Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

i fired my whole team and hired spiders seven Grok Bots on one computer, $20 a night, $675 of work shipped while i slept that is them on your screen, the tape from last night each bot owns one lane: - research briefs before the morning call - inbox... show more

Phosphen

15,935 subscribers

301,062 görüntüleme • 19 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

Bilim & Teknoloji

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

SpaceXAI engineer, ex-Cursor: "I run my whole company on a 12-bot Grok team, $300 a month, zero employees they work a 168-hour week, I work maybe 6 and we still outship the 8-person team I used to pay for" in a 1-hour workshop, a SpaceXAI engineer builds a full Grok Bot team from scratch, skills and loops included worth more than a $500 course on agentic engineering watch today, then read how to run your own one-person company on Grok Bots in the article below

SpaceXAI engineer, ex-Cursor: "I run my whole company on a 12-bot Grok team, $300 a month, zero employees they work a 168-hour week, I work maybe 6 and we still outship the 8-person team I used to pay for" in a 1-hour workshop, a SpaceXAI engineer builds a full Grok Bot team from scratch, skills and loops included worth more than a $500 course on agentic engineering watch today, then read how to run your own one-person company on Grok Bots in the article below

KingWilliam

295,920 görüntüleme • 12 gün önce

SpaceXAI engineer, ex-Cursor: "i replaced a project manager, a designer and a developer with three bots and a group chat we shipped 9 features last quarter, and i sat in zero meetings to do it it's a $1M run rate with one name on the payroll, mine" in a 29-minute session, a SpaceXAI engineer builds a full team of Grok Bots from scratch, with one agent managing the rest the bots were never the hard part. keeping them from forgetting what you decided last week is watch it, then build the one-person version with the 12-step system in the article below

SpaceXAI engineer, ex-Cursor: "i replaced a project manager, a designer and a developer with three bots and a group chat we shipped 9 features last quarter, and i sat in zero meetings to do it it's a $1M run rate with one name on the payroll, mine" in a 29-minute session, a SpaceXAI engineer builds a full team of Grok Bots from scratch, with one agent managing the rest the bots were never the hard part. keeping them from forgetting what you decided last week is watch it, then build the one-person version with the 12-step system in the article below

KingWilliam

20,656 görüntüleme • 7 gün önce

Jamie Dimon made $39 million last year to decide who does what at JPMorgan. One AI agent on Grok Bot does that job for $300 a month, and it hires the rest of the agents itself. Stop trying to manage any of it yourself. In 2026 a swarm of AI agents runs a team better than you do. I told my chief agent one thing. Make money or I switch you off. It took $1,000 to $3,900 in 15 hours. Every fill is on chain and the address is in my profile. I never picked a trade. I never picked a team either. The agents it hired: > a scout that hunts for what is moving and where the money is going > a forensics agent that works out who is really behind the buying > a reader that watches the mood on X, and it sees every post on this app because it is Grok > a risk agent whose only power is saying no, and its no beats every score on the desk > a treasurer that holds the money rules and the kill switch > a trader that writes the exit before it writes the entry None of those were my idea. I handed out one job title and the chief filled in the rest on its own. And the swarm is different every hour. Agents appear for one job, do it, and are gone before I know they existed. A hedge fund pays millions a year for the same org chart, and almost all of that goes on salaries. Every prompt and the whole story of my Grok Bot fund is in the post below ↓ Save it before you try to run one of these by hand.

cvxv666

28,886 görüntüleme • 18 gün önce

ran Grok Bot and Hermes Agent side by side for the same job here's what actually separates them Grok Bot: - gets its own cloud computer, browser, files, terminal, logs into your tools with your credentials - learns by demonstration, record a task once, it saves the routine - runs on Grok, you don't choose the model - all your bots share the same cloud computer and the same logins, no isolation between them - scales by subscription, ~$200/mo solo, ~$120/seat for teams Hermes Agent: - open source, MIT-licensed, no cloud, you host it - each agent gets its own real badge from your identity provider, scoped access only, revoke it and it's gone - brain is swappable, change one config line to switch models - scales by spinning up containers on demand, hire/fire based on backlog - you own the maintenance, an upstream installer change broke one build, one line fix, one morning lost the real fork isn't features, it's where the work happens and who's accountable when it breaks grok bot: convenience, zero setup, but your data sits on their machine and every bot shares every login hermes: more setup, but scoped access, swappable models, and nothing running outside your own network for anything touching regulated or sensitive data, that architecture difference is the whole decision

ran Grok Bot and Hermes Agent side by side for the same job here's what actually separates them Grok Bot: - gets its own cloud computer, browser, files, terminal, logs into your tools with your credentials - learns by demonstration, record a task once, it saves the routine - runs on Grok, you don't choose the model - all your bots share the same cloud computer and the same logins, no isolation between them - scales by subscription, ~$200/mo solo, ~$120/seat for teams Hermes Agent: - open source, MIT-licensed, no cloud, you host it - each agent gets its own real badge from your identity provider, scoped access only, revoke it and it's gone - brain is swappable, change one config line to switch models - scales by spinning up containers on demand, hire/fire based on backlog - you own the maintenance, an upstream installer change broke one build, one line fix, one morning lost the real fork isn't features, it's where the work happens and who's accountable when it breaks grok bot: convenience, zero setup, but your data sits on their machine and every bot shares every login hermes: more setup, but scoped access, swappable models, and nothing running outside your own network for anything touching regulated or sensitive data, that architecture difference is the whole decision

rewind

31,308 görüntüleme • 20 gün önce

One bot. One prompt. It hired its own team. I created a single Grok Bot - Atlas, chief of staff - and pasted one prompt. It interviewed me, wrote its own operating manual, specced four teammates, and launched them. Watch the sidebar: Kit, Studio, Ship, Peak come online one by one. Each of them gets its own computer in the cloud. Six routines scheduled. The team runs while my laptop is closed. And nothing sends, posts, or ships without my yes. That rule is in the prompt. Full setup prompt in the first reply. Steal it.

