactured and inflamed. This isn’t accidental. Operatives have been strategically embedded to infiltrate and neutralise resistance from within, seeding chaos and confusion at every level. A Secret Society of Central Bankers created Aboriginal Affairs to Scapegoat for Land Grabs But pause and ask yourself: how could this be an Aboriginal-led movement when the very architects who established central banking—both globally and in Australia—are behind the Native Title con and the treaty framework? These figures are linked to a Freemasonic network of financial elites, operating through secret societies tied to the leadership of the Bank of England. The Aboriginal treaty agenda was manufactured through international interference—serving neither Aboriginal communities nor the broader Australian public. It is not reconciliation. It is systemic manipulation—an insidious operation cloaked in the language of justice, built on a web of lies designed to control everything. A Long History of Undermining Nations This is not a new tactic. The same forces have long used policy, economic pressure, and manufactured tensions to erode national autonomy—undermining governments from within while presenting international frameworks as benevolent solutions. Behind the façade lies strategic intervention: targeted disruption masquerading as global progress. This pattern is evident in the origins of Aboriginal Affairs in Australia. Those responsible were also complicit in financing the Nazi regime—before war had been declared. Their covert transfer of stolen foreign gold revitalised a defeated Germany, fuelling the rise of a vast military-industrial complex and enabling the blitzkrieg campaign. These same actors inserted operatives into Bolshevik Russia. They carry a well-documented legacy of dismantling sovereign nations from within. And once again, they stand as the architects of Aboriginal Affairs in Australia. And it’s not just Australia. This is part of a global agenda. In Canada, over 40,000 sites are being renamed. The United States and New Zealand are following the same trajectory. It is a coordinated strategy—engineered to fracture unity and provoke division, all under the guise of reconciliation. Indigenous peoples are being used as scapegoats in a broader agenda to claim control over land, identity, and governance. Even the "Welcome to Country" phoney performance—seen across these nations—function as psychological operations. What appears to be inclusion is the bait in a broader trap. Fight together, not each other. READ THE FULL ARTICLE HERE:$

Australia’s Future at Risk: Global Creeping Coup Embedded in the Aboriginal Treaty Process A silent, creeping coup is underway. More than 1,000 international treaties have been signed—without the informed consent of the Australian people. Among them is the Sendai Framework, which places Australia’s health policy under the control of foreign actors, as seen in the coordinated COVID lockstep response. These agreements are reshaping our governance—quietly, methodically—placing control in the hands of foreign agents and agendas. Our elected representatives have no say. We have no say. Laws are being dictated externally through a tangle of treaties, policies, and directives designed to entangle us in a global web of control—one that strips Australia of its sovereignty and people of their voice. The manipulation is legal, but not legitimate. This web of control is anchored in Agenda 21, a 300-page plan of comprehensive governance—since rebranded as Agenda 2030. Despite its sweeping implications, Parliament has embedded it into law without proper scrutiny or public mandate. Our Parliament is captured/compromised. Agenda 21 is not just theory—it’s a blueprint to control everything: land, health, environment, resources, and Indigenous affairs. Under the guise of an Aboriginal treaty process, land is being transferred—not to Aboriginal ownership or autonomy—but into communal titles inaccessible to Aboriginal Australians—under the native title con. Which is designed to end private property rights for everyday Australians. It won’t begin with your home—it starts with Crown land. They are not just targeting property. They are targeting custodianship. This is not reconciliation—it’s reallocation, and it’s happening under frameworks like the Aboriginal treaty, disguised as benevolent policy. This is the point of the treaty: it is part of a recolonisation process. As seen—not just in Australia—landmarks are being renamed. Ayers Rock to Uluru, for example. Renaming and restricting access to these places—where people once holidayed freely—is generating social tension. Now, you can’t set foot on them, and it’s framed as being because “the Aboriginal people don’t want you to.” But that is a lie. The true agenda is being hidden in plain sight. Aboriginal people are being used as scapegoats— under the guise of a global Indigenous rights movement. Behind the language of empowerment lies a strategy of exploitation. By using Aboriginal people as the public face of this agenda, resentment is being weaponised. Emotional friction isn’t incidental—it’s deliberately manufactured and inflamed. This isn’t accidental. Operatives have been strategically embedded to infiltrate and neutralise resistance from within, seeding chaos and confusion at every level. A Secret Society of Central Bankers created Aboriginal Affairs to Scapegoat for Land Grabs But pause and ask yourself: how could this be an Aboriginal-led movement when the very architects who established central banking—both globally and in Australia—are behind the Native Title con and the treaty framework? These figures are linked to a Freemasonic network of financial elites, operating through secret societies tied to the leadership of the Bank of England. The Aboriginal treaty agenda was manufactured through international interference—serving neither Aboriginal communities nor the broader Australian public. It is not reconciliation. It is systemic manipulation—an insidious operation cloaked in the language of justice, built on a web of lies designed to control everything. A Long History of Undermining Nations This is not a new tactic. The same forces have long used policy, economic pressure, and manufactured tensions to erode national autonomy—undermining governments from within while presenting international frameworks as benevolent solutions. Behind the façade lies strategic intervention: targeted disruption masquerading as global progress. This pattern is evident in the origins of Aboriginal Affairs in Australia. Those responsible were also complicit in financing the Nazi regime—before war had been declared. Their covert transfer of stolen foreign gold revitalised a defeated Germany, fuelling the rise of a vast military-industrial complex and enabling the blitzkrieg campaign. These same actors inserted operatives into Bolshevik Russia. They carry a well-documented legacy of dismantling sovereign nations from within. And once again, they stand as the architects of Aboriginal Affairs in Australia. And it’s not just Australia. This is part of a global agenda. In Canada, over 40,000 sites are being renamed. The United States and New Zealand are following the same trajectory. It is a coordinated strategy—engineered to fracture unity and provoke division, all under the guise of reconciliation. Indigenous peoples are being used as scapegoats in a broader agenda to claim control over land, identity, and governance. Even the "Welcome to Country" phoney performance—seen across these nations—function as psychological operations. What appears to be inclusion is the bait in a broader trap. Fight together, not each other. READ THE FULL ARTICLE HERE:

Josephine Cashman

60,555 views • 1 year ago

Uncovering Aboriginal Australia: A Conversation with Mungo Manic Detailed timestamps 👇 Origins and Early Human Migration 00:00 Introduction to Mungo Manic and early Australians 00:55 Who is Mungo Manic 03:41 Terminology and definitions of "Aboriginal" 04:47 Terminology preferences in scientific contexts 05:29 Origins of the word "Aboriginal" and its historical usage 07:32 The term "Aboriginal" losing a genetic or racial definition in the 1960s or 1970s 09:10 The three-part test of Aboriginal identity Early Human Settlement and Fossil Evidence 12:55 How and when humans first arrived in Australia 16:40 Early skeletons, including Mungo Man 21:00 The study of Mungo Man 23:35 Did Denisovans make it to Australia 25:20 Fossil degradation in Lake Mungo Isolation, Cultural Practices, and Environmental Adaptation 26:00 Isolation of pre-colonial Australia and the ancestry of dingoes 33:15 Aboriginal women breastfeeding dingoes and their importance as pets 36:35 The taboo against eating dog in Parsi culture Social Structures and Survival Practices 37:30 Infanticide in Aboriginal Australian culture 40:55 Cannibalism in Aboriginal Australian culture including endocannibalism and exocannibalism 42:14 Warfare and violence in early Australian life 42:48 The nature of warfare and violence in ancient Australian societies 44:20 Christophe Darmangeat's expertise on Aboriginal warfare 45:39 Capital and corporal punishment in Aboriginal Australia 49:28 The lack of rights for Aboriginal women 51:30 Sorcery and the practice of pointing the bone Technology, Environment, and Innovation 54:00 Technological development in Aboriginal Australia and Jared Diamond’s theory 56:23 Was Australia actually a harsh environment 58:43 Technological simplicity in Tasmania after separation from mainland Australia 01:02:00 Competition and innovation 01:03:45 Kimberley spear points, Sulawesi, and Macassan sailors 01:05:30 The oldest known rock art Cultural Practices and Initiation Rituals 01:06:45 Cultural practices and initiation rituals 01:07:30 Initiation practices including scarification, tooth evulsion, and circumcision 01:12:20 Subincision 01:14:00 Female circumcision and virginity in Aboriginal Australia 01:20:00 The Fatal Shore by Robert Hughes, wife-sharing, and sexual practices in Aboriginal culture 01:24:46 The practice of clubbing women 01:25:35 The resilience and immune system of Aboriginal Australians Impact of Humans on the Environment 01:27:08 Human impact on the Australian landscape and megafauna extinction 01:31:00 Boomerangs used in warfare 01:33:50 The film Ten Canoes Religious and Spiritual Beliefs 01:35:20 Religious beliefs and spiritual practices including the Dreaming 01:40:00 Aboriginal eschatology 01:42:00 The extinction of the people of Kangaroo Island 01:43:00 Mourning periods and mummification 01:45:42 The cultural practice of not mentioning the dead Modern Aboriginal Identity and Historical Debates 01:48:04 Are Tasmanian Aboriginals extinct Was it genocide The Henry Reynolds black armband theory vs Keith Windschuttle 01:53:53 Defining Aboriginal identity today racial definitions vs self-identification 01:56:55 Blue-eyed blonde-haired Aboriginal people vs Tasmanian Aboriginals 02:00:52 The importance of Tasmanian DNA research 02:03:22 A critique of Bruce Pascoe’s Dark Emu and its depiction of ancient Australians as agriculturalists Colonial Impact and Unanswered Questions 02:11:27 Kidnappings 02:15:40 The need for anonymity in controversial discussions 02:29:27 Biggest mysteries in Aboriginal history

