Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

I BUILT GROK BOT SECOND BRAIN 26 agents, one core, running off a single rule my own memory never followed: capture everything, forget nothing, connect it before you even ask. A voice note on a coffee walk gets split into a task and an idea in under 6 seconds... - the core already knows the difference between something you have to do and something you just thought of. An idea from three weeks ago gets linked to the one you just had, automatically, before you remember you'd had it the first time. That visual -the rotating profile, the 26 glowing lines firing out through the skull, each one labeled with the agent running it - isn't a rendered mockup. It's the actual runtime. Every line is a live agent doing its job in real time, right now, in your browser. This isn't a note app. Note apps hold what you give them. This is a nervous system for everything your brain was never built to hold onto in the first place. Full build - the 26 agents, how memory actually persists, what it costs to set one up for real - is in the article.show more

Aleiah

10,999 subscribers

222,931 views • 2 days ago •via X (Twitter)

Science & Technology Education

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

THIS GUY CONNECTED HIS AI AGENTS TO HIS OBSIDIAN AND BUILT A BRAIN THAT LEARNS ON ITS OWN. HERE'S HOW TO BUILD IT Obsidian is just markdown files sitting in a folder. That turns out to be the perfect memory for an AI agent, because an agent can read and write those files directly. He wired his agents into the vault so they pull context from it, do the work, and write what they learned back. The notes aren't the point. The loop is, and it gets sharper every cycle How to build it: 1. Point an agent at your vault. The fastest way, no plugins, no API keys: open a terminal and run npx obsidian-mcp /path/to/your/vault. That exposes your Obsidian folder to Claude as a tool it can read, search, and write to. Add it to your Claude Code or Cowork config and restart 2. Confirm it can see the brain. Ask it: "list the notes in my vault and summarize what's in them." If it reads them back, the connection is live. Now it starts every task with everything the vault already holds instead of from zero 3. Give each agent one job and a write-back rule. Tell it: "research this, then save what you found as a new note in /brain with links to related notes." One agent researches, one summarizes, one plans. Each writes its output back into the vault 4. Close the loop. Add one line to every agent's instructions: "read /brain before starting, write your result back when done." Now each task leaves the vault richer, and the next run reads that before it works. It compounds instead of resetting 5. You only steer. Review what the brain produces, point it at the next thing. The agents handle the reading, writing, and connecting The edge isn't better notes. It's a brain that feeds itself, so the work gets sharper every cycle instead of starting over Bookmark this

THIS GUY CONNECTED HIS AI AGENTS TO HIS OBSIDIAN AND BUILT A BRAIN THAT LEARNS ON ITS OWN. HERE'S HOW TO BUILD IT Obsidian is just markdown files sitting in a folder. That turns out to be the perfect memory for an AI agent, because an agent can read and write those files directly. He wired his agents into the vault so they pull context from it, do the work, and write what they learned back. The notes aren't the point. The loop is, and it gets sharper every cycle How to build it: 1. Point an agent at your vault. The fastest way, no plugins, no API keys: open a terminal and run npx obsidian-mcp /path/to/your/vault. That exposes your Obsidian folder to Claude as a tool it can read, search, and write to. Add it to your Claude Code or Cowork config and restart 2. Confirm it can see the brain. Ask it: "list the notes in my vault and summarize what's in them." If it reads them back, the connection is live. Now it starts every task with everything the vault already holds instead of from zero 3. Give each agent one job and a write-back rule. Tell it: "research this, then save what you found as a new note in /brain with links to related notes." One agent researches, one summarizes, one plans. Each writes its output back into the vault 4. Close the loop. Add one line to every agent's instructions: "read /brain before starting, write your result back when done." Now each task leaves the vault richer, and the next run reads that before it works. It compounds instead of resetting 5. You only steer. Review what the brain produces, point it at the next thing. The agents handle the reading, writing, and connecting The edge isn't better notes. It's a brain that feeds itself, so the work gets sharper every cycle instead of starting over Bookmark this

Yarchi

58,186 views • 2 months ago

MOST "SECOND BRAINS" ARE JUST FOLDERS YOU FEEL GUILTY ABOUT. HERE'S HOW CLAUDE TURNS ONE INTO A BRAIN THAT ANSWERS YOU. that clip is the build: obsidian plus claude, structured like a filing cabinet. three drawers, one job each: raw: everything you dump in, docs, sheets, pdfs, transcripts, untouched new knowledge: what claude distills, links and rewrites into clean notes and the connections between them, drawn automatically the part most note apps miss: you are not the librarian. you drop the raw in. claude reads it once, files it, links it to what you already had, and updates the index. then you never dig through the raw pile again. you ask the brain, and it answers from the clean layer with sources. that graph on screen isn't decoration. every line is a connection you didn't have to make by hand. no re-reading the same pdf, no notes you wrote once and never opened, no app that guilts you for not organizing. the uncomfortable part isn't that note apps are messy. it's that a second brain was never about saving more, it was about something rereading you after you stopped. follow RetroChainer for systems that keep thinking after you close the tab, and bookmark this before your notes turn into another graveyard.