One bot. One prompt. It hired its own team. I created a single Grok Bot - Atlas, chief of staff - and pasted one prompt. It interviewed me, wrote its own operating manual, specced four teammates, and launched them. Watch the sidebar: Kit, Studio, Ship, Peak come online one by one. Each of them gets its own computer in the cloud. Six routines scheduled. The team runs while my laptop is closed. And nothing sends, posts, or ships without my yes. That rule is in the prompt. Full setup prompt in the first reply. Steal it.

nyk

30,830 görüntüleme • 28 gün önce

BlackRock runs on 20,000 people. Elon's Grok Bot runs the same shape for $300 a month, and it hires its own staff. You do not get an assistant. You get a company that hires. It does not throw ten agents at your problem and hand you the pile. It makes one agent that makes 10, and those ten make a 100. > LAYER ONE is one agent, the chief of staff, and it never touches the market > LAYER TWO is six desk heads, one job each, every one on its own computer with its own logins > LAYER THREE is whatever those six decide they need, spun up on the spot and shut down when the work is done Nobody writes a task list. You hand out job titles and the org fills itself in underneath. The swarm is never the same twice. Agents get spun up for one job, finish it, and are gone before I ever read their names. Not one of them sees the whole picture. The answer only exists after they hand off to each other. Wall Street cannot copy that. You cannot hire a hundred people for eleven minutes. BlackRock holds that shape together with a risk system called Aladdin. Mine holds it together with one agent that is only allowed to say no. I gave it $1,000 and told it to grow the money or get deleted. 15 hours later it was holding $3,900, on an address anyone can open and read. I was asleep for most of it, and I have still not written a line of code. The whole thing runs with my laptop shut, because none of it lives on my laptop. Setup is one evening. Create the chief, hand out the titles, run one trade on your screen while they watch, connect Telegram. Ten years ago a machine this shape had its name on a tower. Mine has a name I typed into a box. Save this while the whole thing still fits on one screen.

BlackRock runs on 20,000 people. Elon's Grok Bot runs the same shape for $300 a month, and it hires its own staff. You do not get an assistant. You get a company that hires. It does not throw ten agents at your problem and hand you the pile. It makes one agent that makes 10, and those ten make a 100. > LAYER ONE is one agent, the chief of staff, and it never touches the market > LAYER TWO is six desk heads, one job each, every one on its own computer with its own logins > LAYER THREE is whatever those six decide they need, spun up on the spot and shut down when the work is done Nobody writes a task list. You hand out job titles and the org fills itself in underneath. The swarm is never the same twice. Agents get spun up for one job, finish it, and are gone before I ever read their names. Not one of them sees the whole picture. The answer only exists after they hand off to each other. Wall Street cannot copy that. You cannot hire a hundred people for eleven minutes. BlackRock holds that shape together with a risk system called Aladdin. Mine holds it together with one agent that is only allowed to say no. I gave it $1,000 and told it to grow the money or get deleted. 15 hours later it was holding $3,900, on an address anyone can open and read. I was asleep for most of it, and I have still not written a line of code. The whole thing runs with my laptop shut, because none of it lives on my laptop. Setup is one evening. Create the chief, hand out the titles, run one trade on your screen while they watch, connect Telegram. Ten years ago a machine this shape had its name on a tower. Mine has a name I typed into a box. Save this while the whole thing still fits on one screen.

cvxv666

45,488 görüntüleme • 19 gün önce

My friend called me and asked the best way to set up personal agents for his daily life. So I made this video for him. It takes you from zero to agents running, using the easiest and best 24/7 agent harness right now. All for $20 a month. I already have tons of them running my personal life. One buys my groceries. One reads my email. One sends me something to learn every morning at 8 AM. Here's the walkthrough, from easy mode to god mode. Easy Mode: what GrokBot actually is Definition: a chat with a computer behind it. Grok Bot (from Cursor and xAI) spins up one virtual machine in the cloud. Every bot you build shares it, and it stays on when your laptop is closed. Two things to know: 1) It starts at a $20 a month Cursor Pro plan. It used to need the $300 tier. 2) Give every bot one job and a name. Mine is Barry. He's my personal assistant and he checks on the other bots every hour. Hard Mode: giving your bots a credit card, an inbox, and a phone. Definition: the stuff a bot needs to actually do things in the real world, not just talk about them. Rules of thumb: 1) Payments. Don't put your credit card on the VM. It's beta. Use the Stripe Link CLI instead, so the card never sits on the machine. Then add a hard rule that the bot needs your yes before any purchase. 2) Email. Give your bot its own address. I use Agent Mail (free). Sign up for new services with it, send your junk there, and let the bot triage every six hours and only ping you when something needs a reply. 3) Phone. Give your bot a number and it can make reservations, call vendors, and take calls for you. I haven't set mine up yet, but people are already doing it. God Mode: the fleet Definition: a channel where your bots talk to each other and you only talk to the lead. Rules of thumb: 1) Keep your bots small and specific to each task. Have an orchestra bot to help coordinate the rest. 2) Long threads plus frequent routines burn credits fast. Have each bot write a daily summary to one channel, then have your lead bot read that one channel instead of every conversation. Full walkthrough:

My friend called me and asked the best way to set up personal agents for his daily life. So I made this video for him. It takes you from zero to agents running, using the easiest and best 24/7 agent harness right now. All for $20 a month. I already have tons of them running my personal life. One buys my groceries. One reads my email. One sends me something to learn every morning at 8 AM. Here's the walkthrough, from easy mode to god mode. Easy Mode: what GrokBot actually is Definition: a chat with a computer behind it. Grok Bot (from Cursor and xAI) spins up one virtual machine in the cloud. Every bot you build shares it, and it stays on when your laptop is closed. Two things to know: 1) It starts at a $20 a month Cursor Pro plan. It used to need the $300 tier. 2) Give every bot one job and a name. Mine is Barry. He's my personal assistant and he checks on the other bots every hour. Hard Mode: giving your bots a credit card, an inbox, and a phone. Definition: the stuff a bot needs to actually do things in the real world, not just talk about them. Rules of thumb: 1) Payments. Don't put your credit card on the VM. It's beta. Use the Stripe Link CLI instead, so the card never sits on the machine. Then add a hard rule that the bot needs your yes before any purchase. 2) Email. Give your bot its own address. I use Agent Mail (free). Sign up for new services with it, send your junk there, and let the bot triage every six hours and only ping you when something needs a reply. 3) Phone. Give your bot a number and it can make reservations, call vendors, and take calls for you. I haven't set mine up yet, but people are already doing it. God Mode: the fleet Definition: a channel where your bots talk to each other and you only talk to the lead. Rules of thumb: 1) Keep your bots small and specific to each task. Have an orchestra bot to help coordinate the rest. 2) Long threads plus frequent routines burn credits fast. Have each bot write a daily summary to one channel, then have your lead bot read that one channel instead of every conversation. Full walkthrough:

JJ Englert

82,282 görüntüleme • 3 gün önce

WTF, GROK BOT JUST MADE AI AGENTS AVAILABLE TO LITERALLY ANYONE – CREATING CONTENT HAS NEVER BEEN THIS EASY, EVEN IF YOU'VE NEVER MADE ANYTHING BEFORE Content was never a talent problem. It's a headcount problem. One person doing research, design, copy, analytics, timing and publishing – that's six jobs. The switching between them is what kills consistency, not a lack of ideas. Here's what one of these setups actually looks like. A Chief of Staff sits in the middle and routes every task. Nothing lands on the human. → Researcher tracks what's actually moving and pulls real sources instead of guesswork → Writer turns that research into finished copy, ready to review → Visualiser gets fed a few reference visuals once, then ships everything in that style → Analyst reads the numbers and tells the rest of the team what worked → Scheduler owns timing and holds the queue → Publisher ships it The part that makes it work: every agent on Grok Bot gets its own persistent computer, browser and file system – and they all share memory. So the research is already sitting inside the draft before the draft starts. No copy-pasting between tools. No approving every step. No human in the middle. You can even teach an agent a repetitive task by recording yourself doing it once. Start recording, do the thing, stop. It learns the pattern. And that's the real shift. Nobody needs AI to tell them what to post. They need it to delete the 40 steps between the idea and the post. Everyone has a backlog of things they've meant to make for months. This is what starts clearing it. Full breakdown of the setup in the article below ↓

WTF, GROK BOT JUST MADE AI AGENTS AVAILABLE TO LITERALLY ANYONE – CREATING CONTENT HAS NEVER BEEN THIS EASY, EVEN IF YOU'VE NEVER MADE ANYTHING BEFORE Content was never a talent problem. It's a headcount problem. One person doing research, design, copy, analytics, timing and publishing – that's six jobs. The switching between them is what kills consistency, not a lack of ideas. Here's what one of these setups actually looks like. A Chief of Staff sits in the middle and routes every task. Nothing lands on the human. → Researcher tracks what's actually moving and pulls real sources instead of guesswork → Writer turns that research into finished copy, ready to review → Visualiser gets fed a few reference visuals once, then ships everything in that style → Analyst reads the numbers and tells the rest of the team what worked → Scheduler owns timing and holds the queue → Publisher ships it The part that makes it work: every agent on Grok Bot gets its own persistent computer, browser and file system – and they all share memory. So the research is already sitting inside the draft before the draft starts. No copy-pasting between tools. No approving every step. No human in the middle. You can even teach an agent a repetitive task by recording yourself doing it once. Start recording, do the thing, stop. It learns the pattern. And that's the real shift. Nobody needs AI to tell them what to post. They need it to delete the 40 steps between the idea and the post. Everyone has a backlog of things they've meant to make for months. This is what starts clearing it. Full breakdown of the setup in the article below ↓