Uncovering Aboriginal Australia: A Conversation with Mungo Manic Detailed timestamps 👇 Origins and Early Human Migration 00:00 Introduction to Mungo Manic and early Australians 00:55 Who is Mungo Manic 03:41 Terminology and definitions of "Aboriginal" 04:47 Terminology preferences in scientific contexts 05:29 Origins of the word "Aboriginal" and its historical usage 07:32 The term "Aboriginal" losing a genetic or racial definition in the 1960s or 1970s 09:10 The three-part test of Aboriginal identity Early Human Settlement and Fossil Evidence 12:55 How and when humans first arrived in Australia 16:40 Early skeletons, including Mungo Man 21:00 The study of Mungo Man 23:35 Did Denisovans make it to Australia 25:20 Fossil degradation in Lake Mungo Isolation, Cultural Practices, and Environmental Adaptation 26:00 Isolation of pre-colonial Australia and the ancestry of dingoes 33:15 Aboriginal women breastfeeding dingoes and their importance as pets 36:35 The taboo against eating dog in Parsi culture Social Structures and Survival Practices 37:30 Infanticide in Aboriginal Australian culture 40:55 Cannibalism in Aboriginal Australian culture including endocannibalism and exocannibalism 42:14 Warfare and violence in early Australian life 42:48 The nature of warfare and violence in ancient Australian societies 44:20 Christophe Darmangeat's expertise on Aboriginal warfare 45:39 Capital and corporal punishment in Aboriginal Australia 49:28 The lack of rights for Aboriginal women 51:30 Sorcery and the practice of pointing the bone Technology, Environment, and Innovation 54:00 Technological development in Aboriginal Australia and Jared Diamond’s theory 56:23 Was Australia actually a harsh environment 58:43 Technological simplicity in Tasmania after separation from mainland Australia 01:02:00 Competition and innovation 01:03:45 Kimberley spear points, Sulawesi, and Macassan sailors 01:05:30 The oldest known rock art Cultural Practices and Initiation Rituals 01:06:45 Cultural practices and initiation rituals 01:07:30 Initiation practices including scarification, tooth evulsion, and circumcision 01:12:20 Subincision 01:14:00 Female circumcision and virginity in Aboriginal Australia 01:20:00 The Fatal Shore by Robert Hughes, wife-sharing, and sexual practices in Aboriginal culture 01:24:46 The practice of clubbing women 01:25:35 The resilience and immune system of Aboriginal Australians Impact of Humans on the Environment 01:27:08 Human impact on the Australian landscape and megafauna extinction 01:31:00 Boomerangs used in warfare 01:33:50 The film Ten Canoes Religious and Spiritual Beliefs 01:35:20 Religious beliefs and spiritual practices including the Dreaming 01:40:00 Aboriginal eschatology 01:42:00 The extinction of the people of Kangaroo Island 01:43:00 Mourning periods and mummification 01:45:42 The cultural practice of not mentioning the dead Modern Aboriginal Identity and Historical Debates 01:48:04 Are Tasmanian Aboriginals extinct Was it genocide The Henry Reynolds black armband theory vs Keith Windschuttle 01:53:53 Defining Aboriginal identity today racial definitions vs self-identification 01:56:55 Blue-eyed blonde-haired Aboriginal people vs Tasmanian Aboriginals 02:00:52 The importance of Tasmanian DNA research 02:03:22 A critique of Bruce Pascoe’s Dark Emu and its depiction of ancient Australians as agriculturalists Colonial Impact and Unanswered Questions 02:11:27 Kidnappings 02:15:40 The need for anonymity in controversial discussions 02:29:27 Biggest mysteries in Aboriginal history

Quillette

83,061 views • 1 year ago

This CR is turning into a three-month omnibus, that will result in more Democrats than Republicans voting for it. The Swamp is using farmers and victims of natural disasters as pawns to fund an over-bloated pet project filled disaster. I would much rather help farmers and victims of natural disasters than continue a budget I already voted against, funding foreign governments and foreign wars. Why are farmers and victims of natural disasters always political pawns in an effort to continue funding bloated government? But it’s the same old Uniparty BS, dangling important programs around as bargaining chip to fuel more government waste and adding to our deficit.

This CR is turning into a three-month omnibus, that will result in more Democrats than Republicans voting for it. The Swamp is using farmers and victims of natural disasters as pawns to fund an over-bloated pet project filled disaster. I would much rather help farmers and victims of natural disasters than continue a budget I already voted against, funding foreign governments and foreign wars. Why are farmers and victims of natural disasters always political pawns in an effort to continue funding bloated government? But it’s the same old Uniparty BS, dangling important programs around as bargaining chip to fuel more government waste and adding to our deficit.