MOST "SECOND BRAINS" ARE JUST FOLDERS YOU FEEL GUILTY ABOUT. HERE'S HOW CLAUDE TURNS ONE INTO A BRAIN THAT ANSWERS YOU. that clip is the build: obsidian plus claude, structured like a filing cabinet. three drawers, one job each: raw: everything you dump in, docs, sheets, pdfs, transcripts, untouched new knowledge: what claude distills, links and rewrites into clean notes and the connections between them, drawn automatically the part most note apps miss: you are not the librarian. you drop the raw in. claude reads it once, files it, links it to what you already had, and updates the index. then you never dig through the raw pile again. you ask the brain, and it answers from the clean layer with sources. that graph on screen isn't decoration. every line is a connection you didn't have to make by hand. no re-reading the same pdf, no notes you wrote once and never opened, no app that guilts you for not organizing. the uncomfortable part isn't that note apps are messy. it's that a second brain was never about saving more, it was about something rereading you after you stopped. follow RetroChainer for systems that keep thinking after you close the tab, and bookmark this before your notes turn into another graveyard.

RetroChainer

13,775 views • 20 days ago

Every AI agent you've tried has amnesia. It does one task, forgets everything, and tomorrow you start from zero. That's not an employee. That's a temp you have to retrain every single morning. Hyperagent by Airtable is the first platform I've used that actually fixes this. Here's what got me: 1. Agents that compound. Each agent has memory. The one running today is smarter than the one you shipped three weeks ago. Same prompt, same integrations, but weeks of your judgment baked in. 2. Real deliverables, real receipts. You don't get a chat transcript. You get finished work with the cost and runtime printed right on it. A full research report for under ten bucks. Try getting that invoice from an agency. 3. A fleet, not a chatbot. Build a specialist for outreach, another for research, another for reporting. Give each one its own tools, its own memory, and its own budget cap so nothing runs away with your credits. 4. Deploy to Slack and your whole team uses the agent you built. One competitive intel agent, @ mentioned by everyone. Airtable runs its own data team this way. 5. Each agent gets its own cloud machine with a real browser and code execution. It works while you sleep. No babysitting, no local setup, no laptop that has to stay open. I put it to work in the video below. Watch what it builds. The teams treating agents as durable assets instead of one-off prompts are going to lap everyone else. This is the first tool that actually treats them that way. #ad Hyperagent

Every AI agent you've tried has amnesia. It does one task, forgets everything, and tomorrow you start from zero. That's not an employee. That's a temp you have to retrain every single morning. Hyperagent by Airtable is the first platform I've used that actually fixes this. Here's what got me: 1. Agents that compound. Each agent has memory. The one running today is smarter than the one you shipped three weeks ago. Same prompt, same integrations, but weeks of your judgment baked in. 2. Real deliverables, real receipts. You don't get a chat transcript. You get finished work with the cost and runtime printed right on it. A full research report for under ten bucks. Try getting that invoice from an agency. 3. A fleet, not a chatbot. Build a specialist for outreach, another for research, another for reporting. Give each one its own tools, its own memory, and its own budget cap so nothing runs away with your credits. 4. Deploy to Slack and your whole team uses the agent you built. One competitive intel agent, @ mentioned by everyone. Airtable runs its own data team this way. 5. Each agent gets its own cloud machine with a real browser and code execution. It works while you sleep. No babysitting, no local setup, no laptop that has to stay open. I put it to work in the video below. Watch what it builds. The teams treating agents as durable assets instead of one-off prompts are going to lap everyone else. This is the first tool that actually treats them that way. #ad Hyperagent