SCOTTY BEAM

4,818,742 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

I TURNED $89 INTO $30,845.78 WITH SIX GROK BOTS AND ONE F*CKING GUIDE. LAST NIGHT THEY PRINTED +31.94% WHILE I SLEPT $89 in August. $1,000 when the duel started on the 10th. $30,845.78 last night no new money went in. ever last shift printed +$7,467.14, that is +31.94% in twenty hours on one cat coin and here is the part that should piss you off. nothing here is clever → 28 positions closed, 22 green. the biggest bought 151.9M, sold 169.6M, +$1,235.77 on a $10,594 buy → the boring seven hours paid $4,222.64, the 27% pump paid $2,684.91 → four times they bought a price already running. all four red, -$407.54 → six side bets on prediction markets, +$967.14 → the coin did +25.70% on its own. the bots did +31.94% with the same coin → every number above is marked on the chart in the clip i did not build a fund. i wrote one setup guide and six Grok bots run it one bot scans, one checks, one sizes, one fills, one books the bets, one kills anything that smells like a chase that is it. that is the whole edge it works on $89 the same way it works on $30,000. the rule is a percentage, not an amount the bots predict nothing. the risk one prints the same line all night: "size the boring trade, never the runner" a signal group charges $400 a month to send an entry two hours late and never posts its losses the full setup is in the article below. every prompt, the size rule, where each bot breaks. free, no dm bookmark it before the feed buries it if you had started with $89 eight days ago, where would you be right now?

I TURNED $89 INTO $30,845.78 WITH SIX GROK BOTS AND ONE F*CKING GUIDE. LAST NIGHT THEY PRINTED +31.94% WHILE I SLEPT $89 in August. $1,000 when the duel started on the 10th. $30,845.78 last night no new money went in. ever last shift printed +$7,467.14, that is +31.94% in twenty hours on one cat coin and here is the part that should piss you off. nothing here is clever → 28 positions closed, 22 green. the biggest bought 151.9M, sold 169.6M, +$1,235.77 on a $10,594 buy → the boring seven hours paid $4,222.64, the 27% pump paid $2,684.91 → four times they bought a price already running. all four red, -$407.54 → six side bets on prediction markets, +$967.14 → the coin did +25.70% on its own. the bots did +31.94% with the same coin → every number above is marked on the chart in the clip i did not build a fund. i wrote one setup guide and six Grok bots run it one bot scans, one checks, one sizes, one fills, one books the bets, one kills anything that smells like a chase that is it. that is the whole edge it works on $89 the same way it works on $30,000. the rule is a percentage, not an amount the bots predict nothing. the risk one prints the same line all night: "size the boring trade, never the runner" a signal group charges $400 a month to send an entry two hours late and never posts its losses the full setup is in the article below. every prompt, the size rule, where each bot breaks. free, no dm bookmark it before the feed buries it if you had started with $89 eight days ago, where would you be right now?

savip.

56,557 görüntüleme • 2 gün önce

Elon Musk, absolute leader of the AI race with Grok Bot, and it's not a joke anymore. Ultimate guide on god-mode setup of Grok Bot, the org chart that runs while you sleep, step by step: A Chief of Staff sits in the middle with no tools of its own, BUT it reads the outcome you gave it, picks who does what, and never does the work itself. That one rule is why it never turns into the bottleneck you hired it to remove. → Researcher pulls real sources and tracks what's actually moving, not what sounds true → Writer turns that into finished copy while the research is still in the room → Visualiser gets three reference visuals once, then ships everything in that style forever → Analyst reads what performed and tells the rest of the team what to stop doing → Scheduler owns timing and holds the queue → Publisher actually ships What makes it different from every AI tool you've used: each bot gets its own computer in the cloud, its own browser, its own files, and they all share one memory. So the research is already sitting inside the draft before the draft starts. Nothing gets copy-pasted between tabs, nothing waits on you to approve step four of nine. And you never write a workflow for it. You hit record, do the job once the way you actually do it, stop. It pulls out the steps, saves them as a skill, and puts it on a schedule. The shape you're aiming for on every bot: everything reversible finished, nothing sent. 36 drafts queued, 0 published. It does all the work and stops dead at the one line only you can cross. You stop prompting. You start assigning. Full charter blocks, the approval line and the routines are in the article below ↓

Elon Musk, absolute leader of the AI race with Grok Bot, and it's not a joke anymore. Ultimate guide on god-mode setup of Grok Bot, the org chart that runs while you sleep, step by step: A Chief of Staff sits in the middle with no tools of its own, BUT it reads the outcome you gave it, picks who does what, and never does the work itself. That one rule is why it never turns into the bottleneck you hired it to remove. → Researcher pulls real sources and tracks what's actually moving, not what sounds true → Writer turns that into finished copy while the research is still in the room → Visualiser gets three reference visuals once, then ships everything in that style forever → Analyst reads what performed and tells the rest of the team what to stop doing → Scheduler owns timing and holds the queue → Publisher actually ships What makes it different from every AI tool you've used: each bot gets its own computer in the cloud, its own browser, its own files, and they all share one memory. So the research is already sitting inside the draft before the draft starts. Nothing gets copy-pasted between tabs, nothing waits on you to approve step four of nine. And you never write a workflow for it. You hit record, do the job once the way you actually do it, stop. It pulls out the steps, saves them as a skill, and puts it on a schedule. The shape you're aiming for on every bot: everything reversible finished, nothing sent. 36 drafts queued, 0 published. It does all the work and stops dead at the one line only you can cross. You stop prompting. You start assigning. Full charter blocks, the approval line and the routines are in the article below ↓