Former Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

961,066 views • 1 year ago

The Hon’ble PM keeps repeating that the Centre gave “more money” to Tamil Nadu during 2014–25 than in 2004–14, even claiming 7× higher railway funding 🚆💰 But honestly, even a first-year economics student knows this argument doesn’t hold 📚👇 📈 GDP today is far larger than it was a decade ago 📊 Union Budgets expand every single year 💸 Total government expenditure always rises So of course the absolute numbers will look bigger. That’s basic math, not generosity. The real question is 👇 🔍 Is Tamil Nadu getting a higher share of GDP? 🔍 Is TN’s share of total Union expenditure increasing? 🔍 Is funding growing in proportion, not just on paper? If the answer is NO, then these loud claims are just statistical illusions, not economic justice 🚨 📉 Bigger numbers don’t mean fair treatment. 📢 Proportion matters. Share matters. Truth matters. Stop selling inflation-adjusted optics as development 🙅‍♂️📉 Tamil Nadu deserves facts, not propaganda ✊🏽📊 #NDABetraysTN

The Hon’ble PM keeps repeating that the Centre gave “more money” to Tamil Nadu during 2014–25 than in 2004–14, even claiming 7× higher railway funding 🚆💰 But honestly, even a first-year economics student knows this argument doesn’t hold 📚👇 📈 GDP today is far larger than it was a decade ago 📊 Union Budgets expand every single year 💸 Total government expenditure always rises So of course the absolute numbers will look bigger. That’s basic math, not generosity. The real question is 👇 🔍 Is Tamil Nadu getting a higher share of GDP? 🔍 Is TN’s share of total Union expenditure increasing? 🔍 Is funding growing in proportion, not just on paper? If the answer is NO, then these loud claims are just statistical illusions, not economic justice 🚨 📉 Bigger numbers don’t mean fair treatment. 📢 Proportion matters. Share matters. Truth matters. Stop selling inflation-adjusted optics as development 🙅‍♂️📉 Tamil Nadu deserves facts, not propaganda ✊🏽📊 #NDABetraysTN

DMK IT WING

11,947 views • 6 months ago

The 4.5 billion dollar-per-year National Indigenous Australians Agency has been quick to deny it’s been developing demands to be made by the voice to Parliament, revealed in a letter sent to my office last week. I’ll remind you what some of these demands were: •Aborigines paying only 50 per cent the rate of income tax; •Aboriginal groups owning beaches and national parks, and charging the rest of us to use them; •10 per cent of all judges, magistrates, police officers, ADF officers, vice chancellors and ambassadors to be Aboriginal; •no entry tests and no fees for Aborigines going to university; •50 per cent discounts for Aborigines going to sport and music events on public land; •Aborigines to have first claim on all public housing in Australia; •reduced age of eligibility for the aged pension for Aborigines; •rivers and streams to be owned by local Aborigines, who will charge the rest of us for water consumption; •the same for mining royalties; •all new liquor licences to be vetted by the voice; and •the voice office being the same size, and having the same budget, as the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet. As I said, the NIAA has been quick to deny this ‘action list’ for the voice, and no wonder! If any these demands were met, 97 per cent of Australians would be made second-class citizens based solely on race. However, minutes of government organisations meetings with Aboriginal groups around the country obtained through a freedom of information request show these sort of demands are being discussed. These include: •exclusive sovereignty for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people over land and waters; •creating a new Aboriginal state from land under native title, with its own constitution; •a treaty or treaties recognised in the Australian Constitution; •racially-exclusive designated seats in Parliament reserved only for Aborigines; •Aborigines to receive a fixed percentage of all Australian gross national product; •Aborigines to be exempted from paying land tax; •funding for the voice to Parliament to be generated from percentages of land and water taxes; •funding for Aboriginal bodies and programs to be linked to reparations for “theft of land”; •creation of a ‘black Parliament’; •a race-based rent tax from “an open cheque book”; •race-based “inherent” rights for Aboriginal people in the Australian Constitution; •renaming more towns and landmarks after Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people; •the creation of “sovereign wealth” exclusively for Aborigines; •Australian taxpayers to fund the preservation of Aboriginal languages; •changing the Australian flag because it “symbolises the injustices of colonisation”; •tearing down statues of explorers; •enshrining Aboriginal “traditional ways of life” in the Constitution; •changing the curriculum in all schools for non-indigenous Australians; •“de-colonising” Australia; and •fee-free access for Aborigines to sport and recreation, including free sporting equipment. Like the demands contained in the letter sent to me, many of these would also make most Australians second-class citizens in our own country. The 4.5 billion dollar NIAA has been actively discussing them with Aboriginal groups for years. These are the dangers of putting the voice to Parliament in the Constitution. For these and many other reasons, it’s why Australians must vote NO in Anthony Albanese’s racist referendum.