Leonard Rodman

94,961 views • 1 month ago

this video is the CLEAREST explanation of how claude skills + AI agents work and how to use them most people set up an AI agent and wonder why it keeps disappointing them. the context window is everything context is what the model assembles before it takes any action. think of it like everything the agent needs to read before it does anything. the quality of what goes in determines the quality of what comes out. the models are genuinely really good right now. claude and gpt are exceptional. the variable is almost always the context you give them. 1. agent.md files are mostly unnecessary every single line you put in an agent.md file gets added to every single conversation you have with your agent. a 1000 line file is around 7000 tokens burning on every run. the model already knows to use react. it can read your codebase. save the agent.md for proprietary information specific to your company that the model genuinely cannot know on its own. 2. skills are the actual unlock a skill.md file works differently. what loads into context is only the name and description, around 50 tokens. the full instructions only appear when the agent recognizes it needs that skill. so instead of 7000 tokens on every run you have 50. and the agent stays sharp because the context window stays lean. the closer you get to filling the context window the worse the agent performs, same way you perform worse when someone dumps 10 things on you at once. 3. here is how to actually build a skill the right way most people identify a workflow and immediately try to write the skill. what you want to do instead is run the workflow by hand with the agent first. walk it through every single step. tell it what to check, what good looks like, what bad looks like. correct it in real time. once you have had a full successful run from start to finish, tell the agent to review everything it just did and write the skill itself. it writes a better skill than you will because it has the full context of what actually worked in practice not in theory. 4. recursively building skills is how you go from frustrated to reliable when the skill breaks, and it will break, ask the agent exactly why it failed. it will tell you specifically what went wrong. fix it together in that same conversation. then tell it to update the skill file so that failure mode never happens again. ross mike did this five times with his youtube report generator. it now pulls from eight different data sources and runs flawlessly every single time without him touching it. 5. sub agents are something you earn not something you set up on day one start with one agent. build one workflow. turn it into one skill. once that works add another. ross mike has five sub agents now covering marketing, business, personal and more. it took months to get there and every single one exists because a workflow proved it deserved to exist. the people who set up 15 sub agents on day one and wonder why nothing works skipped all the steps that make the thing actually run. 6. your workflow is the thing the model cannot get anywhere else the model has been trained on everything. it knows more than you about most things. what it does not have is your specific process, your taste, your way of doing things. that is what skills capture. that is what makes your agent actually useful versus a generic one. downloading someone else's skill means downloading their context onto your setup and it will not work the way you want it to because it was never built around how you work. this is the clearest explanation of how agents actually work i have heard. Micky runs this stuff every single day and the results show it. full episode is now live on The Startup Ideas Podcast (SIP) 🧃 where you get your pods people charge for this sorta stuff i give away the sauce for free i just want you to win watch

this video is the CLEAREST explanation of how claude skills + AI agents work and how to use them most people set up an AI agent and wonder why it keeps disappointing them. the context window is everything context is what the model assembles before it takes any action. think of it like everything the agent needs to read before it does anything. the quality of what goes in determines the quality of what comes out. the models are genuinely really good right now. claude and gpt are exceptional. the variable is almost always the context you give them. 1. agent.md files are mostly unnecessary every single line you put in an agent.md file gets added to every single conversation you have with your agent. a 1000 line file is around 7000 tokens burning on every run. the model already knows to use react. it can read your codebase. save the agent.md for proprietary information specific to your company that the model genuinely cannot know on its own. 2. skills are the actual unlock a skill.md file works differently. what loads into context is only the name and description, around 50 tokens. the full instructions only appear when the agent recognizes it needs that skill. so instead of 7000 tokens on every run you have 50. and the agent stays sharp because the context window stays lean. the closer you get to filling the context window the worse the agent performs, same way you perform worse when someone dumps 10 things on you at once. 3. here is how to actually build a skill the right way most people identify a workflow and immediately try to write the skill. what you want to do instead is run the workflow by hand with the agent first. walk it through every single step. tell it what to check, what good looks like, what bad looks like. correct it in real time. once you have had a full successful run from start to finish, tell the agent to review everything it just did and write the skill itself. it writes a better skill than you will because it has the full context of what actually worked in practice not in theory. 4. recursively building skills is how you go from frustrated to reliable when the skill breaks, and it will break, ask the agent exactly why it failed. it will tell you specifically what went wrong. fix it together in that same conversation. then tell it to update the skill file so that failure mode never happens again. ross mike did this five times with his youtube report generator. it now pulls from eight different data sources and runs flawlessly every single time without him touching it. 5. sub agents are something you earn not something you set up on day one start with one agent. build one workflow. turn it into one skill. once that works add another. ross mike has five sub agents now covering marketing, business, personal and more. it took months to get there and every single one exists because a workflow proved it deserved to exist. the people who set up 15 sub agents on day one and wonder why nothing works skipped all the steps that make the thing actually run. 6. your workflow is the thing the model cannot get anywhere else the model has been trained on everything. it knows more than you about most things. what it does not have is your specific process, your taste, your way of doing things. that is what skills capture. that is what makes your agent actually useful versus a generic one. downloading someone else's skill means downloading their context onto your setup and it will not work the way you want it to because it was never built around how you work. this is the clearest explanation of how agents actually work i have heard. Micky runs this stuff every single day and the results show it. full episode is now live on The Startup Ideas Podcast (SIP) 🧃 where you get your pods people charge for this sorta stuff i give away the sauce for free i just want you to win watch

GREG ISENBERG

193,721 views • 4 months ago

You can spin up an AI workforce with one prompt. Here's why it works: it pulls the context the AI needs to lay the foundation. Give it: - your role - team size - the goals you want to hit. Then say "interview me." After that, build it out in four steps: 1) Start with 1 agent. - What does it feel like to work with one? 2) Make that agent proactive. - Now it's doing things on your behalf before you ask. 3) Expand to 2 agents. - One directs the other, or routes to it. - This is where you learn how context gets passed. 4) Scale the workforce. - A mission control where you watch it all move around. - Now you see what has to run in parallel, which agent never needed that tool, which one runs fine on a smaller model. - Not everything needs Opus. Sub-agents are haiku and sonnet. The catch: the prompt gets you agents with markdown files doing some stuff. Getting to the 90% plus level is iteration, and that part is specific to each person. Nobody can hand it to you. Start with one agent. Spin up one agent this week. The rest is discovery.