Miraqle

87,098 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

elon musk started with 7 grok agents. by morning each had spawned somewhere between 80 and 900 more on its own, and no one had told them to multiply. openai and anthropic each sell you one agent that sits still for $400. this whole self-building swarm runs for $5 the swarm above is that overnight run, seven seeds that turned into thousands, every one of them working a slice of the same job with nobody at the keyboard here is the exact setup, and it costs nothing on top of a $5 key: -> spin up one grok agent and give it a standing order instead of a prompt: own a boring niche people search every day -> it reads x and reddit complaints in real time and picks the one nobody wants but everybody googles, because it is grok and it sees the whole app -> when the work outgrows it, it spawns its own helpers, 80 to 900 of them, and splits the site between them -> they build it on their own machines and ship 3 to 6 useful pages a night, on a routine you set once -> the swarm writes, negotiates and closes its own affiliate and referral deals by email, in your name, at 3am -> telegram sends you the money report and you never open the site -> month one is traffic, month three the first $237 lands, and it does not stop after that the whole time, opus 5 and gpt-5.6 are still sitting frozen, waiting for you to type the next message. one is a swarm that builds its own workforce and its own income while you sleep, the other is a $200 chat you have to drive by hand drop your $400/mo stack to $5, and bookmark this before someone's swarm spawns another 600 pages into the niche you would have owned. the full playbook is in the article below

elon musk started with 7 grok agents. by morning each had spawned somewhere between 80 and 900 more on its own, and no one had told them to multiply. openai and anthropic each sell you one agent that sits still for $400. this whole self-building swarm runs for $5 the swarm above is that overnight run, seven seeds that turned into thousands, every one of them working a slice of the same job with nobody at the keyboard here is the exact setup, and it costs nothing on top of a $5 key: -> spin up one grok agent and give it a standing order instead of a prompt: own a boring niche people search every day -> it reads x and reddit complaints in real time and picks the one nobody wants but everybody googles, because it is grok and it sees the whole app -> when the work outgrows it, it spawns its own helpers, 80 to 900 of them, and splits the site between them -> they build it on their own machines and ship 3 to 6 useful pages a night, on a routine you set once -> the swarm writes, negotiates and closes its own affiliate and referral deals by email, in your name, at 3am -> telegram sends you the money report and you never open the site -> month one is traffic, month three the first $237 lands, and it does not stop after that the whole time, opus 5 and gpt-5.6 are still sitting frozen, waiting for you to type the next message. one is a swarm that builds its own workforce and its own income while you sleep, the other is a $200 chat you have to drive by hand drop your $400/mo stack to $5, and bookmark this before someone's swarm spawns another 600 pages into the niche you would have owned. the full playbook is in the article below

starmex

97,805 görüntüleme • 20 gün önce

GROK BOT SHIPPED THREE WEEKS AGO AND THERE IS ALREADY A FULL CURRICULUM FOR IT 17 STEPS, AND BY THE LAST ONE THE BOT WORKS NIGHTS AND REPORTS TO YOU IN THE MORNING Rendered the article as an academy run -- one rookie, five stations, watch it level up. > FOUNDATIONS: stop chatting, write the mission, one workspace. > PERSISTENT AGENTS: names, memory, routines that fire without you. > TOOLS + SHARED CONTEXT: browser, files, code -- and one computer for the whole team, so handoffs are just colleagues sharing a disk. > TEAM WORKFLOWS: roles, an approval queue, the night shift. The rank ladder is the real hook: CHATBOT USER -> OPERATOR -> ORCHESTRATOR -> MANAGER -> EMPLOYER Most people quit at step 4. The employees begin there. Bookmark it before your competitor's bot finishes the course first ↓

GROK BOT SHIPPED THREE WEEKS AGO AND THERE IS ALREADY A FULL CURRICULUM FOR IT 17 STEPS, AND BY THE LAST ONE THE BOT WORKS NIGHTS AND REPORTS TO YOU IN THE MORNING Rendered the article as an academy run -- one rookie, five stations, watch it level up. > FOUNDATIONS: stop chatting, write the mission, one workspace. > PERSISTENT AGENTS: names, memory, routines that fire without you. > TOOLS + SHARED CONTEXT: browser, files, code -- and one computer for the whole team, so handoffs are just colleagues sharing a disk. > TEAM WORKFLOWS: roles, an approval queue, the night shift. The rank ladder is the real hook: CHATBOT USER -> OPERATOR -> ORCHESTRATOR -> MANAGER -> EMPLOYER Most people quit at step 4. The employees begin there. Bookmark it before your competitor's bot finishes the course first ↓