The 4.5 billion dollar-per-year National Indigenous Australians Agency has been quick to deny it’s been developing demands to be made by the voice to Parliament, revealed in a letter sent to my office last week. I’ll remind you what some of these demands were: •Aborigines paying only 50 per cent the rate of income tax; •Aboriginal groups owning beaches and national parks, and charging the rest of us to use them; •10 per cent of all judges, magistrates, police officers, ADF officers, vice chancellors and ambassadors to be Aboriginal; •no entry tests and no fees for Aborigines going to university; •50 per cent discounts for Aborigines going to sport and music events on public land; •Aborigines to have first claim on all public housing in Australia; •reduced age of eligibility for the aged pension for Aborigines; •rivers and streams to be owned by local Aborigines, who will charge the rest of us for water consumption; •the same for mining royalties; •all new liquor licences to be vetted by the voice; and •the voice office being the same size, and having the same budget, as the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet. As I said, the NIAA has been quick to deny this ‘action list’ for the voice, and no wonder! If any these demands were met, 97 per cent of Australians would be made second-class citizens based solely on race. However, minutes of government organisations meetings with Aboriginal groups around the country obtained through a freedom of information request show these sort of demands are being discussed. These include: •exclusive sovereignty for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people over land and waters; •creating a new Aboriginal state from land under native title, with its own constitution; •a treaty or treaties recognised in the Australian Constitution; •racially-exclusive designated seats in Parliament reserved only for Aborigines; •Aborigines to receive a fixed percentage of all Australian gross national product; •Aborigines to be exempted from paying land tax; •funding for the voice to Parliament to be generated from percentages of land and water taxes; •funding for Aboriginal bodies and programs to be linked to reparations for “theft of land”; •creation of a ‘black Parliament’; •a race-based rent tax from “an open cheque book”; •race-based “inherent” rights for Aboriginal people in the Australian Constitution; •renaming more towns and landmarks after Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people; •the creation of “sovereign wealth” exclusively for Aborigines; •Australian taxpayers to fund the preservation of Aboriginal languages; •changing the Australian flag because it “symbolises the injustices of colonisation”; •tearing down statues of explorers; •enshrining Aboriginal “traditional ways of life” in the Constitution; •changing the curriculum in all schools for non-indigenous Australians; •“de-colonising” Australia; and •fee-free access for Aborigines to sport and recreation, including free sporting equipment. Like the demands contained in the letter sent to me, many of these would also make most Australians second-class citizens in our own country. The 4.5 billion dollar NIAA has been actively discussing them with Aboriginal groups for years. These are the dangers of putting the voice to Parliament in the Constitution. For these and many other reasons, it’s why Australians must vote NO in Anthony Albanese’s racist referendum.

Pauline Hanson 🇦🇺

288,210 views • 3 years ago

The secretive transfer of land by the government to Aboriginal corporations has gotten completely out of hand, putting the rights of everyday Australians at risk. Large areas of Crown land in Queensland have been handed over to Aboriginal groups without proper consultation with local communities. People are rightly furious. But this isn't just about land—it's about protecting our sovereignty and ensuring everyone enjoys equal rights in this country. Both Labor and the Coalition have failed Australians by pushing these deals through in secret, keeping locals in the dark. One Nation is the only party prepared to stand up and call for an end to these divisive land transfers. We are committed to stopping the division of our nation and making sure every Australian, no matter their background, has a fair go. Support One Nation Australia:

The secretive transfer of land by the government to Aboriginal corporations has gotten completely out of hand, putting the rights of everyday Australians at risk. Large areas of Crown land in Queensland have been handed over to Aboriginal groups without proper consultation with local communities. People are rightly furious. But this isn't just about land—it's about protecting our sovereignty and ensuring everyone enjoys equal rights in this country. Both Labor and the Coalition have failed Australians by pushing these deals through in secret, keeping locals in the dark. One Nation is the only party prepared to stand up and call for an end to these divisive land transfers. We are committed to stopping the division of our nation and making sure every Australian, no matter their background, has a fair go. Support One Nation Australia:

Pauline Hanson 🇦🇺

112,009 views • 1 year ago

Only 8 million people pay for the entire United Kingdom. The UK has 70 million people. 40 million pay no tax at all. Of the 30 million who do, only 8 million pay more into the system than they take out. They are funding a government that keeps importing more people who take more out than they put in. This is pure economic and civilizational suicide of the UK.

Only 8 million people pay for the entire United Kingdom. The UK has 70 million people. 40 million pay no tax at all. Of the 30 million who do, only 8 million pay more into the system than they take out. They are funding a government that keeps importing more people who take more out than they put in. This is pure economic and civilizational suicide of the UK.

Mees Wynants

502,700 views • 1 month ago

🔥WOWWW.. "DO YOU KNOW ANY OF THE NAMES OF THESE FUNDERS? IF SO I WANT YOU TO GIVE THEM TO GIVE THEM TO KASH & PAM..THESE ARE TREASONISTS PROBABLY..VERY IMPORTANT." - President Trump One thing is clear..ANTIFA IS ABOUT TO BE COMPLETELY DISMANTLED. THE PROTEST INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX IS NOT JUST SOROS BUT RIOT INC. & WE FOUND A NETWORK OF FUNDING NETWORKS OF FUNDER MANY OF WHICH ARE NOT CITIZENS OF THIS COUNTRY. " IT HAS THESE INVESTORS WE HAVE MENTIONED..WE HAVE IDENTIFIED DOZENS OF RADICAL ORGANIZATIONS ....NOT JUST THE DECENTRALIZED ANTIFA ORGS..BUT DOZENS THAT HAVE RECEIVED MORE THAN 100 MILLION DOLLARS FROM THE RIOT INC. INVESTORS.. THESE WOULD BE THE LAWYERS GROUPS WHO ADVOCATE CALLING AMERICANS FASCIST..AND THE MOST SHOCKING THING IS THAT WE HAVE FOUND THAT MORE THAN 100 MILLION IN U.S. TAX PAYER FUNDING HAS FLOWED INTO THESE FUNDING NETWORKS."