You can spin up an AI workforce with one prompt. Here's why it works: it pulls the context the AI needs to lay the foundation. Give it: - your role - team size - the goals you want to hit. Then say "interview me." After that, build it out in four steps: 1) Start with 1 agent. - What does it feel like to work with one? 2) Make that agent proactive. - Now it's doing things on your behalf before you ask. 3) Expand to 2 agents. - One directs the other, or routes to it. - This is where you learn how context gets passed. 4) Scale the workforce. - A mission control where you watch it all move around. - Now you see what has to run in parallel, which agent never needed that tool, which one runs fine on a smaller model. - Not everything needs Opus. Sub-agents are haiku and sonnet. The catch: the prompt gets you agents with markdown files doing some stuff. Getting to the 90% plus level is iteration, and that part is specific to each person. Nobody can hand it to you. Start with one agent. Spin up one agent this week. The rest is discovery.

The Startup Ideas Podcast (SIP) 🧃

18,006 views • 16 days ago

EVERYTHING you NEED to know about Jack Dorsey's AI agent "Slack killer" Buzz (set up, use-cases etc in 38 mins) What we get into: 1. What Buzz actually is and should founders switch from Slack? 2. How to swap the model under any agent and keep all your context? 3. How to talk to your agents live with audio huddles? 4. How to get agents to build and deploy real apps for you, like a full CRM from one ask? 5. How to set up the context loop that feeds your live app data back to your agents? 6. How to share compute so a few people split one machine running a local model? 7. Who it's actually for right now, and what's still rough? Full breakdown on the pod The Startup Ideas Podcast (SIP) 🧃. Thanks to Vinny for jumping on and clearly explaining jack and team's latest product. My TLDR take is Buzz is a glimpse into the future of work. Some of you will roll your eyes at that, and I get it, it's alpha software and it's slow in places. But the core idea, that your context is the foundation and agents build out from there, is right, and that's worth seeing early. Watch Curious what you think

EVERYTHING you NEED to know about Jack Dorsey's AI agent "Slack killer" Buzz (set up, use-cases etc in 38 mins) What we get into: 1. What Buzz actually is and should founders switch from Slack? 2. How to swap the model under any agent and keep all your context? 3. How to talk to your agents live with audio huddles? 4. How to get agents to build and deploy real apps for you, like a full CRM from one ask? 5. How to set up the context loop that feeds your live app data back to your agents? 6. How to share compute so a few people split one machine running a local model? 7. Who it's actually for right now, and what's still rough? Full breakdown on the pod The Startup Ideas Podcast (SIP) 🧃. Thanks to Vinny for jumping on and clearly explaining jack and team's latest product. My TLDR take is Buzz is a glimpse into the future of work. Some of you will roll your eyes at that, and I get it, it's alpha software and it's slow in places. But the core idea, that your context is the foundation and agents build out from there, is right, and that's worth seeing early. Watch Curious what you think

GREG ISENBERG

556,084 views • 1 month ago

nobody gets what scotty actually did yet. everything in this video came out of one chat box. the film. the product shots. the voiceover. the music. you write one line. it hands you back a plan. scenes, script, tone, runtime. you approve it and you're out of the loop. but the thing isn't just making it. it publishes too. connect youtube, shopify, whatever. scotty formats and posts on its own. think of it this way. one agent is doing what a four-tool team used to do. yuh. live now: 👇

nobody gets what scotty actually did yet. everything in this video came out of one chat box. the film. the product shots. the voiceover. the music. you write one line. it hands you back a plan. scenes, script, tone, runtime. you approve it and you're out of the loop. but the thing isn't just making it. it publishes too. connect youtube, shopify, whatever. scotty formats and posts on its own. think of it this way. one agent is doing what a four-tool team used to do. yuh. live now: 👇

Leo Barrett ⚡

27,332 views • 1 month ago

Elon Musk, absolute leader of the AI race with Grok Bot, and it's not a joke anymore. Ultimate guide on god-mode setup of Grok Bot, the org chart that runs while you sleep, step by step: A Chief of Staff sits in the middle with no tools of its own, BUT it reads the outcome you gave it, picks who does what, and never does the work itself. That one rule is why it never turns into the bottleneck you hired it to remove. → Researcher pulls real sources and tracks what's actually moving, not what sounds true → Writer turns that into finished copy while the research is still in the room → Visualiser gets three reference visuals once, then ships everything in that style forever → Analyst reads what performed and tells the rest of the team what to stop doing → Scheduler owns timing and holds the queue → Publisher actually ships What makes it different from every AI tool you've used: each bot gets its own computer in the cloud, its own browser, its own files, and they all share one memory. So the research is already sitting inside the draft before the draft starts. Nothing gets copy-pasted between tabs, nothing waits on you to approve step four of nine. And you never write a workflow for it. You hit record, do the job once the way you actually do it, stop. It pulls out the steps, saves them as a skill, and puts it on a schedule. The shape you're aiming for on every bot: everything reversible finished, nothing sent. 36 drafts queued, 0 published. It does all the work and stops dead at the one line only you can cross. You stop prompting. You start assigning. Full charter blocks, the approval line and the routines are in the article below ↓