slash1s

14,855 görüntüleme • 16 gün önce

I gave Elon's Grok Bot $1,000 and one rule. Grow it or I delete you. 15 hours later it is holding $3,900. Every trade of it landed on a public address. No private account and no screenshots, nothing here sits behind my word. Every cycle it: → reads the news and the filings before the rest of the market gets to them → checks who is putting money behind the story, not who is talking about it → scores the idea and sizes it against a hard risk cap → writes the exit before it takes the entry → logs the fill, the slippage and the fee separately → reads its own losing trades at night and rewrites the rules by morning It does not care what you trade. Gold, oil, a stock you inherited or a coin that launched an hour ago, the rules are the same. Setup took one evening. Create the chief of staff, hand the rest job titles the way you brief new hires, run one task on your screen while they watch, connect Telegram. Nothing to install past the app and nobody to wait on. Morgan Stanley pays a person six figures to do one slice of that job. Mine costs $300 a month, and it does not sleep, does not get bored, and has no opinion about last week. 15 hours in and it sits at $3,900. What do you think it has in a week? The whole build is going up soon. Every job title, every prompt, so anyone can stand one up.

I gave Elon's Grok Bot $1,000 and one rule. Grow it or I delete you. 15 hours later it is holding $3,900. Every trade of it landed on a public address. No private account and no screenshots, nothing here sits behind my word. Every cycle it: → reads the news and the filings before the rest of the market gets to them → checks who is putting money behind the story, not who is talking about it → scores the idea and sizes it against a hard risk cap → writes the exit before it takes the entry → logs the fill, the slippage and the fee separately → reads its own losing trades at night and rewrites the rules by morning It does not care what you trade. Gold, oil, a stock you inherited or a coin that launched an hour ago, the rules are the same. Setup took one evening. Create the chief of staff, hand the rest job titles the way you brief new hires, run one task on your screen while they watch, connect Telegram. Nothing to install past the app and nobody to wait on. Morgan Stanley pays a person six figures to do one slice of that job. Mine costs $300 a month, and it does not sleep, does not get bored, and has no opinion about last week. 15 hours in and it sits at $3,900. What do you think it has in a week? The whole build is going up soon. Every job title, every prompt, so anyone can stand one up.

cvxv666

342,243 görüntüleme • 22 gün önce

OH F*CK, I RAN AN ENTIRE OPERATION OFF ONE $40 SEAT! grok bot, xai's agents each with own always-on computer in the cloud, a browser and a terminal, signed into my real tools i gave six of them job titles instead of prompts research > drafting > outreach > ops > finance > support, one narrow charter each nothing overlapping i showed one of them a task once while it watched it's own screen it saved the whole flow as a named skill and now fires it the moment a matching email lands / no plugin for a tool? the bot drives it's own browser until it hits a login wall, hands me the screen, then resumes in that session, so it holds a session and never a password / xai, aug 21: grok bot now ships with all supergrok plus, cursor pro + and cursor teams plans / cursor's own pricing page lists team at $40 / user / mo, with "access to grok bot" on both team tiers / cursor pro at $20 still doen't get it pro+ is where the individual floor moved to

OH F*CK, I RAN AN ENTIRE OPERATION OFF ONE $40 SEAT! grok bot, xai's agents each with own always-on computer in the cloud, a browser and a terminal, signed into my real tools i gave six of them job titles instead of prompts research > drafting > outreach > ops > finance > support, one narrow charter each nothing overlapping i showed one of them a task once while it watched it's own screen it saved the whole flow as a named skill and now fires it the moment a matching email lands / no plugin for a tool? the bot drives it's own browser until it hits a login wall, hands me the screen, then resumes in that session, so it holds a session and never a password / xai, aug 21: grok bot now ships with all supergrok plus, cursor pro + and cursor teams plans / cursor's own pricing page lists team at $40 / user / mo, with "access to grok bot" on both team tiers / cursor pro at $20 still doen't get it pro+ is where the individual floor moved to

dunik

11,496 görüntüleme • 25 gün önce

Someone just posted the full blueprint for an AI swarm that does the job of a 200-person quant research team. Six agents. Running 24/7. Finding brand-new alpha while you sleep. Citadel needs 100 PhDs to do this. Two Sigma needs 200. This does it with six bots and one laptop. Two ways to play this - spend a weekend building your own swarm, or copy the wallet of one that's already up $2M: Boris Cherny runs Claude Code at Anthropic. Two weeks ago he said: "I don't prompt Claude anymore. I have loops running that prompt Claude. My job is to write loops" Alpha research is just a pipeline. So instead of sitting in it, you hand each stage to its own agent: > one reads every new research paper overnight and pulls out the trade idea > one builds the features and cleans the data > one backtests it over 20 years, costs and slippage included > one runs the hard stats and kills anything overfit > one checks it still works in every market regime > one strips out plain momentum and value to see if any real edge is left Each of those six is a job a fund pays a $600,000-a-year quant to do. He runs all six for the price of an API bill. The rule that makes it work: the agent that builds a signal never gets to approve it. A separate, stronger agent tries to kill it first. Whatever survives all six by morning is real, new alpha. One trader's already running this exact swarm on Polymarket. That $2M wallet is public, every trade on-chain. The full build is in the post below - six agents, the tool that runs them, and the five mistakes that kill most people. Bookmark & read this before it's buried.