🔥WOWWW.. "DO YOU KNOW ANY OF THE NAMES OF THESE FUNDERS? IF SO I WANT YOU TO GIVE THEM TO GIVE THEM TO KASH & PAM..THESE ARE TREASONISTS PROBABLY..VERY IMPORTANT." - President Trump One thing is clear..ANTIFA IS ABOUT TO BE COMPLETELY DISMANTLED. THE PROTEST INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX IS NOT JUST SOROS BUT RIOT INC. & WE FOUND A NETWORK OF FUNDING NETWORKS OF FUNDER MANY OF WHICH ARE NOT CITIZENS OF THIS COUNTRY. " IT HAS THESE INVESTORS WE HAVE MENTIONED..WE HAVE IDENTIFIED DOZENS OF RADICAL ORGANIZATIONS ....NOT JUST THE DECENTRALIZED ANTIFA ORGS..BUT DOZENS THAT HAVE RECEIVED MORE THAN 100 MILLION DOLLARS FROM THE RIOT INC. INVESTORS.. THESE WOULD BE THE LAWYERS GROUPS WHO ADVOCATE CALLING AMERICANS FASCIST..AND THE MOST SHOCKING THING IS THAT WE HAVE FOUND THAT MORE THAN 100 MILLION IN U.S. TAX PAYER FUNDING HAS FLOWED INTO THESE FUNDING NETWORKS."

Johnny St.Pete

23,654 views • 10 months ago

Dr. Mike Israetel on the three futures of money after AGI and the one he's betting his health on: "I'm working fairly hard now to try to accumulate as much wealth as humanly possible at the expense of every other facet of my life." "I just don't know if the future is going to go into one of three directions. One is money on the margins matters substantially less, which there are convincing ideas about." "The other one is it matters roughly the same as it does now, which is a lot, but it's not everything." "The other way is money matters actually considerably more, because the top end of expensive new sh*t you can buy is so esoterically awesome that if I only had a million dollars, I could upgrade my DNA. But that won't be available to everyone else for 50 bucks for another two years" "My current logic is just shut up and make as much money as possible. And if it turns out in 2029 money doesn't matter anymore, whatever. Okay, sweet." Dr. Mike Israetel

Dr. Mike Israetel on the three futures of money after AGI and the one he's betting his health on: "I'm working fairly hard now to try to accumulate as much wealth as humanly possible at the expense of every other facet of my life." "I just don't know if the future is going to go into one of three directions. One is money on the margins matters substantially less, which there are convincing ideas about." "The other one is it matters roughly the same as it does now, which is a lot, but it's not everything." "The other way is money matters actually considerably more, because the top end of expensive new sh*t you can buy is so esoterically awesome that if I only had a million dollars, I could upgrade my DNA. But that won't be available to everyone else for 50 bucks for another two years" "My current logic is just shut up and make as much money as possible. And if it turns out in 2029 money doesn't matter anymore, whatever. Okay, sweet." Dr. Mike Israetel

MTS

14,232 views • 1 month ago

"The EF is completely out of touch. They're funding hippos in Asia and doing a bunch of stuff nobody in the world gives a shit about other than Vitalik and his little cabal" Zak on why the EF can no longer take the same liberties it did six years ago "They tried it out with Tomasz and kind of shit the bed. Now they're just like let's go back to what we know, which is infinite gardening and funding longevity research" "At least they're acknowledging that other organizations are gonna have to step in. But then it becomes a question of whether they're actually going to seed those reins to any organization that is more competent and more in touch" "Ethereum is no longer a startup. It's a mature and robust ecosystem. There's billions, trillions of dollars on the line. Livelihoods are dependent on that. My entire career has been on Ethereum. If it goes to shit, what am I gonna do?"

"The EF is completely out of touch. They're funding hippos in Asia and doing a bunch of stuff nobody in the world gives a shit about other than Vitalik and his little cabal" Zak on why the EF can no longer take the same liberties it did six years ago "They tried it out with Tomasz and kind of shit the bed. Now they're just like let's go back to what we know, which is infinite gardening and funding longevity research" "At least they're acknowledging that other organizations are gonna have to step in. But then it becomes a question of whether they're actually going to seed those reins to any organization that is more competent and more in touch" "Ethereum is no longer a startup. It's a mature and robust ecosystem. There's billions, trillions of dollars on the line. Livelihoods are dependent on that. My entire career has been on Ethereum. If it goes to shit, what am I gonna do?"