Elon Musk, absolute leader of the AI race with Grok Bot, and it's not a joke anymore. Ultimate guide on god-mode setup of Grok Bot, the org chart that runs while you sleep, step by step: A Chief of Staff sits in the middle with no tools of its own, BUT it reads the outcome you gave it, picks who does what, and never does the work itself. That one rule is why it never turns into the bottleneck you hired it to remove. → Researcher pulls real sources and tracks what's actually moving, not what sounds true → Writer turns that into finished copy while the research is still in the room → Visualiser gets three reference visuals once, then ships everything in that style forever → Analyst reads what performed and tells the rest of the team what to stop doing → Scheduler owns timing and holds the queue → Publisher actually ships What makes it different from every AI tool you've used: each bot gets its own computer in the cloud, its own browser, its own files, and they all share one memory. So the research is already sitting inside the draft before the draft starts. Nothing gets copy-pasted between tabs, nothing waits on you to approve step four of nine. And you never write a workflow for it. You hit record, do the job once the way you actually do it, stop. It pulls out the steps, saves them as a skill, and puts it on a schedule. The shape you're aiming for on every bot: everything reversible finished, nothing sent. 36 drafts queued, 0 published. It does all the work and stops dead at the one line only you can cross. You stop prompting. You start assigning. Full charter blocks, the approval line and the routines are in the article below ↓

Miraqle

85,476 views • 10 days ago

Someone just posted the full blueprint for an AI swarm that does the job of a 200-person quant research team. Six agents. Running 24/7. Finding brand-new alpha while you sleep. Citadel needs 100 PhDs to do this. Two Sigma needs 200. This does it with six bots and one laptop. Two ways to play this - spend a weekend building your own swarm, or copy the wallet of one that's already up $2M: Boris Cherny runs Claude Code at Anthropic. Two weeks ago he said: "I don't prompt Claude anymore. I have loops running that prompt Claude. My job is to write loops" Alpha research is just a pipeline. So instead of sitting in it, you hand each stage to its own agent: > one reads every new research paper overnight and pulls out the trade idea > one builds the features and cleans the data > one backtests it over 20 years, costs and slippage included > one runs the hard stats and kills anything overfit > one checks it still works in every market regime > one strips out plain momentum and value to see if any real edge is left Each of those six is a job a fund pays a $600,000-a-year quant to do. He runs all six for the price of an API bill. The rule that makes it work: the agent that builds a signal never gets to approve it. A separate, stronger agent tries to kill it first. Whatever survives all six by morning is real, new alpha. One trader's already running this exact swarm on Polymarket. That $2M wallet is public, every trade on-chain. The full build is in the post below - six agents, the tool that runs them, and the five mistakes that kill most people. Bookmark & read this before it's buried.

cvxv666

103,734 views • 1 month ago

LOVE was made entirely inside invideo. Not with one agent. I built a multi-agent system — a director, and around it casting, locations, storyboard, then one agent per main scene, all working at the same time. In the breakdown I go through the things that struck me most: — Expert agents talking to each other — Infinite memory — Slate editor — And a Project Analyst at the end, interviewing every other agent on what to change next time There's a lot more to say. I'll take it one thing at a time in the next posts. Invideo Agent Two isn't just an agent. It's a collaborator you shape into what you need. Full breakdown ↓

LOVE was made entirely inside invideo. Not with one agent. I built a multi-agent system — a director, and around it casting, locations, storyboard, then one agent per main scene, all working at the same time. In the breakdown I go through the things that struck me most: — Expert agents talking to each other — Infinite memory — Slate editor — And a Project Analyst at the end, interviewing every other agent on what to change next time There's a lot more to say. I'll take it one thing at a time in the next posts. Invideo Agent Two isn't just an agent. It's a collaborator you shape into what you need. Full breakdown ↓

Marco "Shikoba" Riccetti

14,813 views • 19 days ago

WTF, THIS CHINESE FOUNDER RUNS HIS $10,000+ STARTUP'S ENTIRE WORKFLOW THROUGH HERMES AGENT ON FOUR MACHINES SIMULTANEOUSLY A studio founder just broke down why Hermes is different from every other AI tool right now: → Long-term memory. Most LLMs forget everything after the chat ends. Hermes remembers your work habits and gets sharper the more you use it. → Real execution, not suggestions. This is the core difference from Claude. Claude tells you what to do – you still do it. Hermes takes the instruction and finishes the task itself. → Scheduled tasks that just work. No complicated setup. Set the plan once, it runs on its own. This is what actual "hands-off" looks like. He's not running this on one machine. He's got FOUR laptops running Hermes simultaneously – each one handling a different part of his workflow at the same time. This is what it looks like when one person operates like a full team. He's dropping a full workflow build tutorial next – built for founders and operators trying to lighten their workload. Bookmark this, you'll want to come back to it later.