cvxv666

103,734 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Your ai agent is genuinely smart right up until it has to do something in the real world ask it to host a site, send an email, scrape a page, take a payment, and the magic stops. now you're the one doing the boring part: → hunting api keys → paying for subscriptions you'll use once → gluing integrations together → losing an afternoon to config files i gave my agent access to Zero instead and just described the job. it built and hosted a full ai tool marketplace, 120+ tools, live on a real url, and i configured nothing. no keys, no dashboards, no setup zero plugs agents into 14,000+ real services on demand. everything runs on pay-per-use microtransactions, so you pay for the one call you make, not a monthly plan you forget about what's the one task your agent still can't do on its own? that's exactly the gap this closes $5 free credit → #Ad

Your ai agent is genuinely smart right up until it has to do something in the real world ask it to host a site, send an email, scrape a page, take a payment, and the magic stops. now you're the one doing the boring part: → hunting api keys → paying for subscriptions you'll use once → gluing integrations together → losing an afternoon to config files i gave my agent access to Zero instead and just described the job. it built and hosted a full ai tool marketplace, 120+ tools, live on a real url, and i configured nothing. no keys, no dashboards, no setup zero plugs agents into 14,000+ real services on demand. everything runs on pay-per-use microtransactions, so you pay for the one call you make, not a monthly plan you forget about what's the one task your agent still can't do on its own? that's exactly the gap this closes $5 free credit → #Ad

Freya Lawson

80,316 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

ELON MUSK REPOSTED MY GROK BOT CONTENT SETUP. AND I STILL DON'T UNDERSTAND WHY NOBODY IS DOING THIS WITH TRADING YET. A WALL STREET RESEARCH DESK COSTS MILLIONS A YEAR TO STAFF – YOU CAN NOW RUN THE SAME THING WITH 9 GROK BOT AGENTS. Nine people used to do this job. Nine Grok Bot agents now do it while you sleep. Here's the entire desk: → MACRO – watches rates, CPI, FOMC. Tells you what kind of day it is before you open a single chart. → SCANNER – sweeps 9,000 tickers for one thing: your setup. Not "interesting stocks". Yours. → CATALYST – reads every 8-K, earnings call and wire the second it drops. Flags the two that matter. → QUANT – backtests the idea before you fall in love with it. Kills it if the edge isn't there. → CRYPTO – on-chain flows, funding, basis. The stuff nobody has the energy to check at 2am. → RISK – the one that actually saves you. Sizes the position, sets the stop, refuses the 4th trade. → EXECUTION – places the order, tracks the fill, reports the slippage in basis points. → COMPLIANCE – logs every single decision. So you can audit yourself instead of lying to yourself. → CHIEF OF STAFF – sits on top of all eight. Ranks their output and hands you one page every morning. Here's the part nobody says out loud: Retail traders don't lose because they lack information. They lose because they can't process it fast enough – and can't stay disciplined when they do. Grok Bot solves the first problem completely. RISK and COMPLIANCE quietly solve the second one, because a bot never moves a stop loss. And you write zero code. You describe each agent in plain English, tell it where to look, give it one job. Start with two: SCANNER and RISK. That alone is more process than 95% of retail traders have ever run. Not financial advice – this is a research desk, not a money printer. The bots find and organise. You decide. Bookmark this & read more in the article below ↓

ELON MUSK REPOSTED MY GROK BOT CONTENT SETUP. AND I STILL DON'T UNDERSTAND WHY NOBODY IS DOING THIS WITH TRADING YET. A WALL STREET RESEARCH DESK COSTS MILLIONS A YEAR TO STAFF – YOU CAN NOW RUN THE SAME THING WITH 9 GROK BOT AGENTS. Nine people used to do this job. Nine Grok Bot agents now do it while you sleep. Here's the entire desk: → MACRO – watches rates, CPI, FOMC. Tells you what kind of day it is before you open a single chart. → SCANNER – sweeps 9,000 tickers for one thing: your setup. Not "interesting stocks". Yours. → CATALYST – reads every 8-K, earnings call and wire the second it drops. Flags the two that matter. → QUANT – backtests the idea before you fall in love with it. Kills it if the edge isn't there. → CRYPTO – on-chain flows, funding, basis. The stuff nobody has the energy to check at 2am. → RISK – the one that actually saves you. Sizes the position, sets the stop, refuses the 4th trade. → EXECUTION – places the order, tracks the fill, reports the slippage in basis points. → COMPLIANCE – logs every single decision. So you can audit yourself instead of lying to yourself. → CHIEF OF STAFF – sits on top of all eight. Ranks their output and hands you one page every morning. Here's the part nobody says out loud: Retail traders don't lose because they lack information. They lose because they can't process it fast enough – and can't stay disciplined when they do. Grok Bot solves the first problem completely. RISK and COMPLIANCE quietly solve the second one, because a bot never moves a stop loss. And you write zero code. You describe each agent in plain English, tell it where to look, give it one job. Start with two: SCANNER and RISK. That alone is more process than 95% of retail traders have ever run. Not financial advice – this is a research desk, not a money printer. The bots find and organise. You decide. Bookmark this & read more in the article below ↓