Laura Shin

58,554 views • 2 months ago

Why are there so few Muslim billionaires? Muslims make up 24% of the world population and 6% of billionaires. That's a quarter of the proportion it would be if there was a representative population. Muslims are the poorest demographic (by religion) in the UK. They are most likely to be subject to racism. Islamophobia is almost a state religion. There are, by contrast more than 50 times the number of Jewish billionaires in relation to their population in the world (0.2% of the population and 10% of the billionaires).

Why are there so few Muslim billionaires? Muslims make up 24% of the world population and 6% of billionaires. That's a quarter of the proportion it would be if there was a representative population. Muslims are the poorest demographic (by religion) in the UK. They are most likely to be subject to racism. Islamophobia is almost a state religion. There are, by contrast more than 50 times the number of Jewish billionaires in relation to their population in the world (0.2% of the population and 10% of the billionaires).

David Miller

17,013 views • 2 months ago

This is a genuinely STUNNING speech from the Western Australian Parliament. Indian born elected representative Parwinder Kaur appears to claim that Indian people are Indigenous to Australia: “Our genes are integrated into the very first peoples of this nation.” A trained geneticist, she points to supposed ancient migration flows from India some 4000 years ago: “Some Aboriginal Australians carry 11% ancient Indian DNA.” By implication she appears to be saying that Indian Australians are more Australian than European Australians, and therefore have more of a right to live in Australia and determine the migration policy settings of Australia. I don’t think she realises how much damage she is doing to the social fabric of this country by making claims like this. This is just a genuinely catastrophic speech for inter communal harmony. She only moved to Australia in 2007 as an international student but she is basically claiming to be more Australian than people with ten generations of history dating back to the First Fleet.

This is a genuinely STUNNING speech from the Western Australian Parliament. Indian born elected representative Parwinder Kaur appears to claim that Indian people are Indigenous to Australia: “Our genes are integrated into the very first peoples of this nation.” A trained geneticist, she points to supposed ancient migration flows from India some 4000 years ago: “Some Aboriginal Australians carry 11% ancient Indian DNA.” By implication she appears to be saying that Indian Australians are more Australian than European Australians, and therefore have more of a right to live in Australia and determine the migration policy settings of Australia. I don’t think she realises how much damage she is doing to the social fabric of this country by making claims like this. This is just a genuinely catastrophic speech for inter communal harmony. She only moved to Australia in 2007 as an international student but she is basically claiming to be more Australian than people with ten generations of history dating back to the First Fleet.

Drew Pavlou 🇦🇺🇺🇸🇺🇦🇹🇼

102,449 views • 11 months ago

“I believe in that time-tested tradition of making records that live and breathe as one piece of art. An album is the ultimate creative expression, and the way we consume art now just takes the edges off that creativity. It’s built to confine it, to choke it out. With this record, it’s really my way of fighting for the creative spirit, that spirit of ‘Evangeline.’ Because I know that where we are in the world, it probably shouldn’t exist. But it does. It can live here. It can run free here. And, the best music has to fight the hardest to get out.” Evangeline vs. The Machine is OUT NOW. Listen to the new album:

“I believe in that time-tested tradition of making records that live and breathe as one piece of art. An album is the ultimate creative expression, and the way we consume art now just takes the edges off that creativity. It’s built to confine it, to choke it out. With this record, it’s really my way of fighting for the creative spirit, that spirit of ‘Evangeline.’ Because I know that where we are in the world, it probably shouldn’t exist. But it does. It can live here. It can run free here. And, the best music has to fight the hardest to get out.” Evangeline vs. The Machine is OUT NOW. Listen to the new album:

Eric Church

160,901 views • 1 year ago

The UK’s welfare bill is lower than it was 15 years ago as a proportion of national income. But mainstream media keep pushing the idea that it needs to be slashed so we can spend more on “defence”. When economist Jonathan Portes was asked on Sky News where the welfare bill could be cut – he called out the broadcaster for asking a "nonsense" question. The idea that welfare spending is out of control “is just wrong," he said.

The UK’s welfare bill is lower than it was 15 years ago as a proportion of national income. But mainstream media keep pushing the idea that it needs to be slashed so we can spend more on “defence”. When economist Jonathan Portes was asked on Sky News where the welfare bill could be cut – he called out the broadcaster for asking a "nonsense" question. The idea that welfare spending is out of control “is just wrong," he said.

Novara Media

77,442 views • 1 month ago

Lisa Jane Spencer made fun of Indians, Jews, and virtually every group in Australia, but was cancelled for making a joke about White people pretending to be Aboriginal. This is Aboriginality on full display: a system of weaponised guilt that has enabled the left and migrants to steal Australia. It is a highly sanctified doctrine designed to paralyse Australians with historical guilt. Under this system, Australia is forever "stolen land" and Whites are permanent "colonisers" with no moral right to control their own borders or destiny. Even jokes like Lisa's, which only brush against the fringes of this belief system, are defended aggressively by the left (and even some conservatives, due to its lifelong dominance), more fiercely than jokes about any other ethnicity, because without it the core base of the left's power collapses.