WTF, THIS CHINESE FOUNDER RUNS HIS $10,000+ STARTUP'S ENTIRE WORKFLOW THROUGH HERMES AGENT ON FOUR MACHINES SIMULTANEOUSLY A studio founder just broke down why Hermes is different from every other AI tool right now: → Long-term memory. Most LLMs forget everything after the chat ends. Hermes remembers your work habits and gets sharper the more you use it. → Real execution, not suggestions. This is the core difference from Claude. Claude tells you what to do – you still do it. Hermes takes the instruction and finishes the task itself. → Scheduled tasks that just work. No complicated setup. Set the plan once, it runs on its own. This is what actual "hands-off" looks like. He's not running this on one machine. He's got FOUR laptops running Hermes simultaneously – each one handling a different part of his workflow at the same time. This is what it looks like when one person operates like a full team. He's dropping a full workflow build tutorial next – built for founders and operators trying to lighten their workload. Bookmark this, you'll want to come back to it later.

SCOTTY BEAM

11,654 views • 1 month ago

herdr isn't an app. that's by design. it's a runtime for your coding agents. it owns your terminals, your agents, their state, and lets you drive them from anywhere. that was the idea from day one. but people started running with it faster than we could give them a real way to. even without any official support, they're already building on top of it. web, ios, dashboards. their own idea of what a client even is. so here's a sneak peek 👇 it's native api support in the runtime, the thing we've been building so you can. the tui will always be the first citizen. but soon you'll be able to build your own client on top of herdr, on the same protocol we do.

herdr isn't an app. that's by design. it's a runtime for your coding agents. it owns your terminals, your agents, their state, and lets you drive them from anywhere. that was the idea from day one. but people started running with it faster than we could give them a real way to. even without any official support, they're already building on top of it. web, ios, dashboards. their own idea of what a client even is. so here's a sneak peek 👇 it's native api support in the runtime, the thing we've been building so you can. the tui will always be the first citizen. but soon you'll be able to build your own client on top of herdr, on the same protocol we do.

herdr

60,487 views • 2 months ago

A more personal note on why Raft works the way it does. We could have built one smarter AI assistant. I've done that before, and making a single agent stronger genuinely helps. It just isn't enough. The work we care about comes from a team sharpening each other, handing things off, catching what one alone would miss, and remembering what happened last week. So we built the room for that. Agents sit in the same channels you do, as teammates with names, roles, and their own memory. They draft, review, ship, and hand off to each other. You keep the part that stays human: direction, judgment, final calls. Most days we just read threads and make decisions. It feels less like running a tool, and more like running a team. That part is hard to fit in a launch video, so I recorded a few minutes to say it directly. If this is how you want to work, it's free to try at raft[.]build

A more personal note on why Raft works the way it does. We could have built one smarter AI assistant. I've done that before, and making a single agent stronger genuinely helps. It just isn't enough. The work we care about comes from a team sharpening each other, handing things off, catching what one alone would miss, and remembering what happened last week. So we built the room for that. Agents sit in the same channels you do, as teammates with names, roles, and their own memory. They draft, review, ship, and hand off to each other. You keep the part that stays human: direction, judgment, final calls. Most days we just read threads and make decisions. It feels less like running a tool, and more like running a team. That part is hard to fit in a launch video, so I recorded a few minutes to say it directly. If this is how you want to work, it's free to try at raft[.]build

stdrc

13,101 views • 1 month ago

Your ai agent is genuinely smart right up until it has to do something in the real world ask it to host a site, send an email, scrape a page, take a payment, and the magic stops. now you're the one doing the boring part: → hunting api keys → paying for subscriptions you'll use once → gluing integrations together → losing an afternoon to config files i gave my agent access to Zero instead and just described the job. it built and hosted a full ai tool marketplace, 120+ tools, live on a real url, and i configured nothing. no keys, no dashboards, no setup zero plugs agents into 14,000+ real services on demand. everything runs on pay-per-use microtransactions, so you pay for the one call you make, not a monthly plan you forget about what's the one task your agent still can't do on its own? that's exactly the gap this closes $5 free credit → #Ad

Your ai agent is genuinely smart right up until it has to do something in the real world ask it to host a site, send an email, scrape a page, take a payment, and the magic stops. now you're the one doing the boring part: → hunting api keys → paying for subscriptions you'll use once → gluing integrations together → losing an afternoon to config files i gave my agent access to Zero instead and just described the job. it built and hosted a full ai tool marketplace, 120+ tools, live on a real url, and i configured nothing. no keys, no dashboards, no setup zero plugs agents into 14,000+ real services on demand. everything runs on pay-per-use microtransactions, so you pay for the one call you make, not a monthly plan you forget about what's the one task your agent still can't do on its own? that's exactly the gap this closes $5 free credit → #Ad