SCOTTY BEAM

93,953 görüntüleme • 26 gün önce

Grok Bot by Elon Musk just replaced a $294,000 Wall Street research desk. Six AI agents, $200 a month, doing the work BlackRock pays people six figures for. The guy who built it published every prompt. What that desk cost before the bots: > $27,000 a year for the Bloomberg terminal > $22,000 for Refinitiv > $50,000 for sell-side research > $15,000 for AlphaSense > $180,000 for the junior analyst who reads all of it until 2am so somebody senior can trade on it before the open $294,000 a year. The agents cost $2,400. Same brief, 122 times cheaper, and it is there before the open. Six agents split that desk. Each one gets its own computer in the cloud, and they all write into the same vault. > FILINGS reads every 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K on a 100-ticker watchlist overnight and flags the ugly parts: going concern language, auditor changes, restatements > EARNINGS reads the call transcript within 24 hours and tells you if the CFO got quieter than he was last quarter > SECTOR does one pass per sector and picks up the rule change nobody read > INSIDER catches Form 4 buys over $1 million and new positions from Two Sigma, Third Point and D.E. Shaw the day the 13Fs land > CHATTER counts mentions on X and flags any ticker three standard deviations louder than its own 30-day normal > CHIEF OF STAFF reads the other five at 5:30am, bins anything only one of them flagged, and emails you the ranked brief at 6 One analyst covers 30 names. Six agents cover 3,000 and finish before the open. You show them the job once. They repeat it every night with your laptop shut. Every research floor on Wall Street was priced on reading being slow and people being expensive. Both of those stopped being true this month. So you wake up, read for five minutes, and know what moved on every name you hold. That used to be somebody's entire job, and he got a bonus for it. The article below is the step by step guide to building the whole AI trading machine. Save & read it, you will want it open while you build.

Grok Bot by Elon Musk just replaced a $294,000 Wall Street research desk. Six AI agents, $200 a month, doing the work BlackRock pays people six figures for. The guy who built it published every prompt. What that desk cost before the bots: > $27,000 a year for the Bloomberg terminal > $22,000 for Refinitiv > $50,000 for sell-side research > $15,000 for AlphaSense > $180,000 for the junior analyst who reads all of it until 2am so somebody senior can trade on it before the open $294,000 a year. The agents cost $2,400. Same brief, 122 times cheaper, and it is there before the open. Six agents split that desk. Each one gets its own computer in the cloud, and they all write into the same vault. > FILINGS reads every 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K on a 100-ticker watchlist overnight and flags the ugly parts: going concern language, auditor changes, restatements > EARNINGS reads the call transcript within 24 hours and tells you if the CFO got quieter than he was last quarter > SECTOR does one pass per sector and picks up the rule change nobody read > INSIDER catches Form 4 buys over $1 million and new positions from Two Sigma, Third Point and D.E. Shaw the day the 13Fs land > CHATTER counts mentions on X and flags any ticker three standard deviations louder than its own 30-day normal > CHIEF OF STAFF reads the other five at 5:30am, bins anything only one of them flagged, and emails you the ranked brief at 6 One analyst covers 30 names. Six agents cover 3,000 and finish before the open. You show them the job once. They repeat it every night with your laptop shut. Every research floor on Wall Street was priced on reading being slow and people being expensive. Both of those stopped being true this month. So you wake up, read for five minutes, and know what moved on every name you hold. That used to be somebody's entire job, and he got a bonus for it. The article below is the step by step guide to building the whole AI trading machine. Save & read it, you will want it open while you build.

cvxv666

815,025 görüntüleme • 29 gün önce

SpaceXAI engineer, ex-Cursor: "my Grok Bots now do the work of a 12-person engineering team, and I haven't written a line of code by hand in 4 months we ship 30+ features a week, the bots build all of it, my only job left is hitting approve" in an 18-minute breakdown, a SpaceXAI engineer shows the exact setup doing the work of a full team with one person signing off worth more than a $500 course on agentic engineering watch today, then read how to build that same build-it-for-you structure into your own Grok Bots in the article below

SpaceXAI engineer, ex-Cursor: "my Grok Bots now do the work of a 12-person engineering team, and I haven't written a line of code by hand in 4 months we ship 30+ features a week, the bots build all of it, my only job left is hitting approve" in an 18-minute breakdown, a SpaceXAI engineer shows the exact setup doing the work of a full team with one person signing off worth more than a $500 course on agentic engineering watch today, then read how to build that same build-it-for-you structure into your own Grok Bots in the article below

KingWilliam

13,472 görüntüleme • 13 gün önce

SpaceXAI just dropped full guide on how to run multiple agents "I stopped running Grok Bot as separate chats. now every project gets its own AI team, manager and task board" one Projects Manager agent creates the project, opens the channel and assigns the right agents: • coder • researcher • writer every team gets its own context, tasks and workspace → instead of managing prompts, you manage teams → instead of running one agent, you run an organization SpaceXAI shared the full setup, roles and workflow for running multiple GrokBot teams at once worth more than 100 multi-agent posts on X save now, then read how to build a parallel agent system in the article below

SpaceXAI just dropped full guide on how to run multiple agents "I stopped running Grok Bot as separate chats. now every project gets its own AI team, manager and task board" one Projects Manager agent creates the project, opens the channel and assigns the right agents: • coder • researcher • writer every team gets its own context, tasks and workspace → instead of managing prompts, you manage teams → instead of running one agent, you run an organization SpaceXAI shared the full setup, roles and workflow for running multiple GrokBot teams at once worth more than 100 multi-agent posts on X save now, then read how to build a parallel agent system in the article below

0xRafy

12,230 görüntüleme • 7 gün önce