Lisa Jane Spencer made fun of Indians, Jews, and virtually every group in Australia, but was cancelled for making a joke about White people pretending to be Aboriginal. This is Aboriginality on full display: a system of weaponised guilt that has enabled the left and migrants to steal Australia. It is a highly sanctified doctrine designed to paralyse Australians with historical guilt. Under this system, Australia is forever "stolen land" and Whites are permanent "colonisers" with no moral right to control their own borders or destiny. Even jokes like Lisa's, which only brush against the fringes of this belief system, are defended aggressively by the left (and even some conservatives, due to its lifelong dominance), more fiercely than jokes about any other ethnicity, because without it the core base of the left's power collapses.

auspill

70,738 views • 2 months ago

🚨 REPORTER: "I'm curious, how would you, winning the Nobel Peace Prize, improve the lives of average everyday Americans? Why is this prize so important?" PRESIDENT TRUMP: "It wouldn't improve the lives..." "...what improved the lives of people are people that are living. I saved probably tens of millions of lives in the wars." "You know, if you add up the numbers, just if you look at any one of those wars, you're talking about millions of people. You multiply it times eight." "But when you look at India and Pakistan, that could have been 10, 15, 20 million people. Could have been more than that. So I saved millions of people. So that, to me, is the big thing."

🚨 REPORTER: "I'm curious, how would you, winning the Nobel Peace Prize, improve the lives of average everyday Americans? Why is this prize so important?" PRESIDENT TRUMP: "It wouldn't improve the lives..." "...what improved the lives of people are people that are living. I saved probably tens of millions of lives in the wars." "You know, if you add up the numbers, just if you look at any one of those wars, you're talking about millions of people. You multiply it times eight." "But when you look at India and Pakistan, that could have been 10, 15, 20 million people. Could have been more than that. So I saved millions of people. So that, to me, is the big thing."

Eric Daugherty

35,601 views • 6 months ago

$Last year, an Aboriginal ‘welcome to country’ at an ANZAC Day dawn service was booed. This year, there are calls to ensure the booing won’t be needed again. The issue is simple. A Welcome to Country frames Australians as guests on their own soil. It is said to be targeted to other ‘Aboriginal nations’ but that is negligible compared to the White guilt it so obviously tries to invoke while contest the sovereignty of Australia. That runs directly against the spirit of ANZAC. The men who served did not fight believing they were guests anywhere on this continent; they fought knowing it was theirs to defend. To imply otherwise, on the most solemn day of national remembrance, is disrespectful. Some will point out that a small number of ANZACs had Indigenous ancestry. That is true. But they made up a tiny fraction of the force, on the order of roughly 99.7–99.8% being of European origin, and the presence of some White passing indigenous does not redefine the purpose of the war effort. Australia fought as a nation for itself, not as a collection of separate nations within its borders (note also Australia at the time had the White Australia Policy). It is also a fact that Indigenous Australians were restricted from enlisting for much of the First World War, and some who did serve did so by concealing their background. Even after the war, many were denied equal treatment, including exclusion from the Returned and Services League, which supported the White Australia policy deep until the 70s. Others argue that booing is inappropriate, but the counterview is that introducing White guilt into a solemn national ceremony invites that reaction, at the very least. The conclusion is straightforward. A Welcome to Country does not belong at a dawn service, its existence is debated elsewhere, but to impose it and its modern political framing onto a moment that is meant to honour the ANZACs... The backlash is a direct response to that imposition.$

Last year, an Aboriginal ‘welcome to country’ at an ANZAC Day dawn service was booed. This year, there are calls to ensure the booing won’t be needed again. The issue is simple. A Welcome to Country frames Australians as guests on their own soil. It is said to be targeted to other ‘Aboriginal nations’ but that is negligible compared to the White guilt it so obviously tries to invoke while contest the sovereignty of Australia. That runs directly against the spirit of ANZAC. The men who served did not fight believing they were guests anywhere on this continent; they fought knowing it was theirs to defend. To imply otherwise, on the most solemn day of national remembrance, is disrespectful. Some will point out that a small number of ANZACs had Indigenous ancestry. That is true. But they made up a tiny fraction of the force, on the order of roughly 99.7–99.8% being of European origin, and the presence of some White passing indigenous does not redefine the purpose of the war effort. Australia fought as a nation for itself, not as a collection of separate nations within its borders (note also Australia at the time had the White Australia Policy). It is also a fact that Indigenous Australians were restricted from enlisting for much of the First World War, and some who did serve did so by concealing their background. Even after the war, many were denied equal treatment, including exclusion from the Returned and Services League, which supported the White Australia policy deep until the 70s. Others argue that booing is inappropriate, but the counterview is that introducing White guilt into a solemn national ceremony invites that reaction, at the very least. The conclusion is straightforward. A Welcome to Country does not belong at a dawn service, its existence is debated elsewhere, but to impose it and its modern political framing onto a moment that is meant to honour the ANZACs... The backlash is a direct response to that imposition.

auspill

46,816 views • 4 months ago