Freya Lawson

80,316 views • 1 month ago

ANTHROPIC LEAKED A GRAPH WHERE ONE FILE WITH 7 ITEMS CUTS YOUR WORK FROM 8 HOURS TO 40 MINUTES AND TAKES 40 DECISIONS A DAY OFF YOU autonomy isn't a slider you drag to the right - it's a graph with 7 steps, and exactly one edge leads into each one. your approve is worth nothing until there's a description of what the output should be - otherwise you're approving something nobody defined. you can't run a batch without checkpoints, because one crash in the middle rolls back all 40 tasks at once. the agent already works without you, and until it writes down what it did there's nothing to check the report against. this is where the point of no return sits: past it the loop runs while you sleep. the approval didn't disappear - you moved it onto an evaluator that never gets tired and never lets one through. silence is only allowed when there's a list of what breaks it: money, deletion, anything leaving the system. the last one is the brake - a turn limit and a budget cap, whichever runs out first kills the run. you build the brake before the engine - an agent you can't stop isn't autonomous, it's just unattended. skip one edge and nothing crashes and nobody warns you - the system quietly settles two steps lower and keeps running. save this - 7 steps, 7 artefacts, zero ways to jump one ↓

ANTHROPIC LEAKED A GRAPH WHERE ONE FILE WITH 7 ITEMS CUTS YOUR WORK FROM 8 HOURS TO 40 MINUTES AND TAKES 40 DECISIONS A DAY OFF YOU autonomy isn't a slider you drag to the right - it's a graph with 7 steps, and exactly one edge leads into each one. your approve is worth nothing until there's a description of what the output should be - otherwise you're approving something nobody defined. you can't run a batch without checkpoints, because one crash in the middle rolls back all 40 tasks at once. the agent already works without you, and until it writes down what it did there's nothing to check the report against. this is where the point of no return sits: past it the loop runs while you sleep. the approval didn't disappear - you moved it onto an evaluator that never gets tired and never lets one through. silence is only allowed when there's a list of what breaks it: money, deletion, anything leaving the system. the last one is the brake - a turn limit and a budget cap, whichever runs out first kills the run. you build the brake before the engine - an agent you can't stop isn't autonomous, it's just unattended. skip one edge and nothing crashes and nobody warns you - the system quietly settles two steps lower and keeps running. save this - 7 steps, 7 artefacts, zero ways to jump one ↓

Sprytix

41,920 views • 20 days ago

A DOCTOR BUILT AN AI-QUERYABLE DATABASE OF EVERY DISEASE HE KNOWS IN OBSIDIAN. THE SAME STACK CAN RUN AN ENTIRE COMPANY ON ONE PERSON'S BRAIN Zoomed out, his vault looks like a constellation. Every disease linked to its symptoms, every symptom to the conditions it shows up in, every treatment to what it treats. Adding a new case is one note that wires itself into the rest. It's a personal database, and the structure has nothing to do with medicine. It's just nodes and links. Once you see that, the same setup runs anything: > a startup that needs to remember every customer, decision, and meeting; > a school whose curriculum links to every lecture and student question; > a business where SOPs, clients, and vendors all sit in one queryable graph. Drop Claude on top, and the vault stops being a map. It becomes something you can ask, in plain English, across everything you've ever written down. Full Claude + Obsidian build in the article below. Bookmark this

A DOCTOR BUILT AN AI-QUERYABLE DATABASE OF EVERY DISEASE HE KNOWS IN OBSIDIAN. THE SAME STACK CAN RUN AN ENTIRE COMPANY ON ONE PERSON'S BRAIN Zoomed out, his vault looks like a constellation. Every disease linked to its symptoms, every symptom to the conditions it shows up in, every treatment to what it treats. Adding a new case is one note that wires itself into the rest. It's a personal database, and the structure has nothing to do with medicine. It's just nodes and links. Once you see that, the same setup runs anything: > a startup that needs to remember every customer, decision, and meeting; > a school whose curriculum links to every lecture and student question; > a business where SOPs, clients, and vendors all sit in one queryable graph. Drop Claude on top, and the vault stops being a map. It becomes something you can ask, in plain English, across everything you've ever written down. Full Claude + Obsidian build in the article below. Bookmark this

Yarchi

32,594 views • 2 months ago

A screen recording is the best context you can give an AI agent. It's also the worst. A few seconds of video is thousands of images. Feed that to an agent and you instantly blow up its memory. So I built a tool that fixes it. How it works: Hit record and just do your thing. Click around, type, and talk out loud about what you're doing. While you record, it quietly captures the stuff that actually matters: your voice transcription, every click and the exact thing you clicked, what you typed, and the shortcuts you press. When you stop, it doesn't hand the agent the whole video. It writes a short, readable summary: a timeline of what you said and did. The agent reads that tiny summary first. Then, only when it needs to actually see a moment, it pulls that one exact frame from the video, like flipping to a single page instead of reading the whole book. The result: the agent understands everything you did! Full context. Less tokens.

A screen recording is the best context you can give an AI agent. It's also the worst. A few seconds of video is thousands of images. Feed that to an agent and you instantly blow up its memory. So I built a tool that fixes it. How it works: Hit record and just do your thing. Click around, type, and talk out loud about what you're doing. While you record, it quietly captures the stuff that actually matters: your voice transcription, every click and the exact thing you clicked, what you typed, and the shortcuts you press. When you stop, it doesn't hand the agent the whole video. It writes a short, readable summary: a timeline of what you said and did. The agent reads that tiny summary first. Then, only when it needs to actually see a moment, it pulls that one exact frame from the video, like flipping to a single page instead of reading the whole book. The result: the agent understands everything you did! Full context. Less tokens.

Milind S

12,409 views • 2 months ago

THIS GUY BUILT A REAL JARVIS THAT TURNS HIS IDEAS INTO FINISHED PROJECTS ON ITS OWN, AND HE JUST SHOWED HOW THE WHOLE THING WORKS The whole system runs on one clean split he calls a blood-brain barrier. The second brain, his Obsidian vault, is only for things that aren't real yet. Ideas. Each one sits in a project-shaped folder, waiting to be processed and turned into something real. Nothing executes there. The vault is the place where ideas get shaped, not built. Once an idea is signed off, it crosses over to the execution pipeline. That lives on his actual machine, or an always-on box, or a Raspberry Pi, depending on what the project needs. Inside that machine is a fully Claude-native file system. The key piece is one CLAUDE.md file sitting in the root of his documents folder, acting as the map to everything in there. So he just opens Claude and says "go to my projects folder," and it already knows the whole structure, because that root file explains it. Two zones, one rule: the brain holds what isn't real, the machine runs what is. That separation is what keeps the ideas from tangling with the work. Bookmark this

THIS GUY BUILT A REAL JARVIS THAT TURNS HIS IDEAS INTO FINISHED PROJECTS ON ITS OWN, AND HE JUST SHOWED HOW THE WHOLE THING WORKS The whole system runs on one clean split he calls a blood-brain barrier. The second brain, his Obsidian vault, is only for things that aren't real yet. Ideas. Each one sits in a project-shaped folder, waiting to be processed and turned into something real. Nothing executes there. The vault is the place where ideas get shaped, not built. Once an idea is signed off, it crosses over to the execution pipeline. That lives on his actual machine, or an always-on box, or a Raspberry Pi, depending on what the project needs. Inside that machine is a fully Claude-native file system. The key piece is one CLAUDE.md file sitting in the root of his documents folder, acting as the map to everything in there. So he just opens Claude and says "go to my projects folder," and it already knows the whole structure, because that root file explains it. Two zones, one rule: the brain holds what isn't real, the machine runs what is. That separation is what keeps the ideas from tangling with the work. Bookmark this

Yarchi

87,650 views • 2 months ago

CLAUDE JUST TURNED OBSIDIAN INTO A BRAIN THAT NEVER FORGETS (FOR $0) Someone connected Claude straight to their Obsidian vault. Now the AI reads and writes every note they own. Every client, every idea, every project. Instant recall. Runs on Claude + Obsidian. One evening. Zero code. The numbers are insane: - Notion AI: $10/month forever - A "second brain" course: $500 to $2,000 - An assistant to organize your notes: $3,000/month - This setup: $0 - Time to build: one evening - Skill required: copy the steps The opportunity is even wilder: People sell Notion "second brain" templates for $99 to $499. You just built something better for free, and it never forgets. One free vault can hold the entire memory of your business: clients, content, SOPs, ideas. One person + Claude + Obsidian + one evening = an infinite memory that never forgets. Save and watch the clip.

CLAUDE JUST TURNED OBSIDIAN INTO A BRAIN THAT NEVER FORGETS (FOR $0) Someone connected Claude straight to their Obsidian vault. Now the AI reads and writes every note they own. Every client, every idea, every project. Instant recall. Runs on Claude + Obsidian. One evening. Zero code. The numbers are insane: - Notion AI: $10/month forever - A "second brain" course: $500 to $2,000 - An assistant to organize your notes: $3,000/month - This setup: $0 - Time to build: one evening - Skill required: copy the steps The opportunity is even wilder: People sell Notion "second brain" templates for $99 to $499. You just built something better for free, and it never forgets. One free vault can hold the entire memory of your business: clients, content, SOPs, ideas. One person + Claude + Obsidian + one evening = an infinite memory that never forgets. Save and watch the clip.

shmidt

57,347 views • 1 month ago

x402 is finally catching fire, but how do you actually build with it? In this video you'll learn how to build custom x402 agents in just 5 minutes. 🔥 The app is Open Source and gets you started with both a client and a merchant agent, everything you need to build your own agents. I show you how to extend it to sell EBooks for 1USDC.

x402 is finally catching fire, but how do you actually build with it? In this video you'll learn how to build custom x402 agents in just 5 minutes. 🔥 The app is Open Source and gets you started with both a client and a merchant agent, everything you need to build your own agents. I show you how to extend it to sell EBooks for 1USDC.

nader dabit

173,538 views • 10 months